T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
31.1 | are S.D. the hottest Passive p/u's? | FDCV18::CUMMINGS | | Tue Aug 26 1986 16:17 | 13 |
|
that's interesting. i've replaced the bridge p/u on my 73 strat
with a SD "custom" (cant remember the #), and it's hotter than the
original. i have been considering changing the other two (rythym)
p/u 's. does the stack alter the sound to the point that it doesn't
sound like a strat anymore? also, do any of the hottest SD p/u's
look like the original strat p/u's? such as the Classic Stack?
i'm also interested in replacing the neck. i have a maple neck
that's 1 5/8" at the nut an am looking for some thing a hair
wider, with a less shiny (slippery) finish, and possibly wider
frets too. any experience with that?.....paul
|
31.2 | | BAXTA::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Wed Aug 27 1986 08:03 | 31 |
| the stack pickups sound just liek a strat, but they have no hum
since they are a humbucker. The design is two coils wound around
the same magnet one on top of each other, then you get the choice
of how to connect them, in/out of phase, humbucking etc...I love
my strat sounds and always hated the damn hum, especially when using
alot of preamp gain(ie distortion) I get no hum, less than what
I get from my humbuckers on my other three electrics.....and the
biting strat sound is intact....
the strat series of DUncans:
Classic strat stack
Hot stack
Vintage staggered SSL-1
Vintage flat (Magnets equal height)
HOT:
SSL-3 and SSL-3 tapped
Quarter pound strat SSL-4 SSL-4T (tapped)
Custom staggered SSL-5 SSSL-5T
Custom flat SSL-6
Quarter pounder staggered SSL-7 and SSL-7T
Alinco II Pro strat (alinco magnets)
HOT RAILS the hottest output strat pickup its a humbucker but you
don't have top cut a new pickup hole
Duncan makes killer pickups!
dave
|
31.3 | How much for SD's? | DAIRY::SHARP | Say something once, why say it again? | Wed Aug 27 1986 11:53 | 6 |
| This sounds great. How much do these Duncan pickups run? I've powered up my
Strat with 3 DiMarzio's which have classic/hi-output settings, but even
though I've shielded it to the max I still get that annoying hum. The
DiMarzios set me back $150 for the three of them about 4 years ago.
Don.
|
31.4 | | BAXTA::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Wed Aug 27 1986 12:53 | 8 |
| I got my stacks from Wurlitzers for $140 for all three....but they
list for around $65 each, I think youcan tlk them down to about
$45-50 if you know the salesman real good and hold your mouth
right.....Note that the stacks are the only true single coil sounding
humbuckers that duncan makes the hot rails will sound more like
the traditional humbucker.....good luck
dave
|
31.5 | will the Stacks drop in? | FDCV18::CUMMINGS | | Wed Aug 27 1986 17:39 | 8 |
|
So do the (classic) stacks look like the original strat pickups
with the pole pieces and everything? and are they direct replacements?
just drop 'em in? i have a 73 strat, if that matters...
paul
|
31.6 | | BAXTA::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Thu Aug 28 1986 09:31 | 7 |
| Yes they look the same, they didn't use to, they were this horrible
maroon plastic with no pole peices but I think that semour gto some
feedback from the customer......my stacks are thet horrible maroon
but I've gotten used to them.....they drop right in no modifications,
they even give you new springs and screws to mount them with.
dave
|
31.7 | are they louder too? | FDCV18::CUMMINGS | | Thu Aug 28 1986 13:13 | 9 |
|
not too drag this out, but... how much more output did you get
out of the Stack as compared to the original p/u's? 2x,..or more?
I'd be curious to know what the DC resistance is on the stacks...
paul
|
31.8 | | BIGALO::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Sun Aug 24 1986 07:21 | 9 |
| the hot stacks give a good high output.....not sure how I'd quantify
it, they'r not that hot, but hotter than the stock pickups I had....
I have no idea about the dc resistance....why would you wish to
know?
dave
Peeess: Rik heard them yesterday....mayhaps he could comment on
the sound.....
|
31.9 | ya got me! | CAR::OPERATOR | boy, this is fun! | Sun Aug 24 1986 08:25 | 38 |
| well, I'll comment but not because I know anything. I'll comment
cuz playing guitar, making love and giving my opinion are my 3
favorite things to do.
Yup, they sounded hot.
but, where does one draw the lines between the pickup, the amp
and the guitarist.
and the guitar itself.
dave bottom sounded/played better (if you can believe it) yesterday
than even his tapes indicated.
I was.....
a. amazed
b. impressed
c. extremely happy
d. stoned
e. all the above
if you picked e, you win this years grand prize of a chaperoned
trip for 2 to upper black eddy n.j. for the annual frog jumping
contest.
sure, the sound he was getting was hot.
but, was that him?
or the amp?
or the pickups?
or the axe?
or the whole combination.
Personally, I think it was the whole combination but
I'd like to emphasis that Dave Bottom could probably pick up a piece
of wood, attach 2 pieces of fence wire, stand next to a mattel toy
microphone and still sound HOT!
Now, did that clarify things for everyone?
rik s.
|
31.10 | is it real or is it the pickups? | BIGALO::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Wed Sep 03 1986 10:19 | 3 |
| Gosh...blush.....I'm overwhelmed.....but I will say that anyone
who gets a chance to jam with Rik is in for a real treat......this
guy's hot......
|
31.11 | I tried Duncan, THANKS ! | GLIND1::VALASEK | | Tue Jan 20 1987 11:01 | 22 |
| RE. Pickups
I would like to add that I solved my Hum problem with a Seymour
Duncan Hot Stack for my strat. I checked out the EMG pickups, and
not only did it require a pre-amp, but the guitar still hummed.
The pickups were installed in a Strat at my local music store. When
I hit the distortion unit, pow, hum, depending on which way I rotated
the guitar either increased the hum, or decreased. The salesman
informed me that the EMG's had a broader frequence range than the
Duncan's but I bought the Duncan anyway. I took Duncan home and
wired it in the bridge position of the Strat, leaving the other
single coils in tact (just in case). I am extremely pleased with
the Duncan, I will probably go back and get two more. I would like
to thank everyone that contributed anything to the pickups topic
both in this topic and others. Without your help the decision would
have been much more difficult (salesman confusion), and I probably
wouldn't have gotten what I really wanted.
Thanks everyone !
Tony
|
31.12 | Questions ? | 42094::KENT | | Mon Jan 12 1987 21:27 | 7 |
|
Does it still sound like a Strat ? How easy is it to fit the new
pickups?
Paul
|
31.13 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Tue Jan 13 1987 00:25 | 12 |
| Paul, I have 3 stacks in my strat, I've used them for a few years
now. They sound just like a strat with the exception of no hum.
These things are better at killing hum than my humbuckers on my
other guitars extremely clean. They are sized exactly the same as
the existing pickup sin the guitar. Just screw em in and solder
the connections. The stack comes in two models a "classic" and the
"hot", I bought the hot since I like good strogn signals. I think
the "classic" would be a bit low output for my useage and the sound
otherwise appears (based on hearing the classics in another strat)
about the same.
dave
|
31.14 | Easy as cake | GLIND1::VALASEK | | Sun Feb 16 1986 14:13 | 5 |
| Yes, I agree, It took me approximately 30 minutes to install the
new pickup. Very easy. I was also worried about losing the STRAT
sound. I did not. I also bought the Hot Stack. I paid $42 for one.
There are no modifications to make either, they just plop right
in. Go for it !!
|
31.15 | question? | ASGNQH::LINGLEY | | Sun Feb 16 1986 16:14 | 12 |
|
It seems everyone is pretty impressed by these pickups and i just
decided to update one of older guitars (its a Hondo). The guitar
is good except for the sound...a lot of people are suprised at the
feel of the guitar (it being a Hondo and all). Well the problem
is, is that it has two humbuckers in it and i want to put 3 single
coils. The body is routed out to handle both combinations soooo
i was wondering if SD puts out a pick guard already set up that
i could just plop in, or if there is an easy way to make one to
plop in?
Dave
|
31.16 | SD, no...DM, yes | ERASER::BUCKLEY | Gertrude Stein Method of Improvisation | Mon Feb 17 1986 09:10 | 9 |
| Re -.1: To my knowledge...SD does not markety a prewired pickguard
arrangement, they're basically a replacement pickup co. and that's
about all. However, DiMarzio, which has expanded it's product line
into the parts area not only sells strange pickguards and other
accessories, but sells prewired pickup arrangements. They go from
about $120.00 to about $250.00 depending on your selection. Check
them out, they're pretty good also.
WJB
|
31.17 | yet another question | ASGNQH::LINGLEY | Curiosity didn't kill the cat, Knowledge did... | Mon Feb 17 1986 09:30 | 14 |
| re -.1:
Thanks...Could I get a good David Gilmour sound out of these
(the ones for $120)? I also saw in Daddy's junky music a while
a strat pickguard all wired up for $100. This would probably give
me a better sound than the Hondo, but i'm not sure if that's a good
price.
And last but not least (yes i'm full of questions) is there a humbucker
out there that could give a single coil sound that i could just
replace in my Hondo pickguard? I have a Les Paul as my main guitar
and the thing is incredible, but i can't get that Strat sound out
of it..."I want the best of both worlds" I guess....
Dave L.
|
31.18 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Mon Feb 17 1986 17:33 | 5 |
| My understanding is that Gilmore uses custom rewound pickups..of
course it's Semour Duncan that rewinds them.....they'll do yours
too for $35 each.....2 month turnaround...
dave
|
31.19 | single coil sound from a Gibson | ELWOOD::WALTON | some people call me... Tim! | Tue Feb 18 1986 07:28 | 11 |
| re .17
I had a Gibson SG once with Carvin humbuckers (the ones with 11
poles), which had a coil-splitter switch for each pickup. It
didn't sound *exactly* like a Strat, but it wasn't bad. I think
there are other people beside Carvin that make pickups that can
be split like that. I have no idea how much they cost, they were
in the guitar when I got it.
Tim
|
31.20 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Wed Feb 19 1986 07:56 | 6 |
| almost all pickup manufacturers make humbuckers that "split coil"
ths does require the addition of a switch though...but you can get
volume controls that have the switch built in, activated by pulling
up on the knob....washburn uses this on their guitars....
dave
|
31.21 | X2N | CAM1::ZNAMIEROWSKI | Marmalade, I like Marmalade... | Thu Feb 20 1986 14:59 | 11 |
| I just picked up a DiMarzio X2N double coil...Having it installed
this weekend. I don't trust my own work. After buying it, i went
home and just popped it in connected to a 3/4 inch jack, kind of
an EVH job (the BARE minimum). That sonofabit*h Screams! really
nice pickup. Does anyone know about ESP pickups? they look exactly
like X2N's except the esp has a chrome bar across the poles and
the X2N has black matte. tried an ESP Mirage Deluxe down at Wurlitzers
through their 3 grand setup (Drool, Drool) and boy, any giutar through
that wails!
Regards
|
31.22 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Mon Apr 20 1987 14:46 | 25 |
| Well this may be the wrong place to ask but...
Do any of you technical wizards knwo what size the tone control
capacitor in a strat is? I've been experiencing some problems with
my tone control (boy is this hard to believe) and at some time in
the past changed it with a cap that is unmarked. I want to get back
to the original value if possible.
If any of you tech wizards want to theorize at bit here's the problem:
The tone control quit working....no prob...oepn guitar check switch,
pots ect...everything looks good change cap...tone control works...for
a while....quits again...check eveything out...change cap....works
for a while and quits again....I brought one of the "failing" caps
to work and checked it on a bridge capacitance meter..the cap is
good....but if I change it it fixes the problem for a short period
of time (short= 1min to 24 hours). I do know how to solder and am
sure that all solder joints, switch, pots etc are good....
I guess next I'll try replacing the switch because I don't know
what else to do...any and all suggestions will be received with
pleasure...thanks
dave the confused strat tech
|
31.23 | I've got a schematic | FROST::SIMON | Mister Diddy Wah Diddy? | Tue Apr 21 1987 10:10 | 6 |
|
I can look at the schematic tonight and get back to you tomorrow,
that is if no one else beat me to it.
-gary
|
31.24 | after a little research... | FROST::SIMON | Mister Diddy Wah Diddy? | Wed Apr 22 1987 19:53 | 32 |
|
re -.2:
It sounds like the caps end up shorting out or are too low of
a value and get worse with time?? Dunno for sure. What the
cap on a tone control does is pass the highs to ground (or
filter them out). Without the cap you would not be able to
drain the highs off, so you would always have a trebly sound.
If the cap was replaced with a solid wire, you would get no
sound out of the pickup at all as it would act as a short to
ground, which is kind of what a very low cap value would do.
Generally, most Fender guitars used .05 to .1 microfarad caps for
there tone controls. You could try some experimenting as long
as you stay in a certain range of capacitance. Some basic rules:
- The value of the cap determines the amount of treble cut
o A high value cap, e.g., .05 uF can produce a bassier
tone....less treble, than a lower value, e.g., .02 uF.
- Generally, single coil pickups use a .02 uF and dual coil use
.05 uF. (FENDER being an exception)
Basses use .05 and even .08.
I'd suggest you try the .05 uF to start. If it sounds too bassy
back off to a .02 uF.
Hope this helps and good luck....
-gary
|
31.25 | Mystery Pickups on new SG's | CARLIN::LAMBERT | There must be higher love... | Wed Apr 29 1987 13:48 | 10 |
| hi,
i've just aquired a new gibson SG, (Jr. i think, but it may be a special,
definitely not a standard) anyhow, it has 2 dual coil pickups without the
soapbar covers. the dealer, Mr. C's in marlboro, said they are called
"dirty finger" pickups - there is no name stamped upon them that i can
find. Is anyone out there familiar with this who could tell me exactly
what i've got for pickups?
-perplexed-max-
|
31.26 | | IOSG::CREASY | | Thu Apr 30 1987 06:27 | 15 |
| RE:.25
They could well be "Dirty Fingers" pickups. That is the name of
one type of pickup made by Gibson. Gibson make a number
of different pickups (25+? he guessed...) which then get scattered
(hopefully not at random) among their different models.
My Explorer, being 2nd generation, has got Dirty Fingers pickups
on it - they don't have covers on, and are mildly "hot" [though
nowhere close to a real "hot" pickup].
Unfortunately, I know nothing much about them. Ho hum
Nick
|
31.27 | Soapbar pickups?? | ERASER::BUCKLEY | I Might Lie... | Thu Apr 30 1987 11:03 | 12 |
| Re: .25
As I may or may not recall, weren't those pickups called `Soapbar'
pickups? I remember Gibson re-issuing the Dirty Fingers around
`81, but I though they were the standard size replacement pickup,
like that which would go into a les paul custom, or the like.
FYI, Dimarzio makes a hotter version of this pickup in the original
size, so no modification to the instrument is required, however,
I kind of like the sound of the original Gibson pickups, they're
kinda neat.
-Bj
|
31.28 | new EMG pickups? | BAXTA::BOTTOM_DAVID | Not so famous rock star | Wed Dec 09 1987 12:56 | 8 |
| Has anyone had the occasion to hear the EMG select series of pickups.
They're not the standart EMG's with preamps, but a normal high
impedance type wound pickup with all of the good and bad that goes
with that type of design...I got a catalog where they are dirt
cheap...$17 and change for single coil and $21 and change for
humbuckers....if they are good this is an excellant value...
dave
|
31.29 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | She was a mommar... | Wed Dec 23 1987 07:33 | 17 |
| I tried a kramer that had EMG select pickups in it last night....these
are great pickups! They are not active like the pickups that made
EMG famous. However the single coil pickups were very hot had good
tone and virtually no noise. I don't know if they are a stacked
type single coil but they would compare favorably with my duncan
stacks...
I played through a Boogie .50 cal amp...amazing how much distortion
that thing has...personally I found it very difficult to get a decent
sound out of it at all...it was very muddy...sustain yes, clearity
no...
dave
ps: the emgs are cheap through stewart mcdonalds
|
31.30 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | semi smokin' mama... | Mon Jan 18 1988 12:58 | 12 |
| I recently re did the pickup scheme on my strat, I put a gibson
('66 Es-335 humbucker) in the front and two EMG Select pickups in
the back. The selectys are nice pickups, they are as quiet as a
stack or humbucker (but are not a humbucking pickup, what good
shielding will do!) they have a mellow sound, possibly due to the
alinco magnets in part, they are as hot as the gibson humbucker,
but may actually have slightly less high end (this may be the way
I'm using the tone control on just those two pickups). All in all
for the $17.50 each I paid for them they are an excellant choice
for replacement pickups.
dbII
|
31.31 | any hazards I should know about? | HAZEL::STARR | You ain't nothin' but fine, fine, fine! | Wed Jul 20 1988 17:45 | 10 |
| I know to a degree I am rehashing an old topic here, but can someone
answer a simple question? I am going to replace the pickups in my
'57 reissue Strat. From all that I have heard and read, I am going to
put two Seymour Duncans in (one will be the Hot Stack), and one of
the EMG Selects. Does anybody know of any reason not to mix and match like
this, or anything I should watch out for? Or just any comments in
general about this combination?
Adv<thanks>ance
Alan S.
|
31.32 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | behind blues eyes... | Fri Jul 29 1988 11:59 | 6 |
| The only thing that might happen is this: you may get an 'out
of phase' sound if the EMG's and the Duncan's were wound in different
directions...easy to correct, just switch the two wires around on
one of the pickups...
dbII
|
31.33 | thanx | POWER::STARR | aka HAZEL::STARR | Fri Jul 29 1988 14:47 | 6 |
| dbII,
Thanks for that info. That is the kind of thing that I didn't
know about!
Alan S.
|
31.34 | Select by EMG | JGO::OPERATOR | | Wed Oct 05 1988 12:13 | 8 |
| I have just fitted my Tokai Vintage Strat copy with the Select (by
EMG) pickups and am very pleased with the sound. My problem with
the old pickups was that they were very thin and brittle sounding.
The Select pickups are so cheap beacause they are mass produced
in Korea. So if, like me, you can't afford the the excellence of
the real thing, then these will probally do credit to your sound.
Regards from a low paid Operator!
|
31.35 | Alembics? | SCOMAN::WCLARK | I need a dump truck to unload my head | Fri Oct 28 1988 14:05 | 7 |
| Does anybody out there have a Strat with Alembic Stratoblasters
in it? I've heard them a few times and thought they sounded
great (better than EMG's), but Fitchburg Music told they were
asking $220 for a set of 3. How much more is this than the EMG's?
Is this out of line for thse pickups?
thanks - Dave
|
31.36 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Everyday I got the blues | Mon Oct 31 1988 06:21 | 5 |
| This is definatley more than EMG's and more than Duncans etc.
I dunno much about alembec pickups.
dbii
|
31.37 | Maybe??? | VIDEO::BUSENBARK | | Mon Oct 31 1988 08:38 | 9 |
| Emg's retail price from what I've seen are about $180. Daddy's
quoted me a price of $130 for Emg-SA's. I know someone who has a
an Alembic guitar and I would say he has no edge at all if those
are the "blasters" plus very poor tone quality IMO. His Fender Strat+
just blows the alembic away. Tewksbury music has a set of EMG's
in a Fender Strat for demo. Check them out.
Rick
|
31.38 | Just a thot | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Dracula Sucks | Mon Oct 31 1988 10:46 | 5 |
| Perhaps the EMGs you didn't like had a low battery? I've never
heard Strat pickups that I liked better, but I've never heard the
Alembics.
Greg
|
31.39 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | slimy weather! | Tue Jan 03 1989 08:14 | 8 |
| I recently put a semour duncan Jeff Beck humbucker in my strat (bridge
position) this thing screams! Great sustain (a la Santanna and look
ma no compressor), heavy high harmonics and a strong powerful output.
highly recommended to one and all...I also put in two hot stacks.
I personally love these pickups, I must I own 6 of them, great single
coil sound, no hum and high output.
dbii
|
31.40 | any hacking? | FROST::SIMON | Birds can't row boats | Tue Jan 03 1989 10:45 | 15 |
|
re: .39
> I recently put a semour duncan Jeff Beck humbucker in my strat (bridge
> position) this thing screams!
Dave,
Did you need to make any modifications, or did it just slide in
where the stock pickup was?
-gary
|
31.41 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | slimy weather! | Tue Jan 03 1989 10:56 | 22 |
| The humbucker is a standard size humbucker (say gibson style) so
routing was necessary at one time, I was replacing an older
unidentified humbucker with the Jeff Beck. You also need a pickguard
that takes a humbucker (roughly $20 in shops). the stacks are a stacked
humbucker, essentially 2 coils mounted abover each other, they give a
strat 'single coil' sound but don't hum at all, regardless of the
amoung of gain you use, I find them to be better than most stock
humbuckers. They have a very bright 'strat' sound without the noise
and hum that is so annoying.
Prices run about $60-65 for duncan pickups, at least these pickups.
They are available in several colors. I special ordered the JB in
black (black plasitc coil forms) as they normally come in cream,
the stacks come in three colors, white, black or maroon. Default
is maroon and the other colors are again special order, I ordered
black, but in this case the color is a cover that is removable.
Duncan blew the order and shipped maroon but replaced them for free
with black ones...
another satisfied customer
dbii
|
31.42 | pearly gates | RICKS::CALCAGNI | | Tue Jan 03 1989 12:58 | 5 |
| just curious, has anyone had any experience with Seymour Duncan
"Pearly Gates" humbuckers? These are named after Billy Gibbons
old Les Paul.
/rick
|
31.43 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | just cold weather! | Fri Jan 06 1989 10:30 | 9 |
| an amusing thing I heard in a shop a little while ago about waxing
pickups.
"you MUST use beeswax to wax pickups as it is a softer wax and
therefore is more reasonant and warm sounding"
chuckle
dbii
|
31.44 | I'm sorry | RICKS::CALCAGNI | | Fri Jan 06 1989 13:21 | 1 |
| hey, I tried a beeswax equipped guitar and it was a real honey :-)
|
31.45 | Sorry, I couldn't resist either! | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Fri Jan 06 1989 13:31 | 5 |
|
Does that mean it sounded so sweet that you're gonna stick with
it?
Mike D
|
31.46 | It's Friday! Let's waste some disk space :-) | PNO::HEISER | Noter of a Higher Authority | Fri Jan 06 1989 16:02 | 3 |
| Or stick to it :-)
Mike
|
31.47 | groan | WELMTS::GREENB | Unzipping the abstract | Mon Jan 09 1989 08:34 | 8 |
| Yeah, as used by Sting
Sting.......bee.........?
Aw, never mind
Bob
|
31.48 | A true but unrelated story..... | TARKIN::TTESTA | You load 16 tons, whattaya get... | Mon Jan 09 1989 17:05 | 9 |
| Overheard while shopping for car stereo speakers.
Woman: Why can't I use a small set of home stereo speakers in my
car? They seem to sound better and are less expensive!
Salesman: Cars use DC...Home speakers are wired for AC.
Me: Ha HA HA Ha HA HA Guffaw, choke gasp.....
Ha HA HA Ha HA HA Ha HA HA Ha HA HA Ha HA HA
|
31.49 | Prices on Fender-Lace Sensors | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Tue Sep 19 1989 11:35 | 12 |
|
How about comparing prices on Fender-Lace Sensors??? I'm really
looking at maybe building another Strat (one without a humbucker) and
I'd like to use those "gold 50's sounding" jobs that Fender talks about
in their ads..... actually, I'd really like to buy one of those EC
models and be done with it, but won't ever be able to afford one...
