T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
537.21 | Wireless | PABLO::DUBE | | Wed Jan 07 1987 08:45 | 13 |
| I'm thinking about getting a wireless setup for my guitar for when
I play live situations. However, I am completely ignorant in this
area.
Can anybody help me with some recommendations? I would like to know
some good brands, what stores have the best deals, and how much it
would cost to get a quality wireless setup. I'm willing to spend
about $300 if that's what it takes.
Thanks in advance,
-Dan
|
537.22 | Samson | MOZART::KLOSTERMAN | Stevie K | Wed Jan 07 1987 10:15 | 6 |
|
Don't even bother with N.A.D.
Samson (sp?) makes a great unit in the $300-$400 range. One of the guys
in our band uses it and it seems to be good for a least one city block. Don't
know who carries it.
|
537.23 | | RANGLY::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Thu Jan 08 1987 09:02 | 15 |
| I had one of the early sampson units and it was junk......I took
it abck for a refund after about two weeks. If I remember correctly
it cost about $270 a few years ago.
From what I've read about wireless units unless you're willing to
spend about $700-1000 you can't get a truely reliable unit. The
reliable units ahve two antenna systems so that dead spots in the
room are minimized. Even with the best units there are rooms that
you cannot use the unit in, due to interference, rotating fans overhead
etc.
It's too badd 'cus I loved not having to unwind my cord after each
set......
dave
|
537.24 | Maybe a different unit? | MAHLER::KLOSTERMAN | Stevie K | Mon Jan 12 1987 09:48 | 11 |
| RE:.2
Samson <> junk.
I played with a Samson at the Ranch House about two months ago. I was
outside in the parking lot, easily 150' away, and the bass was cutting through
clean and clear. To be honest I haven't thoroughly checked them out, but all
the people I know that own the Samson unit love it. Perhaps they've come out
with a different model?
Next time I see Al, I'll ask him for the specs on it.
|
537.25 | VHF definetly! | STOWMA::LANGE | | Tue Jan 13 1987 09:02 | 17 |
| I've used both aforementioned units, and realized that unless you
spend >$700-$1000< you're not going to get a real quality cordless.
If you are going to get one I suggest you get get one with VHF
(double ant.)reception,or you're going to pick up police,and CB scanners...
Well at least I do in,and around the Worcester area(with the single
ant. models).
The reception in the Cove,and McGillicuddys,is fine, but like the
Auditorium,and E.M.Loews got poor reception probably cuz of the
police station is so close. Also Manhattans off of rt.56 in N.Oxford
for the same reason.
So make sure you get a good one,it will be well worth the $$$$.
jl.
|
537.27 | Wireless systems HELP !! PLEASE !! | ECAVAX::VALASEK | | Tue Dec 22 1987 11:18 | 16 |
| Anyone have any comments regarding the NADY wireless systems. I
was looking at the low-end NADY gear. I have no experience regarding
wireless systems and any input would be greatly appreciated. I guess
the reason I was thinking about one was to get rid of the cords
on stage. I have read some different things regarding distance
limitations, spurious transmissions, VHF, etc. etc.
For my needs I just want something that can reach approximately
20 feet maximum, and provide a good clear signal with good reproduction
of the guitar signal. I was looking at NADY due to price, and didn't
know anything about it. Any help would be nice, I tend to trust
noters rather than retail salespeople.
Thanks,
Tony
|
537.28 | ok | ERASER::BUCKLEY | Street Lethal | Tue Dec 22 1987 14:09 | 10 |
|
Nady is *ok*. One thing I like about it is the fact that the
receiver adds a bit of gain/compression (one of the two, maybe both?)
to your signal making it a tad nastier. One thing I didn't like
about it was dead spots. I guess they're ok, I'd make sure I had
a good supply of fresh batteries on hand for a gig, and check out
the room for the dead spots at the sound check (then avoid them
during the gig, if you remember). I is a great concept though.
wjb
|
537.29 | | DISSRV::CROWLEY | ere lies David St. 'ubbins, and why not! | Tue Dec 22 1987 14:27 | 16 |
|
wjb is right. I have a Nady wireless and they sure love to eat
batteries! You can get away with an hour playing time tops before
you start getting into trouble. Best bet is to get nicad rechargables.
They'll last a little less time, (45 minutes or so) but then you
just recharge 'em.
Another thing is I'd never use it without having a sound check first.
Deadspots can be a real hassle, and sometimes, there's so many of
them, I just go with a cord.
You can also definately add some gain with it. I've gotten some
nasty sounds with mine that I couldn't have got without.
ralph
|
537.30 | JB Player wireless | CSSE::CLARK | dodging lions and wasting time | Wed Dec 23 1987 09:56 | 4 |
| JB Player has a wireless guitar. Fitchburg Music has one. It looks
like a Jackson.
