T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
471.1 | Suspension chords | MORRIS::JACQUES | | Thu Jan 21 1988 08:34 | 58 |
|
These types of chords are also known as suspension chords, since
a major fourth or other interval is suspended within the chord
voicing. If you were around during the sixties folk/rock era,
you must remember the hundreds of popular songs that were based
on the "Pedal Point" technique. They would start with a major
chord, suspend the fourth note above the major third, then drop
down to the second below the major third. Heres a good example
which centers around the open A chord.
====== nut ====== nut ====o= nut
------ ------ ------
234 23 23
------ ------ ------
4
------ ------ ------
open A chord A/Dsus A/Bsus
Heres an example in open D
====== ====== =====o (open)
------ ------ ------
111 bar 111 bar 1
------ ------ ------
2 23 2
------ ------ ------
open d chord D/Gsus D/Esus
There were litterally hundreds of songs done in open A or D
using this method. If I need to do this in the key of E, I would
use a capo on the second fret, and play it as if it were in open D.
It's tough to do this with bar chords but if you play a four note
major chord (non barred), you can do this anywhere on the neck.
A few examples of songs that use this were "Mr Tamborine Man",and
"Needles And Pins". Many of them were done on 12 string guitar which
gave them a real big full sound.
You don't usually hear anyone play suspension chords with the
suspended notes in the bass registers, but it is ocasionally done.
A good reference for understanding chord positions is a book called
something like "The guitarists picture chord book" which gives chords
in standard notation along with a closeup photo of a person playing
the chord. I have this book at home and find it quite helpful when
reading sheet music. It is also helpful if you are arranging,
composing, or just trying to learn new chords.
I hope this helps !!!
Mark J.
Hey Mr Tamborine Man, play a song for me, I'm not sleepy and there
is no place I'm going to....twang,twang,twang,twang...........
|
471.2 | Notated Bass | AQUA::ROST | I feel your innuendo | Thu Jan 21 1988 08:42 | 9 |
|
While it's true that an E major chord with the A addded is a sus4,
I always thought that E/A meant an E major chord with the A added
as the *bottom* note....
I.e. if you had a bass player, he would play an A under that chord
instead of an E. If you just wanted Esus4, it would be so notated.
|
471.3 | Yup. | FSTTOO::GALLO | Ralph's Pretty Good Grocery. | Thu Jan 21 1988 08:54 | 4 |
| Since I am a bass player,and I dont read,I always used it as a
bass note.
/tomg
|
471.4 | Reaching for the Uncommon Chord | GOONEY::LANGE | | Thu Jan 21 1988 09:28 | 12 |
| .2 & .3 are correct...and most times you don't have to sacrifice
any tones of the chord...I can think of quite a few ways of playing
an E triad with an A on the bottom. Even with the example you gave,
playing an E in the first postition, using an open A, you take care
of the fifth (B) with the open 2nd string.
Most pianists notate charts like this, maybe because their instrument
is alot more visual than ours. I've seen alot of A/B, when it could
have been A11th, but that could spawn a whole new discussion on
what name to give a chord, as in most cases there is more than one.
like G13 #11 could also be C# 7th #9/G (bass)??? (food for thought)
|
471.5 | Bass notes and Inversions | ERASER::BUCKLEY | Street Lethal | Thu Jan 21 1988 09:56 | 16 |
|
.2, .3, & .4 are correct in their analysis of E/A in which A (or
the second note of the two) is to be played as the bass bote.
If reference to a question like E/B, where B is already included
in a E chord (be it major or minor), it is then suggesting a specific
inversion of E to be played. E/B is E is with the 5th scale degree
in the bass (second inversion). You might also see E/G# which would
be E Major with the 3rd degree in the bass (first inversion). E/G
would be E Minor with the b3rd degree in the bass.
A typical example of E/G# you might recognize is the final E chord
in `A Day in the Life' by the Beatles. It's a very recognizable
sound.
wjb
|
471.6 | .2 is the correct answer | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Thu Jan 21 1988 13:28 | 12 |
| A/B is also occasionally notated as A/II.
> I've seen alot of A/B, when it could have been A11th,
I think you meant A9 right? But actually you really meant A add9
(sometimes spelled A+9).
Not that I want to start another name that chord debate but Asus4, A11
and A+11 are three different chords. They each imply a distinct
set of notes.
db
|
471.7 | RE: .6 | GOONEY::LANGE | | Thu Jan 21 1988 13:56 | 10 |
| > I think you meant A9 right? But actually you really meant A add9
(sometimes spelled A+9).
