T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3429.1 | Memory Location prices | KALI::PLOUFF | Anarchists of the world, unite! | Sun Feb 04 1990 01:53 | 14 |
| Yesterday (Saturday) I checked out this article at Memory Location in
Wellesley, Mass. They seemed a bit confused about prices beyond the
basic A2000, but quoted:
Model Price with Tradein
----- ------------------
A2000 $899
A2000HD $1699
Offer good until March 31
A $800 premium for a hard disk sounds rather high, so I suspect one of
these numbers is off. But the deal is indeed real.
Wes
|
3429.2 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Sun Feb 04 1990 03:17 | 10 |
|
So... the trick this time is to find a dealer that just wants the
keyboard to send in? (there has been mention on the usenet of
folks running an A2000 keyboard on a A1000) I think that keyboard
costs about $130 at the CBM repair places.
After all, what are the dealers supposed to do with the A1000 box
without the keyboard?
-Dave
|
3429.3 | | LEDS3::ACCIARDI | | Sun Feb 04 1990 07:23 | 16 |
|
It looks to me like this may be a strong message to A1000 owners that
THIS IS YOUR LAST CHANCE to get with the program. Future versions of
the Amiga OS will simply not work in a 512K environment. If you are
happy with v 1.3 and feel that your current software will satisfy your
needs for all eternity, fine.
In spite of this offer being extended (in various forms) for the third
time, there will be the usual rantings from those who feel that
Commodore owes them free hardware upgrades for life. To those who feel
that CBM has been grossly unfair, I direct you to Apple's generous
upgrade policy for Mac + to Mac SE (ie; throw away Plus and purchase
new SE) or MacIIcx to MacIIci ($2300 motherboard swap).
Ed.
|
3429.4 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Sun Feb 04 1990 08:34 | 14 |
| re: simply not work in a 512K environment
But the A1000 isn't limited to 512K. It isn't as cheap to upgrade
to >512K as the A500, but it can be done without hacking on the
hardware.
For those of us considering doing the trade-in, I imagine the big
questions are how to migrate the peripherals to the A2000. I remember
some company selling adapter board, has anybody tried it? is
it still available? Is there a board available in the US that
will provide a loadable kickstart without having to buy the
68020 or 68030 board?
-Dave
|
3429.5 | I'd upgrade now! | SALEM::LEIMBERGER | | Mon Feb 05 1990 04:26 | 18 |
| I think this is the time all 1000 owners should start looking
to upgrade. While it is true that the 1000 can be expanded beyound
512k I don't think this is the issue. I feel the answer is more
in tune with the fatter agnus,and the extended chip set. I also
feel that CBM has gone overboard in it's effort to support the 1000
system,and knowing it will not have the ability to do so in the
future is offering a do or die package to 1000 owners. I see two
ways the 1000 owners can go
1) run out and buy all the software you think you will need,and
be content to know that any updates to registered owners may very
well not run on the 1000.
2)upgrade.
In the past I have looked at the 1000 as a good alternative
to not owning an amiga. However I would not recommend a 1000 to
a new user today. I would highly discourage such a purchase. The
current 1000 owners are mostly pretty savvy,and could get by for
a while,but a new user would not have a prayer.
bill
|
3429.6 | What's new in Germany ??? | NBOIS2::FRIES | Die Wohnung ist schon weg !!! | Mon Feb 05 1990 05:04 | 16 |
|
> Well folks, Commodore is finally trying to orphan the A-1000. They
> have reinstituted the A-1000 trade in towards a A-2000 deal. Here
> are the prices.
> Your A-1000 plus $999 for a 2000
> Your A-1000 plus $1599 for a 2000HD
> Your A-1000 plus $2999 for a 2500/30
It seems to be a bad choice in Germany.
A new B2000 costs about DM1800 (US$1000).
Is there a way to make a deal in Germany, too???
Cheers
Gerald
|
3429.7 | how much is the trade in in $$$ | MSVAX::ROSCETTI | A Spurious Char@cter | Wed Feb 07 1990 14:00 | 13 |
|
Out of curiosity... does anyone know the price of a 2000 without
trade in.
I bought my 1000 as a "spare", so I could drag it to work for
downloads, let the kids play games ( keeps them off the 500 ).
While I like having the second system ( only cost $100), if the
trade in allowance is good enough I might not be able to pass it
up. I'll probably sell the 500 too.
brien
|
3429.8 | | ELWOOD::PETERS | | Wed Feb 07 1990 16:20 | 11 |
|
The list price for an AMIGA 2000 is $1999.00 . To use the
Amiga 1000 trade-in the Amiga 2000 MUST be sold for list price. So,
you get $1000 off list price ( you pay $999 ).
The memory location price for a AMIGA 2000 is about $1600.00 .
Steve Peters
who just traded in an old 1000
|
3429.9 | Enquiring minds want to know... | KALI::PLOUFF | It came from the... dessert! | Thu Feb 08 1990 11:37 | 13 |
| Since a few people have by now taken advantage of the offer, perhaps
they could share their experiences. Some questions...
Does any New England dealer deviate from the prices in .0? (Are my
quotes in .1 wrong?)
Has anyone tried to keep or buy back the A1000 system unit?
Any extras in the A2000 packages? For instance, for a while some
dealers were adding the old 8088 Bridgeboards at no charge, presumably
to clear out inventory.
Wes
|
3429.10 | Only keyboard needed | ENOVAX::BARRETT | The optical mouse that roared | Thu Feb 08 1990 17:21 | 7 |
| The dealer here in Connecticut says you can keep the A1000 unit, all
he wants is the keyboard. (a $900 keyboard!)
I say keep the unit. Use it as a mouse-only system, BBS, serial-port
CLI, or hack a keyboard! It will always play games.
|
3429.11 | I ain't have no money! | 31783::SOO | Life begins at 4000 r.p.m. | Thu Feb 08 1990 17:50 | 1 |
| Anybody knows how long is this offer going to be on?
|
3429.12 | Free Amiga 1000, sans keyboard? | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Thu Feb 08 1990 18:08 | 7 |
| Re: .9
The "Just give me keyboard, keep the system box" trade-in:
On a recent Fish disk, there was a little software keyboard. You clicked
the mouse on it software keyboard's keys, and it would send keystrokes
to another window.
|
3429.13 | Commodore seems serious about this! | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Thu Feb 08 1990 18:15 | 12 |
| The latest Amiga World has a full page ad from Commodore advertising
the trade-in deal. Prices are stated for all of the different models
of the 2000: Vanilla 2000, the 2000HD, the 2500HD, etc.
This is the first time to my knowledge that Commodore has ever
advertised the 1000 buy back deal.
Given that they are offering the program again, and that they
want the 1000 disabled (no keyboard), and that they are advertising
the program, I suspect that the theories expressed in previous
replies is correct. Commodore wants to drop support for the 1000,
and is making a major effort to buy up the machines.
|
3429.15 | | ELWOOD::PETERS | | Thu Feb 08 1990 18:48 | 14 |
|
re .9
I have talked with 2 dealers here and both dealers said that the
Amiga 1000 must be removed from service. CBM only wants the keyboard
as proof, but any dealer that offers any deal to "buy back" or sell
the Amiga 1000 is asking for trouble. As always, I'm sure you will find
some dealer that thinks he will not get caught.
As for time, the deal is scheduled to last until the end of March.
Steve
|
3429.16 | Isn't it similar to not trading in? | ENOVAX::BARRETT | The optical mouse that roared | Thu Feb 08 1990 23:06 | 7 |
| Well it seems to me that if the dealer is simply to throw the thing
away, that there really isn't anything to "get caught" at. My dealer's
attitude is "what would I do with the thing". It seems to me that once
CBM officially drops the A1000, it doesn't make a difference if you
have one to them. Besides, I know several people that are keeping
theirs.
|
3429.17 | | ELWOOD::PETERS | | Fri Feb 09 1990 00:31 | 15 |
|
re .16
I understand the attitude. I also see CBM working very hard to
improve their image. I just hope these people don't cause problems
for CBM when they need a part or later sell the machine to a new
Amiga user. CBM is paying money to prevent these kinds of problems.
The "get caught" comes more from honesty than anything else. When
the dealer sends the keyboard and paper work to CBM he states that he
has followed the terms of the upgrade. In this case he has not.
