T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1033.1 | UK and US Models Different | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Wed Dec 21 1988 10:38 | 18 |
|
Basically there are two types of Vox amps, the real ones form the
UK and the US made ones that were built by Thomas Organ (who had
the US franchise). The US ones were mostly solid-state and include
the dreaded Super Beatle model. The UK ones included the revered
AC-30 which was *the* amp in the UK until Marshall cmae along.
I used to own a US made Essex bass amp, and it was a nice sounding
little box though hardly the sort of thing bassists would drool
over. I paid $90 second-hand, cleaned it up and sold it to a friend
for $110. Then a year later I saw one in Daddy's where they were
asking $300 !!!!!
I recently saw an ad for an AC-30....$750 !!!!
Gulp....
|
1033.2 | AC 30, just say no to Beatle-Vox | ANT::JACQUES | | Wed Dec 21 1988 10:41 | 11 |
| "The" Vox amp to own is the AC30. These are demanding a high
price on the vintage amp market. The "Beatle Vox" does not
have the sound of the AC30.
I would call around to vintage instrument shops in your area
and ask if anyone has an AC30 in stock. Mr. C's music in Marlboro
often gets them in, but gets top dollar for them. The Want Ads
often has a few listed.
Good luck,
Mark
|
1033.3 | | MARKER::BUCKLEY | Yo Dudes, dig the Solstice! | Wed Dec 21 1988 10:52 | 2 |
| I think the Vox amp to own is the AC30T. It has an extra gain stage in
it, as well as strappable input channels to get a vicious distortion!
|
1033.4 | Problems because of 220V 50Hz? | MAY10::DIORIO | | Wed Dec 21 1988 13:03 | 7 |
|
If you were to find and AC30 or AC30T, I assume this would have
been made in the UK. Would you then encounter any problems because
of the differences in voltages (220V 50Hz) that the amp was supposed
to be powered by (not to mention the completely different AC plug)??
Mike D
|
1033.5 | VOX of Marlboro, MA ????? | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Wed Dec 21 1988 13:16 | 9 |
|
Just because AC30s were made in the UK doesn't mean they didn't
make models for sale in the US!!! I don't see too many Mardhalls
around with UK power cords on them 8^) 8^) 8^)
There also was a VOX reissue series made (in the UK) a few years back
(early eighties)and distributed by a company called Primo, located
right here in sunny Marlboro, MA. Unfortunately they went under!!! But
you may come across some relatively new tube Voxes as a result.
|
1033.6 | Voltage selector? | IOSG::CREASY | You're never alone with a T60 | Wed Dec 21 1988 13:16 | 7 |
| My AC30 (all those years ago) used to have a knob with different
voltages marked on it (eg 120, 240). I remember hearing that you
could get a killer distortion by setting it to 220V (which was the
setting below the UK's 240V). I never had the guts to try it out
though...
Nick
|
1033.7 | AC30 | RICKS::CALCAGNI | | Wed Dec 21 1988 13:30 | 11 |
| VOX enthusiasts will tell you an original is the only way to go,
especially with the "top boost" option (AC30T). I know a few places
that import and restore original VOX AC30s and do stuff like add
top boost mods to standard AC30s. There's a real cult following
for these amps. Send mail if you're serious about exploring this
avenue; be prepared to spend $500+.
trivia: one of the guys from the Hooters uses vintage AC30s on stage,
Jeff Beck used an AC30 on "Beck's Bolero".
/rick
|
1033.8 | Don't rule out the US models either. | ROLL::BEFUMO | I chase the winds of a prism ship | Wed Dec 21 1988 14:14 | 13 |
| While the old AC30s are certainly the most desirable amps, don't
overlook the "dreaded" super-beatles, buckinghams, etc. I owned
a SB briefly, long ago, and didnt't like cause it didn't scream
like a marshall. But my recolection is that, as solid-state amps
go, it wasn't all that bad, and seemed to be pretty solidly built
(looked kind of strange, though). The thing is, don't overlook
anything just because lots of people don't like them - it might
be just what you want, at a price that reflects its lack of popularity
more than it's lack of utility or quality. I recall a time when
you could pick up Jazzmasters, Mosrites, and just about any Gretsch
for next to nothing, and look what they're going for now.
jb
|
1033.9 | Snap, Crackle, Pop | TYFYS::MOLLER | Halloween the 13th on Elm Street #7 | Tue Dec 27 1988 23:23 | 32 |
| Hey, I'm sorry, but if A VOX Royal Guardsman was good enough for the
rock band who did 'Snoopy Versus the Red Baron' (by strange coincidence
they were the 'Royal Guardsmen'), it's good enough for me. But, back to
reality (& my Twin reverb). The Transistor VOX amps happen to use
germanium power transistors, and the output transformers happen to be
biased specifically for these impossible to get output transistors,
such that you would need an electrical engineer to reverse engineer the
amp & correct for the output stage, if you ever had a failure. Why do
I bring this up?? Those of us who are EE's remember that Germanium
Power Transistors had this minor problem called thermal runaway. Once
the transistor overheated, it automatically boosted it's gain, and
immediately made itself warmer, which in turn boosted it's gain. As you
can well imagine, this sometimes only took a fraction of a second to
bring total distruction to the output transistors, and a very unique
and pungent yellow cloud from the back of your VOX transistor
amplifier. I repaired a few of these back in the late 1960's & at that
time, Silcon and Germanium power transistors were used about evenly.
Nowadays, nobody uses High Power germanium anything (except maybe
Tunnel Diodes, since - if I remember correctly - these worked on the
principal of negative resistance & never over heated, or something like
that).
If you get an old VOX transistor amplifier NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER
short circuit the output stage, or EVER try a different impeadance
speaker cabinet, as the results are likely to cause irreparable damage
and yellow smoke.
However, I thought that the Super Beatle sounded pretty good, and that
the AC30 was sort of a Twin Reverb Clone (at least that's how I've
heard it described in Guitar Player magazine).
Jens_who's_been_playing_guitar_since_1964
|
1033.10 | Liberty Music has an AC30 | ASHBY::BEFUMO | I chase the winds of a PRISM SHIP! | Sat Dec 31 1988 15:13 | 5 |
| I just came from Liberty Music (1613 Concord St., Framingham -
508-877-5272), and they have an AC30 marked down from $495.00 to
$395.00. I didn't try it, but cosmetically, at least, it appeared
pretty clean.
|
1033.11 | For trivia buffs only | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Two men enter, one man leaves | Tue Jan 03 1989 14:53 | 8 |
| More useless trivia: The Edge of U2 and Brian May of Queen both
use (or used to use) VOX AC30s.
I believe that VOX quit building them for awhile, as I seem to remember
an ad campain a couple of years ago or so talking about the AC30
reissue modes.
Greg
|
1033.12 | Reissued or redesigned? | MAY26::DIORIO | | Wed Jan 04 1989 12:57 | 5 |
|
When the VOX AC30s were "reissued", did they keep them the same
as the old ones (tubes, etc.)??
Mike D
|
1033.13 | Original design, I believe | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Two men enter, one man leaves | Wed Jan 04 1989 13:39 | 4 |
| I don't remember this real clearly, but my impression was that they
were copies of the "vintage" amp.
Greg
|
1033.14 | Tubes, Yes, But WHICH Tubes? | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Wed Jan 04 1989 13:51 | 5 |
|
The early 80s reissue AC30s used tubes, whether or not there were
circuit changes since the 60s, who knows.
|
1033.15 | Any UK noters out there? | MAY26::DIORIO | | Thu Jan 05 1989 13:54 | 34 |
|
Well, we went down and tried the amp last night. My friend bought
it. There wasn't a scratch on it! The tubes in it sounded good to
me. That typical warm tube distortion sound. The amp has 2 12"
Celestions in it, and sounds great! Pretty good deal for $395 I'd
say. Thanks Joe Befumo for letting me know about it. Also thanks
to everyone else in here for all the information on Vox amps. Now
I have a couple more questions...
First, are there any UK noters out there that could get their hands
on an owner's manual for the AC30? There are a couple of questions
on the features that I need answers for.. Like what is that CUT
knob for? (It's in the "tone" section)
Also, my friend Mark seems to remember that some studio guy he knew
used to use short patch cords to jumper from one set of inputs to
the others in such a way that some incredible sounds were achieved.
I know it sounds kinda weird, patching input jacks to other input
jacks, but the guy that did it runs a 24-track studio, and used
to be a crack keyboard technician. He knows what he's doing,
apparently. Anybody hear of a trick like that?
Also there may be a problem with reverb in this amp. When switched
on, using the footswitch, all you get is a loud (60 Hz) hum--no
reverb. This could be a bad footswitch, or the reverb tank could
be disconnected for some reason, or the reverb could just be fried
(seems unlikely given the pristine condition of the rest of the
amp). Anybody know? Have any clues? Does anybody know if the reverbs
are prone to failure on these amps?
