|
I went to the Marlboro MA Pee Cee show on Saturday, October 6. This
show comes around a few times a year and vendors from all over the east
coast hawk their wares at very reasonable prices.
Most of the booths had 386 clones running some very simple animations
that were reminiscent of what was being done on the Amiga in 1985 with
Aegis Animator. (I believe the animations were done with AutoCAD
Animator, which was partially written by Jim Kent of Amiga reknown).
The showgoers all seemed very impressed with these simple cartoon-like
demos. There was a fairly good one of a ray traced chess board with
pieces being stamped out with a robot arm. Not quite up to Amiga
standards, but close.
There was a very interesting slide show running in 1024 x 768 Super VGA
(256 color) mode at one booth. The images (of bathing suit beauties)
looked like photographs. The downside is that these enormous images
(.77 MB each) just cannot be loaded in quickly from hard disk to
perform any animation at any meaningful frame rate. The PC/AT 8 MHz
bus must also be a bottleneck.
I think the PC world is finally getting excited about graphics,
animation and sound. Too bad they still don't know what an Amiga is!
Ed
|
| re:.1
Did you see the raytraced sliver balls going around in a circle? There
were lots of nice demos, and really great prices. That catch was that
price of systems doing the demos was not cheap.
I hope CBM or somebody will come out with a 1024x768 amiga graphics
card sometime soon, those monitors looked great and the price is
dropping fast.
Dave
|
|
Re: cheap monitors...
I was actually entertaining the thought of picking up a 14" monitor (I
currently use a 12" Princeton that is very sharp, but smallish), but
most of the off brands being bundled with the 386 systems did not impress
me, despite the .28 mm dot pitch and 1024 dot resolution.
The cheap SVGA monitors ($450) seemed to have displays that made scanned
images look good, but text looked weak. Also, the display actually
jittered on many of them. By comparison, the Sony and NEC displays
looked much better; rock solid with more vivid color. Also about $200
more.
I kept my money.
Ed.
|