-Dave
|
537.1 | Effects ? | SAMURI::COOPER | Jeff Cooper - System Mangler 354-7611 | Fri Mar 18 1988 10:57 | 2 |
| Oh yeah, how will wireless work with effects ?
JC
|
537.2 | Dog Breath | SONATA::LANGE | Pat Robertson? Armageddon Outta Here | Fri Mar 18 1988 10:59 | 2 |
| You better hope you are using Signal if you jump into a crowd of
screaming women....
|
537.3 | Yo, Jar Head ! | SAMURI::COOPER | Jeff Cooper - System Mangler 354-7611 | Fri Mar 18 1988 11:29 | 7 |
| Yo Jeffrey, whats happenin' ?
Naw, the babes in SC like sweaty, smelly spandex clad metal heads...
I'm working on covering my BC Rich in Fishnet stockings; That'll
look killer...
JC
|
537.4 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | Wilderness king of da' bluz | Sat Mar 19 1988 13:06 | 6 |
| I used to have a sampson...it was junk (IMO) at any rate any room
may have dead spots where the wireless won't work. They work ok
with effects (at least mine did when it worked at all). Spend lots
of $$$ or expect to have occasional difficulties.
dave
|
537.5 | True Diversity ... | SAMURI::COOPER | Jeff Cooper - System Mangler 354-7611 | Mon Mar 21 1988 10:51 | 7 |
| Dave,
Was your SAMPSON one of those $500 "true diversity" systems ?
A guy was trying to sell one of those to me...
Jeff
|
537.6 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | Wilderness king of da' bluz | Tue Mar 22 1988 06:44 | 4 |
| No it was one of the first units they sold...not the diversity system
which is supposed to be much better...
dave
|
537.7 | | UPWARD::HEISER | Red Sea Beach Club | Fri Mar 30 1990 16:54 | 7 |
| I'm not real familiar with these systems, but I was wondering:
How do you change preamp channels under a wireless environment? do
you have to get a separate unit for the channel selector or do the
units have more than one broadcast band?
Mike
|
537.8 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Fri Mar 30 1990 17:20 | 39 |
| Huh ??
Mike, the wireless transmitter just takes the place of the
cord between your guitar and your amp input.
Channel switching occurs as it would've before wireless...(i.e. a stomp
box, midi controller -whatever).
BTW - It's been two years since I bought my wireless, so I'll do a follow
up on .0 here...
I bought a Sampson Wireless Performer Series (or something like that).
It's pretty cool.
-I've never had a any dead spots while playing with it. The range is
about 400yds (line of sight). Trouble is, when your that far away,
it takes the sound a while to get to you, so it's tough to play.
-It's small and light
-The transmitter is a pain in the a$$ !! There is a little plastic door
that holds the battery inside the beltpack. It lasts about three batteries.
After that, it refuses to stay closed - Duct tape time. The replacement
door costs a whooping $18 ! (It's about 3/4"x1" and plastic!)
-When the battery pops out, or if you shut off the transmitter the receiver
picks up pink noise from the atmosphere (like a cheap AM radio) and if
your amp volume is up, you WILL blow people thru the wall. Right Steve ?
-These things CHOW batteries ! Use Duracell and maybe you'll get one night out
of a 9v...
-Makes posing much easir !
All in all, it's a good unit, and I've seen ones going for $800-$1000 that don't
work as nearly well. Don't bother replacing the xmiter door when it
breaks...Use duct tape.
jc (Who sez: try it, you'll like it !)
|
537.9 | exit | VLNVAX::ALECLAIRE | | Fri Mar 30 1990 17:21 | 10 |
| I had a Nady cheepy, I was able to go outside my house ( which has
cement-blocks and bricks outside of that, THICK walls ) and out in the
back yard and the dang thing worked! It ate batteries ( Get
rechargables, you won't regret it ) and I broke the transmitter because
I was thinking of installing it inside a guitar and took it apart once
too many times. Daddy's, where I didn't buy it, said they could get
another transmitterf for about 100$, it's something I just put off
until later. I was happy with mine. It was a lot of Fun.
Really want to pump up the Marshall and take a guitar and drive
across the street to see just how far and loud I can get...
|
537.10 | | UPWARD::HEISER | Red Sea Beach Club | Fri Mar 30 1990 18:47 | 15 |
| >Channel switching occurs as it would've before wireless...(i.e. a stomp
>box, midi controller -whatever).
Okay Coop, if you're playing in a huge hall and run down the aisle for
a solo, you have to run all the way back to change preamp channels?