Thanks,
Mike D
|
1033.16 | I used to do this with my old Marshall | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | just cold weather! | Thu Jan 05 1989 13:58 | 5 |
| if you have 2 inputs to the channels you can plug into one channel,
run a cord from the other input (in that channel) to the other channel
and use both simultaniously if the channels are not switched.
dbii
|
1033.17 | Fenders too | RAINBO::WEBER | | Thu Jan 05 1989 14:05 | 3 |
| works great on old Fenders, too.
Danny W
|
1033.18 | I feel like I'm back in school again | MAY26::DIORIO | | Thu Jan 05 1989 14:14 | 16 |
|
But what does it do? Does it make it sound louder, or make it overdrive
easier (more distortion) or what? There are six inputs on the Vox
(3 channel x a High and Low input on each) set up this way:
Brilliant Normal Vibrato <---Channels
o o o <----High inputs
o o o <----Low inputs
What would be the most effective combination(s) to use?
Mike D
|
1033.19 | do it | MARKER::BUCKLEY | I see your sister in her sunday dress | Thu Jan 05 1989 14:31 | 23 |
| > What would be the most effective combination(s) to use?
I'd do this:
Guitar Brilliant Normal Vibrato <---Channels
|
|---------o /-------o o <----High inputs
| / |
o/ o o <----Low inputs
I'd do this at least. This is like the common Marshall strapping
technique. If I could get more gain by strapping from the normal/low
input to the vibrato/high input without the vibrato actually on I'd do
that as well.
What strapping channels does is allow you to EQ your tube distortion.
it doesn't make it any louder, however, you'd have a bright channel
distortion, then a (bass) normal channel tone, etc. You can mix them
together to get a tone. Strap them all together and turn it all
to 10...should sound good.
:^>
|
1033.20 | | MARKER::BUCKLEY | I see your sister in her sunday dress | Thu Jan 05 1989 14:34 | 7 |
|
Just looked over my reply. Note that the High and Low sensitivity
inputs are parallel, so you don't need a patch cord from the high to
the low input (as my picture kind of implied -- sorry). So, you'd plug
the guitar into bright/high, then a short cord from bright/low to
normal/high, then a short cord from normal/low to vib/high. At this
point all three channels should be active.
|
1033.21 | Thanks everybody. More questions later. | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Thu Jan 05 1989 14:42 | 11 |
|
re .19
I remember that in the control section for the vibrato channel,
there was an On/Off switch as well as a speed and intensity knobs.
So it is possible to use the vibrato channel without the vibrato
actually being on.
Thanks for all the suggestions. Will try these combinations.
Mike D
|
1033.22 | ??? | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Fri Jan 06 1989 13:30 | 5 |
|
Does anybody know what the list price was/is for a VOX AC30?
The guy at Liberty Music said $900, but I don't believe him.
Mike D
|
1033.23 | Not Cheap | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Fri Jan 06 1989 15:07 | 5 |
|
Actually, I believe the last officially imported AC30s were about
that. Remember, all tube and UK made means big bucks.
|
1033.24 | Vox.. | HOFNER::MELENDEZ | Duck Flailer's bass... | Fri Jan 06 1989 15:43 | 4 |
| I saw that Vox amp in Liberty music. They told me it is American
made.
|
1033.25 | Do labels lie?? | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Fri Jan 06 1989 16:24 | 4 |
|
It says "Made in England" on the back of it.
Mike D
|
1033.26 | Address and/or phone number for VOX? | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Fri Jan 06 1989 16:26 | 5 |
|
Does anybody have the address or phone number of the closest Vox
distributor here in the US?
Mike D
|
1033.27 | I'd Say It Was British | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Fri Jan 06 1989 16:53 | 6 |
| Re: .25
The US made Voxes said "Made by Thomas Organ Co.", making it pretty
obvious!!!
|
1033.28 | Inflation kills | TROA01::HITCHMOUGH | | Tue Jan 10 1989 12:41 | 9 |
| FWIW my first amp was a VOX AC30 and I picked it up used (great
condition) from a store in Oldham (U.K.) for 45pounds (about $60).
I must admit that it was about 14 years ago, but that's some
inflation!!
Anybody else remember these prices?
Ken
|
1033.29 | Yup | IOSG::CREASY | Smile out loud | Wed Jan 11 1989 06:04 | 7 |
| Ken,
I remember something close to those prices! I think I paid eighty
quid for my AC30 about ten or twelve years ago... sold it for forty
a few years later. Ho hum...
Nick
|
1033.30 | The good old days. | TROA01::HITCHMOUGH | | Wed Jan 11 1989 08:23 | 12 |
| Nick, I'm living in Toronto now, so I have to make do with inflated
North American prices for U.K. stuff (at least I think they're
inflated). What would one go for now? The next time I'm over it
might be worth picking one up used, if you can still get them that
is. It seems to me that the prices are not determined by what it
costs to build, but by what the unsuspecting public is prepared
to fork out. I also remember paying 200 quid for a '64 S.G. and
a 50W marshall stack around the same time. I'd hate to think what
they would cost me now!
Ken
|
1033.31 | | IOSG::CREASY | Smile out loud | Wed Jan 11 1989 10:12 | 12 |
| Ken,
I've no idea what AC30s go for these days. I'll try to look out
a copy of Melody Maker tonight, and see if any are advertised...
> I also remember paying 200 quid for a '64 S.G. and
> a 50W marshall stack around the same time. I'd hate to think what
> they would cost me now!
Don't even ask!!!!!!
Nick
|
1033.32 | Phone numbers of VOX distributors in USA?? | MAY10::DIORIO | | Wed Jan 11 1989 11:11 | 14 |
|
Hey Nick,
can I ask a favor (favour)? I 'd like to get an owner's manual for
the AC30, but I can't locate a VOX distributor over here (Maynard
MA, USA). Is there any way you could either get a manual or find
a phone number for a VOX distributor over here? There used to be
one in Marlboro MA, but they aren't there anymore, and they left
no forwarding address or phone number. I'm trying to avoid making
a long distance phone call to the UK if possible.
Thanks,
Mike D'Iorio
|
1033.33 | Glad to be of assistance! | ROLL::BEFUMO | Rock Troll | Tue Jan 17 1989 11:20 | 4 |
| Yo Mike,
Real glad to hear things worked out! See ya.
joe b
|
1033.34 | | IOSG::CREASY | Smile out loud | Tue Jan 17 1989 11:25 | 19 |
| Hi,
Just a quick note to say I haven't forgotten about Vox - I've found
their address, which for those who are interested is:
Vox Ltd,
8-9 Crystal Way,
The Crystal Centre,
Elmgrove Rd,
Harrow
Middlesex HA1 2YR
I haven't found their phone number yet, but once I have, I'll contact
them to see if they've got old manuals...
Oh, and by the way, I've looked at ads for AC30s, and they seem
to go for between 250 and 350 pounds...
Nick
|
1033.35 | What's the exchange rate? | MAY10::DIORIO | | Tue Jan 17 1989 11:47 | 6 |
|
Thanks Nick. I guess my friend got a good deal at $395 American
for the AC30! I'm glad you haven't forgotten about getting the phone
number.
Mike D
|
1033.36 | Rats! | IOSG::CREASY | Smile out loud | Tue Jan 17 1989 13:27 | 10 |
| With the exchange rate being about 2-1 at the moment, $395 is a
good deal! We have a slight problem with the phone number - directory
enquiries haven't got a number for them... I've had this problem
before with other musical suppliers. Perhaps you'd care to drop
them a line. With a US postmark, it'd probably impress them enough
to send you a photocopy of the relevant manual, if they've got it...
Sorry I can't be more help.
Nick
|
1033.37 | VOX IS TOO COOL...BUT HARD TO FIX | WAV12::FARREN | | Thu Feb 22 1990 11:43 | 16 |
| when i played with the joe perry project, i used two super beatles and
two royal guardsmen. i played through a coloursound overdrive pedal
and always had the "MRB" circut ON.(mid range boost). I thought those
amps sounded great!!! i also had an english ac-50 powering two berkley
cabinets. the super beatles had 4-12 s and two horns, the royal
guardsmen has 2-12s and one horn and the berkley had two tens.
the horns always blew out but i thought it sounded better disconnecting
the horns and passive crossovers and going through speakers only.
the amps were very old and fell apart on the road. i could never find
anone to work on them and they finally had to all be laid to rest.
i still have a one ten vox CAMBRIDGE that needs to be repaired. anyone
know anyone who can fix these things? I'd love to get this up and
running!...i also have a vox 12 string that is so great that i sold my
fender electric 12 and my rickenbacker 12 because it sounded better and
stayed in tune better....and i know that most vox guitars are
interesting looking but not very good guitars..this one is a gem!!
|
1033.38 | VOX Cambridge footswitch | PNO::HEISER | Kitty Hawk fever | Thu Feb 22 1990 14:25 | 9 |
| I also have a VOX Cambridge that needs a footswitch. It doesn't look
like it has any other way of switching channels on it and it is stuck
on clean.
The jack looks like a DIN connector. Anyone know where VOX parts can
be bought in the U.S.? I'll probably end up selling it once I get it
set up.
