T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
320.1 | Hello, Anyone out there ?? | COUGAR::JACQUES | | Wed Aug 19 1987 12:23 | 26 |
| Hello !! Is any body out there ??
I'm a little surprised that this notes has not gotten any
replies. Aren't there any Telecaster owners out there in note
land ? Maybe I should compare my Fender Telecaster to an
Ibanez or Carvin to get your attention !!
A couple of days ago I was in Mr. C's music in Marlboro and
discussed Tele pickups with Jim. He believes that the only
pickup system that will buy me any discernable improvement
is the EMG since they are both active, and low impedence.
I am beginning to consider a change of heart. Although the
EMG's look a little different than stock pickups, they are
a direct replacement with no "Hacking" required. If they
can transform my typical Telecaster into a lean mean screaming
machine I might consider them. I would like to hear a Tele or
similar copy with EMG's before I make a decision. Also I should
find out how much the system costs before I go any further. I
can invision a fairly high pricetag, since the system includes
the pickups, active pots, and replacement switch, all prewired
for easy installation.
I anxiously await your replies.
Mark Jacques
|
320.2 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Thu Aug 20 1987 15:02 | 20 |
| Mark, I disagree with him, EMG's are good pickups but they are not
the only thing that will improve you sound. The best sounding Tele
pickups I've ever heard were the Semour Duncan's that use the alinco
magnets (I forget the name/number) these are what jeff Beck uses.
Duncan also makes tele stacks in vintage and hot versions, no hum.
None of these require that you modify the guitar in any way. Dimarzio
(I personally don't care for dimarzio's but it's just a personal
thing) also makes direct replacement pickups for tele's that will
alter the sound...including some very hot ones that scream...
EMG active pickups scare me a bit...what happens when the active
circuits dioe in the middle of a performance and the guitar has
to go to the shop for who knows how long? With a standard passive
control system your guitar is nearly foolproof...
besides the emg's aren't that much better (in my humble opinion).
it's a tough choice
dave
|
320.3 | Swap til I Drop !! | MORRIS::JACQUES | | Thu Aug 20 1987 15:30 | 8 |
| What I will probably do is find a shop that'll let me swap
till I'm happy with the sound. Gettin' rid of the hum would
be nice seeing as how I'll be spending $100 or more, therefore
I might consider the vintage stacked pickups, if they sound
good.
Mark J.
|
320.4 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Fri Aug 21 1987 15:00 | 9 |
| Semour Duncan's guarantee is such that if you don't like the pickups
you may exchange them for another type of equal or greater value
(paying the extra of course) within 30 days of the original purchase.
In practice this works well I took a set of SSL-4 strat pickups
back *8* months later and exchanged them for SSL-1's, no problem.
good luck
dave
|
320.5 | I'll have a quarter pounder, with cheese !!! | MORRIS::JACQUES | | Mon Aug 31 1987 14:50 | 26 |
| This weekend I broke down and bought a new neck position
pickup for the Telecaster. I ended up buying a Seymour
Duncan Quarter Pound tele rhythm pickup (STR3) from
Macduff's Music in Shrewsbury. After swapping it for the
original (10 minute project), I found that my neck pickup
now outpowers my bridge pickup. I was sort of hoping it
would be a close match to my bridge pickup, but anyways.
I picked up a Quarter pound Tele lead pickup today (STL3)
and plan to install it tonight. This will take a little
longer. Since I have to remove the entire bridge, I will
have to remove the strings. Hopefully, I will be happy
with the final results. I am considering buying a new
bridge for this guitar, while I am in the process of
taking it apart. The stock Tele bridge has only 3 adjustments
for intonation, so the strings are intonated in pairs. I have
seen direct replacement Tele bridges that have a separate
saddle for each string, and have substantially more mass
under each string. Does anyone have any idea how much a bridge
would cost, and whether or not it's a big improvement.
I would appreciate any info in regards to what bridge is
best, how much it costs, and where to buy it.
Mark Jacques
|
320.6 | Seymourized !!!! | COUGAR::JACQUES | | Tue Sep 01 1987 13:46 | 46 |
| Last night I installed the STL3 bridge pickup in my Telecaster.
Before doing so I called around about a new bridge, just out
of curiousity, and to my surprise Wurlitzers in Worcester had
one in stock for only $22.50, so I went over and bought one. When
I went to install it on my Tele, one of the holes for the mounting
screws would not line up with my guitar, so I decided not to use it.
Actually this bridge was not as heavey duty as I would have liked
anyways so I think I'll look araound some more for one that is
more rugged. I don't think Wurlitzer will give me a refund, but I'll
just take it out in strings or something.
