T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
114.1 | | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Mar 06 1991 10:07 | 9 |
| I think St.Peter's is more likely to be a #15 seed, with
Towson State, the NAC champion, the Big Sky champion, and
the Jackson State-Coastal Carolina winner being the likely
#16 seeds. That would pit St.Peter's against either Duke,
UNC, Syracuse, Indiana, Arizona, or Kansas (in all likelihood).
One of the occassional noters in here, Mike Simmons, is a
St.Peter's alum, and has been pointing out to me the last day
how St.Peter's made it and Yale didn't.
|
114.2 | | CBROWN::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Mar 06 1991 11:51 | 10 |
| Wow, you sure have mellowed out, JoJ.
I can't believe I saw you put a "Congrats" in for someone who can't
read this file.
Wonder of wonders!
:*)
lEe
|
114.4 | another heart-rending made for TV rip-off story | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Mar 06 1991 12:17 | 27 |
| While I have nothing against St. Phallus-Member per se, it's a damned
shame that the NCAA in its drive to mollify television's insatiable
appetite for stupid fodder for moving maudlin schmalzy "whoo hoo lookit
some nobodies are being inspirational here!" crapola will end up robbing
more deserving kids of a chance at the Big Show.
St. Phallus-Member, Jersey City, welfare program, stipend, giveaway,
creeping fuzzy-haided liberal-style socialism in the athletic establishment
if these bums wanted to play in the Div. I tourney so much why didn't they
*earn* their way like most other teams.
Yeah, they might beat somebody, just like a crackhaid welfare recipient
might sneak up on a_honest citizen from behind after having arrived on
the rich side a town on a free bus pass and smash poor John Doe in the
back a the haid with a tire iron and rob him and leave him laying their
bleeding, innocent.
I applaud the NCAA's future move to limit automatic berths to undeserving
recipients, to, so to speak, curtail the public spectacle of this awful
type of welfare-mooching.
True, the Princeton's and the Richmond's belong, cuz they PROVE their
mettle during the regular season.
But, St. Phallus-Member? Jersey City. Urban blight. Moochy mooch main!
Big10 Tom
|
114.5 | If ya want the definition of C-H-O-K-E folks, this was it. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Mar 06 1991 12:27 | 8 |
| Surprised you'd be so generous wif Richmond MorT, after they way they
(whilst under the influence of crack no doubt) snuck up on the innocent
Hoosiers a few years backed and bludgeoned them to death!
Haw haw haw!!!!!!!!!!111111
- ACC Chris
|
114.6 | | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Mar 06 1991 12:37 | 8 |
| The only really deserving teams are those who win regular
season conference titles. While I agree that therefore Princeton
is a deserving NCAA tournament team, I can't agree that Richmond
deserves to be there.
Nor should Indiana, UNC, New Mexico State, Texas, LSU, St.John's,
etc.
|
114.7 | | DEMING::MCKAY | | Wed Mar 06 1991 17:52 | 4 |
| back a few
and where did Richmond hand Indiana it's exit papers?
Jimbo
|
114.8 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYou | Thu Mar 07 1991 07:44 | 14 |
| � Yeah, they might beat somebody, just like a crackhaid welfare recipient
� might sneak up on a_honest citizen from behind after having arrived on
� the rich side a town on a free bus pass and smash poor John Doe in the
� back a the haid with a tire iron and rob him and leave him laying their
� bleeding, innocent.
Bad analogy MorT. Think of these scrappy small schools as the guy
who works days then attends night school. Sweating and struggling for that
degree that DockerWearingBugleBoys get from daddy's money. Of course the
spoiled sissies would view the highly motivated energetic gogetter as a
threat. Kind of like how say, Indiana would view say, Towson State as a
threat.
/Don
|
114.9 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Mar 07 1991 10:03 | 13 |
| A couple of great nicknames made the tourney yesterday:
St. Francis (PA) Red Flash
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers
BTW, a chanticleer is a rooster.
Also, Chris Berman had another good one Tuesday night during the
highlights of Towson State's win and automatic entry into the tourney.
One of the Towson State fans was holding up a sign saying "We want
UNLV". Berman replied, "They want UNLV...well, they might get 'em."
Joe
|
114.10 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | | Thu Mar 07 1991 10:09 | 11 |
| Hey Mr. T_otally_absurd, St. Peters has one of the top ranked defenses
in the country. While I agree that they aren't stricken with the slow,
white, undersized MBA forwards that IU has to deal with, they should
provide some interesting entertainment for us made for TV fans.
I was wondering, are you skeered that IU might have to play them in
round one and get stomped?
Best Regards, your pal,
JoJ
|
114.11 | | ALLVAX::BLANCHARD | | Thu Mar 07 1991 11:05 | 7 |
|
Re: 114.7
Richmond dumped Indiana at the Hartford Civic Center.
- tfb -
|
114.12 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Mar 07 1991 11:33 | 16 |
| Shank Peter don't rate a berth. Who they played? Stank Peter is a
squad who's mooching their way in. The best 64 teams in the country
(who aren't on probation) should be in the tourney. Spank Peter is
NOT one a those teams. Jersey City. Urban blight. Moochy-moochy
main.
If our TearyEyedYellowRibbonTNTnation has such a_appetite for heart
tending Hortio Alger stories why not sit back and wait for somebody
who EARNED their way in instead a a bunch a mooches like Skank Peter.
They'll be many many teams who're much better than Slack Peter in the
tourney. Who they played defense against? Fairly Ridiculous U.?
Eh?
Big10 Tom
|
114.13 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Mar 07 1991 12:05 | 32 |
| > Shank Peter don't rate a berth. Who they played? Stank Peter is a
> squad who's mooching their way in. The best 64 teams in the country
> (who aren't on probation) should be in the tourney. Spank Peter is
> NOT one a those teams. Jersey City. Urban blight. Moochy-moochy
> main.
(1) Why shuld "the best 64 teams in the country" go to the NCAA
tournament ? How has any team that was not good enough to be
their conference champions "earned" a bid to play for a national
championship ? It seems to me that those loser teams who weren't
good enough to win a conference title are the mooches.
(2) How do you know that St.Peter's isn't one of the top 64 teams ?
Have teams like Wisconsin or Colorado earned an NCAA bid ? Exactly
which teams do you expect will be left out of this year's tournament
have "earned" an NCAA spot ? Let's face it, every "big" school from
a "big" conference with, whose record is better than 16-12, will get in
to the tourney, but a lot of them will not have earned it. Heck, the
only REALLY good team IU has played this year is Ohio State, and the
Hoosiers lost to them twice. What gives them on a claim to any
tournament that decides a national championship ?
> They'll be many many teams who're much better than Slack Peter in the
> tourney.
No doubt that this is true, but this is not the point. How many
teams that DON'T make the tournament will have proven themselves to
be better than these smaller schools ? Wisconsin ? Colorado ?
Shoot, Purdue will probably moochy-moochy their way into the tournament
because of one big win last night, but they haven't earned it.
Of all the Big Ten teams, only Ohio State has EARNED a bid; all the
other loser schools are in the position of begging for an NCAA spot.
|
114.14 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | | Thu Mar 07 1991 12:11 | 6 |
| Hey Shagnasty, just what team didn't make the tourny that you seem to
think should have?
JoJ
PS - it'll be a Big East/ACC final four
|
114.15 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Mar 07 1991 12:25 | 17 |
| Teams that, so far, have earned their way into the NCAA tournament:
Ohio State Buckeyes 25 2 .926
Princeton Tigers 23 2 .920
East Tennessee State Buccaneers 28 4 .875
Arizona Wildcats 24 6 .800
St.Peter's Peacocks 24 6 .800
Wisconsin-Green Bay Phoenix 24 6 .800
Northeast Louisiana Indians 25 7 .781
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers 24 7 .774
St.Francis (Pennsylvania) Red Flash 24 7 .774
Creighton Bluejays 23 7 .767
Pepperdine Waves 22 8 .733
South Alabama Jaguars 22 8 .733
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs 21 9 .700
Richmond Spiders 21 9 .700
Towson State Tigers 19 10 .655
|
114.16 | Personally, I think the best 64 teams should go. | ANGLIN::KIRKMAN | Yeah, I get StarTrek jokes. | Thu Mar 07 1991 23:52 | 20 |
| About this big school vs. little school thing. Just to prove how
badly things are out of line, take a look at the Univerisity of
Wisconsin. Not the Badgers, the Phonix.
Now, I'm fairly sure that UW has several satilite campus thoughout
Wisconsin, one which happens to be in Green Bay, which just happens to
support a basketball team. Since I'm not a Wiscosin native, I'm not
interested in or realy familiar with either the Badgers or the Phonix,
but I've got a gut feeling as to which team might be the better team.
The Phonix won the Mid-American conference (I think) and are in the
tournement. The Badgers on the other hand haven't done that well in
the Big Ten and probubly won't make it.
So here you've got a team that may on even be the best team ON
CAMPUS!!! and yet are in the NCAA tournement.
How do you explain that one away?
SKK
|
114.17 | GSU, MSU, PSU all added to the list | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Mar 08 1991 09:18 | 20 |
| Teams that, so far, have earned their way into the NCAA tournament:
Ohio State Buckeyes 25 2 .926
Princeton Tigers 23 2 .920
East Tennessee State Buccaneers 28 4 .875
Arizona Wildcats 25 6 .806
St.Peter's Peacocks 24 6 .800
Wisconsin-Green Bay Phoenix 24 6 .800
Northeast Louisiana Indians 25 7 .781
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers 24 7 .774
St.Francis (Pennsylvania) Red Flash 24 7 .774
Creighton Bluejays 23 7 .767
Murray State Racers 24 8 .750
Pepperdine Waves 22 8 .733
South Alabama Jaguars 22 8 .733
Louisiana Tech Bulldogs 21 9 .700
Richmond Spiders 21 9 .700
Penn State Nittany Lions 20 10 .667
Towson State Tigers 19 10 .655
Georgia State Panthers 16 14 .567
|
114.18 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Fri Mar 08 1991 14:47 | 12 |
| I saw the St. Francis - Fordham game.
When it started, I sorta rolled my eyes and checked the listings to see
if there was anything else on. Nope.... so I started watching it.
Surprised me. Damned good game.
At the end, the St Francis fans were waving the `Bring on UNLV' signs
also. Cracked me up... but I thought it was neat. Reminded me of the
`Last Defiant Gesture' cartoon of the little mouse giving the finger to
the huge hawk that is swooping down on him.
Mike JN
|
114.19 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | | Sun Mar 10 1991 21:03 | 6 |
| Add Seton Hall to that list of teams that earned their way into the
tourny....
BTW - does Sorry_Excuse still deserve to be in it?
hawwwwwww
|
114.20 | Can anyone fill in the missing records ? | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Mar 11 1991 11:13 | 35 |
| East: #1 North Carolina 25-5 vs #16 Northeastern 22-9
#2 Syracuse 26-5 vs #15 Richmond 21-9
#3 Oklahoma State 22-7 vs #14 New Mexico 20-9
#4 UCLA vs #13 Penn State 20-10
#5 Mississippi State 20-8 vs #12 Eastern Michigan 24-6
#6 North Carolina State 19-10 vs #11 Southern Mississippi 21-7
#7 Purdue 17-11 vs #10 Temple 21-9
#8 Princeton 24-2 vs #9 Villanova 16-14
Southeast: #1 Arkansas 31-3 vs #16 Georgia State 16-14
#2 Indiana 27-4 vs #15 Coastal Carolina 24-7
#3 Kansas 22-7 vs #14 New Orleans 23-7
#4 Alabama 21-9 vs #13 Murray State 24-8
#5 Wake Forest 18-10 vs #12 Louisiana Tech 21-9
#6 Pittsburgh 20-11 vs #11 Georgia 17-12
#7 Florida State 20-10 vs #10 Southern California
#8 Arizona State vs #9 Rutgers
Midwest: #1 Ohio State 25-3 vs #16 Towson State
#2 Duke 27-8 vs #15 Northeast Louisiana 25-7
#3 Nebraska 26-7 vs #14 Xavier (Ohio) 21-9
#4 St.John's 20-8 vs #13 Northern Illinois 25-5
#5 Texas vs #12 St.Peter's 24-6
#6 Louisiana State 20-9 vs #11 Connecticut 18-10
#7 Iowa 20-10 vs #10 East Tennessee State 28-4
#8 Georgia Tech 16-12 vs #9 DePaul
West: #1 Nevada-Las Vegas 30-0 vs #16 Montana
#2 Arizona vs #15 St.Francis (Pennsylvania) 24-7
#3 Seton Hall 22-8 vs #14 Pepperdine 22-8
#4 Utah 28-3 vs #13 South Alabama 22-8
#5 Michigan State 18-10 vs #12 Wisconsin-Green Bay 24-6
#6 New Mexico State 23-5 vs #11 Creighton
#7 Virginia 21-11 vs #10 Brigham Young 20-12
#8 Georgetown 18-12 vs #9 Vanderbilt 17-12
|
114.21 | I think I got them all | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Mon Mar 11 1991 11:43 | 37 |
| >> -< Can anyone fill in the missing records ? >-
East: #1 North Carolina 25-5 vs #16 Northeastern 22-9
#2 Syracuse 26-5 vs #15 Richmond 21-9
#3 Oklahoma State 22-7 vs #14 New Mexico 20-9
#4 UCLA 23-8 vs #13 Penn State 20-10
#5 Mississippi State 20-8 vs #12 Eastern Michigan 24-6
#6 North Carolina State 19-10 vs #11 Southern Mississippi 21-7
#7 Purdue 17-11 vs #10 Temple 21-9
#8 Princeton 24-2 vs #9 Villanova 16-14
Southeast: #1 Arkansas 31-3 vs #16 Georgia State 16-14
#2 Indiana 27-4 vs #15 Coastal Carolina 24-7
#3 Kansas 22-7 vs #14 New Orleans 23-7
#4 Alabama 21-9 vs #13 Murray State 24-8
#5 Wake Forest 18-10 vs #12 Louisiana Tech 21-9
#6 Pittsburgh 20-11 vs #11 Georgia 17-12
#7 Florida State 20-10 vs #10 Southern California 19-9
#8 Arizona State 19-9 vs #9 Rutgers 19-9
Midwest: #1 Ohio State 25-3 vs #16 Towson State 19-10
#2 Duke 27-8 vs #15 Northeast Louisiana 25-7
#3 Nebraska 26-7 vs #14 Xavier (Ohio) 21-9
#4 St.John's 20-8 vs #13 Northern Illinois 25-5
#5 Texas 22-8 vs #12 St.Peter's 24-6
#6 Louisiana State 20-9 vs #11 Connecticut 18-10
#7 Iowa 20-10 vs #10 East Tennessee State 28-4
#8 Georgia Tech 16-12 vs #9 DePaul 20-8
West: #1 Nevada-Las Vegas 30-0 vs #16 Montana 22-7
#2 Arizona 26-6 vs #15 St.Francis (Pennsylvania) 24-7
#3 Seton Hall 22-8 vs #14 Pepperdine 22-8
#4 Utah 28-3 vs #13 South Alabama 22-8
#5 Michigan State 18-10 vs #12 Wisconsin-Green Bay 24-6
#6 New Mexico State 23-5 vs #11 Creighton 23-7
#7 Virginia 21-11 vs #10 Brigham Young 20-12
#8 Georgetown 18-12 vs #9 Vanderbilt 17-12
|
114.22 | Bring back ESPN for Round 1 | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Mar 11 1991 11:44 | 44 |
| Glad to see the UNM Lobos finally got into the big dance after so many
years of being snuffed. Ironically, they may not have deserved it this
year, but there were past years where they deserved and didn't get in.
UNM's case was probably helped immensely by Tennessee's good showing,
(& losing) in the SEC tournament. First of all, UT's success in the SEC
tourney made UNM look good because UNM beat UT early in the season,
plus UT's losing the championship game means they didn't take up
another at-large bid.
The Lobos have a tough foe in Oklahoma State, but they match up well.
OSU's main man is center Byron Houston, but UNM has Luc Longley. This
should be a great matchup, and if Longley wins the battle of the big
men, the Lobos might have a chance.
2 teams who got screwed in their seedings IMO were New Mexico St. and
East Tenn. State. NMSU got bumped down to a 6 seed in the West,
undoubtedly due to their upset loss to Fresno State in the 1st round of
the Big West Tournament. But ETSU's seed is even more of a shocker.
Here is a team that finished #12 in the final USA Today poll, yet only
got a 10 seed in the Midwest.
And finally, I think CBS' 1st-round coverage sucks! They have 5 hours of
games to start out, but then there's a 3-hour break. I could see 1
hour for local news, but I just think 3 hours is too much. All the
more reason to leave the 1st round to ESPN or at least let ESPN have it
while CBS isn't televising it. That's not even worth taking Thursday
or Friday off, or even going home early because the games don't resume
until 6pm out here.
Does anyone know if they've set starting times for the first-round
games yet? I couldn't find the times anywhere.
Joe
I don't see why everyone says the West is so loaded. Arizona is there,
but everyone knew that would happen, and the Cats aren't that scary
outside the McHale Center. Seton Hall is a good team who did win the
BET, but I don't think they're quite deserving of a 3 seed. Utah is a
very hardworking bunch that plays great as a team, but they're not a
legitimate top-20 team, and I'll say they won't get past the 2nd round.
UNLV's 2nd round game may be tougher than their 3rd round game, but I
still don't think G'town will give them much of a scare. Their
backcourt isn't that great and they're a poor shooting team. And UNLV
already whipped Michigan State by 20, and that was on MSU's home floor.
|
114.23 | Some ramblings | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Mon Mar 11 1991 12:44 | 18 |
| I've got mid-court seats for teh SE Regional in Charlotte...mid-court
next to the top of the coliseum that is. Charlotte officials aren't
very pleased with who's coming to their show. They were hoping for a
Duke or UNC. Wake Forest is what they got.
I'm happy because Pittsburgh was placed in the SE. I don't think
they'll make it to Charlotte. I think they can beat Kansas, but they
must first beat Georgia...they won't. I'll be rooting for Indiana
(unless their up against Pitt) at the games.
Why does Georgia's coach sound so familiar? Who is Hugh Durham? Why
am I forgetting where he came from?
But maybe the best part about all the seedings is NO BILLY TUBBS!!!
Any darkhorse picks out there? I'll take Northern Illinois.
--dan'l
|
114.24 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Mar 11 1991 12:46 | 4 |
| Hugh Durham coached at Florida State for a long time before going to
Georgia.
John
|
114.25 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Northeastern to beat the tarhells | Mon Mar 11 1991 13:44 | 10 |
| Well, I caint wait til the West Regional nexted week. Hopefully I'll
get to see Seton Hall (whom I'll have to route for in the West). I'll
probably get to see UNLV, unless Georgetown survives round 1 and
somehow the big boys lead an upset. I hope Arizona loses, never liked
them.
Should be a damn good show. Hope UNLV brings their showgals, er
Cheerleaders...
JD
|
114.26 | Pepperdine, warm up the bus! | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Mon Mar 11 1991 13:47 | 13 |
| re .23:
> Any darkhorse picks out there?
Didn't South Alabama make it to the final 16 last year or the year
before?
Just a wildass hunch, but I've got a feeling that Towson State is going
to give Ohio State all they can handle...
py
|
114.27 | | PNO::HEISER | Thomas McRocklin's teacher | Mon Mar 11 1991 14:02 | 4 |
| > somehow the big boys lead an upset. I hope Arizona loses, never liked
> them.
well I hope they stomp everyone cuz you don't like them ;-)
|
114.28 | Individual/team NCAA records and past results | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Mon Mar 11 1991 14:27 | 123 |
|
MEN'S NCAA TOURNAMENT INDIVIDUAL RECORDS
POINTS
Game: 61; Austin Carr, Notre Dame vs. Ohio, '70.
Series: 184; Glen Rice, (6 games), Mich., '89.
FIELD GOALS
Game: 25; Carr (44 attempted), Notre Dame, '70.
Series: 75; Rice, (6 games), Michigan, '89.
3-POINT FIELD GOALS
Game: 11; Jeff Fryer, Loyola Marymount, '90.
Series: 27; Rice, (6 games), Michigan, '89.
FREE THROWS
Game: 23; Bob Carney (26 att.), Bradley, '54; Travis Mays (27 att.),
Texas '90.
Series: 55; Carney (5 games), Bradley, '54.
REBOUNDS
Game: 31; Nate Thurmond, B. Green, '63.
Series: 97; Elvin Hayes (5 games), Houston, '68.
STEALS
Game: 7 (6 players).