Steve
|
3429.18 | What about us Canucks?? | POLAR::GOSLING | | Fri Feb 09 1990 11:45 | 16 |
|
How about us Canadians? Are we going to get hosed again? A quick
call to CBM Canada indicated that they were thinking about it. A
call to one of the local (and largest in Ottawa) Amiga dealers
resulted in a "don't hold your breath" response.
Any of you folks in Montreal, Toronto, or Calgary heard anything
different? Any of your local user groups discussing the issue?
Maybe I should just go south of the border and trade up. Not what
I want to do, but I'm tired of being treated like a second cousin.
Art
|
3429.19 | Exchanges deal in great white north. | MQOFS::LEDOUX | Reserved for Future Use | Fri Feb 09 1990 14:28 | 29 |
|
I am not sure the deal is "from" Commodore, but a store in
Montreal offers the following deal:
All prices in Canadian $. Remove 18% to convert in US$.
(but add 9% for provincial sales tax.)
B2000 $2100.00 (base model, normal price)
$1500.00 if given a A1000 in exchange
$2080.00 " " " " " " (B2000HD)
$1500.00 if given a C64 in exchange
$2080.00 " " " C64 " " (B2000HD)
$1300.00 " " " A500 " "
$1800.00 " " " A500 " " (B2000HD)
$1430.00 " " an IBM " " (YES, an IBM!!!)
$1980.00 " " " " " " " " " (B2000HD)
Note the "C64" is 64-1541-1802
One other deal is that if you want to buy a "full price" B2000
($2100.00) you can get an IBM. 640K, 101 Keys, 5�" drive ect for
$200.00 more.
P.S. Pay in May, no interrest...
I beleive it's not bad..
Vince.
|
3429.20 | I can't decide | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | I happen to like rodents | Sat Feb 10 1990 03:08 | 34 |
| Okay, time to start some trouble ;^). Why should I upgrade to an A2xxx?
With the barrage (well two or three constitutes a barrage, doesn't it?)
of "turn-your-A1000-into-not-quite-an-A2000" boards on their way, wouldn't
upgrading the existing A1000 be a viable solution? Just supposin' that
one of these products delivers 80% of its claims in a semi-seamless
fashion, wouldn't that be swell? For instance, at about half the
upgrade price, the DVS Wonder claims:
o Use of the Fat or Enhanced Agnus (512k or 1meg of Chip ram)
o Use of the Enhanced Denise.
o Software select one of three Kickstart ROMS; 1.2, 1.3, or 1.4.
o A2000 compatible Clock, with battery backup.
And for those of us having trouble justifying new capital purchases to
them finance people, there's the cheapskate's build it yourself version
Okay, on the down side, there are no processor/bridgeboard, video, or
expansion slots, and the serial and parallel ports could be a headache
for those digi-view/perfect sound type devices (assuming that the A1000
versions will be discontinued). Also, the "support" disk mentioned for
the DVS sounds a little frightening. Oh, and you'd probably want to
adapt an A2000 keyboard to the whole mess.
I'd love to upgrade to an A2000, but I really like the A1000. It's got
a keyboard garage, aesthetically pleasing to the eye, and the mouse,
joystick, and keyboard ports are in the right place. The Mon'AMI'Jr.
takes care of the expansion slots quite nicely and who needs those
stinking I*M slots anyways.
Please help me make a decision! Remember, this offer expires March 31st...
Pete
P.s. All tax-deductible donations to the "Help-Petey-Buy-An-A2000" fund
can be sent to me, Petey, c/o DEC @NIO/A6.
|
3429.21 | | ENOVAX::BARRETT | The optical mouse that roared | Sat Feb 10 1990 18:34 | 5 |
| I just returned from my dealer. The letter from Comodore to dealers
does not say anything about turning in your entire 1000 - just the
keyboard. Their opinion is that the other dealers did not read it
correctly. I'm beginning to believe that it is not necessary to turn
your 1000 CPUs in to any dealer. Maybe someone should call CBM and ask?
|
3429.22 | Go for it, especially at those US prices... | FRAMBO::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Mon Feb 12 1990 10:22 | 11 |
| Re: .20
I'd advise you to have the DSV folks signing a document that their
claims are true, especially regarding the ECS Denise and KS 1.4.
Anything short of the DSV stuff (if it works!) will leave you pretty
much in a vacuum in the not to far future...
Regards,
<CB>_who's_speaking_too_much_again
|
3429.23 | 1.4 rom only? | SALEM::LEIMBERGER | | Mon Feb 12 1990 10:57 | 5 |
| Of course I don't expect 1.4 to come on floppy this time around.So
if you want to run 1.4 you may have to upgrade.Any means of putting
1.4 on a 1000 short of buying the rom kit would most likely not
be legal.
bill
|
3429.24 | I predict: 1.4 Kickstart on floppy as well as ROM | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Mon Feb 12 1990 19:28 | 13 |
| Re: .23
> Of course I don't expect 1.4 to come on floppy this time around.
I expect that 1.4 WILL be shipped on floppy. I expect Kickstart to
be shipped on a floppy until AmigaDOS doesn't run on a Amiga 1000.
I'll be very surprised if 1.4 out right breaks the 1000. Unless they
are going to require the extended chip set or one meg of chip ram, I
don't see what Commodore could do to break the 1000.
I do see the possibility that running 1.4 on a 512K machine might
not be worth it.
|
3429.25 | why not wait to upgrade? | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Mon Feb 12 1990 19:42 | 25 |
|
To complicated things a bit further :-)
Your options are:
1. trade-in the 1000+$1000 for a 2000
2. trade-in the 1000's keyboard+$1000 for a 2000
(if you find a dealer willing to do that)
and buy a 2000 keyboard to put on the 1000
3. Wait for 1.4 to come out, then buy a new 2000 with the 1.4 ROM and
the enhanced chip set. Maybe by then the list price might even
be cheaper due to increased price competition from VGA/80386
pc clones.
Use the 1000 to run all that stuff that breaks on 1.4, or broke
with 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3.
With options 1 & 2, you will still need to buy the 1.4 ROM and the
new Denise chip. So you should add approx. $200? to the cost of
buying now instead of waiting. Also consider if CBM comes out with
a 32 bit bus box, that might be a better investment than the current
2000 box.
-Dave
|
3429.26 | extended chip set -> 1.4 hope so | SALEM::LEIMBERGER | | Tue Feb 13 1990 07:02 | 21 |
| If CBM comes out with a 32 bit machine I'd expect the price to be
quite high,and as for lower 2000 prices due to competition from
IBM ect: We already offer much more for less money,I don't think
that we need lower prices to be competive.Sure you can get barebone
386,286 systems fairly cheap but they cannot compare with the 2000.
I know one person who wants to upgrade but lacks funds.Now if
you cannot upgrade for 1000.00 doubt you will be able to take
advantage of any price decrease that may come in the near future.
In regards to 1.4 I know nothing about it but I hope to god that
CBM does base 1.4 on the new chipset,making it required. It seems
foolish to bring around a new operating revision and not take FULL
advantage of the new chipset.I want to see 1.4 intergrated with
the new chips as close as possible,even if it means I'll have to
run 1.3 until I can afford the chipset update.Maybe this is why
the push to kill off the 1000. This last update may not do this
but I feel the intent is there.CBM will be able to say "you had
plenty of chances" to any disgruntled 1000 holdouts. The 1000 is
still very usefull(i know of several full blown units) but it will
take the exceptional hacker to keep up with 1.4. I still say cut
your losses now ,and run with the upgrade.
bill
|
3429.27 | doubt requirement | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Tue Feb 13 1990 08:02 | 5 |
| I doubt that 1.4 will _require_ the new chipset, for the same reason
that Workbench 1.3 did not _require_ Kickstart 1.3: it's too hard to
co�rdinate simultaneous releases. I do expect that 1.4 will take
advantage of the new chipset, if it is present.
John Sauter
|
3429.28 | Once you have the cover off... | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Tue Feb 13 1990 18:41 | 12 |
| Re: .27
> I doubt that 1.4 will _require_ the new chipset, for the same reason
> that Workbench 1.3 did not _require_ Kickstart 1.3: it's too hard to
> co�rdinate simultaneous releases.
