T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
111.1 | Lots of maybes | SHALOT::HUNT | Same Old World Order | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:38 | 11 |
| Fran Tarkenton and Earl Campbell are in and don't have championship rings.
How about Archie Manning, Ken Anderson, John Hadl, and Jim Hart ??? Are
they in ??? John Brodie, Billy Kilmer ???
How about George Blanda ??? Did he ever play on a championship team ???
Also, Sonny Jurgensen may have been on the 1960 Eagles title team but he
certainly was not the top gun. Norm Van Brocklin ran that team.
Bob Hunt
|
111.2 | O.J. Simpson, John Hannah | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:51 | 1 |
|
|
111.3 | | CAM::WAY | When Nick returns: Mother of all Parties | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:57 | 3 |
| merlin olsen, deacon jones
|
111.4 | Yaz, Rocket but certainly none of the Celtics | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I was testing the bounds of reality | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:06 | 8 |
|
I think old George was still around in 76 when the Raiders won their first.
Also didn't he win the old AFL title when he was with the Oilers as the
QB with Charlie Toller and Billy Concannon???
mike
|
111.5 | The Purple people eaters. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:14 | 8 |
|
What about all those great Viking players? They don't have any rings.
Steve
|
111.6 | | CAM::WAY | When Nick returns: Mother of all Parties | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:21 | 17 |
| Geez, guys....Read what I wrote.
I didn't say you NEEDED a ring to make the hall of Fame. After all
it's the Hall of Fame, not the Corridor of Champeens.
What I said was that the article I read put forth the premise that
when you have a ring, it's easier to get into the HoF. The more
rings the better...
There's lots of guys in the HoF who don't have rings.....
Lotsa tough old bastards in their too, who I'll bet played before
they even thought of having a ring for a champeenship....
'Saw
PS anyone know when the ring first became fashionable?
|
111.7 | A new name will be added soon. | CAM::MAZUR | It ain't the meat, it's the lotion. | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:23 | 2 |
| Earl Campbell will *soon* be on this list (He hasn't been inducted yet,
has he ?)
|
111.8 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:34 | 9 |
| I wasn't trying to rag on ya `saw. I'm just curious. I wonder how many
there are without rings. What I'm thinking is that there's probably more
without than with.
Is there a list somewhere of who all is in the HoF? If we could get that
posted, then we could squabble about whether they had a ring or not!
;'D
Mike JN
|
111.9 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:34 | 4 |
| If I get ambitious enough over the next couple of days, I can post a
list of Hall of Famers because I have it at home.
John
|
111.10 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Surrender Dorothy and Saddam | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:46 | 9 |
|
Max Yazgur.
Johnny Appleseed.
The guy in the Del (can't think of his name).
Oh....I thought somebody said "Hall of Farmers". Nevermind.
Dickstah
|
111.11 | 8^) | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Thu Feb 28 1991 08:30 | 7 |
|
Dickstah! How could you forget Old McDonald???? Geesh, the guy
literaly transformed the art of animal farming.
Steve
|
111.12 | | CAM::WAY | When Nick returns: Mother of all Parties | Thu Feb 28 1991 08:32 | 11 |
| � Dickstah! How could you forget Old McDonald???? Geesh, the guy
� literaly transformed the art of animal farming.
Don't forget Steve, that Old MacDonald ALSO had a recent and profound
effect on our very own Digital Equipment Corp. Why, my group is part
of the
EIS/EIC/EIEIO
'Saw
|
111.13 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Feb 28 1991 08:44 | 47 |
| I have the list of Hall of Fame inductees and I'll get it typed in
sometime today. My friend Pete Palmer did a study of Hall of Fame
inductees and found the parameters for induction seem to be as follows:
1. Having played on a Super Bowl Championship team. This is helping
the Packers of the 60s and the Steelers of the 70s and will probably
help the Forty Niners of the 80s. It hasn't really helped the Dolphins
of the early 70s. This can also lead to an overkill backlash where
voters feel that too many have been inducted from the same team.
2. All-league teams, specifically, being named to the Pro Bowl, the AP
All-league team and the Football Writers all-league team. MVP awards
and other all-league teams seem to carry little weight.
3. Career stats help, but not as much as you might think. The
all-time interception leader still hasn't been elected. *QUARTERBACKS
ARE RANKED MORE ON WINNING GAMES THAN WINNING PASSING TITLES.*
Efficiency seems to be more important than quality.
4. Career length in and of itself doesn't help. Sticking around too
long may work against a candidate.
5. Other factors - stay alive, stay out of jail, stay visible (ie,
coaching or TV).
Hall of Fame voting procedure:
o Anyone can nominate anyone simply by writing to the Hall of Fame.
Players must have been retired for 5 years and coaches for 1 year.
o 30 people make up the Hall of Fame selectors. This body is made up
of one media person for each NFL team, an "at large" media veteran and
a representative from the Football Writers of America
o These selectors get the list of nominees down to 14. There's an
Oldtimer's Committee within the board who nominates a 15th
representative from the past who is expected to have had 60% of his
career 25 years before the election.
o The selectors then vote on these 15 nominees to narrow the list to
7 nominees
o The final vote is held on the Saturday before the Super Bowl.