Series: 23; Mookie Blaylock (6 games); Oklahoma, '88.
MEN'S NCAA TOURNAMENT TEAM RECORDS
POINTS
Game: 149; Loyola Marymount vs. Michigan (115), '90.
Both teams: 264; Loyola Marymount (149) vs. Michigan (115), '90.
Series: 571; Nevada-Las Vegas, '90 (102 vs. Ark.-Little Rock; 76 vs.
Ohio State; 69 vs. Ball State; 131 vs. Loyola Marymount; 90 vs. Georgia Tech;
103 vs. Duke).
FIELD GOALS
Game: 52; Iowa vs. Notre Dame, '70.
Both teams: 97; Iowa (52) vs. Notre Dame (45), '70.
Series: 218; Nevada-Las Vegas, '77 (49 vs. San Francisco; 37 vs. Utah;
44 vs. Idaho State; 41 vs. North Carolina; 47 vs. N.C.-Charlotte).
3-POINT GOALS
Game: 21; Loyola Marymount vs. Alabama, '90.
Series: 56; Loyola Marymount (4 games), '90.
FREE THROWS
Game: 41; Utah vs. Santa Clara, '60; Navy vs. Syracuse, '88.
Series: 146; Bradley, '54 (23 vs. Oklahoma City; 38 vs. Colorado; 29
vs. Oklahoma State; 24 vs. Southern Cal; 32 vs. La Salle).
FIELD-GOAL PCT.
Game: 79.0 (49-62), North Carolina vs. Loyola Marymount, '88.
FREE-THROW PCT.
Game (min. 22 FTM): 100 (22-22), Fordham vs. S. Carolina, '71.
REBOUNDS
Game: 86; Notre Dame vs. Tennessee Tech, '58.
Series: 306; Houston, '68 (54 vs. Ohio State; 54 vs. UCLA; 76 vs. Texas
Christian; 59 vs. Louisville; 63 vs. Loyola (Ill.).
ASSISTS
Game: 36; North Carolina vs. Loyola Marymount, '88.
Series: 140; Nevada-Las Vegas (6 games).
BLOCKED SHOTS
Game: 13; Louisville vs. Illinois, '89.
STEALS
Game: 19; Providence vs. Austin Peay, '87; Connecticut vs. Boston
University, '90.
Series: 72; Oklahoma (6 games).
FOULS
Game: 39; Kansas vs. Notre Dame, '75.
MEN'S CHAMPIONSHIPS RESULTS
YR CHAMPION SCORE RUNNER-UP OUTSTANDING PLAYER
1990 Nevada-Las Vegas 103-73 Duke Anderson Hunt, UNLV
1989 Michigan 80-79(1) Seton Hall Glen Rice, Michigan
1988 Kansas 83-79 Oklahoma Danny Manning, Kansas
1987 Indiana 74-73 Syracuse Keith Smart, Indiana
1986 Louisville 72-69 Duke Pervis Ellison, Louisville
1985 Villanova 66-64 Georgetown Ed Pinckney, Villanova
1984 Georgetown 84-75 Houston Patrick Ewing, Georgetown
1983 North Carolina St. 54-52 Houston Akeem Olajuwon, Houston
1982 North Carolina 63-62 Georgetown James Worthy, N. Carolina
1981 Indiana 63-50 N. Carolina Isiah Thomas, Indiana
1980 Louisville 59-54 UCLA Darrell Griffith, Louisville
1979 Michigan St. 75-64 Indiana St. Earvin Johnson, Michigan St.
1978 Kentucky 94-88 Duke Jack Givens, Kentucky
1977 Marquette 67-59 N. Carolina Butch Lee, Marquette
1976 Indiana 86-68 Michigan Kent Benson, Indiana
1975 UCLA 92-85 Kentucky Richard Washington, UCLA
1974 North Carolina St. 76-64 Marquette David Thompson, N.C. St.
1973 UCLA 87-66 Memphis St. Bill Walton, UCLA
1972 UCLA 81-76 Florida St. Bill Walton, UCLA
1971 UCLA 68-62 Villanova Howard Porter, Villanova
1970 UCLA 80-69 Jacksonville Sidney Wicks, UCLA
1969 UCLA 92-72 Purdue Lew Alcindor, UCLA
1968 UCLA 78-55 N. Carolina Lew Alcindor, UCLA
1967 UCLA 79-64 Dayton Lew Alcindor, UCLA
1966 Texas Western 72-65 Kentucky Jerry Chambers, Utah
1965 UCLA 91-80 Michigan Bill Bradley, Princeton
1964 UCLA 98-83 Duke Walt Hazzard, UCLA
1963 Loyola (Ill.) 60-58(1) Cincinnati Art Heyman, Duke
1962 Cincinnati 71-59 Ohio St. Paul Hogue, Cincinnati
1961 Cincinnati 70-65(1) Ohio St. Jerry Lucas, Ohio St.
1960 Ohio St. 75-55 California Jerry Lucas, Ohio St.
1959 California 71-70 West Virginia Jerry West, West Virginia
1958 Kentucky 84-72 Seattle Elgin Baylor, Seattle
1957 North Carolina 54-53(2) Kansas Wilt Chamberlain, Kansas
1956 San Francisco 83-71 Iowa Hal Lear, Temple
1955 San Francisco 77-63 La Salle Bill Russell, San Francisco
1954 La Salle 92-76 Bradley Tom Gola, LaSalle
1953 Indiana 69-68 Kansas B.H. Born, Kansas
1952 Kansas 80-63 St. John's Clyde Lovellette, Kansas
1951 Kentucky 68-58 Kansas St. None selected
1950 CC New York 71-68 Bradley Irwin Dambrot, CCNY
1949 Kentucky 46-36 Oklahoma St. Alex Groza, Kentucky
1948 Kentucky 58-42 Baylor Alex Groza, Kentucky
1947 Holy Cross 58-47 Oklahoma George Kaftan, Holy Cross
1946 Oklahoma St. 43-40 North Carolina Bob Kurland, Oklahoma St.
1945 Oklahoma St. 49-45 New York Bob Kurland, Oklahoma St.
1944 Utah 42-40(1) Dartmouth Arnold Ferrin, Utah
1943 Wyoming 46-34 Georgetown Ken Sailors, Wyoming
1942 Stanford 53-38 Dartmouth Howard Dallman, Stanford
1941 Wisconsin 39-34 Wash. St. John Kotz, Wisconsin
1940 Indiana 60-42 Kansas Marvin Huffman, Indiana
1939 Oregon 46-33 Ohio St. None selected
NOTE: 1-Overtime; 2-three overtimes
|
114.29 | Its about damn time for a comeback! | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Mon Mar 11 1991 14:40 | 5 |
| >YR CHAMPION SCORE RUNNER-UP OUTSTANDING PLAYER
>1946 Oklahoma St. 43-40 North Carolina Bob Kurland, Oklahoma St.
>1945 Oklahoma St. 49-45 New York Bob Kurland, Oklahoma St.
|
114.30 | Any info on No. Illinois? | POCUS::SALTALAMACCH | | Mon Mar 11 1991 14:49 | 8 |
| re: .23. Please don't say that Northern Illinois is a darkhorse. I'm
hoping my beloved Redmen can finish the season on the upswing with at
least one win in the Tourney.
Any other info on No. Illinois?
Redmen Phil
|
114.31 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Mar 11 1991 14:51 | 9 |
| First round dark horses
DePaul
Xavier
Connecticut
St Francis
Mike JN
|
114.32 | Check the p-name for a Final Four lock! | WORDY::NAZZARO | Princeton to the Final Four!!! | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:14 | 12 |
| Other first round darkhorses:
Murray State
Louisiana Tech
Eastern Michigan
South Alabama
Wisconsin-Green Bay
IMO, this year's entire crop of college teams is weak. After the top
7 or 8 teams, the next 50-75 schools are all about the same.
NAZZ
|
114.33 | Northern Illinois info | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:23 | 15 |
| NIU is coached by Jim Molinari, a long-time assistant under Ray and
Joey Meyer. Their best player is Donnell Thomas (16.8 ppg, 8.1
boards). They left the Mid American Conference a few years back to
become a major independent, but later joined the Mid Continent
Conference in basketball.
They won their conference regular season, but lost the tourny to
Wisconsin-Green Bay. The NCAA thought their record of 25-5, including
a win over Nebraska, was worth an at-large bid. Are very strong
defensively (second in the nation behind Princeton).
Very loyal and knowledgeable fans who will make the trip to Dayton.
Kenny Battle started at NIU before transferring to Illinois.
--dan'l
|
114.34 | Watch next reply | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:27 | 5 |
| The following reply is a postscript file of the NCAA 64 men's field on
one page 8X11. I got it off usenet newsgroup. I printed it out and it
worked and it looks nice.
Charles
|
114.35 | ext/noheader and print it out to your favorite postscript printer | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:28 | 216 |
| %!
%center a letter (or string) around the current point
/cntrlet {
dup stringwidth pop
0 -8 rmoveto
% center around current point - back up half of width
gsave
dup dup 14 gt { 14 exch div 1 scale } { pop } ifelse
2 div 0 exch sub 0 rmoveto
show
grestore
} def
/colshow {
dup stringwidth pop
gsave
dup 53 gt { 53 exch div 1 scale } { pop } ifelse
show
grestore
0 -16 rmoveto
} def
/westbracket {
2 div dup 1 gt {
% num
gsave
dup 4 mul 0 exch rlineto
5 0 rlineto
currentpoint
stroke
moveto
0 -6 rlineto 55 0 rlineto 0 6 rlineto currentpoint
0 6 rlineto -55 0 rlineto
closepath gsave 0.9 setgray fill grestore stroke
moveto dup westbracket
grestore
dup -4 mul 0 exch rlineto
5 0 rlineto
currentpoint
stroke
moveto
0 -6 rlineto 55 0 rlineto 0 6 rlineto currentpoint
0 6 rlineto -55 0 rlineto
closepath gsave 0.9 setgray fill grestore stroke
moveto westbracket
} { pop } ifelse
} def
/eastbracket {
2 div dup 1 gt {
% num
gsave
dup 4 mul 0 exch rlineto
-5 0 rlineto
currentpoint
stroke
moveto
0 -6 rlineto -55 0 rlineto 0 6 rlineto currentpoint
0 6 rlineto 55 0 rlineto
closepath gsave 0.9 setgray fill grestore stroke
moveto dup eastbracket
grestore
dup -4 mul 0 exch rlineto
-5 0 rlineto
currentpoint
stroke
moveto
0 -6 rlineto -55 0 rlineto 0 6 rlineto currentpoint
0 6 rlineto 55 0 rlineto
closepath gsave 0.9 setgray fill grestore stroke
moveto eastbracket
} { pop } ifelse
} def
90 rotate
0 -612 translate
1 setlinewidth
396 306 translate
gsave
30 0 moveto
64 westbracket
-30 0 moveto
64 eastbracket
30 8 moveto -30 8 lineto -30 -8 lineto 30 -8 lineto
closepath gsave 0.9 setgray fill grestore stroke
grestore
-360 -266 moveto -360 266 lineto -346 266 lineto -346 -266 lineto
closepath gsave 0.7 setgray fill grestore stroke
-360 0 moveto -346 0 lineto 3 setlinewidth stroke 1 setlinewidth
360 -266 moveto 360 266 lineto 346 266 lineto 346 -266 lineto
closepath gsave 0.7 setgray fill grestore stroke
360 0 moveto 346 0 lineto 3 setlinewidth stroke 1 setlinewidth
/Times-Bold findfont 20 scalefont setfont
-353 234 moveto (S) cntrlet
-353 208 moveto (O) cntrlet
-353 182 moveto (U) cntrlet
-353 156 moveto (T) cntrlet
-353 130 moveto (H) cntrlet
-353 104 moveto (E) cntrlet
-353 78 moveto (A) cntrlet
-353 52 moveto (S) cntrlet
-353 26 moveto (T) cntrlet
-353 -51 moveto (E) cntrlet
-353 -102 moveto (A) cntrlet
-353 -153 moveto (S) cntrlet
-353 -204 moveto (T) cntrlet
353 231 moveto (M) cntrlet
353 198 moveto (I) cntrlet
353 165 moveto (D) cntrlet
353 132 moveto (W) cntrlet
353 99 moveto (E) cntrlet
353 66 moveto (S) cntrlet
353 33 moveto (T) cntrlet
353 -51 moveto (W) cntrlet
353 -102 moveto (E) cntrlet
353 -153 moveto (S) cntrlet
353 -204 moveto (T) cntrlet
/Times-Roman findfont 10 scalefont setfont
-329 244 moveto
%SOUTHEAST
(Arkansas) colshow
(Georgia St.) colshow
(Arizona St.) colshow
(Rutgers) colshow
(Wake Forest) colshow
(Louisiana Tech) colshow
(Alabama) colshow
(Murray St.) colshow
(Pittsburgh) colshow
(Georgia) colshow
(Kansas) colshow
(New Orleans) colshow
(Florida St.) colshow
(USC) colshow
(Indiana) colshow
(Coastal Carolina) colshow
%EAST
(N. Carolina) colshow
(Northeastern) colshow
(Princeton) colshow
(Villanova) colshow
(Mississippi St.) colshow
(E. Michigan) colshow
(UCLA) colshow
(Penn State) colshow
(N.C. State) colshow
(So. Mississippi) colshow
(Oklahoma St.) colshow
(New Mexico) colshow
(Purdue) colshow
(Temple) colshow
(Syracuse) colshow
(Richmond) colshow
276 244 moveto
%MIDWEST
(Ohio State) colshow
(Towson St.) colshow
(Georgia Tech) colshow
(DePaul) colshow
(Texas) colshow
(St. Peter's) colshow
(St. John's) colshow
(No. Illinois) colshow
(LSU) colshow
(Connecticut) colshow
(Nebraska) colshow
(Xavier) colshow
(Iowa) colshow
(E. Tennesee St.) colshow
(Duke) colshow
(N.E. Louisiana) colshow
%WEST
(UNLV) colshow
(Montana) colshow
(Georgetown) colshow
(Vanderbilt) colshow
(Michigan St.) colshow
(Wisc. Green Bay) colshow
(Utah) colshow
(South Alabama) colshow
(New Mexico St.) colshow
(Creighton) colshow
(Seton Hall) colshow
(Pepperdine) colshow
(Virginia) colshow
(BYU) colshow
(Arizona) colshow
(St. Francis) colshow
/Times-Bold findfont 9 scalefont setfont
-342 244 moveto
(1) colshow (16) colshow (8) colshow (9) colshow
(5) colshow (12) colshow (4) colshow (13) colshow
(6) colshow (11) colshow (3) colshow (14) colshow
(7) colshow (10) colshow (2) colshow (15) colshow
(1) colshow (16) colshow (8) colshow (9) colshow
(5) colshow (12) colshow (4) colshow (13) colshow
(6) colshow (11) colshow (3) colshow (14) colshow
(7) colshow (10) colshow (2) colshow (15) colshow
332 244 moveto
(1) colshow (16) colshow (8) colshow (9) colshow
(5) colshow (12) colshow (4) colshow (13) colshow
(6) colshow (11) colshow (3) colshow (14) colshow
(7) colshow (10) colshow (2) colshow (15) colshow
(1) colshow (16) colshow (8) colshow (9) colshow
(5) colshow (12) colshow (4) colshow (13) colshow
(6) colshow (11) colshow (3) colshow (14) colshow
(7) colshow (10) colshow (2) colshow (15) colshow
showpage
|
114.36 | When? | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Mon Mar 11 1991 19:13 | 5 |
|
So when do the games begin? When does our contest get started up?
When will Dean choke?
B.A.
|
114.37 | | REFINE::ASHE | Step left, around & together with the right | Mon Mar 11 1991 23:24 | 2 |
| Is there a seeding ladder on-line that's not in postscript?
|
114.38 | PAC10 | BIS1::ROOSEN | | Tue Mar 12 1991 02:52 | 4 |
| Can anyone provide me the final standings of the PAC10 ?
Thanks
Patrick
|
114.39 | Game Time? | MPGS::BURGESS | | Tue Mar 12 1991 08:22 | 4 |
| Does anybody know what time the games are this Thursday & Saturday
in Maryland???
- Ken -
|
114.40 | | SACT41::ROSS | Blub... blub.. blub | Tue Mar 12 1991 08:55 | 30 |
| I'm still collecting entries for the NCAA Tournament Player Scoring Contest.
I've only got three entries so far.... Prize will be determined based on
my budget and on who wins. {For example, if ACC Chris were to enter and
win, a copy of "A Season on the Brink" would be appropriate; For Mike
Childs, a copy of "Rocket" Roger's autobiography; you get the idea;}
8 players: 2 C, 3 F, 3 G - only one from any team... also send a guess for
total points scored by the eight players during the tournament as tiebreaker.
Use this form:
--------------------------------
Name: Email Address: Total Points:
Player Name Team
C
C
F
F
F
G
G
G
--------------------------------
Send to DUGROS::ROSS or 34193::ROSS
|
114.41 | don't even bother guys I got the winner ;^) | CHIEFF::CHILDS | but Lefty's got letters | Tue Mar 12 1991 09:08 | 6 |
|
but Doug, I wanted Wade's book "My life as a Sexophilimac"...
;^)
mike
|
114.43 | Starting times | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Mar 12 1991 11:37 | 55 |
| All times are Mountain
EAST
College Park(Thurs.):
#3 Oklahoma State 22-7 vs #14 New Mexico 20-9, 10:20 am
#6 North Carolina State 19-10 vs #11 Southern Mississippi 21-7, 30 minutes
after OSU-UNM game ends.
#7 Purdue 17-11 vs #10 Temple 21-9, 5:35 pm
#2 Syracuse 26-5 vs #15 Richmond 21-9, 30 min. after Pur.-Tem. ends
Syracuse, NY (Fri.)
#5 Mississippi State 20-8 vs #12 Eastern Michigan 24-6, 10:25 am
#4 UCLA 23-8 vs #13 Penn State 20-10, 30 min. after MSU-EMU ends
#1 North Carolina 25-5 vs #16 Northeastern 22-9, 5:32 pm
#8 Princeton 24-2 vs #9 Villanova 16-14, 30 min. after UNC-NU ends.
SOUTHEAST
Louisville, KY (Thurs.):
#6 Pittsburgh 20-11 vs #11 Georgia 17-12, 10:15 am
#3 Kansas 22-7 vs #14 New Orleans 23-7, 30 min. after Pitt-Geo. ends
#7 Florida State 20-10 vs #10 Southern California 19-9, 5:40 pm
#2 Indiana 27-4 vs #15 Coastal Carolina 24-7, 30 min. after FSU-CC ends
Atlanta, GA (Fri.):
#1 Arkansas 31-3 vs #16 Georgia State 16-14, 10:15 am
#8 Arizona State 19-9 vs #9 Rutgers 19-9, 30 min. after Ark.-GSU ends
#4 Alabama 21-9 vs #13 Murray State 24-8, 5:36 pm
#5 Wake Forest 18-10 vs #12 Louisiana Tech 21-9, 30 min. after WF-LT ends
MIDWEST
Minneapolis (Thurs.):
#2 Duke 27-8 vs #15 Northeast Louisiana 25-7, 10:35 am
#7 Iowa 20-10 vs #10 East Tennessee State 28-4, 30 min. after Duke-ETSU ends
#6 Louisiana State 20-9 vs #11 Connecticut 18-10, 6:10 pm
#3 Nebraska 26-7 vs #14 Xavier (Ohio) 21-9, 30 min. after LSU-UConn ends
Datyon, OH (Fri.):
#4 St.John's 20-8 vs #13 Northern Illinois 25-5, 10:35 am
#5 Texas 22-8 vs #12 St.Peter's 24-6, 30 min. after SJU-NIU ends
#1 Ohio State 25-3 vs #16 Towson State 19-10, 5:35 pm
#8 Georgia Tech 16-12 vs #9 DePaul 20-8, 30 min. after OSU-TSU ends
WEST
Salt Lake City (Thurs.):
#3 Seton Hall 22-8 vs #14 Pepperdine 22-8, 12:30 pm
#6 New Mexico State 23-5 vs #11 Creighton 23-7, 30 min. after SHU-Pep. ends
#7 Virginia 21-11 vs #10 Brigham Young 20-12, 6:05 pm
#2 Arizona 26-6 vs #15 St.Francis (Pennsylvania) 24-7, 30min after UVA-BYU ends
Tucson, AZ (Fri.):
#5 Michigan State 18-10 vs #12 Wisconsin-Green Bay 24-6, 12:30 pm
#4 Utah 28-3 vs #13 South Alabama 22-8, 30 min. after MSU-WGB ends
#8 Georgetown 18-12 vs #9 Vanderbilt 17-12, 6:10 pm
#1 Nevada-Las Vegas 30-0 vs #16 Montana 22-7, 30 min. after Geo-Vand ends
|
114.44 | What's the CBS sked?? | POCUS::SALTALAMACCH | | Tue Mar 12 1991 14:08 | 4 |
| Does anyone know what games will be shown live on CBS?
