T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
710.1 | ... | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Thu Sep 17 1987 09:50 | 46 |
| The Amiga has many different graphics modes...
320 x 200 w/32 colors out of 4096
320 x 400 w/32 " " "
640 x 200 w/16 " " "
640 x 400 w/16 " " "
32 color modes are achieved by the use of 5 bit-planes, and 16 colors
require 4 bit-planes. The programmer has the option of using as
little as one bit-plane if he likes.
The Amiga display hardware is capable of 6 bit-planes, which is
required for Hold-and-Modify mode. In HAM mode, all 4096 colors are
displayed on screen at once. If you've ever seen any Digi-View
images, you'll see that they are of near-photographic quality.
All Amiga models currently have the same graphics capabilities,
with the exception that the A500 and A2000 have a monochrome composite
output, versus the color composite of the A1000. The monochrome
composite of the A500 is intended to allow 16 grey scales on an
inexpensive monochrome composite monitor.
The 512K of ram that comes installed in the A500 is CHIP ram, in
that the custom graphics and sound chips can only access data that
reside in the lower 512K. Memory from 512K to 2 megs is reserved
for future enhanced graphics chips. Memory from 2 megs to 8 megs
is reserved for autoconfiguring FAST expansion ram. The 1 meg A500
actually uses ram that is not truly FAST, in that it resides on
the custom chip buss. This means that if an application uses lots
of pixels or bit planes, there may be some slowdown due to contention
between the custom chips and the program code for clock cycles.
This slowdown is hardly noticeable, and is NEVER greater than the
slowdown experienced by an unexpanded 512K Amiga.
Real FAST ram can be added to the A500 through the expansion buss,
just like on the A1000. When FAST ram is added, the application
automatically loads program code into FAST ram, and graphics code
into CHIP ram. In this case, the AMiga will always run at maximum
speed, regardless of how intensive the graphics may be.
Early in the life of the Amiga, many detractors, most notably the
Trameils of Atari, made a big deal over contention problems in the
Amiga. All their claims were wildly exaggerated. In fact, in any
of the graphics modes that the ST allows, there is no slowdown even
on an unexpanded machine.
|
710.2 | A few clarifications.... | WHYVAX::KRUGER | | Thu Sep 17 1987 12:37 | 25 |
| There were a few misleading statements made in [.1]
First, the number of colors represents the MAXIMUM # of bits planes
permissible for each resolution. One of the better features of the
Amiga is allowing you to have fewer bit planes if you don't need
all that color. This means that if you only need 4 colors in the
standard workbench type screen, you use 1/2 the memory (2 bits per
pixel instead of 4) and there is NO bandwidth contention -- ie,
the processor is never blocked by the video. A HAM mode picture
or 640 x 16 colors (whether interlaced or not) will require so much
bus bandwidth for screen updating that the processor will really
only get to touch CHIP RAM during horizontal and vertical blanking.
Of course, that's the nice thing about fast RAM -- since video doesn't
have access to all of memory, FAST RAM is always fast no matter
how loaded the video.
Another mistake: 8M is allocated fast RAM. The 1M is located at
C0000000. However, the largest autoconfigurable device is 6M, so
if you have an 8M board, it has to autoconfig as 6M and 2M. That's
probably what caused the confusion.
See the note I posted on sharing PD software!
Thanks,
dov
|
710.3 | huh? | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Thu Sep 17 1987 14:00 | 8 |
| Sorry if I misled anyone in .1; I thought I said that the application
could use as little as one bit plane in any screen res.
Also, I dont have an Amiga memory map nearby; I believe that the
WCS or system rom resides at the very top 256K of the addressable 16
megs, and that the top 1 meg is reserved for future, larger roms.
What is reserved for the space from 15 megs on down? (Sorry,
I don't speak hex).
|
710.4 | Some more questions... | LNZIS1::TECHNIKER | | Fri Sep 18 1987 03:45 | 15 |
| First,I want to thank you that you answered my questions .
I got much information out of your replies.Perhaps I will buy an
Amiga-500.But I have another question :
What can be connected to the A500 ? I have a 5 1/4" disk-drive
( 48 tpi ).Is it possible to plug it into the disk-connector at
the back of the computer? Or can just 3 1/2" disk's be connected?
Or must I buy an external diskcontroller first ?
Some Notes ago I read about replacing the 68000 by the 68010.
Is this possible in the A500 too?
Thanks,
Peter
|
710.5 | ... | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Fri Sep 18 1987 08:46 | 22 |
| Not only is is possible to directly plug in a 68010, but CSA and
Gemstone are both shipping cards that have a 68020/68881 chipset
installed. The 68020/68881 cards go for around $750 fully loaded.
These cards use the Amiga's 7.14 MHz clock, but more expensive versions
are available that use a 14.28 MHz clock and are socketed for 32
bit ram chips.
