T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
171.1 | | STOWMA::LANGE | | Tue Feb 18 1986 16:08 | 7 |
| Tubes heavier!!!you got that right.
I have a SVT head. 80+lbs.sounds good.(tube)
Then there's a Marshall 200wt power amp,and an Ashly preamp I'm
scoping out. Also sounds really good.(solid state)and weighs about
50 lbs less.and is rack mountable+++
Jeff_also_a_bass_player_and_wants_a_compact_unit
|
171.2 | Boogie tube bass amp | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Sun Feb 23 1986 13:22 | 8 |
|
However MESA engineering claims that their tube bass amp has
more dynamic range than ANY solid state unit - even with twice
the RMS power. I dont know why they can make this claim...
Anyone else know??
Joe Jas
|
171.3 | I LOVE my Peavey (and my PV too!) | HAVOC::MOSS | | Mon Feb 24 1986 08:41 | 20 |
| I have got a Peavy MegaBass amp which is solid state. It's the best
amp I could (not!) afford when I was looking around. As far as tonal
quality is concerned, I seem to be able to get any sound I want,
so long as I can imagine the sound (so far) it seems to be in there
somewhere - the only problem is finding it. It doesn't weigh much
at all (the cab makes up for that tho), it's very compact, rack
mountable, got an n-band eq, chorus and crossover built in. I think
it is a very good amp, for me at least. Maybe it just suits my
particular bass very well, don't know. I love it.
There again, I haven't played for donkey's years, I
only listened to half a dozen or so alternatives, and in any case,
I probably wouldn't know a good bass amp if it stood up and bit
me. Last time I was playing regularly, 10+ years ago, I had an
H & H solid state head which, back then, I thought was a pretty
good amp for the money (don't ask, I can't remember - must have
been pretty cheap tho').
I'm very happy with mine anyway - but I wouldn't take anything I
say seriously, I don't know my a** from my elbow when it comes to
things like this.
Charles.
|
171.4 | What does rack mountable mean? | CHAPLN::LAMBERT | Drowning man, seeking anchor | Mon Feb 24 1986 11:17 | 17 |
| re. -1
gee charles, in this world of ours where everything is relative, and
wishy-washy nerds like ziggy become national heros - it's really good
to hear from a man who really has the courage of his convictions and
isn't afraid to stand up and speak out for what he believes in...
i think...
8^)) 8^)) 8^)) 8^)) 8^)) 8^)) 8^)) 8^)) 8^)) 8^)) 8^)) 8^))
but seriously,
when you (or anyone else) say your amp is rack mountable, does that mean that
it conforms to some ANSI size standard?
-max-
|
171.5 | That old tube controversy again? | AQUA::ROST | | Tue Mar 10 1987 10:18 | 34 |
| Just thought I'd throw in my two cents worth at this late date on
the tube vs. transistor debate. For bass, the story is alot different
than for guitar. On guitar, there is no doubt that tubes provide
superior distortion characteristics although there are some solid-state
units which do sound awfully good.
With bass, the main difference is in DAMPING, that is how soon the
speaker cone stops moving after the input stops and HEADROOM or
how the amp will respond to an overload.
Damping on tube amps tends to be poor, giving a muddy bottom end
which some players like. Listen to older (60's) type players and
you can hear what I mean. Modern styles prefer clean crisp bottom,
which solid state definitely can deliver. Yes, the speaker cab
does get into the picture which is why an Acoustic 360 sounds muddy
despite being transistors. The muddy bottom can give the ILLUSION
of more bottom end.
The headroom question is one of how do you like your overdrive?
On solid-state amops, as s oon as you overload the amp, it starts
to give a raspy sound unless the amp uses FETs in the circuitry.
Tubes will also overdrive, but smoothly in a way that sounds OK.
This is why most bass rigs sold today have compressors and limiters.
Anyone who has used a Peavey where an LED tells you when clipping
is being prevented may be suprised to see how often the peak light
comes on! If the limiter was not there, that peak would distort.
The result is that since tubes provide a "soft" distortion, they
can be allowed to overdrive on peaks, providing more heradroom,
i.e. they play louder. For example , I use a Traynor TS120B which
is 140 watts, solid state and a Bassman which is 50 watts, tube.
