T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1827.1 | Epson LX800 | COOKIE::WITHERS | Trad. Anon. c. 1988 | Thu Oct 27 1988 18:42 | 7 |
| I'm real happy with my Epson LX800. Has most of the features of
more expensive printers, pretty-darned-good NLQ, reasonable graphics
rendition, and can be had for as low as $179 mail-order. I bought
mine 1.25 years ago and have only had to change the (cloth) ribon.
It's not the fastest around, but I think its probably the best
good-cheap printer around.
|
1827.2 | A second for LX800 | DPDMAI::MARASKY | | Thu Oct 27 1988 23:37 | 5 |
| I was in the same boat that you were in about a month ago and went
and bought an Epson LX800. Got it about a week later at a total
cost of about 200.00 including parallel cable and shipping. So
far I'm tickled to death with it. For the money it is probably
the best that you can get and the most reliable.
|
1827.3 | LX800 vs. 1091i-m2 ? | MIST::TBAKER | Tom Baker - DECwest CSSE | Fri Oct 28 1988 00:09 | 8 |
| So far 2 votes for the Epson LX800. In some of the earlier notes
people seemed to like the Panasonic KXP1091i-Mod.2. This seems to
run about the same price as the LX800. Has anyone seen both of these
printers?
Thanks for the responses,
tom
|
1827.4 | I luv my LX800 | EUCLID::OWEN | Steve WILLBURY Owen | Fri Oct 28 1988 07:39 | 9 |
| I don't know about the Panasonic that much, but they had it at the
store where it bought my Epson LX800. The Panasonic looked kind
of fragile. Ya know, If you sneezed funny, it might not work.
The Epson is pretty solid and I've had nothing but success!
But I've never used the Panasonic nor do I know anyone who owns
one, so please take my comment with a grain of salt.
Steve O
|
1827.5 | 1091i works for me! | NEWVAX::FILER | | Fri Oct 28 1988 08:41 | 14 |
| I have used my Panasonic kxp1091i for about a year now with
out any problems. (except setting it up under word perfict which
was realy my fault) My wife got a 80386 to run ms-dos on (i don't
know why that stuff is not very good) and I keep moving the printer
back and forth between the two systems with out causing any problems.
One thing I like about this printer over the la50 is the switch
that changes it to draft/nlq. You can still change it with software
but I like the switch. It also has never had paper feel problems
or xoff problems like most of the la50s end up with.
I think the Panasonic printer may cost a few bucks more than
the Epson. The Epson line seems to be sold by ALL the discount/mail
order places which keeps the price down.
Well good luck with what ever you decide to get.
Jeff Filer MAAHPS
|
1827.6 | Please add detail to replys | CAM::ARENDT | DDT - The first and still the best | Fri Oct 28 1988 09:01 | 12 |
| For those of use who are not familiar with your brand please include
specs such as;
Printer width
Type Daisy Wheel, 9 pin, 18 pin, 24 pin
Sheet feed available
And any others you like.
Thank you
Harry
|
1827.7 | | PNO::SANDERSB | a belagana | Fri Oct 28 1988 12:24 | 35 |
|
I've had my Star NL-10 for about 3 years now and it works great.
I purchased it mailorder for $269 with parallel interface. I've
only used it on two machines so far. The first an Atari 130XE
and now an Atari 520ST.
It has a simple sheet feeder with it, but I use that tractor
feed, so I can't tell you much about that. It has a narrow
platen, only supports up to 9" wide paper. It is only a 9-pin
printer, but the Near Letter Quality mode is much better than a
LA-50.
It is fully Epson campatible and supports graphics, sub- and
super- scripting. It will print in condensed print, giving up to
at least 132 characters on a line (maybe more, I don't use it
this way much, thus don't remember the maximum).
New versions in the Star line are the NX-1000 and NX-1000C. Both
of these retail for around $200 with the "C" version being color,
and runs about $30 to $50 more.
My guess that the Star desiginations are something or the order -
NX-xxxx - indicates the normal version.
NL-xxxx - indicates a heavy duty version, thus is a bit
more, price wise.
