T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
7.1 | Did I say the Music Emporium? | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Aug 18 1986 10:21 | 20 |
| Let's hear it for old folkies! (I was president of the Folk Song
Society of Greater Boston about 10 years ago.)
First, second, and third choice for a music store are all the
Music Emporium, on Mass. Ave. Cambridge.
Note that for me, at least, a 12-string is easier on the fingers
than a 6-string (steel), since the individual string tension
is lower if you tune the guitar one tone (two frets) low (which
is a common technique on 12-strings) and the pressure on the
fingers is spread out more.
I think it's important to get a well-made 12-string, since a cheaper
one is more likely to pull apart. I don't know what prices are going
for these days, so I can't give you much advice there; mine is a
custom martin based on the D-12-28. I would GUESS that a Martin
D-12-20 would go used for between $600 and $800, and Guild probably
wouldn't be far behind. Check with the Music Emporium for other
makes.
|
7.29 | Don't fret about it... | JAWS::COTE | Cheese and Onions... | Mon Aug 18 1986 12:16 | 3 |
| Does anybody have the formula/algorythm for fret placement?
Edd
|
7.30 | Use a table | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Aug 18 1986 12:59 | 6 |
| If you want accurate placement, don't use a formula. Get a book
along the lines of "Guitar Repair" (I have a couple at home but
don't remember the titles) that contains tables. Once you've
got a table, you can apply a multiplicative factor to account
for the difference in bridge-to-nut length. If I remember, I'll
try to type in the table (if noone beats me to it).
|
7.2 | 12-string Yamaha | PARSEC::MELENDEZ | | Tue Aug 19 1986 10:25 | 10 |
| I am a 12-string guitar lover also. I have a Yamaha 12-string FG-260.
I got it about 10 years ago. I think it gives me a VERY nice sound.
I have played more expensive 12-strings (like Guild, Alvarez), but I
take my Yamaha any day.
For strings I used xtra-light. I find them much better on the fingers.
Some one told me xtra-light string do not give you volume, well that
brings me in to my second 12-string guitar which is a Fender Coronado
12 electric.
|
7.3 | Want AD | KRYPTN::JASNIEWSKI | | Tue Aug 19 1986 12:51 | 7 |
|
I've bought a couple of FG-260's for $50 ea. Look in the want
advertiser for *reasonably* priced 12 strings, mostly will be Yamaha's.
$700 for a guitar indeed!
Joe Jas
|
7.4 | I was going to say Yamaha | ERLANG::SUDAMA | | Tue Aug 19 1986 14:43 | 8 |
| I've only played a Yamaha 12-string once, but I thought it was pretty
good for the money. I'm sure if you were willing to pay through
the nose you could get something better, but I think the Yamaha
would be fine for a starter. I'd also recommend the Want-Advertiser
for used guitars.
Ram
|
7.5 | | PARVAX::PFAU | I brake for ferrets | Tue Aug 19 1986 18:17 | 16 |
| I have a Madeira 12 string which I bought for $150 (about 8 years ago).
Although I don't play it much anymore, I wouldn't give it up for the
world. (I wouldn't give up my bass, either, but for different
reasons.)
The best sound I ever got out of it was with silk strings. They seem
to improve the action a little but you still have to tune it down a bit
if you like to bend the strings.
I bought this guitar when I was in high school. I used to hang around
with a couple of freinds who also played guitar. Since we would play
just about anywhere and anytime, the guitar lived in my trunk for about
three years. Even after this less-than-optimum handling, the neck is
still straight and the tone is great.
tom_p
|
7.6 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Forever On Patrol | Wed Aug 20 1986 04:51 | 11 |
| I've had a Yamaha 12-string for about 12 years, and I like it
quite a bit. I haven't played it in many, many moons, though.
It needs some work on it (I get terrible buzz on the D and G
strings, especially the D) which I just never got around to
taking care of. I also haven't had enough time to devote to
playing my 6-string (Guild), and I wanted to do more with the
12 than just play it like a 6 with twice as many strings.
