T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
772.1 | Just a few comments | VOLKS::RYEN | Rick Ryen 285-6248 | Tue Aug 16 1988 12:26 | 41 |
| I just picked up a MKIII, with reverb, EQ, 60 watts, and
the A/B tube switch, cover and lead and rhythm switches.
Price included a 1.5 year warranty with loaner.
I paid 1399, but was told that there
has been a recent price increase to 1499 for that model.
The 100 watt unit was about $200 more, but they didn't have any in
stock so I went for the 60.
I haven't looked in the want advertiser, but expect that you could
pick up a used one much cheaper. I bought mine on an impulse after
getting back a fat IRS return.
I believe that the big advantage of the MKIII is the footswitching
capability. You can go from clean to real screaming dirty of fat rhythm
and have the volume well balanced between each setting. The reverb is
real nice, but you could probably get by without the EQ.
As far as maintenance, I expect to change the power tubes every
1 to two years, but that will vary depending upon how much and how
hard you use it. I'll probably go two years. I'd guess that its
somewhere in the neighborhood of $60 for a new tube set.
I drive a marshall 4x12 slant cab with it off the speaker jacks quite nicely.
I changed the cab wiring to make it 8ohms. I leave the 12" boogie speaker
connected when I am playing leads with lots of high stuff or clean,
and disconnect it when I get real loud with more midrange and base,
just so I don't loosen it up. I've also tried the Boogie direct out into
various fender amps between 50 and 100 watts driving 2/12 or 4/12 speakers.
You can get more volume and most of the Boogie EQ, but the sound looses a
bit of Boogie crispness.
I've experimented a bit with effects between the boogie and a slave amp,
which seems to work reasonable well. Its best with stereo effects
but with a bit more noise than with the Boogie alone.
I've almost abandoned use of all of my effects, since I seem to get everything
I want from Mesa.
I've miked it with sure SM58 into a 1500 watt PA with reasonable success,
but it looses some low end (probably because of the SM58).
|
772.2 | $60 every 2 years is conservative guess | ANT::JACQUES | | Wed Aug 17 1988 15:48 | 16 |
| I hate to tell you, but I think a set of tubes will cost you
more than $60 for a full set. A pair of 6L6GC's will run you
$40. The preamp tubes are about $12/each. I think you are talking
closer to $100. My Twin Reverb cost $175 for a full set of Groove
tubes. Boogie tubes are about the same price give or take a couple
bucks. Also, depending on how much you use the amp and how loud
you play, I believe you may need to replace tubes every 6-12 months.
Amps with high-gain preamps tend to eat tubes much faster than
clean sounding amps.
I don't mean to nitpick but be prepared to pay a high price, and
change tubes frequently.
Mark
|
772.3 | My guess was wishfull thinking | VOLKS::RYEN | Rick Ryen 285-6248 | Thu Aug 18 1988 13:03 | 17 |
| re: -1;
We'll it was only a guess, and probably wishfull thinking on
my part. Since I haven't actually purchaced any in recent years,
I accept you estimate as the more realistic one. My head is a
bit behind the times, since I can still remember walking into
Radio Shack and picking up tube replacements for a few bucks
a piece.
Even dropping a couple hundred every year or so doesn't seem too
bad when you consider how much the boogie costs in the first place
and how fine it sounds.
Thanks for the correction.
Rick
|
772.4 | cost too much for me though | UPWARD::HEISER | Colonel MIDI Rack Puke (tm) | Wed Feb 06 1991 16:02 | 4 |
| I thought J-dot's Les Paul sounded great thru his Boogie half stack on
Sunday.
Mike
|
772.5 | Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww | CAVLRY::BUCK | Set coasters/no_brakes! | Wed Feb 06 1991 16:08 | 1 |
|
|
772.6 | "A REAL SMOKER!!" | SALEM::STIG | | Mon Aug 17 1992 11:07 | 5 |
| I have a Mark III.It sounds great thru a 4x12 boogie cab.Real
compatible.It smokes...There's no way to tame it#$@@OOUUCHHH!!!The EQ's
nice.Lots of PPOOWWEERRRR!!Love it!!!!I've had some problems with a 60
HURTS(HaHa) Hum.Nature of the beast deal.The design could of been
better.Other than that...SMOKERRR....
|
772.7 | | CSC32::H_SO | Redline? What redline? | Mon Aug 17 1992 20:47 | 14 |
| RE; -.1
<I've had some problems with a 60 HURTS(HaHa) Hum.
