T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
875.1 | Overscan any problem? | MEMORY::BERKSON | What's that in the road - a head? | Thu Nov 05 1987 12:36 | 4 |
| More info if you can get it: Will the de-interlacer have any problem
in overscan mode?
mitch
|
875.2 | | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Thu Nov 05 1987 14:37 | 13 |
| re: overscan support...
I'm not sure if it supports it or not, but I'll try to find out.
I am puzzled though; I'd assume you'd want full overscan for recording
a full screen to a VCR. In this case, you'd want to use interlace
to be compatible with NTSC.
Actually, I don't think it's possible to change the display parameters
on a single scan line, other than color. In other words, you can't
go from hi res to lo res or change interlace on a single line.
Ed.
|
875.3 | | MEMORY::BERKSON | What's that in the road - a head? | Thu Nov 05 1987 16:02 | 9 |
| I may be far afield on this. Aren't there some programs - especially
games that use overscan?
It seems like it would be a major pain for the card to support it
since if it supported up to 640x400, the frame fits within 256K.
But if it supports overscan it would need a significant amount more
hardware.
mitch
|
875.4 | Dynamic Resolution Switching | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Mon Nov 09 1987 06:06 | 15 |
| Re: .2
> Actually, I don't think it's possible to change the display parameters
> on a single scan line, other than color. In other words, you can't
> go from hi res to lo res or change interlace on a single line.
Sure you can. The Copper can change the horizontal and vertical resolution
on every scan line. Haven't you ever pulled down a Deluxe Paint low res
screen to see the medium res workbench screen underneath? For that to
work, the Copper has to support switching from 640 wide to 320 wide res
on the fly. It is true that putting any interlace screen on the physical
display will cause the entire physical display to go into interlace. But,
even in this mode the copper is displaying non-interlace screens in their
normal 200 line high resolution by displaying each non-interlaced scan
line twice.
|
875.5 | ... | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Mon Nov 09 1987 08:26 | 20 |
| Sure, I knew that... what I meant was that a given screen may have only
one resolution at a time. You couldn't have a screen with a hi-res window
right next to a lo-res window on the same screen.
In answer to the original question, I've seen a brochure at the
Software Shop for the de-interlacer. It claims a resolution of
670 x 444 or something like that, which I believe are the overscan
dimensions.
While at the Software Shop, Moe gave me a quick dump on Comdex,
which he visited. He saw an A2000 running Professional Page on
a large mono monitor with the de-interlacer installed. He claimed
the display was incredible, as good as any of the Mac large displays.
These new toys are a good thing, but clearly out of the price range
of the average home user. Maybe some clever hacker will come out
with a lower priced de-interlacer for us poor A1000 owners...
Ed.
|