T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
19.1 | VR241 anyone? | NUHAVN::MELLITZ | | Tue May 13 1986 09:06 | 4 |
| On the same line ... Has anyone tried to hook up a VR241 to an AMIGA.
There VR241 is *analog* RGB. How do you set this up on a AMIGA?
... Rich
|
19.2 | | DSSDEV::SAUTER | John Sauter | Wed Jan 04 1978 10:00 | 3 |
| Doesn't the Amiga normally use an analog monitor? You can't get
more than 16 colors using digital RGB.
John Sauter
|
19.3 | twice the bandwidth helps | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Wed May 14 1986 11:36 | 8 |
| Having used both a 1080 and the Amiga and VR241 on a VT240, the
VR241's the handsdown winner. Of course, the 241's got a 20MHz
bandwidth to the 1080's 10MHz, and it costs a bit more. If anybody
can figure out how to hook it up, I'd seriously consider getting
one via the DEPP. Anybody got a price list handy?
len.
|
19.4 | An alternative | HYSTER::DEARBORN | | Wed May 14 1986 12:37 | 9 |
| Here's something you might try: I saw a note on Compuserve about
using an Atari color monitor (the kind used with the ST series,
now available for about $330. at Toys-R-Us as a separate item) with
the Amiga. They noted that the colors are more saturated than with
the 1080 monitor, and it costs less. (I'm sure that the Atari fans
will cringe at the idea--Amiga users seem a little more open minded.)
Might be worth a try.
|
19.5 | | HIGHFI::MICKOL | Videographer | Wed May 14 1986 14:54 | 1 |
| Current (May 86) Employee Purchase price list has the VR241-AA for $517.00.
|
19.6 | Heavy Weight | AUTHOR::MACDONALD | | Thu May 15 1986 10:19 | 5 |
| I have used the VR241 with a VCR and it puts even the best color
TV's to shame. It does weigh a ton and a half though. Are there
specs on the Amiga system box that show maximum load?
Paul
|
19.7 | Cable Wars | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Thu May 15 1986 10:57 | 12 |
| Hmm... then there's the cable problem. From what I understand the
Atari monitors use a bizarre DIN-style connector that's hard to
find. The VR241 expects three BNC connectors. Anybody into custom
cables.
The 241's a little on the pricey side, but it sure would be nice.
I've also heard that the Atari monitor looks better than the 1080.
I guess I'll have to start thinking of my 1080 as a freebie rather
than as part of a $1300 system price.
len.
|
19.8 | Weight spec? | PENNSY::MELLITZ | | Thu May 15 1986 14:05 | 3 |
| re: .6
Off hand do you know if the VR241 exeeds the Amiga weight spec?
... Rich
|
19.9 | Not enough $$$ for RGB | SHOGUN::HEFFEL | Gary Heffelfinger | Fri May 16 1986 01:58 | 10 |
| Please pardon this blasphemous interupt, but while we're on the
subject of monitors.... Has anyone seen how the Amiga performs
with a composite monitor? I have a Commodore 1702 monitor at present,
and I have a much better chance of convincing my wife that we need
an Amiga if we don't have to buy a new (read $500+) monitor. I
realize that perfection can't be expected, but is it a workable
alternative?
On a budget,
Gary
|
19.10 | go for it! | VIKING::BANKS | Dawn Banks | Fri May 16 1986 08:18 | 20 |
| When we bought our AMIGA, we had a rather difficult time finding a DB-23
connector for the RGB monitor, and as a result, we used the composit video
out on our Zenith monitor for about the first month (before we got around
to sawing a couple of pins off a DB-25). While this is the same Zenith
monitor that we're using as an RGB monitor now, I still think it's a fair
comparison to a normal composit monitor, as the composit video is clearly
the limiting factor (and I'd say that either the monitor or the composit
out jack was limiting the resolution to about 4.2 MHz, just like NTSC says).
Anyway, on the Zenith in composit mode, the 80 column font was readable,
if somewhat irritating, but the 60 column font (the default when you first
install the machine) was perfectly acceptable. We used the 80 column font
and put up with the irritation.
For that matter, on the few occasions that we fed the composit video signal
to our RCA TV/Monitor, we got about the same results as with the Zenith
computer monitor.