Procedural rules state that each class has at least 4 but no more than
7 members.
John
|
111.14 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Unitas, Montana, Schwarzkopf | Thu Feb 28 1991 09:22 | 8 |
|
What determines when a coach is "retired?"
Isn't it possible for a coach to achieve greatness, then come back out
of retirement and be dismally ineffective for another 15 years?
Dickstah
|
111.15 | Hall of Famers | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Feb 28 1991 10:17 | 102 |
| The Hall of Fame was founded in 1963 and its charter members are Sammy Baugh,
Bert Bell, Joe Carr, Dutch Clark, Red Grange, George Halas, Mel Hein, Pete
Henry, Don Hutson, Cal Hubbard, Curly Lambeau, Tim Mara, George Preston Mar-
shall, Johnny Blood (McNally), Bronko Nagurski, Ernie Nevers, and Jim Thorpe
George Halas was inducted while still active as a coach. Paul Brown was induc-
ted 5 years after leaving the Browns and a year before he founded the Bengals.
He was the head coach of the Bengals for their first 8 years of existence.
I don't have the list of the 1991 inductees in front of me but here are the mem-
bers of the Hall of Fame through 1990 (I tried to put them in two even columns
but I must have counted wrong)
Herb Adderley 1980 Don Hutson 1963
Lance Alworth 1978 John Henry Johnson 1987
Doug Atkins 1982 Deacon Jones 1980
Red Badgro 1981 Sonny Jurgensen 1983
Cliff Battles 1968 Walt Kiesling 1966
Sammy Baugh 1963 Bruiser Kinard 1971
Chuck Bednarik 1967 Curly Lambeau 1963
Bert Bell 1963 Jack Lambert 1990
Bobby Bell 1983 Tom Landry 1990
Raymond Berry 1973 Night Train Lane 1974
Charles Bidwill 1967 Jim Langer 1987
Fred Biletnikoff 1988 Willie Lanier 1986
George Blanda 1981 Yale Lary 1979
Mel Blount 1989 Dante Lavelli 1975
Terry Bradshaw 1989 Bobby Layne 1967
Jim Brown 1971 Tuffy Leemans 1978
Paul Brown 1967 Bob Lilly 1980
Roosevelt Brown 1975 Vince Lombardi 1971
Willie Brown 1984 Sid Luckman 1965
Buck Buchanan 1990 Link Lyman 1964
Dick Butkus 1979 Tim Mara 1963
Tony Canadeo 1974 Gino Marchetti 1972
Joe Carr 1963 George Preston Marshall 1963
Guy Chamberlin 1965 Ollie Matson 1972
Jack Christiansen 1970 Don Maynard 1987
Dutch Clark 1963 George McAfee 1966
George Connor 1975 Mike McCormack 1984
Jimmy Conzelman 1964 Hugh McElhenny 1970
Larry Csonka 1987 Johnny Blood (McNally) 1963
Willie Davis 1981 Mike Michalske 1964
Len Dawson 1987 Wayne Millner 1968
Mike Ditka 1988 Bobby Mitchell 1983
Art Donovan 1968 Ron Mix 1979
Paddy Driscoll 1965 Lenny Moore 1975
Bill Dudley 1966 Marion Motley 1968
Turk Edwards 1969 George Musso 1982
Weeb Ewbank 1978 Bronko Nagurski 1963
Tom Fears 1970 Joe Namath 1985
Ray Flaherty 1976 Greasy Neale 1969
Len Ford 1976 Ernie Nevers 1963
Dan Fortmann 1965 Ray Nitschke 1978
Frank Gatski 1985 Leo Nomellini 1969
Bill George 1974 Merlin Olsen 1982
Frank Gifford 1977 Jim Otto 1980
Sid Gillman 1983 Steve Owen 1966
Otto Graham 1965 Alan Page 1988
Red Grange 1963 Ace Parker 1972
Joe Greene 1987 Jim Parker 1973
Forrest Gregg 1977 Joe Perry 1969
Bob Griese 1990 Pete Pihos 1970
Lou Groza 1974 Shorty Ray 1966
Joe Guyon 1966 Dan Reeves 1967
George Halas 1963 Jim Ringo 1981
Jack Ham 1988 Andy Robustelli 1971
Franco Harris 1990 Art Rooney 1964
Ed Healey 1964 Pete Rozelle 1985
Mel Hein 1963 Bob St Clair 1990
Ted Hendricks 1990 Gale Sayers 1977
Pete Henry 1963 Joe Schmidt 1973
Arnie Herber 1966 Art Shell 1989
Bill Hewitt 1971 OJ Simpson 1985
Clarke Hinkle 1964 Bart Starr 1977
CrazyLegs Hirsch 1968 Roger Staubach 1985
Paul Hornung 1986 Ernie Stautner 1969
Ken Houston 1986 Ken Strong 1967
Cal Hubbard 1963 Joe Stydahar 1967
Sam Huff 1982 Fran Tarkenton 1986
Lamar Hunt 1972 Charley Taylor 1984
Jim Taylor 1976
Jim Thorpe 1963
YA Tittle 1971
George Trafton 1964
Charley Trippi 1968
Emlen Tunnell 1967
Bulldog Turner 1966
Johnny Unitas 1979
Gene Upshaw 1987
Norm Van Brocklin 1971
Steve Van Buren 1965
Doak Walker 1986
Paul Warfield 1983
Bob Waterfield 1965
Arnie Weinmeister 1984
Bill Willis 1977
Larry Wilson 1978
Alex Wojciechowicz 1968
Willie Wood 1989
|
111.16 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 28 1991 12:15 | 2 |
| Can someone be inducted twice, once as a player, the second time as a
coach?
