T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
710.1 | If you care enough. | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | I know from just bein' around | Wed Jul 06 1988 08:58 | 31 |
|
I think that the key to getting a character_tone is the minimalist
approach! I've said this before, that most guitar players have no
idea what the controls even do, and simply follow the cliche' of
"everything on 10" - just because "so 'n so" of AC Nugent does it
that way...
In an average setup, you have;
1. Guitar volume
2. Amp pre volume
3. Amp post volume
4. Guitar tone
5. Guitar phase switch position
6. Amp bass
7. Amp mid
8. Amp treble
It would take at least 16 experiments, choosing only two positions
of each of the above factors, to figure out which ones will give
you the sound you want. It would also probably take you all day
to carefully go through the structure sequence of the 16 experiments.
(After which you'd know *what* and *where* to get the sound you
like). Now, tell me, which is easier; to spend a lot of time in
concise qualification of control capabilities - or - to just crank
'em all to 10?
I rest my case...
Joe Jas
|
710.2 | Why I Sound So Bad | AQUA::ROST | Obedience to the law guarantees freedom | Wed Jul 06 1988 09:53 | 47 |
|
I've noticed that I tend to find a tone setting that I like within
about an hour after I get a new instrument or amp and then stick
with it for a long time.
Then I'll get into a situation where I need a different sound so
I'll experiment, come up with new settings and wonder how I ever
got along with the *old* settings!!!!
Sometimes I'm so lazy I won't even check the knobs after setting
up, and if they've been jostled I get some unpleasant surprises....
Anyway my favorites, which I'll use on almost any amp (with some
tweaking):
For guitar:
Bass on 4 or less
Mid on 8-10
Treble on 5-8
Presence (if available) to taste
For bass:
Bass on 8-10, less if room sounds boomy
Mid on 4 or less
Treble on 6-8, more if room sounds dull
Graphic EQ (if available): Boost at 100 Hz, cut at 400-800 Hz
I always set my amp volumes so that my guitar volume control is
only halfway up, so I have plenty of room to adjust if needed (all
my instruments have preamps or compensated controls so there is
no tonal loss when turning the volume down).
On bass amps that have master volume setups, I prefer to crank the
channel gain up pretty high (say 6-8) to get a *little* bit of
distortion to give more "meat" to the sound.
|
710.3 | my $.02 | SUDAMA::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Wed Jul 06 1988 10:05 | 18 |
| I use similar settings to Brian most of the time, with one exception.
I generally adjust the amp so that I get an appropriate max lead
volume with the guitar volumes cranked all the way up. I'd rather
have the headroom to be able to adjust things at the guitar, but
the tone is better when the pickups are wide open.
The relative setting of the bass and treble controls depends a lot
on the amp. My amp has internal eq settings, so a lot depends on
how I have this set up. Also, it will depend on the acoustics of
the room and the placement of the amp. A cabinet sitting on the
floor will have much more bass than one on a stand of some sort.
I have really never understood the mentality of just cranking
everything up to 10. If amps were really designed to be used this
way they could cut a lot of costs by just leaving the controls off
completely.
- Ram
|
710.4 | On a boogie you can get 33 | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Yo! | Wed Jul 06 1988 16:29 | 3 |
| I set all my controls to 11 ;-)
db
|
710.5 | This may not help, but.......... | SALEM::ABATELLI | Set/Mode=No_Think | Wed Jul 06 1988 16:50 | 49 |
|
Well I'll tell ya, what sounds good to me might not sound good to
you, but with a 1969 Fender Strat (stock....well, kinda???)
Clean channel:
Pre gain - 2 (Bright switch - OFF)
Post gain - 8 - 10
Bass - 6
Mid - 8
Treble - 8
Pres - 5
Reverb - 3 - 5 (Varies due to room acoustics)
Lead Channel:
Pre gain - 7 (Bright switch - OFF)
Saturation- 10
Post gain - 2 - 5 (Varies due to actual volume of backline)
Bass - 5
Middle - 6
Treble - 8 (Thick switch - ON)
Pres - 5
Reverb - 0 - 5 (Varies to room acoustics)
If I'm using a Les Paul, I change all the settings.