Overall, I'd say that it's fairly reasonable to use a composit monitor
on the Amiga, although RGB is definitely the way to go if you can afford it.
|
19.11 | Have it YOUR way | HYSTER::DEARBORN | | Fri May 16 1986 09:51 | 13 |
| I used a TV monitor with my Amiga for a few weeks before I got my
RGB one. I found 80 columm type almost impossible to read. Hi-Res
is a joke. You can barely make out the gadgets or fonts. You could
'get by', but what a relief when you eventually go to RGB.
I guess it depends upon how good your monitor is. Even using the
composite mode on my Sony monitor is dissapointing to me.
ALSO: I just noticed a note on the usenet that said that wearing
polarized sunglasses eliminates much of the interlace flicker in
hi-res mode. Sounds like an April fools joke in May, but might
be true.
|
19.12 | free is too expensive? | VAXWRK::PRAETORIUS | 636741600744 | Fri May 16 1986 11:17 | 7 |
| re .9
There's currently a Commodore authorized arrangement whereby you can
get a Commodore 1080 RGB monitor free when you buy a system box. I don't
know when it expires or if any of the local dealers are subscribing, but
it's worth looking into.
RP
|
19.13 | You Have Two More Weeks | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Wed Jan 04 1978 11:17 | 6 |
| re .9/.12
My understanding is that the free monitor promotion runs at least
until the end of May.
len.
|
19.14 | Monitor promo & sunglasses | GLORY::SHIVES | | Fri May 16 1986 23:26 | 18 |
| re .12,.13
The free monitor offer does run until the end of May. Check your
local dealer. This offer is made directly from Commodore, so all
of the dealers should offer it (I would think do unless they are
holding out). Also, you might want to check around a little extra
to see if any particular dealer will give a little extra incentive.
re.11? There was a mention from someone on the Usenet who tried
Polarized sunglasses. While he thought that it was the polarization
that did the trick, a guy from C-A said that he would probably get
the same result by dimming the room lights a little. It basicly
sounds to me that the amount of glare in a room contributes
significantly to the flicker of the monitor. Definitely worth a
try.
Mark
|
19.15 | What I meant was... | SHOGUN::HEFFEL | Gary Heffelfinger | Sat May 17 1986 20:49 | 18 |
| re .12 and others.
My intent in asking about the composite monitor was more or less
to plan for the future. I am not likely to be buying an Amiga in the
next 2 weeks (or months, for that matter). On top of all this,
the 1080 is not really "free". I was working on the (possibly flawed)
assumption that I could find a discounter or dealer somewhere who
would be willing to part with a system unit sans monitor for something
close to the ~$800 that Comm/Amiga is hyping in it's ads. It's
possible I could have connived a deal out of the local dealer.
In any case, I sincerely doubt that it will revert to its $1300
price tag after the current promotion ends. I suspect that It'll
end up under $1000 without the 1080. If that's the case, then I
want to have the option of getting one without its monitor to keep
the cost down.
Thanks for the input,
Gary
|
19.16 | Polaroid glare filter reduces flicker | ALPHA::KOPP | | Mon May 19 1986 17:44 | 9 |
| Re .11 and others, a Polaroid glare filter also materially reduces
flicker in the hi-res, interlaced mode. It also improves contrast
and apparent color saturation. Whether this is due to Polaroid film
or just simple glare reduction isn't clear -- I don't have a big
enough neutral density filter to test it. You don't need sun-glasses
to do the job.
Lowell
|
19.17 | An Update | HYSTER::DEARBORN | | Tue Jun 03 1986 09:56 | 13 |
| re .4
I just read in the current issue of INFO magazine that the Atari
color monitor is NOT recommended for the Amiga. They tested several
different monitors--the Sonys came out on top. The Atari produced
an image with a distorted aspect ratio that most people would find
unacceptable...in fact, the picture even bleeds off the screen at
the sides. In addition, there is the problem of the non-standard
connector to deal with.
Oh well.....
Randy
|
19.18 | re .6 | CLT::MULLEN | | Thu Jun 26 1986 22:01 | 4 |
| I don't think anyone has replied to this... Yes the specs on weight
are there. 50 lbs if I recall.
\dan
|
19.19 | Good Monitor-TV's? | ENDOR::SWONGER | | Mon Jul 21 1986 11:34 | 12 |
|
I'm finally getting around to buying an Amiga (in the next few weeks),
so I'm looking for more up-to-date info on monitor-tvs. Specifically,
which ones have people used and found to work? I know that some
have only 300 lines of resolution and some have 500. There are so
many different brands now (Sony, JVC, Fischer, RCA, Zenith) that
I have no idea which to buy.
