T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
375.1 | | BAGELS::BRANNON | Dave Brannon | Fri Mar 13 1987 13:29 | 12 |
| How was the game while it lasted - was it Amigaitized or a straight
port?
I thought software couldn't change the WCS unless you did some hardware
hacking to disable the latch. I suspect the engineer may be wrong,
since that kind of protection scheme would die horribly on the
500/2000's Kickstart ROM.
Either the disk duplicator was having a bad day, or Microprose really
ruined the market for Amiga Silent Service.
-dave
|
375.2 | ... | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Fri Mar 13 1987 15:29 | 10 |
| The game was great, while it lasted... definately Amiga-ized, with
digitized pinging, ship wrecks, etc. Excellent graphics. I have
not seen the ST version, so I can't really say if they enhanced
the graphics at all.
Maybe I mis-understood the CBM guy... He said 'Microprose must have
patched the OS', by which I assumed he meant WCS. Maybe they just
mucked with the disk.device or whatever it is that shouldn't be
mucked with...
|
375.3 | Fix on the way... | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Fri Mar 13 1987 18:45 | 10 |
| Well, I just received a new copy of Silent Service from the Memory
Location. Don told me that virtually every version that went out
came back in. Apparently, when a mission has ended, and you add
your name to the Naval Hall of Fame, the write process zaps the
copy-protected tracks. Microprose is aware of the problem, and
certainly does not wish to alienate the lucrative Amiga market,
and will be issuing a revision in a few weeks or so.
In the meantime, leaving the disk write-protected will prevent any
problems.
|
375.4 | Talk about a stupid copy protection scheme | MQFSV2::DESROSIERS | Tout est possible | Fri Jul 15 1988 13:30 | 17 |
| I didn't want to start a new note and the title of this one seemed
quite appropriate, so here goes:
I was in an Amiga computer store a few days ago when a new Amy 500
owner came in complaining that his workbench was no longer working,
it turned out that he had been playing a game (don't remember which
or who made it) and after resetting the machine, when he got tired
of the game, he put back his WB disk to reeboot and got nowhere.
The instructions in the game said to TURN OFF the Amiga after finishing
up, if this was not done, a "virus" stowed in memory erases all
other disks put in. Mind you all was said was to turn off the
computer, no mention was made that other disks would be eaten up!
Jean
Good thing I don't play games
|
375.5 | ? | 29945::KIP | No Dukes. | Fri Jul 15 1988 13:49 | 1 |
| Which game was this?
|
375.6 | | STAR::BANKS | In Search of Mediocrity | Fri Jul 15 1988 15:34 | 6 |
| The copy of Zoom! I bought had a warning on it stating that it was
a good idea to cycle power before and after using the game, to avoid
propogation of viruses, but the text seemed more like a warning
about "safe booting" more than any sort of implicit threat.
Perhaps the guy just misunderstood the intent?
|
375.7 | Hmm? | HAZEL::MELLITZ | | Wed Jul 20 1988 08:50 | 2 |
| Wonder what damages they'ed be liable for knowningly selling a product
that may destroy data they do not own?
|
375.8 | | MQFSV2::DESROSIERS | Tout est possible | Wed Jul 20 1988 10:40 | 31 |
| Il'l try to go back to the store so that I can find out what the
name of the stupid program.
Re -.1 The suewer (herefore reffered as the person whose data was
erased) would have as mutch chance of getting reparation as software
companies who get zip from pirated copies of thier software. All
in all an ugly scene.
On copy protection: If software companies would sell the software
at reasonnable prices, they would sell more, just look at what we
are doing, the first computers DEC sold were quite expensive, but
as developpement costs were absorbed, the price for a given performance
level went down. Sinclair's ZX80 originally sold for $200, but
as more units were sold, the price went lower than $30 (for the
ZX81). These are market laws, they hold up for hardware, milk,
you name it....EXCEPT software! I can understand that the software
designer expects a certain market penetration, but after it is
attained, the price SHOULD drop, these people think that after the
goal is reached, the rest is gravy, the fact is that after the goal
is reached, the pirates take over. If you don't play by the rules,
you get your just deserves.
If you think that the time and effort put in by software designers
deserves sutch high prices, wonder at the time and effort put in
by authors of BOOKS (novels, non-fiction...) they don't command
the same high prices, why?
enough ramblings
Jean
|
375.9 | books sell more copies | JFRSON::OSBORNE | Blade Walker | Wed Jul 20 1988 16:03 | 16 |
| > wonder at the time and effort put in
> by authors of BOOKS (novels, non-fiction...) they don't command
> the same high prices, why?
Many more copies are sold, in the case of popular books. There are no
hardware requirements, and the majority of popular books do not become
obsolete in 2 years. Competition between publishers is tougher in terms
of numbers of new items available, and all items are available to anyone,
not just those with specific hardware. Technical books, which have small
audiences and require revisions to stay competitive, have prices comparable
to PC software. Software manufacturing (duplicating) is more expensive.
Now, if you write something of which every Amiga owner will buy 4 copies...
And keep the movie rights... :^) And the serial rights, ala Zork I...
JO
|
375.10 | | MQFSV2::DESROSIERS | Tout est possible | Thu Jul 21 1988 10:02 | 15 |
| Re -.1
Not quite true, I live in the province of Quebec, which is the
french speaking part of Canada. Many people write novels in french
just for our market, sometimes, if the subject is VERY popular,
it will make it international to all french speaking countries and
then it will be translated to other languages, even then the
penetration (number of copies sold) is smaller than the number of
copies of popular software sold in the US of A. How many copies
of lotus-123 have been sold? does it still command what they are
asking for it? same for dBase*...just to mention productive "tools".
Jean
|
375.11 | Microdeal | MQFSV2::DESROSIERS | Tout est possible | Wed Aug 17 1988 16:59 | 5 |
| The idiots making the stupid copy protection I described in .4 are
the good folks from MICRODEAL.
Jean
|