Regards,
Steve
|
31.50 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Rock and Roll doctor | Tue Sep 19 1989 12:30 | 4 |
| Victor Litz has them for $49.95, all models
dbii
|
31.51 | Lace Sensors... | SALEM::DWATKINS | Caught in the Crossfire... | Wed Sep 20 1989 10:56 | 9 |
| Hey dbii, who/what is "Victor Litz"? Also, how many different models
of LACE SENSORS are there? I have seen silver,gold, and blue,
is there more? Anybody know what the differences are? I know the
blue ones are hotter than the gold ones.
Thanks,
Don
|
31.52 | Lace sensor update | SALEM::DWATKINS | Caught in the Crossfire... | Wed Sep 20 1989 14:06 | 20 |
| I went out at lunch and have the answer to my own question. Lace
sensors come in four flavors...
Gold "50's Strat"
Silver "Fat Strat"
Blue "Classic Humbucker"
Red "Mega Output"
I got the price of $45 for the gold and $50 for all the other ones.
I was also told that they should be able to get the wiring diagram
and parts for the TBX� tone control system. More things to think
about...
Don
|
31.53 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Rock and Roll doctor | Wed Sep 20 1989 16:58 | 10 |
| Victor Litz:
305 N. Frederik Ave.
Gaithersburg, Md. 20877
1-800-828-5518 (credit card orders)
1-301-948-7478 (product info)
enjoy
dbii
|
31.54 | pickup questions | JURAN::CLARK | are you, uh, experienced? | Mon Oct 09 1989 11:19 | 15 |
| 2 questions about pickups:
1. I did an partly acoustic gig last weekend. I had one of those
pickups you fit into the soundhole of my acoustic. I was having
a problem in that the pickup seemed to be amplifying the unwound
(high E and B) strings well, but not the wound strings. I had never
noticed this problem before and was wondering if it was because
the wound strings were bronze instead of steel (I used to just
use electric strings on my acoustic and haven't had cause to
amplify it for about 8 years). Anybody know about this?
2. What's your 'rule of thumb' about how close to set the pickups
to the strings (on an electric).
thanks - Dave
|
31.55 | two answers | TOOK::SUDAMA | Living is easy with eyes closed... | Mon Oct 09 1989 13:49 | 34 |
| <<< Note 31.54 by JURAN::CLARK "are you, uh, experienced?" >>>
-< pickup questions >-
1. I did an partly acoustic gig last weekend. I had one of those
pickups you fit into the soundhole of my acoustic. I was having
a problem in that the pickup seemed to be amplifying the unwound
(high E and B) strings well, but not the wound strings. I had never
noticed this problem before and was wondering if it was because
the wound strings were bronze instead of steel (I used to just
use electric strings on my acoustic and haven't had cause to
amplify it for about 8 years). Anybody know about this?
> The unwound strings do tend to pickup better than the wound ones. I
> believe this is because the materials commonly used to wind acoustic
> strings (bronze, brass, etc) do not have the same magnetic properties
> as those used to wind electric strings. Some pickups (like my
> Seymour-Duncan) are set up spefically to compensate for this. If your
> pickup has adjustable pole-pieces under each string, crank the ones
> under the high strings down, the others up. If not, try setting the
> pickup in the sound hole such that the upper side is closer to the
> strings than the lower side.
2. What's your 'rule of thumb' about how close to set the pickups
to the strings (on an electric).
> My rule of thumb is, as close as I can get them before the strings
> touch when fretted at the base of the neck (actually, I'd back off
> just a little from this so as not to affect the intonation of the
> strings). I have humbuckers, and I want to get as much output from
> them as possible. I don't play a strat, but the ones I've seen don't
> seem to have the pickups set as high. Is there some reason for this?
- Ram
|
31.56 | one answer | JURAN::CLARK | wanna lick off my toad, man? | Mon Oct 09 1989 14:37 | 12 |
| re .-1
thanks, Ram!
the reason Strats don't have the pickups up as high is that the
more focussed magnetic field of the single coil pickups can
actually impede the free vibration of the strings ifthe pickup
is too close. Also, it causes intonation problems (ever notice
how the low E strings on a lot of Strats have intonation prob-
lems?)
-Dave
|
31.57 | SD bridge vs. neck | STAR::TPROULX | | Fri Oct 27 1989 14:57 | 10 |
| I bought a '59 humbucker that I want to put in the bridge
position on my guitar, but I didn't realize until after
I bought it that it's intended for the neck position.
Does anyone know what the difference between a Seymour
Duncan pickup designed for the neck position and one
designed for the bridge position? Do the bridge position
models have hotter output? Thanks,
-Tom
|
31.58 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Rock and Roll doctor | Mon Oct 30 1989 10:24 | 7 |
| According to DUncan's literature the neck vs. bridge pickups are wound slightly
different so that the output levels balance when used together.
Me I'd try it in the position you want, doubtful that you'll notice that much
of a difference
dbii
|
31.59 | | CHEFS::DALLISON | Screaming blues-o-mania | Tue Oct 31 1989 08:21 | 11 |
|
Arrrgghhh...
I've got two EMG 85's on order, but it looks like you guys Stateside
are being gready (8*>) with them coz my store has run out, and so has
the UK distributer! Its been about 3 weeks and they reckon it will
be a month before EMG send them over the pond 8^(
Come on guys, send them over here ! 8^)
-Tony
|
31.60 | You mean a 2x4 with pickups on it? | LEDS::ORSI | You little booger machines | Tue Oct 31 1989 12:59 | 19 |
|
I'm one person who likes the sound of weak pickups. I've
got a '57 Strat reissue that isn't even as loud as my
buddys' '70something Strat. I just crank up the amp and
get the funkiest sound out of the thing. I like the sound
of the whole guitar, not just the pickups. IMO, the hotter
the pickup, the less it sounds like the guitar, and more
like just the pickup. None 'o that increased sensitivity,
more sustain, less noise, more dynamic range, no squeal or
microphone feedback at any volume pickups for me, thanks.
I like my guitars to sound good.
Neal
|
31.61 | opinions, please... | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Fractured Fairy Tales | Mon Nov 27 1989 11:21 | 10 |
| A couple of questions on Seymour Duncan's....
1. anyone tried the "Hot Rails" yet? If so, how 'bout an opinion...
2. Are the SD Hot Rails supposed to be equal to a "PAF" style humbucker
in tone (fatness) and response (hotness). I really don't want to
cut my strat, but I would like at least one pickup with a fatter
tone.
Steve
|
31.62 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Rock and Roll doctor | Mon Nov 27 1989 12:05 | 7 |
| I dunno about the hot rails but the quarter pounder is fatter and hotter than
a stock strat pickup by a mile...
FWIW you can always trade up/equal on Duncan's within 30 days...
dbii
|
31.63 | huh? | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Fractured Fairy Tales | Mon Nov 27 1989 13:28 | 6 |
| Dave,
"quarter pounder"?? Are you serious? I don't see that model available
in my catalog....do you know the model # ?
Steve
|
31.64 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Rock and Roll doctor | Tue Nov 28 1989 07:15 | 6 |
| I have an older catalog and it's listed as a SSL-4 or SSL-4T (Tapped). Perhaps
they no longer make them (too bad, they were powerful) also listed is the
quarter pound staggered SSL-7 & SSL-7T, staggered magnets to get a more classic
strat sound (FWIW)
dbii
|
31.65 | Seymour MacDuncan... | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Fractured Fairy Tales | Tue Nov 28 1989 08:31 | 7 |
| thanks, Dave
I think those model numbers are in my catalog, I just don't remember any
nicknames like Quarter Pounder or Mac Pickup. Sheesh, I just got the
urge for some MacNuggetts........8^)
Steve
|
31.66 | hmmmm... | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Fractured Fairy Tales | Tue Nov 28 1989 11:24 | 10 |
| More data...
Just called the guy I bought my Strat from (Clarke Music/Atlanta). He
says that the SHR-1 (SD Hot Rails) is actually two side by side coils
in a single coil size pickup. He claims it is a paint peeler, but also
says it will not authentically emulate a full size side by side
humbucker. Since I do not want to cut on my axe, I think the Hot Rails
will be my first experiment. I'll post a response here when (and if)
I take the plunge.
Steve
|
31.67 | | ASAHI::COOPER | In pumps life that I must feel | Tue Nov 28 1989 15:47 | 4 |
| I think you should get a Jackson j200 pickup for it just for some
light hearted gnads bustin'
;^)
|
31.68 | Gibson tone is what I wanted.... | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Fractured Fairy Tales | Wed Nov 29 1989 08:29 | 4 |
| I solved my pickup/tone problem.....I swapped my strat for a Les Paul
deluxe.....it worked!
Steve
|
31.69 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Rock and Roll doctor | Thu Nov 30 1989 08:19 | 5 |
| Gee I once swapped a beat LP custom for an immaculate blonde strat and then
swapped the strat for a tele thinline that I still have...but I always seem
to play my strat (other strat)
dbii
|
31.70 | | VLNVAX::ALECLAIRE | | Sun Dec 24 1989 18:23 | 7 |
| Has anyone had the opportunity to give a listen to the Ultrasonic
pickups?
These resemble expensive EMG's and are advertised as having a flat
frequncy response.
Thanks. Andrew.
|
31.71 | My tone sucks without them! | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Soul on Ice | Wed Dec 27 1989 12:58 | 5 |
| Never actually heard them, but they had this really stupid advertizing
campaign using the slogan "Suck Tone". I saw some on sale really cheap
at my local store, I guess nobody wants that "suck tone"... 8^)
Greg
|
31.72 | | PNO::HEISER | It's another boy/girl?? | Thu Dec 28 1989 23:00 | 8 |
| I've heard them on a Zion Radicaster that I tried in LA last month. I
tried the same guitar with EMGs right afterwards and they do sound
similar.
Many of the Zion Radicaster players that I know only use Ultrasonics,
EMGs, or Andersons.
Mike
|
31.73 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Just say no: The Edward's Dam! | Fri Dec 29 1989 09:16 | 3 |
| Did anyone ever try a hot rails?
dbii thinking of getting one....
|
31.74 | Nobody wants to *WHAT* ? | CHEFS::DALLISON | With your G-string tuned to A | Sun Dec 31 1989 15:57 | 6 |
|
I beg your pardon Greg ?? Suck Tone ??
Don't even think about trying dude 8^)
-Tony (Tone)
|
31.75 | ;^) | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Soul on Ice | Tue Jan 02 1990 20:18 | 3 |
| Funny guy, Tony... It was *their* stupid advertizing slogan.
Greg (who don't suck nothin')
|
31.76 | | CHEFS::DALLISON | With your G-string tuned to A | Thu Jan 04 1990 07:39 | 1 |
| 8^)
|
31.77 | Maybe?????? | CMBOOT::EVANS | if you don't C# you'll Bb | Thu Jan 04 1990 09:52 | 7 |
|
Just a thought but perhaps the term "suck tone" is being used to
describe a similarity to the fat sound one gets when drawing (or sucking)
on a harmonica rather than sexually assaulting our Mr. Dallison :-).
Cheers
Pete.
|
31.78 | I don't need *that* kind of help | CSC32::G_HOUSE | I got 'happy feet'! | Fri Jan 05 1990 21:11 | 11 |
| Actually, I think it was supposed to mean that the pickups would "suck
every bit of tone you could get out of your guitar". But you only read
that in the small print on the side of the box, or inside the brochure.
The outside just says "SUCK TONE".
My tone sucks enough without help from bad pickups... ;^)
Don't take that as bash on that brand, 'cause I've never heard them.
That slogan slays me though! 8^)
Greg
|
31.79 | Just another thing to spend money on... | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Tue Feb 06 1990 10:49 | 20 |
|
Mates, I just installed Fender-Lace sensors in my Stew-Mac Strat
and I really like them alot. Much less clacky than my re-issue
pick-ups and nice blues tone and sustain... So I'd vote for them, but
what I really wanted to share was:
With each sensor came a little user brochure which includes
standard Strat wiring diagrams (yawn) and a technical explanation of
the sensor and it's parts....... DUH..... Is Biflux Dual Fields? Micro
Matrix Comb?? Radiant Filed Barrier (I know, I know, must be for
50-60hz hum cancelling) but gee.. aren't these cool high-tech terms???
Anyone who would like a copy of this tech note can send me mail
including your mail stop and I'll shoot one off to you.
Regards,
Steve
|
31.80 | which ones??? | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Tue Feb 06 1990 11:32 | 4 |
| Which Lace Sensor's silver or gold label...?
Rick
|
31.81 | $$$? | CSC32::G_HOUSE | It's just a jump to the left... | Tue Feb 06 1990 14:30 | 3 |
| The Lace Sensors sound like nice pickups. What are they going for?
Greg
|
31.82 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Tue Feb 06 1990 15:53 | 10 |
| I've seen mail order (VIctor LItz) as low as $39.95 but usually about $50 per
for lace sensors...
I prefer to spend the extra $15 and get Duncan stacks and skip the hum, yes
Virginia, Lace sensors hum, not as bad as stock fender single coils but
they still hum....
stacks don't hum
dbii
|
31.83 | Let's see there's gold and red and blue and.. ummm | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Tue Feb 06 1990 16:40 | 16 |
|
Good question.. I got the gold one's, and with my cool RFI setup I
don't have much hum.. course I play in my basement at low volume
<grin>.. but that's gonna change pretty damn soon...
I paid $60 for mine at my local Fender dealer they were marked
79.95, but like dbii said, I'm sure they are half that mail order or at
the big city stores.... they do have one hell of a lot more sustain
than I expected.. I almost went with a blue one in the bridge position,
but I wasn't sure how well it would balance with the gold AND... I've
NEVER owned any kind of Strat style guitar with three of the same
pickups in it... thought I'd try it for a change.
Hey, dbii how bout a nice clacky re-issue pickup fer your lead
II??? Hmmmmmm???
|
31.84 | | GIANTS::KEANE | Brian - DECforms | Wed Feb 07 1990 09:21 | 7 |
| What is the distinction between the various colors of Lace Sensors?
I've been considering a mod to my Fernandes strat copy to get a more "Gibson" type
sound (not too good on the terminology, I'm afraid!), but want something I can just
"pop" in. Do any of the Lace Sensors fit the bill?
Brian
|
31.85 | blue = humbucker | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Let the Big dog eat | Wed Feb 07 1990 09:42 | 8 |
| RE: .84
I *think* the blue lace sensors are billed as "classic humbuckers". I
have never road tested the blue ones, tho......
FWIW,
Steve
|
31.86 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Wed Feb 07 1990 10:16 | 4 |
| re: reissues for my Lead...ack barf! it's got two duncan hot stacks and a
jeff beck humbucker, why would I want to ruin it?
dbii
|
31.87 | Gold, Blue, Red... | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Wed Feb 07 1990 13:11 | 19 |
|
Grin... OK dbii, stick with yer "sissy" hot-stacks... Hee hee..
Here's the breakout as I understand it...
Gold Sensors.. classic 50s strat sound (I own em' I love em')
Blue Sensors.. clasic humbucking.. higher output.. sweeter distortion
Red.... Megadeath hyper output (although, I've never met or heard him
play, these sound like "coop" style pickups) the hottest Fender
offers..
I play blues (barely) and I am really loving these gold things they
are cool.. I replaced my re-issues with them and they work great...
Steve
|
31.88 | see note 31.52 | SALEM::DWATKINS | Things got bad and Things got worse | Wed Feb 07 1990 13:42 | 1 |
|
|
31.89 | | GIANTS::KEANE | Brian - DECforms | Thu Feb 08 1990 09:37 | 6 |
| So, If I were to pick up one of these blue babys for my pseudo-strat, what would be
the best place to install it (which pickup to replace)? Do the humbuckers sound better
in one particular place, or is it just a matter of preference?
Thanks again,
Brian
|
31.90 | Lead pos. | SALEM::DWATKINS | Things got bad and Things got worse | Thu Feb 08 1990 10:14 | 5 |
| I would put a blue L.S. in the bridge position, if I bought one,
JMHO.
Don
|
31.91 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Thu Feb 08 1990 10:26 | 3 |
|
Yeah, me too Don.
|
31.92 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Thu Feb 08 1990 11:56 | 9 |
| Yo Grieve drag your panzy home made guitar and those wimpy pickups and your
barely adequate amp over to my studio and I'll give you a lesson on real
guitar sound courtsey of those "sissy" stacks and a rivera...
yuk yuk yuk
dbii many times :-)
ps: Have I been reading too many KH replies lately?
|
31.93 | Oh Yeah.. well wait til I tell Mom!!! | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Fri Feb 09 1990 10:51 | 12 |
|
Gee, Davey boy, I didn't know that you were so intimidated by my
stuff (Amp: Fender Super 60, designed by Paul Rivera, Pickups:
Fender/Lace Sensors, designed by some unknown musical instrument
company in , California) hee hee... Good thing your chops still blow
me away...
Steve
wimpy home made guitar owner <sigh>
|
31.94 | Duncanized into a Rivera, and quadraverbed to a higher plane | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Fri Feb 09 1990 11:58 | 8 |
| Face it Steve, you're intimidated by my collection of awesome guitars, mostly
equipped with Duncan's....but hey...everybody needs to be in awe of something...
:-)
yuk yuk yuk
dbii
|
31.95 | no Seymour they really are nice! | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Fri Feb 09 1990 13:53 | 9 |
| I also installed 3"gold" Lace Sensors in my Strat and I found they
are very nice pickup's with lots of bluesy tone and great sounds.
And no noise.... :^) Sure beats the price of a Strat +(except
for the JB/SRV CD) Whimpy ... no way!
I heard the "blue and silver" Lace also. The humbucker is pretty
standard sounding.
Rick
|
31.96 | Gold vs Silver??? | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Mon Feb 12 1990 12:51 | 13 |
|
Rick, I've heard the gold (they're in my Strat) and the Blue (in a
whatchamacallit... deluxe strat plus, or something like that) but I
haven't heard the silver... How do they compare to the gold one's?? If
you were playing blues, would you want the gold or silver??? Thanks
RE: .-2, DBII, yer too much in AWE of yourself, Dude <grin>
Regards,
Steve
|
31.97 | New England Blues? or Chicago Blues? | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Mon Feb 12 1990 14:58 | 17 |
| Well Steve, after using the gold's this weekend playing I'd say
don't bother with the silvers. but here's my best description
The Silver Lace Sensors,are duller with less bite and really
not real stratish if you ask me. They are also less crisp,They seemed to
be more of a rythmn guitar sound to my ear.(rounder sounding) I had heard
them in a Strat + deluxe,but I wonder if they would cut through. They have
more of a humbucker sound to me. They also kinda remind me of a set of the
EMG SA's too.
For blues and rock I think the gold Lace sensors really are
your best bet,and much better sounding than HS2's,I like there tone over SD
Pro alinico's also....
Even the bass player in the band noticed a big difference
in tone. Clean and distorted....for some of the blues tunes we were doing.
Rick
|
31.98 | Blue = Sucky Tone | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Mon Feb 19 1990 09:37 | 12 |
|
Yeah, Rick, I tried a blue one in my strat in the lead position and
I wasn't pleased at all.... It sounds somewhere between the Gold
sensor and a decent humbucker... real nasal.. yuch. I hate it for
blues and I'm going to put my gold back in.. the good news is (I guess)
that it distorts really well.. so for folks who like to make em scream,
it might be OK, but overall the tone sucked.
Steve
|
31.99 | Pickup Depth/Hight | NEEPS::IRVINE | Never underestimate, the power of human stupidity | Mon Feb 19 1990 12:17 | 12 |
| Here's a little question for the LES Paul people out there...
What depth would you set your pickups from your string, when fretted
at the 12th position? At the moment I have mines set something
like... 1�5 mm for high E on the bridge pickup down to about 2�5
mm on low E, and for the neck pickup 2�5mm for high E & 3�5mm for
low E.
Anyone got any differing settings, and why you set them at any
particular depth?
Bob
|
31.100 | golden blues.... | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Thu Feb 22 1990 16:48 | 5 |
| Steve,you might want to try it in the bridge,but the gold's
just have so much more character in all the different switch
position's,It takes alot these day's for me to be happy with tone....
Play dem.. blues...boy.
|
31.101 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | If all else fails, take a nap... | Mon Feb 26 1990 12:32 | 8 |
|
Yayus!! Holy shit, what a difference, I replaced my bogus, Blue
for a Gold and am now emitting killer tones, the FCC should license
these things... now I don't have any excuse, but to learn to play the
thing.
|
31.102 | It's ok now... | RAVEN1::DANDREA | Frog lickers unite! | Wed Feb 28 1990 09:44 | 11 |
| FYI,
I was asking about microphonic pickups somewhere in this note. Since I
went to Kitty Hawk M3 head and a rather large 2x12 cab, my feedback
squeal is gone. I have a Les Paul Deluxe (baby humbuckers) that was
"squealing" at me constantly thru a small Peavey combo....but no more!
I think it was treble induced. This new cab has great mid and bass
response.
Steve D.
|
31.103 | Opinions Sought | VAXWRK::SAKELARIS | | Thu Apr 19 1990 12:37 | 25 |
| Anybody have an opinion about the following situation?
I have a Strat. I like the sound of it real well except that for my
taste, the bridge pickup was just too thin. I replaced it with a
DiMarzio HS-2, "Compared to a stock single coil pickup, the HS-2 has a
little more output..." I play my guitar alternatley between no
distortion, some distortion, and heavey distortion, and as I said I
like the sound real well. Now the problem comes where I'm playing with
a group that requires a heavey metal sound for every song. (the
other guitar player has one of those damn signal processors - he keeps
it full blast everything, maybe to get his money's worth)
In this situation, The stock Strat pickups just don't make it - way too
thin. I end up only using the replaced bridge pickup. What I'd like to
do is replace the other pickups with probably the HS-3, which has a
higher output than the HS-2. the question I pose to you folks is how
would you configure the two HS-3's and the HS-2. Would you for example
move the HS-2 to the middle, or to the neck, or at all? I know some of
you will shout about Duncans and I'm not opposed to them, tho I do
prefer Dimarzio if for no other reason than I can keep the white color
by using same. In either case tho, what I'd really like a sampling of
opinion about is where to put the more powerful pickups when I get
them?
"sakman"
|
31.104 | Blow off more Dimarzios! | ICS::BUCKLEY | Cheesy oblique-motion tapping puke! | Thu Apr 19 1990 13:10 | 22 |
| Yo, Sakman, check this out dude...
The HS-3's aren't everything they could, or SHOULD be!
If I were you (I'm not, but...), I'd blow of the HS-3s and go with
the Seymour Duncan Hot Rails!!!
I'd configure it like this:
||bridge|| Lead Middle Rhythm ||neck||
Hot HS-2 Hot
Rail Rail
Check them out...they have MUCH more gain and sustain than the HS-3s,
AND, they clean up when you turn the volume down. I seriously think
if you go with the HS-3s you'll be bummin. They have a nice sound,
but they STILL SOUND like a Single coil (cuz they are, really) ...
the Hot Rails are actually TRUE Humbuckers!
Fud 4 thought,
B.
|
31.105 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Thu Apr 19 1990 13:11 | 6 |
| Yo again,
The hot rails is Duncan's hottest pickup made according to the literature I
have
dbii
|
31.106 | Best of both worlds, almost ... | ASAHI::SCARY | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Thu Apr 19 1990 13:32 | 6 |
| My Strat has the Dimarzio Shock Wave system on it, which allows you to
keep the "Strat" sound or use a boost switch to make it scream.
Although this set up won't blister you like the humbucker in my Kramer,
it's still pretty hot if you've got the OD really cranked on your amp.
Scary (who'd love to find some knobs that go to "11")
|
31.107 | pickups? | ROYALT::BUSENBARK | | Thu Apr 19 1990 14:06 | 22 |
|
I'd also consider using a SD Hotrail in the bridge position,put a
hs2 in the middle since you have it already and consider putting in a coil
cutting switch for the bridge pu. However HS2's and 3's were pretty bland
sound wise. And as was previously stated I didn't notice a big sound change.
