T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
947.1 | Shadow Doesn't Give A True Acoustic Sound | AQUA::ROST | Canned ham, that's for me | Tue Oct 25 1988 09:22 | 12 |
|
I have the Shadow model without the controls. It sounds like an
electric guitar to me. As you noticed, the spring clamp tends to
mar the finish when you put it in.
If what you want is an acoustic sound, I'd try somehting else.
I originally got mine because I *wanted* an electric sound and didn't
have the cash for an electric guitar. Now that I own an electric
I never use it anymore. Want to buy it?? 8^) 8^) 8^) 8^)
|
947.2 | lead sound | COGMK::RUDNICK | | Tue Oct 25 1988 09:27 | 5 |
|
I'd have to agree. It does have a great electric lead sound.
B.
|
947.3 | options | ANT::JACQUES | | Tue Oct 25 1988 10:12 | 44 |
|
Most soundhole pickups are humbucking to reduce hum and feedback,
however, the concensus is they don't sound like an acoustic.
No humbucking or single coil magnetic soundhole pickup will produce
the sound of an acoustic naturally. As was mentioned, they block
the soundhole, and muffle the acoustic sound of the guitar.
In order to get a natural acoustic sound, you would have to use
either a Piezo-electric transducer, or tape transducer. Most single
element piezo-electric transducers do not pick up all 6 strings
equally. One or more strings generally gets muffled. Piezo-electics
generally do not produce a very hot signal either, so they usually
need some boost to come through an amp/pa loud enough. The Martin
thinline tape transducers are becoming quite popular. They produce
a nice natural sound, and (if properly installed) pick up all 6
strings equally. Martin is offering these as options on all Sigma
acoustics. Of course the best in the business was designed by
Ovations. Their pickup features a separate piezo-electric element
for each string, coupled to an active preamp which assures that each
string comes through equally loud and clear. Few people know this,
but you can purchase the Ovations OP24 pickups/preamps and have them
installed in any guitar, however, the price is quite high (about $350
incuding installation). Since Kaman (the parent company for Ovations)
purchased the Takamine company, they have been using a similar pickup
in the Taks. The only other company that has anything close is Alvarez
Yairi. They recently introduced the Biphonic pickup system, which
features a separate element for each string, however, they do not
include any active preamp, and this pickup is only available in
the higher priced guitars.
I have heard mention of a Baggs pickup system, which supposedly
is similar to the Ovations and Tamamine pickups. I have no details
to offer on this system, but a few of the major manufacturers
of high priced instruments (Santa Cruz, Alvarez Yairi) are offering
them as options.
Bottom line, I guess, is if you are after a natural acoustic
sound, and have a limited budget, the Martin thinline is the
best bet, but I recommend you have it professionally installed.
The cost including installation is about $125 to $150.
Good luck,
Mark
|
947.4 | I thought..... | JANUS::EVANS | dotted frets play louder...Fact | Tue Oct 25 1988 12:28 | 8 |
| re last
I was always under the impression that the Takamine electronics
were adopted by Ovation rather than t'other way around, mind you
I didn't realise Takamine had been taken over so I could be wrong.
Cheers
Pete.
|
947.5 | Ovations was first by a mile | ANT::JACQUES | | Tue Oct 25 1988 14:00 | 15 |
|
The Ovations pickup was first introduced in the early '70's,
long before Takamine even offered an acoustic/electric. At that
time, people were still attaching DiArmond pickups to their
acoustics to amplify them. Barcus Berry was just beginning to
introduce their piezo-electric pickups at that time. The BBE
pickups REQUIRED a preamp. The preamp that they sold at the
time had a lot of undesireable problems associated with it.
Compared to the BBE pickup and the age-old DiArmond, the Ovations
pickup system was a god-send.