|
111.17 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Thu Feb 28 1991 13:08 | 11 |
| Thanks John... that takes a lot of work.
It's amazing (to me) but there's about sixty names there that I haven't
got the vaguest notion who they are.
Also....
How in the hell did Danny Boy Reeves get into the HoF!?!?
I remember him as a journeyman running back, but I never had
thought of him as HoF material.
Mike JN
|
111.18 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Feb 28 1991 13:28 | 11 |
| I *KNEW* someone would fall for that one!
The Dan Reeves who is in the Hall of Fame was the founder and owner of
the Rams from 1941-1971 when (right before his death) he sold the team
to Robert Irsay, who in turn traded it to Carroll Rosenbloom for the
Colts. Rosenbloom wanted the Rams but was going to get hit with a big
inheritance tax so he had Irsay buy the Rams and made the trade.
Rosenbloom later re-married (his wife, Georgia Frontiere now owns the
Rams) and Rosenbloom drowned under some mysterious circumstances.
John
|
111.19 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Feb 28 1991 14:53 | 32 |
| Keith MacNeal asked about people being inducted more than once. No one
has, but the following have been inducted for contributions in more
than one area:
Bert Bell Founder of the Eagles, Commissioner 1946-59
Guy Chamberlin Player and coach in the twenties
Ray Flaherty Player and coach
George Halas Player, coach, team owner
Walt Kiesling Player and coach
Steve Owen Player and coach
Tom Landry is in as a coach but not for his playing, for example.
Raymond Berry and Mike Ditka are in as players but probably won't be as
coaches. If Chuck Noll ever gets inducted, it will be as a player, not
as a coach. Art Shell is the only other one in there who I can think
of who might go on to have a great coaching career.
The only person I can think of who has Hall of Fame credentials in more
than one area is Al Davis - as Commissioner of the AFL (note: it's not
the NFL Hall of Fame, it's the Pro Football Hall of Fame), founder and
owner of the Raiders and as a coach.
The most under-represented areas in the Hall of Fame are, as players,
Tight Ends. The only one in there is Mike Ditka. The other area is in
officiating. The only one in there as an official is Shorty Ray, who
was Supervisor from 1938-56. That could change with the retirements of
Art McNally and especially Jim Tunney. Tunney is the youngest official
ever hired by the NFL (age 30), the youngest man to become a referee
(age 37), the only referee to ever work 2 consecutive Super Bowls and I
think he worked at least 3 total.
John
|
111.20 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Feb 28 1991 15:00 | 10 |
|
re: John
John, don't you need to reverse your statement about Chuck Noll?
At best he was only an average player for the Browns. As coach of the
Steelers, he has won 4 Superbowls. When, and not if, he is inducted,
it will be as a coach.
bill..g.
|
111.21 | Mackey should have been in before Dikta | EARRTH::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Thu Feb 28 1991 15:12 | 6 |
| TE is a relatively new position, hence not as many great players. And
the fact that the selection committee is pro-establishment and petty is
denying John Mackey (voted the greatest TE in NFL history) his rightful
spot n the Hall of Fame.
And what the Hall is doing to Al Davis is beyond a travesty.
|
111.22 | oops | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Feb 28 1991 15:26 | 4 |
| Bill, I obviously meant inducted as a coach, not as a player.
Something got scrambled between the brain and the fingers. thanks
|
111.23 | | CAM::WAY | When Nick returns: Mother of all Parties | Thu Feb 28 1991 15:44 | 4 |
| I'm surprised Forrest Gregg is in, but Jerry Kramer isn't. I always
thought Kramer was better than Gregg, but that's just opinion I guess....
'Saw
|
111.24 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Industrial Strength Noter | Thu Feb 28 1991 15:48 | 6 |
| Kramer wrote a book and threw the block that got Bart Starr
in the end zone to end the Ice Bowl game, but I don't know that
he was better than Gregg, (Fuzzy Thurston was better than both) just
more recognizable.
/Don
|
111.25 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Feb 28 1991 15:48 | 5 |
| Dock is correct about John Mackey. The Russ Francis/Dave Casper mold
was taken completely from John Mackey.