I was dissapointed....I was told the HS2 is the closest to vintage. It really
depends what kind of tone/sound you want when using the neck position pickup
as to what I'd install.
Consider that what you may need is not an increase in gain,but a
tone change. I found that in playing with a group that single coil pickups
"cut" better than humbuckers even the stacked flavor. There seems to be an
interaction with what amp your using also and it's preamp gain....An hs 2
in the bridge just didn't cut it for what you are tryin to do.....as I
remember....
BTW,I was also told that Hot rail's do not have a good clean sound.
..but sound good distorted...the coil cutting switch may help this....
and as is mentioned previously.....
You can also consider the Dimarzio SW system pickup's if you don't
want to buy SD's. You can buy the individual pickup's without the preamp...
Rick
|
31.108 | Help choosing PU | MFGMEM::RATTEY | | Thu Apr 19 1990 14:30 | 12 |
|
I'd like to put new pickups on my ES-335, At this time I'm considering
Seymour Duncan's - looking at the "59-Humbuckers" and the
"Pearly Gates" not sure if I should go with the same for bridge and
neck position or maybe get the PG"s for the bridge and the '59's for
the neck.
Anyone have any comments on either of these.
How do you think they would sound on a 335 ??
Ray.
|
31.109 | Hot Rails Pricing (et al) | VAXWRK::SAKELARIS | | Thu Apr 19 1990 15:18 | 13 |
| Ok Dave, I just checked out the price of the Hot Rail at Music
Emporium. They're gettin' $73.50 for 'em. When I told him I just bought
the HS-2 and wondered about returning it in favor of the Hot Rails, the
dude laughed in my face. Ok, in my ear actually.
Anybody out there in reader land
got a better place to buy? I live in Merrimack and work in Marlboro.
BTW, I just ordered 4 6L6s' for $6.99 each at Prosound in Colorado as
suggested by a reply in the TUBES note.
Anyway, one other question, if I go with SDHR's any reason I can't
paint the plastic white? Seems to me there's no reason but I've learned
alot reading about all y'all's experiences. I figured I'd ask.
|
31.110 | Get them white | SALEM::DWATKINS | Oh No, now you've done it! | Thu Apr 19 1990 15:21 | 6 |
| Can't you order them in white? I though you could order SD pickups
in black, white, or cream?
Don
|
31.111 | MacDuff's | MPGS::MIKRUT | Intentionally left blank | Thu Apr 19 1990 15:23 | 8 |
| RE: .109
Try MacDuff's out in Shrewsbury. I checked out prices of Seymour
Duncan all over the state, and found them to be the cheapest.
Their number is: (508) 752-2704
Mike
|
31.112 | depends on model | MPGS::MIKRUT | Intentionally left blank | Thu Apr 19 1990 15:25 | 8 |
| re: .110
I think it depends on what model your getting. My Classic Stacks
are white and look just like the originals. I think the Hot Stacks
are maroon-like in color and don't have the individual pole pieces,
but instead, one continuous magnetic band.
Mike
|
31.113 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Thu Apr 19 1990 15:35 | 12 |
| re: Duncan colors
They advertise that they come in about 50 different colors, I orderded a
Jeff Beck in solid black about a year ago with no problem, the problem is
usually when your local dealer has them in a different color..
re: '59 I put one in a bandmate's Ed-34x (the 'stereo' thing that looks like
a 335). You could not tell it from the stock pickup (the one we replaced
had given up the ghost) sound wise so if you're looking to change the
sound you might try something else...
dbii
|
31.114 | | CHEFS::DALLISON | The return of the bald avenger | Fri Apr 20 1990 07:29 | 9 |
|
I'm thinking about putting a hotrails in the neck position of
Frank (as in Frankenstein).
I've got an EMG 85 in the bridge position and at present have a coil
tap humbucker in the neck, but I still find that I can't get the
scream I want.
Anybody think that and EMG 85/SDHR is a bad configuration??
|
31.115 | I got a SD 1/4 Pounder | VAXWRK::SAKELARIS | | Fri Apr 20 1990 11:46 | 20 |
| Well, after getting the feedback that I did yesterday, I stopped in on
the music store on the way home ( Daddy's). They just so happened to
have a used SD 1/4 pounder for $29. I bought it and installed it last
night in the bridge position, after moving the DiMarzio HS-2 that I had
previously installed there into the neck position.
Havent't tried it out yet on my amp, but I did try it thru my Rockman.
Sounded pretty damn good but now the middle pickup, which is still the
original, sounds OBVIOUSLY too thin by comparison to the other two
heavier pickups. My wife just frowned at me when I mentioned it to her
last light; she knows whats next.
Now, for those of you in the know, or who have literature, what is a
1/4 pounder by comparison to other pickups, ie Hot Rails or DiMarzio
HS-3s?
Sakman
Oh, btw - the 1/4 Pounder I got is black and it doesn't look bad in my
Cream/White Strat. It does look BAAADD though!
|
31.116 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Fri Apr 20 1990 11:54 | 7 |
| re: wives
yah mine got disgusted all over again yesterday when the testerossa that I
didn't meniton to her showed up....hee hee it's gig money you can't say anything
dear...
dbii
|
31.117 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Fri Apr 20 1990 14:35 | 5 |
| Rut-Roh !
Whats she gonna say when the bay shows up ??
jc (Who is about to send DB a message)
|
31.118 | Thought for the future | ICS::BUCKLEY | Cheesy oblique-motion tapping puke! | Fri Apr 20 1990 14:37 | 2 |
| What she gonna say when the SP-1000 shows up?
|
31.119 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Fri Apr 20 1990 14:49 | 10 |
| I actually discussed the SP-1000 with her...she pointedly reminded me of the
folowing statement:
"gee this Rivera is so hot I don't anticipate requiring anything else"
well wash my mouf out wif soap!
Hey you gotta be flexable in this life eh?
dbii quatro/testerossa rack mount madness puke
|
31.121 | Who me ? Fickle ?? | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Fri Apr 20 1990 15:18 | 17 |
| Matrimony:
2.5 months and counting...
Oh boy, I can't wait !
The one thing I can say in defense of my appetite for guitar goodies:
I earn enough with the band that I break even...My rack is paid for
in blood sweat and tears (to coin a phrase)...
Of course she DID buy my MP1 for me at Xmas time, so...
She still wonders why I want a Gibson, when I always say I don't
like them. Hey, gotta keep 'em guessin; right boize ? ;)
jc (Dual-Charvel/Ibanez-Metaltronix-ADA-Rocktron-Kitty-Marshall-GK Puke)
|
31.122 | | UPWARD::HEISER | If Dora Plays Like Me Alls Lost | Fri Apr 20 1990 15:49 | 3 |
| Coop is smart! He got all of his gear first, then got married!
"honey? can we split up for a year and reunite next year?"
|
31.123 | Husband is to guitars | SMURF::BENNETT | Delicate sound of Frying Tolex | Fri Apr 20 1990 16:19 | 2 |
|
as Wife is to shoes.
|
31.124 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Fri Apr 20 1990 17:43 | 8 |
| RE: .122
Agagagagagagagaaaa...
Well, hopefully (!) I can still play with the ring on my finger...I hear
it's tuff with the attached ball and chain.
;)
|
31.125 | | UPWARD::HEISER | If Dora Plays Like Me Alls Lost | Fri Apr 20 1990 18:34 | 1 |
| Quick! Someone send -1 to CJ before he deletes it!
|
31.126 | The classic "double ring ceremony" ! | ASAHI::SCARY | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Sat Apr 21 1990 14:10 | 5 |
| The ring on your finger (in my case ...) gives you a more "solid"
feeling on your hand. It's the ring through your nose that might
hamper your chops ! 8^)
Scary
|
31.127 | Hmmm, something to think about? | CSC32::H_SO | If you like the shoe, then wear it! | Sat Apr 21 1990 16:23 | 39 |
|
Hmmm, may be I should get married...
Put up with the constant nagging...
Many questions asked about why I spend so much money in guitar...
Put up with their credit card bills from shoe stores...
Curfews set forth...
"You're never at home with me!"
Put up with the in-laws...
That once a month grand old time...
NAAWWWWWWW! ];->
J-Dot who_likes_his_women_at_arm's_length
|
31.128 | my wife has given up! | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Mon Apr 23 1990 11:39 | 5 |
| if the ring is constructed properly you can use it for slide
chuckle
dbii
|
31.129 | | TCC::COOPER | MIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack puke | Mon Apr 23 1990 11:50 | 4 |
| I hear ya... I keep telling her that "this'll be the last piece of equipment
I'll need"...Right. Now hun, about those 4x10's we saw...<slap!>
jc
|
31.130 | Ah...the married life... ;^( | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Greg House - DTN 523-2722 | Mon Apr 23 1990 13:43 | 16 |
| re:.126
> The ring on your finger (in my case ...) gives you a more "solid"
> feeling on your hand. It's the ring through your nose that might
> hamper your chops ! 8^)
Makes *my* ring finger feel like it's getting tendonitis. But if I suggested
playing without it...
That nose ring has been hell on my chops, fer sure.
re: .127
Yep, you've about hit on all the high points.
Greg (who always wondered if it was just him)
|
31.131 | | IOENG::JWILLIAMS | Welcome to the Bush League | Wed Apr 25 1990 15:18 | 7 |
| Actually, My girlfriend ( > 5 yrs ) took the news that I had bought a
brand spanking new GP-16 w/foot controller pretty well. She did not,
however, buy the " last piece of equipment " fable.
John.
" But, honey, what's wrong with the couch we have now? "
|
31.132 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Tue Jul 10 1990 15:34 | 16 |
| SOrt of a mini-review of the Duncan Alinco II tele pickups
They're great. I always wondered how Jeff Beck got that super crunchy/growling
tone out of his tele's. I think that he must use these pickups since I can
now get the sound perfectly through my Quattro (curnch mode) and using
these tele pickups.
These are the first "single coil" pickups that I've bought in years that
weren't in fact, stacks. I used a heavy aluminum foil tape to line the
body cavities on the guitar and made extra effort to make the guitar
shielded as well as I could and it's 95% as "clean" as a stacked humbucker.
For anyone looking for a crystal clear, semi hot tele replacement pickup
this may be just what the doctor ordered.
dbii
|
31.133 | Does this configuration make sense? | XERO::ARNOLD | Read my quips. | Fri Jul 13 1990 16:20 | 29 |
| db:
I know you got the Alnico II pickups for your tele but I'e been
tinking of changing the pickups in my Schecter Strat. So... any idea
how the strat Alnico IIs would compare to, say, the Fender Lace golds?
I've yet to find a guitar with Strat Alnico IIs in them to try and any
of your observations would be welcome.
Also, I've been thinking of the following combination(s). Can
anyone guess as to how it would sound? (I can't stand having to buy
pickups before I know how well they will work together.)
Here's what I've been thinking...
Neck: Fender Lace Gold (or Seymour Duncan Alnico II)
Middle: Fender Lave Gold (or Seymour Duncan Alnico II)
Bridge: Seymour Duncan JB (with a switch to tap the JB down
to single coil for a thinner sound).
The reason I've been thinking about this is that my Schecter Strat has
a 2 single-coil with bridge humbucker already installed and the
humbucker already has a coil-tap switch. I'm looking for the same
versatility but with better pickups.
ideas?
- John -
|
31.134 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Mon Jul 16 1990 15:09 | 13 |
| Well I haven't heard the duncan strat alinco's but, I'm considering
getting some to re-outfit my strat....they also make a humbucker
Asking me is easy: get the duncan's
I tried lace sensors (not in my guitars but on strat plus's) and they're
ok pickups, better than a stock fender, but I can't really compare them to
a strat alinco,
I really like the bridge pickup on my tele. It growls it howls and it screams.
I highly recommend that one to any tele owner.
dbii
|
31.135 | Humbucker on Tele question.. | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Jonathan Livingston Cat Barf.. | Tue Jul 17 1990 10:40 | 39 |
|
Jeeze, I swapped my es335 copy for a new Fender Standard Tele. I
like everything about it except that the strings don't go through the
body, but I may modify it so they do (like the American Standard Teles)
anyway, I got it so that I could put a humbucker in the neck position
(like my new hero Sen�r Twelve Bar has on his Tele Deluxe)... Here's
the pickup question:
I know that the neck pickup needs to be directly over the second
harmonic that exists there, but for a humbucker, how would I locate the
pickup?
A. with the primary coil directly under the harmonic
B. with the secondary coil directly under the harmonic
C. with the harmonic directly over the gap between the
two coils????
Graphically speaking:
| harmonic
A. | | | humbucker
| harmonic
B. | | | humbucker
| harmonic
C. | | | humbucker
|
31.136 | My choice | ICS::BUCKLEY | Cocked & Loaded! | Tue Jul 17 1990 10:58 | 3 |
| -1
I'd go with "A".
|
31.137 | My thoughts...don't take as Gospel | CMBOOT::EVANS | if you don't C# you'll Bb | Tue Jul 17 1990 11:22 | 11 |
|
From my rusty knowlege of physics the place where a harmonic occurrs is
called a node & it doesn't move ( in reality it will but not so much as
the rest of the string). The humbucker has two coils wound anti-phase
so common signals get cancelled. Seems logical to me to line the
harmonic up with the gap between the coils. I can't see any reason for
doing otherwise...but then again music ain't always logical.
Cheers
Pete.
|
31.138 | FWIW... | ICS::BUCKLEY | Cocked & Loaded! | Tue Jul 17 1990 11:34 | 2 |
| ANy guitar I've ever seen has had the major (screw) pole pieces line up
on said-node harmonics!
|
31.139 | Shoot all guitar designers!!! | CMBOOT::EVANS | if you don't C# you'll Bb | Tue Jul 17 1990 11:41 | 8 |
|
Fine!
I can't help it if guitars defy the laws of physics :-) Most things in
my world do but I put that down to God having a little joke with me!
Cheers
Pete.
|
31.140 | Unless You Only Play Open Strings | AQUA::ROST | Get up and get hip to the trip | Tue Jul 17 1990 14:19 | 9 |
| Re: .137
The flaw in your thinking is that the nodes move based on which note
you are fretting! For example, the octave harmonic you get at the 12th
fret of the open string is always found 12 frets above where you are
currently fretting. So you can't actually avoid not having *some* node
eventually be above the pickup.
Brian
|
31.141 | I'll be quiet now. | CMBOOT::EVANS | if you don't C# you'll Bb | Thu Jul 19 1990 11:38 | 6 |
|
re -1 is perfectly true.
Cheers
Pete.
|
31.142 | DiMarzio pickup | BIOMIC::LANE | Engineerus Digitalis | Fri Aug 03 1990 07:40 | 10 |
| I've just been down to my local music shop to try out an ADA MP-1
(Which I will have next pay day....).one of the guitars I tried it with
was the Ibanez JEM777 (Steve Vai design) which sounded HOT. The hum
buckers on these are made by DiMarzio, who also sell them. I have one
on order, Will let you know what it sounds like.
Roger
P.S My brother-in-law has one of Gary Moore's Jacksons which is fitted
with EMG's and it sounds Wonderfull.
|
31.143 | | VLNVAX::ALECLAIRE | | Sun Aug 12 1990 19:29 | 5 |
| Has anyone heard the Schaller '59 pickups sold by Stewart-Macdonald's?
How do they compare to the Seymour Duncan '59 pickups?
They are about 1/2 the price.
|
31.144 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | The sea refuses no river.... | Mon Aug 13 1990 09:54 | 8 |
| According to Stewie-mac's the shallers are not potted!
Major reason not to buy unless you want to do them yourself.
All Duncan's are factory potted, for that matter any decent factory pickup
is.
dbii
|
31.145 | | VLNVAX::ALECLAIRE | | Mon Aug 13 1990 10:30 | 1 |
| What does potted mean?
|
31.146 | stop that squealin' | OTOA01::ELLACOTT | non_teenage_mutant_ninja_bassist | Mon Aug 13 1990 11:55 | 8 |
| Potted means dipped in a substance that coats the coil windings
so that they don't rattle and produce microphonic feedback (high
squealy stuff). Popular substances for pickups are wax shellac and
sometimes epoxy. Epoxy is often used to hide trade secrets
and is a little tricky for the average do it yourselfer, as it tends
to expand or contract while it hardens, not good for those tiny
wire in your pickup
fje
|
31.147 | | VLNVAX::ALECLAIRE | | Mon Aug 13 1990 12:06 | 1 |
| OK, thanks
|
31.148 | Not too great . . . | CRBOSS::BEFUMO | IRAQnophobia | Mon Aug 13 1990 12:55 | 14 |
| Though I haven't heard the duncan '59s, I do have one Shaller from SM,
and am not all that impressed with it. Umpteen years ago I just HAD to
have a PAF in my Hagstrom Swede, so I put a Gibson PAF in the bridge
position, expecting it to blow away the Swede neck pick up. To my
surprise, it sounded just about the same as what was there, so I never
bothered relacing the neck PU until the mounting ring broke last year.
Hag PUs are sized slightly differently from other humbuckings, so I had
to replace the pick up. I bought the Shaller, and it really doesn't
sound anywhere near as good as the Gibson or the Hagstrom pickups. To
my ear it sounds muddy and lacks definition. It's not SO bad that
I'm going to rush right out and replace it, but it's definitely not
what I'd consider a performance enhancement.
Joe
|
31.149 | | KIDVAX::ALECLAIRE | | Mon Aug 13 1990 13:35 | 9 |
| OK Joe, that's the kind of info I wanted.
My kramer baretta has gone through an EMG, now has a SD Invader ( with
huge pole magnets ) and I've been thinking of putting in a '59 type,
as it comes stock with it. The invader is a high output passive type,
and I can't get a clean sound.
Anyone familiar with any other PAF types, as from DiMarzio?
They seem to have some nice pickups, I have some in a BCRich but
they're a bit high output := distorted.
|
31.150 | Cost of Fender Strat Ppickups | WJOUSM::MAY | IT'S LIKE THE SAME, ONLY DIFFERENT! | Mon Sep 10 1990 17:02 | 5 |
| Does anyone know how much it costs to purchase original equipment
Fender Stratocaster pickups??
Thanks
Bruce
|
31.151 | yep! | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | OK...Who turned on the lights? | Tue Sep 11 1990 14:55 | 5 |
|
About $25-$30 a piece!
lace sensors are around $49 for the gold
Steve
|
31.152 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Tue Sep 11 1990 22:58 | 3 |
| Hmmm .. that's not too bad ! Might grab a lace for my bridge pu !
Scary
|
31.153 | | RAVEN1::BLAIR | Practice makes you tired | Wed Sep 12 1990 11:20 | 5 |
|
Dumb question. Are Lace sensors like double coils in that they are quiet
(ie; humbucking)? Seems like the neck p/u would be a good place for one...
-pb
|
31.154 | Nope single coils with field barriers! | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | OK...Who turned on the lights? | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:04 | 12 |
|
Negatory, good buddy.. they are a whole new breed of single coil
pickup that accomplish the task using lower level magnetic fields. I
love the sound of them in my strat... The blue ones DO sound like a
humbucker, but they're single coil too.. Dr. Greve has spoken, deal
with it dudes... Hey Pat, you want I should send you a little booklet
that talks all about them??
Steve
|
31.155 | go for the gold | STAR::TPROULX | | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:06 | 11 |
| re .153
The lace sensors are like humbuckers in the sense that
they're very quiet compared to regular single coils.
However, lace sensors aren't humbuckers, and operate on a
different priciple that I don't really understand.
If you're near a Fender dealer, give 'em a try. I think
they're pretty neat.
-Tom
|
31.156 | | RAVEN1::BLAIR | Practice makes you tired | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:55 | 6 |
|
Steve, thanks, but you don't need to send me a booklet (a copy
would be cool tho'!) If it ain't too much trouble...GSO1/E5.
Also, thanks for the clarification. They do sound cool.
-pat
|
31.157 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | The sea refuses no river.... | Wed Sep 12 1990 13:24 | 4 |
| ...and compared to either the ducan or dimarzio stacks aren't a hum-free
either....
dbii
|
31.158 | GP comes through again! | COOKIE::G_HOUSE | Give a little | Wed Sep 12 1990 13:36 | 11 |
| Yo Pat,
Check out the latest edition of Guitar Player magazine for a
description of the design of the Lace Sensor pickups and why they are
able to get good output with lower magnetic fields (essentually because
they use a whole bunch of little fields as opposed to just a few big
ones). I think it was in either the "Questions" column, or the
"Repairs" column, but don't remember for sure. Pretty interesting
reading!
Greg
|
31.159 | Why for eh ? | 33864::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Wed Sep 12 1990 13:56 | 6 |
| I don't get you Fender types...
Y'all rave about "The Strat Sound" then buy new pickups.
What gives ?
jc (This isn't a slam, but curiousity gets the better of me)
|
31.160 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | OK...Who turned on the lights? | Wed Sep 12 1990 14:39 | 5 |
|
Mine came with em' Coop... [;^) <-- flat top, gray-haired old
fart blues guitar student...
|
31.161 | | RAVEN1::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Wed Sep 12 1990 14:43 | 5 |
| >flat top, gray-haired old fart blues guitar student...
With a chainsaw
;)
|
31.162 | Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa | ICS::BUCKLEY | This One's for the Girls! | Wed Sep 12 1990 14:49 | 5 |
| A fellow notyer in here (he knows who he is) has a strat with stock
pickups that ROOOL (yes, both the guitar and pickups rool!). I'd
KILL to have a strat like that...it was perfect in every respect!!!
Buck, who always finds the sh*tty strats ;^(
|
31.163 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | OK...Who turned on the lights? | Wed Sep 12 1990 14:52 | 4 |
|
.156 On it's way dude...
|
31.164 | | RAVEN1::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Wed Sep 12 1990 15:02 | 13 |
| RE: Buck
I hear ya... Every strat must be different, cuz I've had two
in the past that s*cked; one I even 'metaled out' by putting
humbuckers and a real wiggle stick on it...
Then again, the ones Jerry and Pat have are REAL nice...
I'd like to have a 'real nice one' but it's tough to justify
the bucks (no pun) to the wife when I run around telling her
I don't like strats...
Ho Hum.
|
31.165 | Droooooool | CSC32::H_SO | Hyundai insider: I drive a Chevy | Wed Sep 12 1990 22:14 | 5 |
|
Will Collum gets seriously killer sound outta his Strat=>Boogie
set up!!!
J.
|
31.166 | | RAVEN1::BLAIR | Practice makes you tired | Thu Sep 13 1990 13:54 | 7 |
|
re:158
Yeah, I read that article, but it was hard to hear how quiet they
are, ya know?
;^)
|
31.167 | | RAVEN1::BLAIR | Practice makes you tired | Thu Sep 13 1990 13:59 | 5 |
|
Coop, you were definitely off kilter as a young'n. Didn't you
tell me you also filled the F holes of an ES with f*cking Bondo!
You poor, sick laddie. Oh yeah, Clapton uses the Laces, so it's
must be A-O-Tay!
|
31.168 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | The sea refuses no river.... | Thu Sep 13 1990 14:21 | 5 |
| re: why do we go on about that strat sound and then change the pickups?
we're guitarists
dbii
|
31.169 | | RAVEN1::COOPER | MIDI rack puke | Fri Sep 14 1990 01:09 | 15 |
| RE: .168
Dave, your killin' me. What a perfect answer ! Agagagagagagaga...
RE: Pat. Yep. I was a sick pup. Had a nice gibson that squeeled. I
wished I'd bought a gibson with no F-holes, so I filled 'em up with
Bondo; Sounded pretty good! Ah but alas, I dumped it a few weeks later
for an Ibanez Blazer with a Whammy bar (! that was the cats meow !).