Mark
|
947.6 | The One I Saw Looked Good | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Tue Oct 25 1988 16:10 | 6 |
| I seen a pickup over at McDuffs that went under the bridge. I don't
know if you were talking about this one Mark ? It cost $57.00. It
was small and the guy said it picked up each string individually.
I might head over there this week, I'll check it out again.
Jim
|
947.7 | I'm sceptical !! | ANT::JACQUES | | Wed Oct 26 1988 08:09 | 18 |
| I'm not sure what pickup your referring to. For that price it is
probably a Barcus Berry "Insider" or equivelent. I doubt if it
really has a separate piezo crystal for each string at that price.
What he might have meant is it picks up each string equally. I
am sceptical !!! They would have to make a believer out of me.
A couple of years ago I bought an Insider pickup from them which
they promised I would be happy with... I'm not. Right now I am still
undecided what to do next, but I am considering getting a Martin
Thinline installed unless I can find some information on the Baggs
system.
I have a gig coming up next month for which I need to amplify my
acoustic through a PA. I am hoping to get something installed in
time for this gig. I guess I better get off my duff and start
making some definate plans.
Mark
|
947.8 | I guess Ovation Is On Top Right Now. | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Wed Oct 26 1988 09:46 | 5 |
| Well, I've heard the Ovation with the pickup. It sounded great,
however I could never get used to the round back on it, and the
neck action doesn't suit me.
Jim
|
947.9 | Markley/Martin | COGMK::RUDNICK | | Wed Oct 26 1988 11:44 | 28 |
|
Hey again... thanks for all the comments etc...
I decided I really disliked the Shadow pickup. The more I played
with it the more I didn't like it. I couldn't get an ACOUSTIC
sound I liked. Also the fact that it marred the finish on my guitar,
no matter how slight, really bugged me.
So... I'm going to play with the Dean Markley pickup and see whether
I like that or not. The one I have here (in my hot little hands)
has a fluorcent orange sticker on it that says "NEW MODEL, ZERO HUM -
co-planer, co-axial - DUAL COIL - patent #4,372,186". Well.. I'm
not quite sure what all those axioms mean but I'm going to go home
and see what it sounds like.
HOWEVER... I'm getting skeptical in my old age. Mark (re: 947.7)
could you keep me/us up to date on what you find out about the Martin
thinline tape transducer pickups. I'm sortof in the same situation
you are and am definately not panicing. Nope, I'm not panicing...
definately not.. no way.. uh-uh.. Of interest to me would be where
you find a music store that has the Martin pickups, price, what
is involved in installation, and other juicy tidbits of info.
I get the feeling that a hole would have to be drilled in the guitar
during installation. I'm I right on this? Does that make you as
uncomfortable as it makes me???
Ben.
|
947.10 | acousticity | ANT::JACQUES | | Wed Oct 26 1988 11:55 | 23 |
|
A lot of stores carry the Martin Thinline. In the Worcester area
I would suggest Union Music because they have the best full-time
guitar technician. As I mentioned in an earlier reply, A thinline
including installation will run about $125 to $150. If you would
like to get an idea how they sound, check out a Martin Sigma guitar
with one factory installed.
Yes, a small hole needs to be drilled below the bridge in the slot.
We are talking about a hole approx 1/32" in diameter, large aneough
for a thin wire to be snaked through to the end pin jack. I personlly
have no reservations about doing it to my guitar, but I just want
to make sure that this is the best option available before I do
it. I have already purchased two pickups for this guitar, and am
not satisfied with either. I have a Dimarzio soundhole pickup
and a Barcus Berry insider. I have heard of people using a combination
of both a soundhole and contact pickup and have supposedly gotten
good results, but again, I am sceptical, and who needs two cables,
two mixer channels, etc.
Mark Jacques
|
947.11 | electro-acousticity | COGMK::RUDNICK | | Wed Oct 26 1988 12:01 | 4 |
|
Right. I think I'll go check out a Martin then...
