T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
97.1 | | SHIRE::ELLIS | | Thu Feb 07 1991 03:34 | 10 |
| >> Hockey pucks? $20 - $35(Gretzky) How do they sign a puck?
Clearly, the higher the price, the lighter coloured ink they use.
For 20 bucks, they use black, and you have to take their word that Gretzky
signed it since you cain't really see it.
HTH,
rick
|
97.2 | | USWRSL::CHERNOFF_CR | | Thu Feb 07 1991 11:39 | 2 |
| Please send me the phone # @ uswrsl Chernoff_Cr or call me at DTN
521-3752
|
97.3 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Thu Feb 07 1991 12:42 | 7 |
| I saw a button the other day:
God made grass
Man made booze
Who can you trust?
Mike JN
|
97.4 | Owlsley maybe? | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | TearyEyedYellowRibbonSobNation | Thu Feb 07 1991 13:45 | 1 |
|
|
97.5 | FYI | UPWARD::HEISER | where roses grow | Thu Feb 14 1991 22:48 | 4 |
|
Friday at 8:11:06 PM all the Unix machines in the world will
register 666,666,666 seconds since the start of Unix time.
|
97.6 | like ~21.14 years ago? Big deal-still junk*) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Thu Feb 14 1991 22:55 | 1 |
|
|
97.7 | | CAM::WAY | The Axe-master | Fri Feb 15 1991 09:40 | 8 |
| � -< like ~21.14 years ago? Big deal-still junk*) >-
Guess you can always tell those who like to play and those who don't ;^)
'Saw
|
97.8 | How much have salaries sky-rocketed in 11 years? | WFOV12::MORRISON | Homer Simpson's twin brother | Mon Feb 18 1991 12:21 | 9 |
|
Under "FOR THE RECORD" in the latest SI
The contract that Roger Clemens signed is worth $400,000 more than
the then-record sum that Nelson Doubleday paid for the New York Mets
in 1980.
Bull~
|
97.9 | Correcting errors in replies | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 21 1991 14:32 | 8 |
| If you enter a reply and realize there is a mistake, it is very easy to
correct. Simply delete that reply (by typing DELETE at the Notes>
prompt) and then type REPLY/LAST. I think this will also work for
errors in a basenote - delete then type WRITE/LAST.
It will recreate your reply which you can edit to your heart's delight.
If you make a mistake in the title of your reply (or topic). Simply
type SET NOTE /TITLE="new title"
|
97.10 | FYI | UPWARD::HEISER | welcome to the TONE ZONE | Fri Feb 22 1991 12:01 | 110 |
| From: [email protected] (Nigel Allen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: SaudiNet: Sending Email to Servicemembers
Date: 21 Feb 91 05:17:00 GMT
Sender: [email protected]
Organization: 52 Manchester Avenue
Volkhart Baumgaertner asked about getting e-mail to U.S. troops in the
Gulf. This message from [email protected] (Ken McVay) should help.
Newsgroups: can.general,bc.general
Subject: SaudiNet: Sending mail to servicemembers in the Gulf
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 19 Feb 91 08:25:18 GMT
Distribution: can
Organization: 1B Systems Management Limited
The Saudi Connection
Guidelines
The Saudi Connection is copyright 1990 by Mark Niwonger. It is a
private net which 1B Systems Management Limited has accessed by
accepting the terms and limitations imposed upon all member systems
within SaudiNet. It is not available on any network backbone.
Users are not permitted to read messages posted to SaudiNet, since
they are of a private nature, but those wishing to show support for
servicemen in the Gulf area are encouraged to contact them.
There are NO guarantees that any message will be delivered to Saudi
Arabia. Every effort will be made to do so however. At this time
approximately 98% of all messages entered in the SAUDI group are
being delivered to Saudi Arabia. The ones not being delivered
are due to address errors. All properly address letters are being
delivered to the Military Post Office in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
1B Systems Management accepts no legal responsibility for messages
posted to the net, but will do it's best to see to it that they
are delivered to the SaudiNet distribution centre in the United
States within 48 hours of their receipt here.
All outbound messages are censored at the distribution site at the
request of the United States Department of Defense, and racial slurs,
incitement to war, etc. will be removed from messages prior to delivery
to Saudi Arabia. SaudiNet reserves the right to reject inappropriate
messages without explanation, should they be outside the operating
guidelines set by the Department of Defense.
Address your messages to: [email protected]
Message text entered must be in the following format:
<for specific individual> <for any serviceman>
LOCAL FORCES LOCAL FORCES
{receipients name}{receipients SSN} Any Servicemember
{receipients Unit}DEPLOYED Operation Desert Storm
[APO/FPO] New York, NY {Zip Code} APO New York 09848-0006
NOTE: If you know the recipients' Zip Code *use* it
otherwise use the generic Zip Code for the US
Military Post Office. For service personnel
stationed on ships in the Gulf, use FPO
NY, NY 03866-0006. For 2nd. Marine Division,
use FPO NY NY 09502-0204.
{Body of Letter (ie, the message)}
Are these messages censored?
Yes, they are censored by SaudiNet originators for such things as:
racial slurs, profanity, incitation to war and obvious things of that
nature. This is at the direction of the Department of Defense of the
United States. (Regulations from the Canadian military, when provided,
will also be adhered to.)
Will there be two-way mail?
Eventually there will be. At this time there is not but we are
working on it. We are in the process of sending volunteers to Saudi
Arabia to set up receiving staations. We are working directly with
the US Command Central, specifically through Lt. General James
Cassitty and his staff.
What's in it for me?
The feeling that comes from doing a nice thing for someone.
Is there any charge for sending a message?
No - SaudiNet is a public service offered by bulletin board operators
throughout the world. 1B Systems Management Limited delivers messages
originating here without charge.
We have contacted the Canadian military, and our local MP, with regard
to establishing liaison between the American mail depot in Saudi
Arabia and Canadian forces serving in Qatar and elsewhere. If you have
Canadian FPO addressing information, use it in the format shown above,
and we will do our best to deliver it for you. When we have received
word from the military, we will advise everyone via a post in
can.general.
Adopt a Marine Pen-Pal today! Send your mail| ANY MARINE
via [email protected], and use the | H&S Co.Maint.Plt.2nd. LAI Btn.
address on the right to reach our 'adopted' | (Deployed)
unit. (Email me for instructions reaching others)| FPO NY NY 09502-0204
|
97.11 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Surrender Dorothy and Saddam | Wed Feb 27 1991 11:49 | 19 |
|
The Worcester (MA) Auditorium has a card show this weekend with guests
Dick "Night Train" Lane, Paul Warfield, Billy Herman, Enos Slaughter,
Bob Feller, Otto Graham, and Johnny Unitas. (401) 826-2419 for times
and details.
Heard this morning that Johnny U. has filed for bankrupcy. Too bad.
In other news, ACC officials are reviewing an alleged altercation
between two sprinters on the award stand at the league's indoor
championship meet.
Kevin Braunskill of NC allegedly hit James Trapp of Clemson in the head
with the championship trophy he won for taking the 200-meter dash.
Trapp finished third. Trapp suffered a mild concussion and required
three stitches.
Dickstah
|
97.12 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Wed Feb 27 1991 12:03 | 7 |
| TTom,
Better get over here in this note....
What's with the ACC anyway???
Cap :-) :-)
|
97.13 | | CAM::WAY | When Nick returns: Mother of all Parties | Wed Feb 27 1991 12:08 | 8 |
| Wow,
Too bad about Johnny Unitas. I saw on HBO's Inside the NFL that
he was a successful marketing manager for a firm in Baltimore.
Could that report concern him or his firm?
'Saw
|
97.14 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Feb 27 1991 12:32 | 5 |
| What I read is that the City of Baltimore is reneging on a promise to
pay off a loan or forgive a loan or some such nonsense, so Johnny U has
turned around and declared bankruptcy.
John
|
97.15 | | REFINE::ASHE | Everybody here is equally kind... | Wed Feb 27 1991 12:46 | 3 |
| Dickster,
Is it both days? Know which days the guests will be there?
|
97.16 | Johnny U not from ACC | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:00 | 10 |
| One of Johnny U's latest business ventures was to put his name on a
betting service. Call up his 900 number and he'll tell you which way to
bet. As soon as he did this, a lot of other business ventures immediately
went sour. It precluded any workings with the NFL. Maybe Baltimore's
actions followed this.
RE: ACC. No Carolina hitting/being_hit_by Clemson. Somebody better
investigate soon, assuming some one gives a rats ass...
TTom
|
97.17 | Whatever happened to Babe Parilli? | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Surrender Dorothy and Saddam | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:28 | 15 |
|
Walt,
Saturday
11-2 Night Train
12-3 Warfield
1-4 Herman
4-7 Johnny U
Sunday
11-2 Train
12-3 Enos
11-2 Feller (time could be a misprint)
1:30-4:30 Otto
|
97.18 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Surrender Dorothy and Saddam | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:34 | 8 |
|
Oh, and another item from the sports page: Crystal Topps (72-24-36)
is appearing next Monday at the Fuzzy Grape in Webster, MA.
For safety's sake, I'd avoid the first few rows if I were you.
Dickstah
|
97.19 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Feb 27 1991 14:51 | 6 |
| Dick "Night Train" Lane was one of my favorite players back then. He,
and Leon Hart were some pretty tough characters on the field.
You'd never know I was a Lions fan back in the 50's, huh.
Lee
|
97.20 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I was testing the bounds of reality | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:00 | 14 |
|
> You'd never know I was a Lions fan back in the 50's, huh.
Sure we would Lee. Just have to add your love of the Tigers and a
certain statistically figure together...
;^)
John U. with a gambling service hahahaa what a joke. I have a few friends
who used to get tips from Johnny (he was good friends with the owner of
a bar where they worked) and from what they tell me, Johhny had a track
record that compared to Elway and Tarkington's superbowl records combined..
mike
|
97.21 | (8^)* (^) (^) | ECAMV3::JACOB | Iraqi Tanks=1 spd fwd, 6 spd reverse | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:56 | 5 |
| re.18 I could think of many worse ways to die!!!
JaKe
|
97.22 | FYI | UPWARD::HEISER | welcome to the TONE ZONE | Wed Feb 27 1991 16:06 | 61 |
| Subj: faster mail to our troops........
Subj: email to troops from Digital
An Internet address has been established to route personal messages to U.S.
military personnel involved in Operation Desert Storm and can be addressed
from within Digital.
Since there is presently no known direct Internet route to
Saudi Arabia, these messages will be uploaded to the Saudi Connection,
a BBS network. Traffic on the Saudi Connection ends up with a sysop in
Saudi Arabia who prints the messages on a laser printer and delivers
them to the U.S. military postal system there.
Although the routing is very complex, these messages are now
being delivered to the addressee in Saudi Arabia in less than a week.
In comparison, there have been reports that snail-mail is taking six
to ten weeks.
While the contents of these messages are not available for
public viewing, they are also not private. One or more sysops in the
system will censor the messages for racial slurs, profanity and
obvious things of that nature. The Saudi Connection is a private
endeavor and those involved in it feel strongly that it should only be
used to send "positive" messages. No message will be passed which
might adversely affect the morale of the recipient.
This is presently a one-way deal. No system has been
established for return mail, so be sure to include your snail-mail
address, especially if you are writing to ANY SERVICEPERSON.
To send a message via Vax Mail, using the following addressing ...
To: nm%decwrl::"[email protected]"
(You SHOULD use NMAIL, as DECWRL is often very busy and sometimes not
available. To do so, put nm% in front of decwrl.)
Include the serviceperson's name and address in the body of
your message as shown below:
Specific Individuals:
Name, Rank, Social Security Number
Operation Desert Shield
Organization/Unit (Deployed)
APO NY ZIPCode
Local Forces <----THIS MUST BE INCLUDED OR IT WILL GET SENT
TO NEW YORK AND THEN BACK TO SAUDI!!!!!
Any Serviceperson:
Any Servicemember
Operation Desert Shield
APO New York 09848-0006
Local Forces <----THIS MUST BE INCLUDED OR IT WILL GET SENT
TO NEW YORK AND THEN BACK TO SAUDI!!!!!
It is important that you put "Local Forces" as the last line
of the address. If you don't, it will take a very long time,
indeed, to reach the addressee.
Please try to limit messages to 20 lines.
|
97.23 | | CAM::WAY | When Nick returns: Mother of all Parties | Wed Feb 27 1991 16:43 | 11 |
| I'll have to try that with Nick.
While it could be a while since I'd hear back from him, I might hear
in a regular letter (although he's so far into Iraq ANY mail might
take a while to get there).
I'll let you know how it all goes!
Oooh-Rah!
'Saw
|
97.24 | How about it? | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Mon Mar 04 1991 18:13 | 7 |
| Question...
Is someone going to do the NCAA 5 man team pick'em contest? You
know like we did last year where you pick 5 players and what they score
is what you earn. I thought that was alot of fun.