Should of seen the Kent LP copy that I had - Tried to blow it up with
a king-sized-home-made M80 (about ten of them!). ;)
Anyhow, I've mellowed into the laid back stuff now... Metallica,
Anthrax ya know...Old foggie music. ;)
jc (Who plays NICE music...sometimes)
|
31.170 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | OK...Who turned on the lights? | Fri Sep 14 1990 10:22 | 6 |
|
Hey, dbii!!! What did the guitar player get on his IQ test??
Saliva...
|
31.171 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | The sea refuses no river.... | Fri Sep 14 1990 12:02 | 3 |
| Hey Dr. Frets (AKA the Greve unit) I wouldn't want to brag! :-)
dbii
|
31.172 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | OK...Who turned on the lights? | Fri Sep 14 1990 16:29 | 5 |
|
Rats... I meant drummer... shoot, I thought I was in the DRUMS
notesfile.
|
31.173 | Changing Stock Strat PU's | DUGGAN::SAKELARIS | | Mon Sep 17 1990 11:08 | 21 |
| Why do Strat owners want to change the sound? Well, speaking for
myself, I'd say that part of the reason was experimental. Another part
was because of the type of music I'm doing, which requires a fatter,
more full bodied sound. Just dickin around at home I wouldn't suggest
to anybody that they should change the pickups. If I played country and
western, or even jazz, I wouldn't change 'em.
I changed mine to a DiMarzio in the neck and a S.D 1/4 pounder in the
bridge. I still have the original in the middle, but rarely use it
since the difference is quite noticeable. All things considered, when
I made the change, I was playing on an old Fender Super Six. Now, I use a
Fender "twin" with a really great overdrive channel. With this kind of
amp, and others like Boogies, KH, and a Marshall turned up, the
difference between the pickups becomes much less apparent. I'll be
changing the middle pickup soon only to compensate for the volume
differential when I switch to it. Alternatively, I've been thinking of
wiring the switch so that all three pickups are on when the switch is
in the middle position. Any thoughts on this out there in reader land?
"sakman"
|
31.174 | Oh yeah, listen to him... | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | OK...Who turned on the lights? | Mon Sep 17 1990 14:14 | 15 |
|
SAKMAN!!!! Yayus!!! I like what you said about experimenting!
Stop!!! Dont' rewire the middle.. rewire a "hot switch" from the neck
position pickup to the output. Then you can turn that baby on when
you're at the detent just above bridge for all three pickups AND...
you can turn it on in the bridge position to get just neck and bridge..
I did this on a strat copy that I had and I loved both tones.. haven't
got the bags yet to start cutting up my new Strat.. but I'm getting
there... Yer, gonna like this switch combination!!! If you want a
little diagram let me know..
Regards,
Steve
|
31.175 | | DUGGAN::SAKELARIS | | Mon Sep 17 1990 15:36 | 16 |
| Hi Steve,
If you could post a diagram, or mail it to me, I'd be greatful. From
reading your last, I can't quite envision what you suggest. When I turn
on the neck pickup, it is wired to the output. Not sure what you mean.
I'm thinking that perhaps you mean a separate switch to select the neck
pickup when the bridge is on. What would that do as opposed to using
the middle for all three?
Oh, I just drew a diagram of what I was thinking for wiring three
pickups together in the middle position. I see now why it's not done at
the factory ... It can't be done without losing the adjacent two
positions. The three middle switch positions would be the same pickup
configuration. Well I'll be dipped in sh*t and called stinky. That's no
good. Might try your configuration Steve.
"sakman"
|
31.176 | Yepper... | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | OK...Who turned on the lights? | Tue Sep 18 1990 10:49 | 33 |
|
Yeah I'll be happy to send you a diagram, sacky boy... Maybe the
switch (yep a separate one... I'd use a pull-up tone pot if it were my
guit) better way to describe this switch is to call it a "Rhythm Pickup
On No matter what switch"... Picture this, a switch that puts Mr. Neck
pickup to the output no matter where the 5po is.. The 5po still selects
it bu the "hot switch" over rides it. So...
Standard Strat Would Be:
1 Bridge
2 Bridge + Middle
3 Middle
4 Middle + Neck
5 Neck
So, if I switch NECK on while I'm in Position 1... I get NECK and
BRIDGE... AND if I'm in position 2 and I switch NECK on I'd get ALL
THREE... Here's a quick drawing...
Hot Lead from Neck Pickup / Volume Pot
||{ -------------------------- O ---------------- /\/\/\ ------- Out
SPST ^ Jack
|
-----
Regards,
Steve
Shrewd Guitar stuff trader...
|
31.177 | | DUGGAN::SAKELARIS | | Tue Sep 18 1990 11:18 | 11 |
| Steve...My Man...good idea! I'm gonna be installing a new pickup soon,
and when I settle on one I'll try this mod. In worst case, it doesn't
require any cutting on the guitar, only drilling a small hole in the
Pickguard above the volume and tone control cavity. In fact, hell it
seems to me that since I never use the tone controls (always fully up)
I could sacrifice one of em and wire the other as a master tone
control.
Thanks again,
"sakman"
|
31.178 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | OK...Who turned on the lights? | Tue Sep 18 1990 15:28 | 6 |
|
Cool.. lemme knmow how you make out.. Lemme know if you need more
help... lemme know if you ned a place to store your TWIN.. (heh, heh,
jest kiddin')
|
31.179 | Fender Lace Sensor Installed | DUGGAN::SAKELARIS | | Thu Oct 04 1990 15:21 | 38 |
| I have installed a Fender Lace Sensor - Red ("HOT") in the bridge
position of one of my Strats. Now the guitar has a Seymore Duncan 1/4
pounder in the neck, a DiMarzio HS 2 in the middle, and this FLS as stated.
I'm not sure I like the FLS but let me explain and solicit opinion.
Firstly, the FLS although called "hot" seems any thing but. I like to
position pickups close as close to the string as possible without it
interfering with the string. In setting up the SD and DiM. the FLS
doesn't seem to have as much gain. I've got the FLS only microns away
from the string and although slight, perhaps even negligible, the gain
seems to be less than the other pickups that are positioned further way
from the string.
Other than that I like the sound, especially when I use it clean. Truth
be known, I think I may be expecting the FLS to sound like my other
Strat which has a DiMarzio Super distortion humbucker (dual coil)
bridge pickup. It doesn't, and that may be good. Rather than two guitars
that have the same sound for one of the pickups, I have two guitars for
two different sounds. But it may be bad since underneath it all maybe I
want to hear what I expected - a hot pickup. I jus dunno.
The other thing youse guys might like to know about this guitar with
three different pickups and types; surprisingly, the DiMarzio is by far
the quietest. I expected the FLS to be because of it's operating
principle. I held the guitar up to the top of the amp and tested the
hum that the pickups "heard". The DiMarzio was dead quiet, the other
two about even. Not a problem for me though. If I played in a place with
a lot of EMI, I'd just use the other guitar with the two dual coils.
So here I am, happy with the the FLS, but I don't know yet if I'm
satisfied. I'm wondering if I'd be happier with the DiM. HS-3 or the
SD Hot Rails. One other thing. Prior to the FLS, the SD 1/4 pounder
occupied the bridge position. I thought that it was a bit "shrill" for
my taste and used the DiM. which was in the neck position. Now, I
absoluletly LOVE the SD in the neck. The DiM in the middle makes a fine
complement.
"sakman" (I'll try the mod you suggested next Steve)
|
31.180 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | Jane sez `I'm gonna kick tomorrow' | Thu Oct 04 1990 15:37 | 4 |
| -1
FYI, the HS-3 don't have that much gain either...its just very
midrangy! Go for a Duncan is you want true gain!
|
31.181 | Give it some room.... | SMURF::BENNETT | No Reflection, No Profile | Tue Oct 09 1990 12:34 | 5 |
|
You may have suboptimized the location of that pickup. I think
of the fields around a pickup as being like a flame - it's never
hottest near the base. Back the pickup off a bit so that the string
is in the field and not under it.
|
31.182 | | DUGGAN::SAKELARIS | | Tue Oct 09 1990 13:45 | 17 |
| re .179
Well here it is a week later since I installed the FLS. I'm still
reserved about comparing it in favor of any other, but I will tell you
that my Strat is one you'd like to hear if you're considering replacing
the stock pickups. The remarkable thing is the tone of the guitar when
played thru a Fender amp clean. Notes just sort of "pop".
I've always liked Les Pauls and thought of it as "the" guitar.
Nowadays, I can't see any reason not to get a Strat. There's just so
much you can do to 'em and with 'em. After all these years of pickin'
and owning guitars, I think I've finally found the one that's gonna
stay with me until I can't (or don't want to) play anymore. As I think
back, I don't know why I never tried a Strat. It's not that I didn't
like them (e.g. Ibanez - nothing against them, I just don't
like 'em), I was just ambivalent about 'em.
"sakman"
|
31.183 | RG550s Rooooooooool!!! | ICS::BUCKLEY | Get the FUNK out! | Tue Oct 09 1990 14:18 | 6 |
| -1
Don't like Ibanez???
Duuuude, we gotta talk!
;^)
|
31.184 | | BOSOX::MCLEMENT | 2 necks are better than 1 | Wed Oct 24 1990 11:11 | 9 |
|
DYLIW you get a yell from the dock saying "Mark, your box is here!"
and when you open the box you see a F Spaced,Green MEGADRIVE
for your RG550 and a F Spaced,White DOUBLE-WHAMMY for your
Double-Neck. B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)
B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)B^)
Mark_who_is_feeling_a_little_bit_under_the_weather_so_I_
better_go_home_and_get_some_rest_. ;^)
|
31.185 | | FREEBE::REAUME | I know trouble cuz I am | Wed Oct 24 1990 11:46 | 5 |
|
The Megadrive is a *great* bridge p/u. That's what is screaming
in my B.C. Rich ST-III. ENJOY!!!!
-BooM-
|
31.186 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | All 4 1, and 1 4 all together | Wed Oct 24 1990 12:36 | 8 |
| Dudes...
I looking into replaceing the lead and bridge pickup in my Ibanez.
Do you recommend a Double Whammy, PAF Pro, Fred, or MEGAdrive?
Buck, requesting sound comments on all.
PS - I have the X2N in my Jackson...too much gain for me!
|
31.187 | FWIW | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Shread melodic | Wed Oct 24 1990 14:28 | 7 |
| I like the Megadrive in my Ibanez Les Paul copy quite a lot too. It
does have significantly higher output then the stock one though, so if
you're not looking for gain, it might be too much.
I've never tried any of the others.
Greg
|
31.188 | | DUGGAN::SAKELARIS | | Wed Oct 24 1990 14:45 | 13 |
| Buckster,
Now this might not be easy for you to describe or me to understand, but
how does a guitar sound with a pickup with too much gain? I have DiMarzio
Super Distortion HB'ers in one of my Strats. It sounds really great, but
when I'm facing the amp and I'm right up close (like to adjust a setting),
the pickup will squeal if I'm using the distortion channel with the gain
set about 6. I tried to dampen it by placing foam underneath but that was
no real help. I can control it by backing off the guitar's volume but I
like the sound better when the guitar is up all the way. Is this an example
of too much gain?
"sakman"
|
31.189 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | All 4 1, and 1 4 all together | Wed Oct 24 1990 14:46 | 4 |
| -1
Yeah. I mean, I play LOUD, and it's harder to control that microphonic
feedback when its up there.
|
31.190 | | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Wed Oct 24 1990 15:17 | 5 |
| Now that you guys are finally discussing it...
So how do you you control it ala Satch's intro to "Flying..."?
Mike
|
31.191 | ;^) | ICS::BUCKLEY | All 4 1, and 1 4 all together | Wed Oct 24 1990 15:33 | 3 |
| -1
It's done with mirrors!
|
31.192 | | DUGGAN::SAKELARIS | | Wed Oct 24 1990 15:38 | 12 |
| Hey Mikey,
I don't know the tune "Flying..." off the top of my head. I've only heard
it once or twice. But I'm sure that's not microphonic feedback you hear
but rather harmonic feedback. Harmonic feedback has the strings resonating
at a frequency (-ies) that is reinforced (as opposed to decay) by the
frequencies emanating from the speaker. This means you're hearing the
strings which is desireable instead of the pickup. Harmonic feedback is
controlled by tone, volume, proximity an angle to the speaker. Hendrix
was the real musical pioneer of this technique, as far as I know he
invented it. Santana refined it. Vai, Satch, et al have applied it to
great use I think.
|
31.193 | | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:00 | 5 |
| Sakman, yeah that what he did. I saw him last week and he does his own
variation on the Hendrix trick. What I want to know is how they can
control it, alter the pitch, etc. once it starts feeding back!
Mike
|
31.194 | intuative? | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vote Yes on 3 | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:20 | 4 |
| The easiest way to alter the pitch is by bending strings, and using
the whammy
Mark
|
31.195 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | All 4 1, and 1 4 all together | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:30 | 4 |
| Actually, if you use the whammy, it alters the string in the flux
field, and decreses the feedback signal. I'd say direction to the
speakers and using your tone control would affect the harmonics
sounding!
|
31.196 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Reelect nobody! | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:56 | 5 |
| If dimarzio's propaganda is true then I'd go twith the paf pro (I'm
currently considering ordering an f-spaced pro myself) since I like the
tone of it's many users, Vai, Satch etc...
dbii
|
31.197 | f-what? | GOES11::G_HOUSE | But this amp goes to 11 | Wed Oct 24 1990 17:13 | 3 |
| What is "f-spaced"? Fender spaced? I'm not familiar with the term.
Greg
|
31.198 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | All 4 1, and 1 4 all together | Wed Oct 24 1990 17:15 | 3 |
| Yeah, what;s with this F-spaced stuff?
B (whos spaced!)
|
31.199 | FWIW | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Wed Oct 24 1990 17:19 | 5 |
| My Ibanez RG550 has the lastest DiMarzio "sound alikes", known as the
V2 series humbuckers. They scream! Supposedly they have a higher output
than the DiMarzios.
Mike
|
31.200 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | All 4 1, and 1 4 all together | Wed Oct 24 1990 17:23 | 2 |
| Last source *I* heard from, Dimarzio was winding the Ibanez pickups
for them!
|
31.201 | Some info on pickups used in Ibanez guitars | GOES11::G_HOUSE | But this amp goes to 11 | Wed Oct 24 1990 17:42 | 45 |
| From the Ibanez catalog...
PAF Pro humbucking pickup
Based on the classic PAF, but with increased power and string balance.
FRED humbucking pickup
Using the PAF Pro as a model, DiMarzio added midrange body without
sacrificing treble response. A solid, open-sounding puckup with some
unusual overtones and harmonics.
IBZ/USA F1 pickups produce vintage lead sound wilke adding increased
output and midrange punch.
IBZ C2
The C2 vertical humbucker in the neck position delivers a hot, full
fhythm tone with rich harmonics and clarity.
IBZ F2
A medium high output humbucker with emphasis on bass and midrange
frequencies but with no sacrifice of dynamic range.
IBZ/USA F1 humbucking pickups preserve the vintage lead sound while
adding increased output and midrange punch.
IBZ/USA C1 vertical humbucking pickups deliver single coil tone without
the noise and hum.
IBZ/USA F3
With its blistering output, smooth high end and clean, mean lows, the
IBZ/USA F3 pickup is perfect for sledgehammer lead impact with endless
sustain.
The IBZ/USA F4 is based on DiMarzio's PAF Pro but features an extended
lower frequency response and slightly less highs.
The only comment about the V1, S1, and V2 pickups is "RG500 guitars now
feature completely new American designed pickups wound specifically for
the RG500 series."
Greg
|
31.202 | | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Wed Oct 24 1990 18:30 | 11 |
| Re: FRED
It has some interesting out-of-phase characteristics too!
I remember reading the Satch & Vai interview in Guitar World this
summer when they were talking about FRED. I guess DiMarzio created a
bunch of different prototypes, all named after Flinstones characters.
FRED was the one Satch liked. Vai said, "Let me know when you get to
Bam Bam!" ;-)
Mike
|
31.203 | Silly, I know... | ICS::BUCKLEY | All 4 1, and 1 4 all together | Wed Oct 24 1990 20:06 | 3 |
| Personally, Wilma is my fav Flinstone character, and if they marketed
a Wilma pickup, I'd buy two, regardless of what they sounded like!
|
31.204 | | FREEBE::REAUME | I know trouble cuz I am | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:31 | 17 |
| Andrew Dice Clay says F-spaced is when you boink a dizzy broad!
But really it is the designation used to let you know that the
spacing for the poles of the pickup is set to Fender standard.
Or maybe the "F" stand for Floyd Rose?
When you use a standard humbucker it is "spaced" for Gibson
which started all the humbucker stuff in the fifties. When you put
a standard humbucker on a strat or strat clone you'll notice the
poles under the E strings will not line up with the string and
hence not have the best signal for these strings.
My Dimarzio Megadrive for my B.C. Rich ST-III is F-spaced and
"lines up" quite well. I believe the spacing of the Seymour Duncan
Trembucker is even wider spaced than an F-spaced because many
locking trems use wider string spacing.
-BooM-
|
31.205 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | All 4 1, and 1 4 all together | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:37 | 3 |
| I asked a fellow noter what F-Spaced meant last night, and he explained
it is to line up the low and High E strings better with Floyd Rose-type
tremolo units.
|
31.206 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Reelect nobody! | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:39 | 10 |
| re: -.1 yeah
f spaced is to compenstae for the fact that floyds and kahlers are
wider than a standard les paul bridge (what most humbuckers are sized
for) in my case my lead one has a jeff beck humbucker that almost
completely misses the high e string causing a thin sound until it's
bent. So I've been considering a paf pro f-spaced replacement for it.
dbii
|
31.207 | | DUGGAN::SAKELARIS | | Mon Oct 29 1990 10:08 | 8 |
| I've got a pair of old DiMarzio super distortion HB'ers on my strat and
I don't notice anything "thin" or otherwise rcognizable as a fault
because they aren't "f" spaced. Don't know if that means that F spacing
is marketing bullsh1t, but that'd be one test I'd like to make. One
thing I damn sure of however is that the audience wouldn't hear the
difference.
"sakman"
|
31.208 | Not so much BS | ICS::BUCKLEY | Noone's home in my house of pain | Mon Oct 29 1990 10:11 | 6 |
| -1
RE: Marketing BS...why do you think Van Halen mounted the humbuckers
in his modified strat guitars on a slant? So the low and high E
strings would line up with the pickup pole pieces!
|
31.209 | Les Paul Wiring.. | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Mon Oct 29 1990 16:29 | 16 |
|
This is a wiring question... I was looking at the wiring setup on
a guit that I recently got from dbii (thanks, dude) WHILE... reading
Bronsac's "Electronics for musicians. He clearly states that Les Pauls
(and many other 2 humbucker guitars) route from the pickups to the
switch then to the controls.. BUT, it's been my experience with all Les
Pauls and with this new guitar that it's the opposite... Looks like Les
Pauls go from the pickups to the controls THEN to the switch... Howcum
they use all the extra wire??? What're the pros and cons of each
method??? Help...
Gree Veee Broken Hand
|
31.210 | | AQUA::ROST | Neil Young and Jaco in Zydeco Hell | Mon Oct 29 1990 16:33 | 6 |
| Well, if you have only one volume control and two pickups, for
instance, you would wire from pickups to switch to volume. About LPs,
that statement seems wrong, if the signal went to the switch first, how
could you control the volumes separately?
Brian
|
31.211 | multi-pole switches | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vote Yes on 3 | Tue Oct 30 1990 09:10 | 30 |
| If the switch is a quad-pole switch, you could place it before or
after the controls and it would work either way.
+ --------------- o1 -----------to vol and tone----|
lead pickup | | |
- gnd --- o2 --- |-jack
| tip
+ --------------- o3 -----------to vol and tone----|
rhythm pickup | |
- gnd --- o4 ---
in position 1, only the lead pickup is kicked in (pole 1).
in position 2, both pickups are kicked in (poles 2&3), but they are
isolated.
in position 3, only the rhythm pickup is kicked in (pole 4).
Using this type of switch allows you to place the controls wherever
you want them. Ever check out a Gibson switch up close. they have
several metal bars separated by fiber spacers. When the switch is in
the center position, both poles are kicked in , but there are separate
shorting bars which complete each circuit. If they didn't do it this
way, the controls would interact.
Fender Strats are done differantly, but keep in mind a Strat has only
one master volume, and one of the tone controls is shared between the
middle and bridge pickups.
Mark
|
31.212 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Tue Oct 30 1990 14:54 | 12 |
|
OK, lemme ask you this.... This 2 humbucker dude I got from dbii,
lets EITHER volume control work for total volume when the switch is in
the middle. I kind of like it that way... do Pauls work that way?? I
used to own one but forget... Duh, droolin' in my porridge, agin.
Thanks for previous replys.
Steve
|
31.213 | | GSRC::COOPER | MIDI Rack Puke | Tue Oct 30 1990 15:12 | 11 |
| Hiya Steve...
I think the answer is: Kinda...
My LP allows you to control whether the volume is UP and all by
cutting output when either of the volumes is off...Otherwise, it
allows you to control the "mix" of the two pickups output...But, if
you cut the volume (either) off, no sound comes out. Is that what you
mean ?
jc
|
31.214 | | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Tue Oct 30 1990 17:32 | 9 |
|
Yeah... that must be it.... Either volume pot, given a sharp twist
in the counter clockwise direction will shut down all volume when
pick-up select is in the middle.... But why is that, coop??? Is it
because the two pick-up signals are "joined at the waist" when they get
to the switch and that either pot going to ground bleeds all the
signal??? Duh??
|
31.215 | | BSS::COLLUM | Oscar's only ostrich oiled an orange owl today | Tue Oct 30 1990 18:10 | 5 |
| >>> because the two pick-up signals are "joined at the waist" when they get
Yes, that's exactly why.
Will
|
31.216 | Well Wash my Burn.. | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Tue Oct 30 1990 21:47 | 10 |
|
OKEY DOKEY DUDES!!! I guess I'll stick with that scheme when I
replace parts in my new and gnarly washburn A20 (I'll sacrifice this
guitar to any fellow noter for $1400).
Thenkews...
Gree Veee
|
31.217 | | GSRC::COOPER | MIDI Rack Puke | Wed Oct 31 1990 10:41 | 3 |
| I was gonna say that it was that ancient Gibson technology...
Wagagagagagagaga
;)
|
31.218 | "Burn babe Burn" | BOSOX::MCLEMENT | 2 necks are better than 1 | Wed Oct 31 1990 11:05 | 5 |
|
My pickups are in place, and ready to sing.
Double-Wammy/Megggga-Drive.
Mark.
|
31.219 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | But this amp goes to 11 | Wed Oct 31 1990 11:22 | 3 |
| Mark, how would you descrive the sound of the Double-Whammy pickup?
Greg
|
31.220 | "??????" | BOSOX::MCLEMENT | 2 necks are better than 1 | Wed Oct 31 1990 12:01 | 4 |
|
Greg, I will be heading for my rig with them tonight, I will
let you know the results tomorrow.
Mark.
|
31.221 | Les Paul Pickups | PSYLO::WILSON | | Wed Dec 12 1990 09:48 | 13 |
| I own a new Les Paul Studio, and while I really like the sound of the
neck pick-up, I dislike the sound of the bridge pickup (too "squawky"
or something).
Any suggestions for replacement pickups are welcome, and by the way is
it easy for a novice like myself to replace a pickup? What tools would
I need, etc.? Prices of replacement pickups?
