T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1141.1 | Common happenings | TYFYS::MOLLER | Halloween the 13th on Elm Street #7 | Mon Feb 13 1989 14:42 | 17 |
| Impeadance is a measurement of reactance, and it relates to AC signals,
and the frequencies that they are measured at. An 8 ohm speaker is 8
ohms at a given frequency (usually 1000Hz). If measured as a DC
resistance, the impeadance measurement won't necessarily be the same
as the resistance shown on your meter. Actually, I'm surprized that
your numbers are as close as they are for the 4 ohm cabinet, I would
have expected 2 to 3 ohms.
As for the Marshal head; you might have damaged it, as most tube
amplifiers require a load on the output transformer at all times when
powered up. If the output transformer goes, you'll never forget the
smell (it stinks) that it has. For now, I'd continue to use it, as it
doesn't appear to be damaged (listen for bubbling sounds eminating
from the transformer - If you hear them, something is wrong, or about
to go wrong).
Jens
|
1141.2 | | CCYLON::ANDERSON | | Mon Feb 13 1989 14:43 | 11 |
| Amplifiers (especially tube ones) rarely if ever need a load on
them inorder to avoid damaging them. On the contrary it is too
much load ie too low an impedence (close to or a dead short) at
the output that will damage an amp. Even with tube amps the output
is coupled to the speakers through a transformer thus isolating
the output.
You can't measure speaker impedence with just an ohmmeter.
Jim
|
1141.3 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Deeper in Debt | Tue Feb 14 1989 07:44 | 8 |
| If I read .2 correctly then you're dead wrong. Open the output of
a tube amp (ie: disconnect the speaker) and your output transformer
is swiss cheeze. Something about reflected power etc...similarly
putting too small of a load on it (ie: less than rated ohm-age)
will produce similar results but perhaps not as fast (depends on
how small the load is)
dbii
|
1141.4 | The reason and what can be done | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | just a revolutionary with a pseudonym | Tue Feb 14 1989 08:39 | 0 |
1141.5 | The reason and what can be done | 25749::JASNIEWSKI | just a revolutionary with a pseudonym | Tue Feb 14 1989 08:42 | 23 |
|
What happens to the output transformer is that the energy has
no place to go when a speaker is not connected. The energy then
tries to leak out wherever it can, usually as a very high voltage
on the primary windings. When this voltage gets high enough in
potential, it can jump thru the varnish insulation on the primary
winding, causing a carbon trail. Once the carbon trail is formed,
the voltage doesnt need to get very high, so, even with the speaker
connected, it will still prefer conducting across the carbon trail;
you're output transformer is ruined.
According to the Marshall schematics I have, the output goes
*open circuit* when the speaker is disconnected; there is no "shorting
pin" on the output 1/4" jack connectors! This leaves the possibility
of ruining the output transformer wide open, should the amp be operated
at a high level with the speaker cab accidently disconnected. Thanks,
Jim!
This situation can be corrected by replacing the std "spkr 1"
jack with one that switches the output to ground, when the plug is
removed. Even a Traynor amp gives you that!
Joe Jas
|
1141.6 | How do you measure impedance? | SQUID::GOODWIN | I've got a mind to give up livin' | Tue Feb 14 1989 09:47 | 20 |
| re .2 >You can't measure speaker impedance with just an ohmmeter.<
Sounds believable - how can I determine the impedance of unmarked
speakers that I have? Is there a measurement technique that doesn't
require an BSEE? Can the DC resistance of a speaker be used to
make an educated guess at the impedance (i.e. would an 8 ohm speaker
always show a DC resistance in a certain range)?
After reading these responses, I double checked the DC resistance
measurements I took on 'known' speaker cabs, and my first reading
was not precise. As it turns out, the 8 ohm cab read about 6.5,
its individual speakers (2x16ohm 12's wired parallel) measured
about 13.2, the 4 ohm cab read about 3.4 and its speakers (2x12
8 ohms) also read 6.5.
I was trying to use these 'known' readings to guess the impedance
of other drivers I have which aren't labeled - I would like to
build up another cab. Any ideas?
Thanks, Steve
|
1141.7 | You can take an educated guess | TYFYS::MOLLER | Halloween the 13th on Elm Street #7 | Tue Feb 14 1989 15:32 | 24 |
| You are fairly safe in your assumption that you can guess the
impeadance using an ohm-meter. Most speakers are either 8 or 16 ohms
(a few are 4 ohms, but not many). Some devices are only thier rated
impeadance at certain frequencies (Piezo's have been discussed in this
conferance - I guess that above 5 - 10 Khz they are low enough to work
as as speaker load, below those frequencies, the impeadance is 1000
ohms or more - note: I have no documentation in front of me to verify
this, nor do I have any referances available that discusses piezos in
depth), and others are only active based on a cross over network.
One thing that I'll mention is that you should attempt to make sure
that your speakers are in phase with each other. A quick way to verify
this is with a 1 1/2 volt battery. When you touch the speaker terminals
to the battery, it will jump in or out. If you have speakers wired
together, they should all jump in the same direction when you attach
the battery. (9 volt batts work too)
As for smoked transformers, I had a Fender BASSMAN transformer that
went up in smoke relating to an unconnected load on it. Since Fender
was the only source for replacement parts at the time, it cost about
$95.00 to get replaced (back in the early 1970's). I use a Twin Reverb
these days & I never run it unloaded.
Jens
|
1141.8 | | CCYLON::ANDERSON | | Thu Feb 23 1989 16:43 | 13 |
| re .5 Transformer backlash is only a problem with a poorly designed
transformer coupled TRANSISTOR amplifier. And that is only if they
were too cheap to diode protect the output. Tube amplifiers and
non transformer coupled transistor amplifiers are not harmes by
a no load condition at the output. The most danger to these amplifiers
comes when you SHORT the outputs not the converse. Maybe you are
thinking of input shorting pins, that would be correct. The backlash
creates by the low impedence secondary of the outout transformer
against 300+ volts in a tube amp is minimal. This is *assuming*
the amplifier was designed properly.
Jim
|
1141.9 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Deeper in Debt | Mon Feb 27 1989 08:09 | 11 |
| re .8 Perhaps you're right today, however, my old Marshall went south after
I raised the load from 8 ohms to 50+ (back when I designed the first
power soak say '71 or so). The output transformer fried
bigtime...standing waves ate the primary.
At that time Marshall or any other amp I'm aware of (primarily Fenders)
were not protected in any way...screw up the load and they fried. Just
running a 4 ohm load when set for 8 ohms was enough to cause them
grief.
dbii
|
1141.10 | whats burning ? | DORIS::EVANS | dotted frets play louder...Fact | Mon Feb 27 1989 09:07 | 25 |
|
Hold on a second. .5 is right, in a transformer coupled output
stage of a valve (sorry tube) amp if the output is not loaded there
is nothing to absorb the back E.M.F. The final drive in my valve
(tube) amp runs 400v anode to cathode then from first principals
its dI/dT x #turns on primary = Back E.M.F = Kvolts. What happens
then is arcing occurs across the transformer. This can be
supressed by use of a snubbing zener diode but as most users of
yester-year tech were aware of the fact it was a problem to run
open circuit it was not normal to fit these.
I had this problem on an old HI-WATT amp which had a dry joint
on the speaker connection, the blue sparks were very pretty for
the little time it lasted.
Of course running short circuit dumps all the output current
into the secondary windings & they melt basically. So all you guys
working on super-conducting speakers for your boogies & marshalls,
it's not a good idea :-)
Cheers
Pete.
|