I use a Peavey VT-MX with a single EVM-12" (4 ohm) speaker.
I also use an old Fender cab. w/2-12" Altecs for bigger rooms.
I've found that speakers make a BIG difference in tone, but
then you all knew that.
You know Bill,
By installing JBL's in a 4-12" Marshall cab and porting
the back of the cabinet, it'll also warm up the sound. You should
have asked the guy what type of speakers he was using. They don't
have to be Celestions ya know. I knew this guy in N.Y.C. that ran
a Marshall 50 watt head through a Marshall 4-12 cab. loaded with
JBL's and an open back. It had a real nice warm tone too. BTW, he
was also using a Strat.
Use all the above information with a grain of salt.
Only you're the best judge of the sound "you" want.
If one person likes everything at "11", then go for it!
If the next guy doesn't, then fine for him too!
I like my sound 80% of the time. It'll crunch and feedback
when I want it to and run super clean when I press the foot
switch. What more can I ask for? It does the job for me and
I'm happy with it!
Fred-who-thinks-EVERYTHING-can-be-improved.......just give me one
more minute!
|
710.6 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | behind blues eyes... | Thu Jul 07 1988 08:57 | 40 |
| I have two amps and I set them this way:
Fender studio lead
Clean channel
Bass 4
mid 8
treble 5
dirty channel
bass 4
mid 8
treble 7
reverb 7-8
Music man RD-112
clean channel
volume 1 full
volume 2 as required (output)
dirty channel
volume 1 8
volume 2 as required (output)
treble 7
mid 4-5
bass 1
reverb 5
I use the volume and tone knobs of the guitar to get fine tuning
on the sounds...I'm very picky on how much treble I use, one 'cuz
it hurts my ears, two because I use a strat and it's a bit trebly..
dbII
|
710.7 | What's *your* secret??? Really??? | SALEM::ABATELLI | Set/Mode=No_Think | Fri Jul 08 1988 09:08 | 14 |
|
What about you Bill?
How do *you* stand on this issue and what settings do you use?
How about Mr. Desrochers? Where do *you* stand on this Tom?
Come on Tom-ato...... what is your favorite tone and how do
"YOU" get that tone out of your amp? You can't just say...
"well...I have a Boogie", because you "could" get some real
disgusting sounds out of your Boogie (_if_you_really_wanted_to_),
that would make babies cry and dogs bark for miles around. ;^)
What's *YOUR* secret?
Anyone else?
|
710.8 | Working with new stuiff though | MARKER::BUCKLEY | Party with Shamu between the bridges! | Fri Jul 08 1988 09:12 | 6 |
|
Well, with the gk, I used to put iot all to 10, except for Pres
which only made it to about 7.
The marshall, well, mid is always up 7-10. bass to room, treble
5-8, pres 2-5, vol's 10
|
710.9 | | HAVOC::DESROCHERS | concentratin' on truckin' right | Fri Jul 08 1988 10:00 | 23 |
|
Volume on 10?? Saturday, I put my boogie up the loudest it's
ever been... master on 6, clean on 5 with distortion pedal.
Painful to say the least!!
Tone has alot to do with the guitar/amp combination. I had an
early 70's ES335 that had no tone. My '62 has a very fat tone.
With the guitar volume on 5 to 7, it's very clean. 8 to 10 made
those PAF's distort nicely. At the SeasonJams, I almost never
used distortion.
Normal settings for me (assuming fairly new strings) would be:
Master volume: 2
Clean volume: 3 to 4
Treble: 6
Midrange: 5
Bass: 10 (always)
Presence: 5
Reverb: 5
_ _
Graphic EQ: - - - (just above flat)
|
710.10 | no one setting will do !! | PLDVAX::JACQUES | | Tue Jul 12 1988 09:49 | 21 |
| From reading the replies here, I noticed that everyone except for
Tom D sets the treble high, bass low on their amp. I tend to side
with Tom on this matter, especially if you are using a guit with
single coils. I used to get complaints from other band members if
I set the treble too high. Also, from reading various interviews
in GP, etc. I found that most of the players with superb tone
(guys like Carlos Santana, Joe Walsh, Jerry Garcia) all advocate
using more bass than treble). However, I have found that the use
of effects (especially chorus) tends to muddy up the sound if the
bass is set too high, and the treble too low. This sort of makes
me wonder if a midi-preamp like the ADA MP1 or similar would be
a good way to go for getting the right tone with differant effects.
