T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
118.4 | Speaking of ES335's... | SQM::CLABORN | You really oughta gen! | Thu Dec 04 1986 12:49 | 5 |
| Ran across an ad for a '72 ES335 in "excellent" condition for $550.
If it really is in at least good condition, what do you experts
think? Is this a good deal?
Thanks, George
|
118.5 | Well.... | LYMPH::LAMBERT | Note(d) Author | Thu Dec 04 1986 13:15 | 21 |
| Personally, I think that sounds like just an "okay" deal. I know where I
can get a *brand new* 335 (dot neck) for $650, and that was the price
offered by the salesbozo without haggling. It's got a couple of burn
marks in it from sitting on a hot stand in the display window, though...
They list for about $1200 new, which translates to about $750 regular
retail. (Most stores give you about 40% off list on guitars, especially
expensive ones...)
So, in "mint" condition it might be worth $500 *if* that particular guitar
plays well, etc. As stated in another note though, guitars made in the 70s
by some of the big companies aren't "the best".
My advice you ask? (You didn't? Well, here it is anyway :-): Check it
out, and if you like *that particular* guitar, offer the seller $400 and
see what happens. Be willing to go to $500. Deduct at least $50 if it
doesn't have a good hardshell case, too.
One man's opinion...
-- Sam
|
118.6 | Mucho dinero... | PARSEC::MELENDEZ | | Thu Dec 04 1986 14:33 | 3 |
| Too much. Save a little and wait a little and get a new one for
about 200 or so more.
|
118.1 | Sorry, but you asked for it... | HAMSTR::PELKEY | | Fri Dec 05 1986 14:17 | 13 |
| Be real nice to it for a few days, then the day you plan on asking
it out, send a box of candy, or a dozen yellow roses.
If you get shot down the first time, offer to bring it to a french
resturaunt. They like snails.....
Sorry, I couldn't resist.....
All-in-fun
ray
|
118.7 | I'd like to try one | FDCV20::CUMMINGS | | Sat Dec 06 1986 22:51 | 10 |
|
Speaking of ES-335's (and guitars like that).... how do es-335's
generally play? I'm a longtime Strat player, but I'd like to get
a second electric (hollow body) for a darker sound. How do the
Ibanez es-335 style guitars rate? I'd like to try a couple of
these guitars...
/paul
|
118.2 | Now just a date but a Wedding. | EAYV01::MCALINDIN | | Mon Dec 08 1986 06:24 | 12 |
| Yes proud to announce I am now happily wed to an ES335.
The big day was yesterday the flowers and the candy were no use,
at once the production of lots of bits of paper with the Queens
head on them did the trick, I didn't even have to get down on one
knee. By the way she was born in 86 and thats been confirmed.
The honeymoon starts this weekend........ well ......
In bliss,
Tony.
|
118.8 | Three FIFTY five | PISCES::KELLYJ | | Mon Dec 08 1986 08:07 | 20 |
| I have an ES-355, which is basically a 335 with gold hardware and
more binding. Comaper to a Strat (I also play a '72 Strat), the
Gibson has a much hotter sound...sort of what you'd expect from
humbuckers vs. single coil. The sound isn't as heavy as solid body
with humbuckers (e.g. Les Paul) and can be sweet if you don't lean
on the strings too hard. Of course, this is how I hear the sound...you
may find it different.
Playability is outstanding with my ES. Feedback has never been
a problem. I play through a tiny amp (Fender Deluxe Revereb) cranked
and the mild distortion resulting fromt thhis combination can be
just right for a Larry Carlton sort of sound.
Totally off the subject: I traded a 1965 Dodge Dart (slant six)
for this guitar...even. The Dodge died ont eh way to a gig about
four years ago.
Regards,
Johnny Jupiter
|
118.9 | Ibanez vs. Gibson | LYMPH::LAMBERT | Note(d) Author | Mon Dec 08 1986 10:26 | 16 |
| re: .-2
Also remember that the 335/345/355 guitars are *semi* hollowbody. They
have a nice solid hunk of wood running thru the middle of the body, under
the pickups, that adds some sustain while cutting down on the feedback
which is characteristic of full hollow body electrics.
I got to play an Ibanez Artist 335 clone at the same sitting as a Gibson
335. The Gibson has a much larger body which contributes to a much
deeper, rounder tone. It was set up with easier action, too, so it played
much more nicely. The Gibsons sell for ~ $750. The price tag I saw on the
Ibanez said $739, and I'm not sure if that was the "list" or "selling"
price, but if it's the selling price there's no doubt in my mind that I
would choose the Gibson, given the cash.
