T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5271.1 | | TENAYA::MWM | | Fri Dec 13 1991 14:04 | 16 |
| I assume you're talking about the Unix "Practical Extraction and Report
Language".
Yes, there's a version for the Amiga. It's on fish disk #161. It's a rather
old version, and has some important features missing because they
relied heavily on Unix facilities.
If you want to write Amiga-specific scripts, Rexx makes an adequate
substitue - I've wished for Rexx on my DECStation about as often as
I've wished for PERL on my Amiga.
If you want to write things that will be portable between the two, you
may be out of look. I use Scheme, but I that may not be an acceptable
alternative to you.
<mike
|
5271.2 | What's Rexx? | DREUL1::rob | Rob Marshall - Customer Service Dresden | Mon Dec 16 1991 02:39 | 19 |
| Hi Mike,
Thanks for the info. I had also seen something (I think it was in comp.lang.
perl) about someone porting 4.19 to the Amiga, so who knows...
One question I do have, though, is: what is Rexx? I keep seeing references to
Rexx and ARexx, but, being that I don't (yet? :-) have an Amiga, I don't know
what they are. Do they come with the Amiga? and are they similar to a shell
in U*IX? (I've done a lot of shell [ksh] programming and now I'm learning PERL).
I guess that having PERL itself isn't as much the issue as being able to write
scripts that allow me to use system facilities (and other utilities) fairly
easy, ie in U*IX style. Like being able to use pipes, command substitution,
or equivalents would be nice. Although the strings capabilites (regexp's) in
PERL are *very* nice.
Thanks,
Rob
|
5271.3 | 5006.* | WHAMMY::268 | For three strange days... | Mon Dec 16 1991 12:15 | 8 |
| Check out note 5006.*, entitled "History & Description of Arexx, please".
Mike wrote a very good description in note 2.
The standard Amiga shell has pretty adequate scripting facilities, but
there are several U*x type shells available with much more functionality.
Not having used ARexx I can't compare it with the shells.
Steve
|
5271.4 | re: previous 2 | KALI::PLOUFF | Owns that third brand computer | Mon Dec 16 1991 13:01 | 3 |
| Boys, boys! It's *OK* to say "Unix" these days. ;-)
Wes
|
5271.5 | | TENAYA::MWM | | Mon Dec 16 1991 13:20 | 6 |
| The following two comments point out something quite pertinent - if you
want a Unix-like shell, you can get it. Either csh-like or ksh-like.
You can also get WShell (a commercial producct from the author of Rexx)
that provides those - and more - in a very AmigaDOS compatable manner.
<mike
|