The Fender sounds just as loud although it tends to be muddier on the
bottom which is great for blues or reggae but not for funk. Hope that
clears it up for you.
|
171.6 | SSL is the way to go! | ERASER::BUCKLEY | Screaming in Digital | Tue Mar 10 1987 16:11 | 4 |
| Re -.1: I'll argue that some solid state units have `superier'
distortion characteristics.
WJB
|
171.7 | HAVE BOTH-WILL TRAVEL! | HAMER::KRON | | Mon Jul 17 1989 13:38 | 5 |
| GUESS WHAT?????!!!---CHICKEN-BUTT!!!; no but seriously, now you
can have both; at the same time and it's footswitchable. just tried
a Blue Tube today-and it sounds G-RRReat!!! -140$ and stomp box
size,A.C powered. Definitely getting one!
-Bill Kron/Peavey Devotee(but open minded!!)
|
171.8 | Where? | AQUA::ROST | It's the beat, the beat, the beat | Mon Jul 17 1989 15:21 | 6 |
|
Curious as to where you found the Blue Tube in stock. I've been
interested in checking one out. Did they have the rack version
as well?
Brian
|
171.9 | <<<THE ROGUE"S GALLERY_OF COURSE!!>>> | HAMER::KRON | | Wed Jul 19 1989 11:25 | 6 |
|
Brian, ROGUE MUSIC 30th street in NYC, has all varieties of the
stomp-style unit but no rack-mounted units.....I put a deposit on
the LAST BLUE TUBE yesterday. I also saw them at Sam Ash on 48th
street (guitar heaven up there!!!!) Good luck finding one buddy!!
-Bill (psyched-4-that-sound!)
|
171.10 | BLUE TUBE-THATS THE TICKET! | HAMER::KRON | KA-BOOM | Tue Aug 01 1989 10:30 | 7 |
| After a week of extensive testing........this blue tube gizmo is
fantastic....fattens and warms up the sound much better than a chorus
or any other pedal I've ever used. And you can distort the sound
but still keep the bottom. Sounds very natural and un-effect-like
Definitely strongly recommended to all!
happy-bass!
-Bill
|
171.11 | Bass Questions.. | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Tue Jun 11 1991 20:29 | 20 |
|
I'm still interested in hearing:
A. How you bass dudes get a manageable 4 ohm bass cab put together.
B. How much power would I need if I were to play out in clubs.
I'm using a 50 watt bassman now into an 8 ohm single 15" Gauss
cab, and I'm concerned that the bassman isn't happenin maximum
because it's looking for a 4 ohm load to push, but even if it
was would it be enough power to deliver bass in a club setting.
So... how much power to "gig" out and how to get a compact, easy to
carry bass rig would be my questions. Bill, Bri, Joe, Tom, Rick, Tony,
anybody???
Gree Vee
|
171.12 | Bassman Is Fine With The Right Cabinet | RGB::ROST | Let me in to do the Popcorn! | Wed Jun 12 1991 10:01 | 33 |
| Re: .11
One way to get a 4 ohm cab is have a 4 ohm speaker (duh...). Anyway,
Peavey sells 1-15 cabs that are 4 ohms. You might talk to your friendly
speaker service center about having the voice coil in the Gauss
changed to a 4 ohm coil.
In general, a Bassman will be adequate for small clubs but won't have a
lot of dynamic headroom and will definitely *growl* when you drive it
hard. At volumes above 7 it will start to distort sweetly, if you like
that kind of thing. You really would want a 4 ohm load to get the full
power of the head. I used to use mine with either one of those 4 ohm
Peaveys or a Traynor 8 ohm 1-15 in a C&W band and it was fine. I've
also used with an 8 ohm 1-15 EVM loaded cab in a blues band situation
and that was OK, too although I was getting a reasonable amount of
distortion (OK for blues, but someone who likes a crisp, ringing sound
would have gagged at the tone). I have even tried it with a 1-12 EVM
cab at home and that would be enough for a lot of small gigs, too. With
a larger 4 ohm cab (say 2-15, 4-10, 8-10) it will be loud enough for a
lot of R&R situations, with the same disclaimer about the distortion.
The real question is how efficient are the cabs. Think about a
Marshall stack running two 4-12 cabs. That's only 50 watts, and nobody
complains about not getting enough volume.