The net result is I like the sound of the new pickups a lot. It
has that nice gutsy Tele sound that I was after. I think I will
play the guitar with these pickups for a few weeks to make sure
I like them. If for some reason I decide I don't I can always
swap them for another set of Seymour Duncans. The guitar still
has a slight hum, if I stand right in front of my amp, but as long
as I turn away from the amp the hum is hardly noticable.
Having read all the Seymour Duncan literature I was curious about
the neck pickup. Seymour emphasizes that his quarter pounders have
quarter inch pole pieces, but the neck pickup doesn't.
I suppose there isn't enough room for quarter inch pole pieces on
a Tele rhythm pickup since it is so small. Output wise, I think
the rhythm pickup is a pretty close match to the bridge pickup
despite the difference in size, and by adjusting the neck pickup
as high as possible, and lowering the bridge pickup, I think I can
match them very closely.
The rhythm pickup now gives me a punchy sound much like the
rhythm pickup on a Strat. The bridge pickup has plenty of brightness
without bighting your ear off, like the stock pickup, but also has
a lot more sustain, and overall a more balanced sound.
Not only was I unhappy with the sound of my old stock pickups,
I also had trouble tuning it with my quartz tuner. The rhythm pickup
is generally recommended for tuning, but the tele rhythm pickup
doesn't put out a high enough level to get a good reading on the
tuner. With the quarter pounder in there I get a nice steady
reading on my tuner.
A satisfied Seymour Duncan customer
|
320.7 | Summary update request | COOKIE::NORTON | gpd | Sat Jan 23 1988 15:48 | 17 |
| I'm interested in an update and summary, since I'd like to do a
similar (identical) upgrade. Specifically:
1. What did you finally decide on? (model nos.)
2. Was it really a no cutting required job?
3. What was the overall cost (approx) for just the pickup parts?
4. Is it really quiet?
5. Is it louder (higher output than the noisy stock pickups)?
Danke
d
|
320.8 | | RANGLY::BOTTOM_DAVID | Feats don't fail me now | Wed Jan 27 1988 07:49 | 6 |
| You mayu want to think about the EMG select line of pickups. I recently
put two into my strat. They are exssentially noise free (as good as my
Duncan hot stacks), have a pretty good sound, and only cost $17.50
each from Stewart McDonald's. INstalled with no modifications required.
dbII
|
320.9 | Pickups for Tele's | WEDOIT::KELLYJ | Master of rhythm, Phd in swing | Fri Sep 06 1991 18:13 | 12 |
| Yo dudesters,
The other guitar in the band I play in is hot to get a Tele.
Apparently you can get them with three different p/u types: standard
'dot' magnet Fender p/u's, Lace-units, or DiMarzio's. I assume you
get two of whatever style you choose; that is, you cannot get, say,
a DiMarzio with a Lace, at least not stock.
What do you cats think about the three choices?
Thanks,
Jon Jpitr
|
320.10 | Re-issue tele p/u mod ?? | TRUCKS::LITTEN | | Fri Jan 10 1992 08:53 | 39 |
| Help !!!
I have just heard that my old band from eight years ago is to do a reunion
gig this summer, and I am keen to use my "new" 50's re-issue Fender jap
telecaster. I am also the owner of a late seventies strat with Di Marzio's.
Here is my question:
Would it help if I got to replace my tele pickups ? A big question I know, but
here are my thoughts........
Are the Fender jap reissues as good in the pickup department as their standard
US counterparts ?
I see that my local stockist has replacement Fender Vintage pickups.....are
these likely to be different to those fitted to my guitar?
Should I go for Seymour Duncan's...if so, what are the new models to go for
bearing in mind that I prefer a good vintage sound?
(BTW, if I were to change, I have a strong preference for SD's/Fender pu's,
so take that as a given please...)
I cannot do an A/B comparison with my strat since it has the more middly DM
sound......for all I know, my stock tele re-issue P/U's MAY be fine in a live
situation.
It's the old problem, and hence my note, I will be content with my tele as it
is and will make the best of it, BUT if any of you folks have been in my
situation and would offer your opinion.....I'm listening!!
BTW, I have read the previous replies to this note, but the results seem
inconclusive, and the market/product offerings since that time may have moved
on including experiences from other Noters.
Look forward to your thoughts.....
Dave
|
320.11 | | PHAROS::SAKELARIS | | Fri Jan 10 1992 11:38 | 46 |
| Whoa Dave, hold on here. Since you asked for opinion, I offer mine.
Insofar as replacing the pickups because they're Japanese...no
dude...that ain't it. It's not like they got this magic dust only in
only the California plant. If the pickup is made to the same
specification as some other, then in my mind it don't matter. If its a
dude whose eyes are a different shape than mine who made 'em, its still
the same pickup.