??? Hmmm...8*)... I never had problems with a hum, unless I've got
a bad tube, or something (one's starting to go bad now...8*( ). What
guitar are you playing thru??? Sometimes, the single coils would get
my MKIII all excited and it would hum a little... Maybe the dsp128's
built in noise suppressor helps, too?
???
Jmystr who_found_a_sweet_"singing_tone"_out_of_his_boogie_last_weekend!!!
P.S. Will Collum woulda been proud of me!!!
|
772.8 | If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch! :) | KDX200::COOPER | A regular model of restraint... | Mon Aug 17 1992 23:02 | 9 |
| Noise suppresor in a DSP128 ??
NOT!
There is no noise supressor in a DSP128, but there is a Filter
type EQ.
Hmmm...Better hit the books dood.
:)
|
772.9 | "NATURE OF THE BEAST" | SALEM::STIG | | Tue Aug 18 1992 06:20 | 7 |
| I've tried to get the hum fixed but they tell me that the hum is coming
from the way it was designed.I forget what...Something to do with
transformer being to close to something.I've always had the problem
since I bought it...Until a year ago-the HUM stopped out of the
blue.That started when the weather started getting warmer.Maybe a
temperature thing.I don't know...I don't use much cause I use an ADA
MP1 for live.Anyone else help...
|
772.10 | coupla ideas... | HYDRA::BURGESS | Water dependent | Tue Aug 18 1992 07:05 | 27 |
| re <<< Note 772.9 by SALEM::STIG >>>
> -< "NATURE OF THE BEAST" >-
> I've tried to get the hum fixed but they tell me that the hum is coming
> from the way it was designed.I forget what...Something to do with
> transformer being to close to something.I've always had the problem
Maybe too close to the sheet metal of the chassis or box side ??
Is it any better if you take the cover off (assuming you can) ??
> since I bought it...Until a year ago-the HUM stopped out of the
> blue.That started when the weather started getting warmer.Maybe a
Or a ground loop ?? Maybe some hum cancelling if you plugged
into the wall the opposite way ??
> temperature thing.I don't know...I don't use much cause I use an ADA
> MP1 for live.Anyone else help...
FWIW, etc. Also, if you want to get it fixed (as in
"re-designed") it might be worth describing the problem in the audio
conference, or audio-engineering - seriously, some of those folks are
good at this stuff, someone might offer to take it into their home
workshop.
R
|
772.11 | Back after this important message | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | db | Tue Aug 18 1992 09:49 | 17 |
| re: .7 H_SO
> who_found_a_sweet_"singing_tone"_out_of_his_boogie_last_weekend!!!
Isn't it funny how subjective "tone" is and yet how consist the
experience among Boogie owners is.
The bottom line for Boogies is that you can spend half your life trying
to dial up a great sound on a Boogie, but once you get it, it's more
incredible than anything else you've played.
If you've found "the tone", my advise to you (based on years of dialing
up boogies) is:
" DON'T TOUCH THAT DIAL!"
;-)
|
772.12 | | KDX200::COOPER | A regular model of restraint... | Tue Aug 18 1992 10:30 | 4 |
| And maybe write it down !