I don't believe that 1.4 will require the new chip set, but I'm, not
completely willing to rule it out. For a ROM based system to use 1.4,
you will have to take it to the dealer's and have him replace the
Kickstart ROMs. Since the system has to be in the shop anyway, Commodore
could conceivably require the extended chip set to be installed
as part of the upgrade.
|
3429.29 | | NOTIBM::MCGHIE | Thank Heaven for small Murphys ! | Tue Feb 13 1990 18:44 | 9 |
| I also would be surprised if 1.4 required the new chipset. All of those
people out there who use Amigas and aren't real computer nuts would not
be to impressed.
Aha I hear you say they don't need to upgrade, true, but what about
software manufacturers who distribute their software on Amigados disks?
Regards
Mike
|
3429.30 | If not 1.4, then maybe 1.5 | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Tue Feb 13 1990 19:16 | 11 |
| Re: .9
I find it hard to believe that _some_ upgrade of AmigaDOS will not
require the new chipset. I don't think that it will that big of
a problem for the non-computer nuts. Upgrading the operating system
of a ROM based computer means taking it into a dealer and having
him or her replace some components. To the non-compiler freak,
whether that replacement is just swap some ROMs or swap ROMS and
custom chips is invisible (except for the price). And the
price can be explained if you can show new features, like non-interlaced
high res.
|
3429.31 | | BOMBE::MOORE | Eat or be eaten | Tue Feb 13 1990 21:19 | 2 |
| But a lot of people will probably never use non-interlaced hi-res
because it requires an expensive (multi-sync) monitor, right?
|
3429.32 | The monitor problem | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Tue Feb 13 1990 22:40 | 14 |
| Re: .31
> But a lot of people will probably never use non-interlaced hi-res
> because it requires an expensive (multi-sync) monitor, right?
Multi-sync monitors are getting down to the $400 to $500 price range, which
isn't that much more expensive than regular monitors.
I've been recommending for a long time that people not by the Commodore
monitor, but instead invest in a reasonable multi-sync. I wish that
Commodore and dealers wouldn't push the 1080 (1084) monitors so much:
it would be better for people to get a monitor that will allow them
to use all the Amiga's features in the future, and to have to sell
the 1080 and buy a new monitor if they want non-interlaced high res.
|
3429.33 | | HEAD::GATES | | Wed Feb 14 1990 06:23 | 7 |
| I'm thinking of buying a monitor for my amiga but I have not heard
of multi-sync monitors. Could someone put in a simple explanation
of how they work, the advantages over an ordinary monitor and any
software that makes use of their extra (?) facilities?
Thanks,
Barry.
|
3429.34 | | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Wed Feb 14 1990 07:32 | 17 |
|
See note 3473.3.
If I may, I'd recommend the Princeton Ultrasync for around $450 (mail
order). The Princeton features 800 x 600 pixels and has very crisp
text and excellent color. It's a 12" monitor, but the display can be
infinitely adjusted for both height and width to fill up the display
area or shrink it down.
Another good choice is the Mitsubishi Diamondscan model(s), which, in
addition to doing what multisyncs do, also feature composite video
input, which is nice if you're going to be recording to videotape.
Pick up a copy of Computer Shopper if you need to find prices or
availability of monitors.
Ed.
|
3429.35 | | MQOFS::DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Wed Feb 14 1990 09:47 | 19 |
| I know that most (some???) of us have "full blown" Amigas (2000 with
lots of memory, multisynced flicker-fixed monitors...) but isn't
software done for the common denominator like 500s with at the most 1
meg and two floppies?
Jean
When I bought my 2000, I also bought a NEC multisync II. Not too long
ago, I bought a flicker fixer, and sold the pair a week after, the
reason: the flicker fixer is not compatible with a genlock unless a
small dauther board is added (and then only for the Amigen and
Supergen), the display is smaller (ok, slightly), and I still needed an
extra monitor to see what was coming out of my frame grabber. Now I'm
happy as a lark with the RGB port feeding the genlock then the frame
grabber and then the monitor, a C=1080!
Oh, when I had the multisync with NO flicker fixer, a LOT of games
would NOT work because the screen would "roll" (50hz pal????)
|
3429.36 | | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Wed Feb 14 1990 10:15 | 24 |
|
Jean, I've never had the problems you described with my FlickerFixer.
Is it possible that your board is bad?
The beauty of the Flicker Fixer is that it does it's thing AFTER the
video signal has left the Denise chip. It steals no CPU cycles or
video memory.
About the only negative effect of the FF is that some games with very
fast horizontal scrolling may blur.
As far as the picture size goes, that is why I recommended the
Princeton. The Princeton can scale the display up or down to account
for any changes that the FF introduces to the final display. It can
also shift the entire display up, down, left or right.
Actually, I think an ideal solution to this whole issue of new graphics
modes would be for Commodore to release a monitor with built-in frame
buffer AND user-selectable NTSC.
If Commodore doesn't drive the technology, the poor userbase will
simply become confused with all the different video solutions.
Ed.
|
3429.37 | | MQOFS::DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Wed Feb 14 1990 10:32 | 14 |
| If you don't have a genlock, you don't have any problems. As for the
rolling screen, this was experienced in pre-flicker fixer days, if you
have the right cable, you could try it yourself by disconnecting the FF
and connecting the monitor directly to the RGB port and trying some
games like Packmania, flacon early version (these are the ones that
come to mind) and most if not all demos coming from Europe. Then again
this could have been a problem with the NEC and may not show up on your
princeton monitor.
The flicker fixer did it's job quite nicely, but the C= monitor was a
more attractive solution to me anyway.
Jean
|
3429.38 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Thu Feb 15 1990 19:53 | 55 |
| A3000 rumor, why settle for upgrading to a mere A2000 or A2500 :-)
Path: shlump.nac.dec.com!decwrl!lll-winken!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!prls!pyramid!wjvax!mel
From: [email protected] (Mel Tolentino)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: A3000 Debuts in Paris
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 14 Feb 90 10:28:43 GMT
Reply-To: [email protected] (Mel Tolentino)
Organization: Watkins-Johnson Co., San Jose
Lines: 43
This is all hardware isn't it...?
I've summarized the following info from a local BBS and seems fairly reliable.
Further comments or info would be appreciated.
A3000 DEBUTS IN PARIS!!!!!!!!!
* 68030 16 or 25Mhz on the Motherboard (asynchronous)!
* 32 bit bus for memory and I/O (backward compatible with ZorroII)
* 50 Mb hard drive (don't know if SCSI)
* 2 megs Chip Ram!
* Flicker-Fixer included
* 1.4 ECS giving virtual screen 1280 x 485 pixels w/wo interlace.
* Smaller nicer case with PC slots and 4 Amiga expansion slots.
* Power switch on front, keyboard connector on side.
* Price unknown :-( !
I'm a little disappointed that newer graphic modes were not introduced but
feel the 32 bit bus plus asynchronous 68030 will make this one quick machine!
The BBS I got this from is JDR-BBS located in San Jose, Ca (408) 559-0253
-Mel
oo
jj
ww ww jj
ww www ww jj jj
ww ww jjjj
Mel Tolentino (Watkins-Johnson Co. San Jose, Calif.)
{{..!{hplabs,ucbvax,sun}!pyramid,..!decwrl!qubix}!wjvax!mel
|
3429.39 | Wow ! | KETJE::VLASIU | | Fri Feb 16 1990 03:28 | 4 |
| This sounds really great ! It represents a new generation Ami which
could have maybe a better chance on the professional market.
Sorin
|
3429.40 | | FROCKY::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Fri Feb 16 1990 06:42 | 12 |
| Re: .38
Well, I'll keep to my end of the non-disclosure agreement, but let
me tell you folks one thing:
Don't believe everything you read (means: some of this info is
definitivly false).
I'm truly sorry that it took less than a week for some moron to
spill those infos. I sure know how the folks who are developing
the fault-tolorant VAX must feel about early disclosures...
<CB>
|
3429.41 | Good one ! | AYOV28::ATHOMSON | C'mon, git aff! /The Kelty Clippie | Fri Feb 16 1990 07:31 | 11 |
| re: -.1
� Well, I'll keep to my end of the non-disclosure agreement, but let
� me tell you folks one thing:
� Don't believe everything you read (means: some of this info is
� definitivly false).
Well done Christian! I was wondering how to say that without
compromising the NDA.
