T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3361.1 | camera is not included | SALEM::LEIMBERGER | | Thu Jan 18 1990 08:52 | 14 |
| Digi-View would be a good starting point.Version 4.0 has been giving
better pictures than ever. There are packages that do realtime capture
but at a cost in resolution. Digi-View gives you the digitizer that
connects to the parallel port,software,and a color filter wheel
to be used with a black,and white video camera.You could use a color
camera if you bought a color splitter. The paint program you need
will depend on how you digitize the picture. If you digitize in
ham then you cannot use DeluxPaint III to edit the pictures.Digi-
Paint will allow you to edit ham images,but lacks some of the nicer
features of Dpaint,but will allow much better image manipulation.
Any of the paint programs will print to the LJ252,but of course
you will want a parallel switch to use if you have a parrallel printer.
bill
|
3361.2 | | MQOFS::DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Mon Jan 22 1990 16:22 | 11 |
| The source makes ALL the difference in the world, I have a Frame
Grabber, and I always tought my pictures lacked the quality the
Digiview gave untill I bought a B+W camera and the PROPER color wheel
(from the Memory location). Now I get the best of both worlds, real
time video digitizing from camera, camcorder or VCR + quality from
pictures or drawings. I digitized some pictures from my beta deck and
the improvement in quality was quite impressive just going from B2 to
B1.
Jean
|
3361.3 | | MSVAX::BARRETT | Is my PC a PicoVAX? | Mon Jan 22 1990 16:49 | 7 |
| Under good conditions and with good equipment - how does the quality
of a Digiview Gold capture using a color camera with a color splitter
compare to the b/w with the color wheel?
I already have a color cammera and the cost of just a splitter would
save me some bucks over the b/w setup; but I don't want any big
sacrifice in quality.
|
3361.4 | WHAT ELSE DO I NEED? | POLAR::GOSLING | | Tue Jan 23 1990 10:57 | 12 |
|
Along the same lines as .3, if you have a CAMCORDER/HANDYCAM (I
have a SONY 8mm) can I use it with Digiview Gold WITHOUT a color
splitter??
I'm itchin' to get Digiview. Timing will depend on the cost of
any addons I might need.
Thanks
Art
|
3361.5 | | MQOFS::DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Tue Jan 23 1990 11:02 | 9 |
| Well the average color camera has about a 230-250 lines of HORIZONTAL
resolution, so a vertical line in 640 x 400 could be a pixel or two off
and that makes those vertical lines jagged. There are color camera
that have better resolution than that, but the cost may be a factor
(like $10K+). The Panasonic BW camera has a 550 lines of horizontal
resolution and in all Amiga screen sizes, the difference is noticeable.
Jean
|
3361.6 | more on.... | MQOFS::DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Tue Jan 23 1990 11:29 | 13 |
| Re -.1
All I know of Digi View is that the source MUST be stable for the
time it takes to digitize the picture (quite a few seconds). I saw
some pictures that were digitized with Digi View from an 8mm deck that
had a perfect still image they were in black and white. A color
splitter can be used with Digi View but then again, the source must be
stable during the whole process. I have some reviews from Amiga world
for some of the more common digitizers, if you want a copy of the
article, send me mail with your mail stop.
Jean
|
3361.7 | STILL PUZZLED | POLAR::GOSLING | | Tue Jan 23 1990 11:54 | 31 |
|
>
> <<< Note 3361.6 by MQOFS::DESROSIERS "Lets procrastinate....tomorrow" >>>
> -< more on.... >-
>
> Re -.1
Jean,
Re .-2 perhaps?
Assuming it was my entry you were responding to (and not your own
- although I too talk to myself at times :-), I quess my question
is a bit more basic in terms of how DigiView works with a
camcorder. Do I / can I simply mount the Camcorder on a copy
stand, aim/focus it on a photograph, have the Camcorder video out
attached to the DigiView 'box', and capture the signal on the
AMIGA?
