T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
187.1 | Tension | EMERLD::DUBE | | Fri Mar 06 1987 12:51 | 8 |
| It's supposed to reduce tension on the neck.
However, I think a lot of the tonal quality of the guitar is lost
when it is tuned down to D. I have used a regular E tuning on my
12 string for four years, and the neck is still straight as an arrow.
-Dan
|
187.2 | | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Fri Mar 06 1987 22:22 | 8 |
| It depends somewhat on the guitar. Early 12-strings, like the
one played by Huddie Ledbetter (Leadbelly), who popularized the
instrument, needed to be tuned four or more frets low. In the
past I've had my Martin at full tension, but generally keep it
at one tone down because I found the octave G (the thinnest string)
had a tendency to break at full tension; I also like the ability
to get a lower tone by playing without a capo.
|
187.3 | Guild 12 string | ELROY::VINCIULLA | | Sun Mar 08 1987 10:08 | 9 |
| Hello,
I was just over Macduff's Music in White City (Shrewsbury),
looking over their guitars. Started talking to him about how they
tune a 12 string. A Guild 12 string was for sale which caught my
eye. The salesman told me that this Guild (d12-25) has *two* truss
rods in the neck. This makes standard tuning no problem (e-a-d-g-b-e).
Marc
|
187.4 | Also comes in handy as a pry bar... | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Sun Mar 08 1987 21:05 | 1 |
|
|
187.5 | | LYMPH::LAMBERT | Spring Hopes Eternal | Mon Mar 09 1987 10:15 | 4 |
| 2 rods are great for the neck, but you can still pull the bridge up,
or warp the top...
-- Sam
|
187.6 | heavy-duty all-around? | ELROY::VINCIULLA | | Mon Mar 09 1987 12:00 | 6 |
| GREETINGS ,
I assume if Guild strengthens the neck that they
would also do the same for the bridge and top, but you never know...
marc
|
187.7 | Heavvvy, man... | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Mar 09 1987 15:59 | 5 |
| Guilds are pretty sturdy. If you heft a Guild and a comparable
Martin, the Guild outweighs it by a noticable margin. The style of
bracing under the soundboard has a considerable influence on the
tone of the instrument, which probably accounts for the difference
(no value judgements!) in tonal quality between different guitars.
|
187.8 | Tune it right!!!! | CASV07::BGOSS | | Tue Mar 10 1987 12:41 | 21 |
|
I own a guild twelve string and would never tune it up to an
E. A twelve string is not the same instrument as a six string, there
for the tuning is different. The pressure from six extra strings
is suppose to be an unbelieveable strain on the bridge. I don't
suppose it would matter if you tuned it up for a day,but why take
the chance. I have seen a twelve string yamaha in a music shop that
had bowed out the wood. The bridge held fine but it actually pulls
the wooden body right up.
I'm not saying people don't do it, I'm just saying I wouldn't
cause I have seen. Some people just don't care ya know? buy another
one when this one breaks... If you can do this then fine.
Your car will probably run fine on 2 quarts of oil even if your
suppose to have five in it.... I put in the five just in case...
Maybe not a good example but you get the point!!!!!
Later,
B.G.
|
187.9 | String 'em up! | 18889::KELLYJ | | Mon Mar 16 1987 16:36 | 7 |
| Trying to preserve the instrument by lowering the tuning pitch probably
works, but I think you lose so much brilliance that it's not worth
it.
Regards,
Johnny Jupiter
|
187.10 | my body's bowed up! | SPYDER::BRIGGS | Richard Briggs | Tue Mar 17 1987 09:05 | 10 |
| The reason for my question is that I have nearly always tuned my
12 year old Ibanez to E (because it sounds better as was said
previously). However, I have taken to tuning it down now because
the bridge has started to bow the body up thus raising the overall
action. I invariably use a capo on the second fret to bring it back
up to E.
Richar Briggs
UK SWAS
|
187.11 | | HAMSTR::PELKEY | on information overload | Tue Mar 17 1987 11:11 | 4 |
| Hmm,, I haven't read all replies, but I always thought the
theory behind down tuning was to take the tension of the
tail peice ????????????? Thoughts ?
|
187.12 | I play for PAIN! | CIMNET::JNELSON | My interest level's dropping.... | Mon Nov 23 1987 11:09 | 18 |
| Take the tension of the tailpiece? Please explain yourself...
Sorry, I guess I'm a few seasons late.
I own an Ibanez Artist 12-String, and usually play it ebgdae. However,
I've been complaining to myself forever about the action. It seems
that no one has mentioned this so far, I thought it was the main
reason for tuning down! At standard tuning, I often find it difficult,
if not impossible (especially if I haven't played 12 in a while),
to play for more than 10 minutes without cringing in pain due to
the extra amount of pressure the hand must apply to get crisp sounds.
I've adjusted the rod many times, but as soon as I string it up,
there's the same old problem again. Maybe all those years of tight
storage have actually damaged the neck, I dunno. Anybody else have
this problem?
Jon
|
187.13 | | PARSEC::MELENDEZ | | Mon Nov 23 1987 12:31 | 12 |
| It has been said that 12 strings, tune to A 440, puts so much
tension on the tailpiece that it will, in time, break it. It has
also been said that Yamaha are known for having this problem.
I have a Yamaha which I tune to A 440, and I have not had this
problem. The guitar is about 11 years old. I used xtra light strings
and I do put the tension down when I am going to be playing for
a while.
I did adjust the action to this guitar and it made a world of
difference.
|
187.14 | Tune down, capo up... | TARKIN::TTESTA | Tommy B. Goode...like to B. Better! | Mon Nov 23 1987 12:51 | 6 |
| Also try tuning down a half step and putting a capo on the first
fret...(which makes A=440 again, but your action will be slightly
lower, and easier to play.) when you are done remove the capo for
storage at a lessened tension.
Tom T.
|
187.16 | Huh??? | SMURF::BENNETT | | Fri Jan 11 1991 13:55 | 4 |
|
I thought the A string on a guitar was more like 110.00Hz.....
That's 2 octaves below "reference"
|
187.17 | don't bother | RANGER::WEBER | | Fri Jan 11 1991 15:29 | 12 |
| Divide the numbers shown in .15 by 4 and you'll be closer to the truth.
A freq counter is a poor way to tune an instrument. It is too
sensitive to small irregularities like beats and overtones, so it can
be frustrating to use. Electronic tuners are designed to average these
variations out and smooth the display. Additionally, counters tend to
be inaccurate at the low frequencies involved, unless you use period
measurement, or a long time base.
A $60 tuner is a better way to do it.
DannY W.
|
187.18 | Corrected version...sorry for the Octave error! | BTOVT::BRONSON | Mr. Rogers is a metal head! | Sat Jan 12 1991 11:03 | 31 |
|
Thanks to .16/.17 for picking up my mistake.....as noted in those replies
the counter should be capable of measuring the period/or period
averaging.When I copied the hz scale I shifted a few octaves the first
time around.
Just in case you have a Freq counter to measure the oscillation rate
of the strings...here are the open frequencies of each string of a 6/12
string guitar.
6 string 12 string
E = 82.407 hz E = 82.407 hz ,E har = 164.81 hz
A = 110.00 hz A = 110.00 hz ,A har = 220.00 hz
D = 146.83 hz D = 146.83 hz ,D har = 293.66 hz
G = 196.00 hz G = 196.00 hz ,G har = 392.00 hz
B = 246.94 hz B = 246.94 hz both strings
E = 329.63 hz E = 329.63 hz both strings
Hope this helps....
R.B.
|