Alan T.
|
3429.42 | Will kickstart 1.4 be available on disk | ACESMK::SNIDER | | Fri Feb 16 1990 09:40 | 6 |
| Can someone, with out violating their non-disclosure agreement, let us
know if kickstart 1.4 will be available for the 1000? I don't have
a $1000 to upgrade at this time, but I would like to at least upgrade
to 1.4. I do realize and expect that I would not have a full
functionality of 1.4 with the 1000 and the old chip set.
|
3429.43 | I sure hope so... | FROCKY::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Fri Feb 16 1990 12:05 | 15 |
| Re: .42
Nah, but simply because I don't know. But I'm pretty certain that
CBM will not drop support for A1000 with 1.4.
A 512K machine might not functional...
And you can always count on some vivid 3rd party developer to come
out with a Kickstart ROM adapter for the A1000...
As far as 1.4x or 1.5 are concerned, your guess is as good as mine,
but at some point in time you'll have to part with your A1000 or
stay behind in the OS development.
Regards,
<CB>
|
3429.44 | let's be nicer | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Fri Feb 16 1990 12:41 | 7 |
| re: .42
It isn't really fair to ask people to "come close" to violating their
non-disclosure agreements. I suggest that those of us who want to know
refrain from asking leading questions out of politeness until the
information is released generally.
John Sauter
|
3429.45 | The tempted and the tempters... | ULTRA::BURGESS | Abject oriented poverty | Fri Feb 16 1990 12:59 | 23 |
| re <<< Note 3429.44 by SAUTER::SAUTER "John Sauter" >>>
> -< let's be nicer >-
> re: .42
> It isn't really fair to ask people to "come close" to violating their
> non-disclosure agreements. I suggest that those of us who want to know
> refrain from asking leading questions out of politeness until the
> information is released generally.
> John Sauter
Well, yes - but.
Lets ALL be nicer in this regard ? how about,
"If you have signed a NDA (with anyone) please don't publicise that fact here"
It "isn't really fair" to say, "I gotta secret" and NOT
expect people to enquire a little.
R
|
3429.46 | Apology | ACESMK::SNIDER | | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:17 | 13 |
|
I apologize for .42, I did not know what type of information could or
could not be asked, that is why I specificly asked that the NDA was NOT
to be violated. I do realize the importance in NOT divulging specific
information of any type of classification.
Once again, I apologize if this came to close.
Pete Snider
P.S. I'm very glad that the ones who have been lucky to see it have
been impressed.
|
3429.47 | | ENOVAX::BARRETT | Of Optical Mice and Men... | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:47 | 13 |
| I personally like the fact that it has been stated by some that they
have an NDA. It shows me that there is a serious level on interest with
some DEC employees, and it helps provide a source of reliable
information when things can be stated. NDA's, by CBM or DEC, are never
intended as an "I'm better than you" tease. If it really bothers you,
register yourself as a real Amiga developer and get one yourself (no
I'm not being sarcastic). It is very obvious that <CB> has been a major
contributor to this notesboard. I don't deny him his excitement at
learning new things from CBM before others.
Keith
(who does not have one by the way)
|
3429.48 | So, who's violated what? | KALI::PLOUFF | It came from the... dessert! | Sat Feb 17 1990 21:10 | 25 |
| Why in the world should Pete Snider apologize?
John Sauter writes:
> It isn't really fair to ask people to "come close" to violating their
> non-disclosure agreements. I suggest that those of us who want to know
> refrain from asking leading questions out of politeness until the
> information is released generally.
_Of course_ we will ask leading questions! That's how the
non-disclosure game is played. And, of course, Christian Balzer or
whoever else will say "Sorry, I'm not at liberty," or just not answer
the question, when he feels uncomfortable. It's all a little like
flirtation -- both sides enjoy it even though nothing of consequence
happens.
Seems to me that we, Digital, train salespeople in just the techniques
that CB is showing in his answers. CB has also contributed some small
bit of first-hand observation to the topic thread, compared to the
rampant speculation of other replies. He has also, if you read his
recent contributions closely, told us _nothing_ about future products.
BTW, I read Pete's question as specifically _not_ asking CB to cross
the line. Mr. Sauter, loosen your surcingle a bit.
Wes Plouff
|
3429.49 | Easy... | FROCKY::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Mon Feb 19 1990 06:58 | 13 |
| Re: .44-.48
Huh, no need to get all excited here, fellas. ;-)
I can relate to both .44 and .45, but hey, I'm supposed to be grown
up by now and will handle touchy questions at my discretion. And
it was well known that I'm a commercial developer before the Paris
DevCon.
All in all (not one ;-), relax everybody. This is _NOT_ UseNet or
SoapBox... ;-)
Regards,
<CB>
|
3429.50 | | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Mon Feb 19 1990 07:59 | 24 |
| I don't think of non-disclosure agreements as opportunities for
flirtation. When I attend DECUS there are always things I can't
talk about. When a customer asks me a question about such a thing
I always say ``Sorry, I can't talk about unannounced products.''
In my experience, the customer always changes the subject upon
hearing that response. I consider changing the subject (and not
returning to it) the polite thing to do.
Does Digital train salespeople in flirtation? I don't know, having
never been a Digital salesperson. However, I once talked to an IBM
salesperson who wanted very badly to tell us something he wasn't
supposed to talk about. He managed to get the information across
by using leading remarks and confirming correct guesses. It was fun
at the time, but thinking about it afterwards I realized it was wrong
of us to participate in his "game". If companies like Digital and
CBM are going to be willing to reveal important information under
non-disclosure to those who need it in advance of public announcement,
they have to feel that the non-disclosure agreements are being kept.
Even an appearance of carelessness with the information can lead to
its decreased use, to the detriment of those who need it.
What's a `surcingle'? If it's a kind of necktie, I'm not wearing one,
appearances to the contrary notwithstanding.
John Sauter
|
3429.51 | | KALI::PLOUFF | It came from the... dessert! | Mon Feb 19 1990 09:14 | 5 |
| 'Surcingle' has a meaning from medieval times. A surcingle was the
belt used to fasten a king's -- or wizard's -- robe. Now my gentle
intent should be pellucid, no? :-)
Wes
|
3429.52 | To get the subject back on track... | PAMSRC::BARRETT | Of Optical Mice and Men... | Mon Feb 19 1990 17:24 | 3 |
| I've discovered that there a at least a few dealers that are leting
people "buy" back their A1000 system (sans keyboard) for a few hundred
dollars.
|
3429.53 | | TALLIS::MCAFEE | Steve McAfee | Mon Feb 19 1990 18:11 | 14 |
| Usenetters have mentioned that there are places which will take the
keyboard only and give you the discount. No money paid for the A1000
at all. I'd suggest calling around and asking various places if they
are willing to do this.
If the dealer takes your machine he gets to keep it sort of as a bonus
at your expense. Commodore does not want it and I don't think they
have stipulated that the dealer must take it away for scrap so I'd
try to keep it if I still had one. After all you can always get a new
A2000 keyboard. If nothing else you can probably take out the floppy
and put into your new A2000. Plus you'll have a set of spare 8520's
etc...
-steve
|
3429.54 | | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Mon Mar 12 1990 19:02 | 8 |
| I deleted the .14 reply I posted. Turns out the instructions for
connecting a A2000 keyboard to an A1000 were NOT correct according to
other information on usenet. It is possible to do this correctly, and
other postings gave more precise directions. If anybody is interested
I'll post it here.
sorry 'bout that,
dennis
|
3429.55 | Please do! | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | Don't have a cow, Dad! | Tue Mar 13 1990 00:22 | 0 |
3429.56 | | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Wed Mar 14 1990 17:06 | 10 |
| re .55:
Interesting timing. I just finished building a working cable at 1:30am
this morning by copying wire for wire an existing working cable.
(After all the usenet talk of smoking your keyboard, this seemed the
safest route to go). It seems to work - I tried it for about a half
hour last nite. I want to do a bit more testing with it to be sure
before posting.
dennis
|
3429.57 | $1K + keyboard = A2000? | REGENT::VAILLETTE | | Mon Mar 19 1990 17:44 | 26 |
|
Well that March 31 deadline for the A1000-->A2000 upgrade is
fast approaching. Has anyone found a dealer in New England
that will sell us an A2000 for $999 plus an A1000 Keyboard?
I checked with System Eyes and the Memory Location. One of
them want's the A1000 box and the other will sell back the
A1000 box for $200.