Mike
|
1033.39 | one of those times I could kick myself | FREEBE::REAUME | rollin' rack! | Mon Mar 12 1990 13:50 | 8 |
| I had a chance to pick up a VOX AC-40 amp head about eight years
ago for $400. It had new tubes and capacitors in it. The guy that
had gutted it and made it fly was Doc Stillwell who used to do
Ritchie Blackmore's boosted Marshalls back in the big DP days.
I played it through a power soak (I know, I know) and a 4 X 12
cab and it was awesome. In retrospect I think $400 was reasonable.
-BoOm-
|
1033.40 | The AC-30 Is Back (Again) | AQUA::ROST | Bad imitation of Rick Calcagni | Mon Aug 20 1990 16:04 | 7 |
| Apparently the VOX AC-30 is being reissued, in the UK at least (the
press release I saw didn't give a US distibutor). They didn't mention
the top boost option, though they would be crazy not to have it, since
that is the most prized version. Available in black or brown
coverings, no prices listed.
Brian
|
1033.41 | VOX Cambridge Reverb schematics | PNO::HEISER | GTS � - $billions$ served! | Wed Nov 21 1990 16:35 | 11 |
| I finally received some info from VOX on my amp today. They don't have
any of the parts in stock, but sent me the schematics for it. If
anyone else has a VOX Cambridge Reverb amp, let me know and I'll send
you a copy.
They also sent me a brochure on the new AC30 reissue and a booklet
telling the history of the AC30.
BTW - They're now owned by Rose Morris & Co., Ltd.
Mike
|
1033.42 | | JUPITR::TASHJIAN | | Thu Feb 14 1991 06:51 | 12 |
| Just for the record, I worked for Pr1mo who was the VOX dist in the
US, in Marlboro. The new Vox AC30's are not the best made, although
Rose Morris is trying hard. Try to find a older (pre-75) unit and have
it fixed up.
If anyone needs any Vox fixed, I have complete schematics of ALL
US/UK (USUK?) items. I've been fixing these things for over 15
years, and will help ya get the pig running. I also re-furbished
the Edge's 2 units on their last U2 tour.
Jay Tashjian
|
1033.43 | Vox replacement | GOES11::G_HOUSE | I wanna be sedated! | Thu Oct 10 1991 14:15 | 8 |
| I noticed something in the new Guitar Player about a company called
Matchless Amplifiers who are making an amp line that's supposed to be
faithful to the design of the AC30.
Two channels, one with Top Boost, one without. List ranges from about
$1500 - $2400. Seems like a lot to me...
Greg
|
1033.44 | | FREEBE::REAUME | SIzzLE on SiX | Fri Oct 11 1991 10:51 | 8 |
| ...and check this out - Matchless makes a rack-mount version of its
AC-30 TB clone!!!! I expected these to be pricey, just like an AC-30.
I SHOULDA bought that AC-40 for $400 when I had a chance 8 years ago.
They are real rare and this one was a Jennings manufactured amp.
FWIW - the Matchless combo amps look Fugly. Finally the M-1000
has some competition in that department!!
-B()()M-
|
1033.45 | Generic | GOES11::G_HOUSE | I wanna be sedated! | Fri Oct 11 1991 12:59 | 3 |
| I'd agree on the cosmetics, really bland lookin in the photo in GP.
gh
|
1033.46 | Peavey/Fender/VOX connection | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Mon Oct 14 1991 13:04 | 7 |
| I read somewhere that the Peavey copy of the Fender 4x10 Bassman is
actually more like an AC30 than a Bassman. Suppossedly, the Peavey
uses the same tubes as an AC30. I doubt they are setup like an AC30
though, as far as running class A with heat shrouds over the power
tubes.
Mark
|
1033.47 | What's up with Peavey ? | FSOA::BKALINOWSKI | | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:21 | 7 |
| My friend just traded his Marshall JTM 45 2x12 combo ( expertly
modified ) and his Midiverb II for a Peavey Classic 4x10 combo.
He said the thing sounds more like a Marshall than his Marshall does.
These are supposedly really hot amps for the money. I have yet to hear
it however.
BK
|
1033.48 | good investment | HAMER::KRON | it's E-Z being Sleazy! | Wed Oct 16 1991 12:36 | 3 |
| Now THAT sounds like a GREAT TRADE!!!!!!
-next thing you know, old Coop will be trading his puke-rack for one!
-Bill B^) x1000
|
1033.49 | | CAVLRY::BUCK | Dances with Timberwolf! | Wed Oct 16 1991 12:44 | 3 |
| >-next thing you know, old Coop will be trading his puke-rack for one!
While this is a very good idea, it'll never happen!
|
1033.50 | Looking to try one out | ELWOOD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Thu Jan 09 1992 10:59 | 2 |
| So, uh, has anybody seen any AC-30Ts around for sale lately here in
the Boston area?
|
1033.52 | | DABEAN::REAUME | currently non-retro | Fri Sep 03 1993 11:40 | 8 |
|
If that's a new one, then that's a CHEAP price. List on the new
AC-30 TB that Korg is distributing is $1,999!!!! Oh, you want the
"Bulldog" speaker option? That'll be $2,499!! Maybe the dealer
markup is 300% so they can either gouge you or dicount the he!! out of
it!
-BOOM-
|
1033.53 | | SAHQ::ROSENKRANZ | C'mon baby, drive south! | Fri Sep 03 1993 11:51 | 4 |
| That price might not be out of line. I saw a new one at a guitar show
with a $1000 price tag on it.
How many watts are those??
|
1033.54 | grrrrr... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | I meant that in the nicest way... | Fri Sep 03 1993 11:51 | 8 |
| >> Oh, you want the "Bulldog" speaker option?
B{0}{0}Mer,
That's *Bull d a w g*, thank you very much......
8^}
|
1033.55 | Plenty enough for a big club | NACAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Fri Sep 03 1993 15:33 | 11 |
| >> How many watts are those??
Assuming they are more or less faithful to the original design, that
would be spec'd at about 33 watts.... 33 VERY VERY LOUD watts.
As mentioned previously, vintage AC-30 TB's from the mid-60s go for
about $1600 or so in very good condition and are built quite nicely.
I can't understand why anyone would pay a huge amount more for a new
one.
Marc
|
1033.57 | AC30 = TONE !!! | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Sun Sep 05 1993 19:36 | 24 |
| AC30's may have limited bells and whistles, but who needs bells and
whistles in an amp, anyways. AC30's are one of the best sounding
guitar amps around, bar none.
The older AC30's had a tendency to perform smoke shows without
warning. It was thought that this was because of the class A
operation and the high temp they run at. I heard that the real
reason is because when they designed the US version to run on
110vac, they chose the wrong transformer. For years, the US
amps have been running with bogus power supplies.
One of the owners of "Matchless" has a repair shop in Boston
and specializes in repairing AC30's. He does a mod to US
AC30's that makes them run right. A friend of mine had the
mod done on his AC30 last time it smoked. The amp ran great
after he got it back. Unfortunately, someone stole it out of
his truck. Major bummer. The mod consists of replacing the
power supply with a British supply that is made to run on the
British power standard (220vac??). He supplies you with a
power convertor that converts the 110vac(60hz) to 220vac (50hz).
The jerk that stole my buddies amp doesn't know this. Chances
are he smoked it right away.
Mark
|
1033.58 | OK, who's got the new AC30? | LEDS::ORSI | GotInAt2WithA10+WokeUpAt10WithA2 | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:54 | 14 |
|
> So, uh, has anybody seen any AC-30Ts around for sale lately here in
> the Boston area?
Re - .50
So Marc, you ended up getting an AC30 Reissue right? How about
a review? Are the EQ controls real funtional? How's the tremolo?
What about Celestions vs the VOX Bulldogs? And whatsit sound like
on 11? %^)
Inquiring-GTS-sufferer
Neal
|
1033.59 | OK | NACAD2::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Mon Jan 10 1994 15:58 | 36 |
| >> So Marc, you ended up getting an AC30 Reissue right? How about
>> a review? Are the EQ controls real funtional? How's the tremolo?
>> What about Celestions vs the VOX Bulldogs? And whatsit sound like
>> on 11? %^)
No, I ended up getting the real thing... circa 1965 gray panel TB.
When I was shopping, I tried a late 70s model I saw in the want ads.
Don't recall whether this was a British or US-made model. Had reverb,
which really sucked. This is the amp that caused me to post the
previous note asking if it was normal for AC30s to be underpowered and
not very trebly. Not a bad amp, but nothing special.
The eq on my '65 are _quite_ functional. There's a brilliant channel
which can shatter teeth with its high end. This channel has bass and
treble eq which make quite a difference. There's a normal channel
with a single "cut" eq control. This channel sounds muffled and
useless by itself, but brings up the bottom and midrange beautifully
when paralleled with the bright channel.
The tremolo sucks. I've tried outboard trem effects and I think they
suck too, so maybe it's just me.
I have no idea what the amp sounds like on 11... never been there. For
big clubs, I run it at about 4 on the brilliant and normal in parallel,
and it is VERY loud.
Overall, I've been ecstatic about this amp every time I've plugged in.