No, I meant A11th...analysis... A/B, an A triad over B bass, A triad
being A, C#, E, the A is the dominant 7th, C# is the 9th, and E
is the 11th in relationship to B...now it might not be the best
voicing of an 11th chord seeing how I've omited the 3rd and the
5th tones, but that's a common thing with guitar players...6 strings
and five fingers and whatnot (10 if you're Holdsworth... ;-)
|
471.8 | Re: .7 | ERASER::BUCKLEY | Street Lethal | Thu Jan 21 1988 14:47 | 3 |
|
No 3rd, well that's stretching things a bit far, even from jazz
standards.
|
471.9 | If A Then B? | AQUA::ROST | I feel your innuendo | Thu Jan 21 1988 15:58 | 13 |
|
Re: .7
Sorry, Jeff, but while you have indeed described an 11th chord,
the root is *B* not A, since as you pointed out, the A is the dominant
7th, etc.
So at best it would be a B11.....
But the point of notating A/B is so you *don't* play the F# or D#
that would be the 5th and 3rd of a B chord.
|
471.10 | I be da Bro of Jeff | GOONEY::LANGE | Ray | Thu Jan 21 1988 16:13 | 4 |
| Sorry, my mistake...I did mean B11th beacuse I was describing the
tones in relationship to the B major scale...just got them mixed
up. (B/A...A/B)
|
471.11 | You can call me Ray...... | SONATA::LANGE | | Thu Jan 21 1988 16:23 | 2 |
| Sorry Brian...;-)
you have me,and my more musically knowledgeble brother confused.
|
471.12 | Oooh, confusion! | ERASER::BUCKLEY | Street Lethal | Fri Jan 22 1988 09:35 | 1 |
|
|
471.13 | ugh! | EARWIG::BRIGGS | Richard Briggs | Fri Jan 22 1988 12:40 | 5 |
| But I thought it was a simple question!
Richard
Thanks for the input, I will print off and analyse accordingly.
|
471.14 | Too many 3rds spoil the voicing | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Fri Jan 22 1988 13:45 | 10 |
| Funny about leaving out thirds. It used to be that when working
out arrangements I could just look at the keyboard player and he'd
go "yeah, ok Dave, I know - leave out the third".
It just always seemed to me that most chord voicings in which the
third appeared more than once didn't sound right. You can double,
triple or quadruple the root or the fifth and it still sounds
cool, but double the third and it usually sounds "busy".
db
|
471.15 | 3rds stronger than wimpy 5ths | ERASER::BUCKLEY | Street Lethal | Fri Jan 22 1988 14:16 | 14 |
|
re: .14
Doubling the thrid always works in traditional counterpoint,
better than fifths and roots.
To me, a tension really isn't a tension unless the third is in the
chord. Like, for instance, play A and G say that sounds like a
dominant 7th, but C# and G and there's no question. Same with ninths
and 11s.
Maybe just this persons view,
wjb
|
471.16 | Thirds | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Mon Jan 25 1988 10:48 | 12 |
| I almost never leave out the third. I usually told the keyboard
player that when he was supposed to be lurking in the background.
To my ears, whenever he played a third, particularly as part of
a compact triad it brought the keyboards too far front and sorta
made everything sound busy. I suppose that's related to why you
say 5ths sound wimpy, but sometimes that's called for.
On keyboards, I almost never play thirds with the left hand unless
its the very bottom note (when the bass line moves to the 3rd).
db
|
471.17 | More from the FYI dept. | ERASER::BUCKLEY | Street Lethal | Mon Jan 25 1988 11:07 | 8 |
|
Personally, I use octaves and ninths for keyboards, but I thought
wez wuz talkin geetar. I think guitars emphasizing thirds sounds
ballsy, esp with a lot of midrange and distortion (make them real
up front!)
wjb
|
471.18 | | PNO::HEISER | I survived the Federales de M�xico | Wed Apr 19 1989 14:47 | 4 |
| Can someone please explain standard and tablature notation?
Thanks,
Mike
|
471.19 | | AQUA::ROST | DWI,favorite pastime of the average guy | Wed Apr 19 1989 16:58 | 14 |
|
Standard notation is normal sheet music notation...with a staff,
clef, time signature, etc.
Tablature is a shorthand which has lines representing the strings
of the instrument (6 for guitar, 5 for banjo, 4 for bass, mandolin,
fiddle, etc.) and numbers representing fret locations.
Tab is usually considered an "easier" notation because it directly
indicates fingerings. However, it is typically only found in
instructional materials. You wouldn't expect to do a gig playing
from charts and find anything but standard notation there....unless
you're in Nashville, where they use the "Nashville system" yet another
type of shorthand notation.
|
471.20 | Let me check one thing out. | CHEFS::BFITZGERALD | Barry | Fri May 25 1990 10:04 | 20 |
| I'm two years behind reading these notes but if you're still out
there....
I (Bassist) would play a B if I saw A/B same as .2,.3 & et al.
By the same token, if I saw E/B, I would play B.
I compose with Bass and Guitar and submit that if you see E/B
and you have a Bass player to play the B, the guitarist need not
play the 2nd inversion ...he could play I, II or III.
Sometimes it is very desirable that way. If you've no Bass player
then perhaps you would have to play the 2nd Inversion in this example.
My point is that if a B is played at the Bass note (by whatever)
the inversion is up to the guitarist etc.
Baz.
|