For me, finding or not finding "the deal" will probably determine
if I upgrade or not. I have a hard time justifying the $999 for
the A2000 plus $150? (for a new SCSI controller) plus $150? (to get
me back up to 2MB) all so I can run 1.4, run future software, and
have an upgrade path to a 68030 or 68040 (for another $2-3K).
But, since I am a sucker for a good deal, somehow I can justify
it if I end up with an A2000 and my old A1000 system box. In such
case I could use the A1000 for dedicated real-time applications
like a heart rate monitor during exercise or a telescope movement
controller, or whatever. (well I least I can tell myself I'll
use it for such constructive purposes.)
Thanks for any pointers to dealers that will accept $999 plus an
A1000 keyboard for an A2000 (or any other good deals).
Gary
|
3429.58 | Keep those donations coming | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | Using jellybeans as projectiles | Tue Mar 20 1990 01:51 | 39 |
|
Thanks to Gary, for entering that last reply on my behalf (how'd he
read my mind, I mean, like, word for word, and with all them cobwebs up
there), but I must come clean. After all, the first step to overcoming
cheapskater's syndrome is admission...
> But, since I am a sucker for a good deal, somehow I can justify
> it if I end up with an A2000 and my old A1000 system box.
What I can't figure is, Commodore's offering something like $350 bucks
to the dealers (or maybe $350 off the cost of an A2XXX) for the
keyboard, but some dealers would rather resell the complete A1K's for
more money instead. This makes good profit margin sense, I suppose, but
doesn't this kinda defeat the whole purpose of the upgrade offer for
Commodore? If they really want to bury the A1000, shouldn't they be
saying "Give us the whole A1000, or else!".
I don't want to miss out on the future possibilities that the A2000
offers, but I hate to give up a great machine, especially when there's
still some hope ala Rejuvenator, et al.
One more consideration (maybe paranoia would be a better word) is the
hardware revision of the A2K box. Will dealers be "unloading" their
in-stock rev 4.x motherboards to the upgrade folks? How much wheeling
and dealing clout will I have with an upgrade versus a "regular" sale?
Dare I ask for a rev 6.x motherboard, fatter aggie box with say a NEC
floppy in place of the stock Chinon? Will they tell me to go elsewhere
or perhaps pound silica into an orifice?
Making this all gel by the end of March is going to be tricky. I really
cannot afford nor justify this upgrade at the moment, but it's always
tough for a cheapskate to pass up a deal. Maybe I should just wait and
see what falls through the cracks, but I fear that by the time I can
"afford" it I'll be buying someones used A2000 'cause they're buying a
newly announced A3000 8^(.
Gimme some flack, please!
Pete
|
3429.59 | Any discarded A1000's out there? | 19366::BARRETT | Of Optical Mice and Men... | Tue Mar 20 1990 10:28 | 7 |
| I'm looking to pick up one of these keyboardless A1000 systems somehow.
If anyone considering this tradeup does not have the intention of
keeping the base unit, please send me EMAIL. I might be willing to pay
the $100-$200 "buyback" fee to keep the unit. As I said earlier, a
Connecticut dealer was allowing people to keep them. If this is still true,
then a second possibility is that someone will perform the tradeup there
and I could get the unit and I'll pay the original owner a small fee?
|
3429.60 | Software Shop (Worcester) needs only keyboard + $999 | BOLTON::PLOUFF | It came from the... dessert! | Tue Mar 20 1990 12:21 | 0 |
3429.61 | Hard to find a old rev board? | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Tue Mar 20 1990 17:30 | 36 |
| Re: .58
> One more consideration (maybe paranoia would be a better word) is the
> hardware revision of the A2K box.
Whatever the dealer has on his shelves.
> Will dealers be "unloading" their in-stock rev 4.x motherboards to
> the upgrade folks?
Probably not. Most of the dealers I know keep only a small number of
2000s in their inventory. Turn over keeps the stock "fresh": you would
probably have a hard time finding a dealer selling machines without
the 1 Meg Agnus.
> How much wheeling and dealing clout will I have with an upgrade
> versus a "regular" sale? Dare I ask for a rev 6.x motherboard,
> fatter aggie box with say a NEC floppy in place of the stock
> Chinon?
Probably no problem getting a late rev board and a 1 meg Agnus
since that is probably what you would get anyway. Don't know
about the floppy...
Hey, call up a dealer and ask. What can it hurt?
The only bit of paranoia I'd have is for people upgrading to a
2000HD. Make sure that the disk controller is the 2091. I think
that the 2000HD based on the 2091 is still young enough that you
might be able to find a dealer selling machines equipped with
2090As. The 2091 works better than the 2090(A), and also gives
you sockets for another two meg of memory.
Folks upgrading to a 2500/30 are probably safe. That configuration
is to new to be anything but the latest stuff.
|
3429.62 | Software Shop | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Tue Mar 20 1990 18:06 | 13 |
| re back a couple:
I was in the same situation - A1000 with HD and memory.
Seemed like alot of money to just get the same level of functionality
I have in my A1000 plus a few bells and whistles I didn't have an
immediate need for.
The Software Shop (Worcester, Mass.) wanted the A1000 keyboard, keyboard
cable, and the A1000 serial number + upgrade price in the Commodore ads.
I left with a 3 meg A2000HD and a CLtd keyboard (from store demo A1000)
regards,
dennis
|
3429.63 | | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Tue Mar 20 1990 18:18 | 7 |
| re .61:
The system described in .62 came with a rev 6.2 motherboard, 1meg
Agnus, 2091 with Quantum 40mb drive on the card, and a floppy drive
that doesn't have a dust door, and clicks (just like the A1000 df0:).
dennis
|
3429.64 | Offer Extended until the end of April | ISE003::MARI | Lee Mari | Wed Mar 28 1990 18:40 | 10 |
| I just spoke to Steve at System Eyes and the offer is being extended until the
end of April. I didn't think to ask if he was extending it or commodore was
extending it.
System Eyes is asking for the keyboard, the 1000, the original documentation,
kickstart disk, workbench disk, mouse, cables,... in the original box. No
deal at all for just a keyboard.
In turn, System Eyes is selling the above mentioned systems for 350$. There
were 4-5 of them on the floor yesterday.
|
3429.65 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Wed Mar 28 1990 19:26 | 4 |
|
Does the $350 A1000 come with an A1000 keyboard?
-Dave
|
3429.66 | A Bedtime Story | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | Who Plugged Mortimer Mouse? | Thu Mar 29 1990 00:11 | 97 |
| Re: .65
� Does the $350 A1000 come with an A1000 keyboard?
I *believe* so; They turn around and sell them instead of getting the
rebate from Commodore. By rights, you could buy the 1000, turn in the
keyboard to a dealer who'll accept such, and get the upgrade (probably
not too cost effective).
Re: to anyone silly enough to listen to me
I took Randy's suggestion and called around. But first I ruled out The
Software Shop and The Memory Location (both in Massachusetts) only
because they seemed farther away than I really want to travel (I'm in
E.Derry, NH don't you know) and if I had any problems...
I called C='s 1-800 number they had listed in the ad. They gave me the
phone numbers for System Eyes, Omni Tech, and Video Lab as the
authorized dealers in my area.
I called System Eyes first (having dealt with them before):
A2000HD (A2091/Quantum 40Mg/Fatter Agnus) = $1599.00 and *complete* A1000
*But* Steve said he only had one A2000HD in stock. I said, "Well, what
if I get there before Saturday and it's sold?"
"I don't know; I'll have to call Commodore."
"Oh. Okay, if I call you back later in the week, will you know?"
"I don't know; I'll have to call Commodore."
That was enlightening...
Next I tried Video Lab (route 102 in Hudson, NH). They are an
authorized dealer, but they sell mostly turn-key configurations to
cable TV stations and the like. They get their stuff from System Eyes.
No luck there, but I'd like to stop by just to play with their stuff!
The Commodore operator gave me the number for Omni Tech in Salem, NH
(now defunct) so I called the Tewskbury store and spoke with the owner,
Dick Synder (sp?).
A2000HD (A2091/Quantum 40Mg/Fatter Agnus) = $1499.00 and A1000 box/keyboard
I asked him about the Salem store; tactfully trying to avoid 5% Mass
Sales Tax. The tax would come to about $75 but he said he could ship to
me in NH for about $20. Then he mentioned that he thought that the deal
had been extended till the end of April. I asked him to confirm this;
he shuffled some papers and said he'd have to call me back.
