T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
135.1 | Boogie | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Mon Dec 29 1986 12:24 | 34 |
| In my mind:
Versatility == Mesa Boogie
The Boogie also complements the Peavey in that you have a very wide
range of options if you go to a two-amp setup and start getting
into stereo delay.
The Boogie has an extremely wide range of clean and chunky (slightly
dirty sounds). It has a great lead tone, but in the heavy-dirty-sound
catagory it is not as versatile as certain other amps, although
the latest models have made some improvements in this area.
But be warned that Boogies are very expensive, but the vast majority
of Boogie owners I've met think they are worth it. Obviously you
should sit down with one and experiment with it before ordering
one.
Another point against Boogies: One combo-style Boogie does not make
a very good stage monitor. I often have problems hearing myself
unless I am able to point the speaker at my ears. This is probably
true of most small-combo style amps, but they are very directional.
In the case of the boogie, you can get a stack-type setup
for almost the same money that will allow you to hear yourself better.
On the other hand, if you expect to have some other method of
monitoring and run your guitar through the PA, the Boogie will probably
give you better sounds. I'm from the "stage-amplification-is-strictly-
for-monitoring-and-less-is-more---let-the-guy-on-the-PA-board-control-
the-house-sound" school. I've even given some thought to setting
up the boogie in the way you might set up a vocal monitor (in front
of the band) and not using any other on-stage amp for the guitar.
db
|
135.2 | Sweetness | PABLO::DUBE | | Tue Dec 30 1986 08:29 | 12 |
| I also own a Boogie, and I love it. Dave's comments regarding the
Boogie are right on the money.
Speaking of money, though, Boogies are expensive amplifiers. If
you don't want to spend as much, I was very impressed with the Roland
Jazz Chorus amp. I don't know any details about the amp, (maybe
someone else reading this can help you), but it sure sounds sweet.
The built-in chorus gives a great fullness to the guitar sound.
It might also fit in well with the music you play.
-Dan
|
135.3 | Ditto on the Roland JC's | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Mon Dec 29 1986 16:30 | 29 |
| I would also echo Dan's comments about the Roland Jazz Chorus.
I consider those amps to be excellent "clean" amps. The Chorus
sound on them is indeed incredible and is going to be a whole lot
better than any box you're likely to buy because it is actually
a builtin STEREO delay. The rolands are an incredible deal in that
price range for clean amps.
However, if you're going to use a two-amp setup with a DDL, that
MAY limit the attractiveness of that stereo chorus because you could
actually get a cleaner more dramatic chorus sound using the two amps
and a DDL.
However (and this may seem like a contradiction), my current choice
for a second amp to go with the Boogie IS a Roland JC-120. The
reason is that if you have a two amp setup with one amp getting
a delayed signal, it is hard to switch between distortion and clean
chorused sound because you definitely don't (or *I* definitely don't)
want the delay in lead mode because it muddies up the sound badly.
My plan is to use the Boogie for clean and lead, the JC-120 for
clean chorused sounds AND stereo delay from the Boogie (the 120
watts of the JC also allows it to go louder and still stay clean
than the 60 watt Boogie), and control
the whole thing with a pan pedal. I've thought about this a lot
and that setup seems to have the best options in terms of flexibility
and control.
db
|
135.4 | Baby Boogie | GENRAL::ALBERTUS | | Thu Feb 05 1987 14:26 | 7 |
| Just read this and saw an ad in a Pro Sound flyer about a new
Mesa-Boogie ... 20 watts, dual channel w/some good stuff (effects,
etc.) built in ... right around $400 (cheap for a Mesa!). Kinda
small for any serious stage work but outa blow your doors out at
home.
AA
|
135.5 | carefull | SKYLIT::SAWYER | | Thu Feb 05 1987 15:15 | 43 |
|
re. 20 watt $400 mesa boogie...
i dunno....
tried a million amps in the last cupla years...
i don't know anything about electronics except....ask dave dreher...
that usually works....
or ask len....
but.....ya see.... boogie (and marshall) make this great sounding
amp...50-100 watts with all the trimmings....800-1300 bucks...
once ya get into the medium and bottom end of their stuff....they
make toys that sound....ok...not bad...doesn't make me vomit...
and those are the points...
if it says "mesa boogie" on it and has all the trimmins and cost
1200 bucks....buy it....
if it has mesa boogie with out all the trimmins and costs $400....
be very carefull about what your buying...
i bought a 400 $ marshall...30 watts....it's better than....
nothing
silvertone
crate
peavey
death
a broken 30 watt $400 marshall
but it's not REALLY a marshall...marshall just wanted to get as
much of the market as it could so it produced a toy and called
it a marshall.
i played 2 small boogies at 2 different places and immediately
(at the same places) tried the real ones....
i wouldn't buy the toy....
course, that's just MY opinion and can be totally meaningless.
better check it out....
|
135.6 | GOOD IDEAS | NWD002::MILLSSC | | Fri Feb 13 1987 02:43 | 6 |
| THANKS FOR THE HOT TIP OWNING 3 LES PAULS AND A FEW ACOUSTICS COST
IS NOT A PRIORITY IF THE AMP IS GOING TO PEFORM IN THE MANNER EXPECTED
IT APPEARS HOWEVER MESSA BOOGIE SEEMS TO BE THE WORD ON THE STREET
IAM TRYING TO FIND OUT WHATS A FAVORITE MODEL AND PERHAPS SOME PRETTY
SLICK WAYS TO SET IT UP IN CONJUNCTION WITH CERTAIN EFFECTS
THANKS FOR THE FEED BACK / NO PUN INTENDED SCOTTY
|