B.A.
|
97.25 | 8 players | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Mon Mar 04 1991 19:27 | 5 |
| woops...
Guess it was 8 players instead of 5...
B.A.
|
97.27 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Mar 05 1991 10:48 | 3 |
| second
|
97.28 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 05 1991 11:52 | 2 |
| Let's not forget where we are working. We are at DEC where those who
propose get immediatel responsibilty for the project!
|
97.29 | | CAM::WAY | Gonna tell Aunt Mary 'bout Uncle John | Tue Mar 05 1991 12:08 | 5 |
| Here, here!
Mac's right. All you proposers make up the contest, eh?
8^)
|
97.31 | | SACT41::ROSS | Some people call me Maurice...whoowoo | Tue Mar 05 1991 12:47 | 34 |
| I will run the NCAA scoring tournament on two conditions:
1) Everybody SENDS me their entry, so we all don't have to wade thru
a bunch of notes.
2) Every entry conforms to the following format:
------ cut here --------------------------------------------------------------
Your name: Doug Ross VAXmail address: DUGROS::ROSS
Player Name Team
----------- ----
King Rice North Carolina
Henrik Rodl North Carolina
Eric Montross North Carolina
Brian Kelly Georgetown
Eric Riley Purdue
Kenny Anderson Georgia Tech
Shawn Bradley BYU
Damon Bailey Indiana
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.S. I don't remember if there were lineup requirements regarding positions,
I'd rather not have to figure out who qualifies where. Just give me
eight names.
Oh yeah, to make it more interesting:
Only one player from any team {this is the Anti-UNLV loading rule}
Remember, the winner is the person whose team scores the most total
points over the course of the tournament.
|
97.32 | real positions? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Tue Mar 05 1991 12:56 | 7 |
| Hey, I liked the part of putting them into their real positions.
The only problem with that is someone has to know where everyone plays.
How's it gonna be?
TTom
|
97.33 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Mar 05 1991 13:11 | 14 |
| Seems like lasted year we had to have one person from each position as
starters.. then we could have three off the bench. I was thinking
overall it was like 1 center 3 forwards 4 guards.... and there was no
stipulation about more than one player from a team (cause lasted year I
had TWO players from UNLV, but I still didn't win!).
Meanwhile, I'm not making any picks until I find out what the regional
matchups are.
Also... I don't mind SEND-ing my picks to the Scorekeeper, but I think
it's also neat to put your picks in here... then everybody has a feel
for how everybody else is doing, and it's more fun.
Mike JN
|
97.34 | Great! | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Tue Mar 05 1991 14:38 | 8 |
|
I'm glad you guys remembered this stuff....so let me get this
straight. 8 players,but not from the same team, right? O.K. Positions
do NOT matter, right? O.K.
Send all entry's to the score keeper, right? O.K. I'm in...
B.A.
|
97.35 | A note form the originator of this contest... | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Tue Mar 05 1991 15:17 | 51 |
| Well, since I started this thing and ran the first contest, I guess I should
pipe in. Unfortunately, I don't seem to have kept the rules. And all I have
is a note from Nazz from 1988 (see below). When I started it, it was one
center, two forwards, and two guards. Don't remember the reserve scheme but I
think any three could be picked regardless of position.
Just for kicks, here are my first choices...
Troy Lewis, Purdue
Mark Macon, Temple
Rex Chapman, Kentucky
Danny Ferry, Duke
JR Reid, North Carolina
Sean Elliot, Arizona
Harvey Grant, Oklahoma
Mitch Richmond, Kansas State
<<< ASABET::RUBY1:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_88.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Byte for Byte, the best entertainment on the Net >-
================================================================================
Note 75.23 NCAA Tourney Player Points Lottery 23 of 66
DELNI::NAZZARO 27 lines 16-MAR-1988 11:47
-< Here's the format! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK - the author of this note is back! Imagine having to go to
meetings! And me having much more important things to do!
Thanks for all the input. The new format is as follows: everyone
can pick whoever they want, only restriction only one player from
each team. Then as a tiebreaker, guess the total points scored
by your selections. I like the idea of choosing a center, two
forwards, and two guards, but we'll also add three reserves.
Post your teams in here by noon Thursday. That gives you all 24
hours to choose. I'll start off with my team.
C - Danny Ferry, Duke
F - Sean Elliot, Arizona
F - Lionel Simmons, LaSalle
G - Byron Larkin, Xavier
G - Hersey Hawkins, Bardley
Reserves
Mark Macon, Temple
Gary Grant, Michigan
Jeff Greyer, Iowa State
Total points by my players: 621
NAZZ
|
97.36 | how soon they forget | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I was testing the bounds of reality | Tue Mar 05 1991 21:09 | 14 |
|
As the guy who ran it the last two years I'd be more than happy to let someone
else have the honor this year. As already stated 8 players, 3 guards, 3 forwards
and two centers all from different teams with a total points scored by your
team guess as the tiebreaker. Two years ago Jim Tracy won it and last year it
was Dan the Tan Schneider by about a bucket over 3 or 4 other guys. Last year
we did have some player posistioning bickering as half the folks in here wanted
to play Lattiner at Forward and the other half at center. Also some folks were
miffed that they couldn't play Anderson Hunt at Forward. Must be atleast 20 or
30 6'1" 190 LBs power forwards in the league...;^)
If you're going to run it I hope you got EVE or better as your Editor../..
mike
|
97.37 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Tue Mar 05 1991 22:39 | 4 |
| I've got a pretty good list somewhere of positions. Perhaps I'll post it one
of these days soon and we can just take it as gospel.
j.
|
97.38 | | CAM::WAY | Gonna tell Aunt Mary 'bout Uncle John | Wed Mar 06 1991 08:28 | 8 |
| >I've got a pretty good list somewhere of positions. Perhaps I'll post it one
>of these days soon and we can just take it as gospel.
Sorry, Jeff, but someone beat you to it. It's called the Kama Sutra and
it is Gospel ;^)
Saw
|
97.39 | | SACT41::ROSS | Some people call me Maurice...whoowoo | Wed Mar 06 1991 08:32 | 44 |
| >As already stated 8 players, 3 guards, 3 forwards
>and two centers all from different teams with a total points scored by your
>team guess as the tiebreaker. T
Okay, them's the rules.
8 players : 2 centers, 3 forwards, and 3 guards all from different
teams.
Let's get some positions cleared up now:
Mourning : F or C? I say F
Jimmy Jackson : F or G? I guess F is best
Pete Chilcutt : C or F? I say C
Eric Montross : BS-WMD {big stiff, white man's disease :-)}
>if you're going to run it I hope you got EVE or better as your Editor../..
I'm going to write up a quick RALLY application to do all the totals...
That's why I'd appreciate it if everyone used the same format. Plus, I can
then generate a report of all entries into a single note, rather than putting
them in here one at a time.
Send to DUGROS::ROSS {node 34193 if it's not in your net database}
------------------------------- cut here ----------------------
Name :
Player Team
--------------------------------------------------
C :
C :
F :
F :
F :
G :
G :
G :
--------------------------------------------------
Predicted total points scored :
|
97.40 | let's go | 33945::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Wed Mar 06 1991 09:47 | 4 |
| Sounds good. Now let's get a topic and we can post our teams. That way we
know if everyone's legal in terms of roster composition.
TTom
|
97.41 | Taxes and Beer | ANGLIN::KIRKMAN | Yeah, I get StarTrek jokes. | Fri Mar 08 1991 00:42 | 38 |
| Okay, I don't remember where the topic of taxing beer came up, so I'm
posting this note here. The discussion wasn't under the right topic
anyway.
I'm currently doing a residency at Miller Brewing Co. Yep, the High
Life people. BTW - They really do have some things good. Free soda
and donuts all day long, monthly quotas of REALLY cheap beer. To bad
VAXs aren't cheap enough to really take advantage of employee
discounts. ;-)
Anyway, the subject of taxes on beer came up. So this noon I thought
I'd get it straight from the horses mouth, and asked some the engineers
about it over lunch. Really started a conversation.
Now, all of this info it strictly round numbers, guys speaking from
memory, but:
$1.25 / case Federal Tax
$1-$3 / case State Tax depending on the state
$ .50 / case Advertizing
$1 / case Transportation
$1.50 / case Glass Bottles
You get the picture.
A couple of other tid-bits:
After brewing the beer and selling the sold remains (yeast) to
pharmisutical (sp?) companies - 12 oz. of beer cost about 1/2 cent.
Talk about extraneous expenses!!! And they are trying to re-market the
byproduct in a higher grade catigory - so brewing beer could end up
having a negitive production cost!?!
They are milling aluminmum cans so thin that the paint on the can is
the only thing keeping a sizable percentage of the cans waterproof.
The paint routinely covers pin-holes in the can.
SKK
|
97.42 | TAXachusetts!!!!! | NRADM::GALVIN | o..........|||| Candlepins | Fri Mar 08 1991 12:27 | 6 |
| Well, Massachusetts must really pump up the max for their tax. Last
night, I spent $18.19 (including $1.20 deposit) for a case of Miller
Genuine draft. 2 weeks ago, in Florida, I spent $11.99 for the same
beer. Mass. is a rip-off!
RTG
|
97.44 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Fri Mar 08 1991 14:22 | 8 |
| � <<< Note 97.41 by ANGLIN::KIRKMAN "Yeah, I get StarTrek jokes." >>>
� -< Taxes and Beer >-
Aye Coptun! I'm afrrraid the Di-lithium Crrrystals arrre degrrrading at
an alarrrming rrrate! Now wherrre did that grrreenblooded, pointy
earrred spawn of satan get hi`self to?!
Mike `Commander Scott' JN
|
97.45 | A more then one beer thirst | NRADM::GALVIN | o..........|||| Candlepins | Fri Mar 08 1991 14:44 | 9 |
| Hawk,
You are probably right about the store raising the prices. It was in
Stow. I wasn't actually looking for a deal either. When I got to the
cash register, I had to do a double take. Of course, dying for a beer
as bad as I was, price became no object. I'll have to remember to
stock up next time I'm in Nashua.
RTG
|
97.46 | My Parents still haven't figgered out the connection | ANGLIN::KIRKMAN | Yeah, I get StarTrek jokes. | Fri Mar 08 1991 18:55 | 9 |
| re: 44
With a name like SCOTT KIRKman, seems like for years that everyone I
met tried the "Beam me up, Scotty" line. Nice to know dat some things
don't change. >:-) Finally gave up and tried to enjoy it.
Commander Scott (Hmmmmm sounds kindda right)
P.S. Better impersonation than most.
|
97.47 | Bubka Break 20' ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Wed Mar 20 1991 13:39 | 9 |
| Very small item in the paper today said that Sergei Bubka, the Soviet
Union's top pole vaulter, broke the 20' mark last Saturday in a meet in
Spain and then did it again in some meet in his home town of Donetsk in
the USSR.
Anybody else have any other information ??? That's quite a feat. 20 of
'em as a matter of fact.
Bob Hunt
|
97.48 | So when's the 8-foot high jump? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 20 1991 13:46 | 13 |
|
Bubka said he raised the bar well above his winning vault the first
time for the people of the United States, because of course 20 feet
means nothing to the rest of the world. He said he knew it would
get attention here...
I hadn't heard he'd repeated the feat. Now *that's* amazing. I guess
it just shows what you can do when the pressure's off and you're in the
mental groove...
glenn
|
97.49 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | It's 25 or 6 to 4 .... | Wed Mar 20 1991 16:16 | 5 |
| Not only that, but Bubka got a $30,000 bonus for breaking the 20'
barrier.
Funny, but Glenn's right. The rest of the world is metric - I wonder if
some European group will have a bouns if he clears 7 meters ?
|
97.50 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Mar 21 1991 06:57 | 3 |
| His second jump cleared 20' 1/2".
lEe
|
97.51 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Let's go Seton Hall, SJU, UCONN! | Thu Mar 21 1991 11:06 | 10 |
| Bubka has been near the 20' mark for quite some time.
Oh, and Glenn, the high jump record is already over 8'.
Doc - not surprised Sergei got a bonus for hte world record. Look for
him to break it a few more times - by say 1/4 to 1/2 inch at a time -
and
each time collecting a bonus.
JD
|
97.52 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | Is it DECrap or De Crap??? | Thu Jun 27 1991 16:53 | 22 |
| I was listening to a sports talk show here in Pittsburgh on the radio
the other night. One of the callers was complaining about the local
newspapers not giving major coverage to the WWF and other "pro
wrasslin'" results.
The talk show host proceeded to tell the caller about how the WWf is
choreographed and outcomes of the events are known well in advance and
that it is all planned. Well, this caller acted like he had just been
shot in the ass with rock salt. The talk show host burst his bubble.