While I waited, I called back C='s 1-800 number and grilled the poor
operator for info on the April extension. She read me the sale ad
practically word for word and then offered up C='s Customer Service
Center phone number. I played the "all lines are busy" recording for
about 15 minutes before giving up. I headed off to work, gloomily.
Now mind you, what prompted this spurious dialing frenzy was not
Randy's advise entirely (sorry Mr. Meyers ;^). For some reason, the
Wife was egging me on to buy an A2000*HD* with money that we don't own!
I figure she finally got tired of looking at the mass of cables, fans,
and expansion box clashing with her living room. She asked if the
equivalent mess would fit inside the A2000HD. I answered positively,
before she could even finish speaking...
Anyways, while at work, the old lady calls and said Omni Tech called
back (surprise, surprise!). I called him back and he said that his C=
rep had confirmed the extension. Then I asked him *exactly* what he
required out of the A1000 and if it mattered if it's serial number had
already been used in one of the past upgrades. He said that all he
really had to send to C= for the rebate was the keyboard and the serial
number of the system box and that it didn't matter about the serial
number being used before; they weren't tracking them (at least one of
my A1000's had been bought back from the dealer after being turned in
for one of the past upgrade deals). I asked if I could just turn in the
keyboard and keep the system box and he said O.K.!
Well, to make a long story even longer and more pointless, I'll be
heading down there tomorrow to see what kind of trouble I can cause.
Stay tuned for part II: Petey takes his car, business, and chances out
of state.
Petey
P.s. I didn't ask about the motherboard revs; since they had the
A2091's in them, I'm assuming they're fairly new.
P.p.s. (Oh gad, shut up already...) I hate to not support the "local"
store (not really local, System Eyes is kinda 20-30 miles away), but
being a cheapskate, I have to go where prices are lower and the service
seems friendlier.
As always, the viewpoints expressed above are entirely from my own
twisted little mind and in no way shape or form reflect the opinions of
my employer, except by co-inc-i-dink.
|
3429.67 | Upgraded at Omni Tech | DAZED::GIUFFRIDA | | Thu Mar 29 1990 10:20 | 9 |
|
I also did the upgrade through Omni Tech. They are $100 under the
advertised upgrade price and also gave me a reasonable trade-in value
for a A1000 1 meg. memory exapnsion board. Too bad there aren't
in Salem N.H. anymore. I used to frequent the store quite often
since I only lived 5 miles away.
Joe Giuffrida
|
3429.68 | | NSSG::SULLIVAN | Steven E. Sullivan | Thu Mar 29 1990 11:04 | 11 |
| I spoke to Moe at the Software Shop recently and he corrobated the extension
of the 1000 to 2000 trade in deal; until the end of April.
This is quite consistent with what Commodore has done in the past on trade-in
deals. I seem to recall them all being extended.
A dark note that could be implied by this is the much rumored mid-April
announcements may be delayed. I hope not since with the Apple Mac Fx
announcement it has been shown that time *is* money in this business!
-SES
|
3429.69 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Thu Mar 29 1990 12:24 | 12 |
|
strange... I thought CBM was trying to remove the A1000s from the
market thru this program. Looks like most of the dealers in the
Boston and N.H. now have some sort of scheme where you get to keep
your A1000. And CBM is extending that program??
Maybe CBM found out you can sell a lot of A2xxx systems at a time
when sales should be dropping off due to the anticipation of new
models. Probably helps a bit with dealer loyalty too - that trade-in
program gets people into the stores to spend at least $999.
-Dave
|
3429.70 | Might be 1000s with 2000 keyboards | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Thu Mar 29 1990 14:40 | 13 |
| When I talked to one of the Steves at System Eyes, I got the idea
that he was selling 1000 with 2000 keyboards. He had the theory
that Commodore was trying to do away with the 1000, and that in
the future if a 1000 owner with a 2000 keyboard complained about
1000 support being dropped, Commodore would reply with, "Look,
you are running on a system that was turned in on an upgrade.
We did take care of the original 1000 owners. We've met any
obligations we had."
I also remember being in the store when a big box arrived, and
he said, "Hey, that might be the 2000 keyboards I have on order!"
If someone is interested, they should check.
|
3429.71 | 2000 keyboard | SALEM::LEIMBERGER | | Fri Mar 30 1990 05:07 | 2 |
| re -1 that is a 2000 keyboard with cable adapter.
bill
|
3429.72 | A500 - A2000 upgrade offer (UK) | AYOV28::ATHOMSON | C'mon, git aff! /The Kelty Clippie | Mon Apr 02 1990 05:20 | 25 |
| Well, I got a surprise letter from Commodore (UK) on Saturday. I forgot
to bring it into work with me so the following is from memory...
SPECIAL OFFER - UPGRADE YOUR A1000 or A500 TO AN A2000
^^^^
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Mr Thomson,
Due to popular demand etc. etc.
Just take your A1000 or A500 including power supply and mouse to
your nearest dealer, to take advantage of this offer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, I can't remember much more about the letter, but the upshot of
the deal is you give them �1099 plus your A500/A1000 and recieve in
return a A2000/U (Which is a A2000 plus a A2091 and 40 Meg hard drive)
There are also a whole heap of peripherals at special prices too. The
deal is only valid for the month of April.
I'll bring the stuff in with me tomorrow and type in the prices.
The interesting thing is that they're accepting A500s as tradeins....
Alan T.
|
3429.73 | Unsupported? | DNEAST::BAKER_CHUCK | Human Input Required... | Mon Apr 02 1990 08:24 | 6 |
|
Gee; I hope that doesn't mean that CBM will be dropping A500 support.
Chuck
|
3429.74 | doubt 500 support will go away | CRISTA::LEIMBERGER | I have my marbles now I want yours | Mon Apr 02 1990 11:21 | 14 |
| re -1
>> Gee; I hope that doesn't mean that CBM will be dropping A500 support.
I heard talk about a mass marketed 500,and that it would be different from
the current model.(could explain why we are seeing sale prices on the 500)
The person told me that the guy from CBM was very careful not to devulge
any information beyound this.I had not heard anything about a 500 tradeup
however.What I heard could be labeled rumor but if someone recieves a mailer
then you cannot dismiss this. I don't think that CBM is in a posistion to
drop support for the 500 taking into account there is ram,and HD already
available for the system.However the student program,and the special
applications promotions do center on the 2000,and they seem to be selling
quite well.
bill
|
3429.75 | This sounds like a UK Commodore Plan for 500 trade in. | BUZZER::GERBER | For more info, call: 800/555-1212 | Mon Apr 02 1990 12:07 | 8 |
| Re .72: This sounds like a plan for Commodore (UK) to drum up more business.
they can use the parts from the old 500 for repair parts or let the
dealers sell used systems to allow cheap entry to the amiga market.
In any case a while ago commodore US had a trade up plan from almost
any CMBM machine to a 500/2000 depending on what you started with.
-----Robert
|
3429.76 | | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Mon Apr 02 1990 14:38 | 9 |
| Just an fyi for you new 2000 owners - The Memory Location is selling
6' keyboard extender cables ($4.50+tax) that work fine for sitting in
a lounger with the keyboard in your lap. I used to be able to do
this with an A1000 keyboard, but the A2000's keyboard cable was too
short.
regards,
dennis
|
3429.77 | A rumor on why the trade-up... | COOKIE::WITHERS | It's Water, but it's COLD! | Mon Apr 09 1990 17:44 | 20 |
| My [t]rusty old A1000 got hit by lightning (sniff!) so I took it into Paragon
here in Colorado Springs for a repair esitmate. While there, Pete (the owner)
said that I might consider the trade-up because of what he called "Version 2"
of the software. According to Pete, Version 2 would be out "within 60 days"
and would not support the A1000 because V2 has a 512K Kickstart and there
was no way to cram it into the 256K Kickstar ram in the 1000. According
to Pete, the three options if one wanted "Version 2" were:
- Trade-up to a 1 Meg 2000 (presumably, a 1 meg 500 would work too)
- Instal one of the aftermarket boards that had the enhanced PALs and
Kickstart in ROM. Pete was not sure if this would be sufficient
to support the Version 2 ROMS
- Stay at 1.3 forever.