Redmen Phil
|
114.45 | A somewhat random list of "name" players | WORDY::NAZZARO | Princeton to the Final Four!!! | Tue Mar 12 1991 14:41 | 34 |
| Hawk, here are some guys I'm sure you'll like:
Dikembe Mutombo - Georgetown
Tony Dunkin - Coastal Carolina Chanticleers (Dunkin a hoop name?-WOW!)
Popeye Jones - Murray State
Keith Luckydo - Georgia State
Literial Green - Georgia
Ghandi Jordan - Pitt
Luc Longley - New Mexico
Melvin Cheatum - ALabama
Calbert Cheaney - Indiana
Adonis Jordan - Kansas
Michael Polite - Florida State
Keith "Mister" Jennings - ETSU
Locksley Collie - Texas
Shaquille O'Neal - LSU
Acie Earl - Iowa
Beau Reid - Nebraska
Carlos Funchess - NE Louisiana
Latrell Wrightsell - Creighton
Mike Iuzzolino - St Francis
Tony Bennett - Wisconsin-Green Bay
Clarence Weatherspoon - Southern Mississippi
Tom Gugliotta - NC State
Kit Mueller - Princeton
Two maxims:
Take nobody from North Carolina
Take anybody from UNLV
Hope this helps.
NAZZ
|
114.47 | bet chaos reigns supreme courtesy of CBS! | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Tue Mar 12 1991 14:54 | 23 |
| Phil,
According to the Glob and my interpretation, it's going to be a
disaster! CBS is going to try to fit 32 games into 8 tv slots over
Thursday and Friday. (BTW they have no experience in this area)
Glob said 3 Big East team games will be carried Thursday with the 4th
being Duke/NL.
Friday night is Northeastern/Tarhells @7:32 (in the Boston area only?)
because of where the Huskies are located (6th largest tv market).
Princeton/'nova later and finally, UNLV/Montana around midnight.
If the NE/NC game is a blowout, it appears that local programming
may switch to anything they want. I don't believe the entire country
will be seeing the same parts of various games, probably due to the
local stations desire to "play the local favorite & get viewers".
Already I'm wanting ESPN back!
HTH,
Kev
|
114.48 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | but Lefty's got letters | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:07 | 11 |
|
Like Kev said it basically going to be regional coverage with the ability
to switch around. They're hoping with the 15 minute delays that you'll
get to see 2 whole games basically concerning teams from your geographical
area and you'll get to see about 8 buzzer beating finishes...
Nazz isn't Litteral Green sidelined? I thought that I heard that the other
night...
Kev, all set I'll either interoffice to you or you tell me if you're planning
to be in my neighborhood shortly.......
|
114.49 | ~$25.00 at SPAGS...... | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:10 | 27 |
|
For those of us unfortunates who won't be able to play couch potato
during working hours or who can't program the vcr (due to other family
members wanting UHF (or is it VHF??) channels, I thought I'd offer
a possible alternative.
The radio I have in the office is madde by GE and it has AM/FM and
(sound only) TV! During the Gulf war, I'd tune in one of the TV
stations and get the audio portion of the updates.
I plan to tune into a local CBS station and listen to whatever bimbo's
CBS doing the games. My expectations are low - TV announcers are
color only and are forbidden to use accounts, descriptions and
goings-on of sporting events (probably by gov't regulation) but
it's hopefully better than nothing.
The radio sells for ~$35.00. I have never seen another brand receive
the TV band, only GE.
<disclamer>
I do not own, nor am I aware of any member of my family being a GE
stockholder.
Just a thought, thought I'd post it early enough so folks could go
shopping if you are so incluned to expand your cubicles comforts ;*)
Kev
|
114.50 | | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:35 | 9 |
| re: Litterial Green
He's in pretty bad shape but the doctors have cleared him to play.
Apparently he'll be in alot of pain but can't do any more damage.
I like Pitt.
- ACC Chris
|
114.51 | Green Is Out for NCAA | CSCOAC::SIMMONS_M | God Speed-Now That's Fast | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:39 | 3 |
| Reg 114.48 Yes Litteral Green of U of GA is sidelined for the NCAA.
Mike
|
114.52 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Mar 12 1991 17:04 | 5 |
| Nazz, don't forget:
House Guest
Mike JN
|
114.53 | Isn't there a contest? | PENSAR::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Mar 13 1991 14:22 | 44 |
| Since I haven't seen any tourney contest,I thought I would post my
predictions for anyone who cared.
West
UNLV
Georgetown UNLV
Mich St UNLV
South Ala Mich St
NMST UNLV
Seton Hall NMST NMST
UVA
Arizona Arizona UNLV
Midwest
Ohio State
Depaul Depaul UNLV
Texas Depaul
UNI Texas
LSU Iowa
Xaivier Xaivier
Iowa Iowa
Duke Iowa
UNC
Villanova UNC
EMU UNC
UCLA UCLA
NCST NCST
OSU Purdue
Purdue NCST
Syracuse NCST
Arkansas Arkansas
Rutgers Arkansas Arkansas
Wake Alabama
Alabama
Georgia Georgia Arkansas
Kansas Indiana
USC Indiana
Indiana
UNLV 97-88 over Arkansas in the finals
|
114.54 | | CAM::WAY | Happiness is a warm scrum, mon | Wed Mar 13 1991 14:34 | 6 |
| Dave,
I'm sure the winner could get that unused Jock from WelcherDinz as a
prize.....
'Saw
|
114.55 | Interesting Tidbit | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Wed Mar 13 1991 22:22 | 6 |
| Thursday's Nebraska vs Xavier game will be coached by two former Digger
Phelps assistants, Danny Nee and Pete Gillen, respectively. If
Digger's head rolls, does the winner of this game go to South Bend next
year? Gillen maybe. Nee's got too much cooking in huskerland.
--dan'l
|
114.56 | Digger safe | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Thu Mar 14 1991 10:19 | 5 |
| Notre Dame said the other day that Digger's job is safe.
Yeah, and the check is in the mail, pal ...
Bob Hunt
|
114.57 | 8^) | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Thu Mar 14 1991 10:28 | 9 |
|
Ya, safe for now, but what if my project get's cancelled? And
how the hell does Notre Dame know that my job is 'safe'?
Jeez does everyone know my affairs?
Digger
|
114.58 | There's gotta be a few upsets | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Mar 14 1991 11:05 | 12 |
| If you go by seeds (excluding 8-9 games), I'll say 3 first-round
upsets:
Penn St. over UCLA
BYU over UVA
ETSU over Iowa
Xavier over Nebraska.
Remember, you read 'em here first. Now, bring on the tourney!!!
Joe
|
114.59 | | REFINE::ASHE | Left, around & together w/ the right.. | Thu Mar 14 1991 14:01 | 2 |
| Any scores yet?
|
114.60 | SCORES | AIMHI::CROCKETT | | Thu Mar 14 1991 14:19 | 2 |
| OSU DEFEATED MEW MEXICO
PITT TRAILS GEORGIA 70 -68 IN OT
|
114.61 | Atleast, I HOPE they won it... | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Thu Mar 14 1991 14:20 | 4 |
| Oklahoma State beat New Mexico. They left the game to show Georgia
and Pitt so I didn't get the score.
Cowboy
|
114.62 | SCORES | AIMHI::CROCKETT | | Thu Mar 14 1991 14:29 | 10 |
| FINAL SCORES
DUKE 102
NORTHEAST LA. 73
OSU 67
NEW MEXICO 54
PITT 76
GEORGIA 68 OT
|
114.63 | FIRST HALF SCORES | AIMHI::CROCKETT | | Thu Mar 14 1991 14:59 | 2 |
| SETON HALL 26
PEPPERDINE 13
|
114.64 | Looking for a phone number for scores ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Mar 14 1991 16:18 | 8 |
| Last year somebody posted an 800 number for one of those Las Vegas
betting prediction places. After the obligatory commercial they
gave up-to-the-minute NCAA scores.
Anybody know that number?
- ACC Chris
|
114.66 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Fri Mar 15 1991 14:30 | 4 |
| Arkansas beat Georgia St.
E. Michigan beat Miss. St.
St. Johns up by 8 over N. Illinois with about a minute left.
|
114.67 | updates | HOCUS::SALTALAMACCH | | Fri Mar 15 1991 15:08 | 15 |
| Final scores:
SJU 75 NIU 68; What happened? SJU was up by 16 at halftime, and
then by 20 (so I heard) in the second half. How did it get so close?
EMU 76 MSU 56
Ark 117 Ga St 77
MSU 23 Wis GB 21
UCLA 10 PSU 10
Redmen Phil
|
114.68 | deal me in too! | ISLNDS::AREANO | Rich get richer,poor get drunk | Fri Mar 15 1991 15:16 | 10 |
| > Last year somebody posted an 800 number for one of those Las Vegas
> betting prediction places. After the obligatory commercial they
> gave up-to-the-minute NCAA scores.
>
> Anybody know that number?
Sent it to me too if someone finds one! I never though those
22 cent phone calls could add up to much, but they do!
Paul
|
114.69 | Some terrible seedings by NCAA | PENSAR::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Fri Mar 15 1991 15:21 | 14 |
|
I am not surprised Eastern Michigan and Xaivier won. It was certainly
not that big a shocker with Richmond,even though I picked Syracuse.
I don't even consider a lot of the results where hgiher seeds lost to
be upsets;I think the seedings are terrible,underrating teams from
lesser conferences.
Take Xaivier;Six straight NCAA appearances against the newcomers from
Nebraska. I had little doubt about that result. Temple had no business
being a 10 against Purdue 7,it should have been reversed. The 11 vs 6
and 10 vs 7 matchups were even at 4-4 and now an underrated 12 has
beaten an overrated 5.
These results are not the huge upsets we are led to believe.
|
114.70 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Mar 15 1991 15:53 | 4 |
| 2nd Half: Wisconsin-Green Bay 53, Michigan State 48
UCLA 38, Penn State 38
Half: Rutgers 36, Arizona State 30
Texas 32, St.Peter's 30
|
114.71 | Still more updates..... | HOCUS::SALTALAMACCH | | Fri Mar 15 1991 15:54 | 12 |
| More scores:
Texas 30 St Peters 28
UCLA 38 Penn St 32
Wis-GB 51 Mich St 46
Rutgers 36 Ariz St 30
Redmen Phil
|
114.72 | Thanks for the scores,keep em coming | PENSAR::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Fri Mar 15 1991 15:59 | 2 |
| Thanks for those scores,we sure appreciate them!!!!!!!!
|
114.73 | Final at the buzzer | SALEM::DODA | Sleep, who needs it? | Fri Mar 15 1991 16:01 | 2 |
| Mich. St. 60
Wisc 58
|
114.75 | Help | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Fri Mar 15 1991 16:14 | 8 |
| Hey guys..
I'm stuck here till 3:00 am today..I sure would appreciate it if
someone would be so kind to keep me posted during the games...at least
some final scores as they come in. I have no radio or T.V. to go by.
thanks hopefully!
B.A.
|
114.76 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Mar 15 1991 16:16 | 4 |
| Final: Michigan State 60, Wisconsin-Green Bay 58
2nd Half: UCLA 60, Penn State 59
Rutgers 51, Arizona State 49
Texas 46, St.Peter's 37
|
114.77 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Mar 15 1991 16:33 | 6 |
| 2nd Half: Penn State 71, UCLA 67
25 seconds left, PSU at free-throw line
Rutgers 63, Arizona State 63
about 6.5 minutes left
Texas 60, St.Peter's 52
|
114.78 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Mar 15 1991 16:50 | 6 |
| Final: Penn State 74, UCLA 69
Arizona State 78, Rutgers 76
14 seconds left, ASU with ball
Texas 72, St.Peter's 65
just under 2 minutes to go
|
114.79 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Mar 15 1991 17:01 | 4 |
| Final: Arizona State 79, Rutgers 76
Texas 73, St.Peter's 65
|
114.80 | Thanks | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Fri Mar 15 1991 17:08 | 6 |
|
Thanks guys...
Sounds like that ASU game was a tough one...
B.A.
|
114.81 | It's up to Seton Hall and Princeton | PENSAR::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Fri Mar 15 1991 17:14 | 1 |
| Damn,two New Jersey teams at once! Go Princeton!
|
114.82 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Mar 15 1991 17:23 | 3 |
| The report I heard indicated that Rutgers trailed by 2 with 3
seconds left, had the ball under their own basket, and threw the
ball away.
|
114.83 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Mar 15 1991 17:33 | 1 |
| Halftime: South Alabama 41, Utah 34
|
114.84 | NCAA MATCH-UPS THIS WEEKEND | WLDWST::RCARRUTHERS | | Sat Mar 16 1991 08:43 | 38 |
| NCAA SECOND ROUND
EAST
Saturday:
#03 Oklahoma State____________ | | | #06 N.Carolina State__________
#10 Temple____________________ | | | #15 Richmond__________________
Sunday:
#12 Eastern Michigan__________ | | | #13 Penn State________________
#01 North Carolina____________ | | | #09 Villanova_________________
SOUTHEAST
Saturday:
#03 Kansas____________________ | | | #06 Pittsburg_________________
#02 Indiana___________________ | | | #07 Florida State_____________
Sunday:
#01 Arkansas__________________ | | | #08 Arizona State_____________
#04 Alabama___________________ | | | #05 Wake Forest_______________
MIDWEST
Saturday:
#02 Duke______________________ | | | #07 Iowa______________________
#11 U. Connecticut____________ | | | #14 Xavier (Ohio)_____________
Sunday:
#04 St. Johns_________________ | | | #05 Texas_____________________
#01 Ohio State________________ | | | #08 Georgia Tech______________
WEST
Saturday:
#03 Seton Hall________________ | | | #11 Creighton_________________
#02 Arizona___________________ | | | #10 BYU_______________________
Sunday:
#04 Utah______________________ | | | #05 Michigan St.______________
#01 Nevada Las-Vegas__________ | | | #08 Georgetown________________
|
114.85 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Sat Mar 16 1991 10:48 | 11 |
| Well, I went 20-12 in round one of my pool. That means the best I can
do is go 10-6 next round because of the way my bad picks line up from
round one.
I really got hammered in the East. Only got two games right. Did ok
everywhere else.
My only prayer of winning this thing is if UNLV doesn't win the
championship.
JoJ
|
114.86 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Sat Mar 16 1991 21:28 | 11 |
| Results at end of day (don't remember the scores)
East: Oklahoma State and Temple win
Southeast: Indiana and Kansas
Midwest: Duke and UConn
West: Seton Hall and Arizona
In these brackets so far, the real upsets have ended up being Syracuse
and Nebraska. They are the only 2 and 3 seeds who haven't advanced.
John
|
114.87 | MAC earns respect! | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Sun Mar 17 1991 17:41 | 14 |
| For the second year in a row, the Mid-American Conference sends its rep
to the Sweet 16! No better way to gain respect than to earn it. Penn
State beating UCLA certainly helps, but making it to the Sweet 16 is
still one helluva accomplishment.
And to all you who were saying Utah wasn't a ligit top 10 team, here's
a big raspberry fer ya:
THHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHPPPTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!
Rick Majeris took Ball State to the second round two years ago if I'm
not mistaken.
--dan'l
|
114.88 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Sun Mar 17 1991 19:31 | 12 |
| Today's winners are North Carolina, Eastern Michigan, Arkansas,
Alabama, Ohio State, St Johns, Utah and UNLV.
The Southeast Regional held form perfectly with no upsets at all.
While the West Regional had 2 upset winners (Creighton and BYU) it had
no effect on the end result as the 1-4 seeds have advance. In the
Midwest, UConn and Xavier were the first round upset winners but 1, 2,
4 and 6 have advanced, the #6 seed being UConn. The East Regional was
the mess. It had 4 first round upsets and has seen the 1 and 3 teams
advance but the others there are #10 Temple and #12 Eastern Michigan.
John
|
114.89 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Sun Mar 17 1991 19:55 | 3 |
| Oops, UConn was a #11 seed, not a #6.
John
|
114.90 | Thoughts of an idle mind... | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Mon Mar 18 1991 09:24 | 21 |
| Did anyone else think yesterday's game was called heavily in UNLV's
favor? The non-call when Harrison got floored took that game away from
Georgetown who was in postion to make a stretch run.
I like Larry Johnson as a player, but he seems like a real jerk as far
as sportsmanship goes.
Eastern Michigan has the coolest uniforms of the sweet 16.
I've got some seats to the sold out regionals in Charlotte if any of
you want to make a deal (Kansas vs Indiana, Arkansas vs Alabama).
I think Dean Smith finally figured out that Montross is a good player.
That only took 20 weeks. Dean is getting quicker as he gets older. If
Dean gives him the minutes he gave him yesterday, UNC just might have a
chance this year.
Don't take Temple too lightly...but something also tells me OK State is
going to the Final Four.
--dan'l
|
114.91 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Mon Mar 18 1991 09:25 | 14 |
| Well, I went 7-9 for round two. Of course I started out 0-6 before the
round even started so I didn't do too badly.
On the bright side, 3 out of my final 4 picks are still alive and well
so I could cash in on the big points for picking the later rounds
correctly.
Duke is looking real good as is Seton Hall.
JoJ
re: Dan
How'd your boy "whiney face" do this weekend?
|
114.92 | A true tournament of champions | PENSAR::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Mon Mar 18 1991 09:35 | 17 |
| I was also 20-12 in the first round(I did pick Xaivier and Eastern
Michigan),but only 6-10 in round 2. I mistakenly picked a lot of upsets
this year and that just hasn't happened.
One thing that stands out among the sweet 16. For once it is a cross
section of the best teams in each conference. Only connecticut would
not be here with my 4 team per conference limit. The Huskies have had
the luckiest draw by far facing injury weakened LSU and Xaivier squads.
For the most part,the seeding committee has done a good job. One extra
bright note for Seton Hall fans: Danny Hurley (Bob's more talented
younger brother and a Seton Hall recruit) was the MVP as St Anthonys
of Jersey City(Terry Dehere and Jerry Walker) easily won the NJ
tournament of champions yesterday.
|
114.93 | Turn out my lights, the party's over | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:00 | 11 |
| Yeah, I'm about to get lapped, it seems like, in our office pool. I went
a miserable 18-14 in the first round and followed that up with an equally
horrid 7-9 second round. I did have Xavier and Richmond but I put too
much faith in some other upsets that just didn't happen. I thought East
Tennessee would stick around a little longer and I was also praying for a
monster upset of Princeton over North Carolina.
We've got one fellow in our pool who went 26-6 and then 12-4. Ouch. I'm
probably already mathematically eliminated.
Bob Hunt
|
114.94 | Carolina moves on ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:12 | 9 |
| > and I was also praying for a monster upset of Princeton over North
> Carolina
A bit of advise for ya Ketch: 'Bet with your Head, not your Heart.'.
HTH,
- ACC Chris
|
114.95 | Just pick the seeded teams | PENSAR::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:13 | 14 |
| The only big confernece left out of this year's sweet 16 is the Metro.
Big East - 3
ACC,Big 10,Big 8 - 2
SWC,SEC,BW,A10,WAC,Pac 10,Mid Am - 1
Re Bob Hunt and predictions:
Now that my picks went totally awry,it's so easy to see how I should
have picked. The absencs of Missouri,kentucky and Illinois made the
lower teams a lot weaker this year. If you had just picked the higher
seed in every game,you would have 13 of the 16 teams correct and a
monster record. In the Midwest,where all the seeds made it through, I
picked Iowa,DePaul,Xaivier and Texas.
|
114.97 | Legal and Illegal | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:23 | 14 |
| For those of you wondering about the legality of office pools, I read
the following this weekend:
Illegal - something similar to pulling teams from a hat and
having that team throughout the tournament. Since this is a
chance bet, it is considered gambling.
Legal - something like picking the entire field and betting
on your picks. Here you are using your sports knowledge to
prognosticate. Therefore, it is not gambling.
HTH.
--dan'l
|
114.98 | Nah, she won't do it | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:25 | 7 |
| � A bit of advise for ya Ketch: 'Bet with your Head, not your Heart.'.