That's what I was asking, I knew it replaced the guitar cord. Be nice
if you could remotely operate the preamp too. Unless you don't do such
wild things ;-) (climbing on your stack, soloing from the catwalks,
etc.)
Re: eating batteries
Don't they have AC adaptors?
Mike
|
537.11 | It's late on a Friday... | SMURF::LAMBERT | The Delicate Sound of Thunder | Fri Mar 30 1990 19:20 | 14 |
| re: <<< Note 537.10 by UPWARD::HEISER "Red Sea Beach Club" >>>
> Re: eating batteries
> Don't they have AC adaptors?
Think about that for a minute.
:-)
It's the transmitter they're talking about - the thing you wear on the
guitar strap or whatever. Do you really want to trade your guitar cord
for a wireless unit that has a a/c adapter cord attached? :-)
-- Sam
|
537.12 | Need a 4x10 and a power amp much worse though... | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Greg House - DTN 523-2722 | Fri Mar 30 1990 19:39 | 10 |
| re: trading guitar cord for AC power cord
Sounds a little counterproductive to me, but what do I know... :-)
re: Coop
Which Sampson do you have and how much do they go for these days?
Greg (who always wanted a wireless, but doesn't really know why since
he doesn't pose much and tends to stand near his amp anyway)
|
537.13 | ;-) | CSC32::H_SO | | Fri Mar 30 1990 20:18 | 6 |
|
RE -.1
Oh, you know you're a poseur, Greg! ;-)
J.
|
537.14 | | UPWARD::HEISER | Red Sea Beach Club | Mon Apr 02 1990 13:16 | 8 |
| Re: power cord vs. guitar cord
I realize it was late, but I was referring to the main unit, not the
transmitter.
Bad thing about Notes sometimes, things get lost in translation.
Mike
|
537.15 | Only a battery at one end... | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Greg House - DTN 523-2722 | Mon Apr 02 1990 14:04 | 4 |
| The main unit's not usually battery powered. The batteries they're
talking about using up are the ones in the transmitter.
Greg
|
537.16 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Tue Apr 03 1990 09:28 | 21 |
| Gee Greg, I dunno what the model number is on mine. It's a Sampson
Performer Series... They go for about $200 (I paid more for mine, I
guess cuz it was a new product, and I'm a sucker ;).
The other thing I forgot to mention:
Other folks have asked about signal loss (or a reduction in gain) by using
wireless systems. Mine has a DBx noise reduction system in it, and
if you ask me, I think I might GAIN a little gain from it ! The rig seems
to scream a little faster with the wireless. I wonder why ?
Alan can vouch that it works pretty good and is fun as hell to be
wireless. BTW - When you lose a battery, it's very subtle, and it;'s
quite well advertised to the trained ear (it's starts to wheeze a little),
so it's not like your going to lose a signal in th middle of a song.
I've started to notice the wheeze and have played a whole set before
I change batteries...This wheeze it almost like a subtle (but VERY cheap)
fuzz box, so you acoustic types would notice right away ! Those
who play hi-gain rigs would think it was extra crunch !
jc
|
537.17 | tell your wife you love her BEFORE buying a wireless | FREEBE::REAUME | rollin' rack! | Tue Apr 03 1990 10:08 | 21 |
| I have a Samson Stage 22 true diversity wireless (as opposed to
false diversity?) and it's great. I think they've cut down on battery
drain in the transmitter because mine lasts about 6 gigs. Then the
led on the transmitter stays on solid telling you to get a new duracell
soon or play air guitar unexpectedly . Actually I've never had it
totally lose signal, it just gets wimpy then I look at the xmitter
and I know it's about to go. And like Coop mentioned, if you power
down the transmitter and any stray signal is in the room (or a Peavey
DataBass) be prepared for white noise city. Try this in Hot Lead
mode and watch a club clear out real fast. So you have to turn down
the volume on the receiver to avoid this. A mute button here would
have been nice! I've had no problem with the battery cover on the
transmitter either. I think it's a new design since it never fully
detaches from the case, just slides and hinges open.
But other than that the Stage 22 is a nice unit. What did I pay?
I know I'm just asking for hate mail, but my wife got it for me
for my last birthday. (I think) She paid a little less than $300.
And this IS the same wife that saw UPS deliver all those LPMG boxes
to our house.
-BoOm-
|
537.18 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Tue Apr 03 1990 11:30 | 15 |
| Yo Boom,
Sounds like your receiver is same-same to mine. Kinda closes and then
slides in so that the two little hooks catch under something ?