As far as compact cabinets go, about the smallest 1-15 you can have
would be the EV-type Thiele aligned cabs. These are *very* efficient.
You can get plans for these free from EV, you can build them yourself
for about $30-40 including all the hardware, stuff in a good 4 ohm
driver and you will have a compact but kick-butt setup using the
Bassman for a head.
Brian
|
171.13 | 4 ohm speakers??? | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Wed Jun 12 1991 10:23 | 19 |
|
No kidding, Brian.. all I've seen (but I've been sheltered) is 8
and 16 ohm speakers. As it turns out I'm going to have my Gauss looked
at this week cos the dust cover is cracked and I could have the dude
take a look at it then. Good idea.. but my (substantial) gut says that
staying with standard 8 ohm speaker cabs would be the way to go. I dew
have an EV12L cab, but I've been leary of wiring it in parallel with my
Gauss.. afraid of damaging it... The EV12L is made for guitar, right?
Wouldn't bass frequencies "blow it's little mind"? If not, Proble
solved.. I'll make up a patch cord that parallels my two cabs and that
will provide the 4 ohms I need to load my Bassman with. Right, Bri,
huh? Right?
BTW.. any new Rost originals out there on tape??
Stevie Grevie (charter member rhyming name club)... heh, go for it,
Buck!! [;^) Buck, Buck, Bo Buck, Bo NANA BANA Bo Buck...
|
171.14 | EVMs and The Quest For The Icepick Tone | RGB::ROST | Let me in to do the Popcorn! | Wed Jun 12 1991 10:45 | 23 |
| The trick with the 12L is tuning the cab so that excursion of the voice
coil is within safe limits. No, you don't have to put a condom on
the thing 8^) 8^) I'm using mine with a 400w head as my bass rig at
the old Hubcaps house gig.
The cab I have is built to EV plans. It can be tuned to either have a
drastic rolloff at about 90 Hz or to have a smooth rolloff at about 160
Hz. At the same (flat) EQ, the smooth rolloff provides less low
end...BUT...crank up the EQ at about 100 Hz, and the thing gets right
on down to 60 Hz, no problem. With the other tuning, the same boost
will just cause the voice coil to bottom out (i.e. try to push the cone
farther than it wants to go) and possibly damage the driver. An open
back cab is essentially untuned and would be even worse to use.
Hope this explanation isn't getting into Mr. Wizard territory too much
8^) 8^)
As far as originals, I got one new one on tape that might get a guffaw
out of you, I've been too busy going to grad school to work on any more
8;( 8;( However, I have discovered how to get the "icepick from hell
stuck right into your forehead" tone onto tape 8^) 8^)
Brian
|
171.15 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Wed Jun 12 1991 12:26 | 7 |
|
Tune the cabs??? Are you kidding... I use open bass cabs... 3/4"
plywood, what ever size the wood's in. I guess I've got a lot to learn
about bass gear, thanks for the free education, Brian... So, in and
open cab, I would definately ummmmm..... violate my EV12L, right?
|
171.16 | $orry to have to tell you thi$ | HAMER::KRON | ELECTRIFIED | Wed Jun 12 1991 14:50 | 2 |
| buy another cabinet for the jobs that require full output.
-Bill(who lost that option when he started usung a 2x18"cab!)
|
171.17 | Remember the Outerspace Band? | PIPPER::KELLYJ | Tone droid | Wed Jun 12 1991 15:55 | 14 |
| Take the bass direct into the PA for added horsepower, using a direct
box. Use the amp for your onstage sound. IMO, 50watts can be loud
enough, but you'll never get the tone and clarity you want, because
a bass transient (like when you pluck the string) asks for huge
amounts of power for a very short time. With a 50watter, the signal
will get clipped at loud volume.
Use a 200 or 300watt head into a separate cabinet. A Thiele enclosure
with an EVM15B would be great (and reasonably portable). I know two
bassists who use 15L's in Thiele boxes with no problem. One plays
in a reggae band (:== *huge* bass sound ).
BTW, tuning the cabinet (re: back a few) is accomplished by adding
a wooden plug to cover part of the port.
|
171.18 | Rockin' Out in Wendell, MA | RGB::ROST | Let me in to do the Popcorn! | Wed Jun 12 1991 16:30 | 10 |
| > <<< Note 171.17 by PIPPER::KELLYJ "Tone droid" >>>
> -< Remember the Outerspace Band? >-
Funny you should say that, I just heard part of their cassette "Initial
Contact" the other night. I was interested in checking it out since
I've known Klondike for a few years but never heard him play.