Pete's hypothesis was that, when A1000 owners complained that "Version 2"
didn't run, Commodore would say, "But we GAVE you the chance to upgrade".
Has anyone else in AMIGA Netland heard of such a thing?
Thanks,
BobW
|
3429.78 | Next version =1.4 not 2.0 | BUZZER::GERBER | For more info, call: 800/555-1212 | Mon Apr 09 1990 18:30 | 15 |
| Re: .77
1) The last I heard the next version of AmigaDOS is 1.4
2) It looks like it is 512K. It may not run on A1000's or it may
use non kickstart ram for some of the os. (I do not know what the
story is here.)
3) You won't be able to use any of the new chipset based features
without an aftermarket board in the A1000. (Some of these boards
have been designed so they can take whatever ROM's the 500/2000
can take.)
4) Depending on how much the repair is and how much extra equipment
you have, you may be better off trading the machine in. Commodore
only wants the keyboard. They never said the machine has to work!
-----Robert
|
3429.79 | See AmigaWorld.. | LEDS::ACCIARDI | Larger than life, and twice as ugly | Mon Apr 09 1990 23:30 | 11 |
|
The latest issue of AmigaWorld indeed mentioned that 1.4 (or 2.0) would
grow to 512K.
Any A1000 owners may want to pick up this issue, since there is a good
article by Sheldon Leemon on whether or not you should retire your
A1000. Leemon indicated that 1.4 (or 2.0) would run on an A1000, but
you'd loose an additional 256K of user memory to the kernal. This
would leave you with a completely useless 256K of chip ram. Blecchhhh.
Ed.
|
3429.80 | | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Mon Apr 09 1990 23:36 | 5 |
| re .79:
And if you had more than 512K memory? Say 2.5Mb?
dennis
|
3429.81 | Petey's Big Adventure | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | Suffering from Bruin's Ulcer | Tue Apr 10 1990 00:11 | 33 |
| Warning: Dribble Zone Ahead. Next Useen now before it's too late!
Now, for all you waiting on the edge of your seats;
I've taken the plunge and now own an A2000HD. I ended up at OmniTek
(apologies for the previous spellings) with A1000 keyboard in hand and
serial number from the box. OmniTek sells Amiga's and clones, but while
I was there, most of the activity was in the relatively small Amiga
room. They don't have a huge software collection, but it's not bad
either and the prices are something like 25-35% off the list. I opted
to save the ~$55 difference in Ma$$ tax and had it shipped UPS
($1499.00 + $20.00 shipping). I wasn't too thrilled about having it
shipped (all I could picture was my poor machine being tossed around by
sleepy high school/college students) but luckily, everything seems to
have arrived unscathed. Of course, I've already spent most of the
"extra" cash ($45.00 for Quarterback).
Just for the record, it's got an A2091, Quantum 40Mb, 1 Mb FANG, and a
rev 6.2 motherboard. However, all of the documentation I got refers to
the A2090/A2090a. The hard drive came with WB and Extras already
installed in one 40Mb partition (the only one). Luckily, the A2091
installation software is easy to follow, so re-partitioning was pretty
painless.
So far I'm very pleased, but I can't seem to fit this keyboard under
the system box...
Pete
As always, the viewpoints expressed above are entirely from my own
twisted little mind and in no way shape or form reflect the opinions of
my employer, except by co-inc-i-dink.
|
3429.82 | FYI on 2091 | NSSG::SULLIVAN | Steven E. Sullivan | Tue Apr 10 1990 00:28 | 22 |
| RE: <<< Note 3429.81 by CRISTA::CAPRICCIO "Suffering from Bruin's Ulcer" >>>
> However, all of the documentation I got refers to the
> A2090/A2090a. The hard drive came with WB and Extras already
> installed in one 40Mb partition (the only one). Luckily, the
> A2091 installation software is easy to follow, so re-partitioning
> was pretty painless.
You should be aware of the options jumpers on the 2091. It has two of
general significance. The jumper block I am refering to is (I seem
to recall) labeled J5. It is to the right and below the memory config
jumpers as you look at the component side of the card with the card
edge down. The top Jumper controls if the driver scans the SCSI bus
for LUNs greater than zero. The default (open) is no. The one below
disables parity checking for the SCSI bus (necessary for Adaptec and
some older SCSI devices). It also controls the SCSI timeout delay.
The default setting (open) has parity enabled and normal SCSI
timeouts. When closed Parity is Ignored and timeouts are about 2
seconds. Thus, with the second options jumper shorted scanning the
SCSI bus can take between 2 and three minutes.
-SES
|
3429.83 | Thanks. Any specs on DRAM's for it? | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | Petey-Pie | Wed Apr 11 1990 02:56 | 12 |
| Re: -.1
Thanks for the info. I gave a call to Dick at OmniTek and he said if he
could find an extra manual, he'd send it to me. I'm not sure why
Commodore shipped it with the old docs; the box had all kinds of
stickers and stuff on it denoting it had an A2091, etc. Anyone else end
up with no A2091 manual? I'll try to get Commodore to send me one if I
can get through on the CSC phone line.
Thanks again,
Pete
|
3429.84 | 256K by 4, CMOS | BOMBE::MOORE | Eat or be eaten | Wed Apr 11 1990 03:08 | 3 |
| Having recently populated my nephew's A2091, I can tell you that the
RAM chips must be CMOS type, 256Kx4. We got 16 of 'em (2MB) from the
place in Oklahoma for about $165 last month.
|
3429.85 | | ULTRA::KINDEL | Bill Kindel @ BXB1 | Wed Apr 11 1990 14:26 | 5 |
| Re .84:
FYI, the A590 takes the same 100/120ns CMOS 256Kx4 DRAM chips (a
usually-reliable source tells me that 80ns is too fast). If you're
impatient, I've found them locally for about $14 each.
|
3429.86 | | NSSG::SULLIVAN | Steven E. Sullivan | Wed Apr 11 1990 14:34 | 7 |
| There is a great deal of similarity between the A590 and the A2091.
For instance, has anyone noticed the place on the 2091 PCB for a XT style
disk controller?? Hummmmm..... Wonder if only a few parts would be needed;
Naaaaaaaa, who'd want a XT disk in their A2000 anyway!
-SES
|
3429.87 | no 2091 docs here either | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Wed Apr 11 1990 19:01 | 18 |
| re .83:
Same here. The manual included with the A2091 was for a A2090A.
It made for lots of interesting reading, especially since it was
radically physically different from the board in front of me.
Fortunately, the harddisk was formated with Workbench 1.3.2
already installed. The fun part was in trying to install the A2091
into an A2000 (they were out of A2000HD systems) without any useful
documentation. Anybody know why there is a molex power connector on
the A2091 board? I had to connect directly to the drive 40Mb Quantum
before it would spin up. Also had to guess which way to plug the HD
light cable on. Is now up and running, but it was worth some crossed
fingers as I applied power.
Let us know what Commodore says, I'm interested in getting docs for
my 2091 too. For example, how to hook up a second SCSI drive.
thanks,
dennis
|
3429.88 | Some bright light, a little toner,... | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | Fatal Attraction to Hardware | Thu Apr 12 1990 04:14 | 34 |
| Re: .84,.85
Thanks. Regarding the "80nS too fast"; I wouldn't think this would be a
factor. If you were trying to use ones rated for, say, 150nS and the
spec is 120nS, then you'd be taking a chance. I think as long as the
DRAM's cough up their data (and it's stable) within the valid address
"window", you're okay (besides, faster is always betta', right? ;^)
Anyone want to "trade" 2 Mb worth of 256Kx4's for the equivelant in
1024Kx1's. I bought them for $144.00 (Another Tom Senna cheapskater's
special).
Re: .87
Sorry you're in the same stew, but I'm glad to hear I'm not alone.
Being the incredibly patient person I are, I went back to OmniTek to
bug Dick about it. He offered me a photocopy and I accepted knowing
well that it is copyrighted, but heck, I *paid* for the thing and it
should have come with the system. I'm still going to call C= and get
the "official" document, and hopefully an explanation why it wasn't
there in the first place.
� Anybody know why there is a molex power connector on
� the A2091 board? I had to connect directly to the drive 40Mb Quantum
� before it would spin up. Also had to guess which way to plug the HD
I haven't read through the whole thing yet, but I think the power
connector is there so you don't have to run a long cable when you mount
the drive on the A2091 card itself. I think it draws power right from
the 100 pin connectors when connected this way. Mine came mounted in
the left-most 3�" drive bay. If you're interested, I'll send you a copy
until C= comes through. Can I be arrested for such behaviour? Am I
becoming a pirate?
