[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hydra::amiga_v1

Title:AMIGA NOTES
Notice:Join us in the *NEW* conference - HYDRA::AMIGA_V2
Moderator:HYDRA::MOORE
Created:Sat Apr 26 1986
Last Modified:Wed Feb 05 1992
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5378
Total number of notes:38326

3888.0. "Viruses from Amiga to VAX? Panic mode?" by CURRNT::POWELL (I admit it - I LIKE Vogon poetry!!) Sat Jun 30 1990 22:32

    Having asked for and been given a modem by my Manager, I am now
    happily able to work from home on the odd occasion.
    
    On the other hand, one of the rooms in my home is already devoted
    to computers and the thought of bringing a terminal home just for
    work use didn't at first seem very logical. It's true that by using
    my Amiga the only thing I appear unable to do is get a 132-column
    screen, but otherwise I get the best of all worlds (and with script
    files I don't even have to worry about the lengthy logging-in process).
    
    However, the other day my manager pointed something out to me that
    I hadn't considered and I would be grateful for any advise or opinions.
    
    Should I worry about introducing a virus onto the VAX and if so
    how, apart from normal precautions, do I avoid any possibility of
    this? I understand that Amiga viruses cannot be transmitted to VMS,
    but do I understand correctly? In short, do I ask for a VT terminal?
    
    David Powell.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3888.1Don't sweat it!POBOX::ANDREWSI'm the NRASun Jul 01 1990 06:593
    Nope, won't happen. No way, no how.
    
    The two machines are not any way compatable as far as software goes.
3888.2LEDS::ACCIARDILarger than life, and twice as uglySun Jul 01 1990 08:5710
    
      >						    It's true that by using
      > my Amiga the only thing I appear unable to do is get a 132-column
      > screen,
    
    If you use Handshake, you can get a very readable 132 column display on
    your Amiga.  Handshake is  a shareware VT220 emulator that is available
    on the net here.
    
    Ed.
3888.3common sense is all thats neededSALEM::LEIMBERGERMon Jul 02 1990 06:1910
    I too don't feel there is any danger. We are at a point where dec
    has elected to sell,and network the I** clones. If a danger exsisted
    this would be a very big problem. It is possible someone could upload
    some sort of virus,but it would have to be written for the Vax,and
    then entered into the system. Of course this could happen on the
    inside without any other system involved. that is why we have
    protection in the form of passwords etc. The only real danger would
    be in someone letting others acsess their accounts.Of course this
    would be a problem even if they were using a VT.
    								bill
3888.4132 columnsNAVIER::MELLITZMon Jul 02 1990 08:389
>  >						    It's true that by using
>  > my Amiga the only thing I appear unable to do is get a 132-column
>  > screen,
    
    I use VLTjr in 132 column mode all the time.  I like the multi color
    support for rev/bold test too.
   
    ...Rich

3888.5Safe Computing -> No ProblemULTRA::KINDELBill Kindel @ BXB1Mon Jul 02 1990 10:2525
    Re .0:
    
    I'm not going to enter a lengthy dissertation on the differences among
    "viruses", "worms", "Trojan Horses", et al.  Instead, I'll recommend
    "safe computing" as the way to avoid all of the above.
    
    We in the computer security business talk about "integrity" as the
    property whereby a system, user, or object (program/file/volume ...) is
    free of all such infection.  That is, an object is/does precisely what
    it claims to be/do.
    
    A system that has been initialized using distribution media is
    considered to have "high" integrity.  The libraries on your local
    bulletin board must be assumed to have very "low" integrity.  Your
    system CAN become a carrier (even if not itself infected) if you
    transfer executable files through it from that come from questionable
    sources.
    
    It is up to you to ASSURE the integrity of whatever you transfer to
    your systems at home and at work.  The easiest way is to KNOW YOUR
    SOURCES.  Conversely, know when you're exposing yourself to a risk.  If
    you get something from a questionable source, ASSUME IT IS INFECTED
    until you've proven otherwise.  Keep it in isolation while you check it
    out and DON'T PASS IT ON UNTIL YOU'RE CERTAIN that it's safe.
            
3888.6Theoretical or practical concern?BOLTON::PLOUFFIt came from the... dessert!Mon Jul 02 1990 16:1927
    re: .5
    
    Huh?  The original note asked if an Amiga could introduce a virus to a
    VMS system.  I would assume that this is impossible unless one were to
    upload a VMS executable or a .COM file.  The first case seems to me
    quite unlikely for a personal computer user to want to do.  In the
    second case, it's only prudent to either  a) have confidence in the
    source of the material, or b) understand the contents.
    
    As for Bill's comment,
    > ...The libraries on your local
    > bulletin board must be assumed to have very "low" integrity.
    
    From a theoretical point of view this may be true, but the lack of
    Amiga noters reporting this problem leads me to believe that there are
    many "clean" public sources of software.  By "clean" I mean that a
    particular BBS is highly unlikely to carry infected software, so that
    for all practical purposes an Amiga owner need not worry.  Certainly
    the worst problem seen with stuff available on the Easynet is that a
    few programs won't work on some hardware configurations.
    
    But I can speculate all day.  Do more avid BBSers than myself run into
    contaminated software very often?  Do you know of BBS operators who are
    lax about 'vetting' new uploads?  (You get extra credit for first hand
    experience and naming names of problem software and BBSes.)
    
    Wes
3888.7BAGELS::BRANNONDave BrannonMon Jul 02 1990 20:517
    I suspect it's a case of "why bother".  Somebody intent of trying to
    infect a VMS system would be a lot more likely to spend time doing
    it for an ibmpc instead of an amiga.  And even more likely, would 
    develop/test/release it from a VMS system.  Are there BBSes with
    VMS software?
    
                 Dave
3888.8A virus has to run to work.VCSESU::MOORETom Moore MRO1-3/SL1 297-5224Wed Jul 04 1990 03:0417
    I agree that the risk is low but it is important that users understand
    where the risk is. For a virus to work it must be executed. This also
    includes command procedures or raw data that may direct an application
    to do something you don't want it to.  As long as you are just copying
    data and not using it the risk is very low but  probably not zero as
    these guys are clever. 

    A mechanism that would cause a problem is to receive a utility that
    compliments one on you use on your AMIGA. If you copy it up and use it
    there could be a virus in it. If you have minimal privileges there is
    much less risk as VMS systems have security features that protect the
    system and other unprivileged user. 

    Just remember that don't use anything that you're not sure of unless
    you are ready for the results.

	
3888.9Looks like the answer is a guarded "no", then?CURRNT::POWELLI admit it - I LIKE Vogon poetry!!Wed Jul 04 1990 14:1417
    I was being purposefully vague about "viruses" in my original note
    in order to see what responses I'd get and Bill in .5 was quite
    right to note that there are many types of (for want of a better
    generic term) "infestation".
    
    The purpose of the note was to determine whether anyone was aware
    of the possibility of *direct* infestation from an Amiga to a VAX.
    
    From the replies I think I can take it - for the moment - that the
    answer is no.
    
    As for running unknown software on a VAX, I am fully aware of the
    possible implications. 
    
    Thanks to all for your thoughts and advice.
    
    David.