T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3541.1 | Is WHAMMY your Amiga nodename? | ENOVAX::BARRETT | Of Optical Mice and Men... | Fri Mar 02 1990 13:50 | 2 |
| Can you also give a configuration breakdown and cost (even if it's
estimated)?
|
3541.2 | config information | WHAMMY::SPODARYK | Binary Throttle | Fri Mar 02 1990 16:27 | 40 |
| Well, I can't say what the DECnet software might cost since I am a beta
tester (and I really have no idea). I didn't sign a non-disclosure, but
I morally feel that I can't give too much away about the product, since
things will change before it's released. I'll ask Syndesis what I'm entitled
to say. They may actually want to spread the word, who knows?
X-Windows is currently available in a monochrome version, so I can give out
some relevant information, not directly related to this beta version. I
really don't know what the cost is, but I believe I have seen it advertised
(with the optical mouse) close to $400. Minus the mouse - $300. That might
be on the high side.
X will run on any Amiga system with at least 1M of memory. This is strictly
as an X-terminal, no local clients.
It will run very comfortably on a 2M system, and at least this much RAM is
recommended. You will need 6M of hard disk space to install the full
set of Server, Clients, Fonts, Bitmaps, and support programs. This may be
local or on a remote harddisk, accessed via NFS (TCP/IP - not DECnet).
Floppies are ok, but you might have to do some swapping - like you normally
would expect.
A 1M Amiga 500, would actually make a decent X-terminal provided you could
get a high speed serial connection, or make use of an ethernet card through
an expansion box.
I was running X this afternoon, and it's fairly usable at 2400 baud. It's
obviously not super responsive, but not terrible. I would bet that 9600
would be nice, and 19.2 pretty darn good. At 2400 I would have to call it
SLUGwindows.
It's kind of neat to use notes/mail/Xemacs/... on your Amiga, while actually
running local clients. Let's see a PC/Mac do that! You can also run multiple
servers, each with it's own screen. That's something else very unique.
A killer setup would have to consist of one of those 19" 1Kx1K resolution
monitors (or ECS), A2500, ethernet board, and proper software == A reasonably
priced X based workstation.
Steve
|
3541.3 | | NAVIER::LONG | | Mon Mar 05 1990 09:49 | 9 |
| re:-1
You forgot to add a thinwire connection to your home office!!!
Anybody ever hear what became of the proposal to rent bandwidth
from a local cable company so that E-net connections could be
made from home in the Stow area? Talked about heavily a few years
ago then dropped like a rock.
Dick
|
3541.4 | A few .iff pics | WHAMMY::SPODARYK | Binary Throttle | Thu Mar 08 1990 14:11 | 23 |
| I have 'screensave'd a few X11 screens and placed them in an archive on
tape::user2:[upload]x11_pics.zoo. There is a short .readme there also.
They just show a few DECwindows clients running from a VMS host, as well
as a few local clients. The 'save' utility produces an .iff that
Superview doesn't particularly like. It ends up not being properly
centered. Try the older 'ViewILBM' (or paint program) to show these
pics. (I can set the screen colors, but have left them black/white. They
may flicker slightly.)
The X11 is working out pretty well. Since TSSnet is an announced product
from Syndesis, I have gotten the go ahead to talk about, demo it, etc.
I'm currently running an early beta version, but I am expecting an update that
will contain a complete FAL, extra NCP screens, and the ability to DL load the
node database (by area, etc). Mail will be implemented, but file transfer is
the current top priority. Lot's of good things planned.
If anyone would like a demo (I'm in LKG), send me some mail. I'd prefer
after hours (^5pm), but we can work things out.
Steve
|
3541.5 | but will we be allowed to use it? | CIMNET::KYZIVAT | Paul Kyzivat | Sat Mar 10 1990 22:52 | 12 |
| Since it appears that DECnet and X may soon be a reality for Ami...
Has Digital established a policy yet about Easynet nodes running over
dialup links, especially from "non-DEC" hosts? Since they have started
getting picky about security of normal nodes, I assume they would look
askance at Amigas running over dialup lines.
