T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1045.1 | Money to burn !! | ANT::JACQUES | | Wed Jan 04 1989 10:06 | 20 |
|
Why is this guitar called the Brock-Da Pra Les Paul ??
Apparently, this particular instrument has added value,
simply because it appeared on the cover of the Book,
or perhaps due to previous owners notoriety, etc.
I can't believe the price of all nice 59 burst will soar
to this level just because of this one exceptional case.
Then again, I'm sure the value is increasing steadily.
Jimmy, at Mr. C's music in Marlboro showed my a hardcover book
that is not available in the US (so he claims) which shows
the private collections of several differant people including
some Japanese collectors. Some of these people only collect
59 Les Paul Sunbursts, others only collect Sunburst Strats.
I'd love to get a copy of this book. Anyone familiar with
it ?
Mark
|
1045.2 | Cheap dollars | RAINBO::WEBER | | Wed Jan 04 1989 11:57 | 11 |
| Mark, that sounds like it could be Mac Yasuda's book, which is
available in the US. Don't believe anything at Mr C's
Brock & Da Pra were two well-known (in collector's cicles)
owners of this guitar. And while I don't think the price of
this one has any effect on sunburst in general, Japanese collectors
have been exerting an overall influence on the price of vintage
guitars that I find distressing. And I doubt that those guitars
will ever find their way back to the US.
Danny W
|
1045.3 | Book em, Danno !! | ANT::JACQUES | | Fri Jan 06 1989 08:34 | 17 |
| So where can I get a copy of Mac Yasuda's book? What is the name
of the book ?
Any other good books on guitar collecting that you would recommend?
I already have "American Guitars", the softcover "Gibson Guitar from
1950", and "Fender Guitars" (another softcover like "Gibson Guitar",
but by a differant author,-bright green cover-). I have the Guitar
Player book, but this has little to do with collecting.
I have a somewhat sketchy collection of Guitar Player magazines,
and would like to find a source for back-issues to fill out my
collection. I have all the issues from the last 5 years, but before
that I am missing copies, and have some beat copies. Any idea, who
carries old back issues. New or used is fine.
thanks,
Mark
|
1045.4 | Read all about it | RAINBO::WEBER | | Fri Jan 06 1989 09:12 | 27 |
| Mark:
Yasuda's book may be out of print, but one place to try is The Bold
Strummer ( I can remember their #, but they often advertise in the
guitar mags.
Tom Wheeler's books are fine. The books by Bishop and Archerd should
be burned. The best book on Gibson is The Gibson Electric, PT 1
by A. Duchossoir, but it only covers electrics to 1961. Pt 2 is
not, and may never be published. His other books on Guitar
Identification and Strats, are very good too. Another book that's
okay is Guitars From The Renaissance to Rock by Evans, but it doesn't
have much of use to collectors.Smith's book on
Rickenbackers is exc. The Tsumura book has beautiful pictures,
but the text is nonsense.
More than one person is working
on a Gretsch book. George Gruhn is also working on a book. This
might be the best of them all (he might have some of my guitars
in it, so it has to be good). Other collectors are also planning
books, including one on Tom Van Hoose' Super 400 collection (I may
be in this one, too).
I have no idea where you can get GP back issues. Watch their
classifieds.
Danny W.
|
1045.5 | Some nice ones are out there | E::EVANS | | Mon Jul 10 1989 10:34 | 12 |
| I was shown a '59 Les Paul sunburst at a guitar shop in Harvard Square that I
understood had been bought from an old music store. Supposedly this guitar had
been sitting in its case for about twenty years and this fellow bought it for
the price on its original tag. When I saw this guitar, it had all of the
original tags still o it and not a single mark. It also was a vary pretty
instrument. I was shown it because I was considering buying a '58 Les Paul
that had been stripped and given a sunburst finish - probably the nicest playing
guitar I have even had it my hands. I passed on this one for $2400 and bought
a new one for less than a quarter the price. At the time I saw this '59 Les
Paul, the owner had said that he had been offered $15K for it. This would have
been around 1982. I wonder if this was the same guitar in the base note?
|
1045.6 | good decision to skip it -- even at 2.4 | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Mon Jul 10 1989 10:40 | 9 |
|
I thought at leas part of the reason some musical instruments gain
in value is the fact that they'd been played and kept in tune for
a long time. But a chunk of wood with out of date electrics in it
for 15k?
Surely not.
Richard.
|
1045.7 | Not the one | MOSAIC::WEBER | | Wed Jul 12 1989 17:47 | 10 |
| re: -.1,-.2
The Brock-Da Pra 'burst was not in New England in 1982.
Collector's guitar values are not influenced by the amount a guitar is
played, except negatively--playing wear lowers value. A refinished
guitar drops in value substantially, so the guitar you mentioned was
probably overpriced.
Danny W.
|
1045.8 | plus a lot of hype? | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Fri Jul 14 1989 05:40 | 9 |
| I heard that 'classical' stringed instruments (cello, for example)
increase in value partly because lots of playing over the years
develops their tone or response or something. So if you make a violin
and lock it in a box for a coupl of hundred years, it doesn't sound as
good as one that's been kept in tune and played reguarly.
Is the same not true for solid guitars?
Richard.
|
1045.9 | Mint is better | RAINBO::WEBER | | Fri Jul 14 1989 09:29 | 10 |
| Doesn't matter whether the tone improves or not, as far as collector's
value. To a collector, an unplayed guitar will be worth more than one
with lots of use, all other things being equal.
There has been interminable debate over whether solidbody tone is
improved by use. For my $.02, I've never noticed any difference between
'50's solids with lots of playing and with almost none. Some sound
better than others, but it doesn't seem related to use.
Danny W.
|
1045.10 | | REGINA::TASSINARI | Bob | Fri Jul 14 1989 09:55 | 5 |
|
As an observation....wouldn't the tone of an acoustic instrument
have more of a chance of changing over time than a solid?
- Bob
|
1045.11 | reckon so | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Fri Jul 14 1989 11:40 | 9 |
| Re .10
Yes -- I'd have thought so. There's no doubt an old tele sounds
different to many new ones, but I put that down to electrics rather
than wood. So if you select a new tele that has good intonation and
no bad resonances anywhere, then stick decent pickups on it, you're
scoring over someone who pays over the odds for an old one.
Richard.
|