As an aside, I did have a chance to try out the new reissue about two
months ago, only for a short time, but I had a very positive
impression. Seemed to be pretty much like mine... maybe a little bit
less natural compression. But the price for the reissue was the same
as the price for the genuine article. Don't know how well the reissue
is built. The old ones are very rugged in my experience.
|
1033.60 | We need answers! | GOES11::HOUSE | Often imitated, but never duplicated | Mon Jan 10 1994 16:01 | 1 |
| But does it make you sound like Brian May?
|
1033.61 | VOX AC30 TB Reissue | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Jan 11 1994 04:43 | 12 |
| There's a full review of the Vox AC30 TB reissue in a recent edition of
the UK "Guitarist" magazine. I'll bring it in and try to paraphrase
what the reviewer said.
From what I remember, he waxed lyrical about everything but the price
("way beyond the means of the average working class guitarist, who'd be
better advised to look for a vintage AC30 - considerably cheaper,
ironically!"). I think the only other negative comment concerned
misleading labels on the tremolo and reverb knobs, but I could be
wrong.
Dom
|
1033.62 | | LEDS::ORSI | GotInAt2WithA10+WokeUpAt10WithA2 | Tue Jan 11 1994 07:23 | 7 |
|
Re - .59
Thanks Marc. That's what I was looking for.
Neal
|
1033.63 | | KDX200::COOPER | There's a moon in the sky! | Tue Jan 11 1994 21:15 | 8 |
| I was lucky enough to play thru a Vox AC30T (Vintage) at a local
pawn joint - It RIPPED!!!
Then I play thru a re-issue of a AC30T at a local "new gear" joint...
In comparison, it sucked. Lacking in gain and tone. If I had an
extra $1K, I'd pick up the vintage for a practice amp...
jc
|
1033.64 | Run, don't walk. | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Tue Jan 11 1994 21:58 | 7 |
| Coop, if it was only $1K, and it was in good shape, buy it. You can
easily make a cool profit on it. They regularly sell for $2k in
the Boston area.
Mark
|
1033.65 | | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Jan 12 1994 07:49 | 29 |
|
A friend of mine was also disappointed with the AC30 reissue, at least in
comparison to an original AC30 Top Boost from the sixties that he'd played
through.
However, I had another glance at the review that I mentioned in .61 and it was
overwhelmingly positive. This isn't always the case in "Guitarist" either. I've
seen them nail some items in their equipment reviews - they certainly seem more
immune to backhanders than most specialist magazines!
The reviewer stressed that, with regard to the reissue, Vox have made a
sensible compromise between total authenticity and safety/reliability. New
features include a standby switch to protect the valves and larger ventilation
grilles to ensure a better supply of cool air.
His only qualms, apart from the exorbitant retail price of �1050 (with
Celestions), were:
- Re. the "vib-trem" channel, Vox seem to have got the "vibrato" (alternation
in pitch) and "tremolo" (alternation in volume) indicators the wrong way
round!
- The reissue does not offer an intensity control for the tremolo, so the
effect is rather "jagged".
Dom
|
1033.66 | It's traditional | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Seven o'clock and I wanna rock. | Wed Jan 12 1994 09:38 | 7 |
| > - Re. the "vib-trem" channel, Vox seem to have got the "vibrato" (alternation
> in pitch) and "tremolo" (alternation in volume) indicators the wrong way
> round!
That's OK, Fender has insisted on mislabeling the two since the fifties!
Dave
|
1033.67 | | NACAD2::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Wed Jan 12 1994 11:18 | 18 |
| My vintage AC30T does not have an intensity control for the tremolo.
Only the selector between vib and trem and a speed control. By
paralleling this channel in with the normal and brilliant, you can mix
the amount of effect, which accomplishes the "depth" function. BTW -
the trem channel shares the single CUT eq control with the normal
channel and sounds like the normal channel (kinda dull) by itself. I
don't recall whether the vib/trem selector is backwards or not. I just
put it on the setting that sounds less bad.
I am surprised to hear Coop say the reissue sucked compared to a
vintage. As I mentioned, I thought it was fairly close... definitely
didn't come anywhere near sucking. Maybe this wasn't the latest
reissue, but an earlier one??? As for price, the reissue I saw had a
tag of $1500, which is about what vintage units in very good condition
are going for. I would agree that a true vintage unit (red panel or
grey panel) in good condition for $1000 is a steal.
|
1033.68 | I've got two..... | ELIS::PEGG | | Fri Feb 04 1994 05:28 | 26 |
| Hi,
Well I own two Vintage AC-30's, one from the late fifties and one from
the mid-sixties. The younger one is with original blue speakers.
Having read the previous notes on their supposed worth in $$, I think I
may up my insurance cover!
I use one for rehearsal and two live. I don't bother too much with any
of the knobs except for the volume. I equalize using a 2x15 band
graphic, one channel for each amp.
The noise they make is frightening. I can't really stand in front of
them after about volume level 4 without feeling dizzy! I did find it
hard to believe they only produced 33 Watts so a few years back when I
was having one overhauled, I got the guy to check that power to the
speakers. He recorded 180 Watts peak!
To me, they are the only guitar amp worth playing through. I've tried
numerous other makes (Marshall stacks, Fenders Twins, Roland Jazz,
Peavey's) and they don't come near. If you really need to penetrate
through the rest of the band for a solo, this is it! My only worry is
that everytime I plug them in, there will be a blue flash and a
burning smell, but it hasn't happened yet!
Dave Pegg
|
1033.69 | Chance of a lifetime... | PAVONE::TURNER | | Tue Apr 26 1994 10:44 | 40 |
|
Well, I'm off to try out an original AC30 this evening - it's s/hand, but
could be mine for the incredible price of $420 (approx. conversion from
Italian lire)!
It all came about because I happened to pop round to my local music
store a couple of days ago (correction: the *only* music store in the
vicinity) to buy some fluid for cleaning my guitar strings. As I left
the shop, I happened to glance back in through the window...and there
it was staring at me! I was back in in a flash, and the dealer, who I
know a little (I always buy my guitar accessories there) explained that
it was his old amp, and that he'd just decided to fit new valves and
sell it. And it was on sale at 700,000 lire!
The apparent advantages of the deal are countless:
a) It's the amp I've always wanted, but hadn't dared to dream about!
b) AC30s in Italy are few and far between
c) The price would be mouth-watering even back in Britain
d) It's got brand new valves
e) I know and trust the seller (always important)
f) The music shop where I can test it is no more than a minute's drive
from home.
g) The wife seems to have no real objections (well, I've spent little
or nothing for a few months now, and I *did* paint the garage last
Saturday!)
Only snag (and the wife's only possible objection): where do I put it?
Space in our flat is really at a premium now - I really am struggling
to think where I can stuff it.
Anyone know the exact measurements (yes, every millimetre is precious!)
and weight of an AC30 TB?
I'll let you know how it goes.
Dom
Only snag
|
1033.70 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Tue Apr 26 1994 10:58 | 6 |
| Given the conditions you list, I don't think I'd have even left the
shop without having the thing in my hand. As far as space, if it was
something I needed that bad, I'd keep it in my car, under my kitchen
table, use it as a coffee table, or whatever!
Greg
|
1033.71 | | LEDS::BURATI | keep talking | Tue Apr 26 1994 11:59 | 1 |
| Current Lark Street flyer lists a 1964 AC30 Top Boost for $1800.
|
1033.72 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | I Got You Babe (Slight Return) | Tue Apr 26 1994 13:04 | 9 |
| I don't have any good ideas for where to stash it, but if you do go for
it and it's somewhat underfoot think about getting a cover for it.
There's a U.S. firm called Tuki that makes nice padded cordura covers for
vintage amps; they'll do everything, even custom shapes, but I'm sure
they've already done bunches of AC30s.
btw, nice hunting. Congratulations!
/rick
|
1033.73 | | BIGQ::DCLARK | Good Gali Miss Mali | Tue Apr 26 1994 13:11 | 1 |
| you can store it at my house for a while if you want.
|
1033.74 | | NACAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Tue Apr 26 1994 13:25 | 7 |
| Either the dealer has no clue what the amp is worth, there's no market
for AC30s around your way, there's something very wrong with the amp,
it's not an original AC30... whatever, because that price is WAY low.
Upwards of $2K is the going rate in the USA for vintage AC30s in very
good condition.
But crank it a little and if it grabs you, grab it.
|
1033.75 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Tue Apr 26 1994 14:38 | 8 |
| Interestingly enough, I was at a local shop today picking up a repair
item and they'd just gotten a little Cambridge Reverb combo in on
trade. It's a single channel 1x12 solid state combo with reverb and
tremelo. This one was in mint condition and had a pretty cool sound.
Anyone know what these things typically sell for?
Greg
|
1033.76 | I shall now sit on my wallet for 18 months... | PAVONE::TURNER | | Wed Apr 27 1994 09:43 | 33 |
| re: last few
Thanks, all of you, for your advice and encouragement.
Well, I went for it (as if there was ever going to be any doubt!). I still
can't offer any real explanation as to why the guy was prepared to sell at such
a low price. To give you an idea of the sort of deal I got, I paid 700,000
Italian lire; the Vox AC30 TB Reissue lists here at an astounding 2,950,000
lire!