The caller couldn't believe the "set up" part about the WWF and sounded
like he was ready to cry. While the talk show host was talking, the
guy blurted out something aobut the host being a liar and said (in 5
year old style), that he didn't believe the host and then hung up on
him.
Meanwhile, I just aobut wrecked my car cause i was laughing at the
caller's reaction. HILARIOUS!!!
JaKe
|
97.53 | You mean the WWF ain't real?!?! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Jun 28 1991 08:45 | 1 |
|
|
97.54 | | CAM::WAY | Toonces, the Rugby Playing Cat.... | Fri Jun 28 1991 08:56 | 10 |
| Nope, it comes out of a bottle.
And the guy that has been dispensing that bottle is facing up to 44 years
for doing so....
Ah Testosterone.... the juice that wrecked a thousand careers.....
'Saw
|
97.55 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Slam dances with slugs...YUCK! | Fri Jun 28 1991 10:34 | 19 |
|
I'm not into wrasslin', but I was appalled shocked to find out that my
wife is a closet WWF fan.
It started when I found the cancelled check made out by her to the WWF
and marked 'donation'. Next thing I know there's all this WWF
literature coming to the house featuring stuff like "The Life of the
Bengal Tiger." Now I said I don't follow wrasslin', but I figure the
"Bengal Tiger" is just another stiff on steroids like the "Junkyard
Dog."
Then because it's the *World* Wrestling Federation, she got this
sticker of the Globe with the big letters WWF under it stuck on her car
window.
How embarrassing.
Dickstah
|
97.56 | | CAM::WAY | Toonces, the Rugby Playing Cat.... | Fri Jun 28 1991 10:54 | 10 |
| JEEEE-- ZUSS, Dickstah!
Nexted thing you know, you'll be tellin us she suffers from Candlepin Madness!
I mean, I know she's a Redskins fan...that's tough enough to bear, but
now a closet WWF fan????? You best be lookin' out when they're givin'
the steroids to those tigers.....
'Saw
|
97.57 | Don't recall a wrasseler called Bengal! | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Fri Jun 28 1991 11:26 | 10 |
|
The life of thr Bengal tiger?????
R u sure that she didn't donate money to the Wild LIFE Federation?
Or was it the Wild WIFE Federation, we have heard stories u know!!
8^)
Steve
|
97.59 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Jun 28 1991 12:13 | 4 |
| That's the *Wallace* Civic Center Hawk. And REK 'rassled there
once as the Masked Marvel.
/Don
|
97.60 | | CAM::WAY | Toonces, the Rugby Playing Cat.... | Fri Jun 28 1991 12:29 | 28 |
| I went to wrasslin' once in Hartford when Hulk Hogan and Randy Macho Man
Savage were running their series of Title Bouts. You could tell that if
there weren't NO TV cameras, the title weren't gonna change hands....
Anyway, that ticket was free, and I had a good time, even though the
section of the Hartford Civic Center I was sitting in was the "English as
a Second Language Only" section 8^)
I went a second time with a date who really liked wrasslin.... Anyway, it
turns out that like Hawk, the two of us got a bigger kick out of watchin
the True Believers in the crowd than we did watchin' the wrasslin....
QUESTION:
Whats the difference between a WWF Match and an old time
revival meetin'?
ANSWER:
Nobody is rolling on the floor and speaking in tongues at the WWF
match....
I think I saw REK once on wrasslin' on TV when I was in FRANCE. But
I've heard since that he's off steroids, his hair is growing back in,
and his teeth are better 8^)
'Saw
|
97.61 | Where's Bruno, the "living legend".... | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Jun 28 1991 13:30 | 15 |
|
My brother-in-law happens to live real close to the old
"Executioner." In fact he has struck up a decent friendship with him
and hopes to be invited to one of his Thanksgiving Day parties that
involves all the heavies from the WWF. So far, he's got the chance to
meet a few of the guys...maybe he'll ask me over too!!
What ever happened to "Jumpin Johnny DeFasio"(sp)? Used to love
"Chilly Billy Cardilly" doing the play-by-play back in the Steel City.
Which reminds me, bring back Chiller Theater!!!!
bill..g.
|
97.62 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Jelly Roll Morton | Fri Jun 28 1991 14:12 | 8 |
| REK always reminds me of Pete Dohery, The Duke Of Dorchester. Spitting
Image..
I went to a few matches at the Gahden. Great fun. Saw REK, aka The
Duke, actually win a match.
JD
|
97.63 | | CAM::WAY | Toonces, the Rugby Playing Cat.... | Fri Jun 28 1991 14:34 | 1 |
| In case you missed it, Jim McMahon got traded (sometime or other).....
|
97.64 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Since 1st I had, Worst I had Was Good | Fri Jun 28 1991 20:13 | 10 |
| re bill g
"Chilly Billy" Cardille is now the weekend weather guy on channel 11 in
Pittsburgh. He aslo does some kind of radio show on one of those
stations that at any one time, only two people are listening to, and
one of those is on "scan".
JaKe
|
97.65 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Sat Jun 29 1991 11:34 | 9 |
|
Thanks Jake.. Chilly Billy WAS hip..
Now the $1,000,000 question. Where's Paul Shannon these days?
Adventure Time was a real highlight of my childhood. Those appearances
of the 3 Stooges, and good old Nosmo King were simply to much!!
bill..g.
|
97.66 | Colorado Trail Foundation info? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Saint Frank and the Magic Cow | Mon Jul 01 1991 13:57 | 9 |
| Does anyone out there in SPORTS note land know how I can get in touch
with a group called the Colorado Trail Foundation? It's based somewhere
out there. They're developing a trail somewhat like the eastern
Appalachian Trail.
A phone number and/or a_address would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
TTom
|
97.67 | Paul Bought it from Lung Cancer | ECAMV3::JACOB | Since 1st I had, Worst I had Was GOOD! | Mon Jul 01 1991 17:12 | 15 |
|
>> Now the $1,000,000 question. Where's Paul Shannon these days?
>>Adventure Time was a real highlight of my childhood. Those appearances
>>of the 3 Stooges, and good old Nosmo King were simply to much!!
>> bill..g.
Bill
Paul Shannon went to the big "Adventure Time" in the sky about a year
and a half ago. He's with Curly and Moe and Larry now.
JaKe
|
97.68 | | FDCV06::KING | If the shoe fits... BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!! | Mon Jul 08 1991 13:33 | 7 |
| I go on vacation and my poor name gets dragged through the mud...
WWF DO you know whatvthat really stands for????
Wacky Waste Follies !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111
REK
|
97.69 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Mon Jul 15 1991 09:07 | 3 |
| Anyone know the wherabouts of Wil Mcdonough? His Sat. and Sun.
columns have been missing from The Glob for a few weeks now.
Denny
|
97.70 | | HAVASU::HEISER | everyone's got a seed to sow | Mon Jul 15 1991 16:05 | 1 |
| he got tapped on the shoulder
|
97.71 | He writes for Digital Today | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Thu Jul 18 1991 10:50 | 4 |
| I heard he rushed out to the Left Coast to try and win the rights t
write Alzado's memoirs. after all it takes one a##hole to understand
another a##hole. JMO
|
97.72 | FYI | HAVASU::HEISER | SPORTS = electronic Cheers | Thu Aug 01 1991 12:14 | 6 |
| Re: 1.14
I don't know what your manglers have done, but keep it up! The
response today is the best its been (for me) since you've been host.
Mike
|
97.73 | | CAM::WAY | High-Toned Son of a Bitch | Thu Aug 01 1991 12:26 | 14 |
| Well, I know a while ago we actually replaced a node in the CAM cluster,
with a faster node.
My guess however, is that the net problem up in Western Mass finally got
cleared up.
As I've mentioned before, we're kind of in a little backwater tributary
on the net, and you need a couple of extra hops to get here. (Nothin'
like bein' all hopped up, right?)
Glad to hear the response time is good (knock on wood)....
'Saw
|
97.74 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Say it ain't so Pee Wee ! | Mon Aug 12 1991 10:42 | 3 |
| The response has been an improvemnt for me too. Thanks, Saw !
Doc
|
97.75 | | CAM::WAY | Call her up on the spank line | Mon Aug 12 1991 10:55 | 13 |
| Well, I didn't do anything 8^)
Seriously, if anyone is experiencing performance problems (with CAM and
SPORTS I mean ;^)) then chances are it's the network.
When we first moved here from Enfield, our net was set up kind of
screwy. I believe we have to make 2 hops before we're on a main line
of the net, and a lot of other place don't have to do that...
As always, if you have any problems, let me know...
later,
'Saw
|
97.76 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Meghan rolls over, film at 11 | Mon Aug 12 1991 11:20 | 5 |
| Response was pretty slow for me latter part of last week, but seems OK
today...
py
|
97.77 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Need one of those endolphin rushes | Mon Aug 12 1991 13:56 | 13 |
|
'saw's right, he had nothing to do with the improved response time.
I've been busy lately, and hadn't gotten into the notesfile. When I
got in today, I saw the complaints about the response time, donned by
moderator's beany, and did some massive network tuning. Found the bug
myself, it was in the bi-valve cuspid NFT address access blocks. I
implemented a radial serial protocolusing an object oriented structure
reference and symbolic address synchronizers. It seened to have truned
the trick.
If anyone has any questions, just call.
Bruce
|
97.78 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Older today and damned proud of it | Mon Aug 12 1991 14:04 | 10 |
| re.77
Bruce,
Is that another way of saying you powered it off and back on?????
(8^)*
JaKe
|
97.79 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Need one of those endolphin rushes | Mon Aug 12 1991 15:43 | 5 |
|
Whatever I did sure screwed up my spelling. I thought "err" Brooks got
into my account for a minute.
Bruce
|
97.80 | Hey Bruce is that Cuspid NFT a Phase V thingie ! | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Tue Aug 13 1991 13:55 | 0 |
97.81 | zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | AKOV06::DCARR | TheySayI'mCrazy,ButIHaveAAWESOMETime... | Tue Aug 13 1991 14:46 | 19 |
| Response time has been absolutely HORRIBLE today... I haven't been
in a over a week, but catching up has been painful -
Shoot, I cleaned up my entire office, ate lunch, cleaned out my
briefcase (and if you knew what a slob I am, you'd realize how long I'm
talking about ;-), duplicated all the phone numbers in my little black
book, and wrote 5 checks! (Its taken over two hours to read probably
fewer than 100 notes)
This buffer window took at least two minutes to appear, and wait times
of up to 5 minutes between notes has been common as I nexted unseen
all over the place...
I work in Acton, MA, so I wonder why its taking so long - hayle, I kin
get to a conference in Japan faster than this one!
Just thought you'd like to know,
ML
|
97.82 | | CAM::WAY | Call her up on the spank line | Tue Aug 13 1991 15:05 | 10 |
| So do me, ML
(by the time he reads this I'll have a three state head start ;^))
Sorry, don't know what the problem could be. There might be some
documentation builds on CAM today or something....
'Saw
|
97.83 | my $.02 to ML too :*( | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Tue Aug 13 1991 15:06 | 9 |
| I think it was yest'day some weenie (;^) claimed to have done a
technoidee thang to speed up the network.
Mebbe somebody could do a "off-on" thingie again?
pretty s l o w t o d a y .......
Kev
|
97.84 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Need one of those endolphin rushes | Wed Aug 14 1991 17:11 | 13 |
|
Sorry guys, I screwing around with some legal folks over getting some
ppreannounced disk drives shipped to my customer. I did the salesman
thingy to them (the L word) and told them I could get them here this
week. It looks like it could happen. Don't have time to put on my
network guru beany, especially if the problem might be on CAM. Frank,
you guys need me to come in and do some tuning?
Bruce
P.S. No Jeff, I implemented DECnet PHase II�, the smell of beer. What it
does is get Hawk all riled up and he transefers all these packets in
his car between sites real fast.
|
97.86 | Useless fact of the day | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Wed Oct 16 1991 15:50 | 7 |
| FWIW, George "Norm" Wendt is 43 today.
JaKe
|
97.87 | what's he on Slimfast? 8^), 8^) | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Wed Oct 16 1991 15:54 | 1 |
|
|
97.88 | Reds in civil rights suit | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Wed Oct 16 1991 20:34 | 51 |
| Article 1324 of clari.news.religion:
From: [email protected] (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.baseball,clari.news.religion,clari.news.law.civil,clari.news.interest.people,clari.sports.top
Subject: Cincinnati Reds sued over Bible sign
Date: 16 Oct 91 18:53:59 GMT
Priority: major
An evangelist filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday claiming his free
speech rights were violated during a 1990 World Series game at
Cincinnati's Riverfront Stadium because security guards prevented him
from displaying a Bible sign.
The suit was filed by the Rev. Guy Aubrey of Cleveland, Tenn., in U.
S. District Court in Cincinnati with the help of attorneys from the
Charlottesville, Va., based Rutherford Institute. The institute, a
conservative counterpoint to the ACLU, specializes in religious freedom
issues.