---------------------------------
|
| (Attached to xmtr>>>>>
-- -----------------------------
| |
\ \--
___>
My little hooks snapped twice, but the door is a b*tch to replace and costs
mega $$$$ !!!
|
537.19 | ups power supply | RAVEN1::BLAIR | Lancelot Link, Secret Chimp | Thu Apr 05 1990 14:28 | 9 |
|
Hey Coop. Maybe you could get one of those weed eater engines that
you carry on your back and hook up a generator to it. That way you
could eliminate the ac adapter cord and do smoke effects at the same
time!
ring ding ding ding (<--- 2 cycle noises)
;^)
|
537.20 | Riiiiingadingdingdingding...ding... | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Thu Apr 05 1990 14:58 | 11 |
| Awesome idea !
And I can maybe rig up one of those 'Paul Gilbert' triple pickers
like he used with his Makita power drill. 'cept mine will be
2 stroke powered...
Anyone ever see that gizmo ??
Talk about speed picking !!! Yeow !
jc
|
537.26 | "wireLESS , is less more ? " | BOSOX::MCLEMENT | 2 necks are better than 1 | Tue Jul 10 1990 11:43 | 6 |
|
Has anybody ever heard of REXER wireless systems; if you have
what do you think or heard about them.
mARk
|
537.31 | A plug for good business-sense... Samson Doors | GSRC::COOPER | Major MIDI Rack Puke (tm) | Tue Mar 12 1991 18:59 | 23 |
| A while ago I posted this. Thought about it a bit and wrote a note to
Samson (okay, it was a couple of pages...). I told them I was pissed
off because of the poor engineering on the battery door, and was sick
of spending $18 on the stupid door. Check out my old note here:
-The transmitter is a pain in the a$$ !! There is a little plastic door
that holds the battery inside the beltpack. It lasts about three batteries.
After that, it refuses to stay closed - Duct tape time. The replacement
door costs a whooping $18 ! (It's about 3/4"x1" and plastic!)
-When the battery pops out, or if you shut off the transmitter the receiver
picks up pink noise from the atmosphere (like a cheap AM radio) and if
your amp volume is up, you WILL blow people thru the wall. Right Steve ?
Anyway, I sent my letter less that two weeks ago, and guess what ??
Today in the mail was a very nice letter and 10 new battery doors
for the transmitter. I'm impressed. I love it when that happens.
It was worth my time, and I don't feel as bad now about purchasing
a Samson unit. Samson (I beleive is owned by Sam Ash) is on my "Good
People" list now.
jc (Happy camper)
|
537.32 | | CHEFS::DALLISON | Stick it to ya! | Thu Mar 14 1991 07:29 | 2 |
|
Tut tut, should have bought a Nady dude 8^)
|
537.33 | Samson vs. Nady ?? | GSRC::COOPER | Major MIDI Rack Puke (tm) | Thu Mar 14 1991 12:57 | 9 |
| When I shopped for my wireless I tried a couple of Nady units
and didn't get the freq. response of the Samson...plus the Nady
that was comparable was $110 more than the Samson...
But maybe your right. I'm just really excited that Samson was cool and
sent me a fist full of battery doors... I like good business
practices.
jc
|
537.34 | I still like Sampson better | DASXPS::MCLEMENT | Silence & Tears | Thu Mar 14 1991 15:52 | 5 |
|
I have a Sampson and my battery door is fine (knock on wood), but I
only use mine when we play out. Now I know who to call when (or if)
it happens to me.........;^)
MarkO
|
537.35 | wireless vocal mikes??? | QRYCHE::STARR | Spontaneity has its time and place. | Wed Jun 26 1991 17:11 | 9 |
| (What the heck, I'll post it here too! Someone might have some info.....)
I have a question about wireless vocal mikes (posted in both MUSIC and
COMMUSIC). I'm looking at two used systems for the same price - does anyone
have any comments on either system, good or bad??? The two I'm looking at
are Nady 201-HT and Sampson Concert Series RH-1.
thanx,
alan
|
537.36 | check past issues of EM & Mix | EZ2GET::STEWART | No, I mean Real Music. | Wed Jun 26 1991 17:27 | 8 |
|
The Nady 201 is atrue-diversity" system (I think) which means that it
uses two RF front ends (or at least two antennae) to reduce the
dropouts that happen as the xmttr moves. Is that Sampson model also a
true-diversity system?
|
537.37 | fyi | HAVASU::HEISER | hold me, I'm a fermata | Fri Sep 20 1991 17:45 | 13 |
| When EVH was here a couple weeks ago, he had some interesting comments
about wireless units in his interview.
The funniest part was where he talked about problems playing in cities
where there is a 100Kwatt radio station down the street from the venue.