-- Sam
|
118.10 | Want one? | HAVOC::DESROCHERS | | Mon Dec 08 1986 13:28 | 13 |
|
I'm going to be selling a few guitars soon, but since this topic
came up, I might as well put one up now. I have 2 335's. One is
for sale. It's either '72 or '73, chocolate brown, and in really
good shape. It's never been used outside the home so it hasn't
been abused at all. I want $475 for it. I feel it's worth at
least that so, thruthfully, I'm not interested in dickering.
I work at the Mill and live in Marlboro. If you're seriously
interested, I'm at HAVOC::DESROCHERS
Tom
|
118.3 | Don't forget the batteries.. | HAMSTR::PELKEY | | Mon Dec 08 1986 16:39 | 13 |
|
< The big day was yesterday the flowers and the candy were no use,
< at once the production of lots of bits of paper with the Queens
< head on them did the trick, I didn't even have to get down on one
< knee. By the way she was born in 86 and thats been confirmed.
<
Must-a been your carisma !!
|
118.11 | Solid Body ES335??? | SMURF::LAMBERT | Things fall apart; it's scientific | Tue Dec 05 1989 15:36 | 15 |
| (My, how things catch up to you. I haven't been in this file for years,
came here to ask a question, and found this topic with some old notes
me (LYMPH::LAMBERT). And I still like 335s! :-) Now let's see if
everyone uses NEXT UNSEEN and sees this old topic...)
Has anyone ever heard of a SOLID-BODY ES-335? To me this sounds like
a contradiction in terms but someone just told me they have one for
sale. I assume this is something new, if it actually exists.
Anyone have any idea what kind of price these beasts would pull in?
Thanks in advance,
-- Sam
|
118.12 | Firebrand | AQUA::ROST | Subliminal trip to nowhere | Tue Dec 05 1989 15:45 | 12 |
|
Gibson did make a solidbody 335 but it was one of those low-price
"Firebrand" guitars. It had a shrunken 335 shape, two humbuckers, etc.
They sold new for something like $500 *list*.
I'm trying to remember exactly what the heck the model designation was
on the thing....I'm sure Danny will know.
Glad to see you're still alive, Sam!! 8^) 8^) 8^)
Brian
|
118.13 | I've seen one before | MPGS::MIKRUT | Don't you boys know any NICE songs? | Tue Dec 05 1989 15:52 | 3 |
| Isn't that the model they called the ES-335S?
cheers/mike
|
118.14 | it only look's solid....? | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Tue Dec 05 1989 16:19 | 8 |
| You guy's aren't talkin about the Studio Es335 are you? Has no
F holes and no pickup covers?
If it was or is a solid body it still must have tone chambers...
I can't imagine the weight of a piece of wood that size....
Rick
|
118.15 | Danny does know | TOOTER::WEBER | | Tue Dec 05 1989 16:56 | 15 |
| Gibson made the ES-335S in the early '80's and it was part of the
Firebrand series of low-cost guitars. It has nothing in common with the
335, but is more like a a double cut LP Jr. Just another example of
Gibson's dumb marketing.
There was a Custom and a Standard model, but only a small difference
between the two--the Custom had a coil tap, better hardware and a
mahogany neck.
Come to think of it, there was a non-Firebrand version called the
Standard, with a bound, ebony fingerboard.
I'd guess these are worth $200-$300 if they're clean.
Danny W.
|
118.16 | could be interesting | SMURF::LAMBERT | Things fall apart; it's scientific | Tue Dec 05 1989 17:41 | 11 |
| Thanks for the info. I'll be picking it up for a "test ride" tomorrow
night. (A friend has it and is going to loan it to me to see if I like
it enough to buy it. Yes, Mike - I'll have it for Thursday's jam! :-))
He says it's brand new, with a hardshell, and he's asking $350. I'll
look very closely.
Thanks again,
-- Sam
|
118.17 | Update (or, "Bingo! I found a new guitar!") | SMURF::LAMBERT | Things fall apart; it's scientific | Mon Dec 11 1989 13:51 | 22 |
| Okay, here's the scoop: I picked up the guitar last week as planned and
have been playing it. I'm gonna buy it.
The neck tag is labelled "Firebrand ES-335S Standard". It is a solid body.
