T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
900.1 | A Theory | ROLL::BEFUMO | An Empty Teacup | Mon Oct 10 1988 08:28 | 6 |
| I'll had a chance to look at a 2 X 15 cabinet since entering the
previous note, and it was wired in series, yielding 16-Ohm impedance.
My assumption would be that the two speaker outputs on the amp are
probably wired in parallel, 'seeing' 16 ohms when a single cabinet
is used and 8 ohms when an extension is connected. Is this correct?
|
900.3 | A question on Fender Heads | NCVAX1::DICKS | Roll Over John Akers & Tell Tom Watson the News | Tue Oct 11 1988 19:37 | 6 |
| I have a Old 50 Watt Fender Bassman Head with the "ext spkr" jack.
I am running it into two Marshall 15"s in seperate enclosures.
ie. Two cables from the head to the speakers.
Am I still driving 50 watts or something less?
|
900.4 | Bassman Speaker Jacks Are In Parallel | AQUA::ROST | Canned ham, that's for me | Mon Oct 17 1988 23:21 | 12 |
|
Re: .2
I have an ancient Bassman head as well as the schematic for the
early 70s "master volume" 50 watt head. In both cases, the two
speaker jacks are in parallel, not series.
Interestingly enough, the main speaker jack is a switching jack.
If you don't plug into it, the output transformer is shorted (I
guess the amp tolerates shorts better than opens???) so if you plug
into *only* the ext spkr jack, you get no sound!!!! (plus possibly
a smoked amp!!)
|
900.5 | Survey Says.....!! | LEDS::ORSI | You live around here often? | Tue Oct 18 1988 09:22 | 12 |
| In a previous reply, I said that the "ext spkr" output
on Fender heads was a series connection. Forget it. I went
home last night and checked all the Fender schematics I
have, Twin, Super Reverb, Quad Reverb, Bandmaster, Dual
Showman, and the VibroSonic, and all have parallel ext spkr
outputs as stated in .4 . I don't have any schematics for
bass heads, but have a schematic for any Fender amp with a
master volume.
Neal
|
900.6 | Kinda figured that | ROLL::BEFUMO | I chase the winds of a prism ship | Wed Oct 19 1988 15:24 | 8 |
| Yea, I kinda figured, 'cause if they were in series it seems to me
you'd have to be using both or nothing. That suggests to me that
perhaps he individual cabinets might have been wired for 16-ohms,
which sort of makes sense, assuming that the amp will deliver more
power into an 8-ohm load, and that you'd want that extra power to
drive the extra speakers.
joe
|
900.7 | Tube amps versus Transistor amps | TYFYS::MOLLER | Holloween the 13th on Elm Street #7 | Wed Oct 19 1988 15:43 | 11 |
| A notes few back....
An amplifier that uses an output transformer (versus direct coupled),
needs to be loaded, hence a shorting jack on the output of the
amplifier head. Leaving it open can cause your transformer to fail
(and they are usually quite expensive to replace these days).
For those of you with direct coupled amplifiers, you want to avoid
shorting the output stage, as smoke, fire and brimstone may be the result.
Jens
|
900.8 | Dual Amps one Speaker???? | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Mon Jan 14 1991 11:39 | 15 |
|
I'd like to get rid of my Laney 2-12 cab if this will work. Would
one of our technical dudes, help me with this? I'd like to use my
Concert head to drive the speaker in the cab of my deluxe and select
one amp or the other using an A/B.. but I'm worried about how one amp
sees the load of the other amp... It would look like this... Am I
crazy, I'm not going to do anything until I hear... heh heh
+------------------+---------------+
Mr Concert Mr Deluxe Mr. Speaker
(-)----------------(-)-------------(-)
Mr. Electronics!!!! Greeeeeeee Veeeeeee King!!!!! (make him happy
ladies and gentlemen.....)
|
900.9 | It can be done.....but why? | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Mon Jan 14 1991 12:33 | 10 |
| Steve,
The only way you can use both amp heads is to build or buy a
switching system which will A/B between amps,and put a speaker load
on whichever amp your not using at the same time along with redirecting
the speaker leads to the amp your using. Perhaps finding a 1 12 cab
for the Concert head would be easier/cheaper and just accept the tonnage
for the price you pay for your sound.
|
900.10 | Tube amps hate open loads
| LEDS::BURATI | | Mon Jan 14 1991 13:06 | 7 |
| If you do this switching thing, bear in mind that tube amps don't
enjoy open loads very much. If you ever noticed that the output jacks
provide a DEAD SHORT when nothings connected to them. If you run the
output to a switching device, that device will need to provide that
short in place of a valid load.