Make me a good offer, and I might consider selling it.
--- jerry
|
7.31 | Rule of Eighteen | 17686::MARSHALL | | Fri Aug 22 1986 09:40 | 14 |
| I'll beat you to it Paul.
According to Tom Wheeler's _The Guitar Book_, a luthier named Torres
developed the fingerboard system for classical guitars in the 19th
century. He based his system on a scale(string length) of 650mm
or about 25 5/7". I believe that the scale length on a Les Paul
is 24 3/4". Called the "Rule of Eighteen", the formula defines the
distance between the nut and the first fret as 1/18 of the ENTIRE
string length. THe distance between fret one and fret two is 1/18
of the REMAINING string length and so on up the neck. The precise
number used today is not (1/18), but (1/17.835).
rick (yes, XYLAR::MARSHALL)
|
7.7 | I Love My Guild | COMET2::LEVETT | it's a wonder I can think at all | Fri Aug 22 1986 18:41 | 32 |
| A few years back I traded a banjo for a Guild 12 string that was
in very good condition, paid $75.00 for it with the trade. It was
selling for $325.00. This was a used guitar (don't remember the
model) but has played like a champ ever since.
I've had a few friends that have had Yamaha 12 strings, they loved
the feel, the sound but almost invariably ended up with a warped
neck. Whether this was due to poor care on its owners part or the
guitar, I don't know. Yamaha HAS greatly improved their guitar
over the last 10 years and I find them extremely good buys for the
beginner (I just sold a Yamaha 6 string that I had).
The point that I was making with the Guild was if you look in good
pawn shops, or music stores you might be able to score a good used
instrument for a fairly good price. I was impressed that the Guild
has *always* been tuned to pitch with no problems using medium/light
strings. I played Gibsons that were terrible and Martins at twice
the price that couldn't compare with the 12 I bought. NOTE: This
is not saying the Martins weren't good guitars though the action
I felt needed setting, but comparitively for the value the Guild
was a much better buy.
Make sure you can get a guitar that your hand fits comfortably around
as 12 strings tend to have wide necks which cramp the hand which
will probably make you not want to play as much.
They do make beautiful sounds and there's alot that can be done
with them that you can't do with 6 strings.
Good luck in your search...
_stew-
|
7.8 | Martin/Guild comparison | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Fri Aug 22 1986 18:53 | 26 |
| If you played a Martin fresh from the factory, it likely had high
action; they tend to set them up that way under the assumption that
it's easier to lower the action to the customer's taste than raise
it. (My understanding, anyway.)
Martin and Guild 12-strings are very different guitars. Martins
generally have a more mellow, balanced sound, while Guilds are more
crisp (sometimes to the point of metallic). Guilds are also quite a
bit heavier (in weight, not sound). Which you prefer is wholly a
matter of taste (I'm obviously a Martin fanatic), though I've played
some really nice Guilds. I think Guilds hold their value somewhat
less well, which means they can be better bargains on the used
market.
Play several different guitars before making a decision, since they
do sound different. If you fall in love with a guitar you can't
afford, what the heck - this is America, get a second (third?)
mortgage!
I had a bad experience with a Yamaha six string in my youth, so I'm
somewhat leery of Japanese guitars, but that was 18 years ago, and
I'd find it very easy to believe that the quality has improved
greatly (I drive a Nissan) since then.
Alternative: look for an ancient Stella, tune it SIX frets down, and
play 12-string blues like Huddie Ledbetter! Great sound.
|
7.9 | Martin/Guild comparison...A reply | COMET2::LEVETT | it's a wonder I can think at all | Fri Aug 22 1986 19:09 | 14 |
| RE: -1
Paul, I agree with you 100%. I've always tended to stay away from
Martins like I do Nikon cameras, too much snobbery amoung the owners...
"Ah would NEVAH own anything other then a MAHTIN!" though it sounds
like you're pretty level headed. ;-)
Yes do go out and play a few, and again I agree with Paul, if it's
just out of your reach you're probably better off spending the extra
by taking out that 3rd mortgage...Ken Stewart does it all the time!!!