He said eyebrows really raise when you have Milli Vanilli coming thru
your rig ;-)
At least in Phoenix, the only station like that is one of the best rock
stations in the country (1 of 2 in the U.S. that covers a whole state.
Delaware has the other, but Arizona is *HUGE*).
Mike
|
537.38 | | KDX200::COOPER | Step UP to the RACK ! | Tue Feb 18 1992 10:17 | 46 |
| I think I should go on record here...
I just finished a nasty "Wireless Ordeal", and thought I should post
some of my thoughts.
But first,
>>> Thanks VERY much to Walter at Rice Music (again). <<<
Back in early November I bought a Audio Technica AT-mumble rack mounted
wireless. I really sharp unit. Features out the wha-zoo etc... Trouble
is it was extremely noizy with my rig. I was bummin' that I'd spent $600
for a wireless that didn't work as well as the $200 Samson I had.
The really strange thing is that I knew a lot of guys who used the AT with
absolutely no problems. I thought maybe I had a defective unit so Walter got
me another one from AT. Still no luck. Intense feedback, rushing noise
etc...
Anyway, going way beyond the call of duty, Walter gave me store credit and
ordered me the new Samson Concert Series. It's true diversity, full-rack
mounted, DBX n/r etc... I was a little concerned about the Samson too because
of the troubles I'd had with the battery door on my SR2 unit. I should say
though, that the SR2 served well for almost 4 years before I sold it to a
fellow noter (whom I think is still using it, BTW).
Anyway, the new Samson came in yesterday - I beleive it's a CRX-3 or something
like that. I brought it to practice last night and used it sucessfully all
night long. I'm in love with it.
Here's the rundown:
True Diversity
Two front-mounted antennaes
Full 19" EIA std
Front mounted volume knob
back mounted Line/Instrum jacks (you can use both simultaneously, if ya want)
Adjustable squelch for each channel.
Belt pack has a standby switch and a power switch.
AND A TOUGH BATTERY DOOR !
Anyway, I'm really happy with the new unit.
jc (Wireless MIDI Rack Puke)
|
537.39 | ;^) | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Now I'm down in it | Tue Feb 18 1992 10:21 | 4 |
| Betcha that really helps out with your practices in that little
rehearsal room, huh?
gh
|
537.40 | | KDX200::COOPER | Step UP to the RACK ! | Tue Feb 18 1992 10:25 | 4 |
| Well it's cool to play WarPigs (a loooonngggg toon) and be able to walk up to
the 7-11 for a coke. :)
jc
|
537.41 | Like Todd Rundgren | WEDOIT::KELLYJ | Master of rhythm, Phd in swing | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:53 | 2 |
| ...and besides, it's hard to do flips on the trampoline with that
stinkin' wire attached to the amp ;7)
|
537.42 | | DPE::STARR | They call it Paradise, I don't know why | Tue Feb 18 1992 13:19 | 10 |
| Hey, speaking of wireless, can anyone give me any info about the Sampson
Concert Series RH-1 handheld mike wireless system? I had asked about this
a while ago, but never really got an answer. I don't know anything about it
does anyone else? Is it considered a good one, or one of their lower lines?
True diversity?
thanks,
alan
P.S. re: -1, you're thinking of Nils Lofgren, not Todd Rundgren!
|
537.43 | | KDX200::COOPER | Step UP to the RACK ! | Tue Feb 18 1992 13:29 | 15 |
| Hi Alan,
I don't have my documents in front of me, but I beleive the RH1 is
the Mike-Based unit that goes along with the CRX3 that I picked up
yesterday. I'll double check, but I'm quite sure. Mine is the "Concert
Series"... Brand new to me, but I say "They rool!".
FWIW - Mp1's are NOTORIOUSLY fussy about what they are put together with.
Being so "hi gain" they tend to bring out the worst in things like
MultiFX, Wireless, Pickups/Guitar. My advise is "Bring your rig with you"
when you need to try something new...Advise I should follow myelf sometimes.
jc (Who also had major mating problems with his SGE)
PS - The AT I had worked just fine thru my Marshall at home...
|
537.44 | Mp1's sensative? | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Now I'm down in it | Tue Feb 18 1992 16:56 | 11 |
| >Being so "hi gain" they tend to bring out the worst in things like
>MultiFX, Wireless, Pickups/Guitar.
I agree with the recommendation about running whatever you're thinking
about buying through your rig, but I totally disagree about Mp-1's
being sensative to what guitar or pickups you run through them. I put
like 10 different guitars with all different kinds of pickups through
mine and it sounded almost exactly the same with any of them (except a
*real* cheesy one that had really low output pickups).
Greg
|
537.45 | | KDX200::COOPER | Step UP to the RACK ! | Tue Feb 18 1992 17:19 | 23 |
| Maybe sensitive was a poor choise of words... Did I say that ??