Rich
|
111.26 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Thu Feb 28 1991 16:56 | 20 |
| re .23
Kramer was more hyped than Gregg, but I don't know about better ....
Kinda like the Swann/Stallworth arguments .... Swann was graceful,
made all of the highlight reel catches, but I'd vote for Stallworth in
the HoF ahead of Swann - without hesitation.
re John_H
The NFL's all time pass thief was Paul Krauss if I remember right. I
used to follow the Vikes as a kid, and I remember Krauss being a good
safety, but hardly great. In fact, he was the wimpiest 'hitter' that I
remember in the secondary. PK was the anthesis of Ronny Lott. Wideouts
didn't fear him, and when I saw **Franco (Slip,Fall, and Run Out of
Bounds) Harris** run up his chest, I strongly believe that he would
have been a better nickle back today.
No, I don't think he was one of the greats .... a very good player at
best, usually very solid or better. But no HoFer ....
|
111.27 | Crazy thought : Winslow in the Run and Shoot | EARRTH::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Thu Feb 28 1991 16:59 | 6 |
| re .25
Thanks Rich (where the hell have you been hiding ? :-).
BTW, I'm casting my ballot for Kellen Winslow right now. When is he
eligible ?
|
111.28 | Mackey was better than Ditka | VIA::SMEGOL::COHEN | | Thu Feb 28 1991 21:42 | 8 |
|
Mackey was also well known for running over a variety of defensive players
on his way to the goal line (ala Mark Bavaro).
Considering that Mackey was voted the best tight end in the NFL for the
1st 50 years (while Ditka was also playing) and it's a joke he's not
in the HOF.
|
111.29 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Mar 01 1991 11:24 | 20 |
|
re: John
Knowing you in here, I thought that you simply got the words mixed
up, but better me pointing it out than one of the other
broken_record.com noters.. A simple mistake, no problem.
re: Doc
Why would Stallworth get in and not Swann? The only thing
Stallworth had/has over Swann was the fact that he played longer and
thus had more receptions. Before Swann retired, Swann was the No. 1
receiver on the team. Swann also returned punts during his first
couple of seasons, and I believe led the league. Both of them have
4 Superbowl rings with Swann also being a SB MVP. Swann retired
because of injury after only 7 seasons. Stallworth continued on
and to his credit, developed into a fine receiver. But IMO, when they
were both playing, Swann was the better of the two...but not by much.
bill..g.
|
111.30 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Fri Mar 01 1991 15:15 | 18 |
| > BTW, I'm casting my ballot for Kellen Winslow right now. When is he
> eligible ?
I'm not sure Kellen will make it. If not for that knee injury.
The Chargers have 3 in Canton: Lance Alworth, Ron Mix & Sid Gillman
I would expect to see Dan Fouts and Charlie Joiner added to that list.
Maybe Winslow, but I'm not as confident. What's interesting is that
all inductees are from the offensive side of the ball. Granted Gillman
was the coach, but it was his offensive football that got him inducted.
One other note of interest: When I was at Canton, I expected the team
displays to be protected somehow. I reached right over the banister
and touched Alworth's jersey. I expected some photocell security or
alarms and whistles or somethin', but there was no alarm at all. Kind
of interesting.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
111.31 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Fri Mar 01 1991 16:40 | 21 |
| re .29
I dunno Goose. I guess Stallworth never got the recognition that Swann
did. Remember Super Bowl XIII (?) against the Rams ? Stallworth made a
couple of fantastic over-the-shoulder grabs in the 4th quarter. The
first bomb gave the Steelers the lead, the 2nd one clinched the game.
And Bradshaw got the MVP and press .....
More than anything else, it appeared to me that Stallworth was by far
the tougher reciever. I remember Tatum and Ken Riley (?) saying that if
you banged on Swann, he'd slow down. Stallworth was much more likely to
stick his nose in the action in the 4th quarter against a physical team
than Swann was, and in their opinion, Stallworth was a bigger headache
for a secondary than Swann. I tend to feel the same way, if not as strongly.
Mind you, I'm not calling Swann a wimp (even if does have a girly-mon
name :-), I am saying that Stallworth was a tougher player (he was also
the bigger of the two, and I liked him for that.
Either way, I can't go wrong ....
|
111.32 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Fri Mar 01 1991 16:44 | 10 |
| I'm kinda shaky on Kellen's longevity factor. I'd rate him as one of
the best to play that position, but it seems to me that he wasn't good
over a long period of time, and I'm not sure I'd consider him a
`complete' Tight End.... although I could be full of crap... but I don't
remember anybody ever calling him a blocking fool.
Riley Odoms, for the Donks, didn't have the single year numbers, but was
considered a premier tight end for a lot of years.
Mike JN
|
111.33 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Fri Mar 01 1991 16:51 | 24 |
| re .32 .30
I'd cast a vote of Odoms too. As for Winslow, he played from 1979-1989,
11 seasons or so and came back from a major knee injury to be a solid
player.
Granted, the injury hurts his chances, but from 1979-86, he was the
ultimate TE. Speed, power, and a good (if not devasting) blocker.