I played through it for about an hour last night, and it totally lived up to
expectations. The owner told me that he had gigged solidly over the last 7/8
years with it and pushed it pretty hard too. However, he's always taken good
care of it (the only sign of wear is the white taping around the speaker grille
which is coming loose at one point), especially when transporting it to and
from gigs. Even the footswitch for the vibrato/tremolo channel has the real
vintage look to it.
Incidentally, the guy did make one modification: one of the inputs to the
vibrato/tremolo channel has been replaced by a tone control. Apparently, in
normal circumstances, the bass, treble and cut controls can only be used on the
brilliant channel (anyone like to confirm/deny that?)
Anyway, I'll be round to pick it up at the weekend. I've left it with the owner
for a couple more days while we create space for it in the house (it's
touch-and-go whether we sell the washing machine, the fridge or the cooker
;-)).
Dom
P.S. I shall certainly be taking up the advice about buying a cover -
although it'll take more than that to protect it from my two-year old
daughter!
|
1033.77 | Congrats | NACAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Wed Apr 27 1994 10:50 | 17 |
| >> Even the footswitch for the vibrato/tremolo channel has the real
>> vintage look to it.
Sorta-breast-shaped grey metal thing with rubber bottom, right?
Charming, isn't it? How about other details... what color grille?
Greenish, reddish, tan? What coler control panel? Grey?
>> Apparently, in normal circumstances, the bass, treble and cut
>> controls can only be used on the brilliant channel (anyone like
>> to confirm/deny that?)
The bass and treble affect the brilliant channel, the cut affects the
normal and trem/vib channels. Try driving the brilliant and normal
channels in parallel. First get a nice trebly sound on the brilliant
channel with the normal volume off, then raise the normal volume to
give it more mid and low punch. You can get a very wide variety of
sounds this way.
|
1033.78 | | PAVONE::TURNER | | Thu Apr 28 1994 06:37 | 43 |
|
>Sorta-breast-shaped grey metal thing with rubber bottom, right?
>Charming, isn't it?
That's the one - nothing like any other footswitch I've ever seen!
>How about other details... what color grille? Greenish, reddish, tan?
>What coler control panel? Grey?
Well, I'll try and post some sort of review next week; I still haven't
brought the beast home so I'm mainly going on memory here! I think the
grille was black or dark grey (or maybe just needed cleaning!). The
control panel was dark grey.
>The bass and treble affect the brilliant channel, the cut affects the
>normal and trem/vib channels. Try driving the brilliant and normal
>channels in parallel. First get a nice trebly sound on the brilliant
>channel with the normal volume off, then raise the normal volume to
>give it more mid and low punch. You can get a very wide variety of
>sounds this way.
Any more advice of this sort would be much appreciated. I only played
through it for about 40 mins; call me ignorant, but I was under the
impression that each channel was totally autonomous/separate...hence
the individual volume controls. So I'm a bit confused by this talk of
operating the amp in parallel.
Do you have any tips about maintenance? I've played through valve amps
before (Soldano and Carvin, mainly), but never actually owned one. The
owner said that he replaced the valves a couple of months ago, but he
only did it for the hell of it, i.e. the amp showed no signs of needing
revalving! I know the AC30 TB reissue has a standby switch, which the
original doesn't have. Is there anything basic I should do to avoid
sending it up in smoke?
Even hints about transporting it would be helpful too. It's lighter
than I expected (though I'm glad my block of flats has got a lift!),
but I really want to look after this amp right from the start. God
knows, s/he's probably as old as I am!
Thanks a lot,
Dom
|
1033.79 | | LEDS::BURATI | What the HEY HEY HEY | Thu Apr 28 1994 10:57 | 3 |
| Cool snarf, Dom. Congrats.
--Ron
|
1033.80 | | NACAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Thu Apr 28 1994 11:06 | 34 |
| Grey panels are mid-60s, I think.
Then channels are separate... I'm suggesting driving them in parallel
(e.g., with a Y-cable). You can also try plugging into the brillint
high and running a short cord from brilliant low to normal high (or
other combinations). I found this to be noisy. Since I use
an effects processor with stereo outputs (but never use any stereo
effects on stage), I just run the left output to the brilliant channel
and the right output to the normal channel. After setting up the
brilliant channel to sound nice, bring up the normal channel volume
and listen to the effect. The sound changes quite a bit as you vary
the mix between the two channels. Then again, this is how I use it...
you may prefer just running the brilliant channel. I think you'll
agree that the normal channel is useless by itself, though.
Another thing to try is to feed the amp a pretty hot signal. You
can overload the input stages just a bit and it can sound good
that way. Again, this is easy for me because I can jack up the output
of my effect processor. I once played a friend's Les Paul direct into
it which had very hot pickups, and it sounded great.
I haven't maintained my AC30 at all other than cosmetic and mechanical
(gluing vinyl, replacing rubber feet, etc.). But I've only had it
about two years, gig only about twice a month, and don't use it in
rehearsals (we rehearse using headphones... everything direct to a
mixing board). At a gig I turn it on early and leave it on all night.
Don't put anything blocking the three heat vents on top. Don't spill
drinks or pancake batter down the vents either.
I own a padded amp cover... cost about $60. I always carry
the amp by the two outside handles... never by the single middle
handle. I learned to do this when the middle handle broke and the
amp fell down a flight of stairs after putting a hole in the wall.
The handle was probably defective, but I'll never risk it again.
|
1033.81 | | DABEAN::REAUME | click -- buzz -- whirr | Thu Apr 28 1994 14:50 | 13 |
|
I have the Vox Book and it has a lot of AC30 info as well as the
whole line of amps through the years. It really is a fairly interesting
book since the company went through so many changes over the years.
There's plenty of pictures of their endorsees as well.
One of the more interesting pieces was regarding the best known
Vox endorsees, the Beatles. Brian Epstein had Vox replace the old AC15's
that the Beatles used in their early days (Cavern CLub) with new
AC30's. The only payment was the AC15's in trade and a verbal agreement
that the Beatles would ALWAYS use Vox amps.
-JohnR-
|
1033.82 | | NACAD2::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Fri Apr 29 1994 08:37 | 9 |
| >> The only payment was ... a verbal agreement that the Beatles
>> would ALWAYS use Vox amps.
Which they didn't, of course. Unclear when the switch happened.
Probably in 1967 or later, they were using fender amps. Still, I
think Vox got a reasonable deal on that one.
On a similar note, I doubt Rickenbacker regrets supplying the Beatles
with instruments.
|
1033.83 | | LEDS::BURATI | What the HEY HEY HEY | Fri Apr 29 1994 09:21 | 10 |
| > On a similar note, I doubt Rickenbacker regrets supplying the Beatles
> with instruments.
Nor Ludwig. Bill Ludwig III told me that Ludwig sold umpteen thousand
million of those gray pearloid kits. Of course if you were paying
attention back then you didn't need a Ludwig to tell you that to figure
it out. All you needed was a drummer friend that was trying to order
one in '65 or '66. "Backordered how many months?"
--Ron
|
1033.84 | Guitarist magazine dedicated to Vox | VARESE::SACHA::IDC_BSTR | Oh no! NOT Milan Kundera again! | Tue Feb 28 1995 05:24 | 17 |
| This month's edition of the Guitarist magazine has a superb series of
articles (about 30 pages) dedicated to Vox. Sure, most of them deal
with the Vox AC30, but there are some interetsing snippets of
information about the "other" Vox amps (AC15, Cambridge, the AC30s
made by the Thomas Organ Co. in the U.S.), Vox foot pedals, and Vox
guitars (including the infamous Vox organ guitar).
There's a full interview with the bloke who developed the AC30 (name
escapes me at the moment), quotes from famous users (everyone from Hank
Marvin to George Harrison to Bryan Adams to Brian May), an article
about the legendary blue speakers, and loads of anecdotes and pictures.
If you are already the proud owner of an AC30, or you are interested in
buying one, I'd say this edition is a must.
Dom
|
1033.85 | Time to mix it! | VARESE::SACHA::IDC_BSTR | Oh no! NOT Milan Kundera again! | Thu Mar 30 1995 05:10 | 18 |
| Although a new note was recently created concerning AC30 valves (note
3060), I thought I'd better enter this in here (the stock Vox AC30
note!).
I thought it was about time I had a crack at the parallel channel
mixing trick (using patch cords) that most AC30 owners seem to try sooner
or later. It's very well described in here (notes .19, .20, .77, and
.80), but I've still got a couple of queries:
1) Can anyone confirm that there are no damaging side-effects to the
amp?
2) Are patch cords commercially available for doing the job, or am I
best advised to ask someone to make me some? (Before you mention
it, I don't think *I'm* up to the job!)
Thanks for your help,
Dom
|
1033.86 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | more zip stupid juice | Thu Mar 30 1995 08:08 | 11 |
| There's nothing magical about the chords; just use spare guitar chords
to try the effect out. If it's something you think you'll want to do
all the time, or onstage, etc. then you may want to invest in some
shorter chords just to keep the clutter down. There are commercially
available ones, commonly used for chaining effects boxes together.
