T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2465.1 | answer ? | YUPPY::GOLDSTEIN | | Tue Apr 11 1989 12:05 | 16 |
| Steve,
Look through some of the othe notes ie dir/tit=hard
But for the best way on an A500 you need to use the EXPANSION
Port on the Left-Hand side with an adapter.
The D.E.C. drive are based on the ST506 (non-intelligent
controller).An Omti 3520/Adaptec 4000 will convert the drive to
SCSI .
There are several manufactures who sell HOST/Adaptors to SCSI...
I hope this helps
Regards
Steve G.
|
2465.2 | Whats' a Hybrid? | HARPO::WARD | | Tue Apr 11 1989 12:13 | 9 |
| The 486 Standardization committee is specing a new file format
for new 20-Mbyte, floppy disk drives. I know that Supra has
had ads with such beasties. Since the A590 has an internal 20MB
hard drive, I could see some applications where floppy mass storagw
would make sense for backup. [Animation clips]
If you want hybrids, I thought SCSI did that (drives, networks....)
I'd stay very conservative on this.
|
2465.3 | | WJG::GUINEAU | | Tue Apr 11 1989 14:04 | 25 |
|
To answer your question directly, No, there is no direct way of attaching
a hard disk to the floppy port.
RDxx drives, as mentioned, are ST-506. Also mentioned is that this is an
"unintelligent" interface. What does that mean?
ST506 devices have only the barest required hardware/firmware to do only the
most fundemental operations on the drive. For example, all an ST506 drive can
do on it's own is read and write raw MFM data to the media, move the heads
in or out a specified number of tracks, switch heads, and tell the interface
when a seek is complete or when one of some defined set of errors occurs
(ex. Write Fault).
The host must do everything else. For example, encoding/decoding the MFM data
from/to "bytes", finding and separating data from headers, remembering what
head/cylinder the device is on etc.
So a host for an ST506 device must have both digital and analog hardware.
(and this is why the floppy port won't work) it must have a phase lock loop
to detect data (in effect). And then encoding/decoding circuits ECC/CRC
generation, etc..
John
|
2465.4 | thanx | KLO::COLLINS | STEVE | Wed Apr 12 1989 05:48 | 24 |
|
Thanx for the info...
I've read just about every note that mentions a hard disk and by
now am starting to get to grips with what's needed to add a hard
disk to the expansion port . The problem is things like the
Adaptec 4000 controller are impossible to get here in Ireland .
( I might as well be looking for space shuttle parts ).
It looks like my best shot might be with the interface that Ingo
Sturm posted from a German magazine .But there doesn't seem to be
any news of software availability yet .. The Ompti interface should
be more readily available as it's used in PC's .
I'd love to put something like an RQDX3 and RD53 on the A500 but
I don't know enough to write a hard disk driver and with only one
floppy disk and no decent manuals is's very hard to get into any
kind of programming.
Would it be feasable to use say a PD 68000 assembler/disassembler
and write a driver for an RQDX3 RD53 configuration. ?
Steve...
|
2465.5 | not RQDX3 | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Wed Apr 12 1989 08:00 | 4 |
| The RQDX3 won't work on the Amiga. The RQDX3 interfaces between ST506
and the Q-bus, and the Amiga doesn't have a Q-bus. You need a
controller that interfaces to the Amiga's bus.
John Sauter
|
2465.6 | OK .... But.... | KLO::COLLINS | STEVE | Wed Apr 12 1989 09:16 | 17 |
|
re.5
Yes John , but I'm sure you could interface the Amiga 68000 bus
to the RQDX3 "after" the Qbus drivers on the RQDX3 . I can't see
how this would be a problem ... But as I say the hard disk driver
would have to talk to the RQDX3 registers.
While were on the subject does anyone know how similar the programming
interface on an RQDX3 would be to other ST506 interfaces. Are the
RQDX3 registers similar in format to an Adaptec 4000 etc..
What I mean is would it be totally out of the question to modify
a hard disk driver file meant for a different interface ...
Steve..
|
2465.7 | | WJG::GUINEAU | | Wed Apr 12 1989 10:07 | 10 |
|
> While were on the subject does anyone know how similar the programming
> interface on an RQDX3 would be to other ST506 interfaces. Are the
> RQDX3 registers similar in format to an Adaptec 4000 etc..
Ha! (Sorry, had to laugh). RQDX3 speaks MSCP. NOT A simple programming task
to emulate. You'ld have to even emulate the U/Q port.
John
|
2465.8 | also buss protocol; try A2000 box + A2090 | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Wed Apr 12 1989 10:51 | 16 |
| It's not just a matter of the drivers, there's also the buss-level
handshake protocol. I don't know what the Amiga uses, but Murphy's Law
says that it won't be the same as the Q-bus.
On top of that, there's MSCP, as mentioned in 2465.7.
I think interfacing an RQDX3 would be more trouble than it's worth.
You'd probably end up building a box as big as the RQDX3 itself, just
to make it talk to the Amiga.
I understand there is a device that attaches to the A500 and provides
you with an A2000 "slot". If this is true, you could place an A2090
in that "slot". The A2090 speaks ST506 (as well as SCSI) so it should
be possible to interface an RD54 to it. There is already driver
software for AmigaDOS that knows how to deal with the A2090.
John Sauter
|
2465.9 | HARD-Tape ? | HARPO::WARD | | Tue Apr 18 1989 12:11 | 8 |
| HARD/Floppy Hybrid == NO
Tape/Floppy Hybrid == YES
PC Magazine covers such beasties on page 27, April 25 1989. I wonder
if random access tape is a viable compromise. Just wondering out-loud.
Paul
|