Having said that, I will also tell you that I almost always change
pickups. I do this because of a confidence factor. To me a pickup from
SD or DiMarzio is a known value and/or quality. I've owned 'em both and
have never been disappointed. Its like in Golf where if you have
confidence in a driver, you'll most definitely hit it better than one
you don't have the same confidence in. (This is the real difference
between golf clubs - the rest is largely hype).
I'm thinking that whats really going on in your mind is a question of
confidence, and that I can't answer for you. I would only tell you that
were I in your place I'd ask myself the first question - do I like the
sound of this axe as it is? If yes, then you *needn't* go any further.
You may want to however, thinking that maybe you'll like something else
better. Ok then again, were it me I wouldn't replace the pickups with a
"vintage" or same type pickup. I'd go for something with a little
more of whatever it is I think I'm looking for. For example, you can
buy exact replacements for Fenders, but Dimarzio offers HS2's; a
vintage type but with a little more ... or HS3's with a lot more....
Having said that I'll be the first to admit that if you're playing in
front of an audience, they couldn't care less. The difference is
virtually indistinguishable. I was playing at a gig once and my buddy,
who is not a guitar player, asked about why I bring two different
guitars. I explained the diffence between dual coil Humbuckers and
single coil pickups. He was surprised that *I* could hear a difference,
like I had some kind of extraordinary hearing. I guess I can understand
that since I'm sure I couldn't tell the difference between two
different clarinets.
I guess what I'm saying is don't anguish over your selection. Don't
bullshit yourself as to why you wannna change. Whatever the reason
(except because some Jap made it) change if you want to so long as it
doesn't take dinner off your table.
"sakman"
|
320.12 | If it ain't broke... | GOES11::G_HOUSE | I think I'm gonna hurl! -G. Bush | Fri Jan 10 1992 12:15 | 13 |
| I don't know about the "reissue" series instruments, but I played a
Japanese made Standard Strat awhile back and it definately did not have
good sounding pickups in it. They didn't have very much output and the
tone was kind of squeeky and generally poor. I'd have had 'em out of
the thing in a heartbeat.
If it sounds good to you, why change? If not, fix it!
I kind of like the Lace-Sensors for a vintage kind of tone without all
the hum.
Greg
|
320.13 | SD replacements are good | LEDS::BURATI | Mind the cat | Fri Jan 10 1992 12:54 | 5 |
|
I have a Seymor Duncan '54 Vintage Tele (I think) replacement bridge
pickup in an old Tele and it is absolutely GREAT sounding. It's the
model with the two center pole pieces raised. The '52 replacement has
all flush pole pieces.
|
320.14 | | HEDRON::DAVE | UNIX is cool... | Fri Jan 10 1992 13:05 | 5 |
| I have a duncan alnico II bridge pickup for a tele. WHen I had a tele it sounded
pretty good, real crunchy low end and a nice strong output. Since I don't
have a tele for the pickup anymore you interested?
dbii
|
320.15 | Tele wiring diagram needed | SAHQ::ROSENKRANZ | Less is More | Mon Aug 10 1992 11:38 | 18 |
| I'm thinking about popping some Joe Barden pickups in my tele. Its
been recommended that, in doing so, that I also replace the volume
pot (with a 500k) and the TBX with a standard tone control.
It occurred to me that as long as I have to replace this stuff, I might as
well get a replacement pickup switch as well and then wire it all up
and do a wholesale replacement of everything. This way if I want to
go back to the old set-up, I pop ALL the new wiring out and pop all
the old wiring in. I guess the jack would be the only exception. That
way I do a minimum of soldering work when switching.
Anyway, does anyone have a wiring schematic for a traditional Tele
setup. i.e. Two pickups, volume, standard tone control? Are there
any capacitors that need to be in there??
any help appreciated,
jim
|
320.16 | Blue Lace | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Ripablikans fore Kwael | Mon Sep 14 1992 10:30 | 24 |
| I've mentioned several times in this notesile about not being
particularly fond of Fender Lace Sensors; this was based primarly
on experiences with the Gold Lace Sensors for Strat. Looks like
I'll have to modify my position.
My buddy just picked up a new American Standard Tele. After a few
days he was kind of disappointed in the sound and his tech recommend
a set of Blue Tele Lace Sensors. I tried the axe this weekend and
these pickups sound great. Blue Lace Sensors are described in the
lit as a "classic humbucker" sound, so I guess I was expecting them
to muddy the sound a bit. Not true! I tried this axe side by side
with a stock '68 Tele; the Blue Laces had all the razor sharp high
end of originals, but with greater depth and a little more kick.
They sounded like the '68, only better. The added kick isn't
overpowering, but just enough to really make it sing with distortion.
These pickups just seem to magnify all the things you like about a
Tele in the first place.