Also, any help on where to get a monitor-tv that works with the
Amiga (at a good price) would be appreciated.
Roy
|
19.20 | Sony KV1311CR | HYSTER::DEARBORN | The One to Watch <> | Mon Jul 21 1986 17:02 | 21 |
| Just make sure that the monitor you get is an ANALOG RGB monitor.
A digital RGB monitor will do you little good. I am still very
happy with my Sony KV1311CR Trinitron Monitor/TV. So far, I haven't
seen any other monitor that looks as good, or is as versatile.
It has several different input and output connections. These are
really helpful if you are doing any kind of video graphics work,
because you can use it as a RGB monitor for image creation, and a
Composite monitor for videotape playback.
My only problem with it is that my cable is not fully shielded,
creating havoc with my neighbor's TV (and mine). My first cable
was one of those ribbon ones--a disaster! I now have one from Redmond
Cable, which is better. It still causes some RF problems though.
I bought mine through Crimson Camera Technical Sales in Boston (My
brother was a salesman there at the time). This monitor is discounted
at ComputerTown in Nashua from time to time. It is usually around
$475.00.
Randy
|
19.21 | Amiga HR monitor ?? | LEIA::SWONGER | | Wed Jul 23 1986 10:38 | 15 |
|
As I was looking through my AmigaWorlds yesterday I noticed something
interesting in the AW subscription ad. (That is the ad with the picture
of a monitor displaying a CAD-Type drawing of a person in a car.)
The interesting part of the ad was the monitor itself - it was NOT
an Amiga 1080, but rather an "Amiga HR" monitor. I don't think that
it was a case of a different name for the same monitor, because
the screen looked a little squarer and the control panel on the
bottom looked different. There was also a jack of some sort of the
front.
Does anyone know anything about an "Amiga HR" monitor? Is this perhaps
something that never was produced?
Roy
|
19.22 | Not anything special | HYSTER::DEARBORN | The One to Watch <> | Wed Jul 23 1986 10:59 | 4 |
| I believe that it is the old Amiga monitor. I read somewhere that
they switched suppliers, hence the different 'look'. The performance
is supposed to be unchanged.
|
19.23 | 'Tis True !! | NCCSB::JFISHER | John B. Fisher @NCO (DTN 367-4259) | Wed Jul 23 1986 12:38 | 6 |
| Is true... I have a very early Amiga. (I have not checked it, but
I do not think the Amiga has 'HALFBRITE'...) But the monitor seems
to be very similar to the 1080. It is not the best in the world,
but then with the deal I got, I sure cann't complain...
-- John B. Fisher
|
19.24 | Sony KV-1965S | LEIA::SWONGER | | Fri Jul 25 1986 09:36 | 4 |
| A quick question: does the Sony Trinitron KV-1965S monitor/TV work
with the Amiga? I saw it on sale today for $333.00
Roy
|
19.25 | VR241 not as good as the 1080 | COOKIE::WECKER | Dave (TANSTAAFL) Wecker | Sat Nov 01 1986 15:25 | 33 |
| I just spent last night playing with a VR241 on my Amiga (yes it was
spooky :-), here are the results:
1) The Amiga has a DB-23 connector on the video output so I
had to do some creative hacksawing on a DB-25 until I had
a usable connector.
2) I wired up 4 coax lines (R,G,B and sync) with appropriate
BNC connectors on the ends and wired them to my (erzotz)
DB-23.
3) Hooked up the world. By the way, weight wise the VR241
is not a heck of a lot heavier than the 1080.
4) Worked fine. The cables were good and shielded so virtually
no leakage. The problem was that the picure was TINY due to
the way DEC uses the display surface.
5) Ripped open the VR241 and changed the Horizontal and Vertical
sizes so that the Workbench filled the screen. Adjusted focus
appropriately.
6) I found the VR241 had better focus/general clarity... however
in interlace mode it was almost UNUSABLE. The thing responds
too damn fast (maybe they use a lower persistance
phosper than I'm used to).
7) Bottom line is that I packed it up and am back to using my
good old 1080 (until I can get a high-p phospher at a
resonable price :-)
For what a VR241 costs.. I DEFINITLY would not but one for use on an Amiga.
|
19.26 | Finally got a Sony!!!! | COOKIE::WECKER | Dave (Cum Grano Salis) Wecker | Mon Apr 20 1987 14:52 | 26 |
| Well I finally broke down and bought a Sony KV1311-CR....