Bob
(Yes I know this isn't the Atari ST notes file, my brother-in-law
has an Amiga 1000 with a Microbotics Starboard memory expander on
it. So I have the best of both worlds, I get to use both
machines! Besides, printers, monitors, modems, and disk drives
aren't (or at least shouldn't be) specific to any one brand of
system and should be transferable to the next machine purchased.)
|
1827.8 | Go Panasonic | RAVEN1::EVERHART | | Fri Oct 28 1988 13:48 | 16 |
| I have a Panasonic 1080i. (About $150 now) And NO, IT'S NOT
FRAGILE! I've dropped it, travelled with it many times, including
a 1500 mile trip that I took several times. I never even bother
putting the printer in the box any more. I just put a towel over
it to keep from scratching it, and Go. It has really taken a beating,
and shows no signs of quitting.
The 1080i is fully epson compatible, and supposedly has several
extra modes that an epson does no have, although I don't know what
they are. If I can remember, I'll bring in my owner's manual on
monday, and list the features.
The only trouble I have had to date is with a "cheap" off brand
ribbon I bought for it. Now, I buy my ribbons mail order from MEI,
and they are the Panasonic brands. No trouble with them.
- Chris
|
1827.9 | Panasonic owner | HPSCAD::DMCARR | This note's for you... | Fri Oct 28 1988 14:57 | 15 |
|
Another vote for the Panasonic KX-P1091i (model II). I've had it for
only a few months now, (using it with my C=128) and agree with a previous
reply that it is NOT fragile. Very well built, fairly quick (192 cps
draft, 38 nlq). For a 9 pin printer, I think its print quality is
exceptional. Switchable settings (draft, nlq, bold proportional
and compressed modes) are a real plus. Has both single sheet and
tractor feed. Full Epson compatability, as well as IBM Proprinter mode.
8 bit parallel interface, 2 year warranty. The manual is very complete.
My only (minor) complaints are (1) the tractor feed is after the platen
rather than before it, causing you to waste a page to get the last printed
page off & (2) the cover isn't hinged, but snaps on. Paid ~$180 for it
at a recent computer show.
-Dom
|
1827.10 | Star NX-1000-C | LEDS::BUSCH | Dave Busch at NKS1-2 | Fri Oct 28 1988 17:58 | 24 |
| I've had a Star NX-1000-C (color) for about a month now and I'm very satisfied.
I also have a Star Gemini 10-X for five years now and was also satisfied with
that, except that I had to do a couple of repairs on it on occasion (blown
transistor array and paper feed motor, both of which I was able to do myself).
The NX-1000 has a number of features that attracted me to it. Specifically, the
NLQ fonts are really good, especially for a 9 pin machine. Besides draft mode,
there are three built-in NLQ fonts: prestige, Sans Serif (with both lower case
and small caps for lower case) and Orator, all with italics and various pitches.
There is a single sheet feeder and the tractor is behind the platen, and the
machine has reverse feed. One really nice feature is the ability to run the
paper backwards and "park" it behind the platen while you feed a single sheet
through. You can also run the paper forward to tear off a sheet and then park
the paper, and then, by pulling back on the bail and releasing it again, the
paper is positioned back to the top margin. There are lots of front panel
accessible things you can do, such as clear the buffer, micro-feed forward or
reverse, lock in any font (regardless of what the program tells it to do), and
you can design your own NLQ font and download it to the printer (at the expense
of a smaller working buffer).
I got it at the Memory Location for $325 ($265 for the B&W equivalent) but they
are available for lots less elsewhere.
Dave
|
1827.11 | decisions, decisions... | MIST::TBAKER | Tom Baker - DECwest CSSE | Fri Oct 28 1988 19:41 | 27 |
| It seems like a real toss-up. Everyone seems to like their LX800s
and their 1091i-M2s. I called two dealers who each sold both printers.
One liked the Panasonic and the other the Epson. I've seen both
these printers in mail order ads for $179 so price is the same.
The Star NX1000 sounds good too. I've seen that for $169.
The 1091i seems the fastest at 192cps followed by LX800 at 180cps
and NX1000 at 144cps. The NX1000 seems to have more features,multiple
fonts,etc. but the panasonic has a 2 yr. warranty as opposed to
1 yr for the others.
The salesman who liked the Epson said it had more advanced paper
handling capibilities but one the one who liked the panasonic said
it didn't. Anyone know for sure?
The salesman who liked the Epson also liked the NX1000. The color
NX1000 for $229 sounds good too. But I don't want to spend a lot
on color ribbons when I mostly print B & W. The salesman said that
black ribbons worked in the color NX1000 but it wasn't mentioned
in the manual and it looked like if you sent a color command to
the printer with the black ribbon in, you could damage the ribbon
transport mechanism. Is this true?
thanks
tom
|
1827.12 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Fri Oct 28 1988 21:08 | 14 |
| I have the Panasonic 1091i-M1. 160cps I believe.
the two big features for me are speed and the print style selection
slide switch. There are lots of other features buried in the
printer, but I mainly use it for printing docs and program listings.
