T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1010.1 | | SQM::WATERS | Learning to Fly | Wed Jan 06 1988 15:12 | 3 |
| No interest eh? Hey, that's cool,
Can anyone spot the 3 10s in this note number?
|
1010.2 | | WJG::GUINEAU | W. John Guineau, RD Buyout engineering | Wed Jan 06 1988 15:27 | 14 |
| > < Note 1010.1 by SQM::WATERS "Learning to Fly" >
^ ^
1 2
> No interest eh? Hey, that's cool,
> Can anyone spot the 3 10s in this note number?
^
3
:-)
|
1010.3 | | PLDVAX::SMCAFEE | Steve McAfee | Wed Jan 06 1988 15:33 | 1 |
| Also 1010 is ten base 2.
|
1010.4 | But...but... | SOFTY::HEFFELFINGER | Give my body to science fiction. | Wed Jan 06 1988 23:39 | 8 |
| Re .1
On the contrary, I'm quite interested. Both for the fractals and
the M2 code. I just haven't found the time for pulling that 400+
block file. Thanks for making it available. I will look at it
Real Soon Now.
Gary
|
1010.5 | Communication windows | SQM::WATERS | Learning to Fly | Thu Jan 07 1988 08:27 | 9 |
| .3 is what I was looking for.
I'm getting ready to start on my next Modula-II project; I'm going
to write a communications procedure for the Amiga that implements
the TDSMP protocol (you know, like WACK on the Atari). I've looked
at the ideas in this conference and am planning on to writing
a general routine that can be called by any existing communications
program (like the excellent VT200 program). Is anyone currently
working on or considering such a project?
|
1010.6 | "Whack", not "Wack" | PRNSYS::LOMICKAJ | Jeff Lomicka | Thu Jan 07 1988 10:44 | 4 |
| 'tis about time.
It's spelled "Whack" not "Wack". I've seen it spelled wrong a lot lately,
so I'm trying to stamp out the error.
|
1010.7 | does that imply...? | CIMNET::KYZIVAT | Paul Kyzivat | Thu Jan 07 1988 16:55 | 7 |
| re .5:
I don't know much of anything about TDSMP or WHACK. Would what you propose
make it possible for VT200 to run kermit while simultaneously supporting an
interactive session? That would be the greatest thing since sliced bread!
Paul
|
1010.8 | Yesm that's the idea | PRNSYS::LOMICKAJ | Jeff Lomicka | Thu Jan 07 1988 17:27 | 15 |
| That's the intention, yes, but my experience (on the ST) has been that
interactive performance of one session is rotten when downloading in another
session, because all those bits hog the wire. Uploading and reading notes at
the same time isn't bad, since most of the traffic is in opposite directions,
and threfere doesn't interfere as bad. Keystroke handling can be dealyed
somewhat in this case, making editing difficult.
Reading three or four distant notesfiles at once is no sweat!
Doing two file transfers at once takes more than twice as long than doing
one at a time.
These impressions are from using Whack's internal file transfer protocol, which
streams data with no ACK messages. Kermit behavior may be substantially
different, and I look forward to hearing about it.
|