Note that the bridge pickup has a flat black cover and the neck has
the traditional chrome, so you can slip these in with minimal cosmetic
impact to your classic Tele look. I recommend anyone looking to
improve their Tele pickups to check these out.
/rick
|
320.17 | Joe Barden | SAHQ::ROSENKRANZ | Less is More | Mon Sep 14 1992 11:20 | 11 |
| Another interesting possibility for Tele pickups are Joe Barden PUs.
They are double coil (they don't like the word humbucking) so are
quiet and have a hotter signal than standard tele pickups.
Rumor has it that the current owner of Roy Buchannan's axe did a
side by side comparison with the Barden's and was hard pressed to
declare a winner.
I've not yet test driven these myself, but they are the PU of choice
of Danny Gatton and they may be heard on any of his more recent
recordings.
|
320.18 | and how much? | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Mon Sep 14 1992 11:44 | 5 |
| Anybody seen a dealer selling Joe Barden Pickups in NH,Mass
area?
Rick
|
320.19 | buy direct | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Ripablikans fore Kwael | Mon Sep 14 1992 12:07 | 2 |
| Recent Guitar Player mags have had an ad from Joe Barden himself in
the classified section.
|
320.20 | | HEDRON::DAVEB | Life is | Mon Sep 14 1992 13:31 | 8 |
| Capital City Music in Augusta has been ordering them for the SRV strat bigots.
(207) 622-6522
Tell Al I sent ya and he'll charge you double :-)
dbii
|
320.21 | | LEDS::BURATI | or maybe just a change of climate | Tue Sep 15 1992 12:35 | 4 |
| SRV strat bigots.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
???
|
320.22 | The lowdown on the SRV strat bigots | CARTUN::BDONOVAN | | Tue Sep 15 1992 13:16 | 41 |
| re: .20
.21
SRV strat bigots
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I didn't the think the word had gotten out on these guys, but alas,
apparently it has.
The SRV strat bigots are a radical fringe group of guitar players.
Origins of the group have been traced to a trailer camp just northwest
of Bangor, Maine, but members have been seen in bars, music stores,
and monster truck jamborees all over the U.S.
An SRV strat bigot is easily detected by his flat, broad-rimmed,
Spanish-style cowboy had. He is usually carrying a guitar, and from
time to time, he will wear a poncho-style Indian blanket. Original
SRV strat bigots only played sunburst Fenders, but the purity of the
organization has been somewhat diluted as more members join, and
the SRV letters have been seen all makes and models of guitar.
Some members claim that the larger the SRV letters are, the more potent
the man. Senior members like to point out the fallacy of this claim
by recalling that David Cassidy once played a Stratocaster.
SRV strat bigots have targeted the weaker-selling Telecaster model as
their natural enemy, and they frequently torment Telecaster owners.
In one particularly vile incident, a Telecaster was dunked in road
tar, covered with feathers, and then ridden out of town on a UPS
truck that was leaving anyway.
Secret shops in the basements of SRV strat bigots sell illegal
merchandise such Danny Gatton posters with a bullseye painted in
his forehead, Roy Buchanan Memorial keychains, and specially-brewed
"Hendrix Stratocaster Starter for Telecasters" lighter fluid in both
regular and Monterey scents.
Occasionally, an unfortunate hiker or camper will stumble on the
group deep in mid-ritual in the woods. The SRV strat bigots worship
their fallen hero, and also take time to honor the other fallen Texas
strat hero, St. Buddy of Holly.
|
320.23 | or whatever we're claiming he used this month | GOOROO::CLARK | Third Stone From the Sun | Tue Sep 15 1992 13:32 | 3 |
| re .-1
do they all use .013 high 'E' strings too?
|
320.24 | smells like SRV | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Buckethead for president | Tue Sep 15 1992 14:23 | 7 |
| I think there was a thing in Rolling Stone on these guys recently. It
appears a particularly militant strain of the organization has sprung
up in the Pacific Northwest, where heaps of burned up Fender Mustangs
have been found smouldering along deserted stretches of highway on
moonlit nights. It's rumored that Kurdt Kobain's recent appearance
on the MTV Music Awards with a Strat was an attempt to appease local
bigots and put an end to threats he's been getting.
|
320.25 | True? | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Subvert the dominant paradigm. | Tue Sep 15 1992 15:00 | 5 |
| I heard Stevie Ray was seen at a shopping mall near here recently, and
the USPS has confirmed that they are planning a postage stamp in his
honor.
