T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1051.1 | I've Heard Some, They Seemed OK | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Tue Jan 03 1989 14:19 | 13 |
|
Randall has never had good distribution here on the east
coast....notice all their endorsees are west coast players.
The stuff I've heard (mostly bass amps) was good and solid but not
awesome...kind of meat and potatoes instead of steak and lobster,
eh?
That little combo, I think it's called an RG-80, 80 watts, channel
switching, 12" Celestion, does sound nice when cranked....about
as tube-like as you can get with transistors.
|
1051.2 | Ronnie Montrose? | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | just say KNOW | Wed Jan 04 1989 14:02 | 11 |
|
I had been under the impression that Randall amp's claim was
to be able to render the "tube sound" using a solid state circuit.
They do this by building their output stages using the devices as
"current sources" vs the voltage source topology of the typical
power amp. This gives a softer drive to the speaker emulating the
lower damping factor inherant in tube amps. I also thought Ronnie
Montrose endorsed them?
Joe Jas
|
1051.3 | I Wouldn't Listen Too Much To Ronnie | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Wed Jan 04 1989 16:05 | 12 |
|
Unfortunately, Ronnie has also endorsed Lab Series and GK, and
currently is a Pearce endorsee... although he said in GP recently he
heard a Marshall Artist 30, was blown away, and bitched to Dan Pearce
that his tone wasn't good enough, so Pearce went and built him an amp
that sounded just like the Marshall.
One guy I know who plays metal and works in a store that sells Randall
likes the RG-80 (but he uses Marshall himself). He told me he thought
that it sounded much more tube-like when cranked up than it did
when it was played quietly. I dunno....I heard him playing through
it and it sounded good to me.
|
1051.4 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | slimy cold weather! | Thu Jan 05 1989 08:06 | 5 |
| not to endorse or pan Randall amps but almost every solid state
amp I've ever heard sounded more like a tube amp the louder you cranked
it, this may be a function of volume and my ears...
dbii
|
1051.5 | MAYBE NEW MAYBE NOT | SALEM::PARKER | | Thu Jan 05 1989 09:09 | 15 |
|
I believe the amps randall now puts are a fairly new line. The heads
that are coming are tube heads with channel switching. I am not
certain just how new they are but i haven't seen them anywhere else
as of yet. The pamphlet shows vivian campbell and def leppard as
a couple of the endorsees.
DAVE
|
1051.6 | I've toyed around w/Randall since 1979 | SALEM::ABATELLI | On the dark side of the moon | Fri Jan 06 1989 13:46 | 15 |
| I have a friend in NY that has sold Randall amps since 1979. When
they first came out, they were the pits! No tone, noisy, buzz tone
for distortion, then they got smart, they redesigned the whole lot
and gave them a Celestion option. The 80watt that was mentioned
with the Celestion kicks a*s altho it's clean channel sounds too
metalic for my tastes. I guess it all depends on what you want
it for. Personally, if I was looking for an amp... Randall wouldn't
be one I'd look at first. When I was living in NY, I played with
every amp (once every week) that my friend had in the store. Randall
was never the first one I tried.
This is JMO, so please take this for what its worth. Opinions?
Everybody has one. I will say, that they're better than the ones
in 1979, but not good enough.
Fred
|
1051.7 | Re .2 and .3 | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | just a revolutionary with a pseudonym | Fri Jan 06 1989 15:43 | 6 |
|
ooops! I was wrong, GK - not Randall - has the hi Z transistor
power amp topology.
Joe Jas
|
1051.8 | Rock'n'Roll Randall | SCUBBA::SYSTEM | One more for the Gipper | Fri Jan 13 1989 15:15 | 14 |
| I have played an RG-80 w/ the 12" celestion for approx. 5 years
and so far no complaints. It's plenty loud and has more than enough
power to drive a 4-12 cab. It is sort of noisy, even on the clean
channel - but it does (IMHO) sound great. The only problem I'v
encountered with it was when the handle decided to leave on it's
own (fortunately not while I was climbing stairs with it). It doesn't
compare to a Marshall or a Boogie, but neither does the price.
And it certainly beats anything that Peavey has ever (and I dare
say WILL ever) built.
bottom line --> I would recomend their amps but not their handles.
Brad Karrfalt
|
1051.9 | top amp | CSC32::M_VEGA | | Thu Jun 15 1989 13:49 | 0 |
1051.10 | I wouldn't buy one | FRETZ::HEISER | stop making sense! | Thu Feb 20 1992 12:15 | 9 |
| When my Kitty Hawk was in the shop last fall, my band also happened to
be doing some once-in-a-lifetime recording. I had to rent something
and ended up renting a Randall � stack.
I wasn't real impressed with the amp and hated the results. Part of it
was a poor instrument mix, imho, but it couldn't touch my Kitty Hawk
M1. I wish I had the chance to fix it up with KH.
