T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1795.1 | Only full disk RAD: | SPIDER::LONG | | Thu Oct 20 1988 14:23 | 29 |
| This has me about to put my day-old copy of 1.3 up for sale. I got the full
disk RAD to work and autoboot by using the manual EXACTLY, then realized that
using VD0:, I typically had 1.5 disks worth of stuff in there so I figured I
had three choices:
1. make the high cylinder > 79 for RAD:
2. mount a second RAD: (change the mountlist to add RAD1:)
3. have VD0: and RAD: in ram at the same time.
1 gave me not a dos disk error
2 kept asking me to put disk RAD back in any drive ( shove that expansion ram
down its throat!!! )
3 worked marginally by getting RAD in place then rebooting with my set-up disk
for VD0:. By marginally, I mean that my logicals were all set to VD0:
and badly set up for RAD along with the fact that memory was
disappearing at the rate of about 50K for opening up a workbench
drawer and not coming back ( good thing I had 2.5 meg to get a look at
what was killing me ).
The shell under 1.3 is not as nice as Drew Shell 2.07 as it still uses the
#&%$@ #? wildcard instead of an *. This may be cockpit error but I haven't
been able to change this.
Overall, 1.3 felt like a step backwards for someone like me with a 1000 and no
harddisk. I miss ARP, MACH, RUNBACK, SNIPIT, ARC, UUDECODE, VT100, AUX,
SHELL, ECSK and the 1.3 preferences and printer driver all on the same disk
that boots into VD0: leaving me with 2 free floppys to run something like
Professional Page.
Dick ( still using 1.2 )
|
1795.2 | Totally RAD! | ANT::SMCAFEE | Steve McAfee | Fri Oct 21 1988 11:07 | 10 |
|
It wasn't so difficult getting RAD to autoboot. I'm not sure what
my problem was the first night. Anyhow, I seem to have RAD: and
VD0: both working no problem. Not having a hard disk it does seem
strange to see the machine booting itself from memory. Are there
any other personal computers that are capable of this?
regards,
steve
|
1795.3 | Byte Humor | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Fri Oct 21 1988 18:43 | 8 |
| Re: .2
>Not having a hard disk it does seem strange to see the machine booting
>itself from memory. Are there any other personal computers that are
>capable of this?
Jerry Pournelle doesn't know of any other computer that can boot from
its ram disk, and he's the "expert" :-) on all personal computers.
|
1795.4 | | ANT::SMCAFEE | Steve McAfee | Sat Oct 22 1988 20:17 | 13 |
|
Looks like I was speaking hastily again in .2. RAD: and VD0: do seem
to work, but if I then try to use RAM:, the system hangs. Similarly
RAD: and RAM: seem to work as long as I don't touch VD0:. I've tried
looking at the mount list and I'm not sure if there is anything I can
change that would help. I've got RAD: set up to be a full disk (880K)
and VD0: set to 512K. This is a 2.5Meg A1000. Any suggestions as to
what might be going on?
It's amazing how much time can be accumulated trying to come up with
a suitable workbench.
- steve
|
1795.5 | Out of memory? | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Mon Oct 24 1988 16:24 | 11 |
| Re: .4
Sounds to me like you are running out of memory. Try running one of the
little programs that shows a continuous display of the available fast
and chip memory. If either or both go to zero, you've found your problem.
Remember, although RAM: and VD0: only allocate enough memory to hold their
current contents, RAD: uses a fixed amount of memory (the maximum you
specified via the mountlist).
VD0: (and RAM:) can act pretty flaky if they run out of memory.
|
1795.6 | | ANT::SMCAFEE | Steve McAfee | Mon Oct 31 1988 14:53 | 43 |
|
re: 5
I don't seem to be running out of memory. I tried both the memory
program on the extras 1.3 and the avail command. Right up until
the system hangs it seems to have plenty of both FAST and CHIP mem.