Any other LP owners who've had to modify/change their pickups?
Wes
|
31.222 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | and he shall reign for ever and ever | Wed Dec 12 1990 09:57 | 4 |
| -1
Personally, I'm all over the Ibanez pickups...I think they rule!
The DiMarzio PAF Pro is a cool pickup, too.
|
31.223 | SQUAWK SQUAWK GRRROWLL! | COPCLU::SANDGREN | Fast Fred | Wed Dec 12 1990 10:00 | 13 |
|
Hi Wes,
if you mean squawky the same way as I mean squawky, that's exactly
what I like and what you can expect from an LP...
However, I've heard that f.ex. Bill Lawrence makes very fine hum-
buckers, both PAF (the most squawk sounding ones) replicas and some
more smooth sounding ones as well. I once tried a DiMarzio PAF re-
plica on my LP, it was terrible hard sounding, couldn't stand it...
Poul
|
31.224 | PAFs roool! | ICS::BUCKLEY | and he shall reign for ever and ever | Wed Dec 12 1990 10:14 | 9 |
| ANother plug...the Duncan "Custom" pickup...nice!
The "custom", fyi, is a super-wound PAF-style pickups...similar to, but
different than, the Dimarzio PAF Pro. The PAF Pro has more windings
than a normal PAF, but is voiced with a higher presence range of freq.
The Duncan Custom pickups has more windings, but is voiced with an
increased midrange response. Take yer pick.
Buck, who likes PAF-style pickups a lot.
|
31.225 | the growl of growls | PNO::HEISER | love inhalation | Wed Dec 12 1990 11:14 | 3 |
| slap an Ibanez V2 in there!
Mike
|
31.226 | WillllllllMA ! | GSRC::COOPER | MIDI Rack Puke | Wed Dec 12 1990 11:31 | 4 |
| My LP has Seymour Duncan baby humbuckers in it. It screams.
I second SD for the replacement.
How about a FRED though??
|
31.227 | n' sit back w/ a beer...aye!! | SALEM::TAYLOR_J | | Wed Dec 12 1990 14:38 | 4 |
| Isn't the FRED pickup the one that Satriani uses? I heard that these
are so powerful that they could pull the chrome off a trailer hitch
JT "GONZO"
|
31.228 | overdrive+ | PNO::HEISER | love inhalation | Wed Dec 12 1990 15:12 | 3 |
| Re: FRED & Satriani
Yup!
|
31.229 | Not that high output | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Join the Brotherhood of Tone | Wed Dec 12 1990 15:58 | 7 |
| FWIW I didn't get the impression from the literature I read that the
Fred was an extremely high output pickup. It's similar to a PAF Pro
but voiced for more midrange.
Now my Duncan Invader definately WILL pull chrome off yer bumper!
Greg
|
31.230 | | E::EVANS | | Wed Dec 12 1990 16:55 | 3 |
| I you had a LP and wanted to swap out one of the pick ups, which one goes?
Jim (who has a LP and is considering this rather than buying another guitar)
|
31.231 | | GSRC::COOPER | MIDI Rack Puke | Wed Dec 12 1990 17:33 | 5 |
| Hmmm, I don't think I'd bail either one, but it'd be the
bridge pickup if I had too... I'd probably put in a Fred;
I like the color.
;)
|
31.232 | Most of the Freds I've seen have been black | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Join the Brotherhood of Tone | Wed Dec 12 1990 18:43 | 3 |
| ...but they come in your choice of several colors.
?
|
31.233 | fer my LP(yuk) | GLOWS::COCCOLI | monitoring reality | Wed Dec 12 1990 19:04 | 10 |
|
Not to get off the original subject, but..
Anyone ever hear an SD Holdsworth?.
RichC
|
31.234 | | ICS::BUCKLEY | and he shall reign for ever and ever | Thu Dec 13 1990 09:31 | 9 |
| RE: a few back
When I first swapped out a pickup in my LP, I put a Dimarzio SD in the
NECK position! The guy who did the installation thought I was crazy!
But what the scam was I was using the neck pickup for all my solos, and
I wanted that cleaner, crunchier sound in the bridge!
So, whatever your need...
B
|
31.235 | JOE BARDEN pickups | TRUCKS::LITTEN | | Thu Dec 13 1990 11:45 | 14 |
| I am in the market for a new telecaster, and therefore zoom in on any
discussions around them.
My hero, Danny Gatton, is drooling about Joe Barden pickups, and the UK guitar
mags are giving them rave reviews.
I gather they are US made, Danny refers to how he taught Seymor Duncan to wind
pickups and how (I think) Joe worked with them.
I don't know if Joe is doing any models for LP's but if I was in the market
for a pickup upgrade, I would want to try a JB first, or at least include him
on my shopping list.
Dave
|
31.236 | Alembic Active pickups !! | BAGELS::KNOX | but now I try to be amused | Fri Dec 14 1990 12:52 | 16 |
| A few years ago, a friend of mine put Alembic Active pickups in his
vintage strat. The range of sounds he was able to get out of them
was nothing short of astounding .... from the cleanest "Nashville"
sound to the "Les Paul thru a Marshall Stack on 10!!" sound. If there
were any guitarists in the audience, there would invariably come up to
him and ask what he was using to get that killer sound.
I was so impressed with these pickups that I put a pair of the Alembic
bass pickups in my '67 Jazz Bass. What a difference !!! I still get
that vintage Fender bass sound, but I can also get more high end off it
than I do on my Steinberger. As a matter of fact, I'm actually thinking
of replacing on of the EMG's on my Steinberger with an Alembic (if they
make one that fits...) JMHO, of course ................
/Billy K
|
31.237 | split-coils | STOHUB::TRIGG::EATON | | Tue Feb 05 1991 10:55 | 9 |
| Now that I'm going to have two guitars with dual humbuckers, I'm
interested in hearing more about split-coil configurations. My impression from
the notes in this topic is that they come close to sounding like a single coil,
but not quite there.
What are the recommended brands for this type of pu. And if I don't
want to alter the guitars, can I go with a switch on one of the knobs?
Dan
|
31.238 | I like Parallel | DNEAST::GREVE_STEVE | Greee Veee King | Tue Feb 05 1991 15:35 | 12 |
|
Dan, I'd also look at parallel configurations.. when I split
dmarzios or Seymour Duncans.. I find that things get really thin.. even
thinner than a single coil.. dono y though. Parallel seems to satisfy
me though kind of like a high power single coil... my biggest success
(tone-wise) was wiring a JB in parallel in the neck of a standard tele.
This guitar still has one of the collest sounds I've heard (so why did
you sell it you dumb turd???) heh heh
Steve
|
31.239 | I think I have that...
| STOHUB::TRIGG::EATON | | Tue Feb 05 1991 16:28 | 9 |
| I think I have that very setup on my Les Paul copy - when the switch
is set in the center position the tone that comes out can be a lot thinner based
on the volume setting of the two volume knobs. Is that what you're talking
about?
I guess I was just thinking that if I have two gibson-type configurations
I should look into getting at least one single-coil-type pickup in the works.
Dan
|
31.240 | distance between strings and pickups? | GOOROO::CLARK | a high, lonesome sound | Wed Mar 06 1991 12:50 | 12 |
| I'm not going to go through the previous 239 replies to see whether
this has been discussed before, so ...
How far away should the pickups be from the strings? I was jamming
last night with a friend who just bought an '85 Strat (maple neck).
It seemed to have standard Fender pickups, but it seemed to capture
a lot more of the fine points of the picking attack, etc. than my
American Standard. I did notice that his pickups were much closer
to the strings than mine. Does raising the pickup affect tone that
much? I've heard arguments for and against.
- Dave
|
31.241 | Watch out for magnet pull | LEDS::BURATI | Infidel THIS! | Wed Mar 06 1991 13:26 | 10 |
| I found that having the pickups too close to the strings on my
old standard strat interferred with the vibration of the strings.
This was the cause of some very undesirable overtones on the lower
strings. Using super-steele type strings was even worse because they
were even more effected by the magnetic field. My pickups are
now set pretty low, especially at the lower end.
BTW, it took me a long time to figure out what was causing this effect.
I kept trying to adjust the intonation and looking for something loose.
|
31.242 | Back to the future??? | SALEM::DACUNHA | | Wed Mar 06 1991 14:45 | 9 |
|
The travel of a vibrating string should be centered
within the "flux density" of the pickup.
This is easy if you have a field map of your pickups.
If not, use your ear...pluck, adjust, pluck, adjust etc..
|
31.243 | My 2c worth | KURMA::JHYNDMAN | REBEL WITHOUT A CLUE | Thu Mar 07 1991 03:00 | 5 |
| The effect you get when fretting higher up the neck on the heavier
strings is called "wolfing" commonly.What you want to do is raise the
pickups 'til you get that strange added harmonic sound when fretting up
there,and just back them off slowly til it *just* goes away..I find
this to be the optimum point,at least on my Strat.
|
31.244 | | JUPITR::TASHJIAN | | Thu Mar 07 1991 03:49 | 6 |
| You'll find that a magic ## of 1/8" off the poles workes as a place to
start from. The higher the magentic pull, the farther away ya want
to be. It's really touch & go, no pun intended.
Jay
|
31.245 | | GOOROO::CLARK | a high, lonesome sound | Thu Mar 07 1991 10:43 | 6 |
| re .244
is that 1/8" when the strings are not fretted, or 1/8" when you're
pressing down on the 22nd fret (or somewhere in between)?
thanks - DAve (an engineer who likes things expressed numerically :-) )
|
31.246 | | JUPITR::TASHJIAN | | Fri Mar 08 1991 03:46 | 5 |
| I found on the 22nd fret. This allows ya to then adjust it to
ya own personal taste.
Jay
|
31.247 | Constructive Lace Sensor input wanted ... 8^) | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Gimme something to conceive in ... | Thu Mar 14 1991 11:10 | 26 |
| This is probably discussed (in depth) somewhere already, but ...
I'm gonna throw at least 1 Lace Sensor in my Strat in a couple
days. Here's what my local music dealer had to say about 'em,
quoting from the Fender literature. I also included the list/cash
prices as well.
RED - Mega hot ! Increased output and gain. ($90/$69.30)
BLUE - Classic 50's humbucker sound. ($89/62.30)
GOLD - 1950's vintage ($79/55.30)
SILVER - Fat blues/R&B, increased midrange. ($89/62.30)
My question is, what are your opinions on these ? And please,
spare me the, "I think the s*ck because ..." replies. I'm looking
for input from folks who already use 'em. The Lace Sensor is
definitely the type of pickup I want to go with - just trying to
decide which ones.
Right now, I'm considering a BLUE in the bridge position, and 2
SILVER or GOLD.
Talk to me ! 8^)
Scary
|
31.248 | | SAMMAX::lambert | Is that a real poncho? | Thu Mar 14 1991 11:35 | 14 |
| My American Std Deluxe Strat has 3 Gold FLS pickups. I can't compare
these to the other colors as I've never heard those, but to me the gold
ones sound GREAT. (I believe your "chart" may be a little off on the
description of the different sounds though: As I remember it, the gold
are supposed to be "Classic Strat" sounding, not "50s vintage". The blue
ones are supposed to fill that niche.) The gold ones retain the standard
Strat sound while virtually eliminating hum and buzz problems. I regularly
use my Strat in a basement with flourescent lighting and have no problems
at all, while my bass with single coils is almost useless in the same
environment due to the noise.
They are outrageously expensive as aftermarket pickups, though...
-- Sam
|
31.249 | yeah! | GOOROO::CLARK | a high, lonesome sound | Thu Mar 14 1991 11:50 | 11 |
| I agree with sammax about the gold lace sensors. I played a strat
with 3 of them in it at MacDuff's last week and was amazed at
the sound. I'm definately going to purchase some of them when
I can afford it (c'mon, DEC stock, you can make it up over 100!).
I can't say I'm too interested in any other sound out of my Strat
anyways, so I haven't bothered to check on the rest of them.
Mr. C quoted me a price of $120 for 3 gold ones, BTW.
- Dave
|
31.250 | Guess I'm blue .... | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Gimme something to conceive in ... | Thu Mar 14 1991 12:03 | 8 |
| I think I'm gonna go with a blue FLS now, and see how it does.
Thanks for the help guys !
Scary
BTW - does anyone know if they wire in the same as the stock Amer. Std.
pickups ?
|
31.251 | my opinion | COPCLU::SANDGREN | Lhep! I'm trpdd ina P11D*P | Fri Mar 15 1991 03:46 | 17 |
|
Scary,
I tried both the silver and the gold in the bridge position on
my Blade, and I would definitely go for the silver, it has a
far more 'vintage' sound, where the gold was too sharp, IMHO.
I also tried the gold in the middle, and here it sounded nice.
I still miss to try the silver here, though. When I decide, I
will go for 1 silver in the bridge pos. + 2 gold OR just 3 sil-
ver.
Compared with my traditional singlecoils on my Blade, the Lace
PU's had clearly more output and less hum. My $.02!
Poul
|
31.252 | I thought the older ones had more output | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Red light, Green light, TNT | Fri Mar 15 1991 11:48 | 11 |
| Awhile back I played a couple of Strats back-to-back in a store, one
was like a mid 70s model or so and had stock (appearing) pickups and
the other was a new Strat+ with gold Lace-Sensors.
The old Strat had a lot more output then the Strat+, but the Strat+ was
quieter and had a (subjectively) "sweeter" sound to it.
I think if I were going for a set I'd probably want the silver ones
'cause I like a little more output.
Greg
|
31.253 | Did I wire this thing in backwards ? | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Real men don't need whammies ! | Tue Mar 19 1991 21:10 | 16 |
| OK, got my Blue Lace Sensor today - proceeded to wire the little guy
in. The enclosed wiring diagram showed the orange lead going to switch
and the white lead going to the volume pot. The stock pickups were
wired the exact opposite - white to switch, orange/blue to volume pot.
Who's right ? I wired it (color-wise) like the existing pickups, which
is the reverse of the enclosed drawing. The pickup works fine, but it
doesn't knock my socks off or anything. Could I have it in backwards ?
Will this cause any damage to anything ?
While I was at the store I played a Strat + with gold Lace Sensors
(ordered 2 of 'em ...) through a Fender Bassman re-issue. I didn't try
any overdive units with it, but for an unbeatable clean tone - folks,
that's your rig. Mercy !
Scary
|
31.254 | try a silver | COPCLU::SANDGREN | Lhep! I'm trpdd ina P11D*P | Wed Mar 20 1991 05:53 | 13 |
|
Hey Scary,
You won't damage anything by reversing the wires...but if
you use the pu switch so you play the new Lace in parallel
with the next pu, you'll get an extremely thin and ugly
tone, if it's wired in reverse order...
So, how much did you pay for the blue one? And how much will
the gold ones cost you?
Poul (who's_soon_gonna_take_a_decision_about_silver_or_gold)
|
31.255 | More FLS info than you could ever want ! 8^) | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Real men don't need whammies ! | Wed Mar 20 1991 07:02 | 39 |
| Well, after I entered that note, I played it for a pretty good while.
The pickups is VERY touch sensitive, but as you say, when I put the
switch on #2, it's pretty thin. But to me, #2 and #4 is what make s a
Strat a Strat. Since I wired exactly opposit from what the diagram
says, I very sure that I wired it backwards. I change it when I get
the 2 gold ones next week.
I was quoted $89 (list) for the blue FLS and ended up paying $60 for
it. The gold ones I ordered will cost me $50 each.
Here's the breakdown on which FLS does what .... taken from the Fender
litereature ...
2000 FLS (99-2000) - The Golden Strat mainly used on the Fender Strat
Plus, the legendary 50's Strat sound. GOLD
2001 FLS (99-2001) - the classic 50's humbucker, an increased output,
warm rich harmonic sound. BLUE
2002 FLS (99-2002) - quite possibly the hottest sensor made, full range
frequency response with red-hot, mega-output sound. RED
I don't have any literature on the SILVER, but while at the music store
yesterday I read up on it - it *supposedly* has boosted midrange and is
designed for blues/r&b.
The BLUE and RED are the most expensive (listing around $90) and the
GOLD and SILVER are the cheapest (listing around $80).
After playing the strat plus with GOLD fls's, that helped me make up my
mind.
Oh yeah, you can get these FLS's with a black OR white cover. I just
ordered one, expecting white, but black was all they had. After I
installed in, it looks *nice* (black strat with white pickguard, and
soon-to-be 3 blacl FLS's ...).
Scary
|
31.256 | thin+ | COPCLU::SANDGREN | Lhep! I'm trpdd ina P11D*P | Wed Mar 20 1991 07:54 | 8 |
|
I know it's thin sounding in pos. 2 & 4, because that's how
it sounds when you connect two single coils in parallel...
but now, if you connect one of them in reverse, it doesn't
just sound thin, it sounds _weird_ thin =8*{ ...
Poul
|
31.257 | Ditto Poul | LEDS::BURATI | Infidel THIS! | Thu Mar 21 1991 15:41 | 13 |
| Many players refer to the 2 and 4 positions as thin sounding. Fine.
But when the pickups that are summed by either of these two switch
positions are electrically out-of-phase, thin takes on a whole new meaning,
and a very negative one. Most of the signal is canceled. Not just
part (like the mids in the all too familiar Strat "out-of-phase" sound) but
MOST. Compared to what it is supposed to sound like, the guitar sounds
completely anemic. Yes, strat players usually want that "out-of-phase"
sound but the pickups aren't actually electrically out-of-phase. It's a
mis-nomer.
Have I beat this topic far enough into the ground?
--rjb
|
31.258 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Real men don't need whammies ! | Fri Mar 22 1991 06:34 | 12 |
| .... yes. 8^)
Seriously, I understand what you're saying. Last night at the club, I
got to try out the new FLS (wired improperly, I'm sure). In #1, it
absolutely *screamed*, not much of a volume difference from the
standard pickups (like I expected there would be). In #2, it was very
strat-ish, but #4 was somewhat louder. From all I have gathered, I
definitely wired it backwards, but I correct it when I install the
other to FLS's next week ...
Scary
|
31.259 | which is the best? | GOOROO::CLARK | a high, lonesome sound | Fri Mar 22 1991 09:57 | 12 |
| so, among the 'noise-free' single coils, which do YOU think is the
best?
- FLS of various colors
- EMG's (price?)
- Alembic's (price?)
- SD Hot Stacks
dave (lookingto upgrade the stock pickups in his Strat soon)
|
31.260 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Real men don't need whammies ! | Fri Mar 22 1991 11:14 | 7 |
| I think it's all in what you want out of it - for me, the FLS's are
gonna do the trick - they'll yeild the *TONE* I want.
What results are you looking for ?
Scary
|
31.261 | My experience | MR4DEC::SAKELARIS | | Fri Mar 22 1991 11:29 | 6 |
| My Strat has a sd, a fls and a Dimarzio ( you didn't list that one).
I can tell you that the DiMarzio is absolutely the quietest. Dead quiet
even when I hold the guitar right up to the amp. FLS and SD are quiet
enough, but not as quiet.
"sakman"
|
31.262 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | victim of unix... | Mon Mar 25 1991 12:05 | 15 |
| if your dimarzio is an HS-2 or HS-3 then it's a humbucking stack and comparing
a stack to any non-stacked single coil is almost apples and oranges.
re: which should I choose?
duncan hot stacks are great but are fat and midrangy compared to a stock
fender pickup. The classic stack gives you the humbucking and a sound that's
much closer to an original fender single coil.
My EMG active single coil is kinda bassy and not too powerful compared to the
EMG humbucker (in the same guitar).
good hunting!
dbii
|
31.263 | Yep, same problem | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Stereotype, monotype, blood type... | Mon Mar 25 1991 12:53 | 11 |
| >My EMG active single coil is kinda bassy and not too powerful compared to the
>EMG humbucker (in the same guitar).
I have the same problem in one of my guitars with an EMG
single/single/hum configuration. The humbucker is an 81, which is
known for being very bright. I've thought of swapping it out with an
85 which has better bass response and isn't so bright because there's
so much difference that I can hardly use the single coils (after
setting the EQ to sound good with the 81).
Greg
|
31.264 | | RAVEN1::BLAIR | Blairing the Blues | Thu Mar 28 1991 12:59 | 12 |
|
I really thought I wanted to get on the strat stock p/u upgrade
wagon, but last night I tried out a strat plus (gold fls's) thru
my amp and was really unimpressed. I was able to do a good a/b
test with the neck p/u (where I generally play). To me, the fls
didn't have the output or tone I like. I was playing loud too,
with a few other guys, so I got to wring it out a bit. It may
have something to do with p/u height, etc, but I've decided to
stick with the stocker. I guess I really don't care about the
noise, to be honest.
-pat
|
31.265 | | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Real men don't need whammies ! | Thu Mar 28 1991 13:17 | 5 |
| Agreed - the stock Fender "noise" never was that big a deal to me
either. We're you playing Ray's ? I know you said before his Strat
was wimpy, for some reason ...
Scary
|
31.266 | | RAVEN1::BLAIR | Need a hot tune and a cold one | Fri Mar 29 1991 13:11 | 5 |
|
Ahem. Ray's guitar ain't wimpy - just different. My axe (a std) seems
to have a chubbier neck and heavier body though.
-pat
|
31.267 | damn this IBM keyboard! | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | victim of unix... | Sat Mar 30 1991 18:07 | 8 |
| Greg (or anyone else who has EMG's) are yours rather compressed
sounding? What I'm finding is that they are very clear, and very clean,
not that hot (power wise, good but not 'insane'), and pretty compressed
sounding. My singer thinks my lead 1 with the duncans has more 'bite'.
I think it's just the smoother more compressed sound of the emg's he's
complaining about...I do however, miss that bite myself.
dbii
|
31.268 | Compressed sound | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Stereotype, monotype, blood type... | Sun Mar 31 1991 19:18 | 13 |
| re: dbII
Yeah, now that you mention it, I think they probably are a little
compressed sounding. Steve Jensen (a *bigtime* EMG fan) and I were
just discussing this last week.
I think the passive pickups I've used have had more "character" and
"bite" and less clarity and consistancy then the EMGs. I still like
them a lot, wouldn't think of changing them out of the two guitars I
have them in and have a spare set sitting around still that I may
eventually use.
Greg
|
31.269 | EMGs reproduce *all* the notes | STRAT::JENSEN | Tone == JCM 900 | Wed Apr 10 1991 14:12 | 13 |
| Yup, I like EMGs. But the thing I like about them is that the notes in a
chord can all be heard; even when gain is on 20.... Passive pickups usually
sound like mud to me in that situation. The only "chord" that's any good is a 5
chord (e.g. A5 == A + E notes). Plus, EMGs are quiet as a mouse.
Now, with that said, I am swapping out the EMGs in my Ibenez Rg750 and putting
the stock pickups back in. That has more to do with my new amp (Marshall JCM
900) than any real dissatisfaction with the pickups. I just have this gut
feeling that the Marshall will sound better with passive pickups...
What do I know anyway? I just use what sounds good to me...
steve
|
31.270 | Volume vs. tone | LEDS::BURATI | Now, with FEELING | Tue Apr 16 1991 13:45 | 38 |
| I posted a reply in 813 that hit upon this subject but I thought it
ought to go here.
----
I recently picked up a copy of Fender's Fronline magazine and right
there in this Tech Tips column is a simple modification that the writer
claims will cure a problem that's driven me crazy for years (since 1966
to be exact).
The writer is Larry Brooks who is Fender Custom Shop's Artist Builder.
They say he builds guitars for most of the artists that Fender deals
with.
He says that the addition of a .001 uf cap and 150k ohm resistor to the
volume control...