Pete
|
3429.89 | 80nS chips work ok for me | KETJE::VLASIU | | Thu Apr 12 1990 06:13 | 10 |
| I use 80nS chips (2MB) in my A590 and it works ok. It's really another
life with an A500/A590 with a total of 3MB. In the future I'll try
maybe to upgrade with an accelerator but there is no emergency. For the
memory it was, as now I can use normally Cambridge Lisp and SBProlog. I
use also 200 buffers for the HD and plenty of resident commands, so the
HD is less used. I will not trade my A500 for an A2000 because I can
only loose at this moment. When some A3000 will be there maybe I'll
think again.
Sorin
|
3429.90 | thanks | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Thu Apr 12 1990 19:48 | 17 |
| re .88:
Yes, I'm very interested. thanks, I'll send you mail.
The Quantum drive is mounted on the 2091 card. It doesn't spin up with
power coming from either the pins or when I plug the cable from the
power supply to the connecter labelled 'drive power' on the 2091.
Only by bending some compacitors out of the way was I able to plug it
into the power connector on the drive itself and then the drive spins
up and autoboots. I was just puzzled why they would go thru the
trouble of putting an unused power connector on the 2091.
My 2000HD was a 2000 and a 2091 with 40mb HD in a seperate cardboard box
clearly labelled as a 2091. (they were sold out of 2000HD)
thanks,
dennis
|
3429.91 | Not worthless connector! | NSSG::SULLIVAN | Steven E. Sullivan | Fri Apr 13 1990 01:26 | 13 |
| re .90:
> I was just puzzled why they would go thru the trouble of putting
> an unused power connector on the 2091.
The connector on the 2091 is intended to supply power TO the
drive plug you had to bend the capacitors out of the way to get at...
So if you have a bunch of cards, maybe 2 2091 hard cards, getting
power to the drive is simple - a small cable (not included
apparently) that goes from the connector on the 2091 to the drive
power connector.
-SES
|
3429.92 | | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Fri Apr 13 1990 18:46 | 7 |
| There really is that kind of power available from the card slots?
Amazing. Is this a A2091 'unique' cable or is this sort of thing
available from other sources?
thanks,
dennis
|
3429.93 | Card Power Limits | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Fri Apr 13 1990 20:21 | 26 |
| Re: .92
> There really is that kind of power available from the card slots?
Yes and no. One of the good reasons to have a A2091 manual is that
it contains a warning not to exceed some power limit if you
power the hard disk directly from the card.
Since hard drives almost always come without any documentation (you
have to find out the phone number of the manufacturer and call them
if you want specs!), knowing the electrical requirements of your
drive can be tricky.
When Commodore sells a A2091 as part of a 2000HD, they mount the
drive in a floppy bay and power the drive off of the drive power
supply cables. I wonder if it is because they know something
we don't, or if it is because it is easier for them to install
that way, or if the drive is safer in shipping in the floppy bay.
Personally, I put my drive in the floppy bay not because I was
worried about power, but because drives are heavy, and disk
controller boards look flimsy. Or at least my old Pacific
Peripherals controller card looked flimsy. The A2091 seems
more durable. If you get the A2091 as part of a 2000HD so that
it has the optional reinforcement bar and foam pad, it might
even be more secure than a floppy bay!
|
3429.94 | | NSSG::SULLIVAN | Steven E. Sullivan | Fri Apr 13 1990 23:29 | 12 |
| RE:.93
> Since hard drives almost always come without any documentation...
Well, I pretty much agree with this. A pretty poor practice, if
you ask me! But, most all the drives I have come across DO have their
power requirements printed on the drives. It may not be very detailed
and only listed as a total watts figure, but it has been there on
every drive I can recall coming across. As for other information,
well I agree completely.
���
-SES
|
3429.95 | Don't tip that drive or the data will slide off! | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | My face is on fire | Sat Apr 14 1990 00:11 | 51 |
| >> There really is that kind of power available from the card slots?
>Yes and no. One of the good reasons to have a A2091 manual is that
>it contains a warning not to exceed some power limit if you
>power the hard disk directly from the card.
Quite correct (as usual). In fact, you may have multiple A2091's
installed, but only one card-mounted 3.5" drive, lest you may kiss
your warranty good-bye. For those of us that get off on this
stuff, the spec is:
+5V @ 1A, +12V @ 1A continuous, 2A maximum startup.
>When Commodore sells a A2091 as part of a 2000HD, they mount the
>drive in a floppy bay and power the drive off of the drive power
>supply cables. I wonder if it is because they know something
>we don't, or if it is because it is easier for them to install
>that way, or if the drive is safer in shipping in the floppy bay.
The manual instructs you to use the shock mounts when mounting the
drive in a drive bay, but *not* to use them when mounting it on
the card frame; using instead the screws and nuts on the card.
What gives? One thing I've always wondered: is the drive
orientation a factor in the life of the drive? It would seem to me
that having the drive mounted horizontally (with respect to the
platters) would be the more desirable position. My brain (small as
it may be) says that gravity would be distibuted evenly across the
platters, versus mounting it vertically on a card (the analogy of
the "straight" piston engine vs. the pancake variety). Also,
wouldn't any lubricant tend to settle towards the lowest point
when the drive is spun down? It's nothing to get worked up over,
but I was just curious, since it seems nowadays more and more
drives are mounted vertically (ie RF's in BA21n boxes).
>more durable. If you get the A2091 as part of a 2000HD so that
>it has the optional reinforcement bar and foam pad, it might
>even be more secure than a floppy bay!
What I can't figure is (glancing at the pseudo-docs) is if you buy
an A2091, you get a short power cable and short 50 pin SCSI cable,
which implies you would have to mount your drive on the card,
unless you supply a longer SCSI cable at minimum (power cable is
there, as long as you don't have additional floppies). But if you
buy the A2091-40 (controller + 40Mb drive), you get the long SCSI
cable, reinforcement bar, foam pad and mounting hardware (where
the mounting hardware {threaded shock mounts w/nuts and washers,
or as they say in the mid-west, warshers} is specific to mounting
the drive in a drive bay, not on the card). Mine's mounted in a
drive bay *and* has the bar and pad. Go figure!
Pete (not whining again, am I?)
|
3429.96 | thanks | NAC::BRANNON | value added | Tue Apr 17 1990 20:58 | 12 |
| Sounds like I should leave the A2091 hardcard as is. Drive orientation
doesn't seem to matter to the PC drives in at work and its less risk
powering the drive directly from the power supply.
I just used up the second 3.5" bay installing a second floppy drive
I picked up at the last computer flea market.
Thanks for all the advice.
regards,
dennis
|
3429.97 | Missing A2091 Manuals | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | Omega Sector,Water World Type G | Thu Apr 19 1990 23:45 | 19 |
|
Re: - the mysterious missing A2091 manuals;
I (well actually, my wife�) finally got through to Commodore. Here's
the scoop, they ran out of A2091 manuals, so they sent the old ones
instead (ya, right). To get an "official" copy, send a photocopy of
your A2000HD or A2091(-40) receipt along with a note specifying that
you didn't receive an A2091 manual, and return address, to:
Commodore Business Machines
Dept. C
1200 Wilson Drive
West Chester, PA 19380
They stressed to make sure Department C is included in the address, or
somewhere on the envelope (ie/ Attn: Dept. C). Is there anyone else out
there, besides me an' Dennis, who got stiffed?
Pete
|
3429.98 | FYI - A2000HD/A2091(-40) Manuals | CRISTA::CAPRICCIO | Nothing personal | Fri Jul 06 1990 13:17 | 11 |
| Well, last week I finally decided to write to CBM to claim my missing
manual and *they* arrived yesterday. Along with the A2091(-40) manual
was the updated "Introduction to the A2000HD" manual. Now that's what I
call service! Although it's been updated, the A2000HD manual still has
a lot of old screen shots in it and most of the stuff is duplicated in
the A2091 manual. Even though getting through to the service department
(and trying to explain your situation) at CBM has been frustrating at
times, they have more than made up for it with responsiveness and lack
of red tape. Good job CBM service!
Pete
|