T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3998.1 | Which ones are converted.... | CGOFS::CADAMS | Clint Adams - Calgary, Canada | Wed Aug 08 1990 16:26 | 9 |
|
Do you have any examples of a 256 color GIF converted to IFF using this
method. How does it compare with GIF2IFF. As well, have you tried using
Digi-View to convert an RGB format to Dyna-Hires (I think this can be
done). I'll bet some of those 256 color GIF pics would look great in
Dyna-Hires.
Regards.... Clint
|
3998.2 | | WJG::GUINEAU | | Wed Aug 08 1990 16:41 | 13 |
| > Digi-View to convert an RGB format to Dyna-Hires (I think this can be
> done). I'll bet some of those 256 color GIF pics would look great in
> Dyna-Hires.
> Regards.... Clint
I haven't uploaded them yet, but I tried some in HAM, HAM+ and Dyna modes
on DigiView 4.0 - NICE!
this is THE utility for gif -> iff conversion (IF you have DigiView 4.0...)
john
|
3998.3 | | STAR::ROBINSON | | Wed Aug 08 1990 17:11 | 6 |
| >>(IF you have DigiView 4.0...)
Are you using the Transfer24 program? If so, then DigiPaint 3.0 users might
qualify.
Dave
|
3998.4 | | WJG::GUINEAU | | Wed Aug 08 1990 17:27 | 6 |
|
>Are you using the Transfer24 program? If so, then DigiPaint 3.0 users might
No, strait DigiView loading of the 24 bitplane images.
john
|
3998.5 | The ART Department | SALEM::LEIMBERGER | | Fri Aug 10 1990 05:58 | 3 |
| The ART Department should also be able to handle these pics. If
it can I expect better results than Transfer 24.
bill
|
3998.6 | very nice for sure | SALEM::LEIMBERGER | | Mon Aug 13 1990 06:20 | 22 |
| I tried several pics with GiftoRGB -> TAD(the art department) and
the results were very good. I did a grayscale pic,and several colored
pics. In both instances my initial load into TAD left something
to be desired. Not because the pic was bad but because the images
were large,so it gave a grainy effect on the grayscale,and the dithered
colors could be seen on the color pic. Once I scaled them down they
looked great. I also took the grayscale,and converted it to lineart.
It was a pic of a woman,and the result looked very much like a
charcoal pic,very unusual. The color pic had fleshtones that were
made up largely of green and yellow. Once scaled down they looked
close to fleshtones. The last pic I did was an Escher. It came out
very well. I feel the acid test for a conversion program is
fleshtone. Of course I haven't seen the pics on an I** so I cannot
say how close the conversion is. However my gut reaction would be
to say thay are very close. What I have seen in the clone world
holds true to the heavy use of green,and yellow for pics with
fleshtones.BTW if you convert a colored pic to grayscale the
results are excellent. I think this converter is just great!
bill
PS. I haven't printed the docs yet so I suppose I can do better.
If there is a shareware attached, the author certainly earned his
money.
|
3998.7 | GIF to DYNA/HAM converter | CGOFS::DREW | Steve Drew | Tue Aug 14 1990 01:04 | 75 |
|
Well, to make a long story short... for the best GIF to IFF
conversion currently possible, you do not need DIGI-VIEW 4.0
or GIFtoRGB.
I have tried every GIFtoIFF viewer/converter available
(GifMAch,SHAM,HAMGIF and so on...) incluing GIFtoRGB ->
Digi-view 4.0 and I have'nt found one that will do a better
job than the GIF2IFF converter that I wrote a while back (see
other notes.), although some produce real close results.
DIGI-VIEWs dyna res mode is the only exception...
* So I enhanced my GIF2IFF program to optionally produce
DYNA RES output. Viewable with DYNA-SHOW.
My GIF2IFF converter produces the exact results (so close
you'd have to page flip to see if any pixels are different)
as using GIFtoRGB -> DIGI VIEW 4.0 -> DYNA RES output. My
GIF2IFF or the DIGIVIEW process is not a fast one, the
GIFtoRGB to DIGIVIEW dynares takes about 20 minutes which is
not far off what my converter takes and it requires no manual
intervention. [By the way on a DECstation 3100, my converter
takes about 20-30 seconds per picture.] On a stock A2000 it
runs about 15 minutes for a single pass to over 30 minutes for
multi pass dyna res large picture (640 by 480).
As stated in the GIF2RGB doc file DIGI VIEW also screws up
the contrast and brightness of the picture you have to set
the brightness to -25 and contrast to -26 to look like the
original. (I did do this in my testing). The nice thing
about digiview though is the ability to adjust these values
as in some cases more contrast actually looks better. (I may
add a contrast adjustment into my converter if this is worth
while).
DYNA RES mode is also over-rated... those dyna res pictures
that come with the PD demos are carefully chosen to have the
colors chaning from top to bottom and not left to right to
get the most out of the new color map per scan line.
Dyna RES mode does clean up the picture a little. But for
the hassel of DYNA-RES I'm not sure if it's worth the effort.
But it was not a major effort to add this functionality to my
existing program, and its interesting to play with.
DYAN RES is'nt that much better than plain HAM because most
digitized pictures have almost has many colors across one
scan line as they do across the entire picture, so generating
a new color map (16 color regs) per scan line only varies a
little from the intial or previous color map. Espescially for
flesh tones.
The other reason that IFF HAM pictures don't look as good as
the digitized GIF orignals is because GIF uses a palette of
20 million colors (256 present at one time) and HAM IFF uses
a palette of 4096 colors (average of >256 and <500 colors
present) which does'nt seem goodenough for small changes in
color like flesh tones.
I will post my updated GIF2IFF converter after I finish
adjusting the code for best results. (Not a quick process).
Interesting though, after recompiling my original converter
code with MANX 5.0 it now runs twice as fast as compiled with
MANX 3.6a... anyway, I just happen to be working on this
when this topic was started so I thought I'd put in my two
cents worth....
If I get a change I'll upload some example pictures, or if
anyone has some real good GIFs to convert I'd be happy to
process them and post the results.
/Steve/
|
3998.8 | How about adding RGB to GIF2IFF? | CSSE32::SMITH | Reality, just a visible imagination? | Tue Aug 14 1990 15:01 | 7 |
| Hi Steve,
How about adding 24 bit RGB output support as well. This would allow
expermentation with the image for Digi-View owners.
...Ed
|
3998.9 | | CGOFS::DREW | Steve Drew | Tue Aug 14 1990 15:09 | 13 |
|
>How about adding 24 bit RGB output support as well. This would allow
>expermentation with the image for Digi-View owners.
Just use GIFtoRGB already mentioned in this note, thats what I was
using when experimenting with DIGI-VIEW.
The output from GIF2IFF is already DIGI-VIEW compatable cause its IFF
or DYNA RES.
/Steve/
|