T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1693.1 | ray tracing is too hard to be PD | ANT::JANZEN | Tom LMO2/O23 296-5421 | Fri Sep 16 1988 16:08 | 3 |
| what's dbrend?
the old forms in flight was $62, but no ray-tracing. see my review
Tom
|
1693.2 | some answers... | NAC::PLOUFF | Beautiful downtown Littleton | Fri Sep 16 1988 16:47 | 32 |
| Public domain and shareware rendering tools:
For DBW_Render, v2.0, see note 1054. Version 1.something has appeared
on a few users' group disks but may be hard to find.
For A-render, see note 1135. This is available online, but (my
opinion) isn't all that good.
Public domain CAD: see note 1570.10 for mCAD v2.0. Note 1570.*
describes some of the tools needed to work with archived files found
around the Easynet, and with files from the Usenet Amiga newsgroups.
Using the resources of the notesfile:
I guess that every so often this needs to be said. The answers
to some of your questions could be found by using the command
dir/title="something likely"
while in this notesfile. Substitute likely words between the quotes.
Often it will take you a few tries, and sometimes the information
you need is under a misleading title. For instance, dir/title="fish"
shows that note 1156 contains a complete listing of Fred Fish disks.
These can be extracted, then a text editor can be used to find
descriptions of stuff you are interested in.
Don't let the above stop you, or anyone, from asking questions. Both
the Amiga and this notesfile can be confusing to a newcomer. But
the tools we have will often get you some answers very quickly.
Wes Plouff
Old-timer at 1.1 years ownership
|
1693.3 | | STC::HEFFELFINGER | Give my body to science fiction. | Sat Sep 17 1988 01:21 | 14 |
| Re A-render:
I concur with Wes' opinion. I spend a Saturday trying to get the
hang of it and it seems to delight in throwing roadblocks in your
path the whole way. I found it *very* frustrating to use.
I have no experience with DBW_Render but have heard nothing but
good.
My only real experience with ray tracing is with Sculpt 3D, which
is a commercial package. A friend lent it to me for a few weeks
to evaluate it, and compared to A-render, it is a dream.
Gary
|
1693.4 | My advice? Buy Sculpt-3D or Turbo Silver | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Sat Sep 17 1988 07:48 | 19 |
|
QRT (Quick Ray Tracer) is available on PLINK, and apparently can
render a decent image. Sorry, I've never downloaded it, so I have
no firsthand experience.
Bear in mind that unless you can easily visualize objects in an
XYZ coordinate system and have good spatial comprehension, the PD
or shareware packages may be frustrating or impossible to use, since
you are generally required to describe your geometry via a text
file containing coordinates, textures, light and camera coordinates,
etc.
Commercial packages like Sculpt-3D allow you to 'see' your model as a
wireframe as you create it. Nodes are entered via the mouse in a three
view (top, front and side) layout. For $69 or so, you can save a
lot of frustration. Or you could spend the money on Valium and
struggle with an ASCII geometry description file. :^)
Ed.
|
1693.5 | | WJG::GUINEAU | Just a Window in Time | Mon Sep 19 1988 08:46 | 18 |
|
Sculpt 3D is a real nice package. Drawing in 3D is made EASY!
I just recieved a thing in the mail from Byte by Byte (Sculpt makers).
They are introducing a package called Sculpt Animate 4D (Or SA4D as they called
it). This package sounds fantastic! Many new features, rendering speed
increase, new surfaces (metal for one) etc.
Deal is ~$500.00 or ~$200.00 with Sculpt-Animate 3D trade in.
(Above from memory so may be lacking). If anyone want's more detail, let me
know and I'll bring the letter in and highlight from it.
John
|
1693.6 | forms in flight | ANT::JANZEN | Tom LMO2/O23 296-5421 | Mon Sep 19 1988 09:36 | 4 |
| forms in flight lets you see things as you go, draw freehand, or
specify coordinates.
no scripts.
Tom
|