What it adds up to is there is no "ONE" setting that will be right
all the time, especially when switching pickups, effects, and guitars
in the course of an evening.
Per usual this is all pure opinion !!!!
Mark Jacques
|
710.11 | Warn tube sound with my guitar | TYFYS::MOLLER | Vegetation: A way of life | Tue Jul 12 1988 15:08 | 20 |
| On my Twin Reverb (With very bright Altec 12" speakers), I like:
Reverb Channel: Volume: 3-4
Bright Switch: On
Treble: 5
Midrange: 10
Bass: 8
Reverb: 3
Master Volume: 3-5
I usuall play on the treble (bridge) pickup & do not have any tone
controls on my guitar (Mity-Mite Humbucking Pickups). This gives
me an even tone. I often use both pickups, or swap to the bass (neck)
pickup to give ma a variation on sounds. Usually the Treble pickup's
volume control (on the guitar) its set to 100% on, and the bass pickup's
volume is set to 90% on. My stomp boxes are used to quickly vary
the sounds of the instrument.
Jens
|
710.12 | QUICK | VIVIAN::BENNETT | Ridin' along in my L.A.V.c | Fri Jul 15 1988 05:31 | 27 |
| Help QUICK !
I am gigging in a local pup tonight and have the opportunity to
use a Marshall stack (100w master vol') for the first(ISH) time.
My problem is that I have only practiced with it for about 3 hours
last night, fairly loud. I can't get a decent sound from the beast
at lower volumes suitable for pub work, mind you it will probably
get louder later in the evening :-)
I need some advice on settings etc before this evening or it's back
to the trusted Yamaha. I really don't want to pass up this chance.
I'll be playing rhythm guitar (quite a bit of cut required) on either
a Strat' or Tele custom.
I'll need to start with master vol' about 3/4 (small pub!) at this
level all the 'tone' seems to be bass and muffled, what am I doing
wrong ?
I also have access to a range of pedals if need be (not normally
used). I often play very 'clean', I would like to maintain this
if poss' and not have to overdrive too much.
HELP ME PLEASE :-)
Graham ...
|
710.13 | should be that hard !! | PLDVAX::JACQUES | | Fri Jul 15 1988 09:17 | 21 |
| If all you want is a clean sound, it should be pretty easy. I would
set the master on 10. Tweak the channel vol from off to just where
it kicks in. If that is too loud for your application, turn the
volume on the guitar down. For clean sound, many people set the
volume on their guitar to 8 or less. If you have powerful pickups,
they can overdrive the input stage on an amp. Rolling the vol
back to 8 or less cleans up the sound 100%. You could also use
a volume pedal to keep the volume in check. Make sure the tone
settings on the guitar are on 10, or else you will get a muddy sound.
Experimenting at a gig is kinda risky. I would arrive plenty early
and if you can't get the Marshall to sound properly don't use it.
Bring your Yamaha along just in case.
Are you thinking of buying this beast, or just trying it for the
hell of it ??
Good luck,
Mark Jacques
|
710.14 | correction | PLDVAX::JACQUES | | Fri Jul 15 1988 09:19 | 3 |
| re .13 the titie should be <Shouldn't be that hard>
|
710.15 | If all else fails I'll turn it UP LOUD | VIVIAN::BENNETT | Ridin' along in my L.A.V.c | Fri Jul 15 1988 10:07 | 43 |
| Re .13
I'll try as you say, I hope it works.
No I'm not going to buy the stack.
The reason for using it is 3 fold :-
1. the rest of the band use stacks of some sort or another
and I come over a little tinny in comparison.
The Yamaha is a 2x10.
8 x 12 gives a somewhat bigger sound I believe :-)
2. We're recording tonights gig for prosperity as the drummer
is comming your side of the pond for a year. We're playing
our last gig next week, again we will record it, perhaps
I'll have the marshall settings right by then !
