T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2878.1 | | WJG::GUINEAU | In the calm calculus of reason | Thu Aug 31 1989 09:54 | 11 |
| Hey <CB>, pretty ugly background color :-)
Seriously, I just converted it to SIXEL with CSIX and printed it on on LJ250.
It's almost unreadable... Sooo I edited the sixel file and changed the
background to white. Looks nice! Good job CB!
wjg::amiga:take5.six
John
|
2878.2 | ffffllllliiiiiccccccckkkkkkkeeerrrrrr!!!! | FRAMBO::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Thu Aug 31 1989 10:06 | 11 |
| Re: -1
Yeah, but with this color ya can bear interlace for some minutes
a day... ;-)
The final ZOO archive including the documentation will have this
fixed.
Regards,
<CB>
|
2878.3 | I took the plunge | DPDMAI::ANDERSONA | This space for rent | Tue Sep 05 1989 20:50 | 17 |
| Looks good a lot better than the one I 'borrowed` from the Amiga 1000
prints. I went head and built it this last weekend. My Teac drive is
still on order, but with the interface connected to my Amiga 500's
external bus it fixed the Trackdisk.device bug. My guess that all the
Amiga needed was a RDY signal from anything but DF0:. At least PCC720
and PCF720 work without TDpatch12 and I was able to reinstall my KS1.3
rom. Cross Dos 3.2 is smart enough to tell that DF1: does not exist but
PCC720 and PCF720 thinks that it is write protected.
A couple of small typoes. The drawing has U5 pin 6 going to J1 and J2
pin 22 (INDX). I put U5 pin 6 on J1 pin 11 (CHNG). Also the SEL1
signal J1 pin 21 crosses but does not connect to U1 pin 1.
Thanks for the drawing I will post the results when ever my drive
arrives.
Alan
|
2878.4 | I'll check it out... | FRAMBO::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Wed Sep 06 1989 07:24 | 10 |
| Re: .3
Thanks for the input and the compliments... ;-)
I'll check the stuff you mentioned vs my original drawing/actual
PCB, and will correct any mishaps in the final version.
Regards,
<CB>
|
2878.5 | It works GREAT | DPDMAI::ANDERSONA | This space for rent | Mon Sep 11 1989 19:07 | 72 |
| To start off with I have never had another floppy drive connected to my
Amiga so I am not sure exactly how it is supposed to behave.
My Teac 55F arrived the other day. The interface works great. In 5.25
inch mode the Amiga ID's the drive as a 5.25 inch drive. The Teac 55F
is capable of 80 tracks but despite what the mountlist entry states I
cannot format past track 39. This must be a limit of the
Trackdisk.Device. Setting the Mountlist entry for 40 tracks the disk
will mount and format correctly. Also the OS bug is still present and
PcC720 and PcF720 get the -4 error. Its not very useful to me in this
mode.
On the other hand with the interface configured for 3.5 inch mode and
the HS jumper removed on the Teac drive the drive auto configures as a
3.5 inch drive and can be formatted as such under workbench. Marauder
will even do an image copy from the internal 3.5 inch to the Teac. This
is great. A box of 25, 5.25 inch floppies go for $12.46 while a box of
25, 3.5 inch floppies go for $29.99. This last weekend I recovered
$35.00 worth of 3.5 inch by doing a backup to the Teac drive. It looks
like I wont have to buy another 3.5 inch floppy for a long time. Also
as an added plus since the Amiga thinks this is a 3.5 inch drive the OS
bug is fixed, So CrossDos and PcC720 and PcF720 work. But the original
PC format program won't run since it does not see a 5.25 inch floppy
attached, (no big loss). The HS jumper has to be removed to format the
drive under Workbench without it it gets a sector read error trying to
verify track 0. This jumper when removed must slow the spindle speed
down to achieve a higher density so the drive can read/write 11
sectors.
I was able to read a few 360K 5.25 inch MSDOS floppys with PcC720 and
CrossDos. Also I was able to read/write a few 160K single sided MSDOS
floppies on my Rainbow and Amiga. I cannot get PcC720 or Crossdos to
read a Rainbow MSDOS Floppy. CrossDos gets a not a dos disk requester
and PC720 gets a FAT table corrupt error. I think I have all the
information for Format editor but havent gotten it to work just yet.
The Teac drive is a tad slower than the internal 3.5 inch using the old
filing system. I mounted it with the fast filling system and it worked
but when I tried the same thing with the internal 3.5 inch drive two
floppies got a read/write error running DiskPerf2. So I could not
compare the difference between the Teac 5.25 and the internal 3.5 inch
under FFS. I can upload the results if any one is interested.
I could not get the Disk change switch to work. I need to go through
and verify that my wire wrapping is good. I was having to much fun
playing with my new toy.
A few quarks.
1. If there is not a valid workbench formatted floppy in the drive
when you LoadWb then the drive comes up as bad. You either have to
do a diskchange with a valid formatted disk or run PcC720 and then
exit it. If you do not PcC720 and CrossDoss cannot access the disk
properly. CrossDos gets a Not a DOS disk requester and PcC720 says
the root directory is full.
2. I have a small RAD: set up to do an Auto Reboot from. I have the
Bootpri set so that it will boot from a floppy if present. If I
leave a non bootable floppy in DF0: it will try DF0: then hit DF1:
(the Teac) even if the Teac drive has an image copy of my bootable
workbench floppy it will not boot I get a default workbench screen
and cannot get to a C directory. (no commands work). Removing the
floppy from DF0: and rebooting reboots from RAD: as normal. It hits
DF1: but ignores it. I do not know if a KS1.3 ROM should boot from
any floppy but DF0:
Thanks <CB> for the interface drawing this was lots of fun. Good work.