Ben.
|
947.12 | Keep trying. You can get the sound the way you want. | SNFFLS::MADDUX | Hedonist for hire - no job too easy | Wed Oct 26 1988 12:03 | 16 |
|
<< and a Barcus Berry insider. I have heard of people using a combination
<< of both a soundhole and contact pickup and have supposedly gotten
<< good results, but again, I am sceptical, and who needs two cables,
<< two mixer channels, etc.
Pat Flynn does something similar to this, with a specially made
patch cable to plug into a stereo mixer. He's running the Barcus Berry
332. I've got a warm woody sound (finally) after much experimentation.
Using a Shadow inside, with a pre-amp and equalization on the PA I can
get a nice balance. The best acoustic sound is still a good microphone,
and a combination of mike and pickup can work.
I spent about 80 bucks on the pickup, another 120 on the pre-amp,
and run it into a Peavy XR600B.
[Mike_M]
|
947.13 | JAmes Taylor | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Wed Oct 26 1988 13:19 | 6 |
| James Taylor was playing a Yamaha on PBS this past September. It
was half the thickness of a regualr acustic, and there was no hole,
only the assimilation of one, in other words it was black, but
there was no hole. From the TV it sounded great.
Jim
|
947.14 | | ZYDECO::MCABEE | Time to change my personal name | Wed Oct 26 1988 16:02 | 8 |
| Anybody tried a mini-mike? It *looks* like a good idea. No pickup
sounds as real as a good mike, but sometimes you just can't get
enough volume without feedback. I've also tried a combination of
mike and pickup. I think could be a good compromise, but I could
never get the soundperson to understand how to mix it, so I gave
up. I usually just use a PL76 condenser mike.
|
947.15 | Barcus Berry 1332 | ANT::JACQUES | | Thu Oct 27 1988 21:36 | 23 |
| I just checked out a Barcus Berry pickup at Wurlitzers. I think
it is called a 1332. It looks like a thin steel rail with a mini
caox cable attached to the center. They claim that it is the same
model sold under the Martin thinline name. They also claim that
Guild is using them in their latest models. I tried one and it
sounds great. They will install it with the endpin jack for about
$85. Sound's like a good deal. They also said that barcus berry
makes a preamp that you instrl inside the guitar which brings out
the acoustic sound and drives the level of the output higher. The
preamp has no volume or eq controls. It is preset. At least it
doesn't require any holes to be drilled into the guitar. I am
considering having them install both the pickup and preamp on my
Guild.
Anyone have any experience with this type of setup. What do you
think ??
Mark
|
947.16 | S-D makes on too | SUDAMA::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Fri Oct 28 1988 10:14 | 14 |
| You might want to check out the Seymour-Duncan acoustic pickup.
It is a soundhole pickup, looks like a lipstick tube with a small
volume pot on the end. It slips in and out fairly easily, and has some
rubber padding to prevent marring the finish. It was supposedly
specially designed to work well with the output of acoustic strings
with a wound G. I have one that I have used on my Martin with varying
success. If it's connected to an amp that can produce a nice clean
sound and that has good tone controls I can get a very satisfying
acoustic sound out of it. I paid about $65 for it. It is at least one
alternative to making a permanent installation. Also, it is fairly
compact, and I never felt that it affected the acoustic sound that much
if I left it in. But then again I'm not that much of a purist.
- Ram
|
947.17 | ���more??? | COGMK::RUDNICK | | Fri Oct 28 1988 13:26 | 29 |
|
The choices are becomming staggering.
I saw the Martin Thinline at Daddy's in S. Nashua yesterday. Looks
very unimposing, incredibly small and light. I'm still up in the
air as far as drilling a hole in my guitar goes. I realize it's
no big deal. Daddy's is not a Martin dealer so there were no Martin
Sigma's hanging around to try. They did have a used and very abused
Takamine Acoustic with builtin pickups, and EQ. Daddy's wanted
$300.00 for it even though the poor thing was trashed.