Sam may have noticed that his new Marshall has some marks on the face-plate
so I knew where to position the knobs. :)
|
772.13 | "HUMMER,HUMMER,HUMMER" | SALEM::STIG | | Tue Aug 18 1992 11:32 | 3 |
| I can try the plug the other way. Last time I brought it in they did do
something with the shield but the problem came back soon after.Who
knows...
|
772.14 | They're "OK" as far as amps go, but I'd rather have a Dumble! ;^) | LUNER::ABATELLI | Who knew? | Tue Aug 18 1992 11:39 | 20 |
| Beasts they are without a doubt and I have at least 10-20 sheets of
scrap paper to tell me what setting is "the" ultimate Boogie setting
for me, but you know what? If you move from that basement, or that
club, or it rains for 2 days, or if the moon is full you may go to
those "golden" settings, listen to that sound and maybe say YUCK,
what was I drinking too much soda water when I wrote these settings
down? Boogies are nice, but like alot of tube amps they also have
this love/hate relationship with their owners. Myself included! I
got an absolute KILLER tone out on my MK2c head with a Roland GP8 processor
and (believe it or not) an old Fender Bandmaster cabinet loaded with
12" Altecs! So what did I do? Grabbed another sheet of paper and wrote
EVERYTHING down so I could recreate it another time, but I bet the
environmental conditions will be different and screw it up (again).
Then again... maybe not? My band's playing this weekend outside, so
we'll see what happens. Maybe my rig will behave... then again, maybe
I'll bring along my Peavey MX just in case. ;^)
Rock on,
Fred (who thinks Boogie's are a "nice" amp)
|
772.15 | My Boogie doesn't have a digital readout | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | db | Tue Aug 18 1992 13:46 | 7 |
| > And maybe write it down !
Won't help, unless the numbers on your boogie are measured in units
of 1/100 (1.01, 1.02, etc.)
Cause as I've said in other notes, some of the controls are ridiculously
sensitive.
|
772.16 | Too complicated for little ole me | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Just look at what you did here | Tue Aug 18 1992 15:47 | 13 |
| That seems like it would be one of the advantages of the TriAxis
preamp. The numbers are digital with small increments and you can
store your cool sounds.
That over sensitivity is one of the things I never liked about Boogies,
it's too hard for me. I'm too dumb to work something like that, I need
something I can plug into and get *basically* a good sound with the
controls pretty much anywhere. Then I can tweak that a little, rather
then something that has controls that change the basic sound so much
that I have trouble finding the sound I had last week before someone
else played through my amp and moved the knobs.
Greg
|
772.17 | | KDX200::COOPER | A regular model of restraint... | Tue Aug 18 1992 16:30 | 4 |
| Knobs in 1/100th s??
Perhaps a little super glue in the pots then ??
:)
|
772.18 | are they really that bad? | EZ2GET::STEWART | Logic is the beginning of wisdom | Tue Aug 18 1992 19:09 | 12 |
|
negatory on the super glue, Coop...if they're as sensitive as they say,
they won't have any adjustment left for the next change in humidity or
whatever...
Sounds like what they need are some of those Bourn 10 turn pots like
you find on good scientific gear...or maybe a good trade in on a
Kitty-rack. *8')
I don't think I'd have much fun if I had to calibrate the damn amp
every time I felt like playin'...
|
772.19 | Running 125 watts!!! | CSC32::H_SO | Redline? What redline? | Tue Aug 18 1992 20:11 | 58 |
| Errr....OK....I must be crazy. I've not noticed change in the Boogie's
tone unless I make the changes.
Controls...
To me, the Boogie's controls are not sensitive enough. It seems that
the Peavey's controls are sensitive to the point that I can just look
at the tone controls and it changes, whereas the Boogie's controls, I
have to make a large change in order for tone to change drastically.
If I want to make a drastic change, I fiddle w/EQ.
The controls are to me, more a pastel changes. By this, I mean, they're
subtle and must blend w/other changes to make it really noticeable.
But there are lots of different controls, and they consists of pull/shift
features also.
RE; .11
< " DON'T TOUCH THAT DIAL!"
I have not!!! 8*)
RE; .12
<And maybe write it down !
And I certainly have!!!
RE: .14
Fred. Again, I must be an odd-ball... I've had the Boogie for 3 years,
and I've not had any problems getting the "standard tone" I used for that
project. The tone I finally tuned into has been very illusive for me all
these years, tho. And I went back a couple of days later, put it into
a different context, and it sounded sweet as before(even better).