3. who can resist the offer of Chopping a meaty 12 bar blues
through a Marshall stack ?
(No '3 chord crap' comments please, It's all I can play :-)).
I think I've mentioned the band *several* time previously !
:-)
But we do the usual R 'n B stuff with a bit of guts and momentum.
SRV's Scuttle Buttin' 60's Soul (20 mins) Medley
Chuck Berry John Lee Hooker
Dr Feelgood Muddy Waters
George Thorghgood (sp) B.B King
Blues Brothers (covers of covers!)
9 Below Zero Blues Band
Booker T. and the M.G's - Green Onions
Champs - Tequilla Early Z.Z. Top
Etc. etc. etc.
Anybody else in a band(s) they're proud to tell us about ?
or has this been done ?
Graham ...
|
710.16 | Don't fret, you can't get a lousy sound with a marshall! | MARKER::BUCKLEY | I wish it was Summertime - all year | Fri Jul 15 1988 10:36 | 38 |
|
Well, basically the 100WT marshalls have a lot of headroom in them
to begin with, so you need not worry about going into massive overdrive
(esp with single coil pickups)!
If its a small pub, I would guess you would NOT want to put your
100 marshall's master volume to 4. That is LOUD (or at least it
used to be with my 100WT marshall!) I wouldn't be afraid to use
a bit of the preamp volume, it helps add meat to your sound. I
mean, you don't wanna play totally clean, do you?
Anyway, note the Marshall has two inputs. There is a high gain
(I) and low gain (II) input. The low gain input is almost too low gain
for my tastes, but you may check it out. Here is `my' recommended
starting point:
Place guitar on most used pickup setting (volume and tone should
be to 10). Plug into the High gain input (no. I). Place the
Presence, Bass, Mid, Treble and Preamp to 5. Turn up the master
volume to taste. You should notice the bass doesn't kick in til
the master volume is around 2. See how it sounds. At this point,
you can boost or cut any frequencies you see fit, as well as adjusting
the preamp control to get more or less distortion. If you boost,
you'll notice you'll get more volume, you can cut this at the master
if its too loud.
When I play a strat thru a marshall, and I wanna get a clean but
singing sound, here are the settings I use (note this is a 50WT
Marshall):
Pres Bass Mid Treb Preamp Master
6 10 8-9 6-8 7 10
Yeah, master 10, but like I said its a 50WT...
Buck
|
710.17 | ARRRROOOOOO!!!!! | DRUID::RANDERSON | | Fri Jul 15 1988 11:08 | 7 |
|
RE: .13
> I am gigging in a local pup tonight
Poor dog! I hope he can hold all your equipment! 8^)))))
|
710.18 | It was Alright on the night ! | VIVIAN::BENNETT | Ridin' along in my L.A.V.c | Mon Jul 18 1988 07:19 | 14 |
| Thanx Gents,
To those that suggested setting for the Marshall stack.
The pup/pub on suffered minor discomfort, the reel of
sticky tape worked wonders !
I started nice and low, but it did creep up.
We encored with 'Alright Now' (how origonal !)
low, mid, High. guitar and pre-amp all on 10
master on about 6. BOSH !!!
My love affair with my car is over. Isn't the
Marshall gorgeous !?
Graham ...
|
710.19 | Mostly rhythm guitar btw | BUSY::JMINVILLE | Illegitimus Non Tatum Carborundem | Mon Nov 27 1989 10:10 | 57 |
| OK, after awhile with my current setup, I've realized that I hate
my sound. It always sounds OK to me live, but when I listen back
to tapes it sounds totally tinny and trebly, yucko.