Remember that the Chargers were a passing team, and that Winslow was
part of that attack.
I didn't really appreciate his talents until his retirement. I thought
Keith Jackson would follow in his footsteps, but he isn't nearly the
deep threat I'd thought he'd be.
Back to Winslow ... maybe injuries hurt him, but Gayle Sayers played
less time than Winslow, and it can be argued that WInslow impacted the
TE position at least as much as Sayers did for RB's.
And of course we all know about Namath, who basically had three or four
good years, and the rest was injuries and old age. If Namath is
deserving, I know Winslow is.
Doc
|
111.34 | Both deserve to be in HoF | SHALOT::MEDVID | god is war,TV preacher tell me more | Fri Mar 01 1991 16:56 | 9 |
| Lynn Swann was one of football's all-time great receivers. He was made
better only because opponents chose to doubleteam Stallworth in this
no-win coverage situation.
Stallworth was the better of the two. Swann, however, deserves to be in
the HoF also and I can't believe he was passed over for the likes of
Earl Campbell this year.
--dan'l
|
111.36 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I was testing the bounds of reality | Sun Mar 03 1991 10:16 | 12 |
|
Dock why don't you and Tatum give it a break will ya. Harris didn't gain
all those yards and make the HOF for running out of bounds. The man punished
people inside and out and saved himself a little wear and tear now and then.
Tatum's motives were understandable, he was out to sell books and as a Raider
naturally had a hatried for Franco the Steeler. Franco was an awesome back
who doesn't deserve the knock that has followed him thanks to a mediocre
corner who's only claim to fame is that he hit hard and talks a good game...
mike
|
111.37 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Mon Mar 04 1991 09:49 | 30 |
| re .35
Earl Campbell was the most intimidating runner in football for five
years. Bar none. From what I've seen in films, only Jim Brown could
punish tacklers the way Earl could, and in his prime you saw defenders
trying their damnest to avoid collisions with him.
True, his longevity wasn't as great as some other backs (I blame Bum
Phillips for that), but he was at the top of his class long enough IMO
to be a HoF shoo-in. Swann will get in eventually, probably next year,
but he wasn't as dominating a WR as Campbell was a RB. That isn't a
knock on Swann either - that was a result of playing on a Chuck Noll
offense.
re .36
Mike, Tatum wasn't the only guy to say that about Franco. Far from it.
And from what I gathered, Tatum wasn't really slamming Swann, he was
stating fact. Swann wasn't a big guy, and was somewhat fragile. He
wasn't a wimp, but he wasn't a ironman. And if you rocked him early and
hard, you could take the starch out of some of his crossing routes
(which wasn't helped by the fact that Bradshaw had a bad habit early in
his career of throwing balls 8 feet high over the middle) - Stallworth
was a different breed of cat.
Both deserve to go in the HoF, but I'd want Stallworth on my team if I
had to pick a WR from the Steelers, and esp. if I didn't have a
Stallworth-type on my roster ....
Doc
|
111.38 | The backs deserve mention. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Mon Mar 04 1991 09:55 | 10 |
|
Doc, what about, Larry Czonka, Marion Motley and John Riggins?
I would consider them in the "hurting the opponent" category
along with Brown and Campbell. Larry Czonka actually used to
draw personal fouls from the way he used to stick it to defenders.
Marion Motley was a friggen load and a half! The guy used to carry
defenders across the goal line and then spike them, thinking they
were the ball! 8^)
Steve
|
111.39 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | IS this the Sox year?? | Mon Mar 04 1991 11:01 | 15 |
| Doc,
How could you forget Jim Taylor, in my book, he was better than any
other runner except Jim Brown. Earl was a load, that's fer sure, and
one of my favs when he played. And if you really want to go back, how
bout Bronko Nagurski???
Out of the bunch, however, Jim Brown made the best movies, and Earl the
best commercial (Skoal, brother) with ZOnk's cruise ship commercials a
close second.
Campbell was punishing, but he also got the worst of the hits than any
of the other punishing back named.
JD
|
111.40 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Mon Mar 04 1991 11:30 | 22 |
| re .38 .39
Good notes gents. And I realize that I may be biased. But with all due
respect to Larry C., Earl was also faster than the Zonk. Motley was a
great one, but he also wasn't keyed on as much as Earl. Riggins is one
of the more underrated backs of his time, but he didn't intimidate
players the way Earl did.
I remember times when Earl would blast through the line, and you would
see some serious half-hearted attempts at 'tackling' on the part of
DB's and many LB's.
Seldom do you ever see offensive players intimidate defenders - it is
usually the other way around.
For me it is the combination of speed AND power that separated Campbell
from Taylor and Czonka. (Note : I'm speaking of pure running ability,
not blocking and pass receiving.)
Nagurski was a legend, I would have loved to have seen him in action.
