| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 725.1 | | YOSSAM::SIMON | Simon Jackson @reo 830 X3879 | Thu May 11 1995 11:35 | 7 |
| Marielle
we are currently field testing the V1.6 release of PCM. A lot of work
has been done to fix problems in the process communication code in this version.
Please Pull the FT kit (location in note 2.LAST in this conference asnd tell us
if this fixes your problem.
Cheers sImon...
|
| 725.2 | FT Version | SWTHOM::DEGAGE | | Fri May 12 1995 09:37 | 7 |
| Thanks a lot for your reply.
So it seems to be a problem within the product and not within the customer
configuration.
May I give the FT 1.6 to the customer ??
Marielle
|
| 725.3 | | PBUNIX::pgb | And through the square window... | Fri May 12 1995 10:57 | 9 |
| Marielle,
By all means, give T1.6 to your customer, but please explain to
them that this is FT software and we are continually fixing bugs
as they are reported.
Cheers,
Phil
|
| 725.4 | wait for a next FT-kit | HLSM04::GERRIT | Gerrit Woertman, UTO, 838-2535 | Fri May 12 1995 14:02 | 10 |
| Hi,
I also had this problem in V1.5, upgraded to the current FT T1.6-kit,
and my LEF-situation got even worse, i.e. an unworkable situation,
where we reboot the station once an hour.
regards,
Gerrit
|
| 725.5 | | YOSSAM::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Sat May 13 1995 19:16 | 10 |
| All,
When this LEF situation occurs, does the controller it happens to have
PSEUDO terminal devices assigned to it?
The reason I ask is that we have experienced this problem ourselves over
the last couple of days when we have been using Pseudo terminals.
Cheers,
Phil
|
| 725.6 | LEF not only on PSEUDO terminals | HLSM04::GERRIT | Gerrit Woertman, UTO, 838-2535 | Mon May 15 1995 22:49 | 36 |
| The LEF situation occurs on a controller with Pseudo terminal devices,
even when this is only doing very little, like:
$ set noon
$ wait 00:00:10
$ i = f$trnlnm("SYS$INPUT")
$ c = f$trnlnm("SYS$COMMAND")
$ o = f$trnlnm("SYS$OUTPUT")
$ set term 'o'/broad
$ write sys$output "SYS$INPUT =''i' SYS$COMMAND = ''c' SYS$OUTPUT = ''o'"
$ write sys$output "Issuing $ REPLY/ENA"
$ reply/ena
$ write sys$output "Issuing $ REPLY/STAT"
$ reply/stat
$ wait 00:01:00
$ loop:
$ write sys$output "This is reply only terminal"
$ wait 01:00:00
$ goto loop
and on this station there are almost none OPCOM-messages.
When this system happens, according to the alphabet, to be the first
system for a controller, then it is a pity for the other 15 systems.
But besides the pseudoterminals, the LEF situation happens also
on a controller that gets quite a lot of console-output.
In our UTO-situation this already happened in V1.5, but things are
worse in the current FT-version.
In fact, last Friday I have downgraded to V1.5 to get a more stable
situation, after 5 unworkable days, and quite a lot of criticism!
On my failover-station I still have got the FT-version, and in the
quiet hours, I maybe can test new FT-kits.
Gerrit
|
| 725.7 | | PBUNIX::pgb | And through the square window... | Tue May 16 1995 11:26 | 10 |
| Gerrit,
This is a problem we found on Friday and fixed Monday which is why
we didnt release a new kit as planned on Friday!
Anyway, thanks for the confirmation that it is the same problem we
found, look for updated kits when we announce them later today.
Cheers,
Phil
|