Mike
|
1051.11 | | CAVLRY::BUCK | Nothing really matters... | Thu Feb 20 1992 13:01 | 1 |
| Randall's, no matter what version, have always seemed kind of naff.
|
1051.12 | JMHO | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Now I'm down in it | Thu Feb 20 1992 14:12 | 7 |
| I've never heard a Randall amp that I liked. They all seem to have
this really annoying high pitched buzzing that just grates on my
nerves. It's like it sounds killer for the first few minutes, then it
starts bothering you, which gets progressively worse to the point that
after about an hour in the room with one you want to kill something!
Greg
|
1051.13 | I tried one last night.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Toy Syndrome Addict | Wed Aug 19 1992 10:01 | 21 |
| At our last rehearsal before the "gig", I borrowed a Randall unit last
night. It was offered for free to use the rest of the week, so I said
OK! It was a model something like "80/112", I think. The back was
labeled "80 watts RMS at 4 ohm, 100 watts RMS at 8 ohms"...I may have
those reversed. It is a combo amp with one 12" Celestion. It has two
channels with Master and Gain controls, a channel switching footswitch,
reverb, treble, bass, middle, and presence controls that affect/effect
both channels. I set up one channel for clean, and one for a little
edge. The lead channel (edge) put out a pretty nice "Tube Screamer"
sounding clip. The clean channel pretty much gave me a nice strat and
Les Paul tone, using those guitars respectively. The amp was
incredibly loud, probably pushing significantly more air than a KH
60 watter. It was really too loud at about half volume....I was
favorably impressed with the unit, liked the tone, and still have some
time to learn how to get those knobs tweaked.
If the price was right, I would consider buying one...
FWIW,
Dawg
|
1051.14 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | A proud AMPutee ... | Wed Aug 19 1992 11:11 | 1 |
| What kinda money we talkin' here ?
|
1051.15 | I'm curious, too..... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Toy Syndrome Addict | Thu Aug 20 1992 07:58 | 8 |
| RE: -1
I'll see the owner next weekend (8/29). He has a 25 year old
relationship with a music store in the DC area. The store owner pretty
much loans him 'whatever' he needs 'whenever' he needs it, and I
understand he has quite a 'preferred customer' discount. I'll check!
|
1051.16 | | CAVLRY::BUCK | Put up or shut up! | Thu Aug 20 1992 08:08 | 4 |
| Mike Heiser once said he used a Randall � stack on a recording he did,
and said he didn't like it at all...
???
|
1051.17 | yea but | RICKS::CALCAGNI | ufo tofu | Thu Aug 20 1992 08:59 | 4 |
| as I recall, Mike used a Randall on one of his recent Guitarnotes tape
tunes and it smoked! (in the good sense)
Anything to say Mike?
|
1051.18 | He and I talked about this a bit awhile back... | GOES11::G_HOUSE | All over but the shouting | Thu Aug 20 1992 11:28 | 12 |
| Mike's on vacation until next week, but I know he definately used a
Randall half stack on his recording with the band "Vessell". He said
he rented it because his Kitty Hawk was in the shop and that was the
only amp available for him to rent.
Yeah, and he definately said he hated it...
My take on what I heard from that recording is that it got a pretty
decent metal lead sound and about nothing else. The crunch rhythm
sound was poor and the clean sound wasn't all that great either.
Greg
|
1051.19 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | All over but the shouting | Thu Aug 20 1992 11:33 | 24 |
| Oh yeah...
I should probably mention my experience with Randalls. It's been
several years (probably at least 6 or 7) since I played one, but I just
couldn't get a sound I liked from the couple that I played through back
then. The distortion has a high frequency buzzyness that really
bothered me.
It's like it sounds cool at first, then after a few minutes something
starts annoying you about it that you just can't quite put your finger
on, then the longer you play with it, the more it starts REALLY bugging
you. At least that's what happened with me.
I've seen a couple of bands where the guitar player was using Randalls
and experienced the same sensation ("Hey, cool tone from that
Randall"..."Man, something's weird with his sound though"..."Geez, it's
buzzy as all get out"..."I think I need to leave").
In all fairness though, I haven't heard one (except on Mike's
recording) in at least three years, so perhaps they've gotten better.
I'm happy with what I have now though, so I don't really plan on
auditioning any very soon.
Greg
|
1051.20 | no buzzing here.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Toy Syndrome Addict | Thu Aug 20 1992 11:48 | 9 |
| I used this particular combo for about 3 hours on Tuesday night, and
didn't have any probs. Decent tone, LOTS of volume, and no "buzzing".
The only criticism I can think of is it's "knob sensitivity" ala Mesa
Boogie. It took some tweaking to get a volume level I liked. I would
move the Master just a gnat's hair and it would be too loud.....nit.
"OK" amp.....IMHO
Steve
|
1051.21 | The Peavey of the '90s? :-) | ZYMRGY::sam | Up on Cripple Creek | Thu Aug 20 1992 12:15 | 5 |
| Good or bad, they're ALL over the place these days. I went up to Denver
last week and think I saw Randall in every store I went into. Wait a few
years and pick up a used one for next to nothing... :-)
-- Sam
|
1051.22 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | All over but the shouting | Thu Aug 20 1992 14:56 | 5 |
| I should have mentioned that the "buzz" problem was with the distortion
of the unit. I thought the clean sound was kind of lackluster, but it
doesn't make any noise.