Here's the current setup:
Ibanez RG550 (two humbuckers neck/bridge with a single in the
middle)
|
|
V
ProCo Rat distortion pedal (set at close to unity gain)
|
|
V
Rockman Eq (12-band) (unity gain)
|
|
V
ART Multiverb (yup, unity gain again)
|
|
V
Fender Twin (1971-ish w/master volume)
I used to run the Eq like this (more or less):
_ _
_ _ _ - - _
0 _ _ _ -
And the twin like this:
Bass 7
Mid 4 - 5
Treb 7 - 8
Now I run the Eq like this:
_ _ - - _
0 _ _ - - - _ _
And the twin like this:
Bass 7 - 8
Mid 3 - 4
Treb 4 - 5
I like this tone much, much better. Obviously, it's a lot less
thin-sounding, and much warmer and fatter. The problem now is that
I don't seem to cut through the rest of the band as well. I run the
guit vol/tone at 10 because I don't like the way the tone rolls off
when set any lower (sometimes I cut the guit volume back to like 8 or
so). I've been running the twin at channel volume of 4 - 5 and
master vol at 4 - 5.
What's a boy to do? (Besides getting a Marshall ;^)
joe.
|
710.20 | | ASAHI::COOPER | In pumps life that I must feel | Mon Nov 27 1989 10:55 | 8 |
| Joe,
I learned a cool trick from Mike Butkus one afternoon. Try turning up
your Presence all the way, and you treble all the way down. It gives me
a bright but punchy tone thats cuts like a knife... Perhaps you can use
your EQ if the Twin doesn't have a presence control.
jc (Who loves this tone)
|
710.21 | | BUSY::JMINVILLE | Illegitimus Non Tatum Carborundem | Mon Nov 27 1989 11:14 | 4 |
| No presence on the twin. It's probably just a matter of tweaking
and boosting the volume a tad...
joe.
|
710.22 | | ASAHI::COOPER | In pumps life that I must feel | Mon Nov 27 1989 11:29 | 4 |
| Thats the attitude Joe ! Nothing like cranking the volume up to
solve tone problems !
jc (Who sez pain makes everything sound good !)
|
710.23 | ...also mostly rhythm | CSC32::G_HOUSE | I just can't slow down | Mon Nov 27 1989 17:13 | 15 |
| Hey Joe, I had the same problems when I got my MP-1.
I set up all these patches (some on suggestions of folks here) that I
thought sounded great. ...and they did, by themselves. But with the
rest of the band they sounded real trebly and stuck out like a sore
thumb most of the time. Before the next weeks practice I went through
them and basically flattened out the EQ on all them, specifically
avoided pumping up the high end and presence. I also added some
compression and a little more reverb.
They work a LOT better now. It probably has something to do with my
playing style (essentually sloppy), but I find that lots of high end
sounds really bad for me.
Greg
|
710.24 | | MARKER::BUCKLEY | Get high on a NEW THING! | Mon Nov 27 1989 18:03 | 6 |
| RE: MP-1 tone settings.
Yo GH, you play a Charvel, right? Those guitars can sounds thin and
trebly real easy (due to the ceramic nature of those pickups!). I know
the settings on my guits had to be real trebly due to the thickness and
general bassyness of my guitar/pickups.
|
710.25 | Join us all this day the road is mine... | DECXPS::GWILLIAMS | | Tue Nov 28 1989 09:03 | 17 |
|
RE: MP-1 tone settings.
I would have to agree with Buckley in that Charvels can
sound real thin and trebly. I have known three friends with Model 4's
and they all had that high end, trebly sound. One stuffed toilet
paper into the back where his tremelo springs were and it really
gave him better sound. (Why he used toilet paper I'll never know!!?)
Try stuffing the quickerpickerupper in there and see if it helps.
It never hurts to try.
Best of luck to ya,
R.C.
|
710.26 | no spring cover? | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Fractured Fairy Tales | Tue Nov 28 1989 09:15 | 5 |
| On the subject of tone, why do I see so many strat owners taking the
tremelo spring cover off the back of their axes? Does this affect
tone? If so, how?
Steve
|
710.27 | ala Jimi | STAR::TPROULX | | Tue Nov 28 1989 09:21 | 8 |
| re -.1
Speaking for myself, it makes it easier to change strings
and make adjustments. I usually leave it on, though. I
doubt very much that it would have any affect on the tone
of the instrument. Might facilitate feedback, though...
-Tom
|
710.28 | Twang,twang... | ASAHI::COOPER | In pumps life that I must feel | Tue Nov 28 1989 09:57 | 17 |
| I leave the cover off of my Charvel's for a couple reasons... As
with Tom, it's a lot easier to mess with the tremelo settings (the
spring claw). As we've discussed in the past, when you set up a
floyd-type trem, it's very important to have the bezel plate parallel
to the guitar body, and these adjustments are made with the spring
claw...