Dave
|
320.26 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | All over but the shouting | Tue Sep 15 1992 15:13 | 1 |
| Is that gonna be the "young SRV" or the "older SRV" on the stamp?
|
320.27 | | BTOVT::BEST_G | disk 3 of 2 | Tue Sep 15 1992 16:39 | 6 |
|
Yeah...like before or after his gut peeked out from under the
poncho?
guy
|
320.28 | | HEDRON::DAVEB | Life is | Wed Sep 16 1992 10:54 | 6 |
| According to local ledgend Joe Barden pickups were in all SRV's guitars. So
all the local bluesmongers immediatly ordered pickups for their strats. And
yes some of these guys really use .013's (like GreeVeeKing).
dbii
|
320.29 | Red and Blue Lace | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Mon Mar 28 1994 08:47 | 11 |
| I also own a Tele with some real great pickups. "I usually blame
the feedback on the mic". I read through this file and made a
few phone calls to get the up-to-date info on prices and such.
I wanted Seymour Duncan or Lace and settled on Lace when I found
them to be about one half the price of the Duncans. There were
a couple of deals. The Texas Specal set of pickups were $99. a
set and similar to blue lace. I ordered a red lace for the bridge
and blue for the neck at $126. for the set. I should get them in
a week. I'll update you on the sound after I install them.
Mark
|
320.30 | James Burton Tele w/3 Different Fender Lace Sensors | ABACUS::PAGE | | Mon Mar 28 1994 14:20 | 19 |
|
I have a James Burton Signature Telecaster, which came stock with
a Blue Lace Sensor as the neck pickup, a Gold Lace Sensor in the middle,
and a Red Lace Sensor in the bridge position. It's really set up like a
Strat with a Tele body.
They are pretty nice pickups, but it doesn't sound anything like a
Tele. It doesn't sound much like a Strat, either. It's kind of a unique
sound. I find the Blue Lace neck pickup a bit too boomy for some things.
The Red Lace in the bridge is real bright & crunchy. I use this guitar
in the bridge position to record most of my "metal", screamin'-lead-type
stuff. Kinda seems weird playing that kind of stuff on a Tele but that
Red Lace sensor is better suited for that sound than any of my other
more traditional Strat & Tele guitars.
Brad
|
320.31 | WoW! A 3 Pickup Tele | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Wed Mar 30 1994 08:14 | 7 |
| I've never seen a Tele with three pickups. Is the middle PU set into
the plastic and are the PU shapes the same as a two PU Tele?
The sound you described is exactly the sound I was looking for. I'm
Psyched. I feels like I'm getting a new guitar.
Mark
|
320.32 | | ABACUS::PAGE | | Wed Mar 30 1994 11:52 | 18 |
|
The James Burton Signature Tele has no plastic pickguard/faceplate;
there are just 3 cavities routed out, just big enough to sit one
pickup in each.
The byproduct of this is that it leaves a larger than normal area
on the Tele body that can be painted. The James Burton models take
advantage of this with a nice gold or red paisley design over a black
finish. Pretty sharp. In truth, this was what sold me on this guitar.
I confess-- not the sound, not the craftsmanship... it was the way-cool
paisley finish!
It weighs a ton, though. I'd say it's as heavy as a Les Paul, maybe
heavier....
Brad
|
320.33 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Wed Mar 30 1994 12:37 | 8 |
| re: .32
> It weighs a ton, though. I'd say it's as heavy as a Les Paul, maybe
> heavier....
But does it weigh as much as a Twin? :-)
-Hal
|
320.34 | But my amp only goes to 10 ;-) | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | db | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:29 | 11 |
| > -< WoW! A 3 Pickup Tele >-
> I've never seen a Tele with three pickups. Is the middle PU set into
> the plastic and are the PU shapes the same as a two PU Tele?
I own a Tele with 4 pickups!!!
It's a Steve Morse signature model (made by Ernie Ball).
Steve Morse's actually has 5 pickups!!!! The extra pickup on his is
for a MIDI interface.
|
320.35 | | LEDS::BURATI | BE AFRAID! BE AFRAID! | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:46 | 8 |
| > Steve Morse's actually has 5 pickups!!!! The extra pickup on his is
> for a MIDI interface.
Since Morse's 5 pickup Tele pre-dates MIDI, I wonder, did he use it as a
dedicated signal source for that 360 Systems rig he used?
--Ron
|
320.36 | | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | db | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:02 | 14 |
| >Since Morse's 5 pickup Tele pre-dates MIDI, I wonder, did he use it as
>a dedicated signal source for that 360 Systems rig he used?
Well... yeah. I think the 360 did have a special pickup.
Of course the particular guitar you're thinking of, which Morse calls
"Frankenstein", has been retired for many years now. Basically, the
fretboard had been filed to the point where it couldn't be done
anymore without replacing the neck.