Excuse me while I get emotional... I'M IN LOVE!!!! (my wife is even
jealous). I am now running in nothing but interlace mode and after picking
appropriate colors have virtually NO discernible flicker. This is how I would
up getting it: I was helping some neighbors buy an IBM clone (do NOT flame,
this is what they needed :-), when I had a flash of inspiration:
Me: Mr. salesman, would an Amiga 1080 work on this clone?
Mr. S: Yes.
Me: Do you have the cables?
Mr. S: Yes.
Me: Is the 1080 better than the monitor that comes with the clone?
Mr. S: Yes.
Me: Do you sell Sony KV1311-CR's with cables for an Amiga?
Mr. S: Yes.
Me: What would it cost to "upgrade" the clone to a Sony monitor?
Mr. S: About $250.00
Me: Mr. Neighbor, would you like my 1080 monitor (please, please)?
Mr. N: Sure, why not
Me: Mr. Salesman... (the biggie...) is EVERYTHING in stock?
Mr. S: Yep.
So my neighbor bought his system with the Sony, I gave him $250.00 and we
swapped monitors. YAHOOOOOOO!
|
19.27 | Congratulations! | SZOFNA::CBODINE | Every where you go there you are | Mon Apr 20 1987 19:37 | 3 |
| Lucky Duck!
Chris
|
19.28 | ... | LEDS::ACCIARDI | | Tue Apr 21 1987 01:13 | 17 |
| Re: .26
I have installed a Jitter-Rid directly underneath the Sony plastic
bezel. This requires partial disassembly of the Sony. I am not
suicidal, I just have a strong sense of aesthetics.
Anyway, with a Jitter-Rid permanently installed, I can crank up
the sharpness, run in interlaced mode, and get fantastic text quality
without seeing any little black horizontal lines. For colors, I
use light blue text on a black background.
I have no problems at all with flicker on a 400 line screen, with
the exception of black letters on a paper-white background. This
is the color scheme used on ProWrite, with no means to change colors.
By the way Dave, you probably know this, but try dithering the vertical
hold on the Sony for the best shaped characters.
|
19.29 | Sony... Vid out... How good? | HAZEL::MELLITZ | | Tue Apr 21 1987 10:13 | 4 |
| Does the Sony have a composite video out? If so does it produce
a better recording image than the vid out of the Amiga when using a VCR?
... . . Rich
|
19.30 | no | HYSTER::DEARBORN | Trouvez Mieux | Tue Apr 21 1987 12:41 | 7 |
| The sony has a composite out, but it is fed from the composite in,
not by the RGB in. It does not have a composite encoder to translate
the RGB to composite. So in other words, the composite output is
the same as the composite output from the Amiga...or possibly worse.
Randy
|
19.31 | Multi-synch recommendations | SMAUG::SPODARYK | Scaring the pedestrians... | Wed Sep 21 1988 15:18 | 19 |
| <also posted in IBMPC 1565.5>
I am very interested in a Multi-synch monitor for an Amiga.
I have seen the NEC and Sony (1302) and thought they looked very
good. However, I would also like to see the Mitsubishi, Magnavox,
and Princeton models before buying anything.
The local computermarts (Lowell, Nashua) only carry the NEC.
Where could I possibly see several side by side? The Mitsubishi
has been evaluated in IBMPC, but what about the other manufactuers?
Recommendations please, people must be using some of the others also.
Thanks,
--Steve
Yes, I have read *all* the title=monitor/multi/synch here,
in IBMPC and in MAC, and haven't found what I've needed.
|
19.32 | NEC for me. | MQFSV2::DESROSIERS | Tout est possible | Fri Sep 23 1988 12:54 | 8 |
| I just bought a NEC multisyncII, for when the new chip sets are
released. I almost bought a Sony 1302 but from the reviews in
different magazines, the Sony didn't seem to deliver as good a picture.
The distributor I bought the monitor from sold both NEC and Sony
and the service record was not as good on the Sony.
Jean
|
19.33 | You should have tried the Atari ST notes file | PNO::SANDERSB | a belagana | Tue Sep 27 1988 15:46 | 12 |
|
I would suggest you look at May14::ATARIST, Note 137, replies
.7, .9, .11 and .13. Reply .13 is Ed Acciardi's review of his
Princeton Ultrasync.
(No Ed is not an Amiga defector. I asked him to write-up a
review as he has lived with his monitor for some time now and a
monitor like a printer should be transferable to the next system
you own.)
Bob
|