;-) ;-)
_stew-
|
7.10 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Forever On Patrol | Sat Aug 23 1986 05:13 | 7 |
| re:.7
I (and some friends of mine who know guitars far better than I do)
agree that while Martin makes a better guitar than Guild, the
latter is good enough to make it a better buy (ie. quality/price).
--- jerry
|
7.32 | Mind-numbing fractions | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Sat Aug 23 1986 13:14 | 30 |
| From "Complete Guitar Repair", Oak Publications" (of course,
the degree of accuracy listed here is a little excessive, given
that the degree of curvature of the frets will introduce more
uncertainty than the last couple of digits):
For a 24.5" scale:
Fret Fret Remaining
Interval Scale
1 1.37509 23.1249
2 1.29791 21.827
3 1.22507 20.6019
4 1.15631 19.4456
5 1.09141 18.3542
6 1.03015 17.3241
7 0.972333 16.3517
8 0.91776 15.434
9 0.86625 14.5677
10 0.81763 13.7501
11 0.77174 12.9783
12 0.728425 12.2499
13 0.687541 11.5624
14 0.648952 10.9134
15 0.612529 10.3009
16 0.57815 9.72275
17 0.545701 9.17705
18 0.515073 8.66198
19 0.486124 8.17581
20 0.458877 7.71694
|
7.33 | addendum | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Sat Aug 23 1986 13:19 | 2 |
| Also - I have one book that says the figure is 17.835 and another
that claims it's 17.817.
|
7.11 | Martin DOES set their action very high | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Sat Aug 23 1986 14:49 | 13 |
| > If you played a Martin fresh from the factory, it likely had high
> action; they tend to set them up that way under the assumption that
> it's easier to lower the action to the customer's taste than raise
> it. (My understanding, anyway.)
I don't know what the reasons are for it, but you are write in that
Martin deliberately sets their action very high. This is what exactly
what the Martin expert at Music Emporium in Boston said.
I own a Martin (D-35) but I wish I had a Guild also. They are both
excellent guitars.
db
|
7.12 | Martin does set their action high | DONNER::STEWART | | Sat Aug 23 1986 15:22 | 23 |
| Martin does set their actions high. The first D-18 I owned I was
a little frustrated with. It was constantly breaking the G string.
Then someone told me to file down the nut (where the string was
breaking). But the action itself was still high and I thought that
was strange for a guitar that was supposed to be so superior. I
was so frustrated that I ultimately traded the Martin for a Gibson
Hummingbird. It didn't take long to discover that this was a bigger
mistake. Though the action was good the neck was a lot thinner
and narrower (is there such a word?) than I was used to from the
Martin. The body had so much varnish that the sound couldn't get
out. So I got another D-18 and got rid of the Gibson. Still the
action was high. I was living in LA at the time and spent a lot
of time at McCabes guitar emporium in Santa Monica. They did work
for Doc Watson, Clarance White, Roland White, and others so I had
them do my guitar. I was shocked when they took a sureform (sp?)
to the bridge and started making sawdust out of it. But since the
guy looked like he knew what he was doing I calmed down. When he
was finished I was impressed that the work looked like it did before
he had started and the action was much improved. Most people that
have played my Martin have the same comment now, "It has the best
action of any Martin I've played." Thanks to the guys at McCabes.
=ken
|
7.13 | If you don't like the action, have it adjusted! | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Sun Aug 24 1986 16:13 | 9 |
| Action is not a permanent characteristic of a guitar. If you buy one
with action which is higher than you like, wait a couple of months
of playing (to be sure of what you want and in case the guitar
"takes a set"), then take it back for adjustment. In most cases,
taking the action down is merely a case of removing the nut (or
saddle, depending where the adjustment is needed) and filing it
thinner FROM THE BACK SIDE - never file the slots deeper! In some
cases it may be necessary to sand down the bridge itself. I've had
the action adjusted on most guitars I've owned (I like it low).