And the stories about him and his power are legend ... my favorite was
the time he pointed directions to a traveler - with a plow ..... :-)
|
111.41 | All it took was one clean shot. | SHALOT::MEDVID | god is war,TV preacher tell me more | Mon Mar 04 1991 11:58 | 5 |
| And I remember when Donnie Shell ended Earl Campbell's career with one
hit. Earl was never the same after that smack in the ribs. Maybe
Franco knew what he was doing when he headed for the sideline's, huh?
--dan'l
|
111.42 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Mon Mar 04 1991 12:07 | 29 |
| What? No one has mentioned Alan "The Horse" Ameche, a Baltimore Colt?
One tough son-of-a-gun.
My favorite, tho, was Jim Taylor, and for this reason: He used to
*look* for a defender after getting thru the line and then *AIM* at
them! He did it in a gome one time, broke thru the line and into the
secondary. He could angle himself into the endzone, only one guy left.
But no, he ran right at that defender, bowled him over, then rambled
into the endzone.
Later, Lombardi asked him why he did it. His reply was something like
"Just wanted to rough 'em up, coach."
There have been some very tough, and very punishing runners in
football.
Campbell was certainly near the top. With thighs that resemble the
average guy's waist, he was some specimen. Doc, I agree that Phillips
probably shortened his career. Too bad.
One guy who never got to play in the NFL was Ernie Davis. He was one
of those great runners from Syracuse, but died before he ever played a
game as a pro. What a shame. I understand he was a very nice person,
too.
Can anyone list the string of runners Syracuse had, starting with Jim
Brown and going in order?
Lee
|
111.43 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | IS this the Sox year?? | Mon Mar 04 1991 13:13 | 16 |
| Lee
Jim Brown
FLyod Little
Larry Czonka
were 3 of em.
I know I'm forgetting some - used to know it by heart.
Never saw "The Horse", except in hilite films - but my dad anguishes
over the name, since Ameche is the guy who scored the winning TD in
"The Greatest Game Ever Played" - The Colts OT win over the Giants in
58.
JD
|
111.44 | ? | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Mon Mar 04 1991 13:20 | 5 |
|
Didn't Leroy Kelly go to Syracuse?
Steve
|
111.45 | | HPSRAD::SANTOS | Rosanna looked awful in Playboy | Mon Mar 04 1991 13:23 | 7 |
| JD,
How could you have forgotten lil' Joe Morris. I believe hes the
all-time SU rushing leader too.
Chuck
|
111.46 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Mar 04 1991 13:53 | 27 |
| I'll look it up tonight, but the SU parade of running backs goes
something like this:
Jim Brown (who was also All-American in lacrosse and who used to play
by cradling the ball against his chest and then bulling his
way up the field)
Ernie Davis
Jim Nance
Floyd Little
Larry Csonka
Then a gap of a few years before Joe Morris, and they really haven't
had a truly outstanding runner since. They've had some good ones but
not the great one. Syracuse's leading offensive players since the Dome
was built have been wide receivers - Tommy Kane, Scott Schwedes (yes,
he's Gerhard Schwedes' son), Rob Carpenter and Rob Moore.
I don't think Leroy Kelly went to Syracuse but I'll check tonight.
I'll be able to determine whether or not he went to SU, but if not, I
don't think I'll be able to look up exactly where he went.
John
|
111.47 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | NY Yankees: Columbia's Team | Mon Mar 04 1991 14:33 | 4 |
|
I thought Alan Ameche was real good in that movie about all the old
people that went swimming in that space alien swimming pool and learnt
how to break dance. Wasn't Lee in that movie, too?
|
111.48 | | CAM::WAY | Gonna tell Aunt Mary 'bout Uncle John | Mon Mar 04 1991 15:37 | 19 |
| > I thought Alan Ameche was real good in that movie about all the old
> people that went swimming in that space alien swimming pool and learnt
> how to break dance. Wasn't Lee in that movie, too?
Yeah, Lee is that guy who hypes oatmeal on TV.
In that movie, all those old folks used to eat oatmeal and have lotsa
prune juice every morning. Nexted thing you know, they found the
fountain of youth after they mated with the aliens ( the movie didn't
show that part, but it was heavily implied).
So, anyway, they all stopped eating oatmeal and prune juice, and started
having tacos and beer for breakfast.
They also beat a bunch of young guys on the hoops court, but those guys
were really Snuffy Smif's men, and everybody knows they cain't play D.....
'Saw
|
111.49 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Mar 04 1991 16:34 | 35 |
| Lee,
I recall watching the Packers/Giants games of ??? years ago and
watching Jim Taylor line up Sam Huff. Both taylor and Jim Brown felt
that Huff was over rated and always attempted to show him him. Jim
brown had the speed and power of a locomotive. The best ever. He could
give you the tough inside yards or could turn on the juice outside if
needed.
John Hendry brought up a name that has been forgotten; Jim Nance. Nance
led the AFL in rushing one year and ran very much like Jim Brown. I
remember seeing a game where he burst through the line and got into the
secondar and OUTRAN the cornerbacks.