This from the man who believed Pepper when she said she'd keep her hands
off his beltless jeans. Hey, Soup, a bit of advice for you ... Ummm,
never mind, you figured it out already anyway ...
Bob Hunt
|
114.99 | | CAM::WAY | Sha-WING! | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:27 | 21 |
| > Illegal - something similar to pulling teams from a hat and
> having that team throughout the tournament. Since this is a
> chance bet, it is considered gambling.
>
> Legal - something like picking the entire field and betting
> on your picks. Here you are using your sports knowledge to
> prognosticate. Therefore, it is not gambling.
In Connecticut, there is no problem with either. As long as all the
money in the pool is distributed to player(s) of the pool, there's
no problem.
The problem (in this state anyway) is when the runner of the pool
keeps a cut for himself/herself....
HTH,
'Saw
|
114.100 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:40 | 8 |
|
Since when is it not gambling if some skill is involved? I thought
placing bets on games with bookies, playing poker (see Lenny Dykstra),
etc., was illegal? Or is there something special about keeping it
inside the office?
glenn
|
114.101 | Gambling is chance. Using skill is illegal? | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Rah! Rah! Bronx! Go, Bronx! | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:45 | 12 |
| Casino's went to the NJ Supreme Court over this. THey wanted to keep
card-counting black jack players OUT of the casinos based on the fact
that counters weren't participating in a game of chance but instead
were playing odds. I believe the courts upheld the casinos right to
bar counters, who as the casinos put it, were NOT gambling.
BTW, casino gamblers, Blackjack is the ONLY game where the odds can
ride with the player NO MATTER what strategy someone told you about
craps or roulette. Every other game is a losing proposition and don't
believe anything else you'll hear on the subject.
Dan
|
114.102 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:50 | 25 |
| I was suprised that Georgetown was able to stay within striking
distance, especially after UNLV raced out to that early 15-point lead.
Can't believe that Bulls**t technical they threw on Johnson when
Mourning fouled out. NCAA is getting as bad as the NFL. Just because
the game was semi-close yesterday, doesn't mean the Rebs will be
beaten. I don't think they're gonna shoot that bad the rest of the
tournament. (38%, 19% from 3-point range.)
I still can't believe that call against Utah at the end of regulation.
Utah was leading by 4, and the Michigan State guy made a layup. There
was also a foul behind the play, and they proceeded to give the
Spartans TWO shots. I never saw that before. In both OT's, Utah tried
to give it away, but just couldn't. They couldn't get a defensive
rebound to save their lives. Anyways, they're the first WAC team to
make the Sweet 16 since Wyoming in 1987. Ironically, Wyoming lost to
UNLV in the Sweet 16 that year.
Can somebody please tell FSU that there's 2 halves to a basketball
game? They got totally blitzed in the 2nd half. Hope Kansas disposes of
the Hoosiers.
Why CBS decided to show Texas-St. John's instead of Michigan State-Utah
yesterday I'll never know.
Joe
|
114.103 | Can you say 'Make Up Call'? | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 18 1991 12:12 | 8 |
| re: .-1 (MSU call)
I here ya. Truly a *horrendous* call. Me_thinks the refs tried to
make up for their gaff last year when Kenny A's shot went in a tick
late, but Jud still found a way to lose this one!
- ACC Chris
|
114.104 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Let's go Seton Hall, SJU, UCONN! | Mon Mar 18 1991 12:53 | 14 |
| Larry Johnson deserved the technical. UNLV had been warned earlier
about taunting. Taunting should not be allowed, nor condoned, at the
college level (or H.S. level or below, either). UNLV got away with
murder. I like when the announcer said "Just what is over the back in
this game?" This is after Johnson went right through Kelley on a
missed foul shot - over the back - no call. This right after Mutombo
or some one on GU was called fro OVer-the-back on a less obvious call.
The non-call on Harrison was horrible.
I found the referee-ing very suspect this weekend. The favored team
got the benefit in every game I saw.
JD
|
114.105 | I'm just wary, that's all... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 18 1991 13:14 | 23 |
|
> -< Gambling is chance. Using skill is illegal? >-
I didn't say this. I said that, as far as I know, placing a bet on a
sporting event with the neighborhood bookie is still illegal. By
extension, one would think that office pools which involve the same
activity would also be illegal. I don't doubt that in some states,
under a certain dollar amount and subject to certain constraints that
pools are completely legal. I personally don't have any problem with
them whatsoever. I was just unaware that an activity which involves
money and a great deal of chance is no longer considered gambling,
and I wouldn't count on the suggestion that if there's skill involved
you shouldn't worry about engaging in the activity. For what it's
worth...
Also, blackjack too is a losing proposition under all circumstances
where card counting is either disallowed or made irrelevant with
the use of multiple decks. If not just for the recreational
enjoyment of it, I'd stay away from all casino games if you're in it
for the money.
glenn
|
114.106 | 8 decks? No problem. | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Rah! Rah! Bronx! Go, Bronx! | Mon Mar 18 1991 13:18 | 8 |
| >Also, blackjack too is a losing proposition under all circumstances
>where card counting is either disallowed or made irrelevant with
>the use of multiple decks.
Multiple decks make the margin smaller, but it is still a winning
proposition.
Dan
|
114.107 | of course, cain't please everybody.... | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Mon Mar 18 1991 13:19 | 11 |
| Hey Joe,
I, for one, was absolutely OVERJOYED that CBS decided
to show LOUIEEEE and the boys.
Kev
WAYYY TOO GO LOUIEEEE!!!!!! Sweet 16 baby!!!!!
congrats.....
|
114.108 | No problem? Why you still working at DEC, Dan? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 18 1991 13:34 | 19 |
|
>>Also, blackjack too is a losing proposition under all circumstances
>>where card counting is either disallowed or made irrelevant with
>>the use of multiple decks.
> Multiple decks make the margin smaller, but it is still a winning
> proposition.
Counting cards, yes. Playing halfway into eight decks, you'd have to
be a genius, though. It depends on the particular casino's rules, but
playing blackjack just by a static set of rules pays off at something
like 48%, tops. If it were anything but, a couple of stiffs like you
and I could bankrupt all of the casinos in the country in not much
time at all. I think this is pretty much what the casinos were getting
at in their suits against card counters. The odds *have* to be in
their favor in *all* games, or they simply wouldn't be around long.
glenn
|
114.109 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Choc. bunnies yes;M'mallow chicks no | Mon Mar 18 1991 13:58 | 17 |
|
The general rule around here in MA seems to be that gambling is O.K. as
long as the State gets a piece of the action. A person can't run a
numbers game, but the State does. It's illegal for me to call my
bookie to put a few bucks on the ponies or the puppies, because they
can't monitor and grab off a piece of his share, or a piece of my
winnings for that matter.
When I worked a local church Bingo game a few years back, I was told by
one of the State Inspectors that Bingo was the largest gambling money
revenue in the State, even outstripping the Megabucks lotteries and the
Instant Game tickets. That was because there are many games in many
towns and cities running Bingo seven nights (and weekend days), and the
State was entitled to 5% of the GROSS.
Dickstah
|
114.110 | | WFOVX8::MORRISON | Happy St. Joseph's Day (March 19) | Mon Mar 18 1991 14:07 | 13 |
|
Glenn,
I thought the odds on blackjack were higher, like above
90%. Besides that small nit, I agree with what your saying.
The thing is, because of the odds at *any* game, the casino
is going to get a couple of pennies of every dollar bet. Some games
have better odds than others. The best odds are the slots. The
worst odds are roulette, excluding the money wheel. Of course,
if your going to play the money wheel, you might as well just
pull a couple $20's out of your pocket and set fire to them. :^>
Bull~_who's headed for A.C. on Wednesday
|
114.111 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Mar 18 1991 14:14 | 6 |
| � Here you are using your sports knowledge to prognosticate.
Sorta like using my yacht to pick up chicks. hey?
Mike JN
|
114.112 | Impossible | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Mon Mar 18 1991 14:22 | 27 |
| � Counting cards, yes. Playing halfway into eight decks, you'd have to
� be a genius, though.
Either a genius or the "Rain Man", Raymond Babbitt.
My father, a high school math teacher, taught John Scarne's son, oh, about
15 years or so ago. John Scarne was one of the world's foremost experts
on all kinds of gambling and card games. He wrote "Scarne On Cards" and
"Scarne On Gambling" which are just about the "bibles" of that industry.
His hands were filmed doing the card tricks and stunts on the train in the
Redford-Newman movie "The Sting".
Mr. Scarne was banned from most casinos in the world. He was an expert
card counter and he was of the opinion that no human being was capable of
counting a six (or more ...) deck shoe.
Most of the casinos in Vegas and Atlantic City use a six deck shoe *plus*
the dealer always cuts the first six cards off the top of the newly
shuffled shoe and discards them. This is supposed to stop even the best
card counters dead in their tracks.
Bob Hunt
P.S. Young John Scarne used to keep our family entertained with tales of
his father's exploits for hours on end. Once, Mr. Scarne had to see a
doctor for some tests and the unknowing doctor wanted to test his hands
and gave him a couple of fifty-cent pieces to finger. Poof. Gone.
|
114.113 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Mar 18 1991 14:35 | 14 |
| � The worst odds are roulette, excluding the money wheel.
If you play the Red and the Black you have a 48% chance of winning [ 0
and 00 are green ] (pretty good odds compared to most gambling games)
I always liked craps, and have always read that this is the game with
the most favorable odds for the bettor, with Blackjack being next.
Mike JN
the bettor was in this game (I forget the rationale), and that Blackjack
was the next game most favoring the bettor.
Mike JN
|
114.114 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Mar 18 1991 14:38 | 6 |
| � and gave him a couple of fifty-cent pieces to finger.
Is it okay if I don't comment on this?
Mike JN
|
114.115 | UNLV B-Ball = Miami Football | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Mon Mar 18 1991 14:38 | 1 |
|
|
114.116 | | CAM::WAY | Daylight come and me wan' go home | Mon Mar 18 1991 14:45 | 16 |
| Well, I can't say much about gambling because all I ever do is
lose a roll or two of quarters in the slot machines.
However, one of the fellows on the team tends to make money at
blackjack pretty regularly. He plays at a table till he wins,
then immediately moves to another table.
He doesn't win MAJOR bucks, but will make between $40 and $50
a night when things are going good.
Quite honestly, gambling scares me, because when I win I get a
BIG rush, and I have a feeling that I could be one of those
compulsive gamblers if I ever seriously pursued it as a pastime.
'Saw
|
114.117 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Mar 18 1991 15:01 | 3 |
| > -< UNLV B-Ball = Miami Football >-
Yes, they're both awesome teams. :^)
|
114.118 | A previous life | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Rah! Rah! Bronx! Go, Bronx! | Mon Mar 18 1991 15:06 | 8 |
| > -< No problem? Why you still working at DEC, Dan? >-
The margin is too small, the expected swings are too exasperrating and
the zero-sum theory with the casino having slightly deeper pockets than
I do. Depending on what kind of count you are using, you're
overestimating the difficulty of counting into multiple decks.
Dan
|
114.119 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Mon Mar 18 1991 16:59 | 4 |
| Dan, you still haven't answered me...how'd your boy whiney-face do this
weekend?
JoJ
|
114.120 | Went through 3 teething rings. I coulda been at point for Duke to win... | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Rah! Rah! Bronx! Go, Bronx! | Mon Mar 18 1991 17:38 | 1 |
|
|
114.121 | MSU-Utah was a great game, to bad Utah won. | ANGLIN::KIRKMAN | Yeah, I get StarTrek jokes. | Mon Mar 18 1991 20:22 | 10 |
| re: 102
You must have been too close to one of the school's areas. Here in
Wisconsin they showed nealy all of the MSU-Utah game.
It was great to finally watch MSU, (my alma-matter). And I really
dodged a bullet here. After I go mouthing off about UW-Green Bay,
the NCAA goes and matches MSU up against them. TG MSU won that one.
Commander Scott
|
114.122 | | FDCV06::KING | Jesse's Jets! | Tue Mar 19 1991 07:49 | 5 |
| Dean SMith has gone to the final 16 11 straight times.. Homw many time
in that streak did he make the final 4? ANd hom many times did he win
it all???
Rick
|
114.123 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Tue Mar 19 1991 08:41 | 5 |
| PJ is 8-2 in tourny play with Seton Hall. Or is it 9-2 now...
The Hall will crush Arizona.
JoJ
|
114.124 | | CAM::WAY | Daylight come and me wan' go home | Tue Mar 19 1991 08:49 | 3 |
| � The Hall will crush Arizona.
Seton Hall stars in the new flick "Crushing Arizona".....
|
114.125 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Mar 19 1991 09:53 | 11 |
| > re: 102
>
> You must have been too close to one of the school's areas. Here in
> Wisconsin they showed nealy all of the MSU-Utah game.
I just figured being here in a WAC city (Colo. Spgs.) they would show
a WAC team. On Saturday they didn't show us the BYU game either, but
the reason there was becasue a Big 8 team was playing opposite them.
Joe
|
114.126 | Toughie | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Tue Mar 19 1991 14:15 | 9 |
| >Seton Hall stars in the new flick "Crushing Arizona".....
Which reminds me of a sports-related movie trivia question.
Name the sports figure who had a role in "Raising Arizona". Bonus
points for naming another movie he played in that starred an
ex-M*A*S*H star.
Dan
|
114.127 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Tue Mar 19 1991 14:18 | 5 |
| Randall "Tex" Cobb, The Rider of the Apocalypse.
Ya got me on the second part, though.
--dan'l
|
114.128 | Nice job, dan'l | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Tue Mar 19 1991 14:22 | 1 |
|
|
114.129 | Gimme back that baby, you warthog from hell | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Tue Mar 19 1991 15:40 | 3 |
| M*A*S*H ... the film or the television series ???
Bob Hunt
|
114.130 | 1st half freakout; 2nd half sublimity | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 19 1991 15:55 | 27 |
| Though the reporter who axed Bob about FSU's "athleticism" took a
shot during the pregame press conference, he looked like a genius
during the first half of the FSU vs. IU game. At one point during
the first half:
* FSU was on a pace for 40 offensive rebounds
* FSU was on a a pace for 20 steals
* FSU was leading by 11 and with any kinda luck on the rolls
woulda been up by 20 and going away.
They were taller, stronger, and quicker. Indiana, shorter, weaker,
and slower, was so intimidated that at their nadir they had trouble
completing passes or getting a defensive rebound.
Then, Bob called time out. He benched "center" Matt Nover for good,
made adjustments to slice the 3-2 zone, and laid out a plan to plug
the lanes on the board-crashing FSU widebody studs.
Cain you spell "38 point turnaround?"
I wonder what woulda happened if Dale Brown had been coaching IU
that night.
If Indiana only had a center and one reserve forward, they'd have
a shot at UNLV's Runnin' Professionals...
Big10 Tom
|
114.131 | No more | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Tue Mar 19 1991 16:01 | 3 |
| TV series, Bob. Hint: Trapper John...low budget, but excellent film.
Dan
|
114.132 | | CAM::WAY | Daylight come and me wan' go home | Tue Mar 19 1991 16:44 | 3 |
| What Sport did Randall play? Football no doubt, but where?
'Saw
|
114.133 | Man with no nose | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Tue Mar 19 1991 16:46 | 4 |
| Here's a double hint, 'Saw. Randall played a role in ending one of
Howard Cosell's gigs.
Dan
|
114.134 | | CAM::WAY | Daylight come and me wan' go home | Tue Mar 19 1991 16:53 | 6 |
| Whoa, Dan, I'm hazy on that...
I'd say that Randall played football for the Dallas Cowboys. I'm probably
wrong, and I KNOW I should know better, but don't.....
'Saw
|
114.135 | Ah, but did Dan'l catch the duplicity of the hint? | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Tue Mar 19 1991 16:58 | 7 |
| Larry Holmes hit Cobb about 500 times right on the button, but
couldn't even come close to knocking him down. Legs never even
wobbled. Howard spent most of the fight saying that Cobb has no chance
and it should be stopped, decried the brutality of the sport, and never
announced another pro fight.
Dan
|
114.136 | | CAM::WAY | Daylight come and me wan' go home | Wed Mar 20 1991 09:19 | 3 |
| Oh, then Dan I was *really* off the mark.
Cobb is a mean looking sucker, ain't he? But he's one of my favs....
|
114.137 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Wed Mar 20 1991 10:41 | 3 |
| I thought Cobb did some Pro Wrestling.
Mike JN
|
114.138 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Mar 21 1991 15:58 | 9 |
| No, as I understand it, Cobb was quite an accomplished kick boxer. One
of the best in the world. {Well at least in the Top 20}.
The fact he was even in the ring against Holmes is another chapter in
the sorry Great White Dope saga which includes the immortal Duane
Bobbick and the greate Chuck Wepner.
Rich
|
114.139 | Cobb was a champ | JURAN::MCKAY | | Thu Mar 21 1991 18:55 | 5 |
| I believe at one time Cobb was PKA heavyweight champion. I was
him fight a few times and was suprosed at how nimble he was
for a big man.
Jimbo
|
114.140 | Bobby's going to have to work magic again | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Baseball = Hi-Bore-Nation Season ;^( | Thu Mar 21 1991 22:11 | 9 |
|
Hey BA here's the scores so far
final Arkansas 93 Alabama 70
FINAL SETON HALL 81 Zona 77 HIP HIP HORRAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1 st half Kansas 26 Indiana 9....
mike
|
114.141 | Thanks! | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | The lady is 2 tough 2 tame! | Thu Mar 21 1991 22:17 | 16 |
| Thanks...I was looking for them!
B.A.
<<< Note 114.140 by MAXWEL::CHILDS "Baseball = Hi-Bore-Nation Season ;^(" >>>
-< Bobby's going to have to work magic again >-
Hey BA here's the scores so far
final Arkansas 93 Alabama 70
FINAL SETON HALL 81 Zona 77 HIP HIP HORRAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1 st half Kansas 26 Indiana 9....
mike
|
114.142 | LETS GO PIRATES!!!!! | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Thu Mar 21 1991 22:28 | 15 |
| Mike, ya beat me to it.
Way to go PIRATES. Dehere was awesome tonight. Interesting move by PJ;
keeping Taylor on the bench for most of the last 5 minutes, then
bringing him in at crunch time.
That's as big a win as you are gonna see in the tourny, unless the Hall
knocks off UNLV and gets to the final four.
What great poise and confidence the Hall showed tonight. They actually
out-rebounded Arizona.
Just a great game all around. Even better with the Hall winning.
JoSH
|
114.143 | Didn't see much of 2nd game, too busy watching co-ed's pom-poms | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Fri Mar 22 1991 00:43 | 26 |
| Well, it's 12:30 AM and I just returned from the Charlotte Colesium.
The final scores of both games don't indicate just how exciting they
were. Here are a few observations:
Arkansas only won because they were the less sloppy of the two teams.
Both they and Bama put on an exhibition of non-stop turn overs and
endless scrambles for the ball.
Oliver Miller is f___ing HUGE!!! You really don't appreciate it until
you see him in person. He moves that 275+ pounds pretty well...and
he's the only one who can move it...once he's in the lane, no one bumps
him out.
Baily will lead Indiana to a national title before his four years
are up in Hoosierville. He is the total basketball machine. Trouble
was, tonight he ran into a Kansas team that could do no wrong.
Everything went the Jayhawks' way. Loose balls bounced right into
their hands and the 3-pointers rained everytime Indiana came within 10
points.
The best part about Kansas' win is that there was this Kansas co-ed
four seats over from me. I'm looking forward to her huge, bouncing
pom-poms again on Saturday afternoon. Shoulda taken me up on that
ticket, Bob Hunt. You'da been right next to 'em!
--dan'l
|
114.144 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Un Rosalind der schplat | Fri Mar 22 1991 11:21 | 101 |
| Well, last nights West Regionals were pretty darn good. The Seton Hall
- Arizona game was great! Zona came out and went up 8-0 - the UNLV
fans and the Zona fans were already argueing around me about the final
- when the hall went on a 14-3 run to shut everyone up. I said to the
UNLV fans around me that the Zona guards would not be able to stop the
Hall's guards - and I was right. Dehere abused Otick and Muehlebach.
The Zona guards are a bit slow, and very, very tentative. They seem
afraid to drive down the damn zone.
Brian Williams is a good player, but a huge crybaby. Sickening
spectacle everytime he gets touched or whistled. I was glad to see him
sulking on the sidelines during the UNLV-Utah game.
THe Hall almost blew it a few times with sloppy play. Walker was Mr.
Stone hands all night. Avent really played well.