Surprisingly, all these boards will fit right inside of the A500,
also. Didn't think there'd be that much room in there.
I've been using a 68010 for about 9 months in an A1000. There are
only three titles that I know of that don't like the 68010;
Transformer, Barbarian, and TextCraft Plus. There is a simple PD
patch called 'decigel' that invokes some sort of trap for the illegal
instruction that these naughty programs use.
The speedup that the 68010 provides isn't very noticable, maybe
5-8%. Some things the 68010 does very quickly, like moving data
from FAST to CHIP ram. Somethink like 50% faster. For $20 and
a half hour of your labor, the 68010 is a pretty cheap way to get
a bit more speed.
|
710.6 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Fri Sep 18 1987 14:46 | 13 |
| RE: .4
yes, you can plug in a 5 1/4" disk-drive. A couple magazines have
published articles describing how to do it. Commodore also sells
an external 5 1/4" drive, primarily for use with the Transformer,
but it can be used under AmigaDOS as a, i think, 440K disk. Needs
to be able to do more TPI to be a 880K disk.
A second 3 1/2" disk is more useful. You can daisy chain your
5 1/4" disk from it. The disk controller in the computer can
handle up to 4 disk drives.
-dave
|
710.7 | drives, '020s. etc. | 16BITS::KRUGER | | Fri Sep 18 1987 15:33 | 19 |
| re .4
The only difference between the 5.25" and the 3.5" electrical signals
is that the 3.5" expects one signal latched. One chip, and about
5 connections does it. You will need a power supply though. The
A-500 power supply is VERY weak, and I wouldn't recommend even boards
sucking power, let alone a floppy.
Incidentally, there is a lot of room in the 500. I saw the guts
6 months ago when some Commodore engineers proudly showed it at
a club meeting in JAUG (Perry Kivolovitz, et al) The parts count
has been reduced to 5+RAM. If you've ever looked at the inside of
the 1000, you've got to appreciate that. I'm positive the machine
is more reliable. Anyway, there is almost nothing in the box, but
the closed space and comparative lack of ventilation (no fan) would
have me worrying about putting in 32 DRAMS and a hairdrier 68020-68881
combination. Those suckers RADIATE! :-) Plus, where would the power
come from? I'd think you have to get a new power supply with it.
dov
|
710.8 | quad density 5.25" | 16BITS::KRUGER | | Fri Sep 18 1987 15:36 | 3 |
| If you get a 720K 5.25" drive (comparatively cheap)
that can go one-for-one with the 3.5" ie -- IBM is conservative,
and the Amiga is not -- it will put 880K on it instead of 720K.
|
710.9 | about three chips | NAC::VISSER | | Fri Sep 18 1987 15:46 | 3 |
| re: .7 its more than one chip; the schematic is in the
schematic/expansion docs available from CBM.
John
|
710.10 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Fri Sep 18 1987 16:48 | 8 |
| re: .7
i've heard one of the "advantages" of the A500 design is the power
brick - you can upgrade your power supply without having to open
the computer. Don't know of anybody offering a bigger power
supply for the A500 currently.
-dave
|
710.11 | Autoconfigure and the Memory Map | TLE::RMEYERS | Randy Meyers | Sun Sep 20 1987 11:55 | 39 |
| Re: .2
> Another mistake: 8M is allocated fast RAM. The 1M is located at
> C0000000. However, the largest autoconfigurable device is 6M, so
> if you have an 8M board, it has to autoconfig as 6M and 2M. That's
> probably what caused the confusion.
You are incorrect about there being no support for 8 meg autoconfigure.
The memory sizes supported by the Amiga Expansion Architecture are: 64k,
128k, 256k, 512k, 1M, 2M, 4M, 8M. (This information is taken straight from
page 5 of the "Amiga Expansion Architecture" paper in Commodore's book
"Schematics and Expansion Specifications.")
Note that there is no support for 6 Meg expansion devices. The 8 Meg card
from ASDG does support a 6 Meg configuration by way of the mechanism you
described: it configures as a 4 Meg board and another 2 Meg board.
The Amiga memory map (minus uninteresting device assignments and holes) is:
Addresses (size) "Commodore's comments." My comments
------------- ------- ------------------------------------------------
000000-07FFFF (512k) "Chip memory"
080000-1FFFFF (1.75M) "Do not use" The Amiga 500 and 2000 stick their
other half of meg of memory here. The Insider
type boards live here as well. Everyone knows
that all of this memory area will be chip memory
someday.
200000-9FFFFF (8M) "Fast Memory" This is the normal expansion memory
that Amiga 1000 owners have been sticking on their
machines.
A00000-BEFFFF "Do not use"
C00000-DFEFFF (2M-4k) "Reserved for Future use" However, the Byte by
Byte Pal Jr. stuck its 1 Meg of memory here. I
believe that the 32 bit wide memory from CSA
goes here as well.
|