It's unfinished (oiled) wood (mahogany? walnut? I can't tell - it's a
darkish wood stained darker brown, and heavy), neck is the same material,
rosewood fretboard, dual humbuckers (the black and ivory ones). Flat top,
no pickguard, Les Paul style bridge and controls. No coil taps. It came
with a new 'Paul style hardshell case.
It still had the plastic covering on the access panel in the back. Had
been used for practice only a couple of times. I had to clean up the frets
and bridge due to some little rust spots (it had been "ridden hard and put
away wet" :-)). A thorough oiling, string height and intonation adjust-
ment, and I was on my way.
Plays like a dream, and sounds wonderful. Sustains like a m-f.
I've got my Christmas present early. Life is Good.
-- Sam
P.S. The same guy has a used Jazz Chorus amp for sale. Hmm... :-)
|
118.18 | Walnut | AQUA::ROST | Everyone loves those dead presidents | Mon Dec 11 1989 15:34 | 6 |
|
Re: .13
The Firebrand guitars were made from walnut.
|
118.19 | sounds neat..... | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Fry Zsa Zsa, Free James Brown | Tue Dec 12 1989 09:20 | 10 |
| re.13
Sam,
What shape is this "rare" solid body.....double cutaway? Is it thick
like a Les Paul, or thin like an SG? I've seen the walnut Les Pauls
called "Firebrand" or "The Paul", but this sounds like a Gibbo that
I've never seen. Just when I thought I knew alot about Gibsons!
Steve
|
118.20 | Maple | TOOTER::WEBER | | Tue Dec 12 1989 10:13 | 10 |
| While some firebrands were walnut, the 335S-Standard was stained maple.
The model designations of these are out of sync with other Gibsons.
Standard, Custom, Deluxe in order of increasing price. Only the
Standard has a maple body and neck--the others both have mahogany
bodies and necks.
The thickness is 1-1/2"--thicker than an SG, thinner than an LP.
Danny W.
|
118.21 | What it is | SMURF::LAMBERT | Things fall apart; it's scientific | Tue Dec 12 1989 10:23 | 12 |
| re: .15
Well, thanks! I think it's kind of neat myself. (I like uniqueness.)
The guitar is very similar in size and weight to a Firebrand/"The" Paul.
It's a double cutaway with small "horns" on the top. It's vaguely reminiscent
of an Ibanez Artist, but with a longer body, and the lower lobes are wider.
It's about 2" thick ('Paul thickness), with contours in the back where it
contacts your torso and on the front where your right arm crosses (sort of ala'
Strat). 22 fret glued on neck. It's pretty heavy, and has a lot of sustain.
-- Sam
|
118.22 | talk about "out of sync" :-) | SMURF::LAMBERT | Things fall apart; it's scientific | Tue Dec 12 1989 10:28 | 15 |
| Oh goody, more info.
re: <<< Note 119.16 by TOOTER::WEBER >>>
(Danny - thanks for all your information to date, by the way.)
> The model designations of these are out of sync with other Gibsons.
> Standard, Custom, Deluxe in order of increasing price.
Excuse my ignorance, but what are the "normal" designations that
these are out of sync with? S, D, C?
Hey, I don't mind maple. :-)
-- Sam
|
118.23 | bad marketing | TOOTER::WEBER | | Wed Dec 13 1989 08:56 | 16 |
| Gibson's usual order is Custom, Standard, Deluxe with Custom being the
most expensive.
Gibson did a terrible marketing job on the firebrand guitars--very
little differentiation between models and confusing nomenclature are
just two of the mistakes they made. The worst mistake was treating
these guitars as poor relations of the real things, instead of
promoting them as well made, good playing and sounding instruments that
had less ornamentation but better real quality than the imports against
which they were designed to compete.
At their current used prices these guitars are an excellent value. It
would be hard to find a better instrument in this price range.
Danny W.
|
118.24 | I'm JEALOUS!!! | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Frog lickers unite! | Wed Apr 11 1990 13:59 | 12 |
| I road tested Pat Blair's (Patman) NEW ES-335 Dot last night. WHAT an
AXE! I WANT ONE!!!! I was surprised at the weight; it's been a while
since I owned one. His has a solid block inside that starts at the
neck and runs far enough for both pickups to mount on. I *think* my
old 1972 model had a block running inside thru the neck pickup only
with my bridge pickup mounting "on" the body surface only. Anyway,
this baby is natural in color, the neck is really fine, action is great
and the neck flex is minor compared to the Washburn HB35. The good 'ol
Gibson tone is there with 1959 re-issue PAF's. It's a blues/southern
rock machine!!
Bulldawg......way to go Patman!
|