The Arizona fans were shocked. Too funny.
The Utah-UNLV game was entertaining. Utah hung in for the first half,
but for some insane reason came out chucking threes (and missing) in
the second half, and UNLV pulled away. The Rebels better wake up, or
they are going to get bounced from this tourney.
OBSERVATIONS:
The kingdome isn't bad to watch a game, though the arena does eat
sound.
Josh Grant of Utah is a fine player. Moves with a natural grace that
reminds one of a gazelle. Great passer. You'd never know he's 6'10"
by the way he moves. Utah's center, Watts - is the ultimate wide body
- he's built like a nose tackle. He and Larry Johnson had some great
battles underneath. After those two, Utah's talent level falls way off
- even though they must have TOnga's greatest hoop player, Paul Afeaki,
playing for them.
Greg Anthoney is out of control. He played a very selfish game. Tark
benched all the starters but Johnson in the 1st half, playing a team
that looked like it was composed of the ball boys and team towell boy.
The Rebs were sleep walking. Larry Johnson got away with bloody murder
underneath - and using my stopwatch, I timed him on 6 occassions in the
lane for 5 or more seconds. As the rebel fans told me "He was eating
his lunch in there!"
Arizona's weakness is at guard. Great front line, but the guards have
to go. Tentative, slow, whiney.
Seton Hall - Missed two dunks, and made a few other mistakes that the
cannot repeat on Saturday if they want to beat UNLV.
The FANS:
Arizona - YUPPIES. Hundreds of them.
Seton Hall - only a few made the trip - mostly parents. The Hall
became the darling of the 'love the underdogs' crowd.
Utah - Great fans, happy to be there. Had the feeling they'd get beat,
but not one of them got up to leave, even when the Utes went down by 20
late in the game. Love Majuris.
UNLV - Fans from Hell. Old, frumpy women dressed in Red from top to
bottom. I thought I stepped into the middle of Hunter Thompson's "Fear
and Loathing in Las Vegas". Half of 'em looked like refugees from a
tour bus exploring America's favorite stalagmite farms. Mean spirited
- hate Lute Olsen - cussing him out after Zona got beat. Highly
confident - already making plans for the Final Four, cause they know
the Hall caint beat them.
I did sit near some 'real' UNLV fans who knew hoops. They said they
are scared of playing Big East and Big 10 teams, but not the ACC.
WHY? Cause they said the ACC plays wimp ball - like Duke did last
year, and the Rebels will kill them. They said the Big East and Big 10
play tough defense, and have better big game coaches than the ACC!
They said they were nervous about playing PJ's squad - and didn't want
to meet Indiana (Direct quote: If Indiana makes the Final Four,
they'll probably beat us - Knight will kill Tark one-on-one coaching)
And they don't want to meet Ohio State.
They said Arkasas would be a dream rematch.
I asked about UNC. They laughed. They said they'd score 120 vs the
Tarheels and that it would be no contest. They said "Heck, even Tark's
a better big game coach than Dean SMith!" I was rollward.
CHEERLEADERS:
The UNLV cheerleaders are out of this world. Totally. They made the
other teams cheerleaders look like a midwest high school prep squad.
These women have talent, poise, and simply amazing attributes and
titles. The Utah cheerleaders were not bad (The UNLV guys behing me
were critiquing the Cheerleders: Seton Hall - tough looking eastern
girls, Arizona - Yuppie bride-to-be's; Utah - Nice and wholesome - heck
they're probably still virgins (as one guy put it) - and finally the
UNLV cheerleaders - they said they know how to keep a smile on folks
faces - and they called them the 'meat cleavers'.)
JD
|
114.145 | Better to be there than to watch CBS | PENSAR::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Fri Mar 22 1991 11:45 | 17 |
| Thanks Dan'l and JD for those on scene reports. Makes me feel like I
was there. Sorry,I can't reciprocate at the Meadowlands tonight. )-:
You guys were lucky that you didn't have to watch another terrible
performance by CBS last night. What was particularly galling was those
interminable commercial spots they did while switching between games.
CBS missed so many opportunities to switch back like I know ESPN would
have done,because of their insatiable lust for commercials. As for
announcing,Buckner was okay except he couldn't hide his pro-Indiana
bias. Cunningham was very inconsistent,he made some good points,but
often his mind was somewhere else. I hate when guys who don't do
college all year are brought in to do the tournament.
About Seton Hall: Interesting coaching decision by PJ last night,giving
freshman Caver so much PT. JD,was it possible that Williams only
committed one foul? He seemed to be pushing all over the place.
|
114.146 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Un Rosalind der schplat | Fri Mar 22 1991 12:04 | 13 |
| Dave,
Williams getting only one foul was one of the howlers of the evening.
He was pushing, shoving, grabbing and hacking - and over-the-backing -
and yet never getting whistled. And when he did get whistled, he cried
about it. Unreal.
in both games last night, the refs were shakey on many calls.
Inconsistency was the word of the evening. They missed two painfully
obvious goal tends on Arizona - one was shown on instant replay and
everyone in the place started booing the refs.
JD
|
114.147 | CBS has had Sweet Sixteen before | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Fri Mar 22 1991 12:09 | 9 |
| Re: CBS
It doesn't do much good now to complain about how ESPN would have done the
broadcast. CBS has been doing the Sweet Sixteen, the Regional Finals, and
the Final Four ever since they signed their first but now-expired contract
for the tournament in the early 1980s. This is the first year under the
new deal where they do the entire tournament and ESPN is out completely.
Bob Hunt
|
114.148 | | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Fri Mar 22 1991 12:39 | 11 |
| re: CBS
Since cable TV doesn't reach over the top of Pikes Peak and we haven't
installed satellite yet, I've been "Lucky" to not be spoiled by the
obviously superiority of ESPN. I've thoroughly enjoyed the games so
far on CBS and even somehow have been able to suffer through the
commercials and the Split-screen-from-hell. Surely CBS can't be doing
that bad of a job.
Chilled-out-cowboy-enjoying-squeaky-shoes
|
114.149 | Go St. Johns! | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Fri Mar 22 1991 12:56 | 39 |
| Thanks for the write-ups, JD and dan'l!
Re: coverage. Aww, c'mon it wasn't that bad. There were a few
glitches in Boston, but considering that 4 games were played in the
time span of two, and I came away feeling like I saw three of them,
they did alright. Yes, if all games were on different channels, I'd
probably use my clicker differently than CBS, but given that I had a
real sense of what happened in 3 games, I gotta give CBS some credit.
Complaints: the studio scene isn't adding much. As much as I like
Mike, he doesn't have enough time there to get into things as he does
on radio. At least he found a suit that fits, even though it's a
house.
They cut away from the Hall game to show the tipoff of Indiana. For
what purpose? They cut away from the UNLV game totally without notice
right to the Indiana game, and then back again, without notice, a few
minutes later. They ought to keep everyone informed, including the
announcers.
I like listening to the on-court mikes when they seem to turn them up
during foul shots. Give me more of that, CBS.
As for the games, PJ gave the Hall every chance to win, and win they
did. Played Walker for big minutes, kept his big people out of foul
trouble, and obviously had them laying off on the gimme's, unlike Big
East action. And gave it to the guards when it counted.
I think the opposition is getting up higher for UNLV than is being
given credit. They keep winning, don't they? UNLV-Hall should be a
thriller.
Everyone was figuring Kansas-IU as an even matchup, but IU players
(aside from Damon) were disappearing for long stretches and made plenty
of unforced errors. The KU backcourt and small forward positions badly
outplayed their IU counterparts, where it was perceived IU had their
strength.
Dan
|
114.150 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Un Rosalind der schplat | Fri Mar 22 1991 13:24 | 22 |
| More about last night.
What impressed me about Vegas was the play of Spencer and Eckles. Both
hit big shots, and got HUGE offensive boards and follow up hoops - plus
SPencer got some nice defensive plays. These guys seem to pick up the
slack when the Fab Four struggle at all.
Funny moment was when Anthoney brushed his shoulder on Mr. Wide-Body,
Watts of Utah, and gave him the cold stare. I thought Watts was going
to start laughing. The Rebel fans were cracking up. Watts was really
big.
The key for the Hall will be their guards keeping their cool under the
Vegas pressure, teh ablitity of Dehere to stay hot, and the ability of
their big men to avoid foul trouble vs. Johnson and the boys inside.
Vegas likes to come out and have Hunt/Augman/Anthoney hit a few threes
early, then go inside to Johnson. If you can avoid giving them the
easy three, you can stay in it. Vegas gets undisciplined and
frustrated if things don't go their way.
JD
|
114.151 | Go Seton Hall! | ROULET::BARBIERI | God can be so appreciated! | Fri Mar 22 1991 13:26 | 40 |
| Hi,
In a friendly pool, I picked Seton Hall to go all the way
as I figured UNLV would be too hard (require getting too
many early games right).
Do they have a chance? What do ya think? Man, I don't know.
IF they can get by UNLV, wow!!
As for officiating, remember the jump ball call?!!! Can you
BELIEVE it? The guy was laying down with the ball and an
Arizona guy grabs him by the neck and yanks him around and
they call jump ball!! Unbelievable!
It was a nervous game for me. I wanted Seton Hall, but from
my vantage point, Arizona's field goals came too easy. That
front court often dropped in easy close ones. But, the Hall
sure is scrappy and they just have the look (as they did two
years ago) of a team that simply does not choke.
There were a couple plays that really bummed me out. One time
A Seton Hall guy had a def. rebound right in his hands. He lost
control of the ball and Arizona got it for an easy basket. Then
the Hall turned it over trying to pass it out and Arizona scored
again. BOOM, 4 point play! Another time a missed stuff was
instead an easy transition basket for Arizona.
Anyway, go HALL and man if they hang close I wouldn't want to
be ANYBODY defending Dehere (sp?) with the ball. He can seem
to stop at will and score from anywhere. And I would not want
to be coaching against Carlessimo in a tight game either. I'll
bet the Shark sure doesn't want a close one against the Hall!
Ya just gotta love Seton Hall! (What a cool name for a school!
Where in New Jersey are they located BTW?)
I look forward to any replies on how people think they can do
against UNLV.
Tony
|
114.152 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Fri Mar 22 1991 13:26 | 18 |
| > They cut away from the UNLV game totally without notice
> right to the Indiana game, and then back again, without notice, a few
> minutes later. They ought to keep everyone informed, including the
> announcers.
I saw that, and I think it was just a screwup. They wouldn't just jump
from game to game like that without informing the audience. Heck,
sometimes they must think we're a bunch of fans who never watch
basketball, because they're still putting up those captions that tell
us who's who:
ALABAMA IN RED
ARKANSAS IN WHITE
Duh, gee, thanks. Uh, I just figured the teams's name on the unies
didn't mean anything.
Joe
|
114.153 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Fri Mar 22 1991 14:03 | 16 |
| Based on the times I've seen each team play this year, I really don't
think Seton Hall has much of a chance. I know they are playing better
ball now than they have all year, but UNLV seems unstoppable.
Every game I've seen UNLV play, it's not like they come out and try to
beat another team 120 to 47 (in other words, not a Houston Football, or
Oklahoma Basketball mentality). They come out, and crash the boards, and
pass the ball around, everybody gets some shots, has a little fun, and
when the other team gets close, they go on a 10 - 15 point tear.
UNLV can be beat, but I think it's going to take some good luck for the
opposing team, some bad luck for UNLV, some help from the refs, and
EVERYBODY on the opposing team is going to really have to play out of
their ass.
Mike JN
|
114.154 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Mar 22 1991 14:28 | 3 |
| Seton Hall is in South Orange, NJ, I believe.
John
|
114.155 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:42 | 6 |
| Seton Hall is definitely in South Orange, NJ.
It's original location was in Madison, NJ....but that was before any of
our times (except maybe LeE).
JoJ
|
114.156 | Boston folks get screwed by CBS!!!!! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Sat Mar 23 1991 11:42 | 48 |
| SHEEYITTT!!!!!
<set mode==:anger to the max>
I still haven't simmered down too much with what the local CBS (channel
7) affiliate did lasted(tm) night.
First, I was a bit frosted that CBS had intended to begin broadcasting
at 8:00 and show the SJU game in progress but what the heck, that's
life.
Then at 8:00 I plopped down into my swivel chair, had 2 ice cold
brewskie's standing by and flicked on the TV. To my chagrin, at 8:01
the station dorks voice say's, "We'll be resuming our regular scheduled
broadcast at 8:30 after this special......". Then those rating
grabbing, sensationalist - broadcasting b*stards jumped into "The
Trial"!!! Needless to say, I was livid and went nuclear!
<background info>
About 1.5 years ago, the FCC came out with some kind of rule that
allowed cable companies to delete quasi-repetitive stations from their
offering. In the Worcester area, that meant that the R.I. station
equivalent's to the Boston guys were dropped and I lost access to the
Providence CBS afiliates. Hence, only the Boston CBS was available to
me.
After cussing enuf to make a sailor blush, my wife decided that it was
time to make tracks and she and Greg hoofed it upstars to avoid hurting
their ears. Then I went looking for whereever I stashed my rabbit ears
to try to yank out the cable and try to get the RI station. In the
meantime, I called Boston CBS and was obviously too kind as I voiced
my displeasure since they didn't reverse their decison. Damm, I's
like to letter bomb the a**hole who had *NO* symapthy. As a matter of
fact, he was bloody arrogant with the *tough sH*t sport* attitude.
Couldn't find the antenna...
At 8:30, BBall was shown and by that time, SJU had something like a
18-20 point lead; the freekin game was already over!!!!!!(IMO)
^&$!$&^%!$#*&^%!*&$!@&###*@#!#)~
ARGHHHHHH!
I'm very, very pleased they won but DAMMM, I wanted to watch they game.
How does one seek/obtain revenge against Ch. 7?
KLev
|
114.157 | Duke should but I STILL think SJU WILL!!!! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Sat Mar 23 1991 12:03 | 37 |
| First off, I want to congratulate LOUIEEE and the boys for an excellent
tournament so far. They managed to overcome the SI cover jinx and win
against OSU. Now we're in the "super 8". Who wudda thunk it????
LOUIEE's been doing a great job in preparing the guys for each game and
I thought that I'd share some of my thoughts about the Duke game on
tomorrow and invite comments.
First, I have a gut feeling this is the last game of the year for the
Redmen but I'm gonna do a novena tonight to keep them alive ;*)
If Duke hits the 3's like they did last night, it'll be over quick.
If they don't, SJU MIGHT take it.
Malik's gotta have a awesome game and Werdann's got to neutralize
Laetner (stay within 5 points of him). Both centers are 6'11" and can
play.
I hope Buchanan's eye is OK. He got a good poke in last night's game.
I think SJU's frontcourt vs Duke's frontcourt is almost even, advantage
Duke because of their 3 pt. potential (cancel's out Hurley's mistakes)
Backcourt? Advantage SJU because of Malik and the wide bodies LOUIEEE
has.
Center? Duke (Laetner - a better all-around player) Sorry Rob....
Coaching? very, very slight advantage Mike K. He (IMHO) is more
imaginative when it comes to adapting.
If both teams play as they are normally capable and we don't have too
much whistle stuff (early), once the players get into a groove, I see
the winning margin <4 points. Should be a GREAT game!!!!!
Good Luck Redmen!!!
Kev
|
114.158 | I thins its the Redmen in a close one.... | POCUS::SALTALAMACCH | | Sat Mar 23 1991 13:20 | 13 |
| Kev, the Redmen do have a real good chance vs. Duke. Last year's game
was a good indication.....we lost Boo; they lost Ala, Henderson and
Brickey.
The Redmen are primed to win.
(How's that for this pessimistic Redmen sort!!)
I think Duke is ready to miss the Final Four this year, right now,
tomorrow, vs,. SJU. I'm on the bandwagon!
Redmen Phil
|
114.159 | That's what I'm wishing for....GO LOUIEEEEEE | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Sat Mar 23 1991 16:58 | 17 |
| Phil,
I think we are in the same jury box. LOUIEEE and the boys DO have a
real good *chance* to win but if we get realistic for minute, I think
we are both respectfully aware of Duke & ALL their waepons.
Last year was ancient history. This year is now. IMO, we've gotten
this far because of LOUIEEE's ability to keep the troops motivated and
ready to play (granted we DO have a few capable horses).
I have a foreboding feeling about the game but nonetheless,
I airn't ready to concede defeat!!!
SJU is Gonna Win ( in a nail bite "r )
|
114.160 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Go for 1000% more | Sun Mar 24 1991 19:44 | 10 |
| What a couple of boring games. Arkansas-Kansas was pretty good at
times, although it ended up a blow out. UNLV and Duke won in games that
would have been stopped if they were boxing matches. Only the
UNC-Temple game had any excitment to it. I guess if you were a fan of
one of the winning teams, you enjoyed it. But it seems to me that the
Final Four is close to becoming another Super Bowl type of event, ie
the hype doesn't live up to the game.
Dennis
|
114.161 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Sun Mar 24 1991 21:29 | 8 |
| I think Duke has a legit shot at beating UNLV, but I doubt they will.
UNLV is very tough. Much tougher than I thought. They're awesome at
every position.
Sorry to see the Redmen go down this afternoon. I think Louie should
have worn the hunter sweater....
JoJ
|
114.162 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Sun Mar 24 1991 21:30 | 7 |
| Oh yeah, I almost forgot....
Hey Dan, did ya catch your buddy, "Whiney Face" today? He poured in 20
points and was named Regional MVP. Just thought you'd be glad to hear
that.
JoJ
|
114.163 | Injuries and bad calls did us in- not Duke ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Sun Mar 24 1991 21:40 | 16 |
|
One can only ponder what might have been had Buchanan not been called
for 3 fouls in the first 7 minutes of the game and Werdann's
injury(ies?) not kept him out of the "core" part of the game.....
Damm...
(maybe I should say "Rats" instead?)
:*(
JoJ - I don't think Duke has the players to do it although I'd like
to see them pull it off.
more later, still haven't gotten over the disappointment,
Kev
|
114.164 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Mar 25 1991 08:56 | 2 |
| Don't blame CBS for cutting to the trial - sounds like it was a local
decision to me.
|
114.165 | agreed, Boston CBS is to BLAM(tm)!!!!!! | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Mon Mar 25 1991 09:40 | 10 |
| Mac,
IMO it's immaterial who made the decision and I agree it
was probably the local management - that's why I called Boston
to b*tch and not NYC.
Nonetheless, it (the decision) still sucked. I mean, its not as if
there had been NO coverage of the trial during the last 2 weeks.
Kev
|
114.166 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Kenya Roools again | Mon Mar 25 1991 10:52 | 56 |
| First - Congrats to the Final 4 teams.
Second - SJU-Duke was a game decided early - especially be the refs
whistle. Do you know that Duke was only whistled for 10 fouls the
*WHOLE* game. ANd 3 or 4 of them came late in the second half.
Totally bogus. SJU got called for hand checks, while Hurley can bump
with the body - oh well. SJU turned the ball over too much. That's
life. Never expected them to make the final 8.
Duke will get crushed by UNLV. Hurley will get eaten alive. Hill will
get eaten alive. Laetner will be destroyed. Coach K will continue to
be a man who can get them to the show, but can't get them any further.
Duke's a waste of a Final Four spot - you know they are never goin to
win.
Seton Hall-UNLV - well the crowd was overwhelmingly pro-UNLV. Before
the game, the consensus was that UNLV was going to the FInal FOur - the
hall didn't have a chance. First half was good, but the beginning of
the 2nd half was doom for the Pirates. IMO, PJ made a bad move - he
should have called a TO right away when he say that UNLV had upped the
pressure. The BIG mistake PJ made was in the 1st half - Larry Johnson
got 2 fouls in the first 6 minutes - and instead of attacking him, the
Pirates avoided him. Not that it would've mattered. After Larry
Johnson's second foul, the refs didn't whistle a foul vs. Vegas for a
little over 11 minutes. No way a team plays bump and grind defense,
crashes the boardss like Vegas without committing a foul.
Had a good time with the Vegas guys behind me. They were laughing
about how the refs never call Johnson for 3 seconds, or Spencer or
Eckles for over the back. We used the stopwatch on Johnson in the
paint - there were *FIVE* straight UNLV possessions where he hung out
in the paint for 5 seconds or more (the highest was 8.7 seconds). He
scored on 4 of them. The refs seem afraid to call 3 seconds or over
the back anymore. It's a shame.
Consensus by the UNLV fans was that the only way UNLV would lose is if
either Coach K or Dean SMith were able to pocket the referees if they
met. Said the refs are wimps when it comes to calling fouls against
them 'nice' boys from Duke and UNC.