Greg
|
1051.23 | Just a bit of 'clip'.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Toy Syndrome Addict | Thu Aug 20 1992 15:28 | 6 |
| re: -1
Oh. This one 'may' buzz, then. I only used a little gain on the lead
channel...just enuff for a "tube screamer"_like distortion.
|
1051.24 | fwiw | FRETZ::HEISER | cross-dressing Democrats | Mon Aug 24 1992 13:52 | 4 |
| I used a Randall on the whole Vessell album. The only Guitarnotes tape
song that is a Vessell tune is "Only One".
Mike
|
1051.25 | but they're loud! | STRAT::JENSEN | Tone == touch | Tue Sep 01 1992 09:40 | 16 |
| >> It's like it sounds cool at first, then after a few minutes something
>> starts annoying you about it that you just can't quite put your finger
>> on, then the longer you play with it, the more it starts REALLY bugging
>> you.
Exactly the same experience I've had. The last time I played in a band
(don't ask), we were in a Denver club. The band before us had these
two guitar players who both used Randall stacks. They were *loud* for
sure, and at first I thought their tone was pretty good. In fact, I
was surprised because the last Randall I'd used had that buzzy mosquito
distortion Greg talks about. So I'm thinking maybe I was wrong about
these amps.... Nope. About 20 minutes into their set the guitars
sound worse than fingernails on a blackboard -- but they're still
*loud* :).
steve
|
1051.26 | werks fer me..... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Toy Syndrome Addict | Tue Sep 01 1992 12:44 | 13 |
| I used the Randall combo again (the one I spoke about a few back). I
played virtually all day on Saturday. I used my Tube Screamer for a
little edge (I'm not a 'big' distortion user), and just set one of the
channels up for a tone I liked. I had ZERO problems, good tone and
plenty of volume all day long. Nice performing amp. We played
outdoors, I had the sucker on about 4, and it virtually kicked ass! I
was killing my tone bro who was using an old Twin. Decent reverb,
too....I'd buy one.
FWIW,
Steve
|
1051.27 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | All over but the shouting | Tue Sep 01 1992 13:38 | 4 |
| Like I say, it's only the distortion channel I didn't like. I don't
actually recall having ever heard one set up for a clean sound.
Greg
|
1051.28 | | MARX::SAKELARIS | | Tue Sep 01 1992 13:57 | 7 |
| re .26 Steve with
>>I
was killing my tone bro who was using an old Twin.
You better shutchore mouth 'r wash it with soap 'n water :^)
"sakman" the Fenderman
|
1051.29 | | CAVLRY::BUCK | C'mon baby lets go for a ride | Tue Sep 01 1992 13:58 | 3 |
| >>I was killing my tone bro who was using an old Twin.
Whad-ya do...push the damn thing over on top of him?
|
1051.30 | gotta have distortion! | FRETZ::HEISER | as warm as tears | Tue Sep 01 1992 14:28 | 1 |
|
|
1051.31 | 8^) | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Toy Syndrome Addict | Wed Sep 02 1992 08:13 | 11 |
| re: 28 & 29
this thing is incredibly loud, guys, I mean REALLY loud! with the
amount of beer that was served, I'm surprised something didn't get
pushed over on someone.......
re: 30
why?
8^)
|
1051.32 | | KDX200::COOPER | A regular model of restraint... | Wed Sep 02 1992 08:42 | 7 |
| In my humble opinion, if you gave Bulldawg distortion, it
would subtract from his playing/sound/style... Let him have
his IBZ Tube Thingie and a regular old amp - he sounds just
great with it...
Although I still use the preset I made him program on my ADA.
:)
|
1051.33 | tee-hee.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Toy Syndrome Addict | Wed Sep 02 1992 08:52 | 8 |
| >> In my humble opinion, if you gave Bulldawg distortion, it
>> would subtract from his playing/sound/style... Let him have
>> his IBZ Tube Thingie and a regular old amp - he sounds just
>> great with it...
Gosh, thanks, Coop....(blush, giggle, blink)
Steve (just a blues/rock man....keep'n it simple)
|
1051.34 | never know when you'll need it | FRETZ::HEISER | as warm as tears | Wed Sep 02 1992 10:56 | 5 |
| > re: 30
>
> why?
Why ask why?
|
1051.35 | Watch that Compression switch | WHOS01::DECOLA | | Sat Nov 07 1992 16:35 | 8 |
|
Just thought I'd revive this note a bit. When you guys check this
amp out (RG 80-112 sc) just note that the Trebel knob is a compressor in
disguise. Pull it out, compresson on, push it in compresson off. If you
don't know this you may get some very strange sounds out of it because
the last guy who used it liked to play everything with compression.
-John-
|