The 33-year-old minister was on his way to his seat in the stadiuim,
holding a sign that read, ``John 3:16,'' when a Burns Security guard
stopped him.
Aubrey claims the guard grabbed him by the jersey and said: ``I'm
taking you to police headquarters. Your sign is against the rules of
Major League Baseball and the Cincinnati Reds, and you can't have it in
the stadium.''
The lawsuit says security guards, backed by city police, threatened
to throw Aubrey out of the stadium unless he relinquished his sign,
which he did under protest. The incident occurred during Game Two of
last year's World Series.
Aubrey argues in his lawsuit that the stadium is a ``public forum''
where diverse messages are allowed, and officials may not single out a
particular sign simply because it is religious.
Named as defendants were the city of Cincinnati, the Cincinnati Reds
and Burns International Security Services, which provided security at
Riverfront Stadium during the 1990 World Series.
``Fans don't shed their First Amendment rights at the stadium door,''
said Rutherford Institute attorney James Knicely of Williamsburg, Va.,
who heads a team of four lawyers defending Aubrey.
``A stadium is public property, and constitutional rights prevail
there just as they do in other public places.''
The Rutherford Institute will be monitoring the 1991 World Series for
similar incidents of religious discrimination, Knicely said.
In 1989, Knicely settled a similar case brought by the Rutherford
Institute against officials at RFK Stadium in Washington. That case was
brought on behalf of two men whose Bible signs were confiscated during
NFL games in 1984.
In the settlement, stadium officials recognized the men's right to
display religious signs and agreed to pay legal fees. Also, CBS Sports
apologized in writing for its role in tearing down one man's ``John
3:16'' banner.
|
97.89 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Thu Oct 17 1991 10:42 | 5 |
| Giants Stadium did the same thing to our "Hoffa Knows End Zones"
sign two years ago! I'm calling Bucky B. right now and we're getting
a lawyer!
/Don
|
97.90 | banning banners should be banned | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Thu Oct 17 1991 10:50 | 12 |
| I can see a couple of sides of this.
In terms of rights, I think the guy has the right to advertise or promote
whatever he wants. Free speech and all that. I also subscribe to his
right to flash his ideas on TV.
However, I do have a concern about his obstucting the view of others
who've also paid to watch the game. I'm not familiar with this case but
you see a lot of people with these signs that stand up and block others
view and generally impede their rights to enjoy the game.
TTom
|
97.91 | Not the place for unrelated "ads" | GEMVAX::HILL | | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:53 | 24 |
| Censorship is always a dangerous issue. Where do you draw the line? One
could argue about obscene messages, but a banner proclaiming "[visiting
team] SUCKS!" Would probably get confiscated, yet this expression has
made inroads on all levels of the American mainstream.
We always hear stories of fans with anti-management banners being harassed
by the Goon Squad. Didn't the Padres' GM get in a bunch of trouble
(can't remember if he got fired or not) for giving the finger to fans
with an uncomplimentary banner a few years ago?
Personally, I think these "John 3:16" and "Jesus Saves" people only go
to these events to reach a wide audience with their message, not
because they are genuine fans. It pissess me off that these people get
the tickets, instead of REAL fans. Proof of this is at the soccer World Cup
last year in Italy. The guy with the big mulit-colored afro was there
with his John 3:16 sign. I doubt a lot of people in the stadium had a
clue what he was talking about. At least if it said GIOVANNI 3:16, some
of the locals would have known. Yes, it would annoy the hell out of me
if he was infront of me, blocking my view. Let 'em buy a bill board if
they want to get their message out. Free speech is fine, but if it has
nothing to do with the event, leave your sign home. Next thing you'll
see is political signs if you let this slide...
Tom
|
97.92 | fwiw | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:53 | 6 |
| I pretty much agree. I've heard that this is an organized group of
people that do this, not just anybody off the street. Maybe that's how
they get all the good tickets. They've also been doing this for at
least a decade.
Mike
|
97.93 | a difference | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Thu Oct 17 1991 13:45 | 8 |
| If it's OK to publicly "advertise" religion or religous belief, I guess
it's OK to publicy "advertise" against religion or religious belief. I
doubt if this same group would take up this cause. If they wouldn't it
makes them distinctly different than ACLU.
Just a thought.
TTom
|
97.94 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Avery ROOLZ | Thu Oct 17 1991 14:42 | 9 |
| Let this group, no doubt well financed, buy some air time and advertise
their views.
If the TV camera's simply stayed away from showing *all* banners during
events, then these groups would stop doing it.
"Jesus Saves!.....But Esposito Scores on the Rebound!"
JD
|
97.95 | Mention networks and your banner is shown | GEMVAX::HILL | | Thu Oct 17 1991 15:46 | 17 |
| This group HAS to be well financed/connected just to get those kinds of
tickets to every top sporting event.
The problem with the cameras staying away from ALL banners is that the
best way to get on TV is to mention the network or TV station,
especially if it's a clever acronym. The networks love to toot their
own horns and show that "the people" "love" a huge mega corporation,
when in fact, all these people love is the chance to be on TV.
Absolutely correct a few back about this group not supporting free
speech if it comes to anti-religious messages at sports events. Say
what you want about the ACLU, but they at least recognized that, as
much as it pained them from a_ideological viewpoint, they HAD to
support rights of Skinhead/Neo-Nazi/KKK/Jesse Helms to express their
views.
Tom
|
97.96 | On The Box | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football,Feel The Thunder | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:06 | 12 |
|
I whole heartedly agree..... I really get fed up with this kind of
crap!!! There are groups and organizations throught the contry and the
world that make these guys pale by compairision. The problem here is
that only the fanatics will get out and do these things. It's just
like the Thomas nomination thing.... If you listen to the poles 93%
of the black population supported his confirmation.... Well let me
tell you what... not one of my minority friends thought it was good
for the contry or their progress in equal rights. I say ban anything
that dosen't have to do with the event and let the rest pound sand !
Big Game
|
97.97 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Fri Oct 18 1991 09:41 | 35 |
| Last year, after the big Ronnie Francis trade to Pittsburgh, when
Hartford fans were vehemently down on Richard Gordon and EJ,
Pittsburgh came into the Civic Center to play a game. My brother went.
Tons of people brought banners. The Civic Center folks, on
orders of Whalers management were not allowing any banners, other than
the stupid little slogans the Booster Clob puts up.
My brother said that more than half the crowd was wearing Pittsburgh
jersies, most with Francis' number and name. Never one did the TV
cameras pan the crowd, which was a first for that season....
Regarding censorship and views etc, a couple of replies back.
Yes, the ACLU seems to be cognizant of the fact that free speech really
applies to all individuals in the country regardless of the message.
Other places puport to support these types of things, yet they fail
miserably if the message isn't one they want to hear.
As an aside, I've long wondered, what with our Valuing Differences
policy and all, just how long a note written by a Neo-Nazi,KKK,White
Supremicist employee would allowed to sit unhidden, before nuclear
war started from personnel. (Personally, I abhor the message from
those types of people, yet I would defend their right to say it)
And finally, as to the John 3:16 sign thing.... I suppose they have
a right to display their sign -- until displaying it interferes with
someone else's right to see the game....
Heavy issues though,
'Saw
|
97.98 | ~/~ | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis Today? | Fri Oct 18 1991 17:11 | 11 |
| Anybody think they could get a message through to the
placard folks with a resuest to change their suggested reading
list????
I'm getting tire of the same ol' John 3:18 chapter!
;^)
|
97.99 | I Hate This Stuff !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football,Feel The Thunder | Fri Oct 18 1991 18:20 | 14 |
|
Religious fanaticism is one of the most dangerous things in
the world today...... Fanaticism in general tends to have
bad effects on society no matter what form it rakes, religious
or otherwise. Don't get me wrong, I don't think these groups
are fanatical by any stretch of the imagination but they do
represent a movement in that direction by american society.
I think the `Saw is wrong when he says "Heavey Issue's". I
think SCARY is more like it !! censorship is not a good
thing, in fact it's very bad but fanaticism is worse. Especially
that of the religious type..... Just ask the poor people of the
middle eastern nations and for that matter Ireland as well.
Big Game
|
97.100 | Not the right venue for the message | GEMVAX::HILL | | Mon Oct 21 1991 11:25 | 28 |
| re .99
Agreed, but to "censor" people from bringing religious messages from
sporting events is not much different from the mods in here "censoring"
us toward keeping the conversation sports-related. Religious messages
are fine, but they have no bearing on the game at hand. If people want
to have banners for players, teams, in the game, etc. fine, but getting
the "word" out to the masses at a ball game that they should read the
bible is totally inappropriate.
Suppose the AmerIndian group had enough money and power to buy a huge
block of tickets for the World Series and placed banners all over the
park carrying their message. I think a lot of people would say (at
the very best) "I can see their point, but this isn't the place. Watch
the game, or if you have no interest, let a real fan go in your place"
Next thing you know, you'll see political messages...
Speaking of religous zealots....
What do you get when you cross a Jehovah's Witness with a Biker?
Someone who knocks on your door and tells you to F*&% Off!
Couldn't resist
Tom
|
97.101 | | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Mon Oct 21 1991 12:24 | 6 |
| Re: fanaticism
I think every form of that extreme is dangerous, even sports fanatics.
The soccer tragedies in Europe are a prime example.
Mike
|
97.102 | Does that include Dean Worship?? ;*) | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis Today? | Mon Oct 21 1991 12:37 | 1 |
|
|
97.103 | Dean Worship ??? I don't get it ! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Mon Oct 21 1991 17:42 | 6 |
| I wonder.... What is the policy in Denver around Banners..????
I've been to many games and watch almost everyone on the Tele and
really can't recall seeing the John:316 garbage in the stands.
Oh well...
Big Game
|
97.104 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Ever meet a weak Ape? | Mon Oct 21 1991 17:45 | 6 |
|
That's because 316 was Elway's SAT scores combined.....
Management confiscates all signs so as not to hurt the Biff...
mike
|
97.105 | John's Back !!! Donks Go To Superbowl ! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Mon Oct 21 1991 18:23 | 7 |
| Boy.... You're on a roll aren't you Mikey...... Guess
it takes a `9er victory over the most over rated team in the
NFL to get you pumped up !!! Elway played well yesterday
and I don't know of another QB in the league that couls have thrown
that ball to Jackson.
Big Game
|
97.106 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Ever meet a weak Ape? | Mon Oct 21 1991 18:32 | 6 |
|
The sorry part about that pass was/is how many times is Marty going to let
Biff beat him with that across the field pass. Sheez I knew what was coming
the minute Biff went to his left....
stupidass defenders...
|
97.107 | Go Donks !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Mon Oct 21 1991 18:37 | 7 |
| Biff Is God !!!!
God Is Great !!!!
;^)
Big Game
|
97.108 | fyi | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Wed Oct 23 1991 18:32 | 359 |
| [forwardings removed]
THE IRVINE EIS ADMINISTRATION GROUP
HOME-OFFICE PILOT
October 1990 - January 1991
SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND
In October 1990, the EIS Administration Group in Irvine, California
began a Pilot program enabling employees to work from home on a full-
time basis. Based on our successful experience during this four month
pilot, everyone who participated is now continuing to work from home on
a permanent basis. Because of the great interest in Home Office
Management, the Administration group wanted to share its success with a
larger audience, allowing others the opportunity to learn from this
effort.
RECOGNITION
First of all, the support and encouragement from our management
helped make all of this possible. The IS organization was also
instrumental in helping us with the logistics of communications set-up.
The Human Resources Organization encouraged us to publish this
document, followed our progress closely and provided good advice along
the way.
HOME OFFICE MANAGEMENT
Since first described by Jack Nilles in the 1970's as
Telecommuting, or working from a remote location (the employee's home
or a sattelite office of the organization) with the aid of
telecommunications tools (phone, computer, fax, etc.), both the name
and concept have undergone several changes. Our definition of Home
Office Management is consistent with Digital's corporate strategy of
H.O.M.E (Home Office Management Effectiveness) which is being
implemented internally as well as being offered to customers on a fee
basis. Home Office Management is the substitution of the employee's
dedicated cubicle or office for a personal office in the home. It
provides for appropriate resources within a company facility for any
face to face work that is necessary. An employee uses their home
office to do the kind of work that requires stretches of uninterrupted
time free of distractions, and uses space within a company facility to
do work which requires special equipment and information as well as
face to face interaction such as meetings, conferences, etc.
WHY HOME-OFFICE?
There are many good reasons why it makes sense for some people to
work from home. In our particular case, several factors triggered our
initial interest in the program. Particular among these was wanting to
contribute to the reduction of air pollution, reducing expenses, and
minimizing employee stress.
Approaching the year 2000 and living in Southern California means
looking at the workforce and the workplace in a different light.