I also find that that I do get a better tone when the guitar gets
squirelly and starts feeding back (the good type with natural
harmonics). With the cover, the feedback takes a bit longer to
get started, and tends to break a lot faster too. I feel that my
style lends itself well to that feedback.
There are also the old "ala-Jimi" tricks of picking the springs
etc...
jc (Who sez: Feedback is where it's at!)
|
710.29 | the real deal | RICKS::CALCAGNI | punk jazz | Tue Nov 28 1989 10:15 | 4 |
| the real reason is it looks cooler when you play
with your teeth :-|
/rick
|
710.30 | | ASAHI::COOPER | In pumps life that I must feel | Tue Nov 28 1989 10:20 | 4 |
| I'm ROOOLLLING !! Thats it ! Thats what I was trying to say in
my last reply !
Agagagagaga
|
710.31 | Hey! Someone stuffed my guitar with PAPER! | CSC32::G_HOUSE | I just can't slow down | Tue Nov 28 1989 12:59 | 20 |
| re: .24
Yeah, I play that Charvel most of the time. I agree that sometimes it
sounds kind of bright (and sort of sterile). I think that I actually
set up most of those patched using my Hamer too, which probably didn't
help, and in my front bedroom with lotsa carpet and stuff on the walls
to damp the sound. Maybe my battery is getting low too.
re: .25
How does the toilet paper in the springs help with the Mod 4s sounding
thin? I admit that it would certainly be convenient if I needed a
quick wipe or something though... 8^)
FWIW, I adjust my trem, then put the spring cover back on. Keeps the
edges of the cavity from getting all beat up. I left mine off for a
couple of weeks awhile back when I was changing the trem arm assembly
and I couldn't tell a difference in the sound.
Greg (Why not? I'll try anything once)
|
710.32 | HIGH END ROLLOFF??? | HAMER::KRON | BILL-THE-WONDER-MUTANT | Tue Nov 28 1989 14:22 | 6 |
| I believe the problem with the guitar in .19 is that the pots
are bleeding too much high end to ground when the volume is
turned down.....there was an article in G.P. several years ago,
and if memory serves me, all that's involved is soldering a small
capacitor across one of the existing connections...very basic and
no changes to the existing wiring
|
710.33 | High end rolloff -- cure | BUSY::JMINVILLE | Probitas laudatur et alget | Tue Nov 28 1989 14:48 | 4 |
| RE: .32 thanks for the tip. Any idea how long ago it was?
I've got issues that go back a year-and-a-half or so.
joe.
|
710.34 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Rock and Roll doctor | Wed Nov 29 1989 07:31 | 4 |
| re: .32 Have you ever tried this? I did on one of my tele's and it totally
changed the sound of the guitar, I took it out.
dbii
|
710.35 | Me either... | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Wed Nov 29 1989 09:21 | 20 |
|
Me, too Dave... made my new (steve built) tele sound pretty tinny!
I've heard that using an RC network with the .001 cap and a 150k
resistor works better.. but I haven't tried it?? Anybody done so??
| | |---grnd
| |
| |----to output
|
|---from switch
-.oo1cap-
-150k- between switch lead and output lead...
Regards,
Steve
|
710.36 | Follow the impulse you have,I'll show you the wayy | DECXPS::GWILLIAMS | | Wed Nov 29 1989 12:56 | 10 |
|
re: .31 (on .25)
Don't quote me on this but I think he got the idea on something
Eddie VH did once.I not very friendly with this person anymore so
all I can say is try it for the "WTF".
Happy wiping,
R.C.
|
710.37 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Rock and Roll doctor | Thu Nov 30 1989 08:22 | 6 |
| If your pickups aren't total wimps (it is a pickup loading problem, your volume
control loads the pickup output down and sacrafices the highs in the process)
then changing the pots to a higher value (like 1Meg) helps a great deal. On my
thinline it came that way already (those old fender humbuckers are real wimps)
dbii
|