Morse now uses Ernie Ball models and has used a number of different
MIDI systems.
db
|
320.37 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:34 | 5 |
| > Morse now uses Ernie Ball models and has used a number of different
> MIDI systems.
what's that thing he uses in his videos that looks like a strap on TV
remote control?
|
320.38 | It's an Aphex Emotion Enhancer Mike ;-) | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | db | Thu Mar 31 1994 10:50 | 8 |
| > what's that thing he uses in his videos that looks like a strap on
> TV remote control?
I don't know, but I bet if Coop saw it, he'd want one. ;-)
It's some sort of control for a guitar-to-MIDI interface, but it's
not any of the well known brands. I believe it's made by some obscure
German company and I don't remember the name.
|
320.39 | | KDX200::COOPER | There's a moon in the sky! | Thu Mar 31 1994 12:18 | 5 |
| It's just a midi controller for his synths and rack. I've got
lots of controllers...
:-)
|
320.40 | must be why they call him "Sphincter Boy"! | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:23 | 1 |
| > -< It's an Aphex Emotion Enhancer Mike ;-) >-
|
320.41 | Mex tele Vs. Am tele | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Wed Apr 06 1994 11:50 | 12 |
| I got my Lace Sensors and installed them into my Tele last night.
Only one(the bridge) worked, but I think it's the sel switch wiring
that is causing the problem. When the toggle is in the bridge position
the bridge pickup works. In the middle and neck position I get
nothing. The wiring diagram that came with the sensor is for an
american standard tele and I have an unamerican mexican tele and yes
they are different. I called Fender and they didn't know what the
pinout for the switch on the Am tele is as his diagram is a picture.
It looks like I have to rewire the switch. Has anyonw had this problemo?
Mark
|
320.42 | Update to .41 | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Fri Apr 08 1994 07:39 | 6 |
| I took everything apart and metered out the sensors and found that the
neck sensor had a shorted winding. I called the music center I bought
them from and they're sending me a new sensor. I'm getting another
red sensor for the neck as the bridge sensor sounds so good.
Mark
|
320.43 | %^) | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Good rhythms to bad rubbish | Fri Apr 08 1994 13:48 | 5 |
| re: red sensor for the neck
Is this some kind of redneck pickup?
Bubba
|
320.44 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Fri Apr 08 1994 17:39 | 1 |
| It just senses them.
|
320.45 | update to .41 | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Thu Apr 21 1994 09:58 | 7 |
| I called to see why I haven't received the red lace sensor for the
neck and was told that the red lace is not available for the neck
position.
Does anyone have a tele with red lace sensors in the neck position?
Mark
|
320.46 | recommendations from "the street" | RICKS::CALCAGNI | I Got You Babe (Slight Return) | Thu Apr 21 1994 11:02 | 36 |
| Being the vintage kinda guy I am, I try to keep my finger on the pulse
of this stuff. I recently asked some of the Boston area players that
hang down at Cambridge Music about recommendations for Tele pickups;
here's what they told me.
Best thing short of an original 50's pickup are "early" Bardens;
however, the Bardens they are currently manufacturing now are
supposedly not as good. You recognize early Bardens by the wires;
two thin leads. They later went to two thicker leads, and currently
four conductors. The thin lead jobs have the voodoo.
Next down the list are either Van Zandts or Fralin's; about the same
both in price performance. I've actually played several sets of Van Zandts
down in various Teles (both old and new) and they are great. Lotsa
twang AND bottom. I think these run somewhere around $80 - $100 per
pickup (but don't quote me on that).
Finally, third tier is either current Bardens or G&L Classics. The G&L
Tele has been getting rave reviews all over the place, so I'd expect
these to be pretty good. Actually, I've tried one and they are nice.
A little less big in the bottom than the Van Zandts I thought, but then
that could have been different guitars too. Note these are NOT the
big, soapbar-like pickups on the lower end ASATS; they are the direct
replacement Tele pickups found only on the ASAT Classic. The bridge
PU even has the cool vintage-style string winding over the coil. The
current Bardens are supposedly similar, but note that they cost twice
as much as the G&Ls. However, you do get the advantage of
hum-cancelling.
Note that according to the "experts", these are all very acceptable
Tele replacements and will all deliver that vintage Tele vibe in
buckets. The choice comes in how anal you are about vintage tone and
how much you're willing to spend.
/leo
|
320.47 | And it made a strange lump in my pants... | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Thu Apr 21 1994 11:42 | 6 |
| > The choice comes in how anal you are about vintage tone and how much
> you're willing to spend.