|
7.14 | Hoefner | GENRAL::FRASHER | | Thu Oct 02 1986 20:36 | 17 |
| I was pleased to see this note on 12-strings. I bought a Hoefner
in Germany for $400. I don't know what they go for in the states,
though. I got it around 1980 and its been just great. It comes
with a wrench to adjust the neck if you ever need to and 3 different
size bridges to raise or lower the strings. The neck is wide enough
to give me room for my fingers. Although the metal strings cause
blisters, if I'd stay with it long enough, I'd get used to it, like
any guitar. I've never tried another 12-string, but this one sounds
great.
I play (intermittently) mostly John Denver stuff. "Lady" sounds
really nice on a 12. I've been trying to learn "Dueling Banjoes"
by playing one part on the skinny strings and the other on the fat
ones. I usually wind up missing our old rock band from '69. Oh
well, time marches on.
Spence
|
7.15 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Forever On Patrol | Fri Oct 03 1986 09:40 | 11 |
| re:.14
If you're into John Denver stuff, try "The Eagle and the Hawk"
on a 12-string. *Really* nice.
Argh! on your method of playing "Dueling Banjos" on a 12. I used
to play with it on a six, picking the lower part over the hole
and the upper part right by the bridge to get two different
sounds. That was bad enough!
--- jerry
|
7.16 | HEY SCOTTY! | NWD002::MILLSSC | | Wed Oct 08 1986 18:07 | 5 |
| I HAVE A HAPPY AND ECONOMICAL SOLUTION FOR YA TAKAMINIE?HAS A WONDERFUL
12 STRING GUITAR WITH A NICE SOUNDING BUILT IN PICKUP I HAVE ONE
WITHOUT THE PICKUP BUT IAM DEFINETLY SWITCHING OVER!THERE $AROUND
300.00 THE VERSATILITY IS NICE .
SCOTT M/GOOD LUCK
|
7.17 | Guitar acquisition | WHAT::MORRILL | | Thu Nov 06 1986 11:08 | 7 |
| Hello Dave-
If you have already acquired a guitar, disregard this message.
Steve at Wurlitzer's could advise you well. (437-1822) or (754-5271)
Good Luck!
Linn
|
7.34 | fundamentals! | BASHER::CLARK | | Tue Nov 18 1986 17:11 | 15 |
| Back to first principals...(or is it principles?).....basics!!!!
The ratio of the frequencies of the notes 'E' to 'F', 'F' to 'F#',
'F#' to 'G', and so on, works out to be 169/180. Hence the length
of scale from each fret to the bridge, is 169/180 of the previous
fret distance. So starting with the nut to bridge length of say
26 inches, the first ('F') fret is 169/180 x 26 inches from the
bridge. The next ('F#') fret is 169/180(169/180 x 26) inches, and
so on, until the frets are thicker than the spaces!!!
All that is needed then, is a laser system to accurately mark
the fingerboard, and a computer driven spark erosion system to cut
the slots. The only problem there is that wood is not very conductive,
and does not readily lend itself to spark erosion!!
Hope this helps!!
Dave Clark...(one of many!)
|
7.18 | i've got a Sigma!? | ZEPPO::LAMBERT | inch by inch, row by row... | Tue Dec 23 1986 18:02 | 22 |
| well, i'm probably the worst mistreater of guitars ever to evolve on the
face of the earth. about 5 years ago i bought a used Sigma 12 with a
teency-weency barcus-berry pick up built into the bridge, with the plug
built into the rear strap peg - no volume controls, and it usually has to
be pre-amped for the pick up to pick up anything. paid $150.
never got a case, used to take it around to rehearsals and gigs in a
trash bag. at one point it fell out of my car onto the cement. it's
been battered and chipped and mistreated worse than a dirty dog!
it plays like a dream, gorgeous low action, the necks straight and true
sounds beautiful, has a narrow long neck, an adjustable bridge, oversized body,
it's ugly but indestructable! i always keep it strung with martin light or
extra lights.
the only problem i've got with it is the bridge, which is pulling up and
warping the body where it's connected. hasn't hurt the performance at all
though.
i love it like an old pair of worn in/out dungarees!
