T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3547.1 | Hummmm! | NSSG::SULLIVAN | Steven E. Sullivan | Tue Mar 06 1990 15:26 | 16 |
| RE:3547.0
George,
> -< Imtronics ProRam 1.8 (for the A500) >-
I was speaking with Dave Haynie (OK, so I'm name dropping...;')
and this topic came up. He mentioned that a modification of the Gary
logic would be necessary to make the memory decode to the right
addresses. He mentioned that the implementation he had seen (no names
mentioned, sorry) used a "Gary Tower" to implement the extra logic.
I got the impression that he felt such hacks were not real hot.
Thanks,
-SES
|
3547.2 | Autoconfig or bust.., | FROCKY::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Wed Mar 07 1990 04:43 | 15 |
|
Re: .0, .1
Yup, Steven is right here.
To have more than 512K in the A501 space AND to have them
autoconfiguring, you'll need your soldering iron or to insert
intermediate sockets with the neccesary wiring.
And you don't want any non-autoconfig memory in your system when
that nice autoconfiguring HD-controller (or whatever) on your expansion
slot decodes it's memory space where your RAM is, since it has no
idea of it's presence...
Regards,
<CB>
|
3547.3 | Insider board or bust now | NITMOI::WITHERS | Another Hallmark Moment. -Al Bundy | Wed Mar 07 1990 11:43 | 5 |
| Thats what I was afraid of...looks like the insider board for memory.
Thanks for info,
George
|
3547.4 | | NSSG::SULLIVAN | Steven E. Sullivan | Thu Mar 08 1990 14:51 | 16 |
|
RE: .-1
> To have more than 512K in the A501 space AND to have them
> autoconfiguring, you'll need your soldering iron or to insert
> intermediate sockets with the neccesary wiring.
Remember, the Amiga OS does not Autoconfig (tm) C000000 memory, it just
notices it is there. Thus, no Autoconfig (tm) logic is needed to have
this memory automatically recognized by the system and neither is addemem
or other hack.
My understanding of what Dave was talking about had to do with the decoding
of the address lines that connect the A501/clone to the motherboard by Gary.
-SES
|
3547.5 | For 1.8 MB??? | FROCKY::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Fri Mar 09 1990 04:24 | 9 |
| Re: .4
Quite correct, however I believe (have to check the manuals on the
weekend) that this is only guaranteed (sp?) to work with 512KB and
not with 1.8MB (mirrored areas and such stuff).
Regards,
<CB>
|
3547.6 | | NSSG::SULLIVAN | Steven E. Sullivan | Fri Mar 09 1990 10:25 | 10 |
| RE:.7
> weekend) that this is only guaranteed (sp?) to work with 512KB and
> not with 1.8MB (mirrored areas and such stuff).
Ah sooo! The memory map does show 2 meg there, but I am not sure
about the implementation particulars... very good point.
-SES
|