Back to our regularly scheduled program....
Brian
|
171.19 | I use and EV-15L | WASTED::tomg | Danger: Slow Thinker at Work | Wed Jun 12 1991 17:48 | 7 |
|
FWIW, I use an EV15L (400W version) in a thiele cab. I drive
it with a PVMKVIII head which does about 200W or so into
8 ohms.
It's plenty loud.
|
171.20 | Oh Ayuh... | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Tue Jun 18 1991 20:25 | 22 |
|
Brian, or anyone else who's interested in jumping in.... now I've
go another question... I'm thinking of going with a 2x10 on top of a
1x15 for bass speakers, so I've found a 2x10 cab and it's 4 ohms so I'd
have a
1 1 1
- + - = -
8 4 2.7 ohm cab... ought to make my bassman work it's little butt
right? I've also got this brand new 70 watt Celestion speaker and so
far, I'd never think of playing bass through that, but what if I put it
in one of those acoustic suspension cabs, where the air is giving the
coil something to push on... Would I be able to play bass through it
without damaging it??? Would I have a cooler blues bass sound than the
2x10??? Or.. should I just get the 2x10 ready made cab??? Huh, Bri,
Huh??? [;^)
Gree Vee
|
171.21 | Watch it mixing loads like that | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Carpe diem | Tue Jun 18 1991 21:28 | 7 |
| Umm... I don't think you want to mix loads going into the amp like that
Steve. The smaller load will get more of the signal then the bigger
load (ie, in your example the 2x10 will be a lot louder then the 1x15).
Also, I didn't think the Bassmen liked a load less then 4 ohms...
Greg
|
171.22 | I should have been more clear | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Wed Jun 19 1991 10:04 | 9 |
|
Rats, I wasn't clear, Greg... I'd take the load into a y-cable and
plug er right into the speaker jack.. yep, you're right, Bassmens don't
like loads less than 4 ohms... I'm wondering how big a deal it would be
using a 3 ohm load?
Steve
|
171.23 | Which cab gets more power? | GURU::tomg | Danger: Slow Thinker at Work | Wed Jun 19 1991 11:06 | 11 |
|
On a related note:
Won't more of the power output go to the speaker box with
the lowest total ohm rating? I thought I noticed this when I had
a 1x15 (8ohm) and 2x10 (4 ohm). I thought the rig sounded kinda
thin and wimpy since I was driving the 10's more than the 15. In
my mind, I'd want to drive the 15 with more power than the 10s.
Does this make *any* sense.. ;^)
|
171.24 | | RGB::ROST | I believe she's a dope fiend | Wed Jun 19 1991 11:19 | 29 |
| Re: mixed ohms
Yeah, the lowest impedance sucks more of the power. Remember that the
voltage across each leg of a parallel connection is equal (vs. series
connects where *current* is equal). Anyway, quick math, asuuming the
cabs are 4 and 8 ohms:
Power is P = V X I, but since V = I X R, P = (V X V)/R
So since each cab has the same voltage across it, the 4 ohm cab sinks
*twice* the power of the 8 ohm cab. Of course, efficiency of the cabs
comes into play, too...if the 8 ohm cab is super efficient and the 4
isn't, the balance will be better, vice versa and things get even
worse.
I would *not* run that Bassman at 2.7 ohms. I've overheated and
smoked mine a few times (no damage beyond some melted insulation
luckily) trying such shenanigans. You could rewire the 10s in series
for 16 ohms (they are likely two 8 ohm drivers in parallel) then this
in parallel with the 15 gives 5.3 ohms and more power goes to the 15.
Tom, I'm still trying to figure out how you power speakers in your
mind, do you get a better tone than with tubes or transistors?
8^) 8^)
GreeVee, real men play with 15s anyway 8^) 8^) Forget those wimpy
10s.
Brian
|
171.25 | | WASTED::tomg | Danger: Slow Thinker at Work | Wed Jun 19 1991 11:32 | 8 |
|
re:.-1
Nyuk, Nyuk. It took a while but I finally got it..
