| Title: | AMIGA NOTES |
| Notice: | Join us in the *NEW* conference - HYDRA::AMIGA_V2 |
| Moderator: | HYDRA::MOORE |
| Created: | Sat Apr 26 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Feb 05 1992 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5378 |
| Total number of notes: | 38326 |
Not sure if this warrants a new note - but what the heck.
I have seen reference on the USENET to 1.3 and ARP, with comments
such as "can't wait until ARP for 1.3 is released", "when can we
expect to see ARP for 1.3", etc.
Is there a problem with the current version of ARP running under
KS and WB 1.3? (I haven't got 1.3 yet so can't experiment.)
Art
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1815.1 | MTWAIN::MACDONALD | WA1OMM 7.093/145.05/223.58 AX.25 | Wed Oct 26 1988 14:27 | 2 | |
ARP in its current version runs fine on V1.3. A new ARP will be
released in December according to Charlie Heath.
| |||||
| 1815.2 | AmigaDOS > ARP | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Wed Oct 26 1988 15:32 | 4 |
Re: .0 I think that the "problem" is that the standard AmigaDOS commands now have a lot of new options missing in the ARP equivalents. | |||||
| 1815.3 | I FEEL BETTER ALREADY - THANKS! | POLAR::GOSLING | Think KANATA INC. | Wed Oct 26 1988 16:08 | 6 |
Thanks for the input, I would have hated to go back to #?
wildcarding. Sounds like we run with a 'mixed bag' until ARP
catches up to 1.3 .
Art
| |||||