-max
|
7.19 | NUT SLOT FILING | KAOM01::PENNY | | Tue Feb 18 1986 12:24 | 21 |
| RE: 7.13
I beg to differ on the matter of filing the slots in the nut to
lower the action. I have worked on many guitars (repairs/renovations,
quite a few from people here at work), and I always file the slots
in the nut. Whether it's a simple action adjustment on an existing
nut, or replacing it with bone or ivory, the slot filing saves a
lot of work and potential damage to the nut "seat" area. (Some nuts
are installed with other than two drops of glue, which can lead
to chunks of wood coming off with the nut). As long as the focal
point of the nut (the side up against the fretboard) is not altered,
excellent results can be obtained. I always file from the focal
face down towards the machine heads. (Following the same angle/slant
as the head in relation to the neck). I use a rat-tail modellers
file (some call them jewellers files?).
(Isn't it amazing why most guitar manufacturers install *PLASTIC*
nuts and bridges! UUGGHH! Bone or ivory is the preferred material for
string resonance and maximum transmission of string vibration to
the soundboard). dep.
|
7.20 | | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Tue Feb 18 1986 19:40 | 12 |
| Granted, it can be done if you know what you're doing (and you're
right that caution must be used if a nut is being removed from the
neck for work), but for the novice, it's awfully easy to screw it
up, hence my warning. I've seen guitars on which the slots in the
nut were widened too much, resulting in buzzing. Because you're
trying to lower the action, there's no getting around deepening the
slot even at the fretside focal point; without just the right tools
it's very easy to make the slot too wide (not to mention getting it
deeper in front than in the middle). More people are likely to have
the simple fine file for working on the back.
So - all generalizations are false, and "be careful out there".
|
7.35 | Listen | BMT::COMAROW | | Sun May 03 1987 19:54 | 2 |
|
Frets-Jimmy D'Aquisto does it by ear.
|
7.36 | FITTING TREMELOS | PUGH::JON | | Wed Aug 19 1987 22:55 | 25 |
|
-< They don't em like they used to >-
I've a problem!
Im thinking about fitting a trembler arm system to a
1968 strat(Fender that is) not jap but yank pre CBS, O what a problem!
the problem is,
1: whats the best system yo use.
2: how do you align it.
3: this thing was made without one so does that mean chiseling out
a dirty great whole ?
Sorry for sounding ignorant on this subject, but i don't know
much about the mechanics of a guitar i just play it
yours inquizitivley CARRADOG
|
7.37 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Thu Aug 20 1987 15:10 | 31 |
| The easiest tremelo system to instyall is probablythe washburn
wonderbar..you just bolt it on no routing....I dunno how good they
are.
I installed a kahler in a lead 1 in about an hour...some routing
required...kahler gives you a routing template that you tape to
the guitar and you just go for it. Kahler is a good locking tremelo
system. One disadvantage, you have to shim the base of the neck
up about a 16th of an inch...the neck is now not making good contact
with the body and is more prone to movement and the tuning etc.
problems that come with that, I entered the best method I've found
of fixing that problem somewhere in this file. Even four bolt necks
(like my lead 1) will be more prone to movement after installing
a kahler.
Floyd Rose are also good bars. they require additional routing even
if your guitar was routd for a stock fender tremelo. I have nt ever
used one for very long, and have never really looked at the
installation.
Most of these can be installed for about $20 or so by good dealers
everywhere if you buy the bar from them. Pricwe depends on the amount
of routing they have to do.
The Floyd rose is probably the bar that looks the most like the
original fender tremelo, if that matters to you. Personally on a
guitar of that vintage I would skip it and get another guitar to
use with tremelo.
dave
|
7.38 | piop | CGVAX2::SZAFRANSKI | | Tue Jan 10 1989 15:07 | 33 |
|
keep it stock
notes
77sratch
exit
|
7.21 | Intune ... Intonation | REFINE::BLUMENSTOCK | | Thu Dec 07 1989 17:02 | 13 |
| I have a Yahmah ( yahma-who) FG-460, just got it in april.
