T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
396.1 | DOn't forget the big M | INK::BUCKLEY | Buck | Mon Nov 16 1987 09:00 | 5 |
| Also, Marshall is producing their own EL34's these days.
I could live with just Mesa, GT, and RCA for choices...
wjb
|
396.2 | Time to become self sufficent! | VIDEO::BUSENBARK | | Mon Nov 16 1987 09:03 | 9 |
| This will certainly change the price on tubes and it will mean
an increase. Mesa use to get alot of there tubes from Sylvania and GE.
Most of the other tube manufacturers are foreign,like Phillip's
of Canada and there are some manufacturers in Europe(Telefunken?) and the
Soviet Bloc.
It may also have an effect on Tube amp prices...
Rick
|
396.3 | Big problems for Mr. Smith | NANOOK::PELLERIN | | Mon Nov 16 1987 12:28 | 25 |
|
Sylvania is the largest supplier of tubes to Mesa. The way it works (according
to Randall Smith) is: Tubes that meet Mesa's standards (the toughest) are
bought up by Mesa. The next in line is Peavey, and those rejected by Peavey go
to GT. So, even though they're matched, they accept the lowest standards for
tubes.
I think I had better call Boogie and order about a 5 year supply.......
The problem of course is that Randal Smith worked with the old codgers at
the sylvania tube division for a long time to come up with the tubes he will
accept. They did some slight design modifications from the earlier tubes to
come up with the current STR-415 standard and its relatives. Now he'll either
have to make the tubes himself (way too much investment here) or find someone
else to make them (equally as tough since there's such a small market for
tubes these days that no company in its right mind will invest in changes.)
It is my guess that Randall (If the sylvania tube operation really *does* close)
will come up with some electronic inovation to make it NOT MATTER what the
quality of tubes (within reason) you put in a Boogie. But this will probably
only buy him a couple of years. How long will it be before RCA gives up on this
dying industry ???
-BAP
|
396.4 | Down the Tubes | FTMUDG::HENDERSON | | Wed Mar 02 1988 23:08 | 10 |
| I am getting ready to change out the tubes in my amp and I noticed
that some distributers offer *matched* tubes. Some examples would
be Mesa Boogie, Carvin(GTs), and Groove Tubes. What is the meaning of
*matched tubes*? Identical electrical parameters? What would be
the advantage of *matched* versus unmatched? The tubes I will be
changing will be 6L6 GC and 12AX7s. Any clues??
Slightly confused,
Don
|
396.5 | Push In, Pull Out | AQUA::ROST | Tush, tush, you lose your push | Thu Mar 03 1988 16:00 | 20 |
|
Re: tube matching
A common amplifier configuration used in many guitar amps is the
"push-pull" configuration.
What this means is that you have *pairs* of output tubes (your 6L6s).
One tube "pushes" the other "pulls"; i.e. one tube drives the speaker
cone forward, the other pulls it back.
For minimum distortion of the waveform, you would like the amount
of push and pull available to be the same, thus you want the tubes
matched.
It can be shown on the service bench that matched tubes provide
less distortion and more usable volume than mismatched tubes.
BTW this is a simplified explanation, which I assume is what you
were asking for....
|
396.6 | save your money | RICKS::CALCAGNI | | Thu Mar 03 1988 17:21 | 22 |
| More on matched tubes:
In case it wasn't clear from the previous message, tube matching is
only a factor in the output power tubes (in your case 6L6s, other
common types are 6V6 and EL-34). 12AX7s are used in pre-amp stages
and you don't need to match them. In fact, each 12AX7 tube contains
two separate tube circuits which are in a sense already "matched"
(by virtue of sharing a number of physical characteristics).
The advantages of tube matching in an amplifier output circuit are
more power, less distortion, and longer tube life. However, for
applications such as guitar amplifiers, I think the need for tube
matching has been overstated by companies who make money convincing
people they need matched tubes. I know two very good amp mechanics
who have told me that any pair of tubes from the same manufacturer
will do; the tubes are close enough that differences in power,
distortion, and tube life are negligible for these designs.
Output tube matching is critical for military electronics
and hi-fi, but not rock and roll.
/rick
|
396.7 | Let's go tubing! | FTMUDG::HENDERSON | | Fri Mar 04 1988 00:33 | 5 |
| Thanks Rost and Rick! That clears things up nicely. I will
go with the matched power tubes.
Thanks again,
Don
|
396.8 | Balance your AMP instead... | CCYLON::ANDERSON | | Fri Mar 04 1988 17:03 | 8 |
| If you are rally serious about "Matched" tubes balance your amp
instead. You may hve to add a couple of pots into yourpower output
stage but you can use standard tubes and save the money. The things
to be gained are as previously stated and adjustment is simple if
you have the test equipment. It only takes a few minutes to do.
Jim
|
396.9 | | CAVLRY::BUCK | | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:09 | 3 |
| Just who *does* make tubes for GT & Mesa?
|
396.10 | History of the valve part I. | CMBOOT::EVANS | if you don't C# you'll Bb | Tue Apr 24 1990 08:03 | 17 |
|
The transistor started to develop just after the WWII using
Germanium, late 50's the the Silicon transistor was being mass produced
appearing almost exclusivly in consumer goods by the early 60's.