Music Emporium, for example, sells a pack of 6 for $10.
I've never tried this on a Vox, but I have done it on old 4-input
Marshalls and dual channel Fenders with no ill effects.
/rick
|
1033.87 | can't hurt to try | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Thu Mar 30 1995 08:52 | 5 |
| Same here.I sometimes run a patch from my 'bright' channel to my 'bass'
channel on my Bassman.Sounds pretty neat,kinda throws in a little more
mid's.
-kev
|
1033.88 | | NETCAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Thu Mar 30 1995 09:03 | 17 |
| I've been paralleling channels in every way imaginable for quite some
time and have never had any problem whatsoever. Right now I happen to
have a Korg A4 with stereo outputs... I send one output to the
brilliant channel and the other to the normal channel. As mentioned,
there's nothing special about the cables, regular or "Y", which you'd
used to parallel channels.
Since my last posting, I've broken _another_ handle. This time, I was
carrying the amp by the two outside handles and one of them still
broke. At least the amp didn't take a trip down the stairs this time,
as I was still holding it by the other handle. I've completely lost
faith in the plastic reissue handles. I've recently learned that Vox
offers leather reissue handles... I may check these out soon. Wouldn't
be at all surprised to find a set of three costing over $100.
Marc
|
1033.89 | try other brands leather | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Thu Mar 30 1995 09:31 | 7 |
| Marc,
If the Vox price for handles is high try checking out the Crate Vintage
Club or the Peavey Clasic series handles. They are leather and I bet
they will fit right on your Vox amp.
Mark
|
1033.90 | By all means go for Peavey handles if they're cheaper... | VARESE::SACHA::IDC_BSTR | Oh no! NOT Milan Kundera again! | Thu Mar 30 1995 09:48 | 11 |
| Personally, I think $100 for three leather handles is a bit steep; this
reissue business is really getting ridiculous.
To think that back in the sixties, the Vox AC30 was considered to be
*the* working man's amp. Practically every '60s beat group used either
Vox or Selmer (which were cheaper still).
So I wonder what Vox would now charge for an amp cover (with the Vox
logo sprayed all over it)...
Dom
|
1033.91 | On my to-do list | NETCAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Thu Mar 30 1995 11:26 | 3 |
| I haven't actually priced the handles... just guessing based on about
$20 each for the plastic ones. What I _should_ do is complain.
Handles breaking even when I'm carrying using two handles is BS.
|
1033.92 | | DABEAN::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Sat Apr 22 1995 14:01 | 10 |
|
North Coast Music in MN sells AC30T re-issues for $1285 with
"greenback" speakers and ~$1585 with the Vox "blues". A used
AC50 can be had for around $675. This place also carries a full
line of Vox spares including the famous inflated $ leather handles.
In some ways I think the price is high, but Voxes do hold their
valuse better than most amps.
|
1033.93 | If I buy - they'll go outta biz like KH | FREEBE::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Fri Apr 28 1995 10:34 | 15 |
|
I'm getting real close on picking one of these up. I'm interested in
having one amp that's "different" from the rack and whatever other
piece of gear I happen to not sell.
I tried an AC30TB at the House of Guitars a litte over a year ago.
I loved the amp, hated the >$2000 price. Now that I know I can get one
in the $1200 range, I've got my GTS again.
It does seem that a few other manufacturers have gone after this
AC30 image thing recently. Bedrock tried it a while back. Of course
there's Matchless at the real high-end. And I notied a Laney at
Acton Music that was very VOXish. And now Marshall (shudder) has
a 30 watt tube combo that even though it doesn't look the part is
right in the same power/size ratio.
I say - take a 30 watter and CRANK IT!
|
1033.94 | an amp with a history | FREEBE::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Tue May 02 1995 13:27 | 40 |
| This was originally a short memo to Buckmeister since he mentioned to me that
he never really checked into VOX. Given that the AC30 has been around for
35 years (!) and that my "short" memo turned into a quick history lesson
I figured I'd post it here.
From: DABEAN::REAUME 2-MAY-1995 09:40:26.33
To: REAUME ! FILE COPY
CC:
Subj: vox
You've lived a sheltered life Buck! VOX defined the British guitar sound in
the sixties and still has a lot of viability today. The book I showed you gives
a lot of insight into the ups and downs of VOX. Of course the Beatles were the
most visible endorsee for VOX, but numerous other bands made use of their gear.
In more recent years it's been U2, Tom Petty, and Bryan Adams that have been
Vox users. The VOX book also gives a lot of credit to Brian May of Queen
that has been a steadfast AC30 user (he typically has about nine of them set up.
on stage).
The reason the Vox amps originally died out in the early seventies were:
1) hard rock bands started using higher power amps. Bands like Cream,
Vanilla Fudge, and the Jimi Hendrix experience were extolling virtues of
the Marshall stack. Bands in those days played off the stage and PA systems
were mostly used exclusively for vocals (a soundman's nightmare). Anyone
with a 30 watt AC30 just couldn't "keep up" with a Marshall stack.
2) VOX was one of the purveyors of solid state. These assumed that musicians
would appreciate the lighter weight, lower maintenance, and lower cost of a
solid state amp. In fact they risked their reputation on it. All at a time
when the AC30 tube amp was considered one of the better sounding amps. It is
the only VOX model to withstand the test of time!
3) VOX made an agreement with Thomas Organ company in the US to manufacture
and market VOX amps. The US models bore NO resemblance to the British AC30's
and many American VOX buyers were perplexed as to why their VOX amps didn't
sound that great. They were TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT AMPS built on different
sides of the Atlantic. The only thing in common was the NAME! Any of the books
from Groove Tubes (the tube amp book) point this out. As a matter of fact,
Aspen Pittman wrote that the AC30TB was possibly the best amp ever made!
I'll have more to say after the acid test (like about a month gigging with
the AC30). Since I've made my first retro move, it might as well a big one!
CC: BVILLE::REAUME
|
1033.95 | | NETCAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Wed May 03 1995 08:39 | 5 |
| Excellent choice! ;^)
Did you get a vintage unit or a reissue?
Marc
|
1033.96 | | FREEBE::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Wed May 03 1995 09:10 | 15 |
|
Mine is the re-issue from Korg - even though there probably is more
appeal to a pre-'64 "JMI" built VOX, the re-issues that Korg is
distributing is the most faithful re-issue in terms of quality and
staying with the original design. They are using the GZ34 rectifier
tube. The re-issues for the eighties used bridge rectifiers and
that affects the tonal character. They offer the choice of Celestion
greenbacks or big bucks for the Vox "blue" speakers (~$300 more!).
I went with the greenbacks.
Marc - where do you normally have your volume. I'm excited about
having a 30 watt amp instead of a fire-breathing 100 watter, just
to get the power tube overdrive. I might end up with a Korg A4 like
you have. In any case whatever I use for effects will have a built in
tuner and possibly the ext control outs so I can still use it with
my REXX gear.
|
1033.97 | | NETCAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Wed May 03 1995 11:27 | 35 |
| My usual setup is to drive both the brilliant and normal channels from
the stereo outputs of the A4. I then set the volume of the brilliant
channel to about what the particular club/stage will take. Normally
pretty low... about 3-5. Tone on the brillint channel has bass at
about 3 and treble at about 8. [At least I think the bass is on 3.
Can't remember if this knob is "backwards" or not. I know the treble
is on 8 as in "almost maximum treble setting" and I also know that the
bass and treble knobs point away from each other in my setup, so that
should nail it.]
Then I bring up the normal channel volume to boost the mids and lows
to taste. Tone, er... "cut" on the normal channel varies from almost
full bass (1.0001) to some treble added (3). I use the A4's output
level control afterwards to adjust overall level. Usually keep it
pretty low or else the Vox is screaming if I move the volume controls
off 1 at all.
Using this setup, the amp is incredibly sensitive to the settings of
the normal channel, both volume and cut. Changing either just a bit
takes it through a variety of tones. My overall tone probably isn't
terribly consistent because of this... I get a "tone for the night" but
it always sound great for my needs.
My setup is completely clean. I never get the amp loud enough or drive
it hard enough to overdrive either the input or output stages. Getting
loud enough to overdrive the output is out of the question with my band's
stage volume. I've been thinking of ways to overdrive the input but
without channel switching, I'd be adjusting the knobs all night to switch
sounds... or else think of some external thing to do the equivalent.
By the way, I've demoed the Korg reissue and found it very faithful to
my '65. Congrats! Don't forget to carry it by the two outside
handles!
Marc
|
1033.98 | 35 year old design works for me! | FREEBE::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Fri May 05 1995 13:06 | 12 |
|
Well - I'll be a VOXman this weekend! The amp is in and I got about
20 minutes to mess with it during lunch today (had to eat quick!).
WOW - It's really a FULL sounding amp, as good as I remember! Which
is nice not to be dissapointed. I did manage to break over into a
nice distortion just past 12 o'clock on the normal channel volume,
I think the brilliant channel starts earlier.