Freeway congestion and air pollution are well-known problems that we
deal with on a daily basis. Three out of four in the Administration
group spent anywhere from 30 minutes to, in excess of, one hour each
way driving to work. By getting us off the freeways we were personally
motivated to save wear and tear on ourselves and our automobiles. We
would also make a difference in Digital's commitments to the Southern
California Air Quality Management District's (AQMD) requirements.
By consolidating our individual work-spaces to a much reduced but
functional common work-space, we would be able to off-load facility
space and save expense for Digital.
We had expectations of being able to concentrate better, be more
productive and experience less stress when working from our homes.
INITIAL CONCERNS
One of the main concerns was the potential social impact; would we
miss the personal contact with our coworkers? Would we be forgotten
because we would be less visible, and might that impact our prospects
for future advancement into other positions?
THE PARTICIPANTS
The five participants included three EIS District Administrators,
their Manager (the author) and another individual contributor, the EIS
Resource Manager, who reports to the EIS Regional Business and
Operations Planning Manager. The District Administrators process
invoicing and revenue information and provide business support to the
EIS Districts, as well as Sales Support Groups. Administrators receive
their work on a weekly basis rather than daily. This factor made the
home-office concept possible in the first place. In addition to
managing the Administration group, I also provide business support for
the Software Business System (SBS) which involves a considerable amount
of time on the telephone.
The EIS Resource Consultant works with Unit and District Managers
to ensure that all EIS employees are fully utilized. She also works
with vendors to acquire temporary consultants. Her work involves a
great deal of time on the telephone, as many of her contacts are
located all over the country.
WORKING CONDITIONS AT HOME
Most participants have set up an office in a dedicated room in
their homes where they can close the door and leave work behind them at
night. Only files, reference materials, or any information that we are
working with currently is kept in the home office. Everything else
stays at the Digital facility or is archived. Confidential trash goes
back to Digital for proper disposal. It is important to keep the same
sense of confidentiality in the home as one would in the office.
None of the participants have small children at home, although one
of the Administrators has two teen-agers. This certainly involved some
adjustments on their part to get used to having Mom at home much of the
time.
A TYPICAL HOME-OFFICE SETUP
Although, Home Office Management does not require that a computer
be in the home office, in our case a great portion of our work is done
by computer. In addition, participants have a modem, a terminal, and a
printer at home. The modem is a 2400 baud Scholar modem which, although
slow, is quite acceptable. Each participant has two telephone lines,
one for the modem and one for business calls. Standard features need to
include "Call Waiting", "Call Forwarding", and "Circular Calling" which
allows us a 30% discount on calls placed within a certain radius of the
home, (i.e. between 15-41 miles.) Distance may vary according to the
individual vendor.
In the home office environment we have found ourselves sitting for
longer periods of time than while in the office. (A testimony to the
ability to stay focused longer in this environment.) An average
kitchen chair will not do the job. It is very important to have a chair
with enough support that can also adjust to the right height and angle
for the back.
Up until now we have managed quite well without fax machines or
answer-machines. We have each found a service nearby that accommodates
our needs for making copies or sending/receiving faxes. Depending on
each situation, however, it might be worthwhile investing in an
answer-machine, rather than utilizing the "Call Forwarding" feature of
the office telephone system. A charge is incurred for any incoming
call that is forwarded, based on the distance and time for the call
being forwarded.
Book-shelves, file-cabinets and desk space all need to be
considered basid upon the individual's particular job needs. I have a
built-in L-shaped desk that accommodates both reference books,
work-space, some files, and supplies.
STARTUP COSTS
The installation of a new telephone line cost approx. $150.00 and
$36.00 for the jack. We learned that you will save $150.00 if you
install both lines at the same time. A two-line instrument can be
obtained for somewhere around $65.00.
Everyone has been very flexible and creative in setting up their
office. As a result, minimum expense has been incurred. One of the
Administrators bargained at a swap-meet and got a desk for $45.00.
Once I learned to turn the printer and terminal off, as well as
unplug the modem, as soon as I did not need them for a while, my
electricity bill only increased $5.00/month. Naturally my heating bill
went up during the winter, but that was more than offset by my savings
on clothing and gasoline expenses.
IS IT REALLY POSSIBLE TO WORK FULL-TIME FROM HOME?
We found that four days a week is about as full-time as practical.
Once a week each employee picks up mail, does filing, and participates
in meetings at the Digital facility. In this way a sense of belonging
to the Company is retained, something that is very important to us. We
all have found that our sense of belonging has not lessened. When we do
go into the office we look forward to it. Interestingly, there seems to
be a general feeling that when we do go in, we don't seem to get as
much done in comparison to working at home. The interruptions and the
spur-of-the-moment meetings that come about while in the office become
more noticeable now that we have better control of our time.
HOW HAS HOME-OFFICE CHANGED THE WAY I MANAGE?
The main difference is that the majority of the interaction that
used to take place face to face is now handled over the telephone. I do
not feel any less informed or in-touch than I was when we were all
located together. The Administrators feel the same way. We continue to
get together in the office for staff meetings, con-calls or individual
meetings three to four times a month. This allows us to catch up as
necessary. I can easily measure the amount of work and get a sense for
workload by utilizing the many system reports that are at my disposal.
One of the Administrators pointed out that any frustrations that a
manager might detect by observing an employee are not as readily seen
now. Instead, I must listen carefully when talking on the telephone to
see if I detect something other than a satisfied employee. The
employees miss the opportunity, now and then, to blow off steam to
their manager. Instead, they must reach me by phone, which at times
does not allow an immediate contact.
SUCCESS FACTORS
All of the employees that are involved in this program are
self-motivated and dedicated, and they like what they do. Furthermore,
they have all been in the position long enough allowing them to operate
quite independently. As manager(s) and employees we already had a good
relationship, with trust established, before we set out to work from
home.
The work itself is very structured and contained within a frame of
deadlines. This allows me to manage through results and not have the
need for anyone to be in plain sight and supervised at all times. The
system will tell, or the clients we support will, if we do not perform.
As previously mentioned, the support from our management and
various external groups helped make this possible. We held biweekly
Home-Office meetings during the Pilot to discuss learnings, work
through any obstacles and share the latest information regarding
telecommunications. Human Resources, Facilities, and IM&T attended. The
IS people did us a number of favors when we ran into problems with a
modem or a keyboard. They were great. Telecommunications keep us
informed of the latest developments and what various networks we might
be able to use.
CLIENT REACTION
During the Pilot we did not inform our clients that our work
location had changed. Most clients are remote anyhow, and we continued
to direct them to the voice-mail telephone number in the Digital
office. We picked up our messages frequently enough to avoid any
delays. As it turned out, no one noticed the difference. We did this
in order not to bias the clients one way or another. Once we decided
to permanantly move to a home office arrangement and announced this, we
received only one negative reaction from one Unit Manager. He was not
sure that it would be such a good idea. When informed that his
Administrator had been working from home for the prior four months, and
asked if he had noticed any difference, he indicated that he had not.
He has not experienced any problems since, either.
When new business numbers were given out so we could be reached
directly at home, some callers appeared to feel a little awkward. They
would apologize for calling us at home, as if we were were not "at
work". We matter-of-factly told them that there was no need to
apologize. On occasion, I suspected that there might have been some
cynicism there. Was there possibly some resentment that we were
working at home, but they were not? With time, however, those comments
seem to have ceased.
PARTICIPANT REACTION
Initially, only two of the participants were outright enthusiastic
about the idea of changing the working arrangement. Two were neutral
and one was quite skeptical. In order to overcome these initial
concerns participation was made completely voluntary with everyone
having the option to return to working from the office at any time.
Everyone stayed in the program, though, and all realize how much sense
it makes to do this. The group now wonders why we did not do it sooner.
We had not imagined that our jobs would be so well suited to working
from home. Once we tried it we realized how well it worked.
Overall, employees have reported reduced stress, improved sense of
well-being and a feeling of more control of their work-day. Generally
speaking, we have greater flexibility to choose when we want to be
interrupted. That allows for better concentration and enables us to be
more efficient. In certain areas I have seen tasks accomplished sooner,
which has enabled us to spend time in other areas previously neglected.
We can now take time to think and plan, not just react and fend off the
interruptions.
Overall, I believe that our quality of life has improved. I
purchased a new home a year ago, and now have two more hours in the day
to enjoy it. One of the administrators is currently having some major
remodeling done to her home. Rather than having to leave work for some
emergency, she is able to deal with that without major disruption in
her work day. Many other examples of how Home Office has positively
impacted this group readily come to mind.
SOME DO'S AND DON'TS.
It is important to make the distinction between work time and
personal time and between work life and personal life. Initially,
employees made the mistake of making that "quick call" to the East
Coast before getting dressed. The next time they looked up it might be
11:00 A.M. and they were still in their bathrobe. One employee tended
to lose track of time in the middle of the day and often neglected
taking lunch. It is much easier to lose a sense of time when those
traditional business cues are not present to remind us that we are "at
work".
Some employees found it tempting to sneak a little extra time at
the terminal after dinner or during the week-end. Others found the
regrigerator just a bit too convenient. These are other examples of
the need to create clear boundries and rituals which allow one to
consciously separate "homework" behavior from home behavior.
Unknowns.
We have not had the experience of working in this manner with a new
employee. When that time comes, I foresee a transition period, whereby
the initial training is done while in the office and then, gradually,
the new employee spends more and more time on his or her own and
working from home.
Technology.
Residential telephone lines are not capable of keeping the network
free from disturbances. There are good days and there are bad days.
Some days require dialing in to the system over and over, because of
interference on the screen sometimes causing the terminal to "freeze
up." The solution might be for the telephone company put in local
loops so that they can identify where there might be a problem. It is
not enough to have them check the wiring from the pole to the house,
though they might try to get away with doing just that. So, there is
some aggravation.
There are only so many modems that we can dial into. We encounter
busy signals, no answer, or getting dropped in the middle of a session.
When dialing back in, a busy signal is often encountered. So we do
something else and try later. If conditions are so bad, or if the
system is down, employees may go into a satellite office nearer to
their home and find a place to work for the day.
Two of the participants dial in to the system locally. The
rest of the group (3) incur toll-call charges. We are looking forward
to some improvements in this area whereby we would have local Timenet
access and would utilize 9600 baud modems. we are constantly attempting
to find ways to reduce costs and improve efficiency.
We would also benefit from having DTN access in the home. This
would allow employees the advantage of Digital's long distance rates to
reduce our expenses.
Recommendations:
There is no doubt that the benefits of Home Office Management to
the company and the employee far outweigh any drawbacks when all is
working as it should. Should performance problems occur, it may well
mean that the employee in question and the manager go back into the
office for some time until the problems have been resolved. For this
reason and for the orientation of new employees there should always be
some type of workspace available in the office; even if it involves
sharing.
|
97.109 | found this entertaining | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Tue Nov 12 1991 22:15 | 109 |
| IT'S NOT FUN AND GAMES ANYMORE...IT FIGURES
reprinted without premission from the Pittsburgh Press
Thursday 11-7-1991
By
Gene Collier
Occasionally, this column is accused of being whiny and even grim, but
only because it is occasionally whiny and even grim. We get other complaints,
too, but most of these we dismiss as legitimate concerns expressed by informed
readers with nothing better to do than help us improve the product while
expecting not so much as a thank-you in return.
Don't you hate people like that?????
Generally, though, we endeavor to serve no whine before its time.
Guess what????/ IT'S TIME!!!
It seems like here in the sports department, all our toys are broken.
They're cracking at the seams or their batteries are dead or several dozen of
their several million moving parts are missing or somebody spiiled
retro-mutagent ooze all over them. Or something.
We're supposed to be having great sinful gobs of fun over here, and
although watching and writing about games and players is still enormously
preferable to actual work, there are just some weeks when you want to name the
word processor "Lucille" and join B.B. King on the road.
Yesterday, I'm sitting in here all day and half the night, often
brushing right up against actual work, waiting for the National Hockey League's
Board of Governors to rule on the inpending sale of the Penguins. Now although
this tension might tittilate somebody on the business desk, or for that matter
anyone with even a cursory financial or business sense, it only reminds me that
all I know about the Board of Governors is that I'm bored of governors.
Bored of lawyers, agents, lawyer agents, agents for lawyers, lawyers
for agents, vice presidents, general counsels, chairmen of the boards, chief
executive officers, marketers, merchandizers, spin doctors, aftercare
coordinators, brokers, mavericks, general managers, managers in general,
arbitrators and other purveyors to be named later.
The Penguins aren't Mario and Ulfie anymore, they're Baldwin and
Belzbourg and J. Paul Martha and Spectacor II: The Heretic.
The Pirates inspire more angst in their off-season than passion in
their in-season.
The Steelers aren't nearly as depressing as Don King, but only because
nobody is.
Pitt's Panthers are clawing each other in the night.
But as they say at those great whine and cheese parties, "One whine
at a time, Muffy."
