T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4473.1 | check out title="RD" | POLAR::RIDGE | | Wed Jan 30 1991 15:59 | 1 |
| do a dir/title="rd" Your answer should be in there.
|
4473.2 | I've tried dir/title=....... | DUCK::NONDEP | | Thu Jan 31 1991 06:10 | 9 |
| I've done a dir=title=rd, drive, st, hard drive and one or two other
but there is nothing about rd51 nor st 412 run through all notes and
reply, slow and tedious but only way i know to find some answers.
This is why i posted .0. I repeat that i'm not technical at all !
Many thanks Patrick
|
4473.3 | | WJG::GUINEAU | the number 42 comes to mind | Thu Jan 31 1991 08:23 | 33 |
| > question 1 What do i need from there to connect it to my AMIGA 500 !
The RD51 is an ST-506 interface drive. The only controller on Amiga I know
of that supports ST-506 directly is the A2090(a), but it is a Amiga 2000
expansison card. So here are at least 3 options:
1. Buy one of the A500 expansion boxes that give you A2000 slots
(like the Pacific Peripherals thing, or the Bodega Bay (sp?))
Find an A2090(a) (don't think CBM makes them anymore)
Then you would need the cables and power a supply.
2. Buy any of the many SCSI cardas for the A500 and buy an Adaptec
or OMTI SCSI to ST-506 adapter.
You still need power supply and cables.
3. Talk to John Bernard. He has built all kinds of disk expansions
and can probably help you out.
> QUESTION 2 what is the size of the "disk" ?
RD51 is 10MB.
> question 3 Can i have some ram fitted somewhere ?
Most of the A500 SCSI adapters allow you to plug in RAM. There
are also many RAM expansion boards available for the A500.
john
|
4473.4 | More questions ! | DUCK::NONDEP | | Thu Jan 31 1991 12:26 | 17 |
| John,
Thanks for the first input.
Is it then only a 10MB or a 100MB as if it is 10 then not worth
investing in perepherials... I'll rather try to find a larger disk.
RD53 or 54 i think.
The RD51 is an ST-506 interface drive you said is this the top bit of my
unit or the bottom bit just that i'm confused i always though that an
interface was a board or something like that and here I have a board
plus a something else that i though was a disk.
Why does it says Model st412 ?
Cheers Patrick
|
4473.5 | It's a TENner! | GOBAMA::WILSONTL | Lead Trumpet (Read that...LEED!) | Thu Jan 31 1991 15:01 | 5 |
| RD51 is a TEN (not hundred) Megabyte drive. Unless you just want to
play with it, IMHO it is not worth the time and certainly not the money
if you don't already have the facility in place to simply plug it in.
Tony
|
4473.6 | | WJG::GUINEAU | the number 42 comes to mind | Thu Jan 31 1991 16:51 | 11 |
|
It's Seagate's model st412. We (DEC) bought them from Seagate and called them
the RD51.
Seagate invented the ST506 interface standard. It was originally called the
st412 due in part I think to the model name of the drives.
RD50 was the first (5mb) product with this interface, RD51,52,53,54 followed.
Now we do RZxx (SCSI) products (RZ22,23,24,55,56,57 so far)
john
|
4473.7 | More and more questions | DUCK::HUNTS | | Fri Feb 01 1991 06:33 | 20 |
|
Well, well
I will not use the RD51 as only 10MB
Reading .6 John's comments. I have now an other series of questions.
Is ST or SCSI standard very different.
I'm basically looking at a 100MB drive or more. I would like to choose
any one from DEC RD or RZ.
Is One standard more trouble free once installed on an Amiga 500 ?
Are parts more available for one then the other ?
Can they both autoboot ? or is this depending on the "interfaces" or
software you use.
That's all for now, Patrick
|
4473.8 | | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Fri Feb 01 1991 07:38 | 16 |
| re: .7
The ST506 and SCSI interface standards are quite different. ST506
operates at a lower level than SCSI, so it would be possible to build
an adapter which presented a SCSI interface to the computer and an
ST506 interface to the drive. The reverse adapter would be much more
difficult, or perhaps impossible.
I have an A2090 on my Amiga. When I got it I also bought a 40 MB
ST506 drive with it. I've had very little trouble with it since late
1987. The A2090 also has a SCSI port, and I recently invested in a
100 MB SCSI drive. It works fine, too.
Autoboot is a function of the controller, not of the drive or its
interface. The A2090A sutoboots, the A2090 doesn't.
John Sauter
|
4473.9 | | WJG::GUINEAU | the number 42 comes to mind | Fri Feb 01 1991 07:58 | 8 |
|
All A500 interface cards are SCSI.
SCSI is typically much higher performance thatn ST-506
If you can get a SCSI drive, get it.
john
|
4473.10 | | ULTRA::KINDEL | Bill Kindel @ LTN1 | Fri Feb 01 1991 09:48 | 14 |
| Re .9:
> All A500 interface cards are SCSI.
Actually, the A590 comes with a built-in AT drive and provides both
interfaces. Both the AT and SCSI connectors are present, and a jumper
controls which one is active. The external connector is for additional
SCSI drives.
> SCSI is typically much higher performance thatn ST-506
>
> If you can get a SCSI drive, get it.
I agree. Even an AT drive is a VAST improvement over diskettes, though.
|
4473.11 | | BAHTAT::FORCE4::hilton | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Fri Feb 01 1991 10:27 | 10 |
| If you've just got an RD and chuffed about that, then which controller
do people recommend?
I'm toying with CHEAPHD and saw super_cheaphd.lzh on tape::.
Anyone have any good/bad comments about these?
Cheers,
Greg
|
4473.12 | bus to light | NOTIBM::MCGHIE | Thank Heaven for small Murphys ! | Thu Feb 07 1991 17:16 | 7 |
| re .10,
I think the jumper doesn't actually determine which one is active, but
rather which bus the hard disk activity light on the front of the 590
is used to represent.
Mike
|
4473.13 | | ULTRA::KINDEL | Bill Kindel @ LTN1 | Fri Feb 08 1991 09:15 | 11 |
| Re .12:
> I think the jumper doesn't actually determine which one is active, but
> rather which bus the hard disk activity light on the front of the 590
> is used to represent.
You may be right. Since the A590 has an internal SCSI drive connector
in addition to the AT drive connector, it could be that both are usable
(if you could figure out how to cram two drives into the limited space
available 8^). Perhaps the controller logic gives one priority at boot
time so a formal jumper isn't needed.
|
4473.14 | Under Software Control | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Fri Feb 08 1991 17:02 | 10 |
| Re: .13
I believe the rigid disk blocks contain boot priorities for all partitions
on a disk and that the controller looks at the rigid disk blocks for all
the drives connected to it before booting. If I'm right, you should be
able to boot off any hard drive you want.
For the Commodore disk controllers, I believe the boot priority is hidden
under the advanced setup options for a partition in HDtoolbox (or whatever
the disk setup program is called).
|