Clearly this is a problem that will need to be solved before long - now
that DECwindows is becoming a normal operating mode people will need to use
it from home, but I haven't heard any discussion of it.
Paul
|
3541.6 | | ELWOOD::PETERS | | Mon Mar 12 1990 00:02 | 15 |
|
DECnet policy seems to be made both at a local level and company
wide. At least in our DECnet area, DECnet node names and numbers are
a very tight resource ( this should change with phase V ). We are
required to write a justification and pass a local review board.
For security reasons, dial-up DECnet connections are not allowed.
I have heard that X-windows will be support over a LAT type
connection. This may get around a number of problems.
Steve Peters
|
3541.7 | | UFP::LARUE | Jeff LaRue - MAA Senior Network Consultant | Mon Mar 12 1990 11:24 | 5 |
| Re: .5, .6
In the Mid-Atlantic Area (36.*), we too are out of node address space......
however, our local DIS folks do allow dial-up DECnet.
-Jeff
|
3541.8 | A few more snapshots | WHAMMY::SPODARYK | Binary Throttle | Mon Mar 12 1990 12:55 | 9 |
| I've added another small archive to tape::user2:[upload]x11_pics_2.zoo.
This archive contains two more X11 snapshots. They are similar, and
show the Amiga making use of the DECwindows Window Manager, and
running the DECwindows Session Manager, along with other applications.
Now, I'd like to get Motif. :^)
Steve
|
3541.9 | | MSVAX::BARRETT | I'm not one, but I play one on TV | Fri Aug 31 1990 14:15 | 4 |
| Re: .3 (Ethernet through cable TV)
As I understand it, the project is still underway and has a couple
of homes cabled. Jim Albryt is running it -- see the TELEWORK notefile.
|
3541.10 | more DECnet news | WHAMMY::SPODARYK | digging for fire | Sat Oct 27 1990 18:33 | 38 |
| I'm back running TSSnet/X-Windows on my Amiga, this time with a real-live
CBM A2065 (LAN Ethernet Card). I am using TSSnet V1.02-ft1, which is
currently in field test. My node name is "myAmi".
This release finally has the "long-awaited" file tranfer utilities.
Hopefully Mail will make it into the V1.02 release, but no definite word
yet. I expect a new ft version within a couple of weeks.
From the manual:
The TSSnet file utilities are a set of programs that allow the user to perform
various types of file transfer between the Amiga and any other DECnet node,
including another Amiga running TSSnet. The utilities are very similar to
the AmigaDOS copy, list, rename, delete, and type commands and must be run
from an AmigaDOS Shell window, like those commands. The commands available
are:
dcp Copy files to or from remote nodes
dls List information about remote files
dmv Rename files on remote nodes
dcat Type files that reside on remote nodes
dexec Execute a command script on a remote node
dpr Print a file on a remote node's printer
More of my comments: They work well.
It's pretty slick to transparently access your Amigas files from your VAX
(and vice-versa). V1.02 will combine all these utilities into one NFT
type utility, similar to the DECnet-DOS scheme. Mail will look like VAX-mail,
but with some (needed) improvements such as store-and-forward.
Both NFT and Mail will also have a nice graphical interface, in the near
future. Right now they are both strictly shell/window. There are other
improvements to NCP, etc.
If anyone would like a demo, let me know and we can set up a time.
Steve
|
3541.11 | TSSnet released yet? | FSDEV2::JBERNARD | John Bernard 297-2563 MR01-1/L87 | Wed Jun 05 1991 15:36 | 9 |
| I haven't seen any activity on this topic since October... How is
TSSnet doing? Is it available, what hardware is recommended (CBM
Ethernet card/ASDG LAN Rover/EnLAN/etc..).
I have a 3000 at work and need some info to make a purchase of
"the right stuff".
John
|
3541.12 | | ELWOOD::PETERS | | Wed Jun 05 1991 17:36 | 13 |
|
I saw a demo of the TSSnet, X-windows, and CBM ethernet card at
DECUS. The set-up worked well. They were running DECwrite and Notes
on a VS3100 with the display on the AMIGA 3000.