You really notice the speed when you are waiting for a listing,
160 is reasonable, slower is painful (I used my brother's Star
Gemini 10X for a while, not sure what it's speed was).
The style switch means you don't have to play with printer commands
just to print something in a compressed font. Nice.
-Dave
|
1827.13 | 1091i print speed... | HPSCAD::DMCARR | This note's for you... | Sat Oct 29 1988 21:34 | 7 |
| I checked my Panasonic 1091 manual for the actual print speed (entered
the 192 cps from a computer catalog I had sitting in the office). The
192 is a bit misleading as it only prints that fast in draft elite mode.
In draft pica mode its 160 cps. Still pretty quick.
As far as paper handling, there are all sorts of commands for 1/8, 7/72,
1/6, n/72, and n/216 inch paper feeds, if that's what you're looking for.
|
1827.14 | | STC::HEFFELFINGER | Give my body to science fiction. | Mon Oct 31 1988 20:11 | 5 |
| Another happy LX800 owner, but I'm easy to please. I've no idea
how fast it is. With the 1.2 printer device as slow as it is, who
can tell how fast the printer really is anyway. :-)
Gary (who still doesn't have 1.3)
|
1827.15 | Oz Panasonic vote. | GIDDAY::PARSONS | So many notes, so little time..... | Mon Oct 31 1988 22:55 | 12 |
| Just to go across another bigger pond....
In Australia, prices tend to be double that of USA, but my vote
goes for the Panasonic 1081 (had mine about 3 yrs on Commodore 64
then on Amiga 500). Quite a rugged printer but the ribbon prices
are expensive here. This model has a lot of features that the
imaginative programmer can use and is still available in Sydney
from the Norman Ross (or is it Harvey Norman?) stores for Aus$349
The only maintenance item that all Panasonic owners should look
at is to oil the ends of the square paper drive shaft, as a few
metal filings begin to appear there after a lot of use.
Regards...............Guy
|
1827.16 | thanks | MIST::TBAKER | Tom Baker - DECwest CSSE | Tue Nov 01 1988 01:33 | 11 |
| Thanks for all the help. I've decided on the 1091i ($179 from TCP)
but I don't really know why. The Epson and the Panasonic both sounded
good so I just picked one. I suppose the higher speed and the 2
yr. warrenty nugged me toward the 1091.
I've read some good things about FinePrint and am thinking of buying
it. Has anyone tried it yet? Now I just need to do lots of printing
on my new printer so I can get an old worn out ribbon to use with
FinePrint.
tom
|
1827.17 | KX-P1091i driver?? | MIST::TBAKER | Tom Baker - DECwest CSSE | Wed Nov 09 1988 17:03 | 10 |
| One more problem. What printer driver do I need for the Panasonic
KX-P1091i and where can I get it. I saw there is a PD driver for
KX-P10xx on an Amicus disk. Is this what everyone is using? Is it
on the net anywhere. I need to get WB1.2 working right now. In a
week or so I'll be upgrading to 1.3. Is there a 1.3 printer driver
for the panasonic?
thanks,
tom
|
1827.18 | What I use with the KXP-1091i... | AGNESI::EKLOF | We're everywhere. | Wed Nov 09 1988 17:32 | 7 |
| Re:-.1
Under 1.2, use Epson.
Under 1.3, use EpsonX.
Mark
|
1827.19 | LA50 and Workbench 1.3? | CGFSV2::CADAMS | Clint Adams - Calgary, Canada | Wed Nov 09 1988 18:08 | 12 |
|
Speaking of printer drivers and 1.3, has anyone thought about fixing
the LA50 driver to make it work with 1.3.
There are still a few of us with LA50's and I sure would like to use
it along with the 1.3 printer stuff.
Regards.... Clint
PS.. I don't know enough about the internals to understand why the
driver does not work under 1.3, let alone fix it.
|
1827.20 | Any docs for wb.13 printer drivers? | MLNTSC::MILOS | Milos Roberto TSC Milan | Fri Nov 11 1988 03:48 | 11 |
| Re:.-1
If sombody can point me to docs about new way wb1.3 speaks to drivers,
I'll be happy to try to fix the LA50 driver.
