[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hydra::amiga_v1

Title:AMIGA NOTES
Notice:Join us in the *NEW* conference - HYDRA::AMIGA_V2
Moderator:HYDRA::MOORE
Created:Sat Apr 26 1986
Last Modified:Wed Feb 05 1992
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5378
Total number of notes:38326

2976.0. "New Uploads" by MCDNLD::MACDONALD () Mon Oct 02 1989 11:53

    I've uploaded several late releases of various programs to 
    
    DICKNS::USER:[MACDONALD.AMIGA.NEW]
    
    Included are,
    
    PowerPacker V2.3A
    SuperView V3.0
    ScripIt V1.1
    Lharc V0.5
                                  
    and some others.
    
    Note that all these files are archived with Lharc. Lharc is considered
    the new standard for archiving Amiga files! I've included ARC'ed
    and ZOO'ed versions of Lharc in the directory. Files archived with
    Lharc have .LZH filenames and are substantially smaller than their
    ARC'ed or ZOO'ed counterparts.
    
    Perhaps someone would care to copy them over to one of the larger
    Amiga libraries on the network before I delete them?
    
    -Paul
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2976.1Protection, pluheeze!FRAMBO::BALZERChristian Balzer DTN:785-1029Mon Oct 02 1989 12:3112
    Erh, uhm, Paul, how about setting the protections in a way that
    will allow us lower lifeforms to sneak that stuff from your directory?
    ;-) ;-) ;-)
    
    BTW, I personally will not switch from ZOO to LHARC before LHARC
    will adopt some ZOO functions like directory structures, etc.
    I could live with it's speed, since it produces smaller results,
    but still...
    
    Regards,
    
    <CB>
2976.2Still prefer .ZOO'sCGOFS::DREWSteve DrewMon Oct 02 1989 13:089
        We agree, ZOO works nicely on VMS  and supports all directory
        structures properly.  Personally I would'nt switch  to  LHARC
        just to save a few more bytes of  storage.    We  just  about
        always unarc or unzoo on VMS to read the  docs  first, before
        deciding to download.
        
        /* The CGO guys */
        
2976.3Yup!FRAMBO::BALZERChristian Balzer DTN:785-1029Mon Oct 02 1989 13:1313
    Re: .2
    
    RIGHT! 
    I almost forgot about this aspect, but I just started my UseNet
    NEWS extract batch job that zoo's todays worth of news and shuffles
    them afterwards down to the A500.
    
    But what about those pesky protections, Paul? 
    Are you having lunch or what? I'm about to go home. ;-)
    
    Regards,
    
    <CB> 
2976.4DICKNS::MACDONALDWA1OMM 7.093/145.05/223.58 AX.25Mon Oct 02 1989 13:151
Hmm .. lemme check!
2976.5LEVERS::PLOUFFcan&#039;t memorize Zen...Wed Oct 04 1989 15:2817
    Interestingly, the source to the LHARC compression algorithm was
    published last May on the Usenet newsgroup comp.binaries.ibm.pc.
    The moderator of that group is Rahul Dhesi, who is also the author
    of ZOO.  Perhaps Mr. Dhesi can be persuaded to add hybrid Huffman-LZW
    coding as another ZOO compression scheme.  I agree with previous
    replies that ZOO's support for full Amiga filenames is a strong
    argument in favor of not switching.
    
    The source archive, which will compress or decompress one MS-DOS
    file at a time, is at
    
    	CSCMAS::SYS$MSDOS:[ARC-LBR]LZHSRC10.ARC
    
    Let's see... compress, ARC, ZOO, PAK, ZIP, WARP, Powerpacker, LHARC --
    how many "standards" do we really need for disk/file compression?
    
    Wes