I tried putting a Tele pickup on my butt once, did nothing for me.
gh
|
320.48 | | LEDS::BURATI | cluck? | Thu Apr 21 1994 11:46 | 1 |
| I hope you didn't put it back on the shelf.
|
320.49 | | SAHQ::ROSENKRANZ | Go ask Alice.... | Thu Apr 21 1994 11:49 | 7 |
| I can vouch for the Bardens as I have them in two teles. I don't know
if i've got the old ones or the new ones, but they will wake up your
tele for sure. They are quiet. The bridge gives that familiar tele
twang. I was surprised by the neck pickup. It gives a pretty intense
tone.
jim
|
320.50 | going downhill... fast | RICKS::CALCAGNI | I Got You Babe (Slight Return) | Thu Apr 21 1994 12:17 | 3 |
| >> I tried putting a Tele pickup on my butt once, did nothing for me.
Was it still in the guitar at the time?
|
320.51 | cluck | RICKS::CALCAGNI | The animal trainer and the toad | Wed Jan 18 1995 09:47 | 36 |
| Just replaced the bridge pickup in my Tele with a Duncan Antiquity.
If you haven't seen the hype, these are "pre-aged" vintage
replacements; new, hand-wound jobbers that are dirtied and beaten up
by Seymour and his gang to save you years of sweating in bars :-)
Of course this sounds like a silly gimmick, but supposedly Seymour has
also gone to great lengths to recreate original materials and construction
techniques and done special things to age the magnets and scatterwind
the coils, all in an attempt to create something that captures the magic
of the originals.
Inside the box, the pickup came housed in a little burlap sack.
There's a tag attached with a stamped serial number (and some more of
the hype) and a handwritten DC resistance value. Mine was 7.02k,
actually at the low end of the range for real early 50's Teles.
The pickup itself sure does look old; it was filthy. The polepieces
were all tarnished, the wax around the coils was caked with dirt, and
even what looked like some beer stains! I could've lived without all
this baloney, but what I was really interested in was tone and this
baby delivered.
I knew it after playing three notes; this pickup has the stuff. It
does everything; sparkle on top, big and round on the bottom. Buchanan
clicks and squawks? Gibbons-like harmonic squeals? No sweat. It
purrs when you play soft, snarls back when you dig in, almost seems to
talk under your control. It has the tone and *touch* of a great old Tele
pickup. In fact, this is the only re-issue pickup of any type I've ever
found that really captured all the magic of a real original.
So despite the gimmicks, I think Seymour has done something here. If
you're looking for true old Tele vibe, this is the best thing I've come
across. It may be the best Tele pickup I've played, new or old.
And ya know I have admit, that aging business actually looks pretty
good in an old Tele too, like it belongs there.
/soul_man
|
320.52 | Next it'll be pre-aged guitar strings... | VARESE::SACHA::IDC_CASE | | Thu Jan 19 1995 03:25 | 7 |
| So how much did you have to shell out, Rick?
I agree, it does sound like a bit of a gimmick, but the vintage Tele
sound is *the* sound as far as I'm concerned. What model Telecaster
have you got, by the way?
Dom
|
320.53 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | The animal trainer and the toad | Thu Jan 19 1995 07:23 | 15 |
| The pickup cost me $82; for comparison, the same dealer was selling the
normal Duncan Vintage Broadcaster pickup for $40.
Btw, my previous note may have been a bit misleading in that the
pickup is technically a "Broadcaster" pickup, meaning that it has
flat pole pieces. This is the style pickup used on the Broadcasters
and earliest Teles. Around 1954 (I think), the Tele bridge was changed
to staggered pole pieces, like on the early Strats. I don't think
Duncan makes an Antiquity series Tele bridge with the staggered magnets.
I just have a plain vanilla post-CBS Tele, nothing unusual or vintage.
I never liked the stock pickups, but with the new Duncan it's like a
different guitar.
/rick
|
320.54 | caveat | RICKS::CALCAGNI | The animal trainer and the toad | Tue Jan 24 1995 09:39 | 17 |
| More news re the Antiquity. Talked to someone else who installed one
of these and claimed his was somewhat microphonic; the symptom was
feedback problems at high volume. I found this to be true with mine
as well. In keeping with the "vintage" spirit these pickups are NOT
potted, just like the originals. This may have something to do with
how good they sound, unfortunately.
Bottom line, it seems to be a double edged sword. These pickups sound
great but could be tricky to use in gig situations. But one thing to
consider; Roy Buchanan, Albert Lee, and countless other Tele masters
have made do with their original microphonic pickups quite successfully.
And all those $50k Les Paul 'bursts don't have potted pickups either.
Anyway, something to consider if you're thinking about these.
/loraina_bobbin
|
320.55 | saddle pickups | AIMTEC::JOHNSON_R | | Wed Mar 20 1996 12:50 | 12 |
| from another string...
>transducer built into the bridge for acoustic tone,
I saw something like this in the last MF catalog on a shovel Tele
model. It had individual pickups for each saddle.