I've not seen any of such docs up to now, and i wonder if such docs
even exists!.
Ciao,
Roberto.
|
1827.21 | Io ho qualcosa | CESARE::ZABOT | Marco Zabot-Adv.Tech.mgr-Turin ACT | Fri Nov 11 1988 17:35 | 5 |
| Let's speak our dialect !
Roberto, io ho la documentazione disponibile circa la 1.3.
Tutto quello che mi risulta eserci e' il manuale che accompagna
la nuova release . Ho anche gli include files che pero' non credo
ti servano a nulla.
|
1827.22 | black horizontal lines | MIST::TBAKER | Tom Baker - DECwest CSSE | Sat Nov 12 1988 22:06 | 19 |
| Well, I've got my 1091i all hooked up and running with the Epson
driver (WB1.2). The one problem I have is when I print bit mapped
graphics with a large dark area like the lady from DigaPaint. I
get horizontal black lines across the page. It looks like the paper
is not being advanced far enough and the top pin of the current
line is overprinting the bottom pin of the previous line. I remember
reading something about white horizontal lines in this conference
but now I can't find that note.
Is this normal for the 1091i or do I have a bad printer or is this
a driver problem?
I realize this is an inexpensive printer and I didn't really buy
it for this type of printing but I would like to know if I have
a bad printer or not.
thanks,
tom
|
1827.23 | Panasonic Driver online... | DNEAST::COMBAR_CURT | Ayuh! I'm from Maine... | Mon Nov 14 1988 08:29 | 7 |
| I have a PANASONIC_KX-P10XX printer driver in my account which is designed
for all panasonic 10XX printers. I've been using it with my 1091
for about a year now with no problems. It's in:
DNEAST::SYS$USER5:[COMBAR_CURT.AMIGA.ARC]PRTDRV.ARC
Curt
|
1827.24 | | WAV14::HICKS | Fan mail from some flounder? | Mon Nov 14 1988 10:54 | 5 |
| Curt:
Have you tried it w/ WB 1.3?
Tim (another P1091i user)
|
1827.25 | Black stripe explained? | GIDDAY::PARSONS | So many notes, so little time..... | Mon Nov 14 1988 16:26 | 8 |
| Re .22
On my 1081 I get those dark lines. In my case it happens on
an older ribbon because the Panasonic ribbon does not have a "turn-over"
feature and the bottom edge gets very little use during
normal draft printing due to the relative rarity of descenders.
A brand new ribbon gives a good black and if kept exclusively
for graphics, it should fade evenly and not get the stripes.
Regards....................Guy
|
1827.26 | OK w/ WB 1.3 | DNEAST::COMBAR_CURT | Ayuh! I'm from Maine... | Mon Nov 14 1988 23:24 | 8 |
| Tim,
I just tried the Panasonic Driver tonight with WB 1.3 on an
A2000 with 1.3 ROMS installed also. I sent a text file and also
printed an IFF image with Brian Conrad's SHOWPRINT. All came out
fine - no black lines!
Curt
|
1827.27 | Looking for the driver and color | NITMOI::WITHERS | So shines a good deed in a weary world.. | Mon Jan 15 1990 09:09 | 17 |
| Well, I thought to re-awaken this note rather than write a new one..
Two things, first, I just recently gave my sister my Panasonic 1080
printer. Can someone give me a current pointer to printer driver for
it as referenced in .25-.26? Thanks..
Second, the reason I parted with it is that I want to go with a color
printer. The one that _The Memory Location_ recommends (at least at
my price range) is the Star NX1000C. I noted a favourable response for
that printer earlier. Does it do a nice job with bitmap output, either
B&W or Color? I briefly saw example output but it was very much
designed for a color printer (eight colors or so, very little mixing).
How does the Star do with an image, say pulled in from Digi-View?
Thanks for any info,
George
|
1827.28 | Tried EpsonXOld? | HPSCAD::DMCARR | Asleep at the mouse | Mon Jan 15 1990 10:21 | 8 |
| Don't know about the one available here on the net, but I've been
using the EpsonXOld driver that comes w/ WB 1.3.2. I initially was
using just the EpsonX driver & was having some difficulties w/
graphics output. Switching to the EpsonXOld seems to have solved the
problem - greyscale looks just fine. This is btw, for a Panasonic 1091,
which shouldn't be too much different than a 1080.
-Dom
|