I suppose the major whine, the Coors Light CNN/USA Today Northwest
Airlines Whine of the Week has to do with money, and the extent to which money
has to permeate your consciousness to allow you to be even more conversant in
sports anymore.
Identify the following"
* $25 million for five years.
Right, the amount Bobby Bonilla will supposedly get in the free agent
market.
* $16.8 million for four years.
Right again, the Pirates' best offer.
* $31 million
Right again, the sale price of the Penguins.
*$24 million
Right again, the price Spectacor paid to lease the Civic Arena.
* $7 million
Right again, the total still-prospective Penguins owner Howard Baldwin
at one point hoped to raise by liquidating certain "assets".
You're awfully good at this.
On to the next round.
* $100 million
Right again, the amount any of several dozen women can sue Mike Tyson
for transgressions beginning with his classic righht to the buttocks.
You're unbelievable, Try this one:
* $13,415,928
Ha, you know-nothing. That's the amount in compensation somebody paid
the Cleveland Indians to play "baseball" last summer. They only lost 105
games. Very reasonable.
Even before we got to that figure, you had to admit that incessant
moneyspeak is depressing. I know money talks, but in sports it never shuts up.
For someone whose eyes glaze over at the mention of any amount more than
$100--except, of course, for mention of my own $700,000 salary--it has been
kind of a hazy week.
But, hey, it's not your problem.
In fact, let's end this on the upbeat.
Aren't you glad that Don King had the chance to clear his name this
week by categorically denying that he had ties to organized crime?? You bet. I
mean, imagine, a guy who virtually runs a sport like boxing, which stages its
biggest events in casinos in Las Vegas, Nev. and Atlantic City, NJ. tied to
organized crime.
I mean, come on people.
You talk about a witch hunt.
Boy, am I glad that's over.
JaKe
|
97.110 | Classic Line... | SHALOT::MEDVID | cute in a stupidass way | Wed Nov 13 1991 09:13 | 8 |
|
> The Steelers aren't nearly as depressing as Don King, but only because
> nobody is.
Gene Collier once again proves he should be a national columnist.
--dan'l
|
97.111 | Most Popular Sports in America | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 03 1991 12:38 | 25 |
| The Sports Marketing Group of Dallas has released the results of a
survey which lists the 114 most popular sports in America. The
interviews were supposedly conducted in over 2,060 homes located in
over 175 areas of the United States. Participants were asked to give
positive, negative or neutral opinions of 114 specific sports "of a
spectatorship and viewership nature" and the frequency of participation
in 71 sports.
I don't have the entire survey. I just read about it in an article
published in "Rugby". Here are the results cited by the article.
1. NFL Football
2. NCAA Football
3. Winter Olympics
4. Summer Olympics
5. Major League Baseball
30. Pro Wrestling
31. Tractor Pulls
66. Australian Rules Football
75. World Cup Soccer
76. Arm Wrestling
102. American Gladiators
103. Rugby
104. Fencing
114. Squash
|
97.112 | did they list Drood(tm) T__sing anywhere???? | CST17::FARLEY | DSA = Drood(tm) Supporters Anonymous | Tue Dec 03 1991 12:48 | 1 |
| So where's college BBall?
|
97.113 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 03 1991 13:06 | 4 |
| � So where's college BBall?
Like I said, that's all the info I have. The article I read didn't
reproduce the entire survey results.
|
97.114 | A true woodie raisin sport | CTHQ2::LEARY | Better than LDS | Tue Dec 03 1991 13:52 | 5 |
| Tractor pulls at #31??
Must be a whole lot a DD's droolin' out there. Cripes!
MikeL
|
97.115 | Look what happens when you can get on TV | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 03 1991 14:05 | 2 |
| Scary, ain't it Mike? Based on these results, fishing probably made
the top 10 and the lumberjack contests were probably in the top 50.
|
97.116 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Macaulay Culkin makes me puke! | Tue Dec 03 1991 14:08 | 12 |
| Mac and Mike -
It's even worse for track fans like myself. Track was something like
130th or so. Even though part of the Summer Olympics draw would have
to be considered Track and field.
I saw the whole list somewhere. Simply amazing. Auto racing = all
types - was up there. Fishing. Hunting. Water Skiing.
Tractor Pulling - 30th...that says it all.
JD
|
97.117 | Where was Hokey on the list? | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Tue Dec 03 1991 14:30 | 0 |
97.118 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Dec 03 1991 14:41 | 3 |
| Hay!1 Wares Monstr TRUX!!!1?
Denny
|
97.119 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Hulk'sPlight-ThighShudderingDelight | Tue Dec 03 1991 14:54 | 4 |
| Hey what's wrong with tractor pulls. At least the tractors
aren't on steroids.
/Don
|
97.120 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Better than LDS | Tue Dec 03 1991 15:03 | 7 |
| Yea, Slash, but the spectators are all a bunch a hemorrhoids
MikeL
|
97.121 | | JUPITR::PARTEE | It's a great day for hockey | Wed Dec 04 1991 10:03 | 7 |
|
As I recall from a rec.sport.hockey discussion, hockey was 41st!
Amazing.
Charlie
|
97.122 | Tractor pull don't go for $30/ticket, either... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 04 1991 10:45 | 11 |
|
> As I recall from a rec.sport.hockey discussion, hockey was 41st!
> Amazing.
Yeah, Charlie, but that's because the NHL's credibility (if not
hockey's) really is hovering around that of boxing, pro wrestling,
tractor pull and the like...
glenn
|
97.123 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Wed Dec 04 1991 11:53 | 5 |
| Too bad the entire list isn't shown. I was wondering whether or not
Groin Pull was ahead or behind Tractor Pull. Since Squash is last,
then Tomato musta come ahead of it.
lEe
|
97.124 | | JUPITR::PARTEE | It's a great day for hockey | Wed Dec 04 1991 13:05 | 15 |
|
NHL credibility is low, I agree. But, for me, the game itself easily
transcends the fighting, the officiating, the owners, and the
administration in the NHL. Fastest game on earth (jai alai doesn't
count; the ball moves faster, the players move slower). I don't
care about credibility when the game is on.
Plus, college hockey and highschool hockey and women's league hockey
and whatever hockey league the little 5 year olds are in that skates
before the DEC league all have complete credibility. Those games are
fun to watch too.
IMHO
Charlie
|
97.125 | Pre-holiday no-work-attitude... 'Hey, I'll read ::SPORTS! :-)" | GUESS::CARR | Merry Christmas, Homey... | Tue Dec 24 1991 13:16 | 12 |
| > <<< Note 97.82 by CAM::WAY "Call her up on the spank line" >>>
>
>So do me, ML
>
>(by the time he reads this I'll have a three state head start ;^))
You're probably right! :-)
Response is MUCH better today, thanks so much for your prompt
attention! :-)
ML
|
97.126 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Have you 'given' your quart today?? | Thu Mar 19 1992 22:07 | 171 |
| An informed public is a healthy public(or some BS like that), and in
keeping with my NEW tradition of helping people stay informed, I
thought this would be a good place to put this informative, yet
entertaining, article that was originally printed in last Sunday's
Pittsburgh Press.
INTERNAL COMBUSTION
from The Pittsburgh Press, 3-15-1992
By Marlene Parrish
Ok. wipe that smurk off your face. Though the topic of flatulence may
result in a veritable eruption of crude comments, it is a common byproduct of
eating various foods. Here are some facts on a problem that is with us from
birth until death.
Did you ever have an uncle ask you to pull his finger? The resulting
explosion is guaranteed to set off ripples of giggles from the youngsters. Say
"beans, beans, the musical fruit" and almost anybody on the street can finish
the rhyme.
Though the subject isn't one that most of us talk about, the truth is
that all of us have some gas in our intestinal tracts. You can call it gas,
bloating, or indigestion, or use the common four letter word for passing gas,
but the correct medical term is flatulence.
Flatulence may be a common complaint, but it's also a confirmation that
your digestive system is healthy. These days you can't pick up a newspaper or
magazine without reading an article about the virtues of eating more fiber.
And low-fat, high carbohydrate diets wuickly have become a key element in our
ongoing search for a healthier, longer life. But the "internal combustion"
that often accompanies these foods is enough to make even the most avid
vegetarian or carbo-loading athlete dread going out in public after eating.
Who knows how scientists measure this, but normal healthy people eating
ordinary foods release a quart or more of gas from below each day. That's
about 15 to 25 expulsions of varying magnitude. Anything over that is air
pollution. When a vulnerable person eats gaseous food, gas production can
soar.
A NORMAL CONDITION
------------------
When human beings were designed millions of years ago, there were few
confining walls, so gas wasn't the social problem it's turned out to be.
Today, the complaint of "too much gas" is one of the leading problems brought
to doctors who specialize in bowel diseases.
"Gas in the lower bowel is a normal human condition and it's never
killed anyone, but that's about the best that can be said about it," says Dr.
Robert D. Fusco, a gastroenterologist at the Sewickley Medical Association.
"Millions of people spend too much time worrying about foods they shouldn't eat
and noises they shouldn't make. Gas isn't dangerous. Its worst consequence
might be embarrassment. Everyone has intestinal gas. The newborn infant is
gasless until its first breath, after which air begins to appear progressively
down the digestive tract. Gas, like sin, is with us until death."
Where does gas come from??
"The two main sources of gas are swallowed air and gases that are
produced within the intestine," says Fusco. "Some people swallow airt when
eating or drinking. Carbonated drinks contribute, too. Most of the swallowed
air is belched. But many foods produce gas during the digestive process."
Among the most common gas generators are dried beans and peas,
broccoli, cabbage, carrots, celery, onions, apples, bananas, grapes, bran,
high-fiber cereals and, suprisingly, bland white wheat products like bagels,
pretzels and pasta.
HOW GAS IS PRODUCED
-------------------
All these foods contain cellulose and other compounds that chemists
call complex sugars. But don't think of them as sweet. They're not completely
digestable, so they go through our systems as fiber. When they reach the small
intestine, bacteria attack and ferment them, producing gas as a byproduct.
If dietary fiber is so important, couldn't we just nibble on twigs??
After all, if termites can feast on wood, why can't we?? It's all a matter of
enzymes, those body chemicals that help things happen. Termites have an enzyme
that helps them digest cellulose. Humans, unfortunately, don't. Gas is one
result.
Adds Dr. Wayne Peternel, chief of the division of gastroenterology at
Mercy Hospital: "We used to think that carbohydrates like dried beans and peas
were the major culprits. But in recent years, it's become appreciated that all
grains are poorly absorbed. Rice is the least offensive.
"Patients come to me complaining that they have gas, and they think
something is wrong. Many of them are simply embarassed. After evaluation for
the presence of any organic disease, we take a diet history. If there is no
disease present, we suggest dietary management."
there's no hard evidence, but its generally believed that people
produce more gas as they get older.
LACTOSE INTOLERANCE
-------------------
In addition to swallowed air and undigested complex sugars, people also
get gas because they have difficuylty digesting milk and milk products, a
condition that is known as lactose intolerance, says Peternel. He warns that
the effect of eating these foods is highly individual, so don't assume that
someone else's reaction will be yours. Gas may be more of a problem for people
who eat beans infrequently. Regular consumers of dry beans and high-fiber
diets, such as begetarians, may find that the body adapts to minimize the
problem of flatulence.
Both doctors agree that fiber should be added to the diet gradually, to
give the intestinal bacteria time to adapt to THEIR new diet. They also agree
that eliminating gas-producing foods completely from the diet is not
advisabel--not only because it is impractical, but it would mean missing out
on too many nutrients that are recognized as reducing the risk of heart disease
and cancer.
More than 99% of gas from below is made up of odorless vapors--carbon
dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, and methane. There are traces of such
horrid gases as hydrogen sulfide, however, that give odor and character to the
flatus. These gases are so pungent that people can detect them at levels of
one half part per billion parts of air.
Methane, hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide are flammable. Fraternity boys
have for years ignited their emissions, but it's more than a party trick. A
simple experimant, too obvious to describe, will show that when a lighted match
is placed in the vicinity of the eruption, one can see a flutter of activity
around the flame, and the odor disappears instantly.
MANNERLY QUESTIONS
------------------
Because flatulence is unpleasant, it may well be the last taboo to be
brought into the open. Judith Martin, who writes the syndicated column "MISS
MANNERS," doesn't make it any easier.
Pain and agony not withstanding, she says that passing gas--or even
worse, making a noise while doing so--is simply unacceptable. "There are
noises that are acknowledged by neither the noisemaker nor the noise recipient,
because socially they do not exist," she says.
"Many subjects are socially unacceptable, and most of them have to do
with the body," says Mark King, a psychologist at the University of Pittsburgh.
"Other cultures are freer about talking about bodily functions such as
gas. And in our society, men seem to deal with the problems bettrer than
women. Anyone who has attended a stag party or seen the movie "Blazing
Saddles" might agree. Women might as well lighten up and tolerate this
necessary function."
