| Hi,
I've read that the flicker fixer reduces the picture size..... Is this still
the case (especially for the Microway FF)? Also, does anybody use a Taxan
Multisync and know the pinouts for a lead?
Re .0; I was talking about whether the FF is still needed with the ECS. But I
believe that it is...
Dave.
|
| Re: a few back
There have been some rumors to the effect that the ECS upgrade will be
made available at the same time the Workbench 2.0 upgrade is made
available. I suspect that is what is causing the confusion.
Re: .0
Yes, a flicker fixer card is still valuable even with the Enhanced
Chip Set. In fact, the 3000 comes with both the ECS and the
equivalent of the flicker fixer on the motherboard.
The ECS adds several new graphics modes to the Amiga, but it also
supports all of the existing graphics modes. Not surprisingly, the
existing graphics modes that flicker also flicker under ECS.
The ECS also adds some new "productivity" modes, which are non-interlaced,
non-flickering 400+ scan line modes. However, these new modes have two
disadvantages:
1. They cause a lot of cycle-stealing. Amiga's without fast
RAM will really slow down. Even Amiga with fast RAM will
have graphics operations slow down.
2. They are limited to a maximum of four colors and they a limited
palette of colors to choose from (512? instead of 4096).
What this means is that if you get a flicker fixer, and use the interlaced
modes instead of the productivity modes, you will get the same resolution
and lack of flicker, but you also get more colors and a faster machine.
With either a flicker fixer or the new productivity modes, you need
a multisync monitor. The old 1080 and 1084 monitors can't handle the
faster scan rates.
I've been very happy with my MicroWay FlickerFixer, but I'd recommend
getting one of the new Commodore flicker fixer boards, since it has a
few features that that the MicroWay board lacks. See previous notes
about the differences between the two boards.
|