All 3 guys were heading for Indy for the Final Four. THey were hoping
for a rematch with Duke (We'll blow 'em out again) - said the players
and the fans hate Duke because of Duke's fans. "A bunch of spoiled
little Yuppie larvae" as one of 'em said.
Talked about UNLV and image. Said look, the NCAA doesn't give a crap
if a guy from a 'nice' school slap around a women or beats up a women
(talking about King Rice) - but they do care if the players make phone
calls from their room and don't pay for 'em. Go figure.
At the end of the game, the Hall cheerleaders and band started chanting
"We'll be back, we'll be back". The guys behind me started chanting
"No threepeat, no threepeat, Probation Looms, Probation Looms" Too
funny.
JD
|
114.167 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Buckle Up Wade! | Mon Mar 25 1991 12:07 | 6 |
| I saw Snuffy last night on ESPN saying how Kansas coach Williams
knows UNC's talent better than he knows Kansas' talent because Willians
recruited some of the UNC players. That'll be a new excuse that ACCaught
can add to the "excuse arsenal".
/Don
|
114.168 | And Ise hates smurfs! | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Mon Mar 25 1991 13:11 | 6 |
|
If Dean Smif was blue he'd look just like a smurf!
Steve
|
114.169 | Livid was I. And I couldn't get Ch. 6 in Acton... | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Mon Mar 25 1991 13:27 | 17 |
| >Then those rating
>grabbing, sensationalist - broadcasting b*stards jumped into "The
>Trial"!!! Needless to say, I was livid and went nuclear!
You and me both, Kev. Hang this one on WHDH. I turned it on about
8:03, and had no idea what was going on...if they were breaking to the
game any minute or not. By the time I figured out that this was more
trial bullshit, I started calling them, but it was always busy. When
the SJU/OSU game was over, I called again and got through. The news
director gave me the program director's number, which he said will be
answered during business hours. I'll bring in the # and post it.
I told him this was an inexcusable decision, considering that they are
the only source for the NCAAs and that this "news" story had already
been sensationalized to death on every media outlet there was.
Dan
|
114.170 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Mar 25 1991 13:29 | 1 |
| I thought there were more important things in life than sports ;^)
|
114.171 | I'm telling ya, the whole affair is sick... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 25 1991 13:40 | 7 |
|
> I thought there were more important things in life than sports ;^)
Yeah, sex and violence-- and that's what Channel 7 gave us!
glenn
|
114.172 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Mon Mar 25 1991 15:26 | 15 |
| re: JD
I was wondering why Johnson never got called for three seconds
also...seemed like he just camped out in the paint. Not that it would
have made a difference on the outcome.
re: Dan
Still waiting to hear your reply regarding your buddy, Bobby
"whiney_face" Hurley. Was he as good as I said he would be? Lemme help
ya....YES.
Hope you enjoyed it.
JOJ
|
114.173 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Mon Mar 25 1991 15:42 | 17 |
| Hey JoJ....
This incredible thing happened to me this weekend.
At one point, I was sitting down for some coffee and the morning
paper. I flipped on the TV, and did some remote control roulette,
when all of a sudden I stopped on this Lifetime channel, and there
was this re-run TV Series called "Day by Day".
Anyway, lo and behold, the father comes into the kitchen, and it's
none other than JOJ. Uncanny likeness.
So, JoJ, you can come clean now. How long have you been moonlighting
as an actor, and does your manager know and approve of these little
extracurricular activities????
'Saw
|
114.174 | Don'cha just love coaches sons? | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Mon Mar 25 1991 16:54 | 10 |
| JoJ, Whiney-Face Hurley will show his true colors on Saturday. Be
there. Aloha.
BTW, where was Jack Craig blasting WHDH-WV (Ch. 7 Boston, CBS
affiliate) in yesterday's column???
I figure it was the most horrendous network sports-related decision of
the year, and Jack doesn't even mention it!?!
Dan
|
114.175 | Don't the NFL contracts, for example, require broadcasting? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 25 1991 17:21 | 18 |
|
> I figure it was the most horrendous network sports-related decision of
> the year, and Jack doesn't even mention it!?!
He probably writes that Sunday column on Thursday or something... I'm
sure we'll hear all about it, complete with the rationale from some
dweeby station manager. (Actually, I think Craig mentioned it in
advance in the Friday paper-- I know I heard about it somewhere before
I tuned in...)
Fact of the matter is, that special's ratings probably cleaned up over
what the game would have done, but I'd like to see the network play
hardball and require exclusivity for the *entire* tournament coverage.
You want to interrupt the second round coverage, fine, then you aren't
going to televise the final game. End of story...
glenn
|
114.176 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | March Madness is here!! | Tue Mar 26 1991 08:31 | 8 |
| FrankWa, I never heard of "Day by Day"...honest....
But just think of how happy that actor would be if you contacted him
and pointed out how much he resembles me.
He'd be thrilled !!!
JoJ
|
114.177 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Tue Mar 26 1991 08:37 | 19 |
| > But just think of how happy that actor would be if you contacted him
> and pointed out how much he resembles me.
>
> He'd be thrilled !!!
hhahahahahahahaha!
You're too funny JoJ....
DBD was a sitcom starring you, and Linda Kelsey as the parents. She
ran a day care/nursery school in the home. Courtney Thorne-Smith,
late of LA Law (the laker girl) was the assistant. Forget who played
the son, the Julia Louis Dreyfus from SNL played the highbrown neighbor...
It was a OK series. I just used to watch it for glimpses of Courtney!
(sigh)....
'Saw
|
114.178 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 26 1991 08:44 | 11 |
| I see the Ch.7 problem as partially cable related. I can't believe
that here in Worcester we can get 3 NBC affilliates and only 1 of each
of CBS and ABC. I think local channels should be able to decide what
they want to carry, but in this age of 50 bizillion cable channels
available, you'd think there'd be more of a choice. How many TV
evangelical and home shopping channels do we need?
Like Glenn said, Channel 7 probably didn't really care. With no local
teams in the action, and a highly publicized event like the Smart trial
going on, they figured they'd draw better ratings by dropping the
basketball.
|
114.179 | The disease continues to permeate ::SPORTS... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 26 1991 09:01 | 9 |
|
> DBD was a sitcom starring you, and Linda Kelsey as the parents. She
> ran a day care/nursery school in the home.
Not that guy! We're talking serious professional-grade quiche-eating
yuppie! Worse than Alan Thicke even! Say it ain't so, JoJ!
glenn
|
114.180 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Tue Mar 26 1991 09:13 | 10 |
| > Not that guy! We're talking serious professional-grade quiche-eating
> yuppie! Worse than Alan Thicke even! Say it ain't so, JoJ!
Yeah. That's him. IN fact, the family even had a pet golden retriever.
You never saw it much, but they had it...
So did Courtney....(sigh)
'Saw
|
114.181 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Mar 26 1991 09:48 | 9 |
| That's who JoJ looks like? You've got to be joking, n'est pas?
The guy has Yuppie written all over him. Real Dweeb like. Not a man's
man at all....more of a true girley-mon.
Jim, you look like this guy? You sounded normal on the phone.
Rich
|
114.183 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Baseball = Hi-Bore-Nation Season ;^( | Tue Mar 26 1991 10:40 | 11 |
|
Joe Kelly is the JoJ lookalike....I don't see it looks wise but definately
see the lifestyle comparisions...wasn't the series like One Day at Time or
some corney thing like that. Guy quits professional job to run a daycare
center with his wife and then has to hire outside help for guys like Saw..
;^)
love the bitch next door though...
mike
|
114.184 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Tue Mar 26 1991 11:58 | 5 |
| I never saw the turd and JoJ together, but I *DID* see the Dinz and JoJ
together. And, I thought they made a nice couple, except they kept
arguing about which one would wear the moustache. :*)
lEe
|
114.185 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Tue Mar 26 1991 12:09 | 5 |
| � I never saw the turd and JoJ together, but I *DID* see the Dinz and JoJ
� together. And, I thought they made a nice couple, except they kept
� arguing about which one would wear the moustache. :*)
Yeah, and JoJ kept pissing and moaning about Dinz welching on him.....
|
114.186 | you guys.... | PARVAX::WARDLE | Magic,Jordan,JoJ,Hurley | Tue Mar 26 1991 12:57 | 23 |
| First of all, Alan Thicke is a most excellent actor. You can't tell me
you guys didn't dig that house he lived in. It was most excellent.
I still don't know what this show "Day by Day" was all about, but if
they had a Golden Retreiver it must have been a good show.
re: Mike
You cain't accuse me of being a Yuppie....you guys were at my house,
there's nothing yuppie about it....except for the contemporary tiel and
mauve furnishings, the golden retreiver, the wall hangings, the brass
lamps, and the Sony. But that's doesn't really make me a Yuppie. It
just exhibits good taste.
re: Dinz & JoJ
I was totally justified in whining about Jim "Welcher" Dinzmore. The
guy still owes me a case, but he'll never pay. But, I'd be willing to
waive the case if he pays off that other bet he lost where he has to
run through town in his Jock strap.
JoJ
|
114.187 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Tue Mar 26 1991 13:24 | 28 |
| > re: Dinz & JoJ
>
> I was totally justified in whining about Jim "Welcher" Dinzmore. The
> guy still owes me a case, but he'll never pay. But, I'd be willing to
> waive the case if he pays off that other bet he lost where he has to
> run through town in his Jock strap.
Nothing worse in life than a welcher.
See how it happens. First you start welching on little things, like
you won't pay little Timmy Markam the nickel you owe him because the
Mets won the Series over the Orioles. Next thing you know you're
in high school, welching on your friends when you play Bet-A-Buck
at the High School dance.
From there you're an adult, welching on cases of beer you lose when
you make outlandish bets like the Yankees winning the world series.
Finally, you make the ultimate welch when you bet that the Whalers
will beat the Bruins out for the Adams Division crown, and that if
they don't, you'll nude up, put on a jockstrap, and run around
a track.
Just Say No To Welching!
'Saw
|
114.188 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | Magic,Jordan,JoJ,Hurley | Tue Mar 26 1991 14:20 | 4 |
| Hey Frankwa, you ever see Dinz and little Timmy Markam together?
hmmmmm, I wonder.
JoJ
|
114.189 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Kenya Roools again | Wed Mar 27 1991 11:26 | 13 |
| I never saw JOJ's house in Joisey, but I did see it in Colorado. It
was pretty yuppy. Even had a golf course in the back yard off the
patio. JoJ's dog, Biff, had one of those sweaters on cause as JOJ told
me "The night mountain air causes his hair to curl a tad much"
He took me on a mini-tour, but when we went into the kitchen, he ran
ahead of me, and slammed a few cabinet doors, and when offering me a
drink, he tried to hide my prying eyes from the contents of the fridge.
I did, however, catch a glimpse of bottles of Evian, Taos, some
goose-liver pate', a big wheel of Brie, some fiddlesticks and endive
and a some Corona Light beer.
JD
|
114.190 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | Magic,Jordan,JoJ,Hurley | Wed Mar 27 1991 11:47 | 4 |
| JD, I think you had them believing you until you mentioned the Corona
Light...nobody drinks that, do they?
JoJ
|
114.191 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Wed Mar 27 1991 12:03 | 12 |
| JD,
Was the Sharper Image catalog anywhere? That's a big clue right there.
And artichokes.. were there any artichokes.
Hmmm, I think we should have a yuppie trial. Just like the old
Salem Witch Trials, and McCarthy's big Commie Hunt, we should have
a SPORTS Yuppie Trial.....
'Saw
|
114.192 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | Magic,Jordan,JoJ,Hurley | Wed Mar 27 1991 12:58 | 13 |
| Frank, since when are artichokes "yuppie-food"? My grandparents are
from Sicily and artichokes were pretty popular in their house...
I think you're way off base with that one, FrankWa...
re: Sharper Image
That's one of my favorite stores. I never bought anything there tho'.
JoJ
PS - If you have a Yuppie trial, let me know what note it's in. I'm
only reading selected topics.
|
114.193 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:38 | 16 |
| � Frank, since when are artichokes "yuppie-food"? My grandparents are
� from Sicily and artichokes were pretty popular in their house...
�
� I think you're way off base with that one, FrankWa...
No way. I mean, at one point in time Brie was a favorite of the
French farmers and cheesemakers who invented it.
It's just that these danged Yuppies get a hold of something, and
nexted thing you know it's tainted....
We're comin' ta get ya JoJ.... the Yuppie Trials are upon you!
8^)
|
114.194 | KU cover of S.I. this week | STA201::MCNIEL | | Wed Mar 27 1991 16:59 | 18 |
| A few observations.
KU vs. North Carolina - It's a jump ball (probably OT)
Give the edge to KU. Why? ***Burp**** Why not?
The Jayhawks have steamrolled two of the three most arrogent
programs in the country. Take out the arrogance... and we'll
probably see a good game in Indy.
DUKE VS. KU in the Finals.
I know I'm probably smokin' my socks on this one...but, an old
Kansas prophet once said:
"Dicipline beats talent in pressure situations."
- Kansas Comet (back again)
|
114.195 | Game Time? | MPGS::BURGESS | | Fri Mar 29 1991 11:25 | 3 |
| Anybody know what time the games are on Saturday?
- Ken -
|
114.196 | Enjoy the day and be home by supper time | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Fri Mar 29 1991 11:28 | 4 |
|
UNC vs Kansas @5:30
Duke vs UNLV @8:00
|
114.197 | That's the Final Four Game I'll be Watching | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Mar 29 1991 12:18 | 3 |
| Boston University vs Northern Michigan at 8PM
John
|
114.198 | What a great day to be alive! | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Sun Mar 31 1991 13:23 | 59 |
| It's Easter Sunday and I haven't stopped smiling since around 11:30
last night. A few observations:
- I watched the game at a friend's house with Bob Hunt and a few
others. During halftime of the second game, I flicked the channel and
we immediatly had some National Geographic type show and they were
hunting and killing sharks. Too much of a coincidence!
- What a night for a UNC hater. Dean gets ejected and Duke beats the
"unbeatable." As Bob Hunt said, I bet they were jumping out of windows
in Chappel Hill. What a baby-blue nightmare!
- King Rice's comments after the game were typical: "The Duke fans
really showed no class today. That was terrible [saying goodbye to
Dean with their 'See Ya' cheer] They have a great program and a great
basketball team, but their fans have no class." That's right, King,
When the chips are down, pick on the defenseless. It's your style.
Glad to see the Dean system as taught you how to be gracious.
- For the record, I don't think either technical was warranted, but
Dean was out of the coach's box and the official enforced the rules.
End of story. However, now Dean Smith has become the biggest martyr in
NCAA history. Everything I've heard about Pete Pavia is prefaced with
"Big-East Official." What does that have to do with it? But the UNC
fans won't let that one die.
- Kansas won. Does anyone even remember this after all the UNC whining
is done? In fact, they won handily.
- Great bench scoring (13 pts) by the deepest bench in the tournament.
Can you spell choke! Yes: S-M-I-T-H.
- Nah, Christian Laettner has no heart. Didn't even want to be there,
did he? Who wrote that in here anyway?
- Larry Johnson's technical might have lost the whole game for UNLV.
No way should you lose your cool with four minutes left in a one point
game. It was the turning point even though Laettner hit only one of
two.
- Duke should beat Kansas because they've played this team three times
already this season except that they were wearing baby blue and were
the perenial underdogs.
- Dean Smith, in case it wasn't clear from the above, choked again.
And he'll be loved even more in Chappel Hill when he returns. Poor,
poor Dean. "Did dat nastey official pick on you even though you were in
violation of the rules? Sob. Sob. That's OK. We'll love you forever
even as you continue to choke up the big ones. Too bad we weren't
playing a lower seed. It's the NCAA committee's fault! They're such
bad guys. And the media. Grrrrrrrrrr."
- I guess Carolina needed more work on its man-to-man.
- How long will it be until ACChris adds "refs with quick fuses" to his
list of why UNC didn't win? I say Wednesday when he returns. Psssst,
Chris. Don't do it. Kansas whipped your team and good.
--dan'l
|
114.199 | Thanks for the Memories... | STA201::MCNIEL | | Sun Mar 31 1991 22:12 | 17 |
| See Comet notes (.194 - KU VS. DUKE prediction) ...I guess
I wasn't too out of bounds. Except for the "OT" comment. But,
what an ugly game! Leave Deano out of it and it still was an
ugly game. I hope the FINALS are more exciting.
Bottom line: Jamison is the heart and soul of the Jayhawks O & D
from a motivational aspect. He'll be a Senior next year...watch out!
Prediction:
Cinderalla versus Bud Grant?
....Cinderalla by 4 in double OT!
Jammin' J-hawk (aka Comet)
|
114.200 | | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | No problem | Sun Mar 31 1991 23:26 | 21 |
|
UNLV vs. Duke was definetely the best game of the tourney to date;
the final should be good also.
Duke did an excellent job of not allowing the ball to Larry
Johnson, which was one of the keys. The other was the disappearance
of Stacey Augmon. Lack of concentration, not paying attention to the clock
by letting the 45 second clock expire late in the game, and just looking
extremely nervous and tentative. Couldn't have happened at a worse
time as far as UNLV was concerned. Early foul trouble on Ackles just
about killed whatever defensive strategy Tark had for defending
Laettner. Once Anthony fouled out I knew that UNLV would basically
be holding on from that point on; they only scored 1 point afterwards.
Though they're not gonna win it all and get the accompanying
accolades of 'best ever', it was still a great run and not many
teams have the kind of year that they did, whatever consolation it
may be worth. Not only that, but they handled the defeat with class
and dignity, IMO.
glen j.
|
114.201 | | BUILD::MORGAN | | Mon Apr 01 1991 07:53 | 12 |
| WOW.
UNLV appeared to lose their composure as Dan'l stated with Augmon
screwing up, Johnson getting the "T", and Anthony fouling out. 'Twas a
helluva game though. I only hope tonight's is at the same emotional level.
What was the story with the UNC coach/players/refs/cops after the game?
I got the early edition paper and nothing was in there.
UNC's man to man is slooooowwwwwww.
Steve
|
114.202 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Mon Apr 01 1991 09:43 | 4 |
| STill, the highlight for me was watching old Dean-o take the gaspipe
again.....
'Saw
|
114.203 | More UNC gracious loosing | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Mon Apr 01 1991 10:38 | 16 |
| Reports are sketchy about the tunnel incident, but here is what has
been pieced together:
After the game, the UNC assistant coach (don't remember his name) was
shouting at Pavia, "That's bush! That's bush!" obviously referring to
the second technical.
An off duty policeman saw the coach approaching the officials and
quickly stepped between them and pushed the coach up against the wall.
The UNC players turned around and saw this incident and rushed to the
coach's defense and started into it with the officer (who I think was
in uniform) and other officials who had gathered.
All was dismissed and the NCAA is "investigating."
--dan'l
|
114.204 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Mon Apr 01 1991 10:44 | 9 |
| I will say that I was impressed with Dean Smith's sportsmanship however,
as he shook hands with all the players and coach on the way out.
The officiating has been very inconsistent from what I've seen.
I hope Duke wins, because I want to be able to say that the Huskies
lost to the National champs....8^)
'Saw
|
114.205 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Mon Apr 01 1991 10:56 | 11 |
| Explain something please. I've heard EVERYONE saying that UNLV was
playing "not to lose."
How can that be. They were two points down with 12 seconds left and
were going for a three pointer all the way. That's playing to win.
Johnson could have easily taken a layup and no one from Duke would have
risked the foul.
If anything, UNLV did not want OT. Is that playing "not to lose?"
--dan'l
|
114.206 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Dean validates Anti's claims again | Mon Apr 01 1991 13:12 | 22 |
|
> Johnson could have easily taken a layup and no one from Duke would have
> risked the foul.
I think they would have fouled him before they'd have just given it to him.
Afterall they were up 2, Johnson had just missed 2 out of 3 free throws.
Duke's defense did a good job by forcing Larry to bring up the ball and then
pinning him forcing him to pass. Hunt probably would have drove but was
easily doubled and had no room to drive. More than anything else I think he
was hoping for a rebound.
Duke played a great game and K outcoached Tark by a mile. The Larry Bird/
Doc Midnight defense wrinkle he threw in was a beauty. Also after Tark
went to the Amboea to get back in it, K pulls his offense out higher and
this opened up the baseline.
