T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3488.1 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Thu Feb 15 1990 18:35 | 13 |
| it is true. But CBM also has a tradition of developing a lot of
things that never actually ship. They are also supposed to be working
on a new 8 bit computer.
I'd settle for just an Amiga CD interface. Atari has been promising
a CD player for a couple years, but the price of the hardware isn't cheap
enough yet (I think they wanted to sell it for $600, it would be
capable of reading CD ROMs and playing music CDs). Anybody know
what the current prices in the pc world are for something that can
do that?
-Dave
|
3488.2 | C=65 on the half-shelf anyone? | LEVERS::MEYER | Dave Meyer | Thu Feb 15 1990 22:49 | 4 |
| FWIW: they are not working on a new 8-bit computer. They are sitting
on it. The computer is essentially complete and ready to go to market,
over Copperman's dead body. I suspect that a CD interface or drive
would stand a much better chance of getting out the door.
|
3488.3 | CDs already interfaced | RIPPLE::LUKE_TE | | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:31 | 6 |
| What do you mean by CD interface? VIVA authoring system already
lets you interface to CDs as well as the Director. It seems like
there were a couple of others as well that we listed in the Amiga
World magazine that had Multimedia as its main theme (Jan 90? -
it even listed the CD players supported)
|
3488.4 | I just woke up! | RIPPLE::LUKE_TE | | Fri Feb 16 1990 14:10 | 6 |
| re .3
Whoops! I was in a different world when I wrote that one. I got
my CDs and Laser disks confused. The references in .3 are to laser
disks which are video based - not music on CDs or data on CD roms.
|
3488.5 | Hardware isn't the problem? | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Fri Feb 16 1990 17:00 | 7 |
| Re: .1
> I'd settle for just an Amiga CD interface.
I think you've already got that. It's called a SCSI host adapter.
The problem is that no one has written any AmigaDOS filesystem that
reads any standard CD/ROM formats.
|
3488.6 | | ELWOOD::PETERS | | Fri Feb 16 1990 17:22 | 12 |
|
Yes, SCSI is the interface to connect CDROMS to an Amiga. The
CDROM drive DEC uses in the 3100 systems, is a SCSI drive that uses
the disk common command set. This means it looks exactly like a very
big disk.
You should be careful that the CDROM drive you buy supports the
disk common command set. If not you will need a special driver.
Steve Peters
Tape/Optical Eng.
|
3488.7 | Crossdos ? | NOTIBM::MCGHIE | Thank Heaven for small Murphys ! | Sun Feb 18 1990 20:55 | 4 |
| If you had a track-disk type driver suitable for use with a SCSI CDROM
could you use CrossDOS to read MS-DOS compatible CDROMS ?
Mike
|
3488.8 | | ELWOOD::PETERS | | Mon Feb 19 1990 17:56 | 8 |
| re .7
The idea of using crossDos will not work. The CDROM disks are not
in MS-DOS format. CDROM use something called ISO 9660 . This standard
was written for use with CDROM only.
Steve Peters
|
3488.9 | Device drivers and File Systems | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Mon Feb 19 1990 17:57 | 38 |
| Re: .7
The driver isn't a problem: as .6 points out that the CD/ROM drive
(or at least the right type of CD/ROM drive) acts just like a
SCSI disk. Therefore, the device driver that you would use would
just be the device driver you would normally use.
In other words, in the mountlist entry for the CD/ROM drive, the
Device= line would look the same as the Device= for any of your
hard disks. The system can access any particular block on the
CD/ROM the same way it can access any block on a hard disk, and
that is the only thing that a device driver needs to know.
However, the layout of data on the CD/ROM is different. Block number
10000 might be the start of the root directory on an AmigaDOS hard disk,
but on a CD/ROM block number 10000 might data in the middle of
a file. CD/ROM directory entries probably look completely different
from AmigaDOS directory entries, as well as being stored at different
block numbers. The interpretation of the blocks on a disk is controlled
by the file system mounted on the device.
In other words, the mountlist entry for the CD/ROM would have a
FileSystem= entry that doesn't say FileSystem=l:fastfilesystem,
but might say something like FileSystem=l:cdromfilesystem.
I don't know enough about CrossDOS to know if it will work with
alternate device drivers (I bought CrossDOS months ago from System
Eyes but haven't used it yet). I remember that CrossDOS also provided
an alternate device driver for the floppy drives. As long as CrossDOS
didn't make the MS/DOS file system rely on special device commands in
the special floppy handler, you should be able to use the CrossDOS
MS/DOS file system with a CD/ROM (or a hard disk, for that matter).
I'm no expert on CD/ROMS. I was under the impression that there was
a standard format for CD/ROMs laid out called "High Sierra." I don't
know if all or most CD/ROMs use this format, or if most CD/ROMs are
in a machine specific format that imitates the normal disk format of
the machine.
|
3488.10 | just a filesystem | NOTIBM::MCGHIE | Thank Heaven for small Murphys ! | Mon Feb 19 1990 21:34 | 7 |
| So, ok,
CrossDos doesn't do the job, but as I thought its 'simply' a
filesystem handler rather than a whole device driver that is needed ??
Regards
Mike
|
3488.11 | | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Tue Feb 20 1990 13:57 | 5 |
| Re: .10
Exactly right!
Any volunteers to write the needed file system?
|
3488.12 | | ELWOOD::PETERS | | Wed Feb 21 1990 23:45 | 14 |
| re .9
Randy is right about "High Sierra" format. The working group for
CDROM formats was called High Sierra. This format was later submitted
to ISO and became ISO 9660.
re .11
I have been looking into writing a CDROM file system. Right now
this is low on my to-do list, but if I found something on CDROM I
wanted it might get done.
Steve Peters
|
3488.13 | What about RRD40? | CSC32::D_WHITE | | Tue May 15 1990 15:02 | 8 |
| Just curious -- has anyone tried to connect an RRD40 to their system?
I have access to one which is just collecting dust. Although it seems
like it would be compatible in terms of SCSI protocol, the cabling
would present a problem (especially for someone who is not hardware-
oriented). Then, too, there is a question of what you would be able
to do with it once it was connected... Any thoughts on this?
Dave
|
3488.14 | RRD40 works | ELWOOD::PETERS | | Tue May 15 1990 15:53 | 18 |
|
re .13
Yes, a RRD40 will work on an AMIGA. The SCSI connector is a
standard 50 pin flat ribbon cable. The SCSI commands set for the
RRD40 follows the ANSI specification for SCSI DISK common command set
( SCSI-I ). We when through a lot of work to make it look like a disk.
The only problem is data format of the disk. You need to write your
own file system handler. DEC's CD uses a subset of ODS-2 called
UNIFILE. The rest of the world uses ISO 9660 file system on CDs.
After the file system was working, you need software that
understands the data.
Steve Peters
Tape/Optical Eng.
( currently with the SCSI buyout group ).
|