Lemme try again - If you plug a shite guitar into my rig you'll
be inundated with foul sounds and a *lot* of racket. Ummm, wait.
If you plug a unpotted/unshielded/older_designed_pickup_infested
guitar it's not gonna like it. My Gibson, Fender, Dean, Kramer and
BC Rich all squeeled like stuck pigs. My Ibanez is well loved by
the Mp1, as was me Shovel (Rest in Peice) :)
Now, what the Mp1 will also do is step all over a beautiful warm-fat-whatever
toned instrument (like a vintage LP or strat) and try to make it scream like
an Ibanez. Strats (especially) HATED my Mp1, unless I was in "Plexi-Mode".
Now ya take that same Strat and LesPaul and plug it into a Marshall and
that Marshall just kinda takes it all in stride - the the beauty of all
the diverse tones shines thru.
The bottom line: The Mp1 molests the shit out of a guitar signal. :)
I like it like that.
Izzat better ?
:)_
|
537.46 | Yep | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Now I'm down in it | Tue Feb 18 1992 18:30 | 8 |
| >The bottom line: The Mp1 molests the shit out of a guitar signal. :)
>I like it like that.
>
>Izzat better ?
Much better, I agree completely.
gh (who sez "NO molesting my guitar signal")
|
537.47 | Nady Unit At $80 NEW!!! | RICKS::ROST | Subconcious desire to be deaf | Tue Jun 30 1992 06:26 | 7 |
| Nady is now selling a new low-cost 49 MHz system. The guitar unit is
available at $80 mail order! Has anyone seen/tried this yet, the "Mini
49"? I know 49 Mhz isn't the best way to go but the price is awfully
tempting...then again you do get what you pay for. The next cheapest
Nady from the same dealer is $200, true diversity is close to $300.
Barfbaghead
|
537.48 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Ren, what's `TFSO' mean ? | Tue Jun 30 1992 08:19 | 7 |
| I'd be wary, VERY wary ! The Nady 101 is a great unit (the $200 one)
for the price, but is just *adequate* for a working band. Munches
batteries like a cheap Christmas toy, and alters your tone (ever so
slightly). Sounds like this unit would be for the musician who already
has a Zoom gadget and a Micro Marshall ... 8^)
Jerry ...
|
537.49 | | MARX::SAKELARIS | | Wed Jul 01 1992 09:42 | 6 |
|
>>I know 49 Mhz isn't the best way to go
Just curious Brian, but whats the intrinsic problem with 49 MHz?
"sakman"
|
537.50 | Phone In Your Solos | RICKS::ROST | Dan Quayle Memorial Spelling Award | Wed Jul 01 1992 09:50 | 15 |
| The 49 Mhz band is populated by such things as cordless telephones, RC
models, etc. Since the band is crowded, the chance that at any given
location you might pick up someone's telephone call in addition to
your guitar are pretty good. Also, there are not a lot of alternate
channels available, an issue if the whole band is going wireless, since
each unit has to be on a separate channel.
However, the 49 MHz units *are* cheap. Nady offered a 49 MHz unit about
ten years ago that broke the $200 barrier, now they've busted $100.
Basically as you go up in frequency, cost of the unit goes up. That's
why the Nady 201 VHF diversity unit is about half the price of their
similar UHF unit.
Brian
|
537.51 | | CAVLRY::BUCK | ghostly love | Wed Jul 01 1992 09:55 | 4 |
| Would that go both ways?!? Eg, would granma's weekly call to her
daughter in Duluth be infultrated with your hot Yngwie licks??
;')
|
537.52 | good one, Buck! yuk yuk | RAVEN1::BLAIR | Belay that nose picking, Cadet! | Wed Jul 01 1992 10:04 | 1 |
|
|
537.53 | 49 mHz is OK for practice rigs | EZ2GET::STEWART | Cordless Bungee Jump Instructor | Wed Jul 01 1992 10:06 | 6 |
|
What's really cool is when you dial grandma's phone into NORAD with
the tapping bit in Eruption...
|
537.54 | wireless worrior! | REPAIR::KISIEL | Who do you think you are? | Tue Jul 28 1992 06:59 | 12 |
|
I bought a NADY 201 guitar wireless the other day and so far it's just
been great.....the wireless unit's not been too bad either. It's not
only fun but looks cool, I've got an outdoor gig coming up soon, so
i'll have to see how it handles that. The place i'm playing is right
under the flight path of aeroplanes so i'm hopeing it won't turn out
like spinal tap at the airbase!!!