I have not had much time to play with it due to the traveling
that I've been doing. Well I got to play with it alot ....
for the first time, and I noticed the intonation is severly
off at the 12 the fret on the low strings only. The problem
is most severe on the low E and A strings. Other than the action
there is no way to adjust the intonation. Now the action is high,
but it's still new, and I havn't had time to lower it. The lowering
of the action will change the intonation slightly but not enough to
correct the problem. Can anyobne help?
Rob
REFINE::BLUMENSTOCK
|
7.22 | There's hope | ZYDECO::MCABEE | les haricots | Thu Dec 07 1989 17:49 | 10 |
| re: -.1
You can make small adjustments to the intonation by making a new bridge saddle
that moves the point where the string breaks over the top. It's even feasible
to rout out the channel where the saddle sits to accomodate a thicker saddle.
This gives you more lattitude to move the break point. Of course on a
12-string, the intonation is never right unless you have a saddle that
compensates for individual strings.
Bob
|
7.23 | | ZYDECO::MCABEE | les haricots | Thu Dec 07 1989 18:03 | 5 |
| P.S. I'm assuming that the truss rod is properly adjusted. (?)
And is the neck straight and properly pitched?
Bob
|
7.24 | the windup ... and the pitch | REFINE::BLUMENSTOCK | | Fri Dec 08 1989 09:01 | 4 |
| I adjusted the truss rod myself, and it's perfect. I can't see
how changing the pitch would effect the only two or three of the
strings.
Rob
|
7.25 | | ZYDECO::MCABEE | les haricots | Tue Dec 12 1989 12:02 | 10 |
|
> I can't see
> how changing the pitch would effect the only two or three of the
> strings.
Well, it shouldn't. I just meant that you shouldn't consider the suggestion
in .22 without first verifying the integrity of the neck.
Bob
|
7.26 | gopher it | OTOO01::ELLACOTT | Freddie's Revenge | Fri Dec 15 1989 15:13 | 4 |
| In my experience lowering the bridge can help a lot, it fixed both
my Fender 6 & myepiphone 12....you go nothing to lose (except a
couple of bucks for a new bridge sadle) and you may get intune
everywhere
|
7.27 | caveat gopher | ZYDECO::MCABEE | les haricots | Mon Dec 18 1989 14:22 | 18 |
|
> In my experience lowering the bridge can help a lot, it fixed both
> my Fender 6 & myepiphone 12....you go nothing to lose (except a
> couple of bucks for a new bridge sadle) and you may get intune
> everywhere
Well...you might lose a little more than that. Lowering the bridge action too
much can result in a significant loss of volume and clarity. But my
experience has been that most people don't notice this, probably for two
reasons.
- They don't get to compare "before" and "after" side-by-side, and
- They're too much absorbed in how good the lower action feels to notice
a small change in the sound.
Bob
|
7.28 | | ZYDECO::MCABEE | les haricots | Mon Dec 18 1989 14:26 | 4 |
| I guess I should say, "...a *small*, but significant loss of volume ...".
Bob
|
7.39 | pay to have it done for you | FREEBE::LOUVAT | | Thu Apr 11 1991 10:18 | 8 |
| Jon,
I'd say keep it stock!!!!!!!But if your bound and determined to put one
on, there are many that are pretty good. I just has a Gotoh tremelo
system put on mine. I had it done because if anything was wrong with it
then that person owned the problem, not me and he'd be responsible to
make it right. However, I wasn't having one put on a vintage piece of
equipment....
|
7.40 | | GOES11::G_HOUSE | Stereotype, monotype, blood type... | Thu Apr 11 1991 13:09 | 6 |
| re: .-1
Given that Jon wrote that note back in 1987, I rather imagine his
decision's already been made. :-)
Greg
|