[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference csc32::consolemanager

Title:POLYCENTER Console Manager
Notice:Kits, Scans, Docs on CSC32:: as PCM$KITS:,PCM$DOCS:, PCM$SCANS:
Moderator:CSC32::BUTTERWORTH
Created:Thu Aug 06 1992
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1541
Total number of notes:6564

1323.0. "Problem with read-only C3 and Security" by PHXSS1::ADKINS () Mon Jun 17 1996 11:43

    I'm attempting to set up PCM to have a batch job start when the system
    boots for a read-only monitor. I set up an account and gave it access
    to half the systems. I then logged into that account and edited C3 to
    what I wanted. I logged out to my account and did a console edit to
    remove all the systems from the user. I also took off edit c3 from
    their profile. Then I did a Console reconfig.
    
    I then logged back into their account. I could not edit my C3 layout,
    but I could Console Connect to any of the previously entered systems.
    It looks like PCM is looking at my CONSOLE$C3.DAT file and not the
    system security file. Since that's a text file, it would be fairly easy
    to edit it to add a system in.
    
    So, I guess my questions are two,
    
    1) Is this execpected behavior, and if so , isn't this a security
    problem?
    
    2) How can I configure a use to see the icons in a group, but not be
    able to connect to them?
    
    Jim Adkins
    
                            
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1323.1CSC32::BUTTERWORTHGun Control is a steady hand.Mon Jun 17 1996 12:5030
>    I'm attempting to set up PCM to have a batch job start when the system
>    boots for a read-only monitor. I set up an account and gave it access
>    to half the systems. I then logged into that account and edited C3 to
>    what I wanted. I logged out to my account and did a console edit to
>    remove all the systems from the user. I also took off edit c3 from
>    their profile. Then I did a Console reconfig.
>    
>    I then logged back into their account. I could not edit my C3 layout,
>    but I could Console Connect to any of the previously entered systems.
>    It looks like PCM is looking at my CONSOLE$C3.DAT file and not the
>    system security file. Since that's a text file, it would be fairly easy
>    to edit it to add a system in.
    
>    So, I guess my questions are two,
    
>    1) Is this execpected behavior, and if so , isn't this a security
>    problem?
    
    You mentioned you are using groups. If you remove accss to a particular
    system, but that system is part of a group a user has access to then
    they get access to the system.
    
>    2) How can I configure a use to see the icons in a group, but not be
>    able to connect to them?
    
    You must use CONSOLE C3/READ_ONLY
    
Regards,
       Dan    
                            
1323.2Way too many options for me ;-)PHXSS1::ADKINSMon Jun 17 1996 13:2321
>>    2) How can I configure a use to see the icons in a group, but not be
>>    able to connect to them?
    
>    You must use CONSOLE C3/READ_ONLY
    
    OK. It looks better. First time I tried, I could still connect the
    console, but after a reconfig, it seems to work as specified. 
    
    But the user can still go into Options-General and change to connect on
    double-click. When you double-click, nothing happens. No message or
    anything.
    
    I thought I remembered a user who I set up to acces a group, but not a
    system in the group. When he would double-click on a system he didn't 
    have access to, he'd get a console window, it would say you don' have
    access to this system and exit. I'll double-check on that.
    
    Thanks
    
    Jim
    
1323.3CSC32::BUTTERWORTHGun Control is a steady hand.Mon Jun 17 1996 14:1819
>    But the user can still go into Options-General and change to connect on
>    double-click. When you double-click, nothing happens. No message or
>    anything.
    
    Hmmmm.... I would consider this a very minor bug as it should at least
    output a message box saying you can't connect to the system. There's no 
    security hole at least as your user can't connect to the system.
    
>    I thought I remembered a user who I set up to acces a group, but not a
>    system in the group. When he would double-click on a system he didn't 
>    have access to, he'd get a console window, it would say you don' have
>    access to this system and exit. I'll double-check on that.
    
    
      It should allow him access to the system via the group specification.
    
    
    Regs,
      Dan