I also tried making a boot sequence which just mounts RAD: (if
necessary) and VD0: and then stops. If I then copy a few files
to RAD:, VD0:, and RAM:, the system will hang whenever I try to
access the last one of these. For example:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
setpatch >nil:
mount vd0:
copy sys:disk.info vd0:
assign >nil: rad: exists ; or whatever this command is...
if warn
mount rad:
diskcopy FROM df0: TO rad:
endif
copy sys:disk.info ram: ; system hangs here!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reordering these three things seems to make no difference. It always
hangs when I access the third type of memory.
Has anyone gotten VD0 and RAM and RAD all working simultaneously?
On another note:
Has anyone noticed that echo with NOLINE does not work properly
in a startup-sequence?
Try this one in your startup-sequence:
echo "enter date:" NOLINE
date >nil:
Now put these two lines in a file and EXECUTE the file. Works OK
in the execute file, but in the startup-sequence it does not print
the text until AFTER you enter the date.
- steve mcafee
|
1795.7 | Multiple RAD: devices????? | CSC32::J_PARSONS | Like Lesser Birds on the 4 Winds... | Wed Nov 02 1988 22:39 | 14 |
| Is it possible to have multiple, distinct, RAD: devices?
I have tried everything I can think of to accomplish such a setup
but I can't make the 2nd device be recognized as a different physical
device as the original RAD:.
What I'd like to do is have 2 floppy-sized RAD: devices. I've tried
giving the 2 devices totally different names, and I've tried changing
the unit of the 2nd device from 0 to 1. I've also tried copying
the ramdisk.device (or whatever it is) to another file and using
this new file as the device entry for the 2nd rad: device. None
of these have produced any success.
I'm open for suggestions if anyone has any.
|
1795.8 | This works for me | USRCV1::SORGE | | Sun Nov 06 1988 11:39 | 33 |
| I currently have a Workbench V1.3 working with RAD:, VD0: and RAM:
on an A1000 with 2.5 Meg and one external drive. What I found was that
they must be mounted in the right order and if you use a startup-sequence
with them mounted in the wrong order your system won't work right until
you do a cold reboot. What I have working:
mount RAD:
restore RAD: if required
mount VD0:
dir >NIL: VD0:
makedir RAM:T
assign T: RAM:T
If I reversed the order of mounting VD0: and RAD: everything worked
until I rebooted then the first reference to RAM: would hang up the system.
At that point a "good" startup-sequence wouldn't work unless a cold boot was
done ( this leads you down many a rat hole while troubleshooting ).
One other thing I noticed is that the ASDG-RAMDISK does not seem to
deallocate memory as files are deleted from it, running CleanRamDisk forces
the deallocation. According to the docs it's supposed to deallocate memory
by itself, I never noticed this under V1.2 but I also never ran low on memory
until I added a 880K RAD:.
Regards
Glenn
|
1795.9 | | CSC32::J_PARSONS | Like Lesser Birds on the 4 Winds... | Sun Nov 06 1988 16:40 | 11 |
| re .1
Thanks for the information. I'm not having any trouble using each
of the 3 memory resident devices (RAD:, VD0:, and RAM:) but I am
curious as to how to set up 2 880K RAD: devices. Maybe this isn't
possible but I've seen indications on usenet that would tend to
indicate that it is possible. I can't figure out how to modify the
mountlist to create 2 identically sized rad: devices.
I'd deeply appreciate any further suggestions from anyone who might
have tried this.
|
1795.10 | VD0: used delayed memory deallocation | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Mon Nov 07 1988 17:15 | 13 |
| Re: .8
> One other thing I noticed is that the ASDG-RAMDISK does not seem to
>deallocate memory as files are deleted from it, running CleanRamDisk forces
>the deallocation.
The ASDG-RAMDISK deallocates memory after some number (100?) of I/O
operations go by. The disk assumes that are going to copy more files
to the disk, and waits to see what the next I/O operations to VD0:
do before freeing the unused space.
CleanRamDisk just forces the cleanup to happen immediately instead
of being delayed.
|