Currently I'm still playing with the Dean Markley. I like the sound
it has. Very warm and acoustic. I think I may use it for the current
situation.
One thing I noticed with the Dean Markley and the Shadow as well
which I wonder about is... Does having the pickup in the soundhole
effect the sound the guitar puts out or the perception of how we
hear it? I notice I'm constantly feeling that the guitar
is out of tune where I didn't have constant tuning problems
before. Not being an incredible vocalist I often rely on the guitar
to help me find the correct notes to sing. With the pickup in the
soundhole, wired and running thru my guitar amp I've been having
a harder time picking up those needed notes yet when I check the
tuning the guitar is in. Have I passed into hallucinatory territory?
Ben.
|
947.18 | PLAY AT HOME OR OUT??? | CASV02::GOSS | A working class HERO is something to be | Fri Oct 28 1988 16:20 | 13 |
|
I've played this game before many time, heres what I finally concluded.
If ya want to play acoustic at home buy a nice guild gibson or
whatever.If ya want to play out live with acoustic sound buy an
ovation or something comparable!! You simply cannot get a better
sound than a top line ovation!!! I love guild but I play all ovation
now.
Don't get me wrong you can get a decent sound with a add on
pickup but they DONT compare to a guitar which comes equiped.
Brian
|
947.19 | ? | GOOROO::CLARK | Just say NO to Sterling Downs! | Tue May 22 1990 11:16 | 10 |
| well, this is as good a place to ask as any ...
I had a Barcus-Berry insider pickup installed in my acoustic.
It sounds great plugged into a guitar amp. It sounds TERRIBLE
plugged into a PA - all high-end and no bottom. Also, I can't
seem to get enough volume through the PA. Can anybody tell me
why this is happening? If I run it through a 'cannon' adapter
into a mic input will that solve my problem?
thanks for the advice - Dave
|
947.20 | mismatch!!! | HAMER::KRON | I'm the Amoral Minority! | Tue May 22 1990 14:55 | 8 |
| seems to me that you have an impedance mismatch....a preamp
(9 volt powered between the guitar and the board should help but
make sure that the impedance is high- like 1 meg ohm and the output
impedance should be lower .....I believe it's been discussed here
b4
-Bill
|
947.21 | what about an electric sound? | CSC32::J_KUHN | He who dares, wins | Thu Aug 29 1991 14:58 | 18 |
| Well, on the other extreme, I'm looking for an sound hole for my
ovation acoustic (i have the worlds only ovation with no pickup)
that SOUNDS ELECTRIC (cause for what little recording i do, i cant
justify a electric guitar), and something that wont wreck the sound
hole. I tried the Dean Markley pickup and it was too hard to get in.
Anyone think I may have the problem with the Dimarzio?
An earlier note talked about the Semour Duncan looking like a long
lipstick tube...is it hard to get it to fit?
How bout the De-armond (?) something like that.
The Bill Lawrence?
Any Ideas welcome. I am looking at mail order catalogs that dont show
pictures, and my local store(s) don't really stock anything.
Regards
Jay
|
947.22 | Slide in pick-ups. Bhah! | COMPLX::BULLARD | | Thu Aug 29 1991 15:30 | 11 |
| I had the same 'electric sound' problem trying different
slide in pick-ups. Finally went with the martin thinline
(under the saddle). Had to get the saddle slot lengthened
and new saddle (longer) to make it work though. I Am real
happy with the sound, but it still sounds electric (but less
than others did) when played through a regular guitar amp.