The music store crew were pretty much as excited about this amp as I
was. This is the first one they sold, they are considering stocking one
after hearing this one! I'm actually surprised at how loud 33 watts can
be. More to come, but I think this is going to be a positive
experience overall.
|
1033.99 | done deal | DABEAN::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Sun May 07 1995 10:23 | 36 |
| After doing my initial experimentation with the VOX AC30TB Friday evening
and Saturday afternoon I decided it was worth bringing the new amp out on
Saturday's gig. After playing straight into the amp for awhile and really
getting some impressive overdrive but at fairly loud levels, I then tried
feeding the signal direct from my MIDI rack (sans power amp) into the
normal channel of the AC30. WOW ! Not only does it work, but it sounds
incredible! I wasn't sure how the ACCESS would work with the AC30, or if
it would "kill" the character of a vintage amp. I'm not talking subtle sound
difference from when I use the Rocktron Velocity power amp and EV speakers
(not that they sound bad at all), but a major tonal change with a LOT of
responsiveness and power tube crunch. Screw the DI on the ACCESS, I want the
sound coming out of the VOX to be what comes out the house system.
It actually saves on my set-up time with the rack feeding the AC30.
I thought I might need something like the H & K Tubeman plus that has a
specific "to guitar amp" jack, but I can't see changing anything since the
ACCESS works so well. I tried a few of the various $300 t0 $600 effects units
that are all integrated into foot controller, but absolutely none of them
matched the ACCESS/Intellifex (although I will admit some are good deals since
you get a lot of features like built in tuners and headphone outs).
I've tried the channel patching (brilliant/normal) and it works well.
I messed with the tremelo and vibrato and was impressed with its true to
vintage sounds although I don't see myself using it much. Other observations
after my first two days with the AC30TB, it is a little bigger than I
remembered from before, but then again I didn't pick it up and move it back
then. It is not light, the shipping carton said 84 lbs (reminds me of all the
Fender Twin jokes). It is built very well with particular attention to detail.
As a matter of fact my documentation states that the only changes to the
original 1963 AC30/6-TB design is larger ventilation slots on the top and
an improved mains transformer section that cuts down on 60 cycle hum that some
the 1960's models had. All the tubes including the GZ34 rectifier are original.
So now my main performance rig is a combination of the 90's meets the 60's.
The only addition I can see is a nice road case on wheels to keep the amp in
like new condition and to raise it a little higher off the floor for better
projection on stage. All in all I'm happy with my trip into a time warp with
this amp.
|
1033.100 | | DABEAN::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Sun May 07 1995 10:27 | 8 |
|
Oh Yeah - .100! - Don't expect the thousands though since I don't
think there's going to be a fire sale on VOX gear (If there is, I'll be
there!) At least the AC30 has 35 years of history backing it up!
FWIW - the designer of these amps was Dick Denney who worked with
Jennings Musical Instruments. He did something right!
|
1033.101 | Curious... | NETCAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Sun May 07 1995 13:10 | 8 |
| Out of curiosity, would you say that the normal channel has adequate
high-end when used by itself?
On my amp, if I run into the normal channel, I need to boost the highs
with an external EQ. It just doesn't have enough sparkle if I run
straight in. The brilliant channel has screaming treble all alone.
Marc
|
1033.102 | | DABEAN::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Sun May 07 1995 16:34 | 13 |
|
It seems to me (so far) that the brilliant channel really has the
extra gain built in, which is why I defaulted to the normal channel
from the line out of the ACCESS. When using the normal channel I
believe the only tone control that's active is the cut knob. I didn't
have any problem getting the high-end tones using the normal channel
in my add-on configuration, but I'll admit that when I was doing the
guitar right into the amp I preferred the brilliant channel.
I'll have to experiment some more. I was happy with what I got out
the set-up I used on a gig last night, so much so that I decided not to
mess with anything.
|
1033.103 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Mon May 08 1995 00:18 | 3 |
| I'm tellin' ya BooM, plug that ACCESS into a Marshall or Boogie
all-tube power amp, and you'll be in nirvana...
:-)
|
1033.105 | | DABEAN::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Mon May 08 1995 08:29 | 14 |
|
Here's another (keep trying this one on the wife) cost justification
scenario. A decent tube power will run me anywhere from $500 on the low
end (Peavey, Carvin) up to $1000-1500 on the high-end (Marshall,Boogie,
VHT). Then you need quality speakers. And you can't use the power amp and
speakers without a preamp (already got a few of those, but if I didn't
I'd have to buy one). So the AC30TB covers the power amp/speakers area
quite well AND sounds great with just using straight guitar (OK, maybe
a chorus stomp).
I don't deny that a lot of the re-issues from Fender and Peavey
sound very good and cover the retro thing real well. The AC30TB has
just enough difference in it's circuitry to justify (in my mind anyway)
the additional cost.
|
1033.106 | | DABEAN::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Sat May 27 1995 10:44 | 14 |
| I went out to check out a local act last night and the guitar player
used (drum roll) an AC30. I got a chance to chat with him before they
started adn got some neat info. The guitar player, Mark Doyle, has TWO
AC30TB's and to make it even more interesting they are both original
1963! He had the vinyl replaced so they look brand new. I told him I
have a reissue and he mentioned that the latest reissues are pretty
true to the original. He mentioned playing some from ten years ago that
weren't that great.
I checked out the top of the amp - yup it's a JMI amp (where mine
says "a VOX" product) and has the original thin plastic vents. I
mentioned that mine has wider vents. He front ends the amp with a
Digitech GSP-21 but I really didn't hear a lot of effects in his
sounds, definitely not factory presets!
|
1033.107 | 'Dazed and Confused' | WOTVAX::FISHWICKJ | | Mon Jun 12 1995 06:31 | 36 |
| Just picked up an AC30T from my mate and am trying it out with a
view to buying it. Problem is I plugged it in last night and there must
be something wrong with it cos it looks and sounds awful.
Here's a summary of my problems with this amp , any advice on any
of these points would be much appreciated....
1) I was told that this is an original 1964 AC30t ,it has the blue
speakers and a browny red speaker cover but it doesnt look like any of
the photo's I have of the amp. The vents ( 3 very thin ) have metal
trims not plastic . The corners of the amp have metal chrome covers and
not black. The black covering is very shabby and is not the same style
all over the amp. I know this thing is old but it looks awful.
2) Where should the input be for the footswitch , on this one its right
in the middle of a wooden panel on the back of the amp. This may be an
add on but again its very shoddy looking.
3) Is the back panel supposed to come off to get access to the guts of
the machine ,cos it wont ,all the screws are goosed ,is there another
way in.
4) Its got the 2 side handles but no middle handle.
5) When its on its got this awful hum ,now I know these old amps tend
to hum but is there any kind of modification to stop this.
6) finally , I dont think the brilliant channel works , its just far
too quiet and distorted , the vibrato doesnt seem to work either.
Is there anything I can do about these problems ,what am I looking
for to check if the tubes are bust.
I thought this was a good deal at first , only 400 quid , and it
still could be if its gonna be cheap to repair , but I could do with
some help befors I haul it into somewhere decent to check it out.
J..
|
1033.108 | | DABEAN::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Mon Jun 12 1995 09:16 | 14 |
|
I'm not exactly sure what version of AC30T you've got there. Does it
say "a JMI product" on the control panel. Early 60's original AC30's
should say that as well as have plastic vents with VOX lettered on
them.
The blue speakers are usually a good sign, but I can't be sure since
you mentioned a few things have been modified. Can you see inside,
along with (4-5) ECC83 preamp tubes (small) there should be four EL84
power tubes (medium) and one big GZ34 rectifier tube.
Also the chassis is connected to the outer frame by four screws on
the outer sides of the amp. Be sure of the chassis position before
popping out the mounting screws.
If you know a qualified amp tech, it might be nice to have a check
out done on the amp, the only downside is that could change the price!
|
1033.109 | Sounds like it needs work | NETCAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Mon Jun 12 1995 09:43 | 35 |
| Sounds beat up, but that's just cosmetic. Your description also makes
it sound like lots of non-original parts, but that will just lower the
price for you! You do, however, care very much whether it's working
properly or not.
>> Where should the input be for the footswitch...
On mine, it's hardwired in. No input.
>> Is the back panel supposed to come off to get access to the guts of
>> the machine ,cos it wont ,all the screws are goosed...
No sure what you mean by goosed... The "back panel" is actually the
back panel of a shelf which holds the entirety of the amplifier, minus
the case and speakers. On mine, it is held in by six screws, I
believe. Four at the corners and two along the top. That's the way in
to the guts.
>> When its on its got this awful hum ,now I know these old amps tend
>> to hum but is there any kind of modification to stop this.
Mine is pretty much original to the best of my knowledge. It isn't
whisper quiet... you can tell it's on without playing. But it is by no
means awful or anything close. Sounds like there's something wrong
electrically, as opposed to needing a mod.
>> finally , I dont think the brilliant channel works , its just far
>> too quiet and distorted...
Something is definitely wrong here. That brilliant channel should make
you smile real wide.