1. remedies high-end loss in SINGLE COIL PICKUP SYSTEMS when the volume
control is set anywhere less than full up and
2. gives the control a smooth, linear taper for its entire range, i.e.
no hot spots
I haven't tried this on my Stratocaster, but you can bet that I will. It
involves installing a cap and resistor as shown below:
from PU ------
| 150k 1/4W
+--/\/\/--+
| |
+----||---+
| .001u |
\ |
/ |
vol \<--------+------- to output
/
\
|
---
///
|
31.271 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | victim of unix... | Wed Apr 17 1991 14:49 | 7 |
| RE: active pickups
Has anyone tried teh Semour Duncan actives? All I know is they require 2
batteries, according to the literature it's to avoid the 'compression'
most people get with EMG's.
dbii
|
31.272 | WAG time | EZ2GET::STEWART | No, I mean Real Music. | Wed Apr 17 1991 15:59 | 14 |
|
Two batteries? Two nine volt batteries? In series? I think
attributing more dynamic range to the use of higher supply rails is
simplistic. After all, the preamp shouldn't be generating +/- 4.5 v
swings (much less +/- 9v swings) on an "instrument" level output.
I've haven't noticed the compression effect with the EMGs on my
Steinberger, but then I haven't been looking for it, either. Theory
time: maybe the people that have this problem are running their pickups
full out and causing the front end of their amp to operate closer to
the saturation point?
|
31.273 | Two batteries for a bipolar power supply | COAL11::LAURENT | Hal Laurent, Loc: FOR, DTN: 378-6742 | Wed Apr 17 1991 17:42 | 4 |
| RE .272:
The two batteries probably isn't for more voltage. It's more likely to
supply a bipolar power supply (+9, -9, and GND) for an op-amp or two.
|
31.274 | .. | STRAT::JENSEN | Tone == JCM 900 | Wed Apr 24 1991 21:56 | 18 |
| I think I put a note in here a few back that said I was going to swap out the
EMGs in my Ibenez Rg750 and put the stock Ibenez passive pickups back in and
give it a whirl. If not, pretend I did.
Ok, the passive pickups sound much better through my Marshall than through my
Boogie -- *much* warmer. I don't even want to guess why. Do they sound better
than the EMGs?
I DON'T KNOW. I just don't know..... This is the other dilemma guitar player's
find themselves in...:)
BTW: I'm sure that EMGs spilt the 9v into +/- 4.5v supply so the instrumentation
amplifiers (type of op amp) work correctly. I also agree with something
mentioned earlier. I *can't* imagine that EMGs are the thing causing the
compression. Rather, I'll agree that the preamp they're feeding is getting
pushed closer to saturation.
steve
|
31.275 | ? | CAVLRY::BUCK | ICE :== Intense Coaster Enthusiasts! | Thu Apr 25 1991 10:24 | 3 |
| I *really* like the passive Ibanez pickups!!!
My rg550 plugged straight into my JCM900 is tone heaven for me.
|
31.276 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | victim of unix... | Thu Apr 25 1991 11:48 | 7 |
| I foudn that if I boost the brightness to wow my EMG's sound much better and
less compressed. Maybe I was hearing a lack of bright as compression/lack of
bite...
FWIW
dbii
|
31.277 | | GSRC::COOPER | Major MIDI Rack Puke (tm) | Thu Apr 25 1991 12:43 | 17 |
| I've found that the stock (passive) pickups sound a LOT fatter
tru my Marshalls than the active stuff in my Charvel...Almost to
the point that I think it's a little too fat (but I like
thin,remember).
Marshalls (at least mine) are VERY sensitive to what instrument you
plug into them. The diff between my LesPaul and my Ibanez (550/570)
is scary. The LesPaul threatens to shake the house foundation apart
with it's bass, and the Charvel will midrange you to death (and the
550 will too). The 570 sounds real fat and bassy, and the strat -
well - the strat sounds like a strat (and I love it thru the clean
channel on the marshall).
Anyway, my point is that there isn't that much of a diff between
instruments on all amps (especially where my rack is concerned.
jc (Who doesn't like to diddle knobs so much)
|
31.278 | OK, be that way | LEDS::BURATI | No Gain No Pain | Wed Jun 05 1991 15:24 | 26 |
| I *erroneously* responded to another reply in a *most* inappropriate
topic. I've *copied* it to here in hopes that it will be more *welcome*
so we can pursue *this* issue a bit further. As a Strat owner that's had
*this* problem, I truly *am* puzzled by the implication that it is
*especially* severe on single coil pickups and Strats *in* particular.
<<< CVG::WORK3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]GUITAR.NOTE;2 >>>
-< Guitar Notes >-
================================================================================
Note 2215.26 Recording Bass Guitar 26 of 29
LEDS::BURATI "No Gain No Pain" 13 lines 5-JUN-1991 12:35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you're getting alot of wierd overtones you might try lowering the
> pickups. All single coils to some extent, get wierd overtones, on
> strats they get worse the higher you go up the neck on the lower
> strings with the low e being awful on many/most strats past the 12th or
> 14th fret.
You mean other types of pickups on other types of guitars don't
have string-pull problems? I'm puzzled. I thought the problem of
string-pull was caused by the magnetic field. The greater the field,
the greater the interference with the string's motion. Do humbucking
pickups have less magnetic field per se? Also, you indicate that
the problem is especially bad on Strats? I must be missing something.
|
31.279 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | victim of unix... | Wed Jun 05 1991 16:52 | 11 |
| I've never seen the problem as bad as strats on guitars with
humbuckers. They do display the problem a bit but not nearly as bad.
Some strats are worse than others. I used to have a blonde strat that
you couldn't use the e,a or d string above the 10th fret 'cuz all you
got was dork tones. It made the trip to a new owner...my current strat
has the problem but not that bad, and I keep the pickups down on the
bass strings. One of the pitches for lace sensors is the low power
magnets, which helps curtail this problem. Perhaps an engineer type
can shed some light on why single coils are worse than humbuckers?
dbii
|
31.280 | I don't do titles | LEDS::BURATI | No Gain No Pain | Wed Jun 05 1991 17:32 | 15 |
|
Way back in 1970 I butchered my strat and put a humbucker on it. The
humbucker had much less output than the single coils. So I switched it
for a FENDER humbucker. Same. so I bought a new pickguard and put the
single coil back on. Then I bought a Guild archtop with a big soap-bar
neck PU and a humbucker installed at the bridge. I stuck the Gibson HB
on at the neck. This guitar has much less output than my Strat.
Never having had it explained to me, what you say would tend to indicate
that Humbuckers do assert less of a magnetic field which is consistent
with lower output. But I always figured that I had probably loaded the
PUs too much by having the wrong value pots 'cause I thought Humbuckers
are supposed to have lots of output.
Do I sound confused?
|
31.281 | I know it's not pickups but... | LEDS::BURATI | No Gain No Pain | Wed Jun 05 1991 18:24 | 1 |
| You had a blonde strat? Drooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllll.
|
31.282 | even still I miss it.. | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | victim of unix... | Wed Jun 05 1991 22:39 | 7 |
| Yeah I got it cheap and eventually traded it for the tele thinline I
have today since it had such a dorky sound playing high notes on the
lower strings. I was pretty though and had a mean mean action....
sigh...
dbii
|
31.283 | Bull**** baffles brains .....! | TRUCKS::LITTEN | | Mon Jun 10 1991 05:54 | 48 |
| Ok, ......I'll chip in with some thoughts (guesses) on why single coils
have more string pull.
Now I'm sure the pickup industry is full of hype and equally Seymor Duncan has
(rightly) made his name by green finger application on the craft of pickup
design.
But getting right down to it, ALL the characteristics of a pickup are based on
the magnetic field strength and it's distribution (footprint if you will), and
the number of winding turns (and their distribution). To a lesser extent the
type (gauge) and resistance of the wire. The clever design of the Lace makes
use of the different distribution of field strength. Different types of
magnets are said to give harder or warmer tones but as a failed engineer this
only equates in my mind to greater or lesser magnetic field ! The only area of
doubt to this is the possibility that a vibrating metal string MAY cause the
magnetic field of the pole pieces to change very slightly ( magnetic
complience), and this in itself may result in tone differences. Any thoughts
out there ?
OK. Getting to my theory (I'll accept any more you care to post) the string
pull is only down to the magnetic pole pieces, so for a given output the
single coils act ON A SINGLE POINT of the string and all the magnetic pull is
focused at that point. With dual coils the pole pieces are about one inch
apart and pull at two points. This effect also gives the dual coil less treble
because there is a small amount of cancellation due to the two points of
"pickup". Now, you can sit the single coils further away and this will help
but the output volume and tone will change.
I am not sure but the "typical" humbucker often has a large bar magnet and the
pole pieces screw into this resulting in a larger more distributed magnetic
field. Compare this to the Fender approach of small pieces of isolated round
bar magnet sat on a non metalic former.
So, in summary the single point of pull is more effective at influencing the
string vibration and the resultant amplitude of overtones and because the dual
coils pull at two points they work against each other in terms of string pull
and the resultant inharmonic overtones. The weakness in my theory is that a
strat has three pickups and why don't these perform a magnetic cancellation ?
Well, I think that is due to the distance between them ie two/three inches.
I just had an interesting thought...what if I mounted another single coil on
top of the string to cancel the pull....I would not even have to connect it
electrically since I only need it's field strength to perform
cancelation..........hmmmmmmmmm
Dave
|
31.284 | This may be a re-occuring theme | CSC32::MOLLER | Fix it before it breaks | Mon Jun 10 1991 15:17 | 37 |
| As a side note, Rickenbacker's old Lap Steels (the predecessor of the
pedal steels - these were very popular in the 1930's) had a pickup that
completely wrapped around the strings. This is an attempt an ascii diagram:
/-------- ---------\
( * * * * * * )
\-------- ---------/ this is a view where the *'s are the
strings. If you can imagine 2 horseshoe
magnets surrounding the strings, this
might make some sense to you.
Neck is up this direction
| | | | | | This is a top view. The pickup completely
| | | | | | wraps around the the strings. I suppose
+==========+ +==========+ The goal was an equal magnetic field.
| | | |
+==========+ +==========+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Bridge is down here
By the way, the lap steel guitar that I saw this on was made out of cast
aluminum, and probably made in the early 1930's. I have no idea how the
pickup was wound, or where the coils are. The person who had it had not
tried to play it since the late 1950's, and remembers little about it (it
came with it's own amplifier).
Some MIDI pickups are designed where the string passes thru the pickup (a
seperate coil for each string), to keep the each strings action isolated.
Jens
|
31.285 | | RGB::ROST | Jimmy Blanton's love child | Tue Jun 11 1991 09:18 | 7 |
| Re: .284
Rickenbacker continued to use the "horseshoe" pickups into the sixties.
Early models of the 4000 and 4001 basses used a similar pickup. I've
seen other ancient lap steels with pickups like that as well.
Brian
|
31.286 | The Sustainor | PHAROS::SAKELARIS | | Fri Nov 15 1991 17:00 | 10 |
| About two years ago, I remember some new pickup that Floyd Rose had
developed. I think they were installed on some Kramer guitar. The
pickup was called the Sustainor and it seems to me that it wasn't
really a pickup in the traditional sense, but rather a magnetic field
type of device that kept the string vibrating - something like the EBOW
except that it was mounted like a pickup (maybe it was also a pickup, I
don't recall).
Anybody out there in guitar land have any experience
with these things; are they any good; are they still available?
|
31.287 | | KDX200::COOPER | Step UP to the RACK ! | Fri Nov 15 1991 17:10 | 6 |
| Is it the same pickup as the Sustainiac ??? Or am I really confused.
:)
Seems like Blues Saraceno had 'em in his Yammie.
jc
|
31.288 | | WASTED::tomg | Living In A World Of Illusion | Fri Nov 15 1991 17:18 | 10 |
|
re: .-1
I'm sure it's the sustainiac thingy Sakman is talking
about.
Dunno anything about it, but it looks like another
gadget that died an early death.
|
31.289 | My Les Paul has killer sustain without extra devices... | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Tommy The Cat | Sat Nov 16 1991 11:31 | 24 |
| >Seems like Blues Saraceno had 'em in his Yammie.
Whatchoo talkin about, boy? Blues had Duncan Double-Whammy pickups in
his Yamaha (a custom RGZ) at the clinic we saw. :-)
To respond to the question at hand, there was both a Kramer model with
the Floyd Sustainer device in it and the Sustainiac guitar made by some
company called ASI that did something similar (not sure if it had the
genuine Floyd Rose device in it or not). Neither did very well on the
market. I've seen some of the mail order places I get catalogs from
dumping off both models for less then they asked for them originally.
For example, in the newest Musician's Friend catalog, in the "Blowout
Specials" section they list the ASI Sustainiac guitars for $349.88
(list was $699.95 according to them). Several colors are available, so
there's probably a bunch of them. They also list a Kramer Sustainer
(PCS-1, in flip-flop red) for $889.88 (list was $1525.90) in the same
section.
I remember when the Kramers were first out a local store had one and
I'm very sure they wanted over $1K for it.
Greg
|
31.290 | Life after Dimarzio? | COMET::COFFIN | | Mon Dec 23 1991 17:44 | 10 |
|
Has anybody tried the Dimarzio " X2N " humbucker pick-up?
I bought a set and I'm pretty impressed with the sound and sustain, but
I was wondering if there was physically a "hotter" pick-up on the
market, besides active powered ones?
|
31.291 | Duncan Invader | CIVIC::BUCKLEY | | Mon Dec 23 1991 21:06 | 11 |
| -1
I believe the Duncan "Invader" model was made to be a hotter, passive
alternative to the Dimarzio X-2N. One good thing about the Duncan's is
they're potted...I used to use an X-2N, and found problems in
high-volume, high-gain situations with microphonic feedback, and always
wished the Dimarzios were potted to eliminate it. But, the Dimarzio
is a great sounding pickup, if you can deal with the feedback problem
(if you have that problem).
Buck, who's Marshall 2205 *hated* those pickups (microphonically speaking)
|
31.292 | The Invader | BINKLY::TAREILA | | Tue Dec 24 1991 09:51 | 12 |
|
I second Buck's response about the Duncan's Invader. That is one hot and
powerful pickup! I had to lower it a little from the strings because of
the strong magnetic pull.
I had the pickup in the bridge position of an old guitar that I sold. (but I
kept the pickup when I sold the guitar). Someday I'll find a new home for it.
It's a humbucker but it has a 4 wire confiq so you can split it if you want.
/marc
|
31.293 | useless addendum #293 | CAVLRY::BUCK | | Tue Dec 24 1991 10:28 | 3 |
| fwiw, the Duncan Invader is fugly lookin...but sounds great!
...a perfect match for a Metaltronix M-1000 head! 8^)
|
31.294 | | KDX200::COOPER | Step UP to the RACK ! | Tue Dec 24 1991 12:31 | 6 |
| Thats the baby that Greg House had in his Kramer, me thinks.
Buck is right - the pickup has these like round-headed allen
screw thingies (technical eh ??) for pole pieces... that the one ?
Me also thinks "Hot" is an under statement.
:)
|
31.295 | Brrrr | CAVLRY::BUCK | | Tue Dec 24 1991 12:44 | 3 |
| Yeah Coop, that's it...those bug lug-type pole piece thangs...
fugly!
|
31.296 | | KDX200::COOPER | Step UP to the RACK ! | Tue Dec 24 1991 12:50 | 6 |
| Remember that old Dean "Z" I had ?? I think it had those in it...
They "looked" the same anyway. The screws ought to go in a rack, not in
a pickup.
:)
jc
|
31.297 | Thumbs down on the Invader for me | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Tommy The Cat | Thu Dec 26 1991 11:08 | 14 |
| There is only one pickup on earth that looks like that. The Invader is
instantly recognizable!
Yeah, I had one in a Kramer I used to have. I liked it's tone when the
volume was turned up all the way, but the sound changed and it thinned
out and sounded whiny if you rolled off the volume. Neither the
Dimarzio-made pickups in my Ibanez or my stock Gibson pickups in my Les
Paul change so drastically.
The Invader was made to shred and nothing else. Don't bother with the
volume or tone controls on the guitar if you get one. Major output,
but kind of like a bludgeon when it comes to finesse.
Greg
|
31.298 | | HEDRON::DAVE | UNIX is cool... | Thu Dec 26 1991 12:53 | 14 |
| I'm gonna eat a little crow here.
I've decided that the EMG's in my ESP are the best pickups I've ever worked with.
(It has an EMG81 humbucker and one SA single coil)
I love the sound of the SA, like a strat only better, much richer harmonically.
The 81 has a nice tendancy to break into feedback an octave higher than the
note you were sustaining, 'specially when using my kitty preamps on wow.
But best of all: no cord noise. I was always plagued by microphonic guitar cords.
But the low impedance of the EMG's and the drive the active electronics provides
has effectivaly eliminated that problem once and for all.
dbii
|
31.299 | Invaders huh? | COMET::COFFIN | | Thu Dec 26 1991 16:43 | 7 |
|
What kind of problems do you encounter when you have a hot set of
pick-ups that are up too close to the strings?
Also, how much $ do these invaders usually run?
|
31.300 | | BINKLY::TAREILA | | Thu Jan 02 1992 09:58 | 13 |
|
>> What kind of problems do you encounter when you have a hot set of
>> pick-ups that are up too close to the strings?
My biggest problem was when I used my Floyd Rose tremolo. When I'd do a dive
bomb with it the strings would stick to the pickup because of it's magnetic
pull. This is ok at a certain point, but I didn't like it happening
prematurely. On an older guitar it also pulled my strings out of tune (very
slightly). I just added a little more distance between the pickup and the
strings.
/marc
|
31.301 | | HEDRON::DAVE | UNIX is cool... | Thu Jan 02 1992 12:38 | 5 |
| Single coils will pull onthe string and pull it out of tune. many strat owners
have experienced the low e string that won;t intonate and isn't in tune above
the 10th fret no matter what. Usually lowering the pickups will fix this.
dbii
|
31.302 | | PHAROS::SAKELARIS | | Tue Feb 25 1992 09:24 | 16 |
| I'd like to do a modification to my Strat. It has 2 dual coil
humbuckers in it now and a three position switch. What I'd like to do
is split the coils on one of the pickups so that I can switch them to
series/parallel configuration.
I'd also need to change the switch to a
5 position. Position 1 would be the bridge pickup. 2 would be a phase
reversal between the neck and bridge pickup. The middle is neck and
bridge in phase. The fourth is neck pickup with coils in series, and the
5th is neck pickup with coils in parallel.
Anybody got a schematic of how I might do this? I tried to figure it
out and I end up confused.
"sakman"
|
31.303 | | HEDRON::DAVE | tiny 24 fret thaang... | Thu Feb 27 1992 12:16 | 4 |
| Has anyone heard, tried etc. Semour Duncan live wires? (They are duncans answer
to EMG actives).
dbii who really NEEDS to blow some money on pickups...
|
31.304 | | PHAROS::SAKELARIS | | Mon Mar 09 1992 09:50 | 10 |
| re .302
Ok, don't everyone reply at once here ... I'm not believing that nobody
in here knows how to do this. Maybe I'm asking too much. So let's try
just splitting the dual coil. Any help here? I've done this before so I
know it can be done with a 2-pole 2 throw miniswitch. I just can't
remember how I wired the switch and I get confused and frustrated
trying to figure it drawing it on paper. Any help here?
Thanx in advance - "sakman"
|
31.305 | | PHAROS::SAKELARIS | | Mon Mar 16 1992 08:10 | 12 |
| re .304
OK, OK, don't everyone jam the network on this one either. I can see
I've hit a nerve here - a dead one. Jus' kidding, save the daggers.
I called Dimarzio for the information and they faxed me a sheet with
all the information I could ever want regarding the wiring of pickups.
If anyone's interested, their number is (800)221-6468 (outside of NYC).
"sakman"
|
31.306 | | MARX::SAKELARIS | | Thu Apr 30 1992 10:26 | 10 |
| Anyone know about this? On a Strat, when you switch the selector to the
2nd or 4th positions, are you placing two pickups aout of phase or are you
switching the pickups relative position, ie, series to parallel. I'm
pretty sure the switch is for series/parallel, but not definite.
Also, what pickups are on in what position. I've lost too many brain
cells since I last owned a conventional Strat.
Thanx,
"sakman"
|
31.307 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | grep?? | Thu Apr 30 1992 13:34 | 5 |
| When you go to the 2nd or 4th position on the switch you enable the
middle/bridge or the middle/neck pickups in parallel. Phasing has nothing
to do with it.
dbii
|
31.308 | | MARX::SAKELARIS | | Thu Apr 30 1992 14:09 | 8 |
| re: 307
Dave,
What pickups are on then for the middle position, all three? Yep, must
be, its coming back to me now - its the middle pickup thats never on by
itself, Right? You sure about parallel?
"sakman"
|
31.309 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | grep?? | Thu Apr 30 1992 14:31 | 7 |
| Well no,, when you select the middle switch position all you get is the middle
pickup.
You can test this by taking a pick and clicking on the pickups with the guitar
plugged into an amp and try all 5 positions...
dbii
|
31.310 | Stratomatic | SMURF::BENNETT | What goes down the stairs alone or in pairs? | Thu Apr 30 1992 16:06 | 13 |
|
Hi Dave -
My strat's wired so that my switch positions do:
1 - bridge
2 - mid and bridge (parallel, out)? - anyway, this position is quiet
3 - middle
4 - mid and neck - wired for humlessness
5 - neck (hmmmmm)
This is the Japanese Standard (1990) wiring. I can't speak for
other models and model years.
|
31.311 | | PHAROS::SAKELARIS | | Fri May 01 1992 09:03 | 6 |
| Damn, I guess I lost some brain cells and it shows here!
So the three pickups are never on at one time. Well hell I knew there
was something that didn't happen. Thanx dukes!
"sakman"
|
31.312 | it's those Gibson braincells | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Cosmic Tones for Mental Therapy | Fri May 01 1992 09:27 | 10 |
| Hey sakman, I believe you're thinking about the wiring on a three pickup
Les Paul Custom. Now to be honest, I don't remember exactly how it
goes myself, but it is kind of funky. I'm pretty sure there's an "all
three pickups on" mode and also no modes with just the middle. Can any
Gibson gurus (Danny?) help here?
The Strat modes described by dbII and others previously are the
standard wiring for most all stock Strats.
/rick
|
31.313 | | HEDRON::DAVE | Greetings ascending Star people! | Tue May 12 1992 12:32 | 15 |
| I recently did some pickup work on a couple of my guitars.
I pt an EMG-P in my squire p-bass, made all the difference in the world, the
bass sounds like a bass now, not some sort of clunky thing....
I replaced the EMG-81 in my ESP with an EMG-85. Much meatier ballsy tone. I dunno
what to do with the 81 now...
I bought, but did not install, EMG89/sa/sa for my steinberger. Stienberger get's
to install them since my burger only came with one pickup and no switch and
there's noone up here who I'd trust to do that work on it...the 89 is a
humbucker/single coil, the sounds of an 85 in humbucking mode and the sound of
an SA in single coil mode, all in the standard humbucking size pickup.
dbii
|
31.314 | | MARX::SAKELARIS | | Mon Jun 15 1992 13:42 | 32 |
| I finally made a modification to my non-traditional Strat. My Strat had
two humbuckers instead of three single coil pickups making it sound
more like a Les Paul than a Strat. For the Bridge pickup, thats fine
with me since I rarely used the bridge pickup in my previous Strat. I
find that pickup to be too thin. But I like the sound and flexibilty of
a Strat with the neck and middle pickups.