Alan
|
2878.7 | Could work even better. ;-) | FRAMBO::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Tue Sep 12 1989 05:33 | 50 |
| Re: .5
First of, a corrected, black on white drawing is now available at
the usual place (see .1) as "Take-5.final". Doc is still under
construction, sorry.
>My Teac 55F arrived the other day. The interface works great. In 5.25
>inch mode the Amiga ID's the drive as a 5.25 inch drive. The Teac 55F
>is capable of 80 tracks but despite what the mountlist entry states I
>cannot format past track 39. This must be a limit of the
>Trackdisk.Device. Setting the Mountlist entry for 40 tracks the disk
>will mount and format correctly. Also the OS bug is still present and
>PcC720 and PcF720 get the -4 error. Its not very useful to me in this
>mode.
If in the 5.25" mode, the Amiga will think of the drive as an original
Amiga 5.25" drive, which has only 40 tracks...
It will however work just great with the original CBM utilities
like PCCopy and PCFormat...
This is what this mode is all about and things like CrossDOS make
it somewhat obsolete.
However it's great if you're low on RAM and don't want to have that
drive mapped in and a trackdisk.device with its buffers allocted for
it.
>I could not get the Disk change switch to work. I need to go through
>and verify that my wire wrapping is good. I was having to much fun
>playing with my new toy.
You should really fix this, see below...
>A few quarks.
>1. If there is not a valid workbench formatted floppy in the drive
> when you LoadWb then the drive comes up as bad. You either have to
> do a diskchange with a valid formatted disk or run PcC720 and then
> exit it. If you do not PcC720 and CrossDoss cannot access the disk
> properly. CrossDos gets a Not a DOS disk requester and PcC720 says
> the root directory is full.
This is because of the broken diskchange circuit. By default, the
circuit will tell the Amiga that a disk is present, unless told
so by the appropriate switch. I have attached a microswitch to my
TEAC drive in a way that that it will report the presence of a disk
by the position of the handle (closed=present, open=no disk). This
way it works just like an original 3.5" drive...
I have no idea on 2., but I don't use RAD: anyway (to flakey)...
Hope that helps,
<CB>
|
2878.8 | RAD? | BOMBE::MOORE | BaN CaSe_sEnSiTiVe iDeNtIfIeRs! | Tue Sep 12 1989 20:26 | 4 |
| RAD: flakey? Could you elaborate? Are you talking system crashes,
lost/corrupted data, failure to survive warm boot, or what?
Is another version (ASDG, etc.) better?
|
2878.9 | Lost in nearly every 2nd time... | FRAMBO::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Wed Sep 13 1989 04:00 | 15 |
| Re: .8
I'm talking mainly failure to survive even "harmless" warm boots.
Besides some gotchas like fixed size, there's also a "real" bug
in the current ramdisk.device, which causes the system to hang the
first time you try to reinstall RAD: after a crash that killed it.
No, other versions have different moot points, the best thing would
be an autobooting VD0: with automatic housekeeping...
See also recent discussions on UseNet about this topic.
Regards,
<CB>
|
2878.10 | Works for me | RLAV::LITTLE | Todd Little, NYA SWS, 323-4475 | Tue Sep 26 1989 00:30 | 10 |
| re: .9
I'm curious about your bad experiences with RAD:. I'm using RAD: to
effectively make my C-Ltd 500 SCSI controller an autoboot device. I
create a minimal bootable RAD: that immediately transfers control to my
hard disk. I've not seen any of the problems you mention. I more
often then not have to go out of my way to get rid of RAD: so I can
boot a game floppy.
-tl
|
2878.11 | | FRAMBO::BALZER | Christian Balzer DTN:785-1029 | Tue Sep 26 1989 08:55 | 11 |
| Re: .10
Well, maybe it's my hardware (obese Agnus [yup, I used the SetPatch
-R opttion], A2620) or the insane amount of programs or their bad
habits that I usually run.
RAD: (for me) simply wasn't worth the RAM: for the marginal faster boot
procress, if I took it's lack of stability into account.
Regards,
<CB>
|
2878.12 | | LODGE::LEN | David M. Len | Tue Sep 26 1989 09:33 | 9 |
| re: .11
I have an auto-booting hard drive. And RAD: stability issues aside, I
still don't think that setting up RAD: to speed the boot process is
worth the effort. The only time I now use RAD: is if I want some fast
temporary space that I need to survive a crash. Back when I was
strictly floppy based, RAD: was definetly worth the effort, and I used
DISKCOPY to load my entire workbench floppy to RAD:.
|
2878.13 | Works even better now | DPDMAI::ANDERSONA | This space for rent | Fri Oct 06 1989 23:17 | 16 |
| <CB> I found the connection I missed It works now. Again good job.
.10 I also have the CLtd also. I also use rad: for a minimal auto boot
disk. But I set the bootpri low enough so that if a floppy is in df0:
it will boot first. So when I am tired of working and want to play I
insert a floppy in df0: reboot and play. When it is time to work
again simply remove the floppy and reboot RAD: then takes over and
brings up the hard disk. Saves wear and tear on the floppy and it is
noticeably faster.
I havent had any misses that I could not explain to something I or a
unfreindly program did.
Alan
|