Title: | POLYCENTER Console Manager |
Notice: | Kits, Scans, Docs on CSC32:: as PCM$KITS:,PCM$DOCS:, PCM$SCANS: |
Moderator: | CSC32::BUTTERWORTH |
Created: | Thu Aug 06 1992 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1541 |
Total number of notes: | 6564 |
Folks VMS 6.1 PCM 1.5-006 A couple of problems... Firstly, a situation where an archive was stopped which left PCM aware that a particular managed system was being archived. Reconfiguring, stopping and restarting, deleting the system, restarting and readding the system using another name (S35A instead of S35) have all failed to get this system out from under the archive in progress flag. How do we? aside (I had thought that the configuration file must be ISAM and determined to try to solve this myself by seeing whether the archive information was held in this file. anal/rms revealed my naivity... this is a Unix hangover - a sequential stream file. Are we ever to be rid of this steam computing? Was it 25 years ago that IBM invented ISAM? My own bookshelves only revealed a tome � 1981 that suggested that IBM was dumping ISAM in favour of VSAM. We know the usefullness of ISAM in the VMS environment. Why a sequential stream file? Perhaps it has something to do with some early papers I read on Unix (which made up the Ultrix docset) which showed that the writers of Unix (2 man years, 10000 lines of code) reckoned that a locking mechanism was unnecessary as the operating system would, in the main, be used for editing documents etc. Here we are editing files and the problems caused by not being able to lock at the record level... soln in 1.6? lock at the file level. NT has better locking than VMS, but perhaps we shouldn't mention the war) aside over Secondly, we are experiencing a situation where PCM appears to be funtioning correctly except that no monitor, nor connect can be made. Every other aspect seems to work - showing events is up-to-date. But connect and monitor clear the screen and hang. Even the lock icon is not placed on the connected to system... I fear a resource limit, a reboot will fix (can only schedule one in 24 hours) is there a way to see which resources could be depleted? CONSOLE$TMP made available to the lads by mail. Tony Sherrard
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
848.1 | Please upgrade to V1.6-100 | OPG::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Mon Jul 03 1995 19:01 | 23 |
Tony, We fixed a problem today where the archive flags in shared memory were not being cleared down correctly, this could be the problem (I'm almost certain that it is) you are seeing. This fix will be in the first ECO for V1.6 (No, dont ask me when, it all depends on resources). The archive flag is held in a shared memory section, dont whatever you do go playing with it, you can upset a whole bunch of other stuff if you do!!! The file is the format it is (stream) because we are a multi-platform product, we (Digital) dont offer a no cost ISAM files on Digital UNIX, so to make support easy we use the lowest common denominator. The same goes for the log files. Finally, upgrade to V1.6, it will fix a lot of your problems I believe the problem you have with the connect sessions hanging is fixed in 1.6. Cheers, Phil | |||||
848.2 | Why I'm not Upgrading | OPCO::TSG_TAS | Mr Mass | Tue Jul 04 1995 15:39 | 16 |
Folks A reboot has cleared both problems We are an FM or OMS or whatever it is now site, so have to be real careful about new versions of software. This is the first time we have seen either of these problems in well over six months. We are a site that has had bad experiences with the RWMBX problem, though this has been less of a problem recently. I have been holding off upgrading because of the processes going into LEF after an archive problem. If we have to restart PCM each archive it's pointless upgrading. How ubiquitous is this problem? In what sort of sites does it occur? Tony Sherrard | |||||
848.3 | OPG::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Wed Jul 05 1995 14:57 | 8 | |
Tony, We believe we have just found the cause of the LEF after archive problem, after testing thoroughly over the next day or so, we will be releasing a IFT of the first ECO kit for V1.6. Cheers, Phil |