Has any one tried something like this and if yes how was the acoustic
sound?
thanks,
Robert Johnson
|
320.56 | | NOKNOK::ABATELLI | In Pipeline Heaven | Thu Mar 21 1996 13:57 | 15 |
| RE: -.1 saddle p/u's
I saw one... played one... and it didn't sound completely
acoustic to me at all. BTW, this setup was on a Chet Atkins
model Gibson. I guess I expected more than what I actually
heard.
Would I buy one?
No, but that's my opinion.
Rock on,
Fred
|
320.57 | | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Fri Mar 22 1996 10:44 | 3 |
| Hey Rob!!! Is that your REAL name????
-k
|
320.58 | are you ready | AIMTEC::JOHNSON_R | | Fri Mar 22 1996 11:36 | 7 |
| actually its.....
"Robert Eric Johnson"
but cant play worth a $........
later
|
320.59 | | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Fri Mar 22 1996 12:46 | 3 |
| Far out.....
|
320.60 | Antiquity II - back to the 60s... | VARESE::TRNUX1::IDC_BSTR | | Fri Jan 31 1997 09:34 | 31 |
| Two years on from Rick's informative comments about the Antiquity
pickups, and I've heard that Seymour Duncan is about to put out a new
series of Antiquity pickups (it's possible that they're already on the
market in the U.S.).
The new range will be called Antiquity II, and is designed to provide
the so-called "British Invasion" sound (where the Antiquity I pickups
were built to provide a vintage 50s sound). There will be pickups for
Strat, Tele, Jaguar, etc. models. No idea of the price, but I'm told
that production will be limited (I believe this was the case with
Antiquity I?).
All in all, I'm quite attracted by these pickups, especially after
Rick's positive review of the Antiquity I Telecaster pickup. I
currently play a non-vintage Tele through a '65 AC30, and while I'm
satisfied with the sound, I still think there's room for improvement.
My band play 60s beat/R&B in a decidedly retro style, and a while back,
I toyed with the idea of getting an Epiphone Casino (shades of
Harrison/Lennon...Rickenbackers are out of my price range!). But then
I reasoned that in terms of playability I wouldn't swap the Tele for
anything.
I guess it's the usual story: Teles have superb necks, but how many
people don't at least dabble with the idea of changing the stock
pickups?! Hence my interest in the Antiquity line...
Dom
P.S. Anyone know if the Antiquity I pickups are still in production?
|
320.61 | Dazed and Confused | RICKS::CALCAGNI | thick slabs of dirt in a halo of airy twang | Fri Jan 31 1997 14:08 | 5 |
| This is the first I've heard about it, but my guess is they're just doing
an Antiquity with staggered poles.
Food for thought: most of Led Zep I was cut with a 60's Tele
|
320.62 | Tele-vision... | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Mon Feb 03 1997 03:01 | 3 |
| ...So was Jimi's Purple Haze...
-kev-
|
320.63 | Price guidelines for Antiquity pickups... | VARESE::TRNUX1::IDC_BSTR | | Tue Apr 29 1997 09:23 | 23 |
| Well, time moves on and I keep hearing wonderful reports about these
Seymour Duncan Antiquity pickups; thumbs up in every product review that
I've read. I wonder if any of you good people across the pond could give me
some info regarding the prices of these pickups in the U.S?
To be a bit more precise, I'd like to change the bridge pickup in my
Telecaster. A rough idea of the price in both the Antiquity I and
Antiquity II ranges would be great.
Here in Italy, I've only managed to find these pickups in a couple of
shops (both had very limited stock too) and the price I was quoted was
too high for my liking. My brother-in-law checked them out in a couple
of shops in London's infamous Denmark Street...and was quoted equally
high prices (�119 for Antiquity I and �142 for Antiquity II). The
London shops had plenty of them in stock, but the lire is so weak against
the pound at the moment that it practically rules out buying from the UK.
Surely SD prices in the U.S are a little lower...
Many thanks,
Dom
P.S. Needless to say, I'm interested in the retail price to the public
- not the list price.
|
320.64 | $110.00 a set | ALFSS2::JOHNSON_ROB | | Mon May 05 1997 17:12 | 5 |
| Got a price of $110.00 for a set, in Atlanta GA.
later, rj
|
320.65 | At that price, I think I'll start importing them ;-) | VARESE::TRNUX1::IDC_BSTR | | Tue May 13 1997 06:22 | 13 |
| >Got a price of $110.00 for a set, in Atlanta GA.
Thanks, Rob. Hey, that's an astonishing price, assuming that you're
talking about both the neck and bridge pickups (by European standards,
it wouldn't be a *bad* price just for one or the other!).
Was this set Antiquity I or II? From what I've heard, the price difference
should be in the region of about 20%. Also, is $110 fairly typical of
current U.S. prices?
Thanks,
Dom
|