I asked about ethernet cards and was told to buy CBM. GVP has
had trouble with their card and are no longer selling it.
As for TSSnet, I don't think anyone else does DECnet. There are
a couple of TCP/IP software packages.
Steve P.
|
3541.13 | not much news - maybe I'll call | WHAMMY::spodaryk | For three strange days... | Wed Jun 05 1991 18:45 | 19 |
| No new news from Syndesis. I haven't received anything from them lately,
so the last info in here about TSSnet is probably still valid. I haven't
seen 'mail' yet, it's been RSN for about a year now - sound familiar?
I believe Ameristar is still selling an Ethernet board. However, I just
received a note from Dale which states that Ameristar is dropping their
TCP/IP package, and recommending people to use CBM's software. Interestingly,
the TCP/IP package lists at $275, while DECnet is $395.
I've been happy with the CBM board, but believe the Ameristar might perform
better. Steve Sullivan may have more details.
Also in the note is the "announcement" of the X11R4 server as well as
various Programmer Toolkits. This server sports improved performance,
as well as new extensions (SHAPE and MULTIBUFFERING), and other features.
The Motif WM, toolkit, and UIL is running under AmigaDOS, and will be out
later this year.
Steve
|
3541.14 | What about an IBM PC Ethernet card? | CVG::PETTENGILL | mulp | Thu Jun 06 1991 20:46 | 3 |
| I'm still coming up to speed (slow speed) on Amiga, but if an Amiga has
PC slots, can you use a PC Ethernet controller in it? For example, the
DEC EtherWORKS LC (DE100) with a list price in DECdirect of $272.
|
3541.15 | Bridgeboard | WHAMMY::spodaryk | For three strange days... | Fri Jun 07 1991 11:56 | 12 |
| If you've got a Bridgeboard, I don't see any reason why you couldn't use
a PC Ethernet board. However, the CBM A2065 can be had for (approx) $250
brand new, and doesn't require any additional hardware. The software
that implements DECnet and TCP/IP isn't cheap, though.
Is it possible to access the PC slots with the IBM emulator that people
are using? If so, maybe someone could write a driver to utilize a DE100.
Those kind of hardware specifics are probably outside the scope of the
emulator, however it's supposed to be real good.
Steve
|
3541.16 | CBM = Ameristar? | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Fri Jun 07 1991 16:41 | 9 |
| Re: .13
>I've been happy with the CBM board, but believe the Ameristar might perform
>better. Steve Sullivan may have more details.
I had heard that the CBM board was the Ameristar board: Commodore bought
the design.
Can anyone confirm or deny this?
|
3541.17 | | WHAMMY::spodaryk | For three strange days... | Fri Jun 07 1991 17:02 | 8 |
| Randy,
I can neither confirm, nor deny that - but I think you're right.
The board that performed better than the CBM board was the ASDG model.
At least that's what I recall. Ultrix and NutraSweet have ruined my
short term memory :^)
Steve
|
3541.18 | | IAMNRA::SULLIVAN | You only play the games that you know you can lose | Fri Jun 07 1991 17:23 | 15 |
| Randy,
Commodore's Ethernet card is a re-layout of the Ameristar. Very minor changes,
with only one pal changed - presumably to get the autoconfig to provide
Commodore as the manufacturer. I have used both, and in both pal configs.
The ASDG board does go very fast with little CPU overhead, but there is a
problem when using it with Syndesis DECnet. It will slow down and eventually
hang. This does not seem to happen with unaccelerated Amigas (68000 based).
There seems only a very very low priority for fixing this problem at
Syndesis and/or ASDG. This makes the Commodore board the only viable
choice, though it seems to have worked with the GVP card (which was the
Hydra card, and the only viable option on an A500/A1000).
-SES
|
3541.19 | No DE-XXX feasible | FROCKY::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Mon Jun 10 1991 04:05 | 9 |
| Re: .15
>Is it possible to access the PC slots with the IBM emulator that people
>are using?
Nope, since there is no physical connection (other than DC lines) between the
Amiga and the PC slots. So you would need _at_ least a "dummy" bridgeboard.
<CB>
|