I modified my guitar by adding 2 Seymour Duncan 1/4 pounders in the
neck and middle position. Now, I have a Dimarzio Superdistortion
humbucker in the bridge position and the Duncans. To do this, I ordered
a pickguard from Music Emporium and was surprised to fine out that the
pickguard was not an exact replacement for my Strat. I had to cut some
at the tail end of the pickguard to allow for my tremolo assemly. Also,
the screw holes didn't line up.
Anyway, here's the thing about the new pickups. Its close to what I had
hoped for in making the modification, but I find the Duncans have more
of a sonic bandwidth. That is to say that they're definitely not as
midrange as traditional Strat PU's. Now thats either bad or good
depending upon personal preference. For me, I think its less than what
I hoped for as I wanted the Stevie Ray sound. Now I know Stevie isn't
known at all for using Seymour Duncans. I guess I just fell into the
philosophy that if some is good, more MUST be better. If a Strat pickup
is good, a 1/4 lb 'er offering more power must be better. Not so!
Not better, not worse, just different.
I like the modification. It does increase the flexibility of my guitar,
but I really think I wanted *that* strat sound. One other thing I noted
is that the duncans are a very good compliment to the Super Distortion
humbucker. I don't know if a traditiona Strat pickup would be.
"sakman"
|
31.315 | | MARX::SAKELARIS | | Thu Jun 25 1992 10:29 | 22 |
| So now for the past week or so I've been experimenting with the duncans
and as I said in my last, they seemed to sound different than I
expected. Then, last night I tried something else. I fooled with the
midrange setting on my amp. I had been playing with the midrange all
the way up thinking since that was the sound I was looking for, that
setting was the appropriate. I had tried adjusting the bass and treble
around the maxed midrange.
Well I'll be dipped in sh!t and called stinky - I backed off the
midrange and the guitar came alive. What I discovered is that the
midrange on my amp must be an active boost. With the knob pulled out,
the midrange circuitry is cut allowing the guitar itself to sound more
midrange.
Oh happy day! I'm in love again. The combination of this guitar and its
versatility, and the versatility of my "the Twin", I'm thinking maybe
to just play in the cellar ain't gonna make it. I might just have to start
thinking about playin in a band. Watch for an announcement as I take
this thought "to the mountain top".
"sakman"
|
31.316 | PICKUP INFO | MACNAS::KCOSGROVE | | Thu Aug 27 1992 07:36 | 23 |
| The other pickup notes didn't touch on what I'm looking for
so I'm adding this.
(Moderator, move this if you think appropriate)
Back in the 50's GRETCH used a particular type of pichup.
About 1.25 ins wide withe the adjustment screws directly behind the
poles. I have an old guitar with one on already and I'm looking for
another to restore to original.
I asked about the guitar (LEVIN) in another notes some months ago
but in my own research I've found out that LEVIN were bought out by
MARTIN in the late 60's early 70's.
None of the MARTINS seem to have the required pickup I want so I'm
wondering if anybody (DWEBER?) can put one in my direction.
If I can get any more info I'll post it
Thanks.
KEVIN
(I'm in GALWAY,IRELAND. Also another of the small band of people
leaving the company in the next month, but I\ve enjoyed my stay!)
rgds
|
31.317 | Baba D'Armond | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Ripablikans fore Kwael | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:15 | 18 |
| The pickups you describe are Dearmonds; they're single coils. I'm not
sure if you can still get these; Dearmond itself may not be in business
anymore. Then again, Gretsch has been doing a lot of re-issues lately
so they've got to be getting those old-style pickups from somewhere.
My advice is to contact Gretsch; I've seen an ad for their catalog
in recent Guitar Player mags. Also, old Martin electrics used these
so you might be able to scavenge one there (old Gretsch's are too
valuable to scavenge these days).
Just fyi, Gretsch changed from using the single coil Dearmonds to
their own design humbuckers, Filtertrons (cool name!), in the late
50's, about the same time as Gibson. These are relatively low output
jobs (by modern standards) with a sweet tone, much like a good Gibson
PAF. Pete Townshend was a big fan of these; the power chords in
"Baba O'Reilly" were done on a Filtertron equipped late 50's Gretsch
Chet Atkins.
/rick
|
31.318 | DeArmonds | RANGER::WEBER | | Thu Aug 27 1992 16:28 | 6 |
| Rick is correct about the DeArmonds. Gretsch's current lineup appears
to be all Filter'tron powered, so I doubt that they'll be able to help.
Your best bet is to call some vintage dealers. If you find one, don't
expect it to be cheap.
Danny W.
|
31.319 | Electric Guitar Pickups | MACNAS::KCOSGROVE | | Mon Aug 31 1992 03:26 | 4 |
| Thanks guys. I do realize these will not be cheap but I dont mind.
I'll let you know how I do before I go.
Kevin.
|
31.320 | Fender Texas Special | LEDS::BURATI | or maybe just a change of climate | Tue Sep 15 1992 16:01 | 9 |
| Anyone know anything about this new Fender pickup called the Texas
Special? They put 'em in the SRV Stratocaster. Their claimed to be a
regular single coil Strat PU with extra windings like (they say) many
'50's vintage strat pu's have due to inaccurate counters on the pu
winding jigs.
I'm thinking about dropping one into the bridge position ona '57 reissue
that I recently bought. The bridge PU seems a tad anemic, the other two
have plenty of balls.
|
31.321 | | E::EVANS | | Tue Sep 15 1992 16:04 | 5 |
|
I see Paul Reed Smith is now selling pickups.
jim
|
31.322 | | KDX200::COOPER | I even use TONE soap !! | Tue Sep 15 1992 16:14 | 3 |
| I thought PRS used DiMarzio pickups ??
Are they pulling an Ibanez now or what ?!?
|
31.323 | hotter than a jalapeno? | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Buckethead for president | Tue Sep 15 1992 16:16 | 10 |
| re .320
I tried a set of the "Texas Wound" pickups (or whatever they're called)
on a Custom Shop Strat recently. (If you're interested, it was that
white "Hendrix Re-issue" job in Wurlitzer, Framingham; still there last
time I went). They didn't strike me as anything special, but your
mileage may vary. They're also on the new SRV Signature Strat, if you
see one of those. I suggest try before you buy.
/rick
|
31.324 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | All over but the shouting | Tue Sep 15 1992 16:46 | 7 |
| >I thought PRS used DiMarzio pickups ??
PRS has been using their own pickups for several years now. I think
you can get DiMarzio's or anything else you want in there, but if it's
not one of their's it's a special order.
gh
|
31.325 | Too many turns? No problem... | BSS::STPALY::MOLLER | Fix it before it breaks | Tue Sep 15 1992 17:15 | 8 |
| Leo Fender modified sewing machines to wind pickup bobins back in the 50's
(In those days, you had to be creative), and there was a little counter
on the top to give you a rough idea how many turns there was on it. Getting
a few hundred extra turns was not improbable at all. I saw one of the
machines in Fullerton California back in the middle 1970's - they still
used it occasionally for prototype windings.
Jens
|
31.326 | | LEDS::BURATI | or maybe just a change of climate | Tue Sep 15 1992 17:34 | 25 |
| Jens,
Sewing machines, really? What a guy. My hero Leo was. The owner of The
American Guitar Center in Maryland (John Sprung?) told me that he owns
and uses Leo's original PU winding jig. I had him rewind an old '65 PU
for me on it for like $30 as couple years back. When I got it back I
quickly realized something that I had read in a guitar identification
book: that the old pickups were wound in the opposite direction from the
later ones. Oh well, I just swapped the wires.
This guy Sprung is quite a collector. His big thing is Tweed amps. He
also owns that fully functional (and heavy) one-of-a-kind lucite
stratocaster that Leo made as a sales prop. It was in a Guitar World
fold out a while back.
\rick,
Thanks, I'll check out on of those guits next week. Trouble is pickup
nuances are such...nuances. Trying to tell what a PU will do in your ax
and with your equipment from playing a guitar strung with .009s on some
wierd Princeton Chorus or something is next to impossible. But what the
heck, I'll try. Hell, someone's got to do it!
--Ron
|
31.327 | Texas Special | EARRTH::ABATELLI | Who knew? | Wed Sep 16 1992 08:49 | 16 |
| re.: .320
Personally and this is just my opinion, it may well give you the
"tone" and alittle more power and (from what I hear) should be
placed in the "neck" *and* "bridge" positions. The neck position
if you really want to get closer to that SRV tone. The bridge...
well, alot of different p/u's sound great in this position including
a Duncan vintage Hot Stack which has alittle more power and the bite
to match, plus it's extremely quiet compared to stock Fender p/u's.
Rock on,
Fred (Strat person who'd put that Texas Special p/u in the neck only
for that "tone").
P.S. BTW... how much is it?
|
31.328 | FWIW | IOSG::CREASY | I am on the case. I'm sharp. I'm kicking bottom | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:19 | 7 |
| RE: PRS pickups
They certainly make their own humbuckers. I'm pretty sure (though the
brain isn't what it once was :^) that the single-coil pickups used on
PRSs are Seymour Duncans...
Nick
|
31.329 | | LEDS::BURATI | or maybe just a change of climate | Wed Sep 16 1992 15:13 | 10 |
| .327
I have not trouble at all getting good stuff from the neck pu. I always
found SRV's sound pretty easily emulated. I've just found this unit's
bridge pu to be a tad bit light sounding. Doesn't sound like the signal
level is up where it's supposed to be. I've already raised it a touch
higher than the bridge pu on my '65. Idunno, maybe it's me ears...or me
brain for that matter (shaddup Buck!).
--Ron
|
31.330 | | LEDS::BURATI | or maybe just a change of climate | Wed Sep 16 1992 15:41 | 10 |
|
Fred,
>P.S. BTW... how much is it?
The new buyer's guide from GW doesn't show the Tex Spec. But all the
standard type Fender PU's list for $42. I'd guess that it would be close
to that if not the same.
--Ron
|
31.331 | Bill Lawrence L-500 | THAX01::NAGAHASHI | Put on your best dress darling | Sun Sep 27 1992 17:58 | 6 |
|
Has somebody tried a Bill Lawrence L-500? I'm very interested in it
since I saw Nuno Bettencourt(sp?) used it on his N4. Is it passive
pickup?
Kaz
|
31.332 | | LEDS::BURATI | I have a gub | Wed Nov 18 1992 20:27 | 5 |
| I got one question for yu-all:
What the HEY-ILL is a Lindy Fralin pickup? Huh?
--Ron
|
31.333 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Buckethead for president | Thu Nov 19 1992 07:47 | 18 |
| Lindy's a custom pickup rewinder specializing in restoring vintage stuff.
He's located in Richmond VA. Covers all the big guys - Fender, Gibson,
Gretsch, Rick, etc. and he'll do weird off-the wall stuff too if you
want. He's especially noted for his vintage Strat rewinds; lots of folks
regard them as the best (e.g., the guy from Kendricks Amps), although
this stuff is always a matter of religion. You can buy Fralin rewound
pickups outright too. Prices for pickups and rewind jobs are competitive
with Duncan, etc.
You probably don't hear much about him because he hasn't gone the
high profile high volume route like Duncan, Van Zandt, etc. but
he's well known and highly regarded in the vintage guitar world.
If I needed a vintage replacement pickup, he's one of the first
people I'd talk to.
Last phone# I had was 804-358-2699
/rick
|
31.334 | | LEDS::BURATI | This vacuum sucks! | Mon Dec 21 1992 15:23 | 29 |
| pickup angst
Dear Abby,
I've decided that the pickups on my '65 Strat are substancially stronger
in the midrange frequencies than the standard single coils on my '57
reissue made in '84. Conversely, the '57 reissue's pickups sound a bit
more open, brighter. They sound nice and everything, but they seem
unable to drive the input on my preamp as well as my other guitars do.
(such bad grammer, I know) The neck and middle PUs on the old Strat are
original (dated march-65 on the bottom of the bobbin), whilst I replaced
the bridge PU around '69 or '70 with an off-the-shelf replacement from
Fender. A great sounding (and playing) guitar.
So I'm thinking of replacing the pickups in the '57 reissue with
Seymores or maybe one of Fender's newer single coils like Texas
Specials. I have one Duncan already, though it's a left handed one, and
I'm VERY PLEASED with the '54 replacement in my '54 Tele.
And then there are these things that Fender just calls Custom single
coils that they use on the Robert Cray signature. Oh me, oh my.
So Texas Special or Seymore Duncan...
...Texas Special or Seymore Duncan...
...Texas Special or Seymore Duncan...
--Ron (Fender guy)
|
31.335 | so many pickups... | RICKS::CALCAGNI | L'Angelo Minestronio | Mon Dec 21 1992 15:45 | 35 |
| Dear Ron Fender Guy,
You obviously have a bad case of vintage GTS. I would like to be able
to help you, but I'm afraid I may only further confuse the issue. I
personally have not found either the Seymours or the Fender Texas
Specials to be entirely satisfactory for the sound you describe.
A couple of other suggestions:
Lindy Fralins - I know you asked about these before. I've never heard
em but they are very highly spoken of among vintage Strat
enthusiasts. He'll go so far as to have a 50's wind, an early 60's
wind, a late 60's wind, etc. Worth a look, I believe I already posted
the number somewhere. Note that Fralins are starting to show up on high
end Strat copies, so he may be starting to go big a la Seymour.
Van Zandts - Some blues players I know in Boston (Rick Russell for one)
swear by these. Probably the best vintage Strat repro pickup I've
tried, better imo than the Seymour Alnico Pros, which were my
previous favorite.
Joe Bardens - non-traditional dual blade types that nevertheless are
supposed to offer true vintage tone with the advantages of
humbucking. As most people know, Danny Gatton is big on the Tele
versions, but I've seen more blues players using the Strats as well
these days.
Evans - Canadian made, the pickup of Jeff Healey. Jeff's tone knocked
me out a couple of years ago at Nightstage, so I've always been
curious about them. Again, not a traditional look if that's
important.
Oh yeah, for my money the Robert Cray pickups sounded better than the
SRV ones, but then again that may have been the guitar.
/rick
|
31.336 | | LEDS::BURATI | This vacuum sucks! | Mon Dec 21 1992 16:43 | 5 |
| As always, rick, you're a veritable fountain of information.
Thanks,
--Ron
|
31.337 | | LEDS::BURATI | This vacuum sucks! | Mon Dec 28 1992 16:01 | 5 |
| Over the weekend I dropped the pickups from my basketcase '62 strat into
my '57 reissue. The guitar now has a markedly different sound. Not as
bright, more in the mids and definately more output.
--Ron
|
31.338 | | DECWIN::KMCDONOUGH | Set Kids/Nosick | Thu Jan 14 1993 10:32 | 8 |
|
I have an old Duncan humbucker that just says DC/B. I'm assuming this
means "Duncan Custom/Bridge? Is this a fairly old model or does Duncan
still make the "Duncan Custom"?
Kevin
|
31.339 | Wanna sell it? | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Big cheese, MAKE me! | Thu Jan 14 1993 12:51 | 4 |
| Yes, Duncan still makes the Custom. It's similar to what Dimarzio
calls a PAF Pro.
gh
|
31.340 | | DECWIN::KMCDONOUGH | Set Kids/Nosick | Thu Jan 14 1993 13:02 | 14 |
|
The Duncan is in the bridge position of the 'Paul I just bought. I'm
inclined to keep it although to my ears it doesn't have the sound of
the Jeff Beck humbucker that I'm used to.
The guitar also has a Dimarzio in the neck position. No model number
on that puppy at all. It just says Dimarziosomethingorother on the
bottom of the pickup.
Kevin
|
31.341 | Trembucker problem | JITORI::NAGAHASHI | Put on your best dress darling | Mon Apr 12 1993 18:16 | 18 |
|
I've been trying several pickups for my YAMAHA YG-1221 and already
decided to put a DiMarzio PAF into neck and a Fast Track 2 into middle.
For bridge position I've tried PAF pro, FRED and JB. All of theese 3
pickups are F-spaced or Trembucker. These pickups were very good but I
think I'd like to install them into other guitars if I could find more
suitable pickup for bridge position on a YG and these pickup combinations.
Yesterday I bought a TB-5/Duncun Custom Trembucker for next attempting
and did the replacing work last night. When I was going to install a
TB-5 into pickguard I noticed that the pickup was too wide to put into
the rectangle hole of the pickguard. Should I cut the pickguard or
should I back TB-5 to shop?
I think the hole is not small because my another YG was installed
EMG-85 in the same rectangle hole.
Kaz
|
31.342 | My opinion: Buy another pickguard | LUNER::KELLYJ | submit to Barney | Tue Apr 13 1993 07:21 | 9 |
| Hi Kaz,
I'd vote for getting another pickguard and experimenting with that one,
preserving the one that came with your guitar. Here in the States
pickguards are about $20 to $30 US. You can get them for almost any
guitar or you can get blanks and make your own.
I think modifying pickguards is a great way to get into working on
electric guitars.
|
31.343 | | HOPOFF::TAKOS | | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:00 | 16 |
| -2
How do you like the Dimarzio FT2, I was thinking of using the either the ft2 or
an SD hot rails for a brifge replacement on my Ibanez blade
I also have a SD 1/4 lb in the bridge which i'm thinking of putting in the neck
pos. I'm considering a HS-2 for the middle.
wadda you guys think. I know someone else has played this game before...
Do you like how it sounds, i'm especially curious to hear how the 1/4 lb will
sound in the neck pos...
thanks,
Nick
|
31.344 | FT2, HR | JITORI::NAGAHASHI | CPT/PSC KAZUNARI NAGAHASHI | Wed Oct 13 1993 19:45 | 17 |
|
>How do you like the Dimarzio FT2, I was thinking of using the either the ft2 or
>an SD hot rails for a brifge replacement on my Ibanez blade
I could not say much comment on FT2 because I've tried it for the middle
position only. In my impression, FT2 is very similar sounding to typical
Humbucker like a PAF and output level is also similar. Interesting point
which is different from a typical Humbucekr is a picking response. It is
compressed like a sound via compressor.
I also attempted to put a SD/HR for the same position on the same
guitar. It is much powerful than a FT2 and it also has the edge. I
think it is suitable pickup for people who need a single coil sound with
MEGA power. The advantage of single size humbucker is that you will not
get a noise like the real single-coils or other normal size humbuckers.
Kaz.
|
31.345 | which pickups in '78 LP Custom? | EZ2GET::STEWART | always took candy from strangers | Mon Dec 06 1993 15:18 | 10 |
|
Anybody know which pickups Gibson installed in LP Customs in '78? I
just noticed that both PUs in my LP are Dimarzios -- I knew *one* was a
replacement when I bought it 10 years ago, but that wasn't important at
the time. Now that I'm cleaning this puppy up for sale, the pickup
complement has assumed new importance. If anyone has some Gibson
pickups they'd like to sell, let me know. Otherwise, I'll go buy
whatever Gibson installed, if they're still available.
|
31.346 | PAF? | NAVY5::SDANDREA | If mistakes were dollars.... | Tue Dec 07 1993 07:20 | 6 |
| re: -1
I 'think' they were the '78 version of PAF's by Gibson. Only your
Weber will know for sure.....
8)
|
31.347 | | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Better the devil you know | Tue Dec 07 1993 08:11 | 3 |
| Are they full size or mini humbuckers?
Dave
|
31.348 | can't take you guys anywhere.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | If mistakes were dollars.... | Tue Dec 07 1993 08:28 | 7 |
| >>Are they full size or mini humbuckers?
HEY! Pay attention! Only Les Paul deluxe models have the mini's!!
Bass players.......sheesh!
:*}
|
31.349 | But it's not the size that counts, right? | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Better the devil you know | Tue Dec 07 1993 08:30 | 5 |
| > Bass players.......sheesh!
Hey, pal, compared to *my* humbucker, they're ALL mini's!
Hmph.
|
31.350 | Texas style hardware.... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | If mistakes were dollars.... | Tue Dec 07 1993 09:14 | 6 |
| re: -1
True, Dave, true.......isn't one of your pickups about the size of
Connecticut?
8*}
|
31.351 | But from Virginia, they're close in size... | NWACES::HICKERNELL | Better the devil you know | Tue Dec 07 1993 09:44 | 5 |
| > Connecticut?
Rhode Island. That Music Man had one the size of Connecticut.
Dave
|
31.352 | '78 LP pickups | RANGER::WEBER | | Tue Dec 08 1992 08:27 | 9 |
| A '78 LP Custom would have had standard gold-plated humbuckers. Gibson
also had higher output models called "Series VII" or something like
that--these were standard on the 25/50 and L-5S and optional on LPs.
Current standard humbuckers or PAFs, or even a combination of the two,
would be appropriate replacements.
Danny W.
|
31.353 | ever thought about opening a 900 number? | EZ2GET::STEWART | always took candy from strangers | Tue Dec 08 1992 08:35 | 5 |
|
Thanks, Danny, that's just the info I needed!
|
31.354 | Stewart Mac has Gibson Pickups | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Tue Dec 08 1992 10:00 | 4 |
| BTW, Gibson pickups are available through Stewart MacDonald.
The number is listed in the Manufacturers Adres note.
Mark
|
31.355 | | LEDS::BURATI | Well I crossed my old man back in Oregon | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:55 | 4 |
| Jeepers, over the last few weeks I've been successfully fighting this
jones to experiment with new pickups in my '57 Vintage Reissue
Stratocaster and the new Guitar Player arrives with a cover story on 45
different pickups! I'm cooked. help.
|
31.356 | life is short | EZ2GET::STEWART | Death before disco | Wed Mar 02 1994 08:57 | 5 |
|
Why not just do it? Just don't make any irreversible mods...
|
31.357 | | GOES11::HOUSE | Aren't you glad I asked? | Wed Mar 02 1994 09:12 | 8 |
| The problem I've always had with replacement pickups is that they're
expensive, sometimes as much as $80 *each*, and you can't really try
them out before you buy 'em! There's no way to really do a valid A/B
comparison, since every guitar sounds different, so what do you do?
Read the hype descriptions the manufacturers put out and play "pin the
pickup on the guitar" hoping it works out?
Greg (who's had a few he liked, a few he didn't)
|
31.358 | | LEDS::BURATI | Well I crossed my old man back in Oregon | Wed Mar 02 1994 13:23 | 3 |
| Right. Trying to decide if PU 'A' might be too hot or if 'B' is not hot
enough from manfacturer descriptions gives me the hesitation blues. The
last thing I want is a few more (expensive) pickups lying about.
|
31.359 | reverse wound middle pickup | LEDS::BURATI | Doppler radar junkie | Mon May 16 1994 15:15 | 31 |
| Whilste watching the Maple Leafs beat the Sharks this weekend I decided
to perform yet another hideous experiment on my '57 reissue Strat. You
see, I've had this lefty Seymore Duncan vintage replacement pickup
(SSL-1L I think) kicking about for a few years. I had noticed some time
ago that it is reverse-wound and I had read that the really cool pickups
that come in sets of 3 usually include a reverse-wound/reverse-polarity
middle pickup for hum cancelling in the 2 combo positions on a Strat.
The only difference is that pole piece heights are also reversed on this
thing, i.e. the short magnet which is usuall on the B string is on the A
string. So what, I thought. So I decided to install it during the 2nd
intermission. (OK, it's not all that hideous.)
It sounds pretty good, but the 2 and 4 positions are quite different in
the upper midrange from my stock '65 unit, that is the mids are more
scooped out than before. To put it another way, there isn't as much
upper midrange bite in the 2 and 4 combo positions with the
reverse-wound middle pickup.
The pickup by itself sounds nearly identical to the stock middle pickup
in my '65. After dicking with the height and setting the amp tones a
little different I liked the different sound. So I decided to keep the
guitar setup this way.
regarding hum: no hum in the 2 and 4 switch positions. Very quiet.
To sum up: hum cancelling works well but I suspect that using
reverse-wound/reverse-polarity middle pickups changes the 2 and 4
position sound significantly. The result, however, isn't bad, just
different.