I second the recommendation to get it checked out by a good amp tech.
Marc
|
1033.110 | I got those AC30T Blues?? | WOTVAX::FISHWICKJ | | Mon Jun 12 1995 10:54 | 9 |
| Thanks....
I'll try and get inside tonite and have a look , what I mean by
goosed is that 2 of the screws wont actually come out ,the thread on 2
of them which is straight into the wood is falling apart and the other
2 screws just seem to turn half way round each way and then stop ,just
cant work out how to get in without breaking the back piece of wood.
The spakers are definetely original and it does say JMI Produst on
the control panel but even the panel seems very shoddy.
|
1033.111 | | DABEAN::REAUME | It's what's happening ...again | Mon Jun 12 1995 13:48 | 7 |
| The good news is that you CAN get parts for these amps. The new
VOX AC30TB amps are being built right in the Marshall factory! Here
in the US there are a few specialty shops that handle vintage as well
as reissue VOX amps. Those blue speakers are worth an extra $500 US to
the list price of the reissue amps, so keep that in mind!
I would use any deficiencies to help with haggling on the price!
|
1033.112 | boo-hoo | WOTVAX::FISHWICKJ | | Thu Jun 15 1995 07:43 | 9 |
| Well , I cant buy the AC30 but I still need some info for the guy
whose selling it. When he brought the amp round to mine he said the
brilliant chanel was working ok. Now the brill chanel is not working ,
he said the amp might have taken a bump cos in the past he,s had to
replace the same tube when he dropped the amp (the brill channel has a
severe drop in volume).
Personnaly I think it must be something else causing this problem ,
has anyone got any suggestions.
jzm
|
1033.113 | | FREEBE::REAUME | actually working on Win95! | Sat Aug 26 1995 22:50 | 13 |
|
OK - After one weekend of using the old rack for a couple gigs,
I went back to the AC30TB. Even though I couldn't crank it past
about 10:00 on the vol dial, it still sounded real good to me.
It's been over three months since I cleared out the KH gear and
went for a true vintage re-issue amp. I really am happy with the
VOX and my guess is that I'm relatively equipment stable.
The only thing that would have changed things happened after I
already had my mind and money set on the AC30 was that AMPEG jumped on
the re-issue bandwagon and brought back the JET and REVERB-O-ROCKET.
I wouldn't have minded trying one of these since I used to be a
Ampeg die hard. But, what's done is done.
|
1033.114 | | FREEBE::REAUME | vintage racker | Mon Sep 18 1995 12:48 | 12 |
|
The recent issue of Vintage Guitar magazine has an article titled
Vintage Vox tune-up.It covers many of the early sixties amps such as
AC10, AC15, and of course AC30's. The article is written by Ken Fisher
of Trainwreck amps. He has been working on Voxes for years and builds
his own line of amps which have a lot of Vox traits.
He mentions that original AC30's are prone to overheating problems
due to the size of the top vents, later AC30's doubled up on the vents
and the Korg re-issue (such as the one I have) use a whole new vent
design so it's not a problem.
This magazine has tons of ads for vintage guitars and amps. Some of
the prices are astronomical!
|
1033.115 | | DABEAN::REAUME | vintage racker | Fri Oct 27 1995 07:27 | 7 |
|
One of the better prices I've seen on a Vox AC30TB re-issue (Korg)
is in one of my local stores. They have one on sale for $1199. Most of
the prices I've seen have been $1350-1500. Still not cheap, but this is
a new amp.
|
1033.116 | | FREEBE::REAUME | vintage racker | Mon Nov 13 1995 14:15 | 11 |
|
OK - here's a somewhat informative VOX homepage:
http://www.pacific.net/~xibalba/vox/vox.html
It has info on the British and Americaan VOX amps as well guitars,
effects, and organs. There is also a VOX 7140 homepage, but that is
dedicated to just one model, I'll have to dig out the URL.
--
|
1033.117 | Looks very appetizing though... | TRNUX1::IDC_BSTR | Oh no! NOT Milan Kundera again! | Wed Nov 15 1995 07:14 | 6 |
| >http://www.pacific.net/~xibalba/vox/vox.html
Is this page already active? I've tried accessing it
several times in the last couple of days, without success.
Dom
|
1033.118 | | FREEBE::REAUME | vintage racker | Wed Nov 15 1995 12:49 | 8 |
|
Sorry about that, I had no problem connecting. The problem is that
I missed a small segment of the URL. TRY:
http://www.pacificnet.net/~xibalba/vox/vox.html
I double checked this one before re-entering it. ENJOY!
|
1033.119 | The Lost vox | BSS::MANTHEI | Just another outta work guitar player | Wed Nov 15 1995 16:45 | 4 |
| What if you look in the Vox pages, but don't see your model?
Does that make it rare - or just junk.....
/=\
|
1033.120 | | DABEAN::REAUME | vintage racker | Thu Nov 16 1995 17:31 | 15 |
|
What model are you talking? I have the VOX book which has a really
thorough listing of various models both British and American.
BTW - I have the URL for the other homepage (VOX 7120) is:
http://www.microweb.com/dwayne/beat.html
Apparently the 7120 (tube power/transistor preamp) is one of the
rarer models that VOX ever produced. Tonal quality is not as good as
AC30's or even AC50's. It was built in 1966 when the transition was
being made to a total solid state design. The total production was
around 100 units and they ran $1,500 at the time (a lot of dough in
'66).
|
1033.121 | Keep 'em coming! | SACHA::IDC_BSTR | Oh no! NOT Milan Kundera again! | Fri Nov 17 1995 03:16 | 4 |
| Thanks a lot for these web pages, DABEAN::REAUME (I don't know your
name). I'll certainly have a butcher's just as soon as I get time.
Dom
|
1033.122 | | CTPCSA::GOODWIN | | Fri Nov 17 1995 07:01 | 5 |
|
His name is B{}{}M, aka John, formerly Orville. :-)
/Wilbur
|
1033.123 | | BSS::MANTHEI | Just another outta work guitar player | Fri Nov 17 1995 09:58 | 6 |
| It was actually one of the guitars that I couldn't find in the detailed
listing. The picture of the guitar on the main page is the one I have,
but not listed under "hollowbody teardrops". It's the 12 string
3-pickup model with whammy.. Bizarre setup.
/=\
|
1033.124 | It's what's happening, again! | FREEBE::REAUME | vintage racker | Wed Nov 22 1995 14:50 | 15 |
|
I am amazed at how many guitars VOX offered over the years. There is
quite an assortment of both hollow body and solid body electrics.
If I remember right, I think Brian Jones (the original lead guitarist
of the Rolling Stones) used a VOX Phantom which was a abstract teardrop
shape.
Of course, if you want to see some more VOX amps, tune into the ABC
Beatles special tonight and tomorrow. The first night they ran the
mini-series was when the Beatles were using (in order) AC15's, AC30's,
then AC50's/AC100's and possibly a T.60 bass amp. The later episodes
will have VOX defiants and 7120's but there may still be AC30's
scattered in there since they were considered among the better sounding
of all VOX amps (hence the re-issues!).
|
1033.125 | from Harmony-Central on the WWW | DABEAN::REAUME | vintage racker | Mon Mar 25 1996 10:40 | 12 |
|
NEWS from NAMM show-
VOX has introduced the AC15-TBR. It is a all-tube single 12 combo
w/reverb. It actually utilizes a tube rectifier and as the name
implies, puts out 15 watts. It supposedly uses the top boost preamp
from the AC-30 and also incorporates a master volume. Pretty
interesting amp for those who want something like the AC30 but small
and lighter.
GTS this year? We'll see!
|
1033.126 | more info | SSDEVO::LAMBERT | Are we not SSMEN? We are SSDEVO! | Mon Mar 25 1996 10:49 | 6 |
| Did they list a price? Do you have a pointer to the page?
Thanks,
-- Sam
|
1033.127 | | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Wed Mar 27 1996 06:06 | 2 |
| Yeah!! How much?????
|
1033.128 | | FREEBE::REAUME | vintage racker | Wed Mar 27 1996 10:20 | 7 |
|
The new AC15-TBR is also featured in the new amps section of the
latest GUITAR SHOP magazine. They have some more info. Apparently it is
available in either a 2 X 10 or a 1 X 12 speaker configuration and the
VOX blue speakers are an option. List price is from $999 to $1199 (the
$1199 must be the blue speaker).
Looks a lot like the "son of AC30-TB".
|
1033.129 | | AIAG::WISNER | any thought can be the beginning... | Wed Mar 27 1996 11:51 | 5 |
| > List price is from $999 to $1199 (the
> $1199 must be the blue speaker).
For a 15 Watt amp?
|
1033.130 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | The call me Dr. Love | Wed Mar 27 1996 12:00 | 3 |
|
Maybe they go to "11".
|
1033.131 | Matchless price | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Wed Mar 27 1996 13:36 | 5 |
| BTW, Matchless (the company that made it's name cloning the
VOX AC30-TB) has several models of 15 watt amps which sell
for close to $2000. Makes the Vox AC13 look like a bargain.
Mark
|