;^)
-t
|
171.26 | The basics | BTOVT::BAGDY_M | METALGod in the making ! | Thu Jun 20 1991 08:59 | 5 |
|
Remember that current, no matter how small/large travels the
path of least resistance.
Matt
|
171.27 | Works cool! | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Thu Jun 20 1991 15:00 | 15 |
|
Yes.. I got it now.. turns out that I have a cab that I put an 8
and a 10 into just to dub around with.. wired them in series for a 16
ohm load and then connected that in parallel with my re-coned 8 ohm
gauss.. and the gauss absolutely sounds like it's getting more signal,
really the perfect setup, cos' I wouldn't want a bunch of juice going
into a 2x10 cab instead of the gauss... woiks great.... How come when I
turn it up I start to get distortion??? I know dumb question, but is
it the same as guitar?? Is that the amp??? I figured that I never be
able to get this gauss to rumble... or umm, did I mess up my ported cab
design??? [;^) Oboy one more thing to be compulsive about!
Greee Veee
|
171.28 | Why Do You Think Bassmans Sound Great With Guitars? | RGB::ROST | I believe she's a dope fiend | Thu Jun 20 1991 15:22 | 20 |
| You will defintiely get distortion with a Bassman. Varies from amp to
amp. Mine hits grunge at about 5-6 and melts down above 7.
The speaker cab can be causing *extra* distortion. Possible causes:
1. Bad port design. You have a frequency band where the port is not
driving enough and the speaker excursion is max (i.e. the voice coil
can't go any further) and you crank up a bit more....this is how you
blow speakers.
2. You have a lousy seal and the cab is resonating due to air leaking
out somewhere. Easy to check by running your hand (or ear) over every
seam, etc. and also check where the speaker mounts to the cab (you
*did* gasket it, I hope). I had a leaky gasket give me an ugly buzz
with my 12" til I sealed it up.
In both cases, the distortion will appear only on some of the notes
(typiclly the lowest ones).
Brian
|
171.29 | try this gre | HAMER::KRON | ELECTRIFIED | Thu Jun 20 1991 15:40 | 3 |
| also remember to dampen the cabinet.....you know
fiberglass insulation stapled to the back and sides to
eliminate standing waves that turn your signal to MUD!
|
171.30 | Airtight yes, fiberglass no..but! | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Thu Jun 20 1991 17:07 | 25 |
|
Yep.... Hmmmm.. maybe I'm being too picky... Mine stays nice and
clean on the bass channel up to about 7 with treb at 5 and bass rolled
a little off 7. Sealed! Is that mother sealed... I was listening
Brian, I'll check tonight for sure.. and yep, I used a gasket... Bill,
I didn't use fiberglass but I did use sheets of that 3 inch foam stuff
that we use as packing (y'know the stuff that looks like 3-d sine waves
all over one side and flat on the other)...
BTW, I should have shared a little tip, you guys probably already
know this one.. but I found this cool back plate for my box.. couple of
�" jacks and push clamps in, but (Brian got the message across about
getting the box airtighht except for the port) I couldn't figure out
how to seal it... I wound up using a fiber (disposable) salad bowl from
teh cafeteria (Yeah, I paid for it!) stapled around the edges, caulked
and then covered with the foam stuff.. made a great airtight seal for
the cable.. just brought my zip cord through a tiny little hole and
caulked it! I'm puttin' together my acoustic suspension 1x12 tonight..
look out!
Gree Vee
|
171.31 | Love that bottom! | PLOUGH::BRIDGE | leather lover | Tue Nov 30 1993 09:28 | 6 |
| I'll soon be in the market for a new bass head. Any ideas?
Thanks
John
|
171.32 | Peavey | NWACES::HICKERNELL | The dog ate my software! | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:26 | 23 |
| I just upgraded to a Peavey Mark IV head and I love it. It's a solid
state amp with:
210 watts @ 4 ohms
300 watts @ 2 ohms
2 channels:
Channel 1 has bass, midrange, treble knobs, bright switch, graphic EQ
switch, biamp output high/low frequency cutoff knob
Channel 2 has bass, midrange, treble knobs, bright switch, graphic EQ
switch, midrange frequency parameter knob
Also:
High and low input jacks, effects loop for each channel, 5-band graphic
EQ, biamp high/low output jacks, line output jack, preamp input jack,
channel footswitch jack (I don't have the switch)
In other words, it's got lots of power, and lots of tonal and
configuration flexibility. It's also not very heavy and promises to be
reliable, from everything I've heard about Peavey. I got it used from a
music store for $225 US a few months ago. And it sounds great, too!