--rjb
|
900.11 | I think a dead short is trouble | MEMCL1::KELLYJ | Tone droid | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:32 | 9 |
| Re -.1: Is this really true? I don't see how having a shorted output
jack is electrically different than laying a hunk a wire across the
terminals for the speaker leads...a dead short, in other words. But,
all of my amps warn against loads lower than 8, or 4, or 2 ohms, depending
on the amp. Now you're proposing that I put a load of 0.000...0001 ohms
(a short) across the amplifier outputs. Could you elaborate?
Regards,
John
|
900.12 | | SMURF::LAMBERT | Fender Bender | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:43 | 7 |
| re: .11
I think he's saying a dead short is better than no load whatsoever.
I'm not sure I buy this, as either one would have a good chance of
toasting your output transformer. Can anyone shed light on this?
-- Sam
|
900.13 | Fender fried...... | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:46 | 37 |
| re.-1 Yep....
re-.2
well,Ron I disagree,running a tube amp with no load or a short will
fry his output x-former and/or shorten tube life. The transformer is suppose to
be seeing 4 to 8 ohms. You prefer to dissipate heat through a 4-8 ohm load as
opposed to the x-former. So you really want a load on the xformer when it is
disconnected from the speaker and the other amp is being used.
Here's my scenario:
Switch Position #1
Amp A:
Input--------- Speaker/sound
Amp B:
No Input------ Load/no sound
__________________________________________
Switch Position #2
Amp A:
No Input------ Load/no sound
Amp B:
Input--------- Speaker/sound
Buy a 1 12 cab for the Concert....and an A/B switch,it's easier... :^)
your Deluxe will feel better!
|
900.14 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Mon Jan 14 1991 17:07 | 18 |
| RE: <<< Note 900.13 by ROYALT::BUSENBARK >>>
-< Fender fried...... >-
Oh, ayuh, I'd like to say that I already knew this stuff, and was
jest checking in, but I can't, <sob> I'm a dummy when it comes to
electronics. Thanks much.. I get it now. No matter what I do, unless
I build a bunch of switches that would include a dummy load for one of
the amps.. I'd be pushing a signal into the transformer of one or the
other amps at infinite load.. and... hey, do I smell smoke???
Thanks again.. I ordered this cool EV 12 inch guitar speaker.. I like
it tight... and if it sounds OK in my new deluxe, I'll probably take
the Fender speaker out and build a little 1-12 for the concert as you
suggest.. makes sense... Greee Veee King... saved from disaster once
again by guitar notin' dudes!!
|
900.15 | I concure. I think. | LEDS::BURATI | | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:56 | 17 |
| Manufacturers put the shorting jack on the output probably
because they assume no one will drive the amp's input without
a speaker connected. The scenerio is that the amp gets set up
and turned on without the speaker connected well before the
musician is ready to play. So there is typically no signal
present before the mistake is discovered. The output stage is
in a quiescent state. The xformer is not dissipating any power.
I'm trying to think of why the amp makers short the output xformer
secondary rather than just leave it open. I'm sure they didn't put
a more expensive jack in the unit just for laffs. If you assume that
they know what they're doing, then obviously (in a
vacume tube amp) a dead short is preferrable to an open load or
Fender et al wouldn't have built their units this way for the last
30 or 40 years. If you are actually driving the amp, though...
Hey Jay! Got any comments on this???
|
900.16 | OK, How bout this??? | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:18 | 17 |
|
OK, how about another stoopid question??? I've got this great cab
filled with two celestion speakers (70 watters) and it's 8 ohms...
I'm going strictly single 12 with my sound soooo... I'm sellin my
beloved celestion cab... But wait... if the cab is 8 ohms, that means
they've hooked two 16 ohm speakers in parralel or 2 4 ohm speaker in
series what keeps me from hooking a little 8 ohm resisitor across the
leads of a 16 ohm speaker to make it an 8 ohm speaker... or from
hooking a teeny weeny 4 ohm (is there such a thing?) to one of the
leads of a 4 ohm speaker to make it 8 ohms... Don't make fun of me,
I've got a fragile ego... would this stuff work??