There were other great ones. Someone brought up Marion Motley. Has
anyone seen the clip where some guy tackled him so hard that his
(Motley) helmet popped off and yet he still carried the ball and that
tackler over 15 yards downfield?
How about Lenny Moore or John David Crowe or Don Bass or Larry Brown?
Then there were Paul Woods, Cookie Gilchrist, Abner Haynes, Matt Snell
and Emerson Boozer.
I would have to rate the best power backs, though as follows:
1. Jim Brown
2. Earl Campbell
3. Jim Taylor
4. Cookie Gilchrist
5. John Riggins
To see Jim Brown play made you love the guy.
Rich
|
111.50 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Tue Mar 05 1991 06:58 | 32 |
| Rich, I'd have to put Czonka on that list somewhere.
Yeah, I always thought Huff was overrated, too. I blamed Chris
Schenkel for it, he was the Gints TV man back then and he'd announce
that Huff either made the stop or was in on the tackle, almost every
play. I didn't see it, but supposedly he once said Huff was in on the
tackle, while he was on the bench during that particular play!
Jim Nance was a tough son-of-a-gun, too, but I wouldn't rate him in the
top 15 or so, even tho I'm a Pats fan.
If you want to talk just about tough, Leon Hart was one tough guy. He
played for the Lions back during the 50's. One game, he got a kickoff
and was coming up the left sideline. A defender hit him
helmet-to-helmet. The defender was carried off of the field
unconscious, Hart just kept running down the sideline. He wasn't a
running back, tho.
Seems to me John David Crow was a pretty rough guy, too.
Cookie Gilchrist, yeah a mean man for those Bills.
There was one other guy that always got my attention. He had to be
tough, he was only 5'4" or so. Charlie Tolar, the "Human Cannonball",
also known as the "Human Manholecover". He ran so close to the ground,
tacklers would get really frustrated trying to bring him down. Played
for the Oilers, I believe.
Enough digression, tho. Suffice it to say they have been many, many
tough characters in the NFL.
Lee
|
111.51 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Mar 05 1991 08:22 | 10 |
| Leroy Kelly went to Morgan State, not Syracuse.
The big name rushers at Syracuse were as listed yesterday - Brown
(54-56), Davis (59-61), Nance (62-64), Little (64-66), Csonka (65-67)
and Morris (78-81). Of that list, Morris leads all time with 4299,
then Csonka with 2934, then Little with 2704, then Bill Hurley (QB from
75-79) with 2551, then Davis with 2386. Brown is 8th all time with
2091.
John
|
111.52 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Industrial Strength Noter | Tue Mar 05 1991 12:45 | 8 |
| Huff overrated? Could it be because he played in New York?
Nah! Jim Nance used to have a weight problem. I remember one year
they threatened to make him a defensive lineman if he didn't trim
down. Really the guy had about 2-3 great years and that was it.
But in those 2-3 years he certainly was exciting. If he played
in New York, who knows?
/Don
|
111.53 | Okay Medvid - time to return to the real world ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Tue Mar 05 1991 15:13 | 50 |
|
re .41
> And I remember when Donnie Shell ended Earl Campbell's career with one
> hit. Earl was never the same after that smack in the ribs. Maybe
> Franco knew what he was doing when he headed for the sideline's, huh?
HAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA !!!!!!!!!!!
Dan'l what is next ?
Goldilocks and the 3 Bears ?
Goose, PLEASE straighten this fool out !!!!!
I remember the game quite well. And needless to say, Dan'l has lost
most of the real facts with time ....
It was Earl's rookie year, and the Steelers were playing at the Dome.
The game was for the AFC Central lead, and talk about a war ! I think a
combined 7-8 players were knocked out of that game due to the hitting.
Anyhow, it was the first half, and Earl got a handoff, blew through the
hole, ran over a guy, spun out of 2nd defender ... and WHAM ! Shell was
good and lucky enough to blast Earl in the ribs with his helmet.
Result : Earl left the game, and missed the next one due to cracked
ribs.
Now remember people, this was Campbell's ROOKIE year .... according to
the FAcks Man (Dan'l), Earl's career took a nosedive after the hit.
So tell me, who was taking the handoffs from Pastorini when the Oilers
made the playoffs and went to the AFC title game ?
Who was that No 34 dude who took the Oiler back to that game the next
year ?
And who rushed for over 1900 yards the year after that ????
Well Dan'l ???
And I thought Schneider was clueless in the facts department ....
Doc
p.s. As hard as Shell's hit was, it only ranked NO 2 on my hit list on
Campbell. Jack Tatum *drilled* Campbell earlier that season. He hit
him so hard that Earl got turned around, and staggered backwards into
the end zone. Tatum fell like a tree. One awesome hit.
|
111.54 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Mar 05 1991 15:28 | 21 |
|
Well Doc, since you asked, I don't remember the hit! How's that
for honesty?
But, what I do remember is that Campbell was an awesome runner
no doubt about it. He'd probably rank right up there in the top 3-5
if he didn't go out early. Mind you, for those 7 years he was awesome.