Most of the British & American valve making plant was sold to the
developing Baltic states (Eastern Block) save some specialist UHF stuff
which is still used today for the military. As the demand dropped off
in the East for valve (tube to you US folks) technology the majority of
the plant went to China who now produce 90% of all valves in the world
& according to my mate Phil at Marshall they are the best ever, they've
made them more robust internally & squeeze more out of them so I guess
they ain't all bad eh?
Cheers
Pete.
|
396.11 | No More HM, Comrade | AQUA::ROST | Bad imitation of Jerry Jemmott | Tue Apr 24 1990 08:29 | 9 |
|
> China who now produce 90% of all valves in the world
Good, after the next political upheaval, all the tube amps in the world
will be idled...
8^) 8^) 8^)
Brian
|
396.12 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | Miz Fletcher, we're NOT sending help! | Tue Apr 24 1990 09:35 | 6 |
| Anyone know anything about this new TRANSISTOR preamp tube...supposedly
it just replaces V1 in an amp or preamp, never goes bad, interfaces
with other *real* preamp tubes, and is supposed to SOUND just like the
best Groove or MESA preamp tube...
Anyone?
|
396.13 | Mesa, GT | AQUA::ROST | Bad imitation of Jerry Jemmott | Tue Apr 24 1990 10:10 | 11 |
|
Mesa used to offer a "FET-tron" transistor tube substitute that
replaced the first 12AX7 in your amp to provide a quieter front end.
The first Boogie I ever saw/heard, back in 1980, came with one of
these, plus a 12AX7 to pop in if you preferred all tube raunch.
Apparently, they stopped making them, perhaps someone else has started?
BTW, Groove Tubes has been making solid-state replacements for tube
*rectifiers* for years. I have a 5AU4 replacement in my Bassman.
Brian
|
396.14 | HELP The Silicon is | CMBOOT::EVANS | if you don't C# you'll Bb | Tue Apr 24 1990 10:41 | 8 |
|
re.12
Hmmmmm I'm dubious, I believe in using the right tool for the job,
so use valves in a valve amp. Maybe I'm paranoid or something but I've
never rated any Hibrid configs I've gotten my mits on.
Cheers
Pete.
|
396.15 | Are they related?? | WEFXEM::COTE | A friendly stranger in a black sedan | Tue Apr 24 1990 11:01 | 4 |
| Brian, what's the purpose of the 5AU4, and what's the differnce
betwixt that and a 5AR4??
Edd
|
396.16 | Keep Your Schematics In Your Office, Edd? | AQUA::ROST | Bad imitation of Jerry Jemmott | Tue Apr 24 1990 12:31 | 12 |
|
I *think* 5AU4 was the number, anyway it's a tube diode, uh maybe a
couple of diodes? Anyway, it's used as a rectifier...the schematic I
have for my amp shows six diodes (3 + 3) and not a tube...you figger
it. It's a large bottle, similar in size to a 6L6.
The GT replacement is a small thing, looks like a mushroom 8^) 8^)
and plugs right into the tube socket. Some folks argue tube rectifiers
are better as the supply voltage comes up more slowly. Anyway,
*everybody* uses solid-state rectifiers these days in tube amps.
Brian
|
396.17 | Nothing blows up here in MRO2... | WEFXEM::COTE | A friendly stranger in a black sedan | Tue Apr 24 1990 12:44 | 4 |
| Nope, not in my office, but, if you're interested I do have a print-
set for the Ampeg at home.
Edd
|
396.18 | Groove Tube Resource Book available! | SMOGGY::TURNER | | Wed Apr 17 1991 13:54 | 25 |
| Groove Tubes (GT Electronics)
Box 4753
Sylmar, CA 91342
(818)362-1551
GT will be glad to provide you with a copy of their book: "The Tube
Amp Book" by R. Aspen Pittman. It lists for $15.00 and explains
just how tubes work and why matched tubes perform better. There
is a section on amplifier modifications for Marshalls, Ampgegs,
Fenders. There are some articles like: Survival tips for Tube amps,
Troubleshooting your Tube Amp. There's a tube cross-reference guide
and then there's a section that gives a paragraph on each type of
tube they supply. A large part of the book contains schematics for
many tube amps (probably the more popular, but there are exceptions).
For the tube die-hards out there, you'll enjoy the reprint from
Guitar Player (Oct 88) of "My All Time Favorite Amps".
Additionally, there's a current Tube Amp Manufacturer directory.
I've got an extra copy (one) available if anyone wants it (new
condition) I'll UPS it to you for $14.00. First come - you get it!
Play on,
Paul
|
396.19 | Tube Amp Book III... | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Wed Apr 17 1991 14:07 | 6 |
| BTW folks,there are 2 printings of this book which have been published
so far and a third was due in Feb/Mar and I heard it is
late....It is suppose to be updated to have more than previous issues.
Rick
|