Sounds really acoustic though ,when monitoring by headphones,
my tape deck while recording. Now to get a PA or something
that retains that acoustic flavor.
chuck
|
947.23 | experience with S-D pickup | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Fri Aug 30 1991 19:00 | 12 |
| I've used the S-D soundhole pickup a lot. I wouldn't say it's a breeze
to install, but it's not a killer either, once you figure it out. You
can do it without removing or loosening the string. You have to slip
the whole thing in through the soundhole, pull up the clip on one end
and secure it, then stretch a finger down and behinde the other end
clip, pull it back, and slide it up and into the soundhole. It took me
awhile to figure out a technique for doing this, but once I got the
hang of it it was fairly easy. On the other hand, I didn't take it out
often, and I guess I wouldn't really want to have to do something like
this all the time.
- Ram
|
947.24 | Buffalo Nickel | HSOMAI::CESAK | Makin tracks..sales and rails | Mon Sep 02 1991 22:29 | 11 |
| I got a Buffalo Nickel Pickup 14 years ago for my Martin and have been
fairly satisfied with the sound ever since. This has a transducer
approx. the size of a Nickel and about 1/2 inch thick.It is attached to
the guitar with sticky poster stuff.....the quality of the sound
depends on where you attach the pickup. The drawback....not all sticky
is the same and it's tough when the pick-up falls off the guitar just
as you start the lead to Amy in a crowded bar. Oh well...
This is a very expensive way to start a coin collection although I
think mine cost approx $125.00 way back when....the mind is the second
thing to go.
|
947.25 | I like my thinline with a Fishman pre-amp | COGITO::SULLIVAN | Singing for our lives | Tue Sep 03 1991 10:47 | 2 |
|
You put sticky stuff on your Martin?!!! Gasp!
|
947.26 | DeArmond | GLDOA::REITER | | Tue Sep 03 1991 13:38 | 10 |
| I have a DeArmond 260. It's so easy to pop in and out that I'll pop it
in just to use the line input on the guitar tuner (rather than the mike
input), and then pop it right out to play acoustically.
It also has a nice warm sound that I even prefer over the factory-
installed 332 on my Martin Shenandoah (but with enough gain it will
sound "electric").
Try one out.
\Gary
|
947.27 | DeARmond in the running. | CSC32::J_KUHN | He who dares, wins | Tue Sep 03 1991 15:01 | 9 |
| Thanks for the replies so far.
re: last
I've seen pictures of the DeArmond 260, but I've never seen it mail
order. How much are one of those? I know in the back of Guitar Player
they run a small Ad. I think its between the Bill Lawrence pickup or
that one. As usual, i'm not in a hurry. :-)
Thank you.
|
947.28 | go 4 it | GLDOA::REITER | | Tue Sep 03 1991 15:44 | 7 |
| I think I paid around $60 for my DeArmond 260 a year ago.
I bought it over the counter at Elderly Music in Lansing MI but I have
to believe they have it in their mail order section.
Call 517-372-7890.
\Gary
|
947.29 | Great minds think alike | CSC32::J_KUHN | He who dares, wins | Wed Sep 04 1991 13:42 | 4 |
| re: last
You are one step ahead of me! I Just sent for the Elderly Catalog.
I didnt know the DeArmond was in there though. Appreciate It.
Jay
|
947.30 | Lane Poor Acoustic Pickup | MYMUSE::MASHIA | Every lil' thing gonna be all right | Fri Apr 22 1994 09:53 | 17 |
| I ran across a 'new' acoustic pickup the other day. It's a wooden sound
hole pickup (similar to the Dean Markley), made by a company called
Lane Poor. Had a neat, but slightly complicated sliding bar scheme to
accomodate different soundhole sizes. Also had a somewhat strange
shape (not rectangur) to accomodate some sort of staggered pole
arrangement. I played it thru a PA using a cheap somethingortheother
guitar, and it sounded great. A very natural acoustic sound, much
better than the 'naked' sound of the guitar.
I've been half looking for a pickup for my Taylor 510 for home
recording (too many kids/animals for recording an acoustic with mikes),
but didn't want to hassle with a bridge pickup/preamp, and never cared
for the tone of the soundhole pickups I'd tried, but I probably will
get one of these. Price was $99.
Rodney
|