Tonight's matchup would favor Duke but I got to like the heart and deter-
mination that Kansas has shown. Plus the thought of how Smug the Dukies
would get has me pulling for Kansas. Also I expect Duke to be a bit flat
figuring that if they can beat UNLV they can beat anybody.
mike
|
114.207 | Kansas in a close one, 81-78! | POCUS::SALTALAMACCH | | Mon Apr 01 1991 14:35 | 10 |
| re: 204
I feel the same way.
If Duke wins, then I can say the Redmen lost to the National Champs.
However, my heart says Kansas.
Redmen Phil
|
114.208 | Should I TM Kzyzxyzxyzxy? | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Mon Apr 01 1991 14:37 | 27 |
| > I think they would have fouled him before they'd have just given it to him.
> Afterall they were up 2, Johnson had just missed 2 out of 3 free throws.
Good point, Mike. You are right. Coach Kzyxzyzxyzxy probably had that
figured too. Good thing I wasn't coaching.
Also, for those of you wondering why Johnson didn't shoot the three, if
you watch the replays, Laettner was right on him. The attempt might
have been blocked. Then suddenly Laettner was on the double team.
Yeah, no heart there.
I think Larry Johnson was also so surprised with the ease in which he
got downcourt that he didn't know exactly what to do when he got to the
line. I think Tark probably had some play to run and Johnson never
expected to be in the position he was in.
>Also I expect Duke to be a bit flat
> figuring that if they can beat UNLV they can beat anybody.
Did you see Kzyzxyzxyzxy right after the clock ticked down? He was
doing the 'calm down' thing with his hands. And apparantly the first
thing he said in the locker room was, "We're here to win the
championship, not beat UNLV." Duke will be focused on a goal that has
eluded them for several years. What a great ending to the Greg Koubek
story if they pull it off.
--dan'l
|
114.209 | Choke. | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | You shop at K-Mart!! | Mon Apr 01 1991 14:38 | 25 |
| Saw,
What you call Dean's sportmanship looked bush to me. Christ, I thought
he was the king who just got cxoronated. Shake hands with the coach,
walk off the court, and afterwards be gracious. Great message he sent
to his players, huh? "Yeah, witha miracle we can pull this out, but
instead, I'll geta myself kicked out, and then say congrats to all them
nice Kansas boys, while I lets my own team stare in shock..."
What to go Deano. Dean was out of the coaches box, on the floor lasted
week on numerous occassions against Temple. I guess Pavla didn't read
his "Rules For Dean" book before this game. In fact, the one thing
great about Pavla is that he doesn't let coaches walk all over him - he
lets them know he's in control. A refreshing change fromthe refs who
are afraid to blow the whislte against the elite coaches and favored
teams. Justice was served. The announcers handled the affair as
bushly as possible. I'm sick of the phrase "The officials getting
bigger than the game" WRONG! What about the coaches getting bigger
than the game. What about loud mouthed players getting bigger than the
game. That's the real story.
Dean substitutes too much. How he could let Fox stay in when it was
obvious he didn't have it is beyond me. Another excellent_loss.
JD
|
114.210 | packerisms | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Mon Apr 01 1991 15:19 | 15 |
| Now with UNLV out of the way, the big question is:
Who will Billy Packer root for?
My god was he pathetic Saturday night. Blatant slant toward the
Runnin' Rebels!
Hey, Bob Hunt, check out the P-Name! Did anyone else catch Packer say
"He's at the scorer's table for an extended blow." The room cracked up
when we heard that...and "dribble penetration." It was a very sexual
game, no?
--dan'l
|
114.211 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Mon Apr 01 1991 15:21 | 14 |
| > Hey, Bob Hunt, check out the P-Name! Did anyone else catch Packer say
> "He's at the scorer's table for an extended blow." The room cracked up
> when we heard that...and "dribble penetration." It was a very sexual
> game, no?
What did he mean by that? That he needed a rest or was shooting the poop
with the scorers?
Sometimes in practice (especially scrum practice) we'll say that we
need a blow and have someone switch in for it, but I've never heard
it otherwise.....
'Saw
|
114.212 | Head of the Scrum | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Mon Apr 01 1991 15:24 | 6 |
| >Sometimes in practice (especially scrum practice) we'll say that we
>need a blow
So that's why you ruggers always have dirty knees! 8-)
|
114.213 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Dean validates Anti's claims again | Mon Apr 01 1991 15:31 | 21 |
|
Saw and Phil, Georgetown kick the crap out of Duke but you still won't catch
me rooting for the DEBILS!!!!
not to mention the fact that JOJSHYATDD would be unberable with Hurley's
great stuff....
Dan-l, while K was trying to be cool and keep his players that way do you
really think he'll succeed? Maybe he will because they've been there before
so they know what it takes but Hurley sure looked and acted like he just
won a few kazillion dollars...
I just can't see them getting as sky high again....Kansas has faced more
adversity along the way and has adapted. Has Duke ever been trailing by
double digits yet?
Oh yeah Josh before you get too high Hurley had 8 points 4 assists at 3 turn-
overs at one point. The difference this year was clearly the Hills and Davis
vs. having Brickey and Henderson......
mike
|
114.215 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Mon Apr 01 1991 16:20 | 11 |
| I've looked around quite a bit, and not being a basketball fanatic
have not been able to find it.
What was the historic thing that UNLV was about to do, but Duke
prevented?
I mean, it couldn't have been winning two champeenships in a row.
Was it like the number of games won in a row or something?
Deen to wonk,
'Wsa
|
114.216 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Apr 01 1991 16:32 | 7 |
| They were nowhere close to consecutive wins and going through an
unbeaten season and winning consecutive titles have both been done
before. What's historic is that a unbeaten season with a title hasn't
happened since Indiana in 1975-76, and consecutive titles hasn't
happened since UCLA won 7 in a row from 67-73.
John
|
114.217 | Dean, an unfortunate, classy exit | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:00 | 7 |
| >I fail to see what was so classless about Dean's exit.
That's 'cause your eyes are open and your busy thinking for yourself.
Get with the program, will you? We've got to conform to the vocal
majority, no matter how self-serving it may seem.
Dan
|
114.218 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Yo Sugar Ray, you sweating alot! | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:17 | 26 |
| Hawk,
Cuz, I saw as another case where the Coach (or 'legend' in this case)
once again tries to be bigger than the game itself. Tries to detract
from a great victory by Kansas by making it the game that Dean was
kicked out. It was a great way of trying to save face. Instead of the
aweful media types and fans taking it out on ol Dean for pulling one of
the most bonehaid coaching jobs in the history of the NC2A, instead
they'll remember how ol' Dean was justa so classy on the way out. He
was covering his ass. And his assistant coach and players showed their
class after the game. Of course Dan will never comment on that. In
his eyes, Dean wasn't kicked out - the assistants didn't act like asses
- and Rick Fox wasn't cold - nope, in Dan's eyes, it was the anti-Deans
who forced all this upon Deano.
Dan, you're starting to sound like ACC Chris, Jesse Helms and George
Bush - instead of using the media as a scapegoat, you are using the
folks who don't idolize Deano as the scapegoats. Hrumph.
Dean blew it Dan. I didn't, Dan'l didn't, Mike Childs didn't, Bob Hunt
didn't, MrT didn't. No Dan, Dean blew it again. He's proven he can't
win the big one again Dan. He's proven he caint change strategy on the
fly to produce the big win. He's proven he can't take adversity. ANd
he's proven he can't admit when he's wrong.
JD
|
114.219 | | DECWET::METZGER | Oh No, I've said too much... | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:18 | 9 |
|
I personnaly thought Dean was grandstanding when he made his exit. The point
would have been served by just shaking the coaches hand and exiting the arena.
Not an excellent loss by itself but it adds fire to the underachiever theory.
3 more years for the greatest recruiting class ever to win a champeenship...
Metz
|
114.220 | You said your piece, JD. Put the teething ring back in | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:19 | 1 |
|
|
114.221 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Yo Sugar Ray, you sweating alot! | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:22 | 8 |
| Dan,
Resorting to personal attacks? I thought you disdained them. Or is it
another one of your double-standards.
Dean choked again, Dano.
|
114.223 | RE: teething ring | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:31 | 6 |
| Eeeeeeeew. Gee, Dan. Take that back or you might make JD cry...go
ahead, explain what crying is to him. You do it so well.
;-)
--dan'l
|
114.224 | Call 'em like I see 'em. | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:33 | 19 |
| >Dean blew it again. He's proven he can't win the big one again Dan.
No, he's proven the opposite. See 1982 for details.
>He's proven he caint change strategy on the fly to produce the big win.
No, he's proven the opposite. He also threw a lot of changes of
strategy into Saturday's game, which worked well. His team didn't win.
>He's proven he can't take adversity.
No, he's proven the opposite. He handled the adversity extremely well.
JD, you've proven your criticism's of Dean are not to be taken
seriously.
Dan
|
114.225 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | The 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLV | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:41 | 9 |
|
re .206
> Duke played a great game and K outcoached Tark by a mile. The Larry Bird/
> Doc Midnight defense wrinkle he threw in was a beauty. Also after Tark
Mike, would you mind explaining this one ?
Oh yeah, I think Kansas will win this one tonight ....
|
114.226 | I accept the responsiblity | MAXWEL::CHILDS | UNC looses and it's all my fault | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:46 | 8 |
|
Dan, answer me this with a 9 point lead in the first half with Montross
dominating both ends of the court Dean substituted for him, WHY? The game
had been close till he entered and made his presences felt. KU quickly got
back into it with him on the bench. Even his beloved worshipper Billy
"ACC" Packer was beggin him to take a timeout....
mike
|
114.227 | in your case the sport is football | MAXWEL::CHILDS | UNC looses and it's all my fault | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:49 | 6 |
|
Doc, that's where 4 guys play man to man and one guy plays zone...
:^) <-- many of these
mike
|
114.228 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Yo Sugar Ray, you sweating alot! | Mon Apr 01 1991 18:05 | 24 |
| Dan,
Oh I get it now. Dean wins once in 31 years, and that proves he can
win the big one. Dan, if you watched the game you would have seen that
Dean didn't substitute well, that he didn't adjust his offense, that he
went too late to defensive substitutions, that he didn't take advantage
of the advantages he had. Dan, those are facks, those aren't make
believe. He failed to use his strategic numbers (i.e. bench depth) to
get KU into foul trouble (except Jamison).
Dan, Dean coached very, very poorly in this game. And unfortunately
Dan, its a habit he's been into for quite a while now - coaching poorly
in big games. If this was something that happened every so often, then
Dean might escape teh criticism he's getting - but he does it every
year except one.
But Dan, perhaps you are right. Perhaps Dean should be praised for
getting chucked out ot the biggest game of the year - and he should be
praised for losing once again.
And Dan, if Coach K.'s team don't do it, then he's another Dean in
training.
JD
|
114.229 | At least it's a relavant point. Thanks, Mike. | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Mon Apr 01 1991 18:32 | 17 |
| >Dan, answer me this with a 9 point lead in the first half with Montross
>dominating both ends of the court Dean substituted for him, WHY?
Well, I agree with the criticism. I think he subbed too much in
general this season which at times prevented continuity for his team.
But I think he had a purpose in his decisions, which was to keep fresh
legs on the floor and tire out the opposition with numbers. It worked
to a great degree.
I wouldn't say that Montross was dominating both ends. He has
developed nicely (some credit is due Dean) and was contributing as he
should. Also, Montross isn't yet a great low post option on the
offense; Chilcutt is/was superior all year, given his nice turnaround,
where as Montross moves with back to the basket aren't ready for the
big time.
Dan
|
114.230 | JD, your analysis is of the bimbo variety | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Mon Apr 01 1991 18:45 | 47 |
| JD's "points"
>Dean didn't substitute well
Not every substitution worked out perfectly, which is the case with
every coach in every game. He worked the strategy that he chose for
the team this year, and it was one of the four most successful
strategies of the year out of the 230 or so NCAA div 1 teams.
>that he didn't adjust his offense
But he did adjust his offense. Immensely. Why do you make up such
statements like the one above? A few minutes into the second half, did
he or did he not adjust his offense and start to have Fox, Davis and
Lynch begin taking thier man off the dribble, something I hadn't seen
all year long? He implemented a starkly different offense just for
this game, considering he was coaching against WIlliams who knew every
play there was previously.
>that he went too late to defensive substitutions
You're not showing much ability to objectively say what he was and
wasn't doing. When do you think he went to defensive subs, and when do
you think he should have?
>Dan, those are facks, those aren't make believe.
They are what is known as jaded opinions. And most of 'em are dead
wrong.
>Dean coached very, very poorly in this game.
It was a well coached game on both sides. As anyone can plainly see,
the difference was that UNC's three seniors who they've come to rely on
all had poor offensive games and were guilty of bad decisions. That's
a lot to overcome for any coach. Given that fact, a reasonable fan
might expect a blowout. Good coaching kept Carolina in the game.
>if Coach K.'s team don't do it, then he's another Dean in
>training.
I don't like Coach K at all; I don't like Duke much better. And I
think they should win this year, and they should have beaten Louisville
in '86. I won't condemn him if he doesn't win, and I doubt any posse
will form to lynch him every time his team loses in the future.
Dan
|
114.231 | Here, Pete, bend down and take a breath | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Mon Apr 01 1991 18:48 | 14 |
| Yet Montross shot 3-for-4 in the limited "system" time he saw and Chilcutt
was ice-freakin'-cold all day long. But the legend loves his seniors
soooooo systematically much that they dragged him down to yet another
systematically excellent defeat. Fox, Rice, and Chilcutt shot an
unbelievably bad 8-for-36 and the poor Heels went home.
I think the Carolina underclassmen ought to give the seniors a swirlie
now. Especially Montross. He ought to be holding Chilcutt's head under
water until Pete's ears turn the same shade of blue on Duke's uniforms.
For the record, I have no problem with Snuff shaking hands with whomever
he wanted to for however long it took. The longer he was on my TV screen
snuffering (tm) like that the more my thighs were shuddering.
Bob Hunt
|
114.232 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Yo Sugar Ray, you sweating alot! | Mon Apr 01 1991 19:12 | 14 |
| Dan,
Thanks for the belly laugh. You calling someone elses' opinion jaded
has to be the classic line of the decade, if not the century. Too
funny.
Dan, I think Deano stuck with his seniors way too long, and relied on
them way too much - especially after it was *painfully* obvious that
they weren't producing. It was *obvious* that the team wasn't getting
into a rythem, and it was *obvious* that the frequent substitutions
weren't helping. A good coach adjusts. Dean stuck to his guns. Dean
lost yet again in the big one.
JD
|
114.233 | Duke up 5 | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | The lady is 2 tough 2 tame! | Mon Apr 01 1991 23:09 | 4 |
|
Duke by 5 at the half...
B.A.
|
114.234 | | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Bert Campanaris? | Tue Apr 02 1991 02:30 | 1 |
| Duke wins by 7...
|
114.235 | Duke; odds were 10-1 before tourney began | KAOA01::JTURNER | Ottawa Senators 92-93 | Tue Apr 02 1991 08:18 | 34 |
|
Good game.
Especially if you are a Duke fan. Hats off once again to
Duke who proved that they are the number one team in the NCAA!
Kansas made it a good, exciting game, but I don't think there
was ever any doubt from the opening tip-off on who would come
out on top. Kansas was lacking in the outside shooting game,
and Duke played them tough.
Looks like the ACC has another winner in Duke and they have
plenty of players back next year. Hurley played great, hardly
any turnovers and he controlled the tempo. I also thought Grant
Hill played well as well as Christian Lattener was red hot from the
foul line.
I really like to see a group of kids win who work hard together,
and really seem to enjoy playing together.
It was also nice to see coach "K" finally get the big one, and also
great to see the Tark not in the final game.
Congratulations to Duke for winning and to Kansas for having a
great tourney and providing a good championship game.
Jim
|
114.236 | I could have sworn it was Billy Owens | CHIEFF::CHILDS | UNC looses and it's all my fault | Tue Apr 02 1991 10:04 | 13 |
|
Good game. Kansas played tough but you could just sense it early that Duke
wasn't to be denied. While Laettner deserved the MVP for the tourney, I
think an MVP-1A has to go the Grant Hill, especially last night. On saturday
not only did he fustrate Augmon, he help Hurley out with the pressure and
Christy on the boards. Last night again it seemed like every time DUKE got
tired he got the big play to get their juices flowing. Great performance by
a freshman.
Is it just me or is Christy the most protected player in the game?
mike
|
114.237 | | 7221::JRODOPOULOS | Hey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ? | Tue Apr 02 1991 10:06 | 5 |
| Duke finally won the big one. I am so happy that nothing is going to ruin
my day. What is particularly pleasing is that Coach K has just as many
NCAA titles as Dean Smith.
John "D Cowboys/Blue Devils" R.
|
114.238 | Thoughts: | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Tue Apr 02 1991 10:25 | 30 |
| One of the best moments last night came after the game during the
celebration and subsequent mugging for the camera. Brian Davis was
leading them all in some stupid, planned hoohaa for the camera and
Kzyxzyxzyxzy(tm) said "Brian, cool it" and did that calm down thing
with his hands again.
I was in a similar circumstance during my swimming days and my coach
stopped me from celebrating. I really appreciate that now because
looking back, I bet I really looked foolish in my celebration. Duke
will be remembered as a classy champion.
And how about that first ally-oop. Man, can Hill sky or what? And
he's only a baby!
> Is it just me or is Christy the most protected player in the game?
Mike, I think it's just you. Laettner did as much as was done against
him.
I hope Dean was watching so he can learn how to coach the big one.
Kzyxzyxzyxzy(tm)'s subbing for Laettner to coincide with the TV time
out was perfect. Billy Packer is a boob.
On the other side, Roy Williams made that massive substitution a-la
Deano toward the end so he could talk to his main men...and then left
them sitting on the bench for two possessions! They managed to turn
the ball over and give Duke an even greater lead. I couldn't
understand that.
--dan'l
|
114.239 | Dopey Vitale | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Jimmy, you should have smacked him | Tue Apr 02 1991 10:26 | 20 |
|
On the TV front I was very disappointed with CBS' non-use of the instant
replay. It was like they decided they wouldn't question any calls made.
Also good defensive or offensive strategies got overlooked because of it.
I thought the quick reaction of Dule to 1-3-1 trap when KU first threw it
at them deserve a replay. Th eonly one I remember is Hill's play...
The ESPN show was pretty good except for Vitale. I wish Jimmy had slugged
him. I felt my buddy Billy Raferty got off a great shot at Vitale...
Seems Vitale was waxing on and on about how this coach and that coach asked
him for advice so when Billy got his shot to speak, He starts off with
"well when Jimmy and So-so cam to me for advice on during their championship
run....the whole place busted up and then he just asked Vitale what he was
doing there if all these people seek his advice??
hahahaaa
mike
|
114.241 | More... | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Tue Apr 02 1991 11:00 | 17 |
| Duke just wins the biggest game in their history, there is hysteria on
the court, the band is playing, cheerleaders are jumping around, Kansas
fans are taking a deep breath and hold back the tears, the Duke players
are running around hugging each other and...
"Hi, I'm Greg Norman and I wear Reebok Pump Golf shoes."
CBS sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And it's time to put that 'One Shining Moment Song' to rest! I
remember them playing that after the Indiana win in '87.
--dan'l
|
114.242 | Packer - diarrhea of the mouth | LEAF::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is walking!! | Tue Apr 02 1991 11:06 | 11 |
| That "Duke is tired" thing got on my nerves too. In fact it made me so
tired, I barely stayed awake! Packer was a total boob. He and Vitale
should get together and do a show. I think Packer was so pumped that
he couldn't shut up. I also agree that the Gulf War link was a little
weak, but I did enjoy the video they put together with it, to the tune
of John Cougar Mellencamp's "Small Town".
Hawk - in a few years you'll have to have your daughter teachy mine the
art of hoop watching. I certainly could use the partner.
=Bob=
|
114.243 | Good to see the liberals win one! | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Tue Apr 02 1991 11:31 | 10 |
| I was impressed with Brian Davis spending his summers in DC working for
Senator Terry Sanford (D-NC). Gee, I wonder what the UNLV players are
doing this summer? As one of my friends put it when Duke upset the
Rebs, "Does this mean they have to go back to jail now?"
And I'm surpised George Bush let Nantz say that about Davis. Afterall,
Sanford voted against the war and lord knows we should be glorifying
all the death and destruction we caused.
--dan'l
|
114.244 | See you next year | STA201::MCNIEL | | Tue Apr 02 1991 11:33 | 15 |
| Congrats Dukies!
All season somebody has stepped up for the Jayhawks. Last night
they kinda just moved the ball around a bit...really weird considering
how they really took it to Indiana and Arkansas. They played flat
in the UNC game too!