Gree Vee
|
900.17 | notgunnndooit | LEDS::BURATI | | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:28 | 4 |
| No. And that's all I'm gonna say. I've gotten into
too much trouble in this note already.
--rjb
|
900.18 | | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:38 | 3 |
| ah come on Ron it's all in fun!!!!!,hey steve! Ron's right,and thats
all I'm gonna say too.... :^) The answer is no.....
|
900.19 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Wed Jan 16 1991 10:01 | 7 |
|
Heh heh, thanks, dudes... Ron.. helpful advice dude.. I'll be
saying thank-yew...
Steve
|
900.20 | You can...but... | TRUCKS::LITTEN | | Thu Jan 17 1991 07:21 | 28 |
| Steve,
I have not been following this note....but from what I understand you
have asked re: about 3 notes back......
You want to rip out (or bypass electrically) one of you speakers in the two
speaker cab??
Yes you can do it, but you will lose power in the single speaker.
If it is a four ohm version you need a four ohm resistor in series to make
eight ohms. The four ohm resistor must be capable of disipating the same
wattage as the speaker. Because power is proportional to the square of voltage
or current, you will only get one quarter of the sound power out of the
cabinet.
If the speakers are two sixteen ohms in parallel, you will need to provide a
sixteen ohm resistor across the remaining speaker. Sound and resistor power
comments apply as above.
The reason why you get less sound power is that the amplifier is providing its
signal into the "dummy" resistor and your "lost" sound is being converted into
heat.
Hope this helps and that I have not jumped in with mouth blazing and missing
the point !
Dave
|
900.21 | shorts and opens | OTOA01::ELLACOTT | non_teenage_mutant_ninja_bassist | Fri Jan 18 1991 16:11 | 14 |
| There is a good reason for shorting the output jack when there's no
speaker connected. The transformer is an impedence matching device. The
output impedence is relatively low (2-16 ohms). Ask yourself what is
closer to that load, a dead short (0 ohms) or an open (infinite ohms).
Another thing about transformers is that they reflect the impedence of
the output on the input. This means the AC design of the amp is
affected with sometimes catastrophic results. Jay can probably explain
this better.
THIS IS NOT TRUE WITH SOLID STATE AMPS!!!!!!
If you short the outputs of one of these she's a goner.
FJE
|
900.22 | | FSTVAX::GALLO | Spontaneous Harmony Singing | Mon Jan 21 1991 07:41 | 12 |
|
This brings up another question:
In transistor amps it's OK to put a higher load that the
amp is rated at, with a related drop in output power.
What are the rules for tube amps? Can I put more load
than it wants? Less load?
-T
|
900.23 | | MEMORY::RATTEY | | Tue Aug 13 1991 10:44 | 15 |
|
....I've got this old super reverb...the 4-10's are wired for
2-ohms....and the amp has an extermal speaker jack as well....
...the back panel doesn't specify maximum load.....
...now what do think would happen to the output transformer
if I plug in another 8-ohm on top of the 2 ??
...what if I rewire the 4-10's to 8-ohms...
...will I take a chance of blowing something if run this thing at
8-ohms ???
Ray.
|
900.24 | | ROYALT::TASSINARI | Bob | Tue Aug 13 1991 11:30 | 6 |
|
I've heard 'never less than 4 ohms' for what that's worth. If you rewire to
8 ohms your power goes down.
- Bob
|
900.25 | if it ain't broke... | LEDS::BURATI | Fender Bender | Tue Aug 13 1991 16:48 | 8 |
| I'd leave your 4 10s wired the way the factory wired them. A super
has a 2 ohm secondary. If you change the load, you'll never have
an optimum load without your exention spkr (assuming you've
created a combination that will give you a 2 ohm load). Admittedly,
a 2 ohm speaker output doesn't give you much leaway for adding more
speakers. It's really your call, but I would leave a super just
the way the factory built it. After all, it was one of the most
successful amps Fender ever made.
|
900.26 | | MEMORY::RATTEY | | Tue Aug 13 1991 16:59 | 11 |
|
OK...I just called the factory...here's what they had to say..
....The output transformer wants to see a 2-ohm load...
if one chooses to change speaker configuration it is recomended
that the output transformer be changed to match the load...
keep in mind that going to a different output transformer will
effect the tonal qualities of the amp......
.R.
|