Dave
|
171.33 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:51 | 6 |
|
see 2.2729 for a mint condition, great sounding bass
amp and cabinet. Pretty sure it's still available.
Tom
|
171.34 | go to the source | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Tue Nov 30 1993 11:04 | 6 |
| How's your back? The old Ampeg SVT is still the benchmark for bass
amps. There's also a new, high tech rackmount version (still all tube)
called SVT-III (I think; Brian?). Mucho lbs and $$$, but still
unsurpassed
/charles_atlas
|
171.35 | Current Ampeg Heads | TECRUS::ROST | Fretting less, enjoying it more | Tue Nov 30 1993 11:29 | 13 |
| Re:.34
The original SVT is no longer made.
The SVT-II at $1900 list is the successor, still big, heavy, all tube.
The SVT-III and SVT3-PRO are rackmount models with tube preamps and
solid state power (350/450 watts respectively) for $850/$1100 list.
There are also some all-solid state models, SVT-200 and SVT-400
($800/$1100).
Brian
|
171.36 | | NWACES::HICKERNELL | The dog ate my software! | Tue Nov 30 1993 11:39 | 7 |
| re: .34
If you decide to go this route and find a used one, be sure the tubes
are still available. I don't know what the SVT used, but some of the
old Ampegs amps used tubes that are difficult to find nowadays.
Dave
|
171.37 | | GOES11::HOUSE | You sick little monkey! | Tue Nov 30 1993 12:16 | 5 |
| re: .31
It'd probably help with the recommendations if you told us your budget.
Greg
|
171.38 | | PLOUGH::BRIDGE | leather lover | Tue Nov 30 1993 12:50 | 5 |
| Greg,
I'd like to stay around $500....
John
|
171.39 | | DABEAN::REAUME | Six Flags over Syracuse | Tue Nov 30 1993 13:07 | 7 |
|
My old Ampeg Portaflex used 7027A tubes. These are very hard to
find these days. I think a good amp tech could re-bias the amp
to use a more common tube. I'm not sure how *different* these
other Ampeg tubes are.
|
171.40 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Tue Nov 30 1993 13:35 | 12 |
| The original SVTs used 6146 power tubes (6 of em); these put out a
healthy 330 watts RMS. Later models used 6550s, which dropped the wattage
to a "puny" 240. Ampeg purists favor the 6146s, and these are not hard
to find according to Ken Fischer (owner of Trainwreck Amps and generally
acknowledged Ampeg guru). Just don't expect to walk into Daddy's and
buy some. I believe 6550's were used in 70's and 80's Marshall guitar
amps (the American models) and are easy to find.
$500 (or less) will get you a clean used SVT head. Play one, and you'll
never want anything else.
/bill_wyman
|
171.41 | | POWDML::BUCKLEY | violent new breed | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:16 | 2 |
| Heard a bassist the other night using an SVT with a Rick -- reminded
me how good that amp sounds!
|
171.42 | | LEDS::ORSI | GotInAt2WithA10+WokeUpAt10WithA2 | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:30 | 10 |
|
Re - What Rick said
Yeah, the 6146 is what alot of Ham radio guys use in their
transmitters. They're not hard to find, just check the back
of Amatuer Radio mag...there's loads of ads...sorta like in
Guitar Player mag.
Neal
|
171.43 | | GOES11::HOUSE | You sick little monkey! | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:31 | 9 |
| If you want a similar sound at a lower price and weight, try an Ampeg
V4B. A friend of mine uses one and I've always liked the sound. 100
watts, all tube. He retubed it recently and said he had a little
trouble finding some of the tubes, but not *too* bad.
For very low weight, GK makes/made some fairly nice sounding solid
state stuff.
Greg
|
171.44 | | TECRUS::ROST | Fretting less, enjoying it more | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:52 | 5 |
| >Play one, and you'll never want anything else.
Except a derrick to move it.
|
171.45 | | GOES11::HOUSE | You sick little monkey! | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:25 | 1 |
| And you thought that Twin was bad...
|
171.46 | | KDX200::COOPER | There's a moon in the sky! | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:57 | 17 |
| The attached is IMHO.