Anyway, the Dukies beat the Hawks at every turn...and clearly deserve
the Championship.
Congrats Coach K and Co.,
Kansas Comet
|
114.245 | | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Tue Apr 02 1991 14:01 | 16 |
| >While Laettner deserved the MVP for the tourney, I
>think an MVP-1A has to go the Grant Hill, especially last night. On saturday
>not only did he fustrate Augmon, he help Hurley out with the pressure and
>Christy on the boards.
Agreed. Hill was the difference from last year's team. He has the
athleticism that the team needs, but now there's a few other players as
well...the other Hill, and the frosh off the bench, Davis.
>Is it just me or is Christy the most protected player in the game?
No doubt. Reminds me of watching Larry in that respect. He's gotta
hack for a whistle, but goes to the line after a touch or even an "in
the area".
Dan
|
114.246 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Yo Sugar Ray, you sweating alot! | Wed Apr 03 1991 12:33 | 18 |
| Congrats to Duke.
Mike, Agree on Laettner. He's got the scream down pat. Early in the
first half he got a couple of late whistles his way with the scream
I've been hacked routine. Huge disparity in free throws - Duke's way
of course. Been that way throughout the tourney.
I still fail to see what is so great about Hurley.
Packer was horrible, as usual. I agre about the Duke is tired crap.
What, Kansas' game ended 4 hours before there's. Big deal. Lame,
Billy, Lame.
McCafferty can shoot, and whine with the best.
Decent game. Better than lasted year.
JD
|
114.247 | | LVIRA::WASKOM | | Wed Apr 03 1991 14:17 | 12 |
| I too got really tired of the "Duke is tired" nonsense from the announcer.
What surprised me was the implication I caught that both teams had gone
back to campus between the two games. That doesn't strike me as a
particularly brilliant idea, if true. Does anyone know for sure?
I watched all three games of the Final Four. Best of the lot was the
Duke - UNLV game. I actually *watched* (rather than listen for announcer
hysteria as a clue to look up from doing needlepoint) about half of that
game. Actual watch ratio for the final game was about 5%. Sez something
about the relative interest level of the two games......
A&W
|
114.248 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | The 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLV | Wed Apr 03 1991 15:09 | 11 |
| Not only is Laettner protected, but you can just see how the media's
thighs started shuddering when Hurley played a couple of good games in
a row. "Hurley dominated ... Hurley this .... Hurley that ...."
Hell, lasted year Hurley didn't have Grant Hill to take the pressure
off of him. That's worth at least 5 points game to Duke right there.
Anyhow, congrats to the Blu Debbils (tm), they played a solid game. I
think Kansas would have fared better if they could have gotten a
couple of key shots in close to drop, but it wasn't meant to be for
them.
|
114.249 | Laettner hacked no more no less than other forwards | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Wed Apr 03 1991 15:18 | 20 |
| I'm not violently pro- or anti-Christian Laettner but I can recall at
least two instances in the tournament where Laettner was indeed roughed up
as opposed to this theory that he gets nice fouls called against his man
if the guy so much as breathes on him ...
First was during the Connecticut game, of course, where the UConn Huskie,
Burell, I think, was giving Laettner a couple of deluxe elbow noogies
while Laettner was underneath him. Refs never called that one but CBS
picked it up and showed it over and over again. Blatant roughstuff.
Second was during the Vegas game when he got loose underneath the side of
the basket in the first half. The Vegas guy behind him, Ackles, I think,
jumped up and gave him a full-windup hard machete-style swipe to the arms
as Laettner went up. The ball dropped and Laettner went to the line for
a 3-point play. CBS showed that one a few times, too. Clear foul.
Laettner does go the line a lot but I'd have a hard time believing he's
some kind of special case. He gets hacked as much as the next guy.
Bob Hunt
|
114.250 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Wed Apr 03 1991 15:28 | 7 |
| > First was during the Connecticut game, of course, where the UConn Huskie,
> Burell, I think, was giving Laettner a couple of deluxe elbow noogies
> while Laettner was underneath him. Refs never called that one but CBS
> picked it up and showed it over and over again. Blatant roughstuff.
Think it was Sellers....
|
114.251 | More... | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Wed Apr 03 1991 15:34 | 9 |
| And don't forget the time in the championship game when Randall all but
pushed Laettner into the cheerleaders and there was no whistle.
Don't put down Laettner just because you guys are watching the game
from other than an objective standpoint.
I'm with Bob Hunt. Laettner gives and takes what he deserves.
--dan'l
|
114.252 | wrong interpatation | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I'm doin' fine-e-e-e-e on cloud 9 | Wed Apr 03 1991 15:45 | 9 |
|
Bob and Dan, I'm not denying that Laettner doesn't get hammered and give
and take, what I'm refering to is offensively more than once I saw him
plow into somebody no call, pushing on rebounds no call and maybe a missed
hack or two. I'd also still like to know who fouled him with 12.7 seconds
left in the Vegas game? Looked to me like there was one of his own players
between him and the Vegas guy...
mike
|
114.253 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | CoachK,JT,Dean,JimmyV,Tark... | Wed Apr 03 1991 16:30 | 13 |
| Bob and Dan'l
Duke has a history of not getting called for fouls. A bump by Hurley
or Laetner is good defense, a bump by the opponent is a foul. Duke
went to the line 27 times, kansas 8. Laetner went 12 times. 1 and half
more foul shots than the *entire* Kansas basketball team.
I think Laetner is a hell of a player - who excels in big games. I
also think Duke is one of those teams that gets the benefit of the
calls. Which is a tribute to Coach K - who doesn't do a lot of offical
baiting.
JD
|
114.254 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Apr 03 1991 16:30 | 34 |
|
re: Tired
18-21 year old "kids" do not get "tired" with ONLY 1 1/2 nights
sleep.. Now, 35 year old refs (like me) that work 200 games are
tired. I thought it was kinda funny how these young kids can become
so tired. Geez, they're there for the National Championship which you
would think would not make anyone tired, but somehow, they "were
tired". Seems that they should get into better shape.
How about the women's side of the NCAA's? They had to play the
semi's on Saturday and then play the finals on Sunday, but I never
heard the announcers comment on how tired they were.
re: MVP
Laettner had a good 2 days, but in the final, most of his points
came from the foul line. At one point, he had 12 points and only one
field goal. I wouldn't really say that was MVP material.
To be honest, Hurley was the MVP to me. Of course I'm partial to
point guards, but after all the stuff I heard in hear about how he
sucks wind, I thought he played incredibly well at the point. His
defense wasn't the greatest in the UNLV game, but he made some key
hoops plus some key passes down the stretch not to mention that he
didn't come out of either game.
I think he has improved greatly over last year and even from
earlier this year. Without him at the point, I doubt Duke would of
been within 10 of UNLV let alone winning the whole tourney.
bill..g.
|
114.255 | Cool in the clutch...he gets my MVP vote | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Wed Apr 03 1991 16:44 | 13 |
| >At one point, he had 12 points and only one
> field goal. I wouldn't really say that was MVP material.
Hitting all those free throws, 12 in a row at one point I think, in the
championship game is enough for me. But he was MVP of the FF, not the
championship game. Laettner's performance against the gang from the
Las Vegas Correctional Institute's work release program was also
factored in.
And if not, who?
--dan'l
|
114.256 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Wed Apr 03 1991 17:46 | 12 |
| Anybody watch the Women's Final Four?
Some pretty good hoops.
I was rooting for UConn, because I thought that Debbie Baer was a Stone
Fox! (It's as good a reason as any).
I was originally thinking that the 6'5" twins for the Hoos might be
exciting - Heather and Heidi Burge. However they need some serious
Cosmetic Intervention. (They still should have beaten Tennessee).
Mike JN
|
114.257 | Lady Hoos oh-so-close | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Wed Apr 03 1991 18:39 | 19 |
| Yeah, I suffered through the Hoos' loss to Tennessee on Sunday. They had
a great year but it was an underachievement since they had been top-ranked
almost all year long.
I attribute the overall experience of Pat Summit and her Tennessee program
for the win. I don't think the Lady Vols were better than the Hoo-ettes
but the program had been to numerous Final Fours and had won two titles
before. When it came down to crunch time, they knew how to win it. It
was all new to the Hoos.
I hope the Lady Hoos learn from it and come back even stronger nexted
year. They have everyone back but Cardoza. The Burge twins need to hit
the weights over the summer. They have the height but not the strength.
I got tired of seeing the stronger Lady Vols slapping the ball outta their
hands. But they're young still.
Shoulda had it this year.
Bob Hunt
|
114.258 | | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Bert Campanaris? | Wed Apr 03 1991 18:42 | 9 |
| Agreed on the Doublemint Twins. Which one was Baer?
Most of them definitely looked like they were female brutes. Not
sure I'd want to meet Dawn Staley in a back alley. Kelly Casteel
looked like she was from the back hills somewhere. Good games...
I guess I rooted for UVa since they hadn't won it before. My
folks got a kick out their coach dressed up in a dress looking
lady-like scream insults at the refs, then appearing to put on
lipstick as they went to a timeout...
|
114.259 | | DECWET::METZGER | That's me in the spot.....light.... | Wed Apr 03 1991 19:15 | 15 |
|
How come the wimmin look so awful shooting the ball?
To me One example of poetry in motion is watching a pure shooter like
Pistol Pete or Glenn Rice (the year mich won the title) take the ball off of a
screen and shoot a perfect jumper from 3 pt land and hit nothing but net.....
Whenever I watch the women play hoops they manage to make every jump shot look
ugly. It is because they don't get the full extension of the men ? is it some
other reason ? is it the camera angles tv uses ?
Inquiring minds dean to wonk,
Metz
|
114.260 | Balance, execution, follow-thru...swish | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Wed Apr 03 1991 19:22 | 9 |
| >To me One example of poetry in motion is watching a pure shooter like
>Pistol Pete or Glenn Rice (the year mich won the title) take the ball off of a
>screen and shoot a perfect jumper from 3 pt land and hit nothing but net.....
Anderson Hunt has the prettiest form on the J of anyone I saw in the
tourney this year. You have to love those rainbows that hit the bottom
of the net. Reminds me of ... me!
Dan
|
114.261 | More ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Wed Apr 03 1991 22:30 | 14 |
| Agreed, my bro' Anderson does indeed have a nice sweet shot. Billy
McCaffrey and Mark Macon have nice shots as well.
I didn't necessarily think that the women's shots looked bad. They
certainly swished just like men's shots. I saw a couple of the players,
Tammi Reiss in particular, who looked like they had to get kinda
"underneath" the ball to sorta "launch" it a bit but they still had good
spin on the ball as it went through the air and snipped the net.
The big difference that I saw between the men and women was the turnovers.
A lot more dribbling and passing errors among the women. And, of course,
many more blocked shots in the men's game.
Bob Hunt
|
114.262 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Thu Apr 04 1991 08:59 | 25 |
| >I was rooting for UConn, because I thought that Debbie Baer was a Stone
>Fox! (It's as good a reason as any).
The most interesting thing about watching the Huskies was that I
saw them quite a few times after rugby practice. We've got quite
a few guys who are alumni (a big UCONN rugby influence on the Wanderers).
Anyway, this one guy Matt knows most of these girls. It was great
watching them, and then getting the low-down on them at the same time.
I'm pleased with the Huskie women, because of their accomplishments and
it was nice that they weren't overshadowed by the men.
The night after Duke won, our local sports was showing the reaction
in Duke's home arena. The sportscaster said "That's the way it'll be
at UCONN when the men finally win one....unless the women beat them
to it".
Not a bad year, all in all for UCONN. We've got a way to go, and
some work to do, but it'll happen.....
'Saw
|
114.263 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | The 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLV | Thu Apr 04 1991 12:15 | 9 |
| Women will execute and play the team game more than men, IMO. I find it
a more enjoyable game to watch sometimes - cleaner and less cluttered.
Remember of course, I was at Rice whenthe program was near bottom, and
the women were pretty good. Not to mention I got to watch Texas and
Arkansas' women's teams roll into town (and over Rice :-) every year
...
Doc
|
114.264 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Apr 04 1991 12:16 | 10 |
| � Anderson Hunt has the prettiest form on the J of anyone I saw in the
� tourney this year. You have to love those rainbows that hit the bottom
� of the net. Reminds me of ... me!
� Dan
The only time you hit the bottom of the net is when your airball
grazes it on the way down!
/Don
|
114.265 | imo | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Then Came Bronson | Thu Apr 04 1991 12:29 | 8 |
| Women's Final Four:
It was between watching this and clipping my toenails. I went for the
toe nails - more action, more exciting.
Women's basketball is like watching paint dry.
JD
|
114.266 | | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Thu Apr 04 1991 12:58 | 9 |
|
I beg to differ JD. I was up late lasted year watching
ESPN when they were showing a womens game between Stanford
and Washington. That was the best *basketball* game I
saw all year. Of course, Stanford had Jennifer Azi (sp?)
who was the MVP of the galaxy. She had a very pretty J and
could dribble like Marcus Haynes used to for the Globetrotters.
Claybroon
|
114.267 | Two 6-5 ladies - and me!!! | WORDY::NAZZARO | UMass: NIT Final Four now; NCAA next | Thu Apr 04 1991 13:10 | 3 |
| I, for one, wouldn't mind being the filling in a Burge sandwich.
NAZZ
|
114.268 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Apr 04 1991 13:23 | 25 |
|
John Wooden made a comment last weekend that I thought was really
true and I believe it can be attributed to the women's game.
He basically said that the teams of today have better individual
talent, but lack good team play. In his opinion, when the individual
talent increases, it decreases team play (I guess all we need to do is
look at the NBA as an example). This is due to the fact that as
individuals get better, the coach can let this person do more, hence
the overall teamplay decreases.
Now, I think this very evident in the women's game. There are few
players that possess great individual talent as in the men's game.
Sure there are some women who are head and shoulders above the rest,
but for the most part, the majority of the women are all basically the
same in individual talent. I believe that because the women are so
close in talent, that this in turn promotes more team play. Hey just
my opinion but I think the women play a better team game than the men.
That's not saying that it is better basketball (eye of the beholder)
it just means that they play a better team game IMO.
bill..g.
|
114.269 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Apr 04 1991 14:31 | 3 |
| Doc (or anyone), how far did the Lady Longhorns go in the tournament
this year? They always buzzsaw through the SEC and the regular season,
but stumble in the tournament.
|
114.270 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Apr 04 1991 14:51 | 3 |
| Lady Longhorns lost in either the first or second round to Lamar.
John
|
114.271 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Luv, his head's up his ugly rear | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:01 | 13 |
|
> I, for one, wouldn't mind being the filling in a Burge sandwich.
Nah, you ain't worthy.
BTW, does the term "Longhorn" refer to both female and male of the
species? Like, do female longhorns have, in fact, long horns? Are
there any college teams with male names, like the Bucks f'rinstance,
that have the Does as their wimmens team? What does Drake U. call its
team, the Drakes and the [name for a female duck]?
Dickstah, asking with wide-eyed wonderment
|
114.272 | How about the Centenary Gentlewomen (or is it Lady Gents?) | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:10 | 1 |
|
|
114.273 | | CAM::WAY | HWRFC Clydescale | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:10 | 14 |
| Dickstah...
It defies the laws of Nature.
They always append "Lady" to the name of the team. For example,
the Lady Huskies. You couldn't call them the UCONN Bitches. That
wouldn't be nice.
So, they just make it easy and append lady to the front of the men's
name....
hth,
'Saw
|
114.274 | QUACK! | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:22 | 10 |
|
Dickstah,
I'm surprised you don't know the name for a *female duck*!
I thought you wuz a hunter-type-o-individual? The correct
term is hen. We also refer to them as Suzy's - as in "Don't
shoot any Suzy's". Sorry about the punctuation there Ninja.
I don't know how to pluralize Suzy!
Claybron
|
114.275 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Herald mundane quote fodder | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:25 | 5 |
| Claybroon, in the interest of equal rights and all that, I'm not averse
to blastin' hens as well as drakes. We gotsta maintain our affirmative
action quotas, ya know.
Mark.
|
114.276 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Luv, his head's up his ugly rear | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:32 | 3 |
|
Shoot 'em first, sort 'em out later.
|
114.277 | Bitchin', fer sure | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:37 | 3 |
| I always get a chuckle when they talk about the "Lady Dawgs" from Georgia.
Bob Hunt
|
114.278 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:37 | 6 |
| When pluralizing a word that ends in"Y", change the y to ie and then
add s. The plural of Suzy is Suzies. Suzy's indicates that something
belongs to Suzy. Suzies' means that something belongs to more than one
Suzy.
the 'Police
|
114.279 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | at scorer's table for extended blow | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:40 | 6 |
| ...except when there is a vowel before the 'Y' and then you just add
the 'S'.
Shlop shlip shits.
--dan'l
|
114.280 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | The 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLV | Thu Apr 04 1991 16:19 | 15 |
| re .268
Well said Goose ... you did a better job of it than I did. JD, I
strongly advise you to watch a couple of decent women's teams in
person, and you may change your mind. I had simular opinions, then I
decided (God knows why) to watch the Lady Owls play UH I believe.
It didn't take long for me to become a women's basketball fan after
that. You see better ball-handling and passing among women than you may
ever see among some men's teams. The biggest problem I see right now,
is the still large (but not as huge as 10 years ago) gap between the
good and bad programs. A good team (UT, Lousiana Tech, Tenn.) is really
good, while the bad ones really sip ....
Doc
|
114.281 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Then Came Bronson | Thu Apr 04 1991 17:12 | 6 |
| Doc,
I've gone to women's games, I've watched them on TV. I like fast paced
hoops. Women's hoops is anything but fast paced.
JD
|
114.282 | | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Thu Apr 04 1991 17:50 | 10 |
|
Wail, outchere they don't want us shooting Mallard hens. If'n
you do, you're done hunting for the day (100 pt limit; mallard
hen = 100 pts).
Ninja, you are indeed an apostrophreak! Thanks for the help.
Sorry for cluttering up this topic.........
Claybroon
|
114.283 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Apr 04 1991 21:22 | 12 |
| Dan'l, I'd forgotten about the exception to the rule you mentioned.
The plural of way is ways not waies.
Claywad, I'm not an apostrophreak. I had these rules drummed into me
through 12 years of English Grammar and I've remembered them.
Apostrophes are never used on verbs that end in "S". The only place
they're borderline acceptable on plurals is when an abbreviation or
number is being pluralized. They're used in contractions and to
indicate possession.
John
|
114.284 | | CAM::WAY | HWRFC Clydesdale | Fri Apr 05 1991 09:48 | 32 |
| > Dan'l, I'd forgotten about the exception to the rule you mentioned.
> The plural of way is ways not waies.
I'd be willing to bet though that this is a fairly recent rule, because
waies looks a bit like Old English, or maybe Middle English.
One of the most interesting things I've seen is the PBS series on
the History of the English Language. English is one of the most
massive languages on Earth. The wealth of expression possible in
English in not equaled in many, many others.
If you ever get a chance to see this series, check it out. If you've
ever wondered why people in the South talk like they do, or folks
from New England talk like Pahk ya cah in Hahvahd yahd, you'll find out.
> Claywad, I'm not an apostrophreak. I had these rules drummed into me
> through 12 years of English Grammar and I've remembered them.
A style guide can be purchased in any bookstore, with all of these
rules. Mine is second hand, called "The Little, Brown Handbook".
It's invaluable when I write the odd short story or humoristic piece....
If you've ever had to submit a piece of writing in a professional
arena (i.e. for me things like specs, proposals etc) they are judged,
even subconsciously, by the folks to whom you submit them. Poor spelling
and grammar can have an adverse effect, because that first impression
can make all the difference....
'Saw
|
114.285 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | WonFarfugIsKnotEnuf! WhoIsTooBlam?! | Fri Apr 05 1991 17:16 | 16 |
| Re: Womens Hoop's (heh heh... couldnt resis't)
A lot depends on the quality of the teams. I saw the Lady Buffs (The CU
Buffalo counterparts) earlier this year, and it was painful. Poor
passing, poor shooting, everything about the game was awful. Ordinarily
I'm honest enough to admit that a woman College athlete, or a woman
professional athlete, could probably clean my clock. Golf, tennis,
whatever.... But most women hoopsters, I'd be willing to go one on one
( in BASKETBALL ) and by the time we were through they would envy the
dead!
However, the Women's NCAA Final Four showed some good hoops. Fun to
watch. Easily as good, in terms of enjoyment, as many of the men's
teams I've seen this year.
Mike JN
|