Thanks for the offer of the copy of AMIGA World, but I have them
all (except the first issue - I bought my A1000 when the second
issue was on the stands). It was the article on digitizers that
appeared a few months ago that got me thinking about the DigiView
/ Camcorder combination. I can't remember the exact quote, but it
implied (after some discussion about b/w cameras, colour splitters
and colour wheels) that if you had a Camcorder you didn't need all
this stuff - "Just plug it in and away you go". Ain't life
grand!!
Art
|
3361.8 | My experience so far | BOMBE::MOORE | BaN CaSe_sEnSiTiVe iDeNtIfIeRs! | Tue Jan 23 1990 18:15 | 16 |
| Having recently acquired a camcorder and DigiView, perhaps I can answer
some of your questions. I was unable to locate any color splitters
(around Christmas time). Most places I called had been carrying units
made by CMI, which has gone out of business. The only other brand I've
heard of is SunRise Industries, and there seemed to be a general
shortage of those. Anyway, I can't comment on the color splitter setup
yet.
I have managed to digitize some things in black and white, using either
the camcorder or a 4 head (freeze frame) VCR. I'd say the results were
'acceptable', though I can believe the the b&w camera could produce
sharper images. I tried using the color wheel with the camcorder to
get color images, but I got some kind of vertical striping effect,
especially with the red filter. Not sure what causes this, but I
suspect the camcorder is trying to do some type of color balance
adjustment or something. This was rather disappointing...
|
3361.9 | re. -1 | POLAR::GOSLING | | Wed Jan 24 1990 09:56 | 9 |
| re. -1
Sounds like a colour splitter is required. I will be interested
to hear what the results are with a splitter added to your setup.
Thanks
Art
|
3361.10 | | MSVAX::BARRETT | It's not a mouse, it's a rat | Wed Jan 24 1990 12:45 | 6 |
| I'd be interested also. Part of the reason I asked about this was
that I also know that DigiView is picky about what shades of red/blue/green
are used during the capture. I wondered how different the color
splitter "colors" were compared to the color wheel. It's already
been stated that the resolution is less when using a color splitter
- how do the brightness and color reproduction fair?
|
3361.11 | SunRise digitizer gets good results | WOODRO::OSBORNE | | Wed Jan 24 1990 13:29 | 10 |
| I've used a SunRise color splitter to digitize from a digital VCR,
and from an OLD Panasonic color camera. As far as I can tell, the
colors are as good as, or better than, the color wheel setup. They
are quite accurate coming from the VCR, but it does require some
bit of fiddling to get the proper balance. DigiView allows several
methods of color adjustment itself, and the SunRise splitter has
a color balance adjustment knob. The only problem is that the "split"
signal doesn't have enough information for you to know if the balance
is good. So it's pretty much trial-and-error, but I've gotten good
results with a little effort.
|
3361.12 | Hmm. | WJG::GUINEAU | | Wed Jan 24 1990 13:50 | 7 |
| Abel has the Sunrize splitter listed:
Electronic Color Splitter --------- Sunrize ---------------28 $119.95 $ 84.08
John
|
3361.13 | | MSVAX::BARRETT | It's not a mouse, it's a rat | Wed Jan 24 1990 15:46 | 2 |
| I'm wondering if it would be worthwhile for someone to upload a
couple of high-res pictures "snapped" using a color splitter?
|
3361.14 | Add a light box | DPDMAI::ANDERSONA | The Alan in Tulsa not Atlanta | Fri Feb 09 1990 21:26 | 11 |
| I added a light box to the setup mentioned in .11. Purchased from
K-Mart for $90.00. It was originaly designed to videotape photographs
it sports a built in macro lens and does a pretty good job. The light
source tend to add a slight blue tint to Digiview but that is easy to
adjust for. It can handle up to a 4X6 inch photo. It also works well
with a 35MM camera to reproduce negatives from old one of a kind
photos. If you are into genealogy, it runs on 4 D cells and is
quite portable.
Alan
|