The trick to this whole thing is that I've hook up the Peavey Bravo 112
in stereo to the Boogie, and the two amps are emulating differnt tones,
which by themselves do not sound that impressive, but layered, they sound
extremely cool. This is what I'm running:
|----FXloop------|
Guitar----->Boogie---->DSP128----->Boogie w/4x12
\
Stereo
\ (Low input)
--->Bravo w/1x12
I'm using the Boogie's preamp for distortion and EQ, using dsp for chorus,
delay, reverb, etc, and going into the Bravo's low input, and running the
Bravo dry w/added EQ.
This may sound like it might be a lob-sided, but I'm not playing to bust
any ceilings, and not only that, the Bravo keeps up pretty well. Well enough
to produce a very loud "stage volume" if I wanted to.
Jmystr "extremely physed!!!"
|
772.20 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Like a cat caught in a vacuum | Thu Jan 27 1994 11:42 | 31 |
|
FYI, there's a Mesa/Boogie mailing list that might interest some of
you.
gh
Article 39419 of rec.music.makers:
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar,rec.music.makers.guitar.tablature,rec.music.makers.marketplace,rec.music.makers
Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!crl.dec.com!crl.dec.com!caen!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!eng.ufl.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!liberty!gspice
From: [email protected] (Graham Spice)
Subject: MESA/Boogie interest
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 05:33:17 GMT
Organization: Washington & Lee University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Lines: 10
Xref: nntpd.lkg.dec.com rec.music.makers.marketplace:2985 rec.music.makers:39419
For all to know, the address of the MESA/Boogie users email journal has
changed. To subscribe, send email to [email protected] with no
subject. In the body of the letter, write:
SUB boogie-talk Your Name
Just for kicks, here's an example:
SUB boogie-talk Graham Spice
The name of the journal is Boogie-talk and it is an unregulated journal
with 50+ members who have or are interested in MESA/Boogie products. Feel
free to check it out. Graham
|
772.21 | Mesa Trem-o-Verb vs Peavey's look-a-like Twin | NOKNOK::ABATELLI | | Wed Dec 28 1994 15:11 | 21 |
| Road tested 2 amps this past weekend:
I played a Trem-o-verb combo with 2 Celestions in Rochester, NY over
the weekend. Really REALLY cool sounding amp and VERY easy to dial in
a great tone. The price however was not as easy to handle... $1500 for
the 2x12" combo! and it weighed around 3,000 lbs to boot! The tremolo was
really cool and the best reverb I've ever heard from Mesa... almost
Fenderish! Scary... really scary! Nice leather covering too! ;^)
I also played a new 2 channel Peavey 100 watt (all tube) 2x12" combo
that had Mesa Trem-o-verb look-a-like written all over it! Leatherish
material with a polished chrome faceplate. Also a very nice amp with
lush reverb and cool tremolo. A clean channel with HEADROOM and a very
smooth overdrive channel with tons of controllable feedback using a
"stock" Fender Strat. It was ALOT lighter (in weight) than the Mesa or
a Fender Twin (with Altecs)... but not by much. The price was around
$700.00!
Have a GREAT holiday!
Fred
|
772.22 | sound advice | FREEBE::REAUME | my 2 vices - GTS and coasters | Wed Dec 28 1994 16:41 | 16 |
|
Must've been at the H.O.G. (House of Guitars). I checked out their
new pro-sound building a couple weeks back. Nice! I saw both of the
amps you are referring to. I don't think either one is a bad amp, or
really that bad of a deal (you seemed to be impressed so some extent
with both). You are paying for the Mesa name in that they don't
discount squat. The margins for M/B gear with dealers is not even in
the same ballpark as Peavey, Marshall, or just about any other US
manufacturer (well I heard VHT is just as tight with margins). So
you're not getting the price down too much from list.
The trade-offs here are that the M/B will likely hold its value
better, but then again there's shelling out the big bucks when you
purchase. And if the Trem-O-Verb is your holy grail of amps, then it
is less likely that you will need to trade anytime in the near future.
With very few exceptions you lose money the day you buy a piece of
gear, so be sure it really is what you want!
|