Ewan
|
537.55 | | NEWOA::DALLISON | and a start of a new one | Wed Jul 29 1992 02:25 | 6 |
| Hey Ewan,
Be sure to lock in the frequency correctly with the little screw gizmo
thingy.
Good Luck!
|
537.56 | | HEDRON::DAVEB | Life is | Wed Jul 29 1992 12:01 | 11 |
| I'm considering a Nady 201 VHF wireless unit with the rack adaptor. Why not
the rack unit? First cost, second the antenna on the 201 are on the front,
the 650 has the antenna on the back and they wouldn't clear my rack well enough
to stick up straight in the air.
So experiences good or bad with the 201???
thanks
dbii
|
537.57 | Breathing? | RICKS::ROST | Evil twin of Billy Ray Cyrus | Wed Jul 29 1992 12:56 | 18 |
| Re: Nady 201
Funny you should ask, I'm borrowing one right now and found that with
two of my instruments, the companding circuit causes loss of attack on
soft notes, almost like a volume pedal swell. But with my Steinberger
bass, I tried running the volume up and down, played soft, played hard
and had no problems. ????? Must not be my week 8^) 8^)
I have *no* idea what's happening. The guy who owns the unit had
noticed the same behavior once in a while. There's also a bit of
compression which isn't too bad, and since the unit has an in-to-out
maximum gain of +4 db, you can drive your amp harder.
It gets its first trial by fire on two gigs back to back tonight, I'll
let you know in the morning what I think.
Brian
|
537.58 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Ren, what's `TFSO' mean ? | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:06 | 7 |
| I've got a Nady 101 ...
With the adjutable gain cranked, I don't hear any loss of attack on
soft notes. Yeah, there's *some* compression, but not enough to be a
big deal.
Jerry
|
537.59 | Four Years and Still No Problems | GROOVE::DADDIECO | That's Just The Way It Is ..... | Wed Jul 29 1992 14:09 | 18 |
537.60 | fee tines a Nady | RAVEN1::BLAIR | You sick little monkey! | Thu Jul 30 1992 11:30 | 1 |
|
|
537.61 | Buttwheat!!! | EZ2GET::STEWART | Logic is the beginning of wisdom | Thu Jul 30 1992 13:26 | 1 |
|
|
537.62 | | CSC32::R_DESKO | Rick Desko CSC/CS DTN 592-4613 | Wed Nov 18 1992 11:39 | 5 |
| Anybody using a Nady RW-1? I'm looking at going wireless (for bass)
and adding this to the rack would be real convenient.
Thanks,
Rick
|
537.63 | need a new toy! | EZ2GET::STEWART | an E-ticket ride at Neuro-Disney | Thu Aug 04 1994 09:30 | 7 |
|
So, what's the latest scoop on wireless stuff? Looks like VHF
diversity is probably the most cost-effective way to go. How much are
the Samson and Nady units going for? Any others to consider?
|
537.64 | | FREEBE::REAUME | click -- buzz -- whirr | Thu Aug 04 1994 10:55 | 10 |
|
I'm using a Shure L-4 diversity receiver and I'm real happy with:
1) sound quality and reception
2) battery life in the transmitter (11-12 hours!)
3) construction quality of both recsiver and transmiter
4) valu for the price (~$400)
-John R-
|
537.65 | "AudiotechnicaG300 or something" | COMET::LAURICH | | Fri Aug 05 1994 01:18 | 10 |
|
I just got a Audiotechnica300 for my b-day and I'm happy with
it. You can get one on on sale for around $250-300. The cool thing
about this unit is that it has a built in function that lets you do
chanel switching on your amp. There is a button on about a 7 inch
wire that you can velcro to your axe, and then just push it when you
want to switch. No more foot switch.
Jeff
|
537.66 | more EMI for the neighborhood | EZ2GET::STEWART | an E-ticket ride at Neuro-Disney | Mon Aug 08 1994 18:56 | 8 |
|
Just picked up a Samson SR22 with two transmitters for $175 out of the
Recycler...talk about your true diversity...two receivers, two
transmitters, I feel like Ted Turner...
And the battery doors on both transmitters are intact!
|
537.67 | Beyerdynamic | COMICS::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Wed Aug 10 1994 09:58 | 21 |
| Over here (UK) our local shops seem to be concentrating on the
Beyerdynamic wireless. It isn't diversity but I don't think I need
diversity. The Duracell batteries last ages (I've been changing them
after every gig only to discover it is still going strong after many
hours practising). No problems with picking up the signal but it does
crackle now and then, the shop have offered to take it back if I can't
figure out what's causing it.
Price around �189. The people in the shops warned against the Nady
claiming they are too unreliable.