And the Maple Leafs won and go to play Vancouver.
|
31.360 | DeArmonds anyone! | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Mon Jun 06 1994 22:18 | 26 |
| Okay, all you old Pickup Gurus, can someone give me a little history
on DeArmond pickups. I've seen DeArmond pickups on everything from
cheap Harmonies to top of the line Gretches. They seems to be the
pickup of choice among Dobro players. I'm referring the the wafer-
thin DeArmond pickups that were made 25-30 years ago. A friend of
mine has 2 of these, but he refuses to sell me one of them. He
let me borrow one to try on my Dobro and basically had to pry it
away from me. There was an ad in Vintage Guitar magazine recently
about a "reissue" of this old style DeArmond pickup which was
selling for $175 (ouch).
I've also seen DeArmond acoustic guitar pickups that attached to
the soundhole and had built-in volume controls. These were not
quite as desirable, but were probably the only game in town 30
years ago for acoustic guitars.
The Harmony Rocket II that I bought recently has a pair of the
wafer-thin DeArmonds on it. These are really cool looking pickups
with a thin gold-plated mesh behind a chrome frame. They also
sound great.
Any info on old DeArmonds would be appreciated.
Mark
|
31.361 | Chrome or Nickel? | SAHQ::ROSENKRANZ | Go ask Alice.... | Tue Jul 05 1994 10:45 | 7 |
| I'm contemplating ordering a set of "standard" Humbuckers. They
apparently come with chrome or nickel (as well as others) covers.
Can anyone shed any light on why I might want chrome vs nickel. Is
is just a cosmetic thing? Will they affect sound? Will chrome be
more resistant to scratching etc?
jim
|
31.362 | flip a coin? | RICKS::CALCAGNI | really useful engine | Tue Jul 05 1994 11:36 | 15 |
| Gibson's up to 1964 or so had nickel plated hardware, then they
changed to chrome. Some of the re-issues (like 80's dot 335s)
used nickel again to get the vintage look. Other than cosmetics,
there is no reason to go with one vs the other; get whatever matches
your existing hardware (or suits your fancy).
Nickel tarnishes easier, but many people like the look of nickel better
anyway. If you don't know how to tell, nickel gives off a slight
yellowish overtone to reflections, chrome a slight blue. Easiest way
to see the difference is to look at a known nickel and a known chrome
piece side by side; it's subtle, but you should be able to tell the
difference
/iron_man
|
31.363 | more info you didn't ask for | RICKS::CALCAGNI | really useful engine | Tue Jul 05 1994 11:41 | 9 |
| btw, latest word on cool PAF replacements is supposed to be Tom Holmes
pickups. These are hand wound versions of the current Gibson '57
re-issue PAFs (Tom did some consulting work on these) but the covers
are cosmetically closer to real 50's PAFs than the Gibsons. Real nice.
Has anyone seen or tried the Duncan Antiquities?
/seth
|
31.364 | trouble maker | LEDS::BURATI | boss burrito | Tue Jul 05 1994 18:59 | 0 |
31.365 | FLS Red, Silver, Blue = Tone Happiness | POBOX::PATLA | Elvis Sells DECpc's at Digital! | Sat Jul 09 1994 11:41 | 14 |
| Well I just install 3 new pickups in my 83 Start
Neck Blue Fender Lace Sensor
Mid Silver Fender Lace Sensor
Bridge Red Fender Lace Sensor
I am extremely happy at how quiet the pickups are the range of tones I
now get.
The stock piuckups were thin and this is the setup that only has one
tone control. I am going to replace the tone control with a TBX tone
control as soon as I can get my hands on one.
Happy with my GTS purchase
|
31.366 | Seymour Duncon newsgroup post regarding pickup height | BLADE::ANDRE | I think, therefore I am, I think | Tue Oct 18 1994 08:15 | 22 |
| The famous Seymour W. Duncan posts to rec.music.makers.guitar:
Article 31163 of rec.music.makers.guitar:
From: [email protected] (SeymourwD)
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar
Subject: Re: Adjusting Pickup Height
Date: 17 Oct 1994 18:06:04 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 8
Sender: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf01.news.aol.com
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Brandon
Corey) writes:
Press the strings down on the last fret and the Bridge pickup should be
adjusted about 1/16" from the strings. The neck pickup should be adjusted
1/8" on each side. If the bass is still too full, just lower it another
1/16" to 1/8". Let go of the strings (from the last fret) and it should
work pretty good for you. good luck. Seymour W. Duncan
|
31.367 | Seymour on: The Telecaster Sound | BLADE::ANDRE | I think, therefore I am, I think | Tue Oct 18 1994 08:20 | 48 |
| Article 31159 of rec.music.makers.guitar:
From: [email protected] (SeymourwD)
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar
Subject: Re: Can you make Strat sound like Tele?
Date: 17 Oct 1994 17:45:02 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 15
Sender: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf01.news.aol.com
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (David Morning)
writes:
The Telecaster has a ferrous bottom or elevator plate which is copper
plated to keep it from rusting and ease in soldering the beginning wire of
the pickup to ground. The bridge plate is also steel and surrounds the
pickup and pulls the magnetic field from the pickup out further from the
pickup. The bottom plate pushes the magnetic field up towards the
strings. The magnet is in the pickup to magnetize the strings which move
within the magnetic field and generate an alternating current to the
amplifier. I have made similar pickups for the Stratocaster for players
like Jerry Donahue and Jeff Beck. We made special plates for the Strat
pickup to simulate the field of a Telecaster. The angle of the Telecaster
pickup is different from the Strat too. The bridge plate and bridge
saddles help contribute the tone of a Telecaster. Good luck.. SWD
Article 31166 of rec.music.makers.guitar:
Path: jac.zko.dec.com!crl.dec.com!crl.dec.com!caen!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swiss.ans.net!newstf01.cr1.aol.com!newsbf01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: [email protected] (SeymourwD)
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar
Subject: Re: Can you make Strat sound like Tele?
Date: 17 Oct 1994 18:19:08 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Lines: 6
Sender: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf01.news.aol.com
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
writes:
The American made Jerry Donahue guitars use pickups made by Seymour Duncan
and the Japanese JD guitars use Japanese pickups with a slightly different
wiring. SWD
|
31.368 | A pick me up | GIDDAY::KNIGHTP | There's room for you inside | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:53 | 18 |
|
A mate had to borrow my amp and effects to do a gig so he came
over the other night to pick the stuff up and do a quick run through
on the gear, he brought his own guitar.
He has got EMG SA81 pickups in it. Boy do these things sound
different to the Gold lace sensor pickups in my Strat.
Anyone had any experience with putting these type of pickups into
a normal strat. They have the battery mounted such that if you need
to change it you would have to remove the pickguard and strings( not
such a great idea if it goes down during a gig)
Im not sure about having someone route out my guitar though.
Does anyone else use the Fender Golden Lace sensor pickups?
They just seem a bit bland to me.
P.K.
|
31.369 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | anti-EMM! anti-EMM! I hate expanded memory!- Dorothy | Wed Dec 21 1994 06:30 | 5 |
| SA81's are screaming little pickups...I have one in my ESP. I routed
my strat myself a few years back, it's scary to hack up a guitar but I had
practiced on my lead 1 before that....use a sharp (very sharp) bit and be careful.
dbii
|
31.370 | Red, blue and Gold sensors | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:10 | 12 |
| I have a tele with blue and red lace at the neck and bridge. I got
them because I wanted something a little hotter than the vintage sound
which is what the gold lace emulates. I actually like the sound of the
blue lace which emulates the humbucker and is a little more versitle
than the red sensor.
I wouldn't have any problem hacking out under the pickguard as long as
you keep all the old parts so you won't lose your resale value if you
want to sell the guitar some day. Even though the lace sensors didn't
require any cutting I still kept old parts just in case.
Mark
|
31.371 | | GIDDAY::KNIGHTP | There's room for you inside | Wed Dec 21 1994 14:51 | 6 |
| re -2 Thanks
Does anyone know the diffference between the 81 and 85 (and dont
say 4).
P.K.
|
31.372 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | anti-EMM! anti-EMM! I hate expanded memory!- Dorothy | Thu Dec 22 1994 07:24 | 8 |
| Yes. I have both...
The 85 is a fairly standard PAF-like pickup. The 81 is hotter and has a slightly
enhanced high end and high mid output. I like the 81 much better than the 85,
which I removed after trying it in place of the 81 and have as yet, not decided
what to do with it.
dbii
|
31.373 | Santa maybe? | GIDDAY::KNIGHTP | There's room for you inside | Thu Dec 22 1994 14:32 | 4 |
| -1
You could give it to me......8^).
P.K.
|
31.374 | | GOES11::HOUSE | How could I have been so blind? | Tue Dec 27 1994 12:39 | 24 |
| I'll have to disagree. I thought I'd posted a reply about this in here
before, but perhaps my lousy modem connection went south on me (as many
of them have the last few days).
81s are ok...if it's all you have in your guitar. It's totally
unsuited for mixing with anything else in a set because it's WAY TOO
BRIGHT. I had two different sets of EMGs with an 81 and 2 SAs and the
SAs sounded dark and muddy if you set up the amp so that the 81 sounded
right. Conversely if you set up the tone controls on the amp for the
SAs, the 81 would CUT YOUR HEAD OFF! Therefore, I could only use that
one pickup if I was playing that guitar. I took 'em out and sold 'em.
I haven't used an 85, but from the description, it sounds like it'd
have a better tonal balance for mixing in pickup sets. Like I say, the
81s simply don't (unless you *like* switching to a lead pickup that's
really REALLY bright, I don't).
The 81 works fine in a single pickup guitar, since you can set your amp
for it and not worry about what happens when you switch pickups. But
IMHO, the 81 is a HEAVY METAL pickup, and really isn't very good for
much of anything else. Sounds thin and compressed to my ear. I
believe I'd prefer an 85 or an 89.
Greg
|
31.375 | spanning the globe... | RICKS::CALCAGNI | more zip stupid juice | Tue May 09 1995 14:34 | 19 |
| Pickup news...
I found out the deal on those Seymour Duncan "Seth Lover" models;
they're just Antiquity PAFs without the phony aging and dirt from
Seymour's back yard. A nice idea, unless you actually believe that
business about dirty pickups sounding better :-) The Antiquity's seem
to be current state-of-the-art in PAF repros, although I did hear a
usually reliable source tell me he liked the Fralin PAFs even better.
An interesting item re Gibson P-100s; these are stacked-humbucking
versions of the P-90, used on current Gibsons that use a P-90 style
pickup. I found out a common mod on these (at least around Boston)
is to disconnect the hum-cancelling coil; apparently, a lot of players
think a castrated P-100 sounds better and is worth the noise problems.
These are still not as phat as Gibson's own real P-90 re-issues or
similar from Duncan, but it is a less expensive alternative. As I
said, this is common mod around town so it appears to be more than
just a few flakes (maybe it's lot of flakes?).
|
31.376 | neuter those pickups! | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Wed May 10 1995 09:34 | 5 |
| I wouldn't refer to these as castrated. Perhaps vasectemy would be a
better term, since the mod is reversable :^)
Mark
|
31.377 | close, very close... | RICKS::CALCAGNI | more zip stupid juice | Tue May 30 1995 13:23 | 20 |
| Quick report from the lab. A bunch of us mad scientists got together
over the weekend to do some pickup testing. We had two of the Seymour
Duncan Antiquity PAFs and one "real" PAF; the testbench was a '63 SG.
All three pickups measured within 100 ohms of each other (8.3 - 8.4k).
The Duncans were of course "aged"; one of em had this green crap all
over it and looked like it had spent a week in Seymour's toilet tank.
We popped each one into the bridge position of the SG, ran it through
several amps of various flavors, and listened. The Seymours do indeed
sound good, but when we plugged in the original PAF it was like someone
threw a switch and turned the lights on. Thicker, wider, more open;
more of everything. I've only played real PAFs a couple of times now
but each time it was the same experience. They just sound the way a
pickup ought to.
I'd still recommend the Antiquities; they're one of the best PAF repros
I've heard. But the originals are still the real deal.
/rick
|
31.378 | might ax with micky mouse pu's | POLAR::BACKS | | Mon Jun 12 1995 12:42 | 25 |
| NEED HELP BADLY!!!!!
Hello guitar buffs,
It's taken me several months to go through all the comments in this
section seeing I only have a little time each week. First thing I've
noticed, is that alot of you people play strat's. Not many Gibson
specialist out there stateside. I've really enjoyed reading all of your
wisdom,now maybe someone can help me. I have a '63 Gibson SG. It is all
original and I want to keep it that way. My problem is that my ax
sounds really good but a little to timid for my liking. I play in a
band and we do alot of our own material. Sort of a cross between
Santana and Van Halen mix. Everything is fine but now we are going to
be doing some work in the recording studio and my ax has alot of hum
coming from it. I do believe the original pu's are p90's. What do you
suggest I try. Keep in mind that I don't want to have to cut the pick
guard and second I live in Ottawa Canada. I just about sh!t myself
when I read how much pu's are going for in the states. Up here they
are about triple that price.
BTW-I read just a little back about p100'a and these PAF pu's. What
the h@ll are PAF? From the sounds of that note the PAF are kickers
compared to the P100's. Don't forget I can't afford to buy pick-ups
up here for $180 each just to find out that they have no balls.
Any info is muchly appreciated....
might ax with micky mouse pu's
|
31.379 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | more zip stupid juice | Mon Jun 12 1995 13:15 | 26 |
| PAFs are a short name for original Gibson humbuckers from the late 50's
and early 60's. This style and size pickup has been commonly used on Gibsons
ever since, although technically only the early ones are true PAFs.
Your P90s are single coils; there is no way to install a PAF style
humbucker into your guitar without cutting wood. I'm guessing you don't
want to do this. Mini-humbuckers, used on 60's Epiphones and 70's Les
Paul Deluxes and (another variant) on some Firebirds will fit nicely
into your SG. These pickups will have more power than the P90s, but
may sound a little more raspy and brittle; it's just something you'd
have to try. Seymour Duncan and probably some others offer a few
different versions of these.
Also, awhile back DiMarzio made a PAF style humbucker in a special
soapbar-style package, especially for retro-fitting P90 Gibsons. Don't
know if these are still being made; they would sound thicker and fuller
than the mini-humbuckers.
Gibson's P100 is a humbucking replacement for the P90, but I don't
believe it is intended to provide more gain; the idea is to have a P90
sound with less noise. Probably not what you want.
Good luck
/rick
|
31.380 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | more zip stupid juice | Mon Jun 12 1995 13:19 | 5 |
| Oh, one more thing. To mount mini-humbuckers in your SG you'll need
a special type of mounting ring as used on Les Paul Deluxes; shouldn't
be impossible but might be tricky to find (Seymour may even provide
these already).
|
31.381 | One or two boxes of Kraft dinner with that pu | POLAR::BACKS | | Tue Jun 13 1995 06:38 | 15 |
| Rick,
Thanks alot,this is exactly what type of info I was looking for. Your
right,I'm definately looking for a pu with more gain and sustain. I'm
going to call around this afternoon to find out if DiMarzio still makes
these pu's and if they do,find out how much they are. I'll let you know
the price of them up here.
If you can think of any more pu's that might slide in and have the
punch I'm looking for let me know.
Thanks again,
more toys,less money
P.S. Now the only problem is justifying this to the wife. Kraft dinner
isn't so bad as long as you don't eat it every night.
|
31.382 | Fire that Bird up! | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Tue Jun 13 1995 08:08 | 4 |
| I'd stick a Firebird Pickup in the neck position. You just can't
beat those Firebird mini-hummers, especially in the neck position.
Mark
|
31.383 | Soapbar replacement | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Tue Jun 13 1995 09:37 | 5 |
| More info to add to reply .379. The DiMarzio pickup that replaces
the vintage "soapbar" and Mini-Humbuckers is the DLX Plus DP154.
They go for $84.00 stateside.
Mark
|
31.384 | Still wondering! | POLAR::BACKS | | Tue Jun 13 1995 12:57 | 15 |
| Mark,
This Firebird pick-up. Will this fit right into my guitar or will I
have to cut? If so then it is no good for me as I want to keep the old
pick-up and when and if I sell it,I'll put the old pick-up back in.
I'll let you know about the price of the DiMarzio DLX plus DF154 here
if they even carry it any more. I might have to order it but that's ok.
I know this is probably not the place for this but I use effect pedals
and I was wondering if anyone out there has heard of the Camelean
(can't spell I know) effects rack? If so about how much are they out
there and is there a place in the states close to me where I can get
one?
Thanks again,
Bob
|
31.385 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | more zip stupid juice | Tue Jun 13 1995 13:43 | 5 |
| I don't think you'll have to cut, but you may have to get a special
mounting ring a la Les Paul Deluxe. The Firebird mini-hummers and the
Deluxe style mini-hummers are the same size.
/rick
|
31.386 | putting a toe in the ground plug. | POLAR::BACKS | | Wed Jun 14 1995 07:55 | 19 |
| Good morning,good morning,good morning,
I haven't had a chance to call around yet. If I find out that I have
to order these pickups and they can't give me a time of when they will
arrive,is there anything I can do in the meantime to fix my problem?
Such as rewiring the ground to the pickups,or anything. I have already
taken a quick peak at the insides. It is really dusty and I bought this
special cleaner to clean all the connections but that hasn't done any
good so far. Are there any other suggestions to get rid of the crazy
hum. About the only thing that I can do is use my other guitar players
Gibson RD standard for now for recording. It is a beautiful guitar
and talk about balls,it screams but I find the body too big and I have
a hard time damping the strings in trying to control it. It probably
isn't the guitar but just me not being use to it. But any suggestions
would be much appreciated.
Rock on...........
Bob
|
31.387 | Still looking | POLAR::BACKS | | Thu Jun 15 1995 10:46 | 29 |
| Hello boys,
Just got off the phone with Steve's music here in Ottawa. I asked
about pick-ups for my ax. He told me that Semour Duncan Vintage Soapbar
pick-ups were about the same as Firebird mini-humbuckers and they
are having their 30th aniversary sale so I could get them for about
$84.95 each which is a really good price here in Canada. I also asked
him about the DiMarzio dlx plus dp154 pick-ups but he said that they
were not listed in his computer nor in the catalogue. He didn't
actually say that they were discontinued,just that they were not
listed for him. Can somebody see if they are still available in
the states. He said that the SD's were really hot and that they
also had SD Hot Soapbar's for the neck position. I don't know
about that. I wouldn't think that I would put a hotter pick-up
in the neck position than a pick-up in the bridge. To me that
would make it very distorted and very woofy (for lack of a better
word) sounding. What do you think? I also called another place
but there was only one guy working today and I have to call him
back for the price of the pick-ups but he said they would be
around $125 or in that neighbourhood. The only problem with Steve's
is that they don't have any in stack at their store and there is
none at the store in Montreal either. If I was to order them he said
it could possibly take a couple of months before they would come in
and also I would have to go down and put a 10% deposit which is alright
by me. But before I do anything I figured I would see what your
response was.
Let me know.
Bob
|
31.388 | Canada Distributer | NOTAPC::HARPER | | Thu Jun 15 1995 11:57 | 4 |
| The distributer in Canada for DiMarzio pickups is SK Music at
514-633-8877
Mark
|
31.389 | More on SD and FIrebird PU's | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Mon Jun 19 1995 09:46 | 25 |
|
I disagree that a vintage soapbar pickups will sound the same as a
Firebird Pickup. A soapbar pickup (by definition) is a single coil
pickup, not a hummer. Firebird Pickups are specially designed and
sound like no other pickup. I would either check into getting a set
from Gibson, or check out the Seymour Duncan Firebird pickups. I
believe SD also sells the surround rings which are chrome plated to
match the pickups. I've heard that these are almost identical to the
Gibson Firebird Pickups.
Your mileage may vary. I agree that you should use the same style
pickups in both the neck and bridge position for balance. I think
you'll find the Firebird pickups have plenty of gain, very sweet
tone, and won't sound muddy in the neck position.
I seem to recall a deal where you can purchase the pickups directly
from SD, and if you are not satisfied with the sound, you can swap
them for another model pickup. SD also makes the standard mini-hummers
that were used on Les Paul deluxes, and other Gibson models. These
would also fit into a P90 rout. I'm not sure if the direct-sales
approach is available to Canadian customers. It wouldn't hurt to call
SD. Their California number is 805-964-9610. They have a tech support
line at the factory to answer any questions you may have.
Mark
|
31.390 | Still looking | POLAR::BACKS | | Tue Jun 20 1995 14:21 | 7 |
| Sorry boys that it's taken me so long to get back to ya but this note
file was out of order for the last couple of days. I think you are
right with your advice about the Firebird pickups being better. I will
try to see if I can get them here in Canada. I'll let you know what
happens in a couple of days.
Bo
|
31.391 | Good, better, best! | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Wed Jun 21 1995 10:15 | 17 |
| Better is a relative term. Some folks like P90's better than other
pickups. All I'm saying is that your' guitar already has soap-bar
pickups. Replacing them with "Vintage Soap-bars" will have little
or no affect on your tone. Switching to a humbucker with more gain
will. There are few choices in mini-hummers that will fit the P90
rout on your guitar.
I've owned several Gibsons over the years, and I presently have
5 or 6 in my possesion. My Firebird V wins the tone competition
by a sizeable margin. I have 3 guitars with full-sized humbuckers
but I prefer the tone of the 'bird over all of em. I usually play
the Firebird through a Deluxe Reverb amp. No channel switching, no
gain controls, just pure Fender tube tone. The Firebird brings out
the best in this amp, providing nice clean sweet tone when you
play soft, and gnarly distortion when you dig in.
Mark
|
31.392 | uncovered humbuckers | GAVEL::DAGG | | Tue Dec 12 1995 05:54 | 16 |
|
Sorry if this is already discussed in the previous
391 replies, but:
How does removing the pickup covers on for example
humbuckers in a Les Paul effect the sound? I've
heard people say it makes for more "distortion", and
I remember the Dimarzio super-distort pickups had
no covers, but I've also seen pickups on a "jazz"
guitar without covers in pictures of Borys guitars.
I believe these were Armstrong (?) pickups.
THanks!
Dave
|
31.393 | 6 or a half dozen? | WEDOIT::ABATELLI | In Pipeline Heaven | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:59 | 12 |
| RE: Uncovered pickups
I've heard that the high end response increases slightly without
covers. Not enough for me to make a determination though in hearing
two Les Paul customs (one with and another without covers). Distortion
increase? I'd say not much to be a BIG difference IMO.
Rock on,
Fred (who's had Les Pauls with and without covers)
|
31.394 | something else then? | GAVEL::DAGG | | Tue Dec 12 1995 11:09 | 9 |
|
RE: -1. If its not the covers, then is
a "super-distortion" pickup one with a
higher than usual "gain" (?) or "output"
from the pickup?
Dave - who wishes he's been a EE instead
of CSCI sometimes!
|
31.395 | Les in a box | RICKS::CALCAGNI | Fast, Cheap, Good: choose any two | Tue Dec 12 1995 12:00 | 13 |
| Super-Distortion was the product name of an early DiMarzio humbucker.
It claimed to have higher output than most other humbuckers on the
market at the time. Increasing the output of a pickup is accomplished
by increasing the number of coil windings and/or the strength of the
magnets, and it's part religion part science as to what yields the
best results. The Super-Distortion came out at a time when
aftermarket pickups were still a new idea, and this product sort
of launched DiMarzio as a major company. Larry DiMarzio has said
that part of what he was trying to achieve with the Super-Distortion
was a pickup that would imitate Leslie West's searing tone.
/rick
|