ANTI-GAS PRODUCTS
-----------------
But can anything be done to minimize gas??
Various over-the-counter products are available, but with varying
degrees of success. One type claims to break up bubbles in the stomach.
Another contains charcoal, which absorbs gas. A substance called simethicone
is the basis of many "anti-gas" products on the market, usually combined with
an antacid, but there is some disagreement about its effectiveness.
And now there is Beano, a new product that has become very popular
since its introduction two years ago. Its a natural source food enzyme that
works to prevent the production of gas from gassy foods. The enzyme acts
specifically on the complex sugars in foods, making them more digestible and
less likely to cause bloating and flatulence. The manufacturer says Beano will
not affect fiber or interfere with its benefits in any way.
Beano has a slight soy sauce flavor, and it's easy to use. You just
add 3 to 8 drops to the first spoonful of gassy food that's to be eaten.
There's a solution to your pet's gas problems, too: a product called
CurTail. The manufacturer claims that there are no side effects with either
product.
For a free sample of Beano, call 1-800-257-8650 during business hours
weekdays.
NATURAL SOLUTIONS
-----------------
Other cultures have dealt with the problem of gas in a variety of
natural ways.
An increase of yogurt and buttermilk in the diet increases friendly
bacteria in the colon and is said to "sweeten" the gas. Lemon juice and
vinegar aid in breaking down cellulose.
Herbs such as anise, fennel, caraway and peppermint, called
carminatives, stimulate digestion by increasing the secretion of gastric juices
while decreasing the action of digestive bacteria.
Many after-dinner cordials contain these herbs in alcoholic solutions.
Familiar ones are anisette and Creme De Menthe.
|
97.127 | Go ahead and say it: "FART" | SHALOT::MEDVID | Dancing in the deepest oceans | Fri Mar 20 1992 09:51 | 304 |
| This is one of my favorite articles of all time...
<<< VISA::USER:[NOTES$LIBRARY]JOYOFLEX.NOTE;1 >>>
-< The Joy of Lex >-
================================================================================
Note 124.0 On Farting 3 replies
BABEL::SAVAGE 291 lines 9-DEC-1985 15:53
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**************
The following article (slightly abridged by me) was written by
Michael Kimball an elementary school music teacher from Maine, and
first appeared in the summer of 1982, in a magazine called the "The
CoEvolution Quarterly." I know not of the exact whereabouts of the
author or the editor (having been simply handed a faded photocopy by
person unknown) so I haven't tried to get permission for this
distribution. The text is very long for this file, so you should
'extract' before reading:
**************
'...[the] piece you're reading is a strong candidate for the
definitive modern work on intestinal gas and its socio-scientific
place in the world.
'Fart, itself, is considered vulgar and unacceptable by our diction-
aries. Flatulence, an acceptable word, is defined: "The presence of
excessive gas in the digestive tract." But who cares about it,
really, when it's still in the body? The word flatulent is an
adjective describing the condition of having excessive gas in the
digestive tract. Flatus, gas generated in the stomach or intestine,
is another noun.
'...here's an excerpt from a letter defending the word fart, a
breath of fresh air as it were, written by a Dr. Robert J.L. Waugh
to the New England Journal of Medicine: "...such awkward phrases as
passed flatus or excreted gas are always used in instead of farted.
And a fart - as a noun - can be visualized on X-ray."
'...others in the medical profession, would-be etymologists...
weren't quite ready to accept the verb/noun fart. One suggestion
for a better verb was crepitate. Now, crepitate means literally,
"a creaking or rattling sound," and may be fitting, albeit conde-
scending, for older folks; but it's certainly not the universal verb
we need. How about exogust? Actually, that's not a bad noun, but
it makes a fairly awkward verb. Boomerate? A good British-type verb
for a certain genre of fart, but overstated in most cases.
A logical entry was flatulate; the only drawback is the pomposity of
its three syllables (or four, as in, "Who flatulated?"). Another
one was B.M. burp. I hate that one. It's lewd and it's tasteless.
Exmeteorate? Sounds like what Jor-El used to do before Krypton
exploded. Then there was gaseous intestinal discharges, and an
entry from Harvard Medical School for deflate as both "pleasing to
the ear and etymologically satisfying." Not bad, but we might stop
and consider the reputations of balloons and tires. And, finally,
someone humorously suggested the term flatus advance by rectal
transport, or its acronym, FART.
Fart, for me, says it all. It's derived from the Greek word perdix,
meaning partridge, a bird that makes a sharp, whirring sound when
flushed. The root, perd, easily changed to pherd, then to the more
staccato Germanic fertan, then to fartan in Old English, and finally
to its present refinement, fart.
Fart is unpretentious, simple, and above all, onomatopoetically
right on target - especially here in New England, where a dialec-
-tical pronunciation is closer to faaht, which is pretty darn close
to the real sound (a little off target west of the Mississippi;
though, not even native Californians roll the R when they farrt).
The dead bullseye, onomatopoetically speaking, of course, is the
children's word poop, from the noun poopyhorn. This is easily
demonstrated by tightly pursing the lips and expelling a short burst
of wind through them. Society, however, chooses to leave poop
behind in the nursery of baby words such as doo-doo, pee-pee,
bum-bum, nay-nay, and mousie-with-(or without)-the-hat.
Fart also tops all other countries in onomatopoetics. In Russia,
you don't fart, or even poop. You {word with eighteen Cyrillic
characters}, and if that's onomatopoetically satisfying, it must be
physically jarring. In Germany you furz... A fart in Italy is
flato... In Paris, they pet, a neat little verb, when you think
about it - pet - well fitted to the cosmopolitan Parisian and to the
villager alike.
It's no surprise, really, that France would be right up there
contending in fart linguistics. After all, she gave the world Le
Petomane, the greatest exponent of the "pet" that ever lived. Le
Petomane (his real name was Joseph Pujol) rose to fame and fortune
on the stage of the Moulin Rouge in late nineteenth century Paris,
where at the height of his unusual career he was earning more than
double the box office of his celebrated contemporary, Sarah
Bernhardt. Pujol's remarkable talent was his ability to inhale and
exhale fresh air through his anus, an odorless performance of music,
mimicry, and other dubious feats such as blowing out candles from
two feet away. (Naturally, if his gusts were gaseous, he would have
torched the people in the good seats.)
Decked out in a red coat, white bow tie, and gloves, and sporting
black satin breeches, Pujol's most popular routines were his amazing
imitations: "The one...a little girl...; this...the mother-in-law;
this...the bride on her wedding night; this...the dressmaker tearing
two yards of calico" (a ten second rip that was reportedly an
uncanny imitation). Other standards in his popular routine were, of
course the sounds of thunder and ("Gunners, stand by your guns!
Ready - fire!") canons.
Le Petomane not withstanding, humans have taken remarkably few
strides through the ages in understanding, let alone accepting,
the fart. Way back in 400 B.C. Hippocrates wrote in his Book of
Prognostics: "It is best when wind passes without noise, but is it
better that flatulence should pass even thus than it should be
retained; and when a man does pass thus, it indicates either that
the man is pain or delirium, unless he give vent to the wind spon-
taneously." Delirium? Perhaps that is why, even 2000 years later,
proper Victorian ladies would swoon dramatically if an audible fart
sneaked out past the rustling of their bustles.
Insanity and drunkenness have also been singled out. In Chaucer's
Canterbury Tales, the miller claims, "First, I want to declare that
I am drunk; I know it from the noise I'm making...." And in 1577
another Englishman, Hugh Rhode, wrote in his Booke of Nurture and
Schoole of Goode Manners: "Be not lowde where you be, not at the
table where you syt; Some men will deems thee dronken, mad, or else
to lack thy wit."
Inevitably, the lowly fart became the object of breezy underground
satire. In 1722, in the tenth edition of anonymous author's pamphlet,
The Benefit of Farting Explained, was printed, "Wrote in Spanish by
Don Fart in Hando, translated into English by Obadiah Fizle." And
Mark Twain, in 1890, wrote a privately printed parody which was
dubbed by fans "A Fart in Queen Elizabeth's Court."
The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, indeed, proved dark years
for the fart, knocking it down the social ladder to the bottom rungs
of acceptance. It had become the object of street slang and
derision. A parasite was now called a fart-sucker; one's footman
or valet, his fart-catcher. Trousers were your farting crackers.
In Ireland, your jaunting car was a farting-trap, probably a sly dig
to the horse that pulled it. And if the horse became restless and
began walking in circles, he was "like a fart in a colander" - that
is, until the later part of the nineteenth century; then he was
"like a fart in a bottle." If you "couldn't trust your arse with a
fart" you had diarrhea, same as if you "let a brewer's fart, grains
and all."
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
It wasn't until 1976 that serious attention was finally given to the
fart. In Minneapolis, a Dr. Michael D. Levitt, professor of
medicine at the University of Minnesota Hospital and Associate Chief
of Research of the Minneapolis Veterans Administration (and probably
the world's leading authority on the fart), was contacted by a
28-year old man who complained that his excessive gas was ruining
his sex and social lives. Dr. Levitt and his associates took the
man's case and in the process of treating him made several important
observations concerning the fart, which they detailed in a paper
entitled "Studies of a Flatulent Patient" (New England Journal of
Medicine, July 29, 1976).
In the article, the doctors pointed out that the fart is composed of
five gases: hydrogen, carbon dioxide, methane (methane is inexplic-
ably produced by only a third of the population, and it is this lucky
group that has floating feces), and smaller amounts of oxygen and
nitrogen. The oxygen and nitrogen accumulate in the intestines when
air is swallowed, while hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and methane are
produced in the large intestine as the body's last resort in its
digestive process....
Undigested foods...are [mostly] complicated sugars that cannot be
absorbed by the small intestine, such ... sugars [are] found in
cabbage, radishes, and apples; it is the bacteriological breakdown
of these sugars in the large intestine which produces gas, giving us
the fart, with all its thrust and characteristic odor.
The doctors found further that the average 28-year old man farts 14
(plus or minus 5.6) times a day, quite a bit less that the unfortu-
nate man who originally contacted Dr. Levitt. By his own flatograph-
ic estimates, he had been averaging 35 farts daily for two years.
Dr. Levitt performed a flatoanalysis of the man's gas and found it
was 70 percent hydrogen, indicating intraluminal production (that is,
produced by the lower intestine). Sugar was the suspect, specifically
the lactose found in milk. So to test that suspicion, the patient
was ordered to drink nothing but milk for two days. Sure enough, on
the second day he nearly exploded, farting an incredible 141 times,
including a four-hour roll of 70 blasts, a probable world record!
Bizarre as it may seem, surgical patients with gas actually run the
risk of exploding. Anyone who has ever struck a match to a fart can
testify to its flammable properties, but when the gas is hydrogen,
trapped in an intestine, look out. Dr. Levitt tells of a surgeon
who was cauterizing a rectal polyp on a patient when a spark touched
off the patient's intestinal gas. The explosion blew the doctor
backward into the wall, jammed the patient's head into the table,
and ripped open six inches of his colon. Fortunately, the doctor
recovered and patient survived.
You may ask why do I fart more than my neighbor? Certainly the food
you eat and the way you eat it are the two major contributors to
farting. If you are an air swallower - if you gulp your food and
drink, or take a breath before each swallow, or if you drink from a
bottle - you will fart more. Carbonation and chewing gum will also
put more air into the fart, hence, more fart into the air.
The lactose in milk can cause lots of gas in people without enough
of the enzyme lactase to break it down. Other foods which are known
gas producers are bran, onions, cucumbers, raisins, cauliflower,
lettuce, coffee, and dark beer. And, of course, the infamous baked
bean, which contains the indigestible sugars called trisaccharides.
Look, if you really want a fartless bean, all you have to do is
remove the trisaccharides. Simply soak the beans for at least three
hours and drain off the water before cooking. That'll do it, mostly,
but for extra fart-free beans, keep changing the water the beans are
boiling in. The only problem with this method is that along with
removing the gas, you will be removing some nutrients....
But why do all that to the baked beans in the first place?
Everybody farts, right? ...why the secrecy? Why the taboo? Why
does society officially not believe in farts? Why, for heaven's
sake, in Emily Post's Etiquette, is there never a mention of passing
gas?
It would have been an easy task for her to offer some rules for
flatulence; simply by taking a cue from Steve ("Mind if I smoke?
No, mind if I fart?") Martin, and substituting fart for smoke (or
cigarette) in Chapter 64 of Etiquette, "For Those Who Smoke" becomes
a workable code of gastric behavior. For Example:
FOR THOSE WHO FART
o One may not fart in a church or during any religious service or
ceremonial proceedings.
o One may not fart in a sickroom unless the patient himself is
farting or unless he specifically says his visitor is welcome to
fart.
o Good taste still forbids farting by a woman on a city street. It
should be unnecessary to say that no one should think of farting
or lighting a fart when dancing.
o Farting is still forbidden on local buses and on some coaches on
the railroad. These cars are clearly marked "No Farting."
o Farting is permitted in the mezzanine or loge seats in some movie
houses, but never in the main orchestra.
o Farting is forbidden in most museums, although some have
designated areas where it is allowed.
o Legitimate theaters do not allow farting in the theater proper.
