T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
980.1 | PROdrive works like a champ | SIMUL8::STOLLER | Voice, Catch The Wave | Wed Dec 16 1987 10:51 | 11 |
| Yes, I have a PROdrive. I find it quieter. I do not hear it but
I do hear the internal drive. Abel sent me mine. The smaller size
is what sold me. Its tiny. Also, I agree, not needing to hold
it to put in the disk is nice.
Also, I have limited desk space and am thinking of placing it on
top of my power supply. Anyone out there think this is du... not
a good idea? It fits and won't slide off. how about putting the
both of them on top of the monitor, nah... too hot. There are
obviously other possibilities, like putting up a shelf, but this
is much simpler for the short term.
|
980.2 | | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Wed Dec 16 1987 11:24 | 11 |
| Y'know, for $29, Radio Shack sells a nice monitor stand for their
Model 1000 machine that fits the A500 like a glove.
The stand uses two U-shaped steel brackets to support a platform.
The CPU slides in right under the platform. The whole thing is
abuout the same color as the A500, too.
The Software Shop has one set up with their A500. It looks real
clean, and has enough room on the platform to hold the monitor,
and a floppy or hard drive.
|
980.3 | Don't do it! | WJG::GUINEAU | W. John Guineau III | Wed Dec 16 1987 11:27 | 7 |
|
I wouldn't put it on the power supply. Any sufficiently strong stray magnetic
fields can do serious damage to data on floppies (or hard disks for that matter)
I don't even feel safe leaving boxes of floppies within 6-8 inches of
the supply or power cord - but then I may be paranoid too.
|
980.4 | Pro for Pro - little quid | CSSE::WARD | | Wed Dec 16 1987 16:09 | 6 |
| I recently purchased a PRODRIVE and Panasonic 1901i after buying
WordPerfect. Solid as a rock. [I layed mine on its side - sandwiched
between the CPU and Printer]
Any other suggestions on furniture? Any monitor stands table
attachments (like a lamp arm) to free-up the CPU top surface?
|
980.5 | | WJG::GUINEAU | W. John Guineau III | Wed Dec 16 1987 16:38 | 7 |
|
I don't know, but the Radio Shack one sounds pretty good to me (Ala Ed!)
God, I hope it dosen't say *Tandy* on it!!! :-)
John
|
980.6 | $$ | DICKNS::MACDONALD | WA1OMM Listening 224.28 | Wed Dec 16 1987 17:15 | 1 |
| So how much is it?
|
980.7 | $ | WJG::GUINEAU | W. John Guineau III | Thu Dec 17 1987 08:07 | 6 |
|
I paid $199 for mine, but I've seen them mail order for $189
I've seen the Commodore drive for $225 to $275
|
980.8 | Abel $179 | SIMUL8::STOLLER | Voice, Catch The Wave | Thu Dec 17 1987 10:05 | 2 |
| I paid $179 from Abel. Call between 9-10PM and you get through
first time every time. At least you did about 45 days ago.
|
980.9 | Quick Performance comparison | WJG::GUINEAU | W. John Guineau III | Wed Dec 23 1987 09:01 | 33 |
|
Last night I decided to do some real quick measurements between internal
and ProDrive.
I simply formatted a disk, inserted it into DF1: and then copied
all my RAM:C commands to DF1: and timed it. Repeat for internal
drive. DIR command loaded from RAM:C both cases.
Simple results:
DF1 (ProDrive) ~47 seconds
DF0 (internal) ~32 seconds
Then I did the AddBuffers DF1: 40 (as was done in s/Startup-Sequence for
DF0) and repeated the same test (BTW, I deleted all files on the scratch
disk before each copy)
DF1 ~31 seconds
DF0 ~32 seconds
So AddBuffers definetly makes sense! All who have the external drive
should remember to AddBuffers to DF1: in Startup-Sequence.
These are very crude measurements but shows that Buffers make a difference
and that the ProDrive is comparable to the internal floppy drive.
I'd like to get a real performance eval tool (AutoTest?) and try
different buffer sizes and such...
John (whos hoping to see AutoTest magically appear!)
|