| Connie,
Good point,
Logging of data will occur normally, its just that duplicate
entries will be in the times files, this is legal and expected.
Now, what is this going to affect?
I dont beleive any of the interfaces really care about the
timestamps in the log and archive files unless you need to
specifically go for a time, such as "FIND TIME" within the
Monitor interface. In this case you will be able to find
the same time twice unless you are going for an absolute
time, in which case I am not sure which one of the duplicates
you will get!
What are your customers specific concerns?
Cheers,
Phil
|
| Phil -
Customer concerns are varied depending on their environment, however
former VCS customers were advised via Release Notes as to the steps to
avoid VCS rolling over when it encountered duplicate keys based on
timestamps.
EXTRACT FROM DOCUMENT: "VAXcluster Console System 1.4 Release Notes"
"VCS uses the VMS system time (in the system time 64-bit format) for time
stamping the received console data. That time stamp is also used as the
index key in the VCS RMS console and event log files. When a time change
occurs on the VCS host system (especially when Daylight Savings Time is set
in the Fall), the risk of duplicated keys exists during the overlapping
time period. This problem is inherent to the way VMS maintains the clock
time." [The workaround follows this text.]
Another concern for customers will be customized ENS actions that are
dependent on EXTRACT data with checks against timestamps. I personally
know of number of customers doing some fancy checks. Do you think an
ARCHIVE or some other strategy might be used to avoid problems? Could
you do some testing so that we can say ...Engineering recommends blah?
Thanks again,
Connie
|
| Connie,
The VCS statement is irrelevent for PCM as we dont use indexed
files (or at least not RMS indexed ones!). All our files point
to offsets within each other, we only use the time file to get
the actual time of the line of log data. Events have their own
timestamp within the event file.
Extract will find the FIRST occurence of a particular time and
work forwards from their, so if the ask for 00:15 onwards, they
will possibly get an extract containing two 00:15 timestamps.
I dont beleive archiving will help in the current version of the
product as all that happens in a review is that several archive
files are "appended" the resulting data is then what is reported
against.
Cheers,
Phil
|