This is the 90's.
Ditch the cranes, derricks etc... and get yourself a GK800, Trace
Elliot, Hartke etc... I've heard SVT's, and while they sound GREAT,
I don't think they sound so much better than the GK/TE/Hartke offerings
that you can afford to supply the person-power to MOVE one.
:-)
I saw the bassist for Vinny Moores band had a Crown power amp anna
BBE bass PreAmp running thru a 8x10 Ampeg cab. Twice as sweet, 1/2
the cost and weight. :-)
jc
|
171.47 | | GOES11::HOUSE | You sick little monkey! | Tue Nov 30 1993 17:04 | 4 |
| Actually, a friend of mine used to use a Yamaha SPX-90 as a preamp into
a Crown DC300 power amp into some sort of folded cab. Sounded great!
Greg
|
171.48 | | LEDS::BURATI | boss burato | Tue Nov 30 1993 17:12 | 9 |
| HeadRoom == SVT;
You know those MTV sports shows? They should have an SVT competition
with a distance event where bass players run carrying an SVT head. Lead
players can choose between the Twin event (carrying a twin in each
hand) or the Major event (two Marshall Majors). Results are measured in
inches.
Eddie Van Halon
|
171.49 | | FREEBE::REAUME | Six Flags over Syracuse | Tue Nov 30 1993 20:17 | 11 |
|
<-S-W-R-> = good stuff.
I don't admit to knowing diddly about bass rigs, but I've
gigged with a few players with SWR rigs and they all sounded
HOT!
I thing Ampeg made great gear for their time, but just like I
deal with my guitar gear, I don't want gear that I can't by parts
for in a couple years.
|
171.50 | | PLOUGH::BRIDGE | leather lover | Wed Dec 01 1993 06:46 | 7 |
|
Thanks for all the suggestions. Now where can I find all these amps to
give them a try? I live in Derry N.H. and the only store around me is
Daddy's. And all you can find there is Peavey.
John
|
171.51 | good gear is timeless | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Wed Dec 01 1993 07:40 | 7 |
| >> I thing Ampeg made great gear for their time, but just like I
>> deal with my guitar gear, I don't want gear that I can't by parts
>> for in a couple years.
Hey Boom, ya mean like Kitty Hawks? :-)
re SVT pulls, I love it!!!
|
171.52 | A Few Northern MA Dealers | TECRUS::ROST | Fretting less, enjoying it more | Wed Dec 01 1993 07:42 | 8 |
| Ampeg can be found at Turn 1 Music (is that the right name? used to be
Hamel's) in Chelmsford, MA.
EU Wurlitzer's has SWR, Hartke, GK...you'll have to travel to Boston.
Performance Music in Burlington has SWR.
Brian
|
171.53 | Miscellaneous ramblings | NWACES::HICKERNELL | The dog ate my software! | Wed Dec 01 1993 08:21 | 43 |
| > My old Ampeg Portaflex used 7027A tubes. These are very hard to
> find these days. I think a good amp tech could re-bias the amp
> to use a more common tube.
My Ampeg B-25 head uses 7027As. They're not exactly easy to find, but
I think they're around. A friend who does amp work told me he thought
the head could be modified to use one of the more common power tubes,
and it would sound similar. Mine has been extremely reliable, but who
wants to do that with a head that's already twenty-odd years old? It
also uses a 7199 tube that's at least as hard to find. (What's that
tube do, anyway?) And it uses a 5AR4 (GZ34) rectumfrier tube, which
may not be a good thing for bass.
> $500 (or less) will get you a clean used SVT head. Play one, and you'll
> never want anything else.
The problem is, Rick may be right. %^)
Personally, though, I tend to agree with Coop - there's some outstanding
stuff out there now, and for $500 you can get a very nice head,
especially if you buy used. The fact that it's lighter and I have a bad
back has absolutely *no* bearing on this opinion. %^)
re: Ron's competition
And the keyboard players have to push a B-3 that's on wheels.
> I live in Derry N.H. and the only store around me is Daddy's.
Far be it from me to recommend a store like *that*, but that's where I
bought my Peavey head. And don't write off Peavey until you've tried
them; I think they make good stuff, if you don't mind paying less.