It is usually allowed in the outer lobby, and those who wish to
fart during the intermission go there to do so. It is perfectly
correct for a man who wishes to fart to leave a lady who doesn't,
but he should hurry back, and not leave her too frequently.
o In private situations when there might be some objection, before
lighting your fart, always ask, "Do you mind if if I fart?" If
there is any in the reply, do your best to refrain from farting
until you leave.
o A man should light a woman's fart if he is close to her, but not
if he is on the other side of the table or if it would be awkward
in any way.
Not bad. Aside from the obvious gender double-standard, pretty
sensible advice, wouldn't you say? Too bad she missed the boat.
Well, I didn't. We're in the eighties now, a time of radical
conformity, and it's high time people had a little farting etiquette,
so here it is. Cut this section out and tape it to your refrigera-
tor, 'cause it's official - and it's modern!
A WHOLISTIC APPROACH TO ANAL-GASTRO-SOCIAL SYSTEMS
1 Fart is an acceptable verb and noun.
2 It is generally appropriate to fart in the presence of one's
friends and/or immediate family, so long as the area is
ventilated.
3 When in the company of those other than close friends or family,
simply move to an open ventilated part of the room, fart and say,
"Excuse me" or if you prefer, "Canadian geese."
Never fan the fart back at the others unless specifically asked to
do so.
4 It is often unnecessary to comment on the volume, timbre, pitch,
and or olfactory strength of your fart unless someone else
comments.
5 There is little to be said for the rascal who farts in close
proximity to an infant emerging from the womb or a person on his
deathbed.
6 It is seldom necessary to fart into the telephone.
|
97.128 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Fri Mar 20 1992 10:04 | 12 |
| You guys are heading for ph.d's in proctology. Youns Pittsburghese
must be anal-retentive.
And if youns need new career, with your knowldege of anti-flatulence,
sell Beano. What a theme song
"Beano, Beano, makes old rectums new.
"You'll sell a million bottles,Woo,Woo,Woo,Woo,Woo".
You'll also be ready for stage.
HTH
|
97.129 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Mar 20 1992 12:33 | 4 |
| Ha ha ha, Dan'l I got tears in my eyes. Nope, not from a fart, but
from your replies. Man, they are great. Gotta copy them for the wife.
lEe
|
97.130 | | CAMONE::WAY | Happy 307th Birthday, JSB | Fri Mar 20 1992 12:41 | 33 |
| YOu know what has always fascinated me is why some words in a language
are considered off-color, and others are not.
[please note any words in this reply are here for evidenciary purposes only
and not to cause offense to anyone. this is a lexical discourse]
For example, the word feces is a commonly accepted word, and is on you
could use in a meeting. Suppose that on the way into the building you
inadvertantly positioned your wing-tips into a pile of dog doo.
Upon entering the meeting you could say "Darn it, I appear to have some
dog feces on my shoe".
But the word "shit" is not accepted. If you walked in there, and
said "Darn it, but I appear to have stepped in dog shit", everyone would
be offended, and they'd start saying things like "Gee, this guy is just
like that Chainsaw fellow".
The word "fart" seems to be unacceptable, yet you can say, with a grin,
"I just pooped", "I just tooted", "I just passed gas" or "I just broke
wind".
Included are words describing genitalia. I won't print them here,
but some words, especially the anatomical ones, are okay, yet the
slang ones are not....
Does anyone know why this is?
'Saw
|
97.131 | Don King said "tes-ti-kals" on tv! | SASE::SZABO | A black Sportie and a cold beer... | Fri Mar 20 1992 12:44 | 1 |
|
|
97.132 | Try saying that in a meeting.. | SALES::THILL | | Fri Mar 20 1992 13:49 | 9 |
| re -2
I dunno, but the TV and Radio media in Holland and N. Belgium had a real hard
time during the Gulf War. Seems the pronounciation of the word "SCUD" (sounds
a little more like "Scoot") is a rather vulgar slang expression for the female
genitalia. They ended up spelling it out saying "Ess-Say-Ooh-Day" since it
really is an acronym, than risk saying a naughty word on TV/Radio.
Tom
|
97.133 | | CAMONE::WAY | Happy 307th Birthday, JSB | Fri Mar 20 1992 13:56 | 11 |
| Well, it's kind of like someone down under talking about a fanny pack.
Up here it's a harmless little piece of equipment great for carrying your
lunch while hiking.
Down under, fanny is a naughty word for female genitalia....
Whew!
'Saw
|
97.134 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | It ain't the thing, it's the fling | Fri Mar 20 1992 14:51 | 15 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 97.130 Miscellaneous Information 130 of 133
CAMONE::WAY "Happy 307th Birthday, JSB" 33 lines 20-MAR-1992 12:41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>For example, the word feces is a commonly accepted word, and is on you...
^^^^^^^^^
Interesting typo there, 'saw. No feces on you.
Speaking about breaking wind, I taught my two year old daughter, Alex,
to say "Mommy's toot toot" every time I break wind.
Bruce
|
97.135 | | CAMONE::WAY | Happy 307th Birthday, JSB | Fri Mar 20 1992 14:56 | 9 |
| >Interesting typo there, 'saw. No feces on you.
>
> Speaking about breaking wind, I taught my two year old daughter, Alex,
> to say "Mommy's toot toot" every time I break wind.
You could call it a Freudian Shat I suppose...8^)
'SAw
|
97.136 | Air Apparent | CELTIK::JACOB | Have you 'given' your quart today?? | Fri Mar 20 1992 17:36 | 15 |
|
I guess this Le Petomane guy was the French Male equivalent of
Honeysuckle Divine then, No??
>> o A man should light a woman's fart if he is close to her, but not
>> if he is on the other side of the table or if it would be awkward
>> in any way.
Thanks for clearing this up for me, I always wondered what the proper
etiquette was in this situation.
JaKe
|
97.137 | buttocks | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Wed Mar 25 1992 10:47 | 34 |
| reprinted without permission:
Bottom line on buttocks
by Steve Marshall
USA TODAY
Webster's defines buttocks simply as "the rump".
But lawmakers in St. John's County, on Florida's northeast
coast, needed 136 words and female mannequins to flesh out a law
regulating display of the buttocks.
An anti-nudity ordinance debated Wednesday night defined the
buttocks as:
"The area at the rear of the human body which lies between
two imaginary lines running parallel to the ground, when a
person is standing. The first or top of such line drawn at
the top of the cleavage of the nates (i.e., the prominence
formed by the muscles running from the back of the hip to the
back of the leg) and the second or bottom line drawn at the
lowest visible point of this cleavage or the lowest point of
curvature of the fleshy protuberance, whichever is lower. And
between two imaginary lines on each side of the body, which
lines are perpendicular to the ground and to the horizontal
lines described above, and which perpendicular lines are
drawn through the point at which each nate meets the outer
side of each leg."
The proposed law would be the county's answer to skimpy bikinis,
lingerie fashion shows and waitresses' attire at the Cafe Erotica.
TTom
|
97.138 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | | Thu Mar 26 1992 09:39 | 13 |
|
"Hey, Joe, check out the fleshy protrubences on that one."
"Yowsa, Mike, the horizontal area in relation to the linear dimensions
of the perpendicular sector which runs from the ground through the
point at which each nate meets the outer side of the leg is most
bodacious."
"Duh... what are youze guys talkin about..... Hey! Yo, sweet mama!
Nice ass!"
Dickstah
|
97.139 | Reading Phillies 1992 schedule | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Tue Mar 31 1992 12:43 | 5 |
| If anyone would like a photocopy of the Reading Phillies (Phillies'
double-A farm team) 1992 schedule, send me mail.
py
|
97.140 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Tue Mar 31 1992 13:09 | 3 |
| PY, I thought that Philles were smoked, not read?
lEe
|
97.141 | Break Inquirer | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:50 | 15 |
| A local "atlernative" rag has come out with its April Fool's Day edition.
On the cover:
Jesse's Visage Appears on Wingate Bovine
Jesse Helm's that is; Wingate, SC, that is; The cow's name is Besse.
The owner, Roscoe P. Mapplethorpe claims: "When she twitches her butt,
Jesse kind of looks like he's talkin', don't he?".
Another banner story is about a charlotte woman who claims that Elvis
isn't dead. "He's living in my cleavage".
TTom
|
97.142 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Barkley for Foreign Ambassador | Wed Aug 05 1992 14:49 | 9 |
|
The ball that Bill Buckner let dribble through his wickets in that
(in)famous World Series game in 1986 sold at auction yesterday for
$93,000. It was only expected to fetch $8 - 10 thousand.
Charlie Sheen bought it. He outbid me, he did.
Dickstah
|
97.143 | 8K with Buckner, 93K without? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Head down Frogman | Wed Aug 05 1992 15:12 | 4 |
| At that price, I guess you didn't have to take Buckner with the ball,
huh?
TTom
|
97.144 | | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Wed Aug 05 1992 15:14 | 4 |
| Ty Cobb's uniform went for over $100K!
'Saw
|
97.145 | last time I rooted for them bums | FRETZ::HEISER | Nephilim hunter | Wed Aug 05 1992 15:23 | 1 |
| Maybe it included Bill's glove. He certainly didn't need it.
|
97.146 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 05 1992 15:42 | 9 |
| These auctions just illustrate how absolutely stupid this memorabilia crap
has gotten.
Someone actually paid for a toothpick Tom Seaver used! Something like $400.00
Next thing ya know they'll be auctioning off George Brett's old PreperationH
tubes.
JD
|
97.147 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Aug 05 1992 15:53 | 3 |
| I want to know how much dat WP/passed ball by Stanley/MPH went for.
That was jest as bad.
|
97.148 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Mount Rialto Radio | Wed Aug 05 1992 16:00 | 4 |
| Before youse guys go ballistic, be aware that a percentage of the
proceeds of this auction went to charity.
Mark.
|
97.149 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Barkley for Foreign Ambassador | Wed Aug 05 1992 16:55 | 5 |
|
> proceeds of this auction went to charity.
The Bill Buckner Center for Hand-eye Coordination Disorders?
|
97.150 | wonder what he paid $93K for | JUPITR::MIOLA | Phantom | Thu Aug 06 1992 06:16 | 5 |
|
The kicker is, Buckner claims HE HAS THE BALL......
Lou
|
97.151 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Aug 06 1992 08:39 | 3 |
| The 93K ball has Mookie Wilson's signature on it. And he also wrote
something like "The ball that won it for us, 10/xx/86" on the ball.
Denny
|
97.152 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Barkley for Foreign Ambassador | Thu Aug 06 1992 09:53 | 8 |
|
I wonder how many of those balls Mookie made up?
I hear Jim Garrison is working with Oliver Stone to bring to film the
"Second Ball Theory."
Dickstah
|
97.153 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Thing of beauty and a boy forever | Fri Nov 06 1992 10:20 | 9 |
|
In the For-What-It's-Worth Ho-Hum Department, somewhere near the bottom
of page 9 in section C of the noozepapah, it is mentioned that Bobby
Fisher beat Boris Spasky in the 30th game to take their latest
head-to-head contest. Compare this to the front-page, top of the 11:00
news hype and coverage of their first meeting a few years back.
Dickstah
|
97.154 | FWIW= a cool $ 5 mill! Whar's my rook? | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Fri Nov 06 1992 10:35 | 1 |
|
|
97.155 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Nov 06 1992 10:39 | 4 |
| � -< FWIW= a cool $ 5 mill! Whar's my rook? >-
I heard that $5 mil was the total purse. Fischer received something
like $3.2 mil for winning and Spasky received the balance.
|
97.156 | Has Beens | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Hail to Bill Long and TcM | Fri Nov 06 1992 10:39 | 1 |
|
|
97.157 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Jan 07 1993 11:17 | 21 |
|
Didn't know where to put this, so I guess this is as good a place
as any.
Nice piece in USA TODAY on another of my "lookers" from High School
that I talked about some 4 years ago.
Seems Cary Kolat, the wrestling phenom from SW Pa. has started his
college career (Penn St.) with a bang. In his first college match,
seems he pinned a kid from Iowa (ranked No. 1) who Dan Gable thought
was a good wrestler. Kolat is rated 3rd best in the nation at his
weight (134), and folks are starting to murmur about the possibility
of 4 NCAA titles. If you remember, Kolat was only the 9th wrestler
in Pennsylvania wrestling history to win 4 state titles. He also set
a state record for consective wins at 137-0.
BTW, Penn St. is wrestling in the Big Ten and is currently No. 2
in the nation and 3-0-1 in the Big Ten.
bill..g.
|