T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1586.1 | "Federal Computing" scooped by "Compute!" | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Wed Aug 10 1988 12:45 | 22 |
| Re: .0
While doing some late night (3am) grocery shopping, I saw one of those
"lesser" computer magazines like Compute! has an interview with Max Toy,
Commodore president. So, I looked over the article (2 pages) as my milk
warmed up to room temperature.
I remember he commented on the success that they were having selling
into the business market and mentioned that they had some some machines
to the Department of Defense, SDI, or NORAD, or someone like that.
> The computer, with a 32-bit Motorola 68030 chip as its
> CPU, ...
And I thought those ads for CSA's 030 board were vapor.
> ... had a sophisticated multitasking operating system that
> could run 20 simultaneous tasks......
Typical poor journalism. I've have more than 20 tasks running on my
Amiga.
|
1586.2 | beat me to it | ANT::JANZEN | Tom 296-5421 LMO2/O23 | Wed Aug 10 1988 12:55 | 11 |
| Yeah, I'm sorry, I saw that article about the sdi theft last week
and forgot to post it.
The office from which the amiga was taken (with missile simulation
s/w on it) is under the escalator from the subway (red/yellow lines)
up to the pentagon front door (all enclosed) entrance.
I need an escort to get in, and all I did was eat in the cafeteria,
which is near the front.
Makes me wonder how safe it is in there.
Tom
|
1586.3 | 20=limit on active CLIs | LEDS::ACCIARDI | I Blit, therefore I am... | Wed Aug 10 1988 13:44 | 8 |
|
re: .1
I think you can only have 20 CLIs active at once, although the author
certainly didn't understand that.
SYSMON tells me that I have 17 tasks running before Workbench is
even loaded.
|
1586.4 | USENET working ?? | PUERTO::ALVAREZ | Miguel,from sunny Puerto Rico | Wed Aug 10 1988 15:59 | 18 |
| > < Note 1586.0 by LEDS::ACCIARDI "I Blit, therefore I am..." >
> -< Amigas and SDI?? >-
>
>
> FROM USENET....
Sorry, this doesn't have to do with the topic, but how did you
get USENET ? ( I believe from comp.sys.amiga ??). I haven't received
anything from comp.sys.amiga for the past two weeks (except for
about 500 lines last week).
I checked the AMIGA_USENET and AMIGA_TECH VAXnotes conferences
and they are in the same situation, so I thought this was a "DEC-wide"
problem.
Anybody has additional information ???
Miguel A. Alvarez
|
1586.5 | Plink pulls through again | LEDS::ACCIARDI | I Blit, therefore I am... | Wed Aug 10 1988 16:09 | 9 |
|
Heh heh... I cheated; I got this particular item from Plink.
Plink always posts comp.sys.amiga and comp.amiga.tech, but whenever
a particularly hot item arrives, the sysop posts it directly in
the message base, which I read every day.
Ed.
|
1586.6 | 20 processes isn't very high on an amiga | VIDEO::LEIBOW | Michael Leibow | Wed Aug 10 1988 22:35 | 3 |
| I've got 20 processes running right now on my Amiga and the
"performance monitor" still shows idle time.
|
1586.7 | 50 tasks or more | NEXUS::D_WHITE | Uncle Dave | Sun Aug 14 1988 23:56 | 20 |
| About 3 years ago (has it been THAT long?) I was writing a term
paper for a Computer Science class. Basically, I was doing some
research to decide whether or not I wanted to get an Amiga (actually,
that's not quite accurate -- I had already made up my mind; I just
needed some ammunition to justify it since there were already 2
other computers in the household at the time!) Anyway, I don't
remember the source, and I can't even find a copy of my paper, but
there was a little gem about Amiga multi-tasking I read that blew
me away. It was something to the effect that Commodore engineers
were trying to test how many simultaneous tasks they could get going
on the Amiga. The gist of it was that they opened about 50 windows
(using the little graphics demos that come on Workbench, I believe).
Apparently, the Amiga was humming along just fine, but the engineers
lost track of how many windows they had open!
I suspect that the number of tasks you can run at once also depends
on WHAT the tasks are. It is soooo nice having a computer which
doesn't have to handle ho-hum housekeeping chores. This leaves
it almost entirely free to kick butt when faced with a truly compute-
bound task...
|