The Music Factory in Salem (and Manchester, I think) carries Hartke and
G-K amps; last time I was in there they had a used (recent, solid state)
Ampeg head as well. They're good people to deal with.
The Music Workshop in Salem carries Fender and has a number of used
amps. They're good people, too, but I wasn't that impressed with the
Fender amps I played through (although the prices were sometimes
impressive).
Dave
|
171.54 | more ramblings | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Wed Dec 01 1993 09:20 | 20 |
| Back when I was shopping for a bass amp (circa '89) I bought a used
GK-400 on approval. It blew up the first time I used it. Around the
same time my band saw Victor Bailey playing at the Willow in Somerville;
his GK-800 blew up on stage, and the other players made comments to the
effect that this was not an uncommon occurrence. That's when I decided
to buy SWR.
SWR is nice, but you'll have trouble finding even a used one for $500.
AMP made a nice head (ask Brian Rost), similar to the SWR but a bit
less warm sounding. No longer made, hard to find used, but if you
do it'd probably come in under your budget.
The Trace gear I've seen is extremely heavy AND expensive; the worst
of both worlds.
I found SWR the best compromise between sound and weight/convenience.
If my back were up to it though, I'd drop it for an SVT in a minute.
/bootsy
|
171.55 | | TECRUS::ROST | Fretting less, enjoying it more | Wed Dec 01 1993 09:26 | 5 |
| Re: .54
Hey, Rick, tell 'em about how the SWR blew on ya, too 8^)
Smokey
|
171.56 | oh yeah | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Will work for '59 Les Paul | Wed Dec 01 1993 09:38 | 5 |
| True, my first unit from SWR arrived with shipping damage;
crunched inner carton, minor case buckling, erratic performance.
They eventually replaced the unit, it's been 4 years of bliss since.
/ralph_nader
|
171.57 | If you don't *have* to have tubes | ZYMRGY::sam | I made life easy just by laughing | Wed Dec 01 1993 13:21 | 10 |
| I absolutely love my BBE 383 bass preamp. I think I only paid about $189
for it, new, from Thoroughbred Music. You would of course need a power amp
and a rack, which would add to the expense though. Or do like I do and run
the preamp direct into the PA.
And I agree with the previous note that Peavey stuff shouldn't be ignored
just because of the name. They make good, reliable gear for reasonable
money (REAL cheap used) and it doesn't sound bad at all.
-- Sam
|
171.58 | | GOES11::HOUSE | You sick little monkey! | Wed Dec 01 1993 14:07 | 1 |
| Not gonna say anything about your Carvin, Sam?
|
171.59 | | LEDS::BURATI | boss burato | Wed Dec 01 1993 14:16 | 7 |
| > re: Ron's competition
> And the keyboard players have to push a B-3 that's on wheels.
Close, Dave. Actually it's the B3 PULL. Very much like a tractor pull.
Takes place in a muddy parking lot at 2:45 AM.
Jimmy McGruff
|
171.60 | | ZYMRGY::sam | I made life easy just by laughing | Wed Dec 01 1993 14:44 | 16 |
| Carvin? Oh yeah, my *other* bass amp! :-)
That one's real nice too. Small package, 150w into 1x10 speaker with
external speaker jacks. About $330 new from Carvin. And even with just
the 1x10 its plenty loud to play with another guitarist and drummer, unless
you crank it up to the pain threshold all the time.
Eventually, when I break down and buy a power amp, I'm going to go out of
my BBE's "high" biamp to the Carvin and it's 1x10, and the "low" biamp
output to the new power amp, which will then power my 1x18 cab. Should be
able to induce involuntary bowel evacuation from the audience with that
setup! (And not just from my (lack of) playing ability! :-)) I used the
above setup last night (sans power amp - the Carvin supplied all the power)
and it sounded great.
-- Sam
|
171.61 | My quest goes on.... | PLOUGH::BRIDGE | leather lover | Thu Dec 02 1993 07:56 | 17 |
|
I went to Hampshire Music yesterday and tried a "Tube Works" amp.
A little thing with 300w's 2-10's and a tweeter. It had a switch for
solid state or tubes. There's also an ext cab you can buy with 1 15'.
GREAT sound!!!
Anyone else try one?
And what stores would be good to go to in Boston?
Thanks for your help!!
John
P
|