I bought mine to speed up the setup time rather than to be able to
wander (we have small stages over here anyway) but it is nice to stand
by the outside door in the evening and get the cool outside air when
everyone else is sweltering inside.
The other plus point is of course the improved sound quality. I can
actually use the volume pot on the guitar without it sounding too
muffled now.
tmp
|
537.68 | Wireless for 1995? | BSS::MANTHEI | | Tue Sep 12 1995 16:59 | 7 |
| Anyone mind if we revive this discussion?
Last entries seem to be about a year old. What's the best Wireless to
buy today? Are there any good UHF or multichannel systems that
humans can afford?
Mike
|
537.69 | Me again | KERNEL::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Wed Sep 13 1995 08:09 | 17 |
| I don't think the scene has changed much over here (UK). I'm
reasonably happy with what I bought (see .-2). The only thing I would
change is I would try out a diversity system as I get quite a few
dropouts even in line of sight, nothing too serious though. I haven't
had the guts to wander off the stage either, I'm not sure what I'd do
if I did. I'm not a very animated player :-)
I managed to tape the receiver into a rack shelf and run a wire to an
aerial on the top of my rack box, so it not technically being
rack-mountable hasn't stopped me rack-mounting it.
The only thing that worried me is that you can get so far away from the
amp, there's a noticeable time delay between what you play and what you
hear. It must be terrible playing large stages (if you don't have
decent foldback).
tmp
|
537.70 | | MSBCS::EVANS | | Wed Sep 13 1995 08:38 | 6 |
| I think the delay would be do to the speed of sound rather than the speed of
the wireless.
Jim
|
537.71 | | KDX200::COOPER | RuffRuff - BowWow! | Wed Sep 13 1995 09:32 | 9 |
| It is (the speed of sound) - and it will REALLY mess with you. :-)
Whatever one ends up getting, I recommend getting a good one.
Diversity is a MUST if you're near a city! And one that won't gobble
three batteries a night is also important (as is an auto-off on your
belt-pack.
I've never heard of a UHF system (mine's VHF) - What gives?
jc
|
537.72 | UHF Wireless | BSS::MANTHEI | | Wed Sep 13 1995 15:11 | 25 |
| UHF (ultra-high freq) is generally cleaner 'cuz there are less people
up there. Most of the Nady/Samson/AT/Shure systems are on the VHF
channels - creating clutter.
I've tried the cheap Nady systems in the past and was not too happy.
Just one glitch during a quiet song tends to make them expendible for
my tastes.
There's a newer Nady that's 4 UHF channels (switchable) for about $700
(catalog). Has anyone tried it?
Samson also makes a fully synthesized (something like 50 user
selectable channels) for around $1500 or so. It also runs way up into
cellular freq's (I think - 900mhz+). I'm wondering if I need to get
something like this to get away from the "toy" freq's. These, BTW, are
not available at your local music store. I find them in specialty
catalogs or shops. ...can't afford them, I just find them.
Still, the thing that really *irks* me is when you're quiet for a
measure for a vocal solo thing, and a wireless goes
Ppppphhhhththtthgblwx!!!!! It's probably not as noticable for
thrash metal....
Mike
|
537.73 | | BSS::MANTHEI | | Wed Sep 13 1995 15:16 | 8 |
| oops
I don't want anyone to get the wrong idea 'bout that thrash metal
comment. I'd like to do a metal band thing (Coop and I have tossed
the idea around some..) but now I have a gig doin' a much more
"sensitive" pop/rock/jazz thing.
-my amp still goes to 11. I don't always get to turn it up to there.
Mike.
|
537.74 | | KDX200::COOPER | RuffRuff - BowWow! | Wed Sep 13 1995 15:24 | 6 |
| Bailiff!
;-)
$1500 for a wireless?? Are you insane??? Buy more 4x12's first!!
:-)
|
537.75 | NewsFlash! Wireless causes insanity! | BSS::MANTHEI | | Wed Sep 13 1995 15:43 | 9 |
| Yes.
I am in the pursuit of quality.
However, when I get it, I won't be able to blame my equipment anymore.
I might have to learn to play... ;-)
Sure.... give me grief now. After I have it, you'll be jealous!!!
eh?
Mike
|
537.76 | | KDX200::COOPER | RuffRuff - BowWow! | Wed Sep 13 1995 15:44 | 3 |
| Why!? I've been cutting back on my 4x12's...
I've only got a pair of JCM900's now...
:-)
|
537.77 | Yeah right... | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | My other piano is a Steinway | Wed Sep 13 1995 17:17 | 8 |
| > However, when I get it, I won't be able to blame my equipment anymore.
> ;-)
This is the lie we all tell ourselves over and over...
;-)
db - fellow GTS sufferer
|