But the main thing I remember is that Campbell never ran well
against the Steeler's. I think his per carry stat against the
Steeler's was little over 2 yards per. The Steeler's always seemed to
handle Earl real well and in fact, I can't remember Earl killing the
Steeler's, but I'd have to check.
Other than the fact that the Oilers burnt him out against the
league and more importantly against the Steeler's, he was a great
runner.
bill..g.
|
111.55 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Tue Mar 05 1991 16:09 | 19 |
| re .54
Goose, I remember Campbell having a huge Monday night game against the
Steeler's (3TD's), and a coupel of other good games, but I'd agree with
you, Earl never ripped the Steel Curtain for 150-200 yard games.
But just remember that the Steelers also used to bring 7-8, sometimes
NINE men up to the LoS to stop Earl. Nobody can run against that type
of front, and usually the games were in December, when you had a slick
turf, cutbacks were next to impossible.
Even so, if the Oilers had had a better coach than Bum Phillips, they
would have developed a stragdy to beat that kind of defense (like how
about some more 1st down passing Bum !) - but they didn't.
But the only man I ever saw run successfully against the Steelers with
any consistency was OJ Simpson. I'll never forget the time he ran for
220+ yards on the Curtain - the best performance by a back against a
superior team that I have ever seen ...
|
111.56 | We Luv'a Blue | HPSRAD::SANTOS | Rosanna looked awful in Playboy | Tue Mar 05 1991 16:40 | 11 |
| The biggest reason Campbell was shot after 5 years in the league was
because the man paid no attention to conditioning. He never worked out
during the off season and was always out of shape. The guy was a physical
speciment and didn't need to be in top shape to run over people but
after a while it caught up with him.
He was dead tired after every run and it took him along time to get up.
It seemed he was hurt on every play but sure enough on the next play
he was as good as new. He was fun to watch
Chuck
|
111.57 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Tue Mar 05 1991 17:45 | 8 |
| re .56
That is true Chuck. Earl was no Payton in the area of off-season
conditioning. But I also have no doubt that Bum Phillips ran him into
the ground. And that, combined with his style (Earl absorbed a lot more
hits than most backs) led to an early burnout.
But for 5-6 years, he was incredible ....
|
111.58 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Mar 06 1991 14:19 | 23 |
|
re: campbell
Doc, below are the stats that I have (only the 70's) of what Earl
did against the Steelers. He did better than I had though, but didn't
have the great rushing game.
1978 Oct. 23 @ Pitts. 3TD's, 21-89 yards, Houston won 24-17
Dec. 3 @ Hous. 0TD's, 7-41 yards, Pitts. won 13-3
playoffs Jan. 7 @ Pitts. 0TD's, 22-62 yards, Pitts. won 34-5
1979 Sep. 8 @ Pitts. 0TD's, 16-38 yards, Pitts. won 38-7
Dec. 10 @ Hous. 0TD's, 33-109 yds., Houston won 20-17
playoffs Jan. 6 @ Pitts. 0TD's, 17-15 yards, Pitts. won 27-13
All told in six meetings during the 70's, he scored 3 TD's and
rushed for 354 yards on 116 carries which averages out to 3 yards per
carry. I don't know what his totals were against the Steelers in the
80's.
bill..g.
|
111.59 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Wed Mar 06 1991 16:45 | 1 |
| Thanks. It was the 12/3/78 game that involved the D. Shell hit.
|
111.60 | | JUPITR::PARTEE | Charlie -- Lemieux est le mieux | Wed Mar 06 1991 21:04 | 12 |
|
> playoffs Jan. 7 @ Pitts. 0TD's, 22-62 yards, Pitts. won 34-5
This was a great game. My memory is that Campbell actually left
the game late in the 4th because he was so ineffective against
the Curtain. I remember having to go to some f&*(ing family thing
(still p.o.ed about that, actually) during the first half, rushing
home to turn on the game, and seeing Campbell on the screen with
his 1st half stats: 17 rushes for 34 yards. Psyche!
Charlie
|
111.61 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Thu Mar 07 1991 08:19 | 11 |
| I suspect that Campbell left the game late in the final period because
the Oilers were down by 29 points. Methinks that any other team in the
same spot would have pulled it's star too.
I remember that game being played on a sheet of ice, and by the time
the Oilers had gotten used to it, the Steelers had effectively ended the
game.
Houston had already won two straight playoff games on the road - to
take out the Steelers in Three Rivers was a huge job, and one the young
Oilers were not up to ....
|
111.62 | New Years Eve | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Mar 08 1991 07:13 | 3 |
| One of those road victories was the only playoff game ever in
Foxboro. sure was cold that day!!
Denny
|
111.63 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYou | Fri Mar 08 1991 07:51 | 4 |
| Hey Denny I was at that game too. Didn't someone throw a grill
or something at Fairbanks when the game was over?
/Don
|
111.64 | Wouldn't be surprised though | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Mar 12 1991 21:36 | 3 |
| I